White Privilege | Ashkenazi Jews | Jews
Está en la página 1de 267

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and


White Privilege, Black

Lives Matter, Equality,
Global Warming, and
(You are all being played!)

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and


"The world is governed by very different personages from what is imagined by those who
are not behind the scenes." - Benjamin Disraeli
White privilege, its not about White privilege or White people per se. That is the very first thing
you have to understand in order to grasp what is really going on.
This is mostly about the ultra-rich people, the Power Elite (PE) who are Kings, Queens, Dukes,
Princes, and special bloodlines. They all rule their countries, and there are dozens upon dozens of
these figures in Europe, from a throne. Just like they did 1,000 years ago! And everyone but the
King, Queen, Duke, Prince, and family members were known as peasants. Guess what we are
going back to? A Feudal System, where a Global Monarchy will rule the world and all but a few
thousand people will be peasants.
There is a system in place now that has been in the making for centuries. This system has slowly
been grabbing control of the worlds wealth and thus control of the worlds governments but today
its becoming very visible. It should be clear to the average person that there is something unusual
going on.
They own the banks, corporations, Media, Hollywood, reality TV, professional sports, gossip
laden newspapers and websites that allow them to focus your reality on what they want you to
focus on. In short, they are keeping most people distracted from what is really going on. These are
all part of MKUltra which is a mind control experiment. Mind control as in constantly showing
you the same thing over and over where it conditions people to think in a certain way. To slowly
get people to think in a certain way. It is operant conditioning at is finest!
Then you have the Bilderberg Group and Trilateral Commission who control the Council on
Foreign Relations who control the Media. If you think Obama or Bush are making the decisions
you are not in the game!
Is there White privilege and an attack on Black males by White law enforcement? Instead of
arguing, how about we use facts, stats, and objectivity to come to a conclusion. This way you can
see what is really going on.
And one thing I want you to keep in mind is this. Who owns the Media? Who owns most of the
corporations and run most of the banks? Who are the Oligarchy, the ultra-rich people? Mostly
White people, for the most part anyway!
Exactly how much are the worlds billionaires worth? $7.05 trillion, according to
FORBES latest ranking besting last years record-breaking $6.4 trillion sum by a
hefty $650 billion. The jump is driven in part by 290 newcomers, our biggest freshman
class, which helps push the total number of billionaires in the world to 1,826, the highest
number weve ever recorded.
While anyone with enough loot to make our count is well within the top 1% worldwide,
income inequality is present even among this group: the richest 500 individuals
collectively hold $4.7 trillion of that $7.05 trillion total.

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

Here is your list of the wealthiest people according to Forbes Magazine in 2015.
1. Bill Gates
Net Worth: $79.2 B
2. Carlos Slim Helu & family
Net Worth: $77.1 B
3. Warren Buffett
Net Worth: $72.7 B
4. Amancio Ortega
Net Worth: $64.5 B
5. Larry Ellison
Net Worth: $54.3 B
6. Charles Koch
Net Worth: $42.9 B
6. David Koch
Net Worth: $42.9 B
8. Christy Walton & family
Net Worth: $41.7 B
9. Jim Walton
Net Worth: $40.6 B
10. Liliane Bettencourt & family
Net Worth: $40.1 B
11. Alice Walton
Net Worth: $39.4 B
12. S. Robson Walton
Net Worth: $39.1 B
13. Bernard Arnault & family
Net Worth: $37.2 B
14. Michael Bloomberg
Net Worth: $35.5 B
15. Jeff Bezos
Net Worth: $34.8 B
16. Mark Zuckerberg
Net Worth: $33.4 B
17. Li Ka-shing
Net Worth: $33.3 B
18. Sheldon Adelson
Net Worth: $31.4 B
19. Larry Page
Net Worth: $29.7 B
20. Sergey Brin
Net Worth: $29.2 B
21. Georg Schaeffler
Net Worth: $26.9 B
22. Forrest Mars Jr

Asian/Hong Kong

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

Net Worth: $26.6 B
22. Jacqueline Mars
Net Worth: $26.6 B
22. John Mars
Net Worth: $26.6 B
25. David Thomson & family
Net Worth: $25.5 B
26. Jorge Paulo Lemann
Net Worth: $25 B
27. Lee Shau Kee
Net Worth: $24.8 B
28. Stefan Persson
Net Worth: $24.5 B
29. George Soros
Net Worth: $24.2 B
29. Wang Jianlin
Net Worth: $24.2 B
31. Carl Icahn
Net Worth: $23.5 B
32. Maria Franca Fissolo & family
Net Worth: $23.4 B
33. Jack Ma
Net Worth: $22.7 B
34. Prince Alwaleed Bin Talal Alsaud
Net Worth: $22.6 B
35. Steve Ballmer
Net Worth: $21.5 B
35. Phil Knight
Net Worth: $21.5 B
37. Beate Heister & Karl Albrecht Jr.
Net Worth: $21.3 B
38. Li Hejun
Net Worth: $21.1 B
39. Mukesh Ambani
Net Worth: $21 B
40. Leonardo Del Vecchio
Net Worth: $20.4 B
41. Len Blavatnik
Net Worth: $20.2 B
41. Tadashi Yanai & family
Net Worth: $20.2 B
43. Charles Ergen
Net Worth: $20.1 B
44. Dilip Shanghvi
Net Worth: $20 B
45. Laurene Powell Jobs & family

White/American (Hungarian Jewish)
Arab/Saudi Arabian
White/Ukraine/American/British (Jewish)

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

Net Worth: $19.5 B
46. Dieter Schwarz
Net Worth: $19.4 B
47. Michael Dell
Net Worth: $19.2 B
48. Azim Premji
Net Worth: $19.1 B
49. Theo Albrecht Jr & family
Net Worth: $19 B
50. Michael Otto & family
Net Worth: $18.1 B
51. Paul Allen
Net Worth: $17.5 B


You get the picture right, mostly White. Here is the comprehensive list:
Richest 80 people in the world revealed... and 35 of them are American citizens
The combined wealth of the 80 richest billionaires is the same amount as that of the
bottom 50% of the Earth's population, Oxfam said in a new report
Eight of the top ten wealthiest billionaires are American
Oxfam found a steep drop and that 388 billionaires had the same amount of money as
the bottom 50% of the Earth's population in 2010
The charity's report also said that the richest 1 percent of the population will own more
than half the world's wealth by 2016
So who controls corporate hiring practices, the education system, and the economy in general?
Who controls the tax structure and legislation? Mostly Whites right?
Of course there is the Jewish conspiracy which I dont buy. I happen to subscribe to the idea that
whomever is running this dislikes Jews and are setting Jews up for the fall. But I could be wrong
as anyone else. Every expert has it figured it. Its the Jews, its the Nazis, and its the
Communists. And of course its White people, and its aliens. Someone is right, or maybe they all
are! Then there is the Ashkenazi and Khazarian theory. Whatever and whomever group is sitting
behind the certain, plenty are in plain sight so lets start with them.

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

How about we look at the Board of Directors for the Media starting with MSNBC?
Phil Griffin
Val Nicholas
Michael Rubin
Lauren Skowronski
Bill Wolff


Time Warner
Jeff Bewkes
James L. Barksdale
William P. Barr
Stephen F. Bollenbach
Robert C. Clark
Mathias Dpfner
Jessica P. Einhorn
Carlos M. Gutierrez
Fred Hassan
Kenneth J. Novack
Paul D. Wachter
Deborah C. Wright


Andrew Morse
Meredith Artley
Alex Wellen
Chris Berend
Dewey Reid
Kristi Halford


Fox News (News Corp.)

K. Rupert Murdoch
Joel I. Klein
Peter L. Barnes
James R. Murdoch
Jos Mara Aznar
Lachlan K. Murdoch
Natalie Bancroft
Ana Paula Pessoa
Elaine L. Chao
Masroor Siddiqui
John Elkann
Robert J. Thomson

White (Former PM of Spain)
Indian or Pakistani?

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and


Thirty of the 35 Mainstream Media Executives are White. Some Jews but White none the less.
So far weve determined that most of the Billionaires and Millionaires and high level Executives
in the Media are all White.
Lets throw a Bonus in. Huffington Posts Small Business Executives.
Rod Kurtz
Sir Richard Branson
Bob Parsons
Rob Dyrdek
Lexy Funk
Eric Ryan
Dylan Lauren
Clint Greenleaf
JJ Ramberg
Ken Yancey
Tom Szaky
Warren Brown
Jodie and Danielle Snyder
Rob Adams
Jennifer Hill
Lawrence Gelburd
Gary Whitehill
Phil Town
Rieva Lesonsky
Steve Strauss
Julie Jumonville
Tate Chalk
Elizabeth Busch
Anne Frey-Mott
Beckie Jankiewicz


What does this all tell us? So far, it tells us a couple things. One, money controls the Media
programs. And who controls the wealth and television programming? White people. But this
really doesnt explain the programming either way does it? Doesnt explain the race baiting and
actual lack of real news in the news does it?
News Corp., Wall Street Journal, Time Warner, Fortune, CNN, Bloomberg, MSNBC and
Thomson Reuters are corporate members of? Perhaps News Corp., Wall Street Journal, Time
Warner, Fortune, CNN, Bloomberg, MSNBC and Thomson Reuters receive their programming
from an external source?
This is where you need to not only have an open mind, but you need to let the evidence take
you where you need to go. If you are going to look at this with a closed mind then you will remain
ignorant. As I mentioned early, for centuries the Black Nobility, the European Monarchs have
been slowly gaining control of the worlds wealth and the governments.

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

Why do you think the United Nations (New York), International Monetary Fund (Washington
DC), World Bank (Washington DC), and International Bank of Settlements (Switzerland) and
Federal Reserve does? These are the heads of the Hydra, the Serpent!
All of the Media and most of the top multinational corporations and many members of the Media
as well as CEOs, VPs, Presidents etc. are members of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR).
Many people speculated throughout the years that there was a group controlling all the
programming. TV programming, Hollywood movie programming, music industry promotion, etc.
The CFR is that controller. The CFR and its members set the tone for what you see in the news,
the magazine ads, what you see day to day on the TV and in the movie theaters.
How about we explore the CFR for a moment. This is brief, you can go to their website and explore
all you want, I am not going to reinvent the wheel but I want to make a point as well.
Richard N. Haass (White)
President, Council on Foreign Relations
Expertise: U.S. foreign policy; international security; globalization; Asia; Middle

I am not listing them all, there is a lot of Staff members. But look at them. Almost all White.
Officers and Directors, Emeritus & Honorary
Madeleine K. Albright
Leslie H. Gelb
Maurice R. Greenberg
Peter G. Peterson
David Rockefeller
There is a nice little tidbit later on in regards to Madeleine K. Albright.
Peter Peterson succeeded David Rockefeller as Chairman of the CFR from 1985 until he retired in
2007. Maurice Greenberg is a former Chairman and was also a member of the Trilateral
And if you arent familiar with David Rockefeller you definitely arent in the game! In short, his
father was featured in The Men Who Built America.
Most of these people will their wealth to Foundations. They say charity but its a wealth transfer
which are NOT taxed. Most of the worlds Billionaires have pledged to give at least half their
wealth away. No, it isnt going to you or anyone else not in the elite. If these people wanted to be
generous and give to the poor, they would give it to the poor while they are still alive. This wealth
will stay untouched in a special bank far from the risk of being impacted from any kind of global
monetary meltdown. Some of the multimillionaires and billionaires who have pledged include

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

David Rockefeller, Warren Buffet, Red McComb, Paul Singer, Paul Allen, David Rubenstein,
Larry Ellison, Ted Turner, Ronald Perelman, Bill and Melinda Gates, Steve Case, Richard
Branson, Michael Bloomberg, Barron Hilton, Carl Icahn and many others. You can look at their
website to see the list. http://givingpledge.org/
These people cumulatively have trillions of dollars!
Officers and Directors
Board of Directors
Carla A. Hills (White)
Co-Chairman; Chairman and CEO, Hills & Company. Former Secretary for Housing and Urban
Development and former committee member on the Trilateral Commission.
In 2005, Hills participated in the Task Force on the Future of North America. The Task
Force produced a controversial report called Building a North American Community
sponsored by the Council on Foreign Relations. The reported advocated strengthening
trading relationships between the U.S., Canada and Mexico by making trade more
efficient, building infrastructure in North America, fast tracking borders and integrating
language. For example, it recommended assisting "elementary and secondary schools in
teaching about North America. Develop teacher exchange and training programs for
elementary and secondary school teachers. This would assist in removing language
barriers and give some students a greater sense of a North American identity. Greater
efforts should also be made to recruit Mexican language teachers to teach Spanish in the
United States and Canada.
So clearly not only does the CFR control the media, but it sets American policy. Or at least it
passes it on to the puppets running the government. This essentially says that our President all the
way through Congress answer to the CFR. One might ask, why dont you hire bi-lingual teachers
to teach English? If you read this report, it essentially says that the countries should enter one
Economic partnership.
They mention criminal activity, terrorists crossing the borders, and the only way to secure it is to
essentially have a joint military. So why are our borders open in 2015 if in 2005 they knew
terrorists and drug cartels were coming in through Mexico? Because we have a false flag on the
way people! An act that will allow all kinds of legislation to be suspended. They will likely blame
it on right wing terrorists or ISIS. If its right win extremists which is anyone who isnt for gay
rights, flooding the borders with 10s of millions of illegals, or actually feel the government should
follow the Constitution, they will go after guns.
This document is public for a reason. These people are not transparent in what they do. This
document is the unicorn version of what they are really up to.
Exclusive: High Level Source Confirms Secret US Nuclear Warhead Transfer
A high level source inside the military has now confirmed to us that Dyess Air Force base is
actively moving nuclear warheads to the East Coast of the United States in a secret transfer
that has no paper trail.

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

Top Nuke Commanders Fired Following Missing Nuclear Warheads Report
Two of the top nuclear commanders within the United States have now been suspended and
fired following the exclusive high level military leak report by Alex Jones and myself
regarding the secret and unsigned nuclear weapons transfer from Dyess Air Force base to
South Carolina. Disturbingly, the high level suspensions from top generals within the military
establishment are not the only red flags to follow the leaked report.
Even before it was announced that the second highest nuke commander in the United States
was suspended on the same day of the secret nuke transfer just weeks later, it was Senator
Lindsey Graham who went on record hours after our report in saying that a nuclear attack
could come to South Carolina in the event that we did not move militarily against Syria and
Iran pushing even harder to action against both Iran and Syria. This alone generated
hundreds of thousands to view our video reports and millions to examine our reports, which
had immediately gone from concerning high level military intelligence to an international
Rick Santorum questioned on Obama nuke transfer to South Carolina
Potential 2016 presidential candidate Rick Santorum was questioned on missing nuclear
warheads at a national security summit in South Carolina this week reports media outlet
According to the report, a woman in the crowd brought the issue up to Santorum in a fiery
rant against President Obama and his national security policy.
Obama tried to blow up a nuke in Charleston a few months ago, and the three admirals and
generals hes totally destroyed our military, hes fired all the generals and all the admirals
who said they wouldnt fire on the American people, the woman said.
Santorum pivoted quickly to instead comment on President Obamas executive amnesty.
Top officials deny viral nuke story
WASHINGTON Top military and congressional sources have denied reports that
unauthorized transfers of Americas nuclear weapons have occurred and that the suspension
of a Navy admiral and firing of a top Air Force general followed a fight inside government
ranks about the alleged situation.
Several publications have carried reports on the topic in recent days, including concerns
expressed by Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., over nuclear weapons in his state as well as the
removal of several military officers.
So this could be a false flag in the making or a litmus test for the government to see who would be
willing to go along with orders. This may have thwarted an attack but you can damn straight bet
if a nuclear bomb does go off, or a dirty bomb, members in the United States government and the
Obama Administration were involved.


White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

If youve read the books out there on the New World Order, everyone has it figured out. And
before I expand I want to be clear on the Jewish conspiracy and bring something up.
There is the Khazarian theory of Ashkenazi Jews in which some claim they are descendants of
Israel and others claim there is no DNA connection. No DNA evidence exists which identifies
Jew as a race. Most of the DNA is tied to Europeans who resided in Khazaria over 1,000 years
ago. It is said that these people converted overnight to Judaism by order of their king. There is said
to be markers that are unique and most of the evidence claims Ashkenazi is a mix of Arab and
European. Whatever the case may be, in terms of Jew, if you dont tell people the person is Jewish,
they would be identified as White. It is usually when you say that person is a Jew that some
people will mysteriously see facial figures that stereotypically identify them as Jew. I dont believe
it to be the case so I dont believe there is a Jewish conspiracy as in the race of Jews who are
pushing the world into world government. Others claim the Palestinians are more Semite than
are most of the Jews living in Israel today.
I would say most people forgot but most are clueless today so here is an update. Most of the
Jews were FORCED into Israel after World War II. The people running this show wanted to create
the state of Israel but no Jews wanted to pick up and leave what they had and move there. So
policies and pressure started forcing Jews into Israel. Today, Jews are being forced out of France
and the UK by the troves because of the importation of Muslims.
So the question I have for those that blame the Jews for todays sorrows. Why would you create
a Jewish State which is surrounded by so called anti-Semite Muslims? Why would you surround
yourself by people who want you dead? You probably wouldnt do that would you? And most
Jews living in Israel are fairly poor. If Jews were running the world then a Jewish State would
have been carved out of Russia, Hungary, Poland, or in a region not surrounded by Muslims.
So when I put White or White/Jewish, I am kind of making a point. Some identify themselves
as Jewish because that is an ethnic heritage thing. Mom was a Jew, I am a Jew. It is spiritual.
Anyone can be a Jew, Asians, Blacks, Hispanics, and Whites. But in the case of those identifying
themselves as Jewish, they all appear to be White. The Ashkenazi Jew debate is pretty much
done, its proven to be a European thing. Whether they trace back to the Levites or any of the other
tribes remains to be seen. Of course history has been controlled by the wealthy and elite so
whatever we think we know can obviously be questioned.
Surprise: Ashkenazi Jews Are Genetically European
The origin of the Ashkenazi Jews, who come most recently from Europe, has largely been
shrouded in mystery. But a new study suggests that at least their maternal lineage may
derive largely from Europe.
Though the finding may seem intuitive, it contradicts the notion that European Jews
mostly descend from people who left Israel and the Middle East around 2,000 years ago.
Instead, a substantial proportion of the population originates from local Europeans who
converted to Judaism, said study co-author Martin Richards, an archaeogeneticist at the
University of Huddersfield in England.
Ashkenazi Jews descend from 350 people, study finds
Bottleneck dates back 600 to 800 years, genome analysis shows; researcher says among
population everyone is a 30th cousin


White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

Researchers analyzed the genomes of 128 Ashkenazi Jews and compared them to those
of non-Jewish Europeans in order to determine which genetic markers are unique to
Ashkenazi Jews. They found that the Ashkenazi Jews genetic similarities were so acute
that one of the studys researchers, Columbia professor Itsik Peer, told the Live Science
website that among Ashkenazi Jews, everyone is a 30th cousin.
Can 23andMe identify Jewish ancestry?
There are no definitive ways to tell for certain if you have Jewish ancestry based on your
DNA. However there are a few ways you can determine whether the possibility exists.

For he is not a Jew, which is one outwardly; neither is that circumcision, which is
outward in the flesh: But he is a Jew, which is one inwardly; and circumcision is that of
the heart, in the spirit, and not in the letter; whose praise is not of men, but of God
Romans 2:28-29


White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

I know thy works, and tribulation, and poverty, (but thou art rich) and I know the
blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan
- Revelation 2:9
Behold, I will make them of the synagogue of Satan, which say they are Jews, and are
not, but do lie; behold, I will make them to come and worship before thy feet, and to know
that I have loved thee - Revelation 3:9
But I could be wrong about these people, maybe some mysterious test exists that only people at
the very top have access to and they are White in appearance but Jew. Maybe thats the plan, blame
White people when its Jews. Again, I dont think its Jews because Israel is Fd!
You can go do your own research and here are some articles but I am going to move on from here.
The rest of the CFR royalty.
Robert E. Rubin, David M. Rubenstein (White/Jewish)
Vice Chairman; Cofounder and Managing Director, The Carlyle Group
John P. Abizaid (White)
Senior Partner, JPA Partners LLC
Zo Baird (White)
President, The Markle Foundation
Alan S. Blinder (White/Jewish)
Gordon S. Rentschler Memorial Professor of Economics and Public Affairs, Princeton University
Mary Boies (White)
Counsel, Boies & McInnis LLP
David G. Bradley (White)
Chairman, Atlantic Media Company
R. Nicholas Burns (White)
Professor of the Practice of Diplomacy and International Politics, Harvard Kennedy School
Steven A. Denning (White)
Chairman, General Atlantic LLC
Blair Effron (White)
Partner, Centerview Partners, LLC
Laurence D. Fink (White/Jewish)
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, BlackRock


White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

Stephen Friedman (White)
Chairman, Stone Point Capital
Member of the Quill and Dagger society
Ann M. Fudge (White)
Vice Chairman and Senior Independent Director, Unilever NV, PLC
Timothy F. Geithner (White)
President, Warburg Pincus
Thomas H. Glocer (White)
Founder & Managing Partner, Angelic Ventures, LP
Stephen J. Hadley (White)
Principal, RiceHadley Gates, LLC
Peter B. Henry (Black)
Dean, Stern School of Business
J. Tomilson Hill (White)
Vice Chairman, The Blackstone Group
Susan Hockfield (White)
President emerita, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Donna J. Hrinak (White)
President, Boeing Brazil, The Boeing Company
Shirley Ann Jackson (Black)
President, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
James Manyika (Black)
Director (Senior Partner), McKinsey & Company, Director, McKinsey Global Institute
Jami Miscik (White)
President and Vice Chairman, Kissinger Associates, Inc.
Eduardo J. Padrn (Equador)
President, Miami Dade College
John A. Paulson (White/Equador/Jewish)
President, Paulson & Co.
Richard L. Plepler (White)
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Home Box Office, Inc. and Cinemax


White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

Ruth Porat (White/Jewish)
Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President, Morgan Stanley
Colin L. Powell (Black/Mixed)
United States Army (Ret.)
Richard E. Salomon (White)
Managing Partner, East End Advisors, LLC
James G. Stavridis (White)
Dean, The Fletcher School
Margaret Warner (White)
Senior Correspondent, PBS NewsHour
Vin Weber (White)
Partner, Mercury.
Christine Todd Whitman (White)
President, The Whitman Strategy Group
Daniel H. Yergin (White)
Vice Chairman, IHS
Hillary Clinton who is a member of the CFR gave the following speech:
I have been often to, I guess, the mother ship in New York City, but its good to have
an outpost of the Council right here down the street from the State Department. We get a
lot of advice from the Council, so this will mean I wont have as far to go to be told what
we should be doing." https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ba9wxl1Dmas
Then there is the Trilateral Commission! Do they run the CFR?
Trilateral Commission was founded in 1973 by David Rockefeller and Zbigniew Brzezinski.
Here is there organizational chart.
Organization Chart: http://trilateral.org/download/file/EU_list_4-15(1).pdf
The North American Group of the Trilateral Commission includes a maximum of 97 U.S.
members, 24 Canadian members and, since 2000, 13 Mexican members.
David Rockefeller is a former chair member for the Trilateral Commission


White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

Board and Executive Members of the Trilateral Commission include:
Chairman: Joseph S. Nye, Jr. (White)
He is the co-founder, along with Robert Keohane, of the international relations theory
neoliberalism, developed in their 1977 book Power and Interdependence.
Neoliberalism refers to a school of thought which believes that states are, or at least should
be, concerned first and foremost with absolute gains rather than relative gains to other states.
A state is an organized political community living under a single system of government.
He was also on the Board of Directors of the Council on Foreign Relations.
Deputy Chairman: Jaime Serra (From Mexico)
Dr. Serra led the negotiation and implementation of the North American Free Trade Agreement
(NAFTA); promoted the conclusion of the Uruguay Round and the creation of the World Trade
Organization (WTO); headed the negotiations of free trade agreements with Chile, Colombia,
Venezuela, Bolivia and Costa Rica and promoted the creation of the Federal Competition
Deputy Chairman: John Manley (White)
Former Canadian Prime Minister
Director: Michael J. ONeil (White)
Former Chief of Staff, Central Intelligence Agency, member of multiple lobbyist groups
Trilateral European group
The 175-member ceiling for the European group is divided into national quotas. Germany has a
quota of 20; France, Italy, and the United Kingdom each have a quota of 18; and Spain has a quota
of 12. The remaining national quotas range from 6 to 1.
The European Group includes members from Austria, Belgium/Luxembourg, Bulgaria,
Croatia, Cyprus, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece,
Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain,
Sweden, the Netherlands, and the United Kingdom. It now has a ceiling of 170 members which is
divided into national quotas. Germany has a quota of 20; France, Italy, and the United Kingdom
each have a quota of 18; and Spain has a quota of 12. The remaining national quotas range from 6
to 1.
Chairman: Jean-Claude Trichet
Deputy Chairman: Vladimir Dlouhy
Deputy Chairman: Michael Fuchs
European Director: Paul Rvay
The Japanese Group of 85 members expanded in 2000 to become the Pacific Asian Group and
now includes over 100 members from Japan, Korea, Australia, New Zealand, the original five

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

ASEAN countries (Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore and Thailand), India, and the
People's Republic of China. Triennium Participants from Hong Kong and Taiwan have also
participated. This group changed its name to Asia Pacific Group in 2012.
Chairman: Yasuchika Hasegawa
Deputy Chairman: Hong SeokHyun
Deputy Chairman: Jusuf Wanandi
Acting Director: Hideko Katsumata
Japan, Europe, and the United States being the only industrial countries when the Trilateral
Commission was created!
Barack Obama appointed eleven members of the Trilateral Commission to top-level and
key positions in his administration within his first ten days in office. This represents a
very narrow source of international leadership inside the Obama administration, with a
core agenda that is not necessarily in support of working people in the United States.
Obama was groomed for the presidency by key members of the Trilateral Commission.
Most notably, Zbigniew Brzezinski, co-founder of the Trilateral Commission with David
Rockefeller in 1973, has been Obamas principal foreign policy advisor.
According to official Trilateral Commission membership lists, there are only eightyseven members from the United States (the other 337 members are from other countries).
Thus, within two weeks of his inauguration, Obamas appointments encompassed more
than 12 percent of Commissions entire US membership.
Trilateral appointees include:
* Secretary of Treasury, Tim Geithner
* Ambassador to the United Nations, Susan Rice
* National Security Advisor, Gen. James L. Jones
* Deputy National Security Advisor, Thomas Donilon
* Chairman, Economic Recovery Committee, Paul Volker
* Director of National Intelligence, Admiral Dennis C. Blair
* Assistant Secretary of State, Asia & Pacific, Kurt M. Campbell
* Deputy Secretary of State, James Steinberg
* State Department, Special Envoy, Richard Haass
* State Department, Special Envoy, Dennis Ross
* State Department, Special Envoy, Richard Holbrooke
There are many other links in the Obama administration to the Trilateral Commission.
For instance, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton is married to Commission member
William Jefferson Clinton.
Secretary of Treasury Tim Geithners informal group of advisors include E. Gerald
Corrigan, Paul Volker, Alan Greenspan, and Peter G. Peterson, all members. Geithners
first job after college was with Trilateralist Henry Kissinger at Kissinger Associates.


White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

Trilateralist Brent Scowcroft has been an unofficial advisor to Obama and was mentor to
Defense Secretary Robert Gates. And Robert Zoelick, current president of the World
Bank appointed during the G.W. Bush administration, is a member.
According to the Trilateral Commissions website, the Commission was formed in 1973
by private citizens of Japan, Europe (European Union countries), and North America
(United States and Canada) to foster closer cooperation among these core democratic
industrialized areas of the world with shared leadership responsibilities in the wider
international system. The website says, The membership of the Trilateral Commission
is composed of about 400 distinguished leaders in business, media, academia, public
service (excluding current national Cabinet Ministers), labor unions, and other nongovernmental organizations from the three regions. The regional chairmen, deputy
chairmen, and directors constitute the leadership of the Trilateral Commission, along with
an Executive Committee including about 40 other members.
Since 1973, the Trilateral Commission has met regularly in plenary sessions to discuss
policy position papers developed by its members. Policies are debated in order to achieve
consensuses. Respective members return to their own countries to implement policies
consistent with those consensuses. The original stated purpose of the Trilateral
Commission was to create a New International Economic Order. Its current statement
has morphed into fostering a closer cooperation among these core democratic
industrialized areas of the world with shared leadership responsibilities in the wider
international system.
Since the Carter administration, Trilateralists have held these very influential positions:
Six of the last eight World Bank Presidents; Presidents and Vice-Presidents of the United
States (except for Obama and Biden); over half of all US Secretaries of State; and three
quarters of the Secretaries of Defense.
Two strong convictions guide the Commissions agenda for the 2009-2012 triennium.
First, the Trilateral Commission is to remain as important as ever in maintaining wealthy
countries shared leadership in the wider international system. Second, the Commission
will widen its framework to reflect broader changes in the world. Thus, the Japan Group
has become a Pacific Asian Group, which includes Chinese and Indian members, and
Mexican members have been added to the North American Group. The European Group
continues to widen in line with the enlargement of the EU.
Update by Patrick Wood
The concept of undue influence comes to mind when considering the number of
Trilateral Commission members in the Obama administration. They control the areas of
our most urgent national needs: financial and economic crisis, national security, and
foreign policy.
The conflict of interest is glaring. With 75 percent of the Trilateral membership consisting
of non-US individuals, what influence does this super-majority have on the remaining 25
For example, when Chrysler entered bankruptcy under the oversight and control of the
Obama administration, it was quickly decided that the Italian carmaker Fiat would take
over Chrysler. The deals point man, Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, is a member
of the Trilateral Commission. Would you be surprised to know that the chairman of Fiat,
Luca di Montezemolo, is also a fellow member?

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

Congress should have halted this deal the moment it was suggested.
Many European members of the Trilateral Commission are also top leaders of the
European Union. What political and economic sway do they have through their American
If asked, the vast majority of Americans would say that Americas business is its own,
and should be closed to foreign meddlers with non-American agendas.
But, the vast majority of Americans have no idea who or what the Trilateral Commission
is, much less the power they have usurped since 1976, when Jimmy Carter became the
first Trilateral member to be elected president (Project Censored Story #1, 1976).
In light of todays unprecedented financial crisis, they would be abhorred if they actually
read Zbigniew Brzezinskis (co-founder of the Commission with David Rockefeller)
statement from his 1971 book, Between Two Ages: Americas Role in the Technetronic
Era, which states that, The nation-state as a fundamental unit of mans organized life has
ceased to be the principal creative force: International banks and multinational
corporations are acting and planning in terms that are far in advance of the political
concepts of the nation-state.
Yet, this is exactly what is happening. The global banks and corporations are running
circles around the nation state, including the United States. They have no regard for due
process, Congress, or the will of the people.
Why have the American people been kept in the dark about a subject so great that it shakes
our country to its very core?
The answer is simple: The top leadership of the media is also saturated with members of
the Trilateral Commission who are able to selectively suppress the stories that are
covered. They include:
David Bradley, Chairman, Atlantic Media Company
Karen Elliot House, former Senior Vice President, Dow Jones & Company, and
Publisher, the Wall Street Journal
Richard Plepler, Co-president, HBO
Charlie Rose, PBS
Fareed Zakaria, Editor, Newsweek
Mortimer Zuckerman, Chairman, US News & World Reports
There are many other top-level media connections due to corporate directorships and
stock ownership.
For more information, this writers original 1978 book, Trilaterals Over Washington, is
available in electronic form at no charge at http://www.AugustReview.com. This site also
has many papers analyzing various aspects of the Trilateral Commissions hegemony in
the United States and elsewhere, since its founding in 1973.
Every President since these groups were formed has had current or former members of the CFR
and Trilateral Commission in their cabinet.


White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

Then there is the Bilderberg Group. Be patient, you will not appreciate what is going on until
you understand the players and their motives.
Bilderberg Group
2015 members list
DEU Achleitner, Paul M.
Chairman of the Supervisory Board, Deutsche Bank AG
GBR Agius, Marcus
Non-Executive Chairman, PA Consulting Group
DNK Ahrenkiel, Thomas
Director, Danish Intelligence Service (DDIS)
USA Allen, John R.
Special Presidential Envoy for the Global Coalition to Counter ISIL, US Department of State
USA Altman, Roger C.
Executive Chairman, Evercore
USA Applebaum, Anne
Director of Transitions Forum, Legatum Institute
FIN Apunen, Matti
Director, Finnish Business and Policy Forum EVA
USA Baird, Zo
CEO and President, Markle Foundation
GBR Balls, Edward M.
Former Shadow Chancellor of the Exchequer
PRT Balsemo, Francisco Pinto
Chairman, Impresa SGPS
PRT Barroso, Jos M. Duro
Former President of the European Commission
FRA Baverez, Nicolas
Partner, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP
AUT Benko, Ren
Founder, SIGNA Holding GmbH
ITA Bernab, Franco
Chairman, FB Group SRL
NLD Beurden, Ben van
CEO, Royal Dutch Shell plc
FRA Bigorgne, Laurent
Director, Institut Montaigne
FRA Boone, Laurence
Special Adviser on Financial and Economic Affairs to the President
ESP Botn, Ana P.
Chairman, Banco Santander
NOR Brandtzg, Svein Richard
President and CEO, Norsk Hydro ASA
AUT Bronner, Oscar

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

Publisher, Standard Verlagsgesellschaft
USA Burns, William
President, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
FRA Calvar, Patrick
Director General, DGSI
FRA Castries, Henri de
Chairman and CEO, AXA Group
ESP Cebrin, Juan Luis
Executive Chairman, Grupo PRISA
CAN Clark, W. Edmund
Retired Executive, TD Bank Group
INT Coeur, Benot
Member of the Executive Board, European Central Bank
CAN Coyne, Andrew
Editor, Editorials and Comment, National Post
SWE Damberg, Mikael L.
Minister for Enterprise and Innovation
BEL De Gucht, Karel
Former EU Trade Commissioner, State Minister
USA Donilon, Thomas E.
Former U.S. National Security Advisor; Partner and Vice Chair, O'Melveny & Myers LLP
DEU Dpfner, Mathias
CEO, Axel Springer SE
GBR Dowling, Ann
President, Royal Academy of Engineering
USA Dugan, Regina
Vice President for Engineering, Advanced Technology and Projects, Google
NOR Eilertsen, Trine
Political Editor, Aftenposten
DNK Eldrup, Merete
CEO, TV 2 Danmark A/S
ITA Elkann, John
Chairman and CEO, EXOR; Chairman, Fiat Chrysler Automobiles
DEU Enders, Thomas
CEO, Airbus Group
USA Erdoes, Mary
CEO, JP Morgan Asset Management
GBR Fairhead, Rona
Chairman, BBC Trust
DNK Federspiel, Ulrik
Executive Vice President, Haldor Topse A/S
USA Feldstein, Martin S.
President Emeritus, NBER; Professor of Economics, Harvard University
AUT Fischer, Heinz
Federal President
GBR Flint, Douglas J.

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

Group Chairman, HSBC Holdings plc
CHE Franz, Christoph
Chairman of the Board, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd
NLD Fresco, Louise O.
President and Chairman Executive Board, Wageningen University and Research Centre
USA Griffin, Kenneth
Founder and CEO, Citadel Investment Group, LLC
ITA Gruber,
Lilli Executive Editor and Anchor Otto e mezzo, La7 TV
RUS Guriev, Sergei
Professor of Economics, Sciences Po
TUR Grkaynak, Gnen
Managing Partner, ELIG Law Firm
AUT Gusenbauer, Alfred
Former Chancellor of the Republic of Austria
NLD Halberstadt, Victor
Professor of Economics, Leiden University
AUT Hampel, Erich
Chairman, UniCredit Bank Austria AG
GBR Hassabis, Demis
Vice President of Engineering, Google DeepMind
AUT Hesoun, Wolfgang
CEO, Siemens Austria
CHE Hildebrand, Philipp
Vice Chairman, BlackRock Inc.
USA Hoffman, Reid
Co-Founder and Executive Chairman, LinkedIn
INT Ischinger, Wolfgang
Chairman, Munich Security Conference
USA Jacobs, Kenneth M.
Chairman and CEO, Lazard
DEU Jkel, Julia
CEO, Gruner + Jahr
USA Johnson, James A.
Chairman, Johnson Capital Partners
FRA Jupp, Alain
Mayor of Bordeaux, Former Prime Minister
DEU Kaeser, Joe President and CEO, Siemens AG
USA Karp, Alex
CEO, Palantir Technologies
FRA Kepel, Gilles
University Professor, Sciences Po
GBR Kerr, John
Deputy Chairman, Scottish Power
TUR Kesici, Ilhan
MP, Turkish Parliament
USA Kissinger, Henry A.

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

Chairman, Kissinger Associates, Inc.
USA Kleinfeld, Klaus
Chairman and CEO, Alcoa
NLD Knot, Klaas H.W.
President, De Nederlandsche Bank
TUR Ko, Mustafa V.
Chairman, Ko Holding A.S.
USA Kravis, Henry R.
Co-Chairman and Co-CEO, Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co.
USA Kravis, Marie-Jose
Senior Fellow and Vice Chair, Hudson Institute
CHE Kudelski, Andr
Chairman and CEO, Kudelski Group
DEU Lauk, Kurt
President, Globe Capital Partners
SWE Lemne, Carola
CEO, The Confederation of Swedish Enterprise
USA Levey, Stuart
Chief Legal Officer, HSBC Holdings plc
DEU Leyen, Ursula von der
Minister of Defence
BEL Leysen, Thomas
Chairman of the Board of Directors, KBC Group
GBR Maher, Shiraz
Senior Research Fellow, ICSR, King's College London
DNK Markus Lassen, Christina
Head of Department, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Security Policy and Stabilisation
USA Mathews, Jessica T.
Distinguished Fellow, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
USA Mattis, James
Distinguished Visiting Fellow, Hoover Institution, Stanford University
CHE Maudet, Pierre
Vice-President of the State Council, Department of Security, Police and the Economy of Geneva
CAN McKay, David I.
President and CEO, Royal Bank of Canada
TUR Mert, Nuray
Columnist, Professor of Political Science, Istanbul University
USA Messina, Jim CEO,
The Messina Group
BEL Michel, Charles
Prime Minister
USA Micklethwait, John
Editor-in-Chief, Bloomberg LP
GBR Minton Beddoes, Zanny
Editor-in-Chief, The Economist
ITA Monti, Mario

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

Senator-for-life; President, Bocconi University
FIN Mrttinen, Leena
Executive Director, The Finnish Family Firms Association
USA Mundie, Craig J.
Principal, Mundie & Associates
CAN Munroe-Blum, Heather
Chairperson, Canada Pension Plan Investment Board
NLD Netherlands, H.R.H. Princess Beatrix of the
IRL O'Leary, Michael
CEO, Ryanair Plc
GBR Osborne, George
First Secretary of State and Chancellor of the Exchequer
TUR zel, Soli
Columnist, Haberturk Newspaper; Senior Lecturer, Kadir Has University
GRC Papalexopoulos, Dimitri
Group CEO, Titan Cement Co.
FRA Pgard, Catherine
President, Public Establishment of the Palace, Museum and National Estate of Versailles
USA Perle, Richard N.
Resident Fellow, American Enterprise Institute
USA Petraeus, David H.
Chairman, KKR Global Institute
GRC Pikrammenos, Panagiotis
Honorary President of The Hellenic Council of State
CAN Reisman, Heather M.
Chair and CEO, Indigo Books & Music Inc.
ITA Rocca, Gianfelice
Chairman, Techint Group
AUT Roiss, GerhardCEO,
OMV Austria
USA Rubin, Robert E.
Co Chair, Council on Foreign Relations; Former Secretary of the Treasury
NLD Rutte, Mark
Prime Minister
USA Sadjadpour, Karim
Senior Associate, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
GBR Sawers, John
Chairman and Partner, Macro Advisory Partners
TUR Sayek Bke, Selin
Vice President, Republican Peoples Party
USA Schmidt, Eric E.
Executive Chairman, Google Inc.
AUT Scholten, Rudolf
CEO, Oesterreichische Kontrollbank AG
AUT Sevelda, Karl
CEO, Raiffeisen Bank International AG

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

INT Stoltenberg, Jens
Secretary General, NATO
FIN Stubb, Alexander
Minister of Finance
DEU Suder, Katrin
Deputy Minister of Defense
IRL Sutherland, Peter D.
UN Special Representative; Chairman, Goldman Sachs International
SWE Svanberg, Carl-Henric
Chairman, BP plc; Chairman, AB Volvo
NOR Svarva, Olaug CEO,
The Government Pension Fund Norway
USA Thiel, Peter A. President, Thiel Capital
GRC Tsoukalis, Loukas
President, Hellenic Foundation for European and Foreign Policy
INT zmc, Ahmet
Director-General, Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons
PRT Vitorino, Antnio M.
Partner, Cuetrecasas, Concalves Pereira, RL
SWE Wallenberg, Jacob
Chairman, Investor AB
USA Weber, Vin Partner, Mercury LLC
GBR Wolf, Martin H.
Chief Economics Commentator, The Financial Times
USA Wolfensohn, James D.
Chairman and CEO, Wolfensohn and Company
USA Zoellick, Robert B.
Chairman, Board of International Advisors, The Goldman Sachs Group
2014 Members List
FRA Castries, Henri de
Chairman and CEO, AXA Group
DEU Achleitner, Paul M.
Chairman of the Supervisory Board, Deutsche Bank AG
DEU Ackermann, Josef
Former CEO, Deutsche Bank AG
GBR Agius, Marcus Non-Executive Chairman,
PA Consulting Group
FIN Alahuhta, Matti
Member of the Board, KONE; Chairman, Aalto University Foundation
GBR Alexander, Helen
Chairman, UBM plc
USA Alexander, Keith B.
Former Commander, U.S. Cyber Command; Former Director, National Security Agency
USA Altman, Roger C.

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

Executive Chairman, Evercore
FIN Apunen, Matti Director,
Finnish Business and Policy Forum EVA
DEU Asmussen, Jrg
State Secretary of Labour and Social Affairs
HUN Bajnai, Gordon
Former Prime Minister; Party Leader, Together 2014
GBR Balls, Edward M.
Shadow Chancellor of the Exchequer
PRT Balsemo, Francisco Pinto
Chairman, Impresa SGPS
FRA Baroin, Franois
Member of Parliament (UMP); Mayor of Troyes
FRA Baverez, Nicolas
Partner, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP
USA Berggruen, Nicolas
Chairman, Berggruen Institute on Governance
ITA Bernab, Franco
Chairman, FB Group SRL
DNK Besenbacher, Flemming
Chairman, The Carlsberg Group
NLD Beurden, Ben van
CEO, Royal Dutch Shell plc
SWE Bildt, Carl
Minister for Foreign Affairs
NOR Brandtzg, Svein Richard
President and CEO, Norsk Hydro ASA
INT Breedlove, Philip M.
Supreme Allied Commander Europe
AUT Bronner, Oscar
Publisher, Der STANDARD Verlagsgesellschaft m.b.H.
SWE Buskhe, Hkan
President and CEO, Saab AB
TUR andar, Cengiz
Senior Columnist, Al Monitor and Radikal
ESP Cebrin, Juan Luis
Executive Chairman, Grupo PRISA
FRA Chalendar, Pierre-Andr de
Chairman and CEO, Saint-Gobain
CAN Clark, W. Edmund
Group President and CEO, TD Bank Group
INT Coeur, Benot
Member of the Executive Board, European Central Bank
IRL Coveney, Simon
Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine
GBR Cowper-Coles, Sherard

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

Senior Adviser to the Group Chairman and Group CEO, HSBC Holdings plc
BEL Davignon, Etienne
Minister of State
USA Donilon, Thomas E.
Senior Partner, OMelveny and Myers; Former U.S. National Security Advisor
DEU Dpfner, Mathias
CEO, Axel Springer SE
GBR Dudley, Robert
Group Chief Executive, BP plc
FIN Ehrnrooth, Henrik
Chairman, Caverion Corporation, Otava and Pyry PLC
ITA Elkann, John
Chairman, Fiat S.p.A.
DEU Enders, Thomas
CEO, Airbus Group
DNK Federspiel, Ulrik
Executive Vice President, Haldor Topse A/S
USA Feldstein, Martin S.
Professor of Economics, Harvard University; President Emeritus, NBER
CAN Ferguson, Brian
President and CEO, Cenovus Energy Inc.
GBR Flint, Douglas J.
Group Chairman, HSBC Holdings plc
ESP Garca-Margallo, Jos Manuel
Minister of Foreign Affairs and Cooperation
USA Gfoeller, Michael
Independent Consultant
TUR Gle, Nilfer
Professor of Sociology, cole des Hautes tudes en Sciences Sociales
USA Greenberg, Evan G.
Chairman and CEO, ACE Group
GBR Greening, Justine
Secretary of State for International Development
NLD Halberstadt, Victor
Professor of Economics, Leiden University
USA Hockfield, Susan
President Emerita, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
NOR Hegh, Leif O.
Chairman, Hegh Autoliners AS
NOR Hegh, Westye
Senior Advisor, Hegh Autoliners AS
USA Hoffman, Reid
Co-Founder and Executive Chairman, LinkedIn
CHN Huang, Yiping
Professor of Economics, National School of Development, Peking University
USA Jackson, Shirley Ann

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

President, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
USA Jacobs, Kenneth M.
Chairman and CEO, Lazard
USA Johnson, James A.
Chairman, Johnson Capital Partners
USA Karp, Alex
CEO, Palantir Technologies
USA Katz, Bruce J.
Vice President and Co-Director, Metropolitan Policy Program, The Brookings Institution
CAN Kenney, Jason T.
Minister of Employment and Social Development
GBR Kerr, John
Deputy Chairman, Scottish Power
USA Kissinger, Henry A.
Chairman, Kissinger Associates, Inc.
USA Kleinfeld, Klaus
Chairman and CEO, Alcoa
TUR Ko, Mustafa
Chairman, Ko Holding A.S.
DNK Kragh, Steffen President and CEO, Egmont
USA Kravis, Henry R.
Co-Chairman and Co-CEO, Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co.
USA Kravis, Marie-Jose
Senior Fellow and Vice Chair, Hudson Institute
CHE Kudelski, Andr
Chairman and CEO, Kudelski Group
INT Lagarde, Christine
Managing Director, International Monetary Fund
BEL Leysen, Thomas
Chairman of the Board of Directors, KBC Group
USA Li, Cheng
Director, John L.Thornton China Center, The Brookings Institution
SWE Lifvendahl, Tove
Political Editor in Chief, Svenska Dagbladet
CHN Liu, He
Minister, Office of the Central Leading Group on Financial and Economic Affairs
PRT Macedo, PauloMinister of Health
FRA Macron, Emmanuel
Deputy Secretary General of the Presidency
ITA Maggioni, Monica
Editor-in-Chief, Rainews24, RAI TV
GBR Mandelson, Peter
Chairman, Global Counsel LLP
USA McAfee, Andrew
Principal Research Scientist, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
PRT Medeiros, Ins de

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

Member of Parliament, Socialist Party
GBR Micklethwait, John
Editor-in-Chief, The Economist
GRC Mitsotaki, Alexandra
Chair, ActionAid Hellas
ITA Monti, Mario
Senator-for-life; President, Bocconi University
USA Mundie, Craig J.
Senior Advisor to the CEO, Microsoft Corporation
CAN Munroe-Blum, Heather
Professor of Medicine and Principal (President) Emerita, McGill University
USA Murray, Charles A.
W.H. Brady Scholar, American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research
NLD Netherlands, H.R.H. Princess Beatrix of the
ESP Nin Gnova, Juan Mara
Deputy Chairman and CEO, CaixaBank
FRA Nougayrde, Natalie
Director and Executive Editor, Le Monde
DNK Olesen, Sren-Peter
Professor; Member of the Board of Directors, The Carlsberg Foundation
FIN Ollila, Jorma
Chairman, Royal Dutch Shell, plc; Chairman, Outokumpu Plc
TUR Oran, Umut
Deputy Chairman, Republican Peoples Party (CHP)
GBR Osborne, George
Chancellor of the Exchequer
FRA Pellerin, Fleur State Secretary for Foreign Trade
USA Perle, Richard N.
Resident Fellow, American Enterprise Institute
USA Petraeus, David H.
Chairman, KKR Global Institute
CAN Poloz, Stephen S.
Governor, Bank of Canada
INT Rasmussen, Anders Fogh
Secretary General, NATO
DNK Rasmussen, Jrgen Huno
Chairman of the Board of Trustees, The Lundbeck Foundation
INT Reding, Viviane
Vice President and Commissioner for Justice, Fundamental Rights and Citizenship, European
USA Reed, Kasim
Mayor of Atlanta
CAN Reisman, Heather M.
Chair and CEO, Indigo Books & Music Inc.
NOR Reiten, Eivind Chairman, Klaveness Marine Holding AS
DEU Rttgen, Norbert

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

Chairman, Foreign Affairs Committee, German Bundestag
USA Rubin, Robert E.
Co-Chair, Council on Foreign Relations; Former Secretary of the Treasury
USA Rumer, Eugene
Senior Associate and Director, Russia and Eurasia Program, Carnegie Endowment for
International Peace
NOR Rynning-Tnnesen, Christian
President and CEO, Statkraft AS
NLD Samsom, Diederik M.
Parliamentary Leader PvdA (Labour Party)
GBR Sawers, John
Chief, Secret Intelligence Service
NLD Scheffer, Paul J.
Author; Professor of European Studies, Tilburg University
NLD Schippers, Edith
Minister of Health, Welfare and Sport
USA Schmidt, Eric E.
Executive Chairman, Google Inc.
AUT Scholten, Rudolf
CEO, Oesterreichische Kontrollbank AG
USA Shih, Clara
CEO and Founder, Hearsay Social
FIN Siilasmaa, Risto K.
Chairman of the Board of Directors and Interim CEO, Nokia Corporation
ESP Spain, H.M. the Queen of
USA Spence, A. Michael
Professor of Economics, New York University
FIN Stadigh, Kari
President and CEO, Sampo plc
USA Summers, Lawrence H.
Charles W. Eliot University Professor, Harvard University
IRL Sutherland, Peter D.
Chairman, Goldman Sachs International; UN Special Representative for Migration
SWE Svanberg, Carl-Henric
Chairman, Volvo AB and BP plc
TUR Taftali, A. mit
Member of the Board, Suna and Inan Kira Foundation
USA Thiel, Peter A. President,
Thiel Capital
DNK Topse, Henrik
Chairman, Haldor Topse A/S
GRC Tsoukalis, Loukas
President, Hellenic Foundation for European and Foreign Policy
NOR Ulltveit-Moe, Jens
Founder and CEO, Umoe AS
INT zmc, Ahmet

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

Director-General, Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons
CHE Vasella, Daniel L.
Honorary Chairman, Novartis International
FIN Wahlroos, Bjrn
Chairman, Sampo plc
SWE Wallenberg, Jacob
Chairman, Investor AB
SWE Wallenberg, Marcus
Chairman of the Board of Directors, Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken AB
USA Warsh, Kevin M.
Distinguished Visiting Fellow and Lecturer, Stanford University
GBR Wolf, Martin H.
Chief Economics Commentator, The Financial Times
USA Wolfensohn, James D.
Chairman and CEO, Wolfensohn and Company
NLD Zalm, Gerrit
Chairman of the Managing Board, ABN-AMRO Bank N.V.
GRC Zanias, George
Chairman of the Board, National Bank of Greece
USA Zoellick, Robert B.
Chairman, Board of International Advisors, The Goldman Sachs Group
Who is the Bilderberg Group?
They called themselves the Bilderberg Group with a membership representing a whos who of
world power elites, mostly from America, Canada, and Western Europe with familiar names like
David Rockefeller, Henry Kissinger, Bill Clinton, Gordon Brown, Angela Merkel, Alan
Greenspan, Ben Bernanke, Larry Summers, Tim Geithner, Lloyd Blankfein, George Soros, Donald
Rumsfeld, Rupert Murdoch, other heads of state, influential senators, congressmen and
parliamentarians, Pentagon and NATO brass, members of European royalty, selected media
figures, and invited others some quietly by some accounts like Barack Obama and many of his
top officials.
Always well represented are top figures from the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), IMF, World
Bank, Trilateral Commission, EU, and powerful central bankers from the Federal Reserve, the
ECBs Jean-Claude Trichet, and Bank of Englands Mervyn King.
For over half a century, no agenda or discussion topics became public nor is any press coverage
allowed. The few invited fourth estate attendees and their bosses are sworn to secrecy.
Nonetheless, Estulin undertook an investigative journey that became his lifes work. He states:
Slowly, one by one, I have penetrated the layers of secrecy surrounding the Bilderberg Group,
but I could not have done this without help of conscientious objectors from inside, as well as
outside, the Groups membership. As a result, he keeps their names confidential.
Whatever its early mission, the Group is now a shadow world government.threaten(ing) to take
away our right to direct our own destinies (by creating) a disturbing reality very much harming
the publics welfare. In short, Bilderbergers want to supplant individual nation-state sovereignty

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

with an all-powerful global government, corporate controlled, and check-mated by militarized
Imagine a private club where presidents, prime ministers, international bankers and generals rub
shoulders, where gracious royal chaperones ensure everyone gets along, and where the people
running the wars, markets, and Europe (and America) say what they never dare say in public.
Early in its history, Bilderbergers decided to create an Aristocracy of purpose between Europe
and the United States (to reach consensus to rule the world on matters of) policy, economics, and
(overall) strategy. NATO was essential for their plans to ensure perpetual war (and) nuclear
blackmail to be used as necessary. Then proceed to loot the planet, achieve fabulous wealth and
power, and crush all challengers to keep it.
Along with military dominance, controlling the worlds money is crucial for with it comes absolute
control as the powerful 19th century Rothschild family understood. As the patriarch Amschel
Rothschild once said: Give me control of a nations money and I care not who makes its laws.
Bilderbergers comprise the worlds most exclusive club. No one buys their way in. Only the
Groups Steering Committee decides whom to invite, and in all cases participants are adherents to
One World Order governance run by top power elites.
According to Steering Committee rules:
the invited guests must come alone; no wives, girlfriends, husbands or boyfriends. Personal
assistants (meaning security, bodyguards, CIA or other secret service protectors) cannot attend the
conference and must eat in a separate hall. (Also) The guests are explicitly forbidden from giving
interviews to journalists or divulge anything that goes on in meetings.
Host governments provide overall security to keep away outsiders. One-third of attendees are
political figures. The others are from industry, finance, academia, labor and communications.
Meeting procedure is by Chatham House Rules letting attendees freely express their views in a
relaxed atmosphere knowing nothing said will be quoted or revealed to the public. Meetings are
always frank, but do not always conclude with consensus.
Membership consists of annual attendees (around 80 of the worlds most powerful) and others
only invited occasionally because of their knowledge or involvement in relevant topics. Those
most valued are asked back, and some first-timers are chosen for their possible later usefulness.
Arkansas governor Bill Clinton, for example, who attended in 1991. There, David Rockefeller
told (him) why the North American Free Trade Agreement.was a Bilderberg priority and that
the group needed him to support it. The next year, Clinton was elected president, and on January
1, 1994 NAFTA took effect. Numerous other examples are similar, including who gets chosen for
powerful government, military and other key positions.
Bilderberg Objectives
The Groups grand design is for a One World Government (World Company) with a single, global
marketplace, policed by one world army, and financially regulated by one World (Central) Bank
using one global currency. Their wish list includes:
one international identify (observing) one set of universal values;

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

centralized control of world populations by mind control; in other words, controlling world
public opinion;
a New World Order with no middle class, only rulers and servants (serfs), and, of course, no
a zero-growth society without prosperity or progress, only greater wealth and power for the
manufactured crises and perpetual wars;
absolute control of education to program the public mind and train those chosen for various roles;
centralized control of all foreign and domestic policies; one size fits all globally;
using the UN as a de facto world government imposing a UN tax on world citizens;
expanding NAFTA and WTO globally;
making NATO a world military;
imposing a universal legal system; and
a global welfare state where obedient slaves will be rewarded and non-conformists targeted for
Secret Bilderberg Partners
In the US, the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) is dominant. One of its 1921 founders, Edward
Mandell House, was Woodrow Wilsons chief advisor and rumored at the time to be the nations
real power from 1913 1921. On his watch, the Federal Reserve Act passed in December 1913
giving money creation power to bankers, and the 16th Amendment was ratified in February
creating the federal income tax to provide a revenue stream to pay for government debt service.
From its beginnings, CFR was committed to a one-world government based on a centralized
global financing system. Today, CFR has thousands of influential members (including
important ones in the corporate media) but keeps a low public profile, especially regarding its real
Historian Arthur Schlesinger, Jr. called it a front organization (for) the heart of the American
Establishment. It meets privately and only publishes what it wishes the public to know. Its
members are only Americans.
The Trilateral Commission (discussed below) is a similar group that brings together global power
brokers. Founded by David Rockefeller, hes also a leading Bilderberger and CFR Chairman
Emeritus, organizations he continues to finance and support.
Their past and current members reflect their power:
nearly all presidential candidates of both parties;
leading senators and congressmen;
key members of the fourth estate and their bosses; and
top officials of the FBI, CIA, NSA, defense establishment, and other leading government
agencies, including state, commerce, the judiciary and treasury.
For its part, CFR has served as a virtual employment agency for the federal government under
both Democrats and Republicans. Whoever occupies the White House, CFRs power and
agenda have been unchanged since its 1921 founding.

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

It advocates a global superstate with America and other nations sacrificing their sovereignty to a
central power. CFR founder Paul Warburg was a member of Roosevelts brain trust. In 1950,
his son, James, told the Senate Foreign Relations Committee: We shall have world government
whether or not you like it by conquest or consent.
Later at the 1992 Bilderberg Group meeting, Henry Kissinger said:
Today, Americans would be outraged if UN troops entered Los Angeles to restore order;
tomorrow, they will be grateful. This is especially true if they were told there was an outside threat
from beyond, whether real or promulgated, that threatened our very existence. It is then that all
people of the world will plead with world leaders to deliver them from this evil.individual rights
will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well-being granted to them by their world
CFR planned a New World Order before 1942, and the UN began with a group of CFR members
called the Informal Agenda Group. They drafted the original UN proposal, presented it to
Franklin Roosevelt who announced it publicly the next day. At its 1945 founding, CFR members
comprised over 40 of the US delegates.
According to Professor G. William Domhoff, author of Who Rules America, the CFR operates in
small groups of about twenty-five, who bring together leaders from the six conspirator categories
(industrialists, financiers, ideologues, military, professional specialists lawyers, medical doctors,
etc. and organized labor) for detailed discussions of specific topics in the area of foreign affairs.
Domhoff added:
The Council on Foreign Relations, while not financed by government, works so closely with it
that it is difficult to distinguish Council action stimulated by government from autonomous
actions. (Its) most important sources of income are leading corporations and major foundations.
The Rockefeller, Carnegie, and Ford Foundations to name three, and theyre directed by key
corporate officials.
Dominant Media Partners
Former CBS News president Richard Salant (1961 64 and 1966 79) explained the major
medias role: Our job is to give people not what they want, but what we decide they ought to
CBS and other media giants control everything we see, hear and read through television, radio,
newspapers, magazines, books, films, and large portions of the Internet. Their top officials and
some journalists attend Bilderberg meetings on condition they report nothing.
The Rockefeller family wields enormous power, even though its reigning patriarch, David, will be
94 on June 12 and surely near the end of his dominance. However, for years the Rockefellers (led
by David) gained great influence over the media. (With it) the family gained sway over public
opinion. With the pulse of public opinion, they gained deep influence in politics. And with this
politics of subtle corruption, they are taking control of the nation and now aim for total world


White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

The Bilderberger-Rockefeller scheme is to make their views so appealing (by camouflaging
them) that they become public policy (and can) pressure world leaders into submitting to the needs
of the Masters of the Universe. The free world press is their instrument to disseminate
agreed-upon propaganda.
CFR Cabinet Control
The National Security Act of 1947 established the office of Secretary of Defense. Since then, 14
DOD secretaries have been CFR members.
Since 1940, every Secretary of State, except James Byrnes, has been a CFR member and/or
Trilateral Commission (TC) one.
For the past 80 years, Virtually every key US National Security and Foreign Policy Advisor has
been a CFR member.
Nearly all top generals and admirals have been CFR members.
Many presidential candidates were/are CFR members, including Herbert Hoover, Adlai
Stevenson, Dwight Eisenhower, John Kennedy, Richard Nixon, Gerald Ford, Jimmy Carter (also
a charter TC member), George HW Bush, Bill Clinton, John Kerry, and John McCain.
Numerous CIA directors were/are CFR members, including Richard Helmes, James Schlesinger,
William Casey, William Webster, Robert Gates, James Woolsey, John Deutsch, George Tenet,
Porter Goss, Michael Hayden, and Leon Panetta.
Many Treasury Secretaries were/are CFR members, including Douglas Dillon, George Schultz,
William Simon, James Baker, Nicholas Brady, Lloyd Bentsen, Robert Rubin, Henry Paulson, and
Tim Geithner.
When presidents nominate Supreme Court candidates, the CFRs Special Group, Secret Team
or advisors vet them for acceptability. Presidents, in fact, are told who to appoint, including
designees to the High Court and most lower ones.
Programming the Public Mind
According to sociologist Hadley Cantril in his 1967 book, The Human Dimension Experiences
in Policy Research:
Government Psycho-political operations are propaganda campaigns designed to create perpetual
tension and to manipulate different groups of people to accept the particular climate of opinion the
CFR seeks to achieve in the world.


White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

Canadian writer Ken Adachi (1929 1989) added:
What most Americans believe to be Public Opinion is in reality carefully crafted and scripted
propaganda designed to elicit a desired behavioral response from the public.
And noted Australian academic and activist Alex Carey (1922 1988) explained the three most
important 20th century developments The growth of democracy, the growth of corporate power,
and the growth of corporate propaganda as a means of protecting corporate power against
Web of Control
Numerous think tanks, foundations, the major media, and other key organizations are staffed with
CFR members. Most of its life-members also belong to the TC and Bilderberg Group, operate
secretly, and wield enormous power over US and world affairs.
The Rockefeller-Founded Trilateral Commission (TC)
On page 405 of his Memoirs, David Rockfeller wrote:
Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United
States characterizing my family and me as internationalists and conspiring with others around
the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure one world, if you
will. If thats the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.
In alliance with Bilderbergers, the TC also plays a vital role in the New World Orders scheme
to use wealth, concentrated in the hands of the few, to exert world control. TC members share
common views and all relate to total unchallengeable global dominance.
Founded in 1973 and headquartered in Washington, its powerful US, EU and East Asian members
seek its operative founding goal a New International Economic Order, now simply a New
World Order run by global elites from these three parts of the world with lesser members admitted
from other countries.
According to TCs web site, each regional group has a chairman and deputy chairman, who all
together constitute the leadership of the Committee. The Executive Committee draws together a
further 36 individuals from the wider membership, proportionately representing the US, EU, and
East Asia in its early years, now enlarged to be broadly global.
Committee members meet several times annually to discuss and coordinate their work. The
Executive Committee chooses members, and at any time around 350 belong for a three-year
renewable period. Everyone is a consummate insider with expertise in business, finance, politics,
the military, or the media, including past presidents, secretaries of state, international bankers,
think tank and foundation executives, university presidents and selected academics, and former
senators and congressmen, among others.
Although its annual reports are available for purchase, its inner workings, current goals, and
operations are secret with good reason. Its objectives harm the public so mustnt be revealed.
Trilaterals over Washington author Antony Sutton wrote:

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

this group of private citizens is precisely organized in a manner that ensures its collective views
have significant impact on public policy.
In her book, Trilateralism: The Trilateral Commission and Elite Planning for World Management,
Holly Sklar wrote:
Powerful figures in America, Europe, and East Asia let the rich.safeguard the interests of
Western capitalism in an explosive world probably by discouraging protectionism, nationalism,
or any response that would pit the elites of one against the elites of another, in their common
quest for global dominance.
Trilateralist Zbigniew Brzezinski (TCs co-founder) wrote in his Between Two Ages Americas
Role in the Technotronic Era:
people, governments and economies of all nations must serve the needs of multinational banks
and corporations. (The Constitution is) inadequate.the old framework of international politics,
with their sphere of influence.the fiction of sovereignty.is clearly no longer compatible with
TC today is now global with members from countries as diverse as Argentina, Ukraine, Israel,
Jordan, Brazil, Turkey, China and Russia. In his Trilaterals Over America, Antony Sutton believes
that TCs aim is to collaborate with Bilderbergers and CFR in establishing public policy
objectives to be implemented by governments worldwide. He added that Trilateralists have
rejected the US Constitution and the democratic political process. In fact, TC was established to
counter a crisis in democracy too much of it that had to be contained.
An official TC report was fearful about the increased popular participation in and control over
established social, political, and economic institutions and especially a reaction against the
concentration of power of Congress and of state and local government.
To address this, media control was essential to exert restraint on what newspapers may publish
(and TV and radio broadcast). Then according to Richard Gardner in the July 1974 issue of
Foreign Affairs (a CFR publication):
CFRs leadership must make an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece,
until the very notion disappears from public discourse.
Bilderberg/CFR/Trilateralist success depends on finding a way to get us to surrender our liberties
in the name of some common threat or crisis. The foundations, educational institutions, and
research think tanks supported by (these organizations) oblige by financing so-called studies
which are then used to justify their every excess. The excuses vary, but the target is always
individual liberty. Our liberty and much more.


White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

Bilderbergers, Trilateralists and CFR members want an all-encompassing monopoly over
government, money, industry, and property thats self-perpetuating and eternal. In Confessions
of a Monopolist (1906), Frederick C. Howe explained its workings in practice:
The rules of big business: Get a monopoly; let Society work for you. So long as we see all
international revolutionaries and all international capitalists as implacable enemies of one another,
then we miss a crucial point.a partnership between international monopoly capitalism and
international revolutionary socialism is for their mutual benefit.
In the Rockefeller File, Gary Allen wrote:
By the late nineteenth century, the inner sanctums of Wall Street understood that the most
efficient way to gain a monopoly was to say it was for the public good and public interest.
David Rockefeller learned the same thing from his father, John D., Jr. who learned it from his
father, John D. Sr. They hated competition and relentlessly strove to eliminate it for David on a
global scale through a New World Order.
In the 1970s and 1980s, Trilateralists and CFR members collaborated on the latters 1980
Project, the largest ever CFR initiative to steer world events toward a particular desirable future
outcome (involving) the utter disintegration of the economy. Why so is the question?
Because by the 1950s and 1960s, worldwide industrial growth meant more competition. It was
also a model to be followed, and had to be strangled in the cradle or at least greatly contained.
In America as well beginning in the 1980s. The result has been a transfer of wealth from the poor
to the rich, shrinkage of the middle class, and plan for its eventual demise.
The North American Union (NAU)
The idea emerged during the Reagan administration in the early 1980s. David Rockefeller, George
Schultz and Paul Volker told the president that Canada and America could be politically and
economically merged over the next 15 years except for one problem French-speaking Quebec.
Their solution elect a Bilderberg-friendly prime minister, separate Quebec from the other
provinces, then make Canada Americas 51st state. It almost worked, but not quite when a 1995
secession referendum was defeated 50.56% to 49.44%, but not the idea of merger.
At a March 23, 2005 Waco, Texas meeting, attended by George Bush, Mexicos Vincente Fox,
and Canadas Paul Martin, the Security and and Prosperity Partnership (SPP) was launched, also
known as the North American Union (NAU). It was a secretive Independent Task Force of North
America agreement a group organized by the Canadian Council of Chief Executives (CCCE),
the Mexican Council on Foreign Relations, and CFR with the following aims:
circumventing the legislatures of three countries and their constitutions;
suppressing public knowledge or consideration; and
proposing greater US, Canadian and Mexican economic, political, social, and security integration
with secretive working groups formed to devise non-debatable, not voted on agreements to be
binding and unchangeable.

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

In short a corporate coup dtat against the sovereignty of three nations enforced by hard line
militarization to suppress opposition.
If enacted, it will create a borderless North America, corporate controlled, without barriers to trade
or capital flows for business giants, mainly US ones and much more Americas access to vital
resources, especially oil and Canadas fresh water.
Secretly, over 300 SPP initiatives were crafted to harmonize the continents policies on energy,
food, drugs, security, immigration, manufacturing, the environment, and public health along with
militarizing three nations for enforcement.
SPP represents another step toward the Bilderberg/Trilateralist/CFR goal for World Government,
taking it one step at a time. A United Europe was another, the result of various treaties and
economic agreements:
the December 1951 six-nation European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC);
the March 1957 six-nation Treaty of Rome establishing the European Economic Community
(EEC); also the European Atomic Energy Commission (EAEC) by a second Treaty of Rome;
the October 1957 European Court of Justice to settle regional trade disputes;
the May 1960 seven-nation European Free Trade Association (EFTA);
the July 1967 European Economic Community (EEC) merging the ECSC, EAEC and EEC
together in one organization;
the 1968 European Customs Union to abolish duties and establish uniform imports taxing among
EEC nations;
the 1978 European Currency Unit (ECU);
the February 1986 Single European Act revision of the 1957 Treaty of Rome; it established the
objective of forming a Common Market by December 31, 1992;
the February 1992 Maastricht Treaty creating the EU on November 1, 1993; and
the name euro was adopted in December 1995; it was introduced in January 1999 replacing the
European Currency Unit (ECU); euros began circulating on January 2002; theyre now the official
currency of 16 of the 27 EU states.
Over half a century, the above steps cost EU members their sovereignty as some 70 to 80 per cent
of the laws passed in Europe involve just rubber stamping of regulations already written by
nameless bureaucrats in working groups in Brussels or Luxembourg.
The EU and NAU share common features:
advocacy from a influential spokesperson;
an economic and later political union;
hard line security, and for Europe, ending wars on the continent between EU member states;
establishment of a collective consciousness in place of nationalism;
the blurring of borders and creation of a supra-government, a superstate;
secretive arrangements to mask real objectives; and
the creation of a common currency and eventual global one.

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and


Steps Toward a North American Union

the October 4, 1988 Free Trade Agreement (FTA) between the US and Canada, finalized the
previous year;
at the 1991 Bilderberg meeting, David Rockefeller got governor Bill Clintons support for
NAFTA if he became president;
on January 1, 1994, with no debate under fast-track rules, Congress approved WTO legislation;
in December 1994 at the first Summit of the Americas, 34 Hemispheric leaders committed their
nations to a Free Trade of the Americas agreement (FTAA) by 2005 so far unachieved;
on July 4, 2000, Mexican president Vincente Fox called for a North American common market
in 20 years;
on February 2001, the White House published a joint statement from George Bush and Vincente
Fox called the Guanajuato Proposal; it was for a US-Canada-Mexico prosperity partnership (aka
North American Union);
in September 2001, Bush and Fox agreed to a Partnership for Prosperity Initiative;
the September 11, 2001 attack gave cover to including security as part of a future partnership;
on October 7, 2001, a CFA meeting highlighted The Future of North American Integration in
the Wake of Terrorist Attacks; for the first time, security became part of a future partnership
for prosperity; also, Canada was to be included in a North American agreement;
in 2002, the North American Forum on Integration (NAFI) was established in Montreal to
address the issues raised by North American integration as well as identify new ideas and strategies
to reinforce the North American region;
in January 2003, the Canadian Council of Chief Executives (CCCE composed of 150 top
CEOs) launched the North American Security and Prosperity Initiative calling for continental
in April 2004, Canadian prime minister Paul Martin announced the nations first ever national
security policy called Securing an Open Society;
on October 15, 2004, CFR established an Independent Task Force on the Future of North
America for a future continental union;
in March 2005, a CFR report titled Creating a North American Community called for continental
integration by 2010 to enhance, prosperity, and opportunity for all North Americans; and
on March 23, 2005 in Waco, Texas, America, Canada and Mexico leaders launched the Security
and Prosperity Partnership (SPP) aka North American Union (NAU).
Secretive negotiations continue. Legislative debate is excluded, and public inclusion and debate
are off the table. In May 2005, the CFR Independent Task Force on the Future of North America
published a follow-up report titled Building a North American Community proposing a
borderless three-nation union by 2010.
In June and July 2005, the Dominican Republic Central America Free Trade Agreement (DRCAFTA) passed the Senate and House establishing corporate-approved trade rules to further
impoverish the region and move a step closer to continental integration.


White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

In March 2006, the North American Competitiveness Council (NACC) was created at the second
SPP summit in Cancun, Mexico. Composed of 30 top North American CEOs, it serves as an
official trilateral SPP working group.
Secret business and government meetings continue so theres no way to confirm SPPs current
status or if Barack Obama is seamlessly continuing George Bushs agenda. In an earlier article,
this writer said:
SPP efforts paused during the Bush to Obama transition, but deep integration plans remain.
Canadas Fraser Institute proposed renaming the initiative the North American Standards and
Regulatory Area (NASRA) to disguise its real purpose. It said the SPP brand is tarnished so rebranding is essential to fool the public until its too late to matter.
Bilderbergers, Trilaterists, and CFR leaders back it as another step toward global integration and
wont stop until the entire world is unified under the auspices and the political umbrella of a One
World Company, a nightmarish borderless world run by the worlds most powerful clique
comprised of key elitist members of these dominant organizations.
In April 2007, the Transatlantic Economic Council was established between America and the EU
create an official international governmental body by executive fiat;
harmonize economic and regulatory objectives;
move toward a Transatlantic Common Market; and
a step closer to One World Government run by the worlds most powerful corporate interests.
Insights into the 2009 Bilderberg Group Meeting
From May 14 17, Bilderbergers held their annual meeting in Vouliagmeni, Greece, and according
to Daniel Estulin have dire plans for global economies.
According to his pre-meeting sources, theyre divided on two alternatives:
Either a prolonged, agonizing depression that dooms the world to decades of stagnation, decline
and poverty (or) an intense but shorter depression that paves the way for a new sustainable world
order, with less sovereignty but more efficiency.
Other agenda items included:
the future of the US dollar and US economy;
continued deception about green shoots signaling an end to recession and improving economy
later in the year;
suppressing the fact that bank stress tests were a sham and were designed for deception, not an
accurate assessment of major banks health;


White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

projecting headlined US unemployment to hit 14% by year end way above current forecasts
and meaning the true number will be double, at minimum, with all uncounted categories included;
a final push to get the Lisbon Treaty passed for pan-European (EU) adoption of neoliberal rules,
including greater privatizations, fewer worker rights and social benefits, open border trade
favoring developed over emerging states, and greater militarization to suppress civil liberties and
human rights.
After the meeting, Estulin got a 73-page report on what was discussed. He noted that One of
Bilderbergs primary concerns.is the danger that their zeal to reshape the world by engineering
chaos (toward) their long term agenda could cause the situation to spiral out of control and
eventually lead to a scenario where Bilderberg and the global elite in general are overwhelmed by
events and end up losing their control over the planet.
Estulin also noted some considerable disagreement between hardliners wanting a dramatic
decline and a severe, short-term depression (versus others) who think that things have gone too
far so that the fallout from the global economic cataclysm cant be known, may be greater than
anticipated, and may harm Bilderberger interests. Also, some European bankers (expressed great
alarm over their own fate and called the current) high wire act unsustainable.
There was a combination of agreement and fear that the situation remains dire and the worst of the
crisis lies ahead, mainly because of Americas extreme debt level that must be resolved to produce
a healthy, sustainable recovery.
Topics also included:
establishing a Global Treasury Department and Global Central Bank, possibly partnered with or
as part of the IMF;
a global currency;
destruction of the dollar through what longtime market analyst Bob Chapman calls a stealth
default on (US) debt by continuing to issue massive amounts of money and credit and in the
process devaluing the dollar, a process he calls fraud;
a global legal system;
exploiting the Swine Flu scare to create a WHO global department of health; and
the overall goal of a global government and the end of national sovereignty.
In the past, Estulins sources proved accurate. Earlier, he predicted the housing crash and 2007
2008 financial market decline, preceded by the kind of financial crisis triggered by the Lehman
Brothers collapse. Watch for further updates from him as new information leaks out on what the
worlds power elites have planned going forward.
Estulin will be the featured guest on The Global Research News Hour Tuesday, June 2. He can be
heard live or afterwards through the program archive.


White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

The Bilderberg Group met in June 2015. Within a short period you had two mass shootings, the
Confederate Flag frenzy, and gay marriage pass.
So Now You Know Who!
MOST of these people are White.
Members of the CFR, Trilateral Commission, and Bilderberg Group are laced with Corporate
CEOs, Executives, members of various governments, and Academia. These people are Professors,
scientists, and political figures and ultra-wealthy business owners. These people manage Hedge
Fund companies, run major investment firms like Blackrock, they are the CEOs and board
members of every major bank on Wall Street. They are Department of Defense, Admirals,
Generals, Joint Chiefs of Staff, Media Programming Executives, CEOs of Media companies,
Monarchy/Royalty and on and on it goes!
They are all tied from Eisenhower to Obama, Most of them were former CEOs, Board
Members, or affiliated with the major banks on Wall Street. Think they didnt tell Congress to bail
out the banks? And almost all of them are graduates of large schools like Princeton, Yale, Cornell,
MIT, Stanford, and Harvard. The vetting process!
Oh, and the Vatican is involved as well. Hence why the Pope has been pushing for the end of
Capitalism, atheists can go to heaven, homosexuals can go to Heaven. Hence why he has been
pushing the Global Warming agenda! And Global Warming is big in this agenda!
Who do you think controls Mossad, MI6, the CIA, FBI, and NSA? These groups do! And the
United Nations and NATO will feature heavily in our futures. The UN is where World Government
will be run out of!
This isn't a Conspiracy Theory. This is a GIANT CONSPIRACY that has been in the works for a
very long time. And this is the reason for White privilege and #blacklivesmatter.
But you think nothing is going on? That there is no global conspiracy. That the elite don't want to
rule over every government and all of the people and control everything? Like all of the worlds
natural resources? And who has access to them. That there isnt a group within a group, a collection
of psychopaths who want to CONTROL everything? Who arent greedy also?
White Privilege and #Blacklivesmatter starting to make more sense? How about the removal of
the Confederate Flag, Andrew Jackson, and the South? Next is the north. And then after that, the
American Flag in preparation for a North American Union.
It would be Racist against Canada and Mexico for the USA to have an American flag and a
Constitution. It would be racist to have one language wouldnt it? When we know language is the
number ONE barrier to progress.
Its why we have language, so we can communicate. But we should have 60 languages so no
one can communicate according to these people. Dont fall for the Race card BS.
So WHY is there White Privilege and Black Lives Matter?
It has to deal with the Global Warming and the Globalization Agenda!

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and


These elite are sacrificing all of the industrialized cultures in order to de-industrialize them. They
are doing this to remove wealth from 99.9% of the planets inhabitants so that they are easier to
control and so the carbon footprint is reduced in order to save the planet. Hence Global Warming.
If they control the water, food, oil and a global military, no one will be able to sustain on their
own without depending on the Feudal State and the Monarchy.
Slowly the picture starts to unravel! Sort of!
If you are someone who watches television or spends time on social media, or if you have a child
in college, I am sure you have come across the topic of White privilege at some point. You
certainly hear the term equality daily.
The question you might have is, what is White privilege? And that is a good question to ask
in this day and age of ignorant and uneducated people who have no idea what the meaning of many
terms are. The Media floods certain terms over and over and most people just repeat what they
hear. Take the word racist for example. It is featured on MSNBC, Mother Jones, Huffington
Post and CNN daily. But almost none of the topics of discussion are truly racial in nature.
The Media just makes them racial!
They may be sensitive but do to ignorance and political correctness almost every topic translates
into racism. And mainly because people have no idea what the term racist actually means. But
racism sells, and it divides.
A lot of people may find some of what they read offensive or racist because of the society
we live in. And guess what, I am not PC so I really dont care if you are offended or not. If truth
offends you, you need a good ass whipping! We live in a society where its okay to offend
whomever you want but when the people doing the offending are offended, the multitude of cards
come out. Race, sexist and homophobia card etc. but in reality are they really racist, sexist, or
homophobic? For the most part no, but again, we live in a pussified, uneducated, and weak society
where people want to ban the word fat but are ok with the White privilege movement and have
zero idea what half the terms thrown out on a daily basis even mean.
Political correctness is nothing but another program meant to restrict free speech, a tool for
control. Fat for example, the buzz word is full figured and curvy. Guess what full figured and
curvy mean? Fat! But people, rather than trying to lose weight can continue to slam double
whoppers with cheese down their throat and feel better about themselves if they are called curvy.
If you are offended by the term fat, lose some weight or deal with being fat. Curvy means you are
fat, but in a nice way. Political correctness has turned this nation into a bunch of pussies!
Has anyone ever stopped to think that if they remove freedom of speech for one group using
the Supreme Court, that nothing is stopping them from removing it for everyone? All these
movements arent about equality, they are about removing freedoms. And they are using gullible,
desperate, and stupid people to achieve this.
And let me just clear some things up. I despise both the Republican and Democrat parties and
everyone in them. They are all lying, corrupt, murdering, thieving scumbags. Owned by the
Oligarchy, all of them!
Freedom of Speech is a First Amendment right, protected by the United States Constitution and
by many state constitutions and state and federal laws. Right?

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and


Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the

free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of
the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of
But the corrupt Supreme Court is absolutely bought off and claims they can exclude certain speech
by categorizing it. In the case of categories, they try to restrict it citing hate speech. But its ok
to make movies, promote programs in Academia and television that are anti-White?
Is that not hate speech?
This is why these Supreme Court Justices, once put in place, are there for life where the Power
Elite (PE) dont have to worry about these people every 2-6 years like they do in the House and
Senate. They are vetted through the Academic and Political systems by the PE and nominated by
the President. The Supreme Court has not been for a long time, a Justice system. It is 100 percent
political in nature. For those who refuse to believe it, your disbelief will not change the fact that
it is true. The entire system is being run by the PE and any illusion you have that these people are
working on your behalf is just that, an illusion. You may think its benefiting you, but that is only
by chance. Every move these people make is in their favor more than yours!
If you think gays having the right to marry or the slow banning of the Confederate Flag is for
any of you, you absolutely have no idea what is really going on. Your perceived victory is really
a victory for the Oligarchy who are slowly enslaving everyone and destroying the country.
Unfortunately every movement that is happening and has been for 100 years isnt about rights or
freedoms, its actually about taking them away.
With gay rights, gays could get married in 35 states already. There arent many things gays
can do post Supreme Court that they couldnt do prior to the ruling. However, this introduced the
avenue to destroy traditional family values and religion. Next will be pedophilia and polygamy,
How Obama set the tone for a quiet revolution in gay rights
With two lesbians shortlisted for America's Supreme Court and more than 30 gay men
and lesbians appointed to senior posts by the president, the US is witnessing an
unprecedented cultural change that is reshaping politics, media, and popular culture.
Polygamists welcome Supreme Court rulings on gay marriage predicting
relationships with multiple people will be next
Polygamy activists have spoken of their hopes that the Supreme Court's landmark rulings
on gay marriage could lead to a breakthrough for their cause too.
The top court in the U.S. yesterday ruled that the federal government must recognise
same-sex marriages, and allowed judges to overrule a ban on gay marriage in California.
And some polygamists predict that the decisions will 'blaze the marriage equality trail',
saying that 'the nuclear family is not the majority any more'.


White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

Pedophilia, the Next Chapter in the Gay Marriage Court Saga?
Its Time to Legalize Polygamy: Why group marriage is the next horizon of social
Read more: http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2015/06/gay-marriage-decisionpolygamy-119469.html#ixzz3gupJDnVz
Pedophiles want same rights as homosexuals
Using the same tactics used by gay rights activists, pedophiles have begun to seek
similar status arguing their desire for children is a sexual orientation no different than
heterosexual or homosexuals.
Critics of the homosexual lifestyle have long claimed that once it became acceptable to
identify homosexuality as simply an alternative lifestyle or sexual orientation, logically
nothing would be off limits. Gay advocates have taken offense at such a position
insisting this would never happen. However, psychiatrists are now beginning to advocate
redefining pedophilia in the same way homosexuality was redefined several years ago.
In 1973 the American Psychiatric Association declassified homosexuality from its list of
mental disorders. A group of psychiatrists with B4U-Act recently held a symposium
proposing a new definition of pedophilia in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of
Mental Health Disorders of the APA.
Republicans attempted to add an amendment specifying that pedophilia is not covered
as an orientation; however, the amendment was defeated by Democrats. Rep. Alcee
Hastings (D-Fl) stated that all alternative sexual lifestyles should be protected under the
law. http://www.greeleygazette.com/press/?p=11517
That Was Quick Polygamists, Ped*philes Push for Their Civil Rights, Too
President Barack Obama on Gay Marriage
Interviewer: Define marriage
Barack Obama: I believe marriage is the union
between a man and a woman. Now for me as a
Christian it is also a sacred union. Gods in the
Interviewer: Would you support a Constitutional
amendment with that definition?
Barack Obama: No I would not.



White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

Hillary Clinton: "I believe marriage is not just a bond
but a sacred bond between a man and a woman. I have
had occasion in my life to defend marriage, to stand up
for marriage, to believe in the hard work and challenge
of marriage. So I take umbrage at anyone who might
suggest that those of us who worry about amending the
Constitution are less committed to the sanctity of
marriage, or to the fundamental bedrock principle that
it exists between a man and a woman, going back into
the midst of history as one of the founding,
foundational institutions of history and humanity and
civilization, and that its primary, principal role during those millennia has been the raising and
socializing of children for the society into which they are to become adults."
Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama did not flip or have some revelation. If they are TRUE
Christians as they claim, they would never flip. They would have however, put something in place
that allowed civil unions to take place so all gays could marry. But they attacked traditional
marriage instead. And guess what else you did not see on CNN, MSNBC, Mother Jones, Salon, or
Huffington Post? You did not see their so called views on gay marriage covered or criticized.
Then you have the Confederate Flag! Amazing how the liberals can exploit one topic for as long
as they can while suppressing what they dont want their viewers to know. And no doubt Fox
News has aired some of these but did they really push the envelope? Obama and Clinton know 60
percent of the country identify with Christianity which that too is rapidly declining. Knowing
that 60 percent identify with Christianity, of course they played the traditional marriage card. They
LIED to people to get elected! They did what they were told by the criminal masters!
It is said that a good percentage of the people running all of this are pedophiles. Just look at
Hollywood for example!

How do you destroy a country?

If you think the world magically stopped fighting wars or that there arent people out there who
want to run the entire planet and havent and arent actively working to achieve this goal, you are
living in complete denial. Absolute denial. There are different kinds of wars. You dont need to
be dropping bombs or shooting people to be at war. The USA has been at war since day one.
The limits of debate are established in this country before the debate even begins.
Everybody else is marginalized, made to seem like Communists or some other disloyal
person. Kook, theres a word! Now its conspiracy. Theyve made that something that
cant even be entertained for a minute that powerful people might get together and have
a plan? Doesnt happen! Youre a kook, youre a conspiracy buff! George Carlin
The idea of America itself is perfect. The Constitution is nearly flawless. The system of
Government, in the USAs case, a Republic is in fact the best system in the world. But its none

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

of those that are the problem, it is in fact, corrupt and evil people who have infiltrated this system
on behalf of the PE with the sole purpose of stealing as much wealth globally as it can using the
power and might of the US military. A military whose active duty members and vets are
expendable and sacrificed to advance an age old agenda by the PE.
These very same people who have made trillions of dollars off of Capitalism, are the ones
pushing the anti-Capitalism agenda. Why? So they can control it all. They have essentially drained
all the wealth they are going to be able to drain. The world is in a global debt crisis like never seen
before. They dont want people out there inventing things, producing things to the point they have
financial freedom. So in comes Socialism that it will provide for equality. Look at the global
picture, where does Socialism thrive?
Nowhere! Never!
And that is why it is being promoted, to move the 99 percent down to poverty so the ruling
class can completely control them and their access to food and water. You are all going to get a
real nice dose of equality soon!
To any veterans or active duty who read this, do some research and learn where your place is
according to these people. They have false flagged America into every war its been in. They use
your loyalty to the USA against you. They pump you full of patriotism and how you are defending
freedom so you suit up without question and go die for them. You are pawns! Go read about how
the Gulf of Tonkin and Lusitania were both staged or did not even happen. Go read about how
Churchill and Roosevelt knew Pearl Harbor was going to be bombed but allowed it to happen to
bring the United States into the war. How sanctions on Japan forced Japan into war. A war that
produced thousands of millionaires and made millionaires into billionaires and how these very
same PE financed both sides of the war! Then of course there is 9/11! Oh look, we have the War
on Terror now. It can never be won because anyone who opposes World Government will be
considered a terrorist! Including Americans!
What makes a country a country? What makes Japan Japan or China China? Many things
make them what they are. The people of course but what really makes a country strong is its
heritage and celebrating its history. Heritage and history give that country an identity. These
countries are ethnically sound because they are culturally sound. They are not multicultural or
bilingual. They have not lost their national heritage or identity. This is what keeps people united!
Now you introduce press 2 for Spanish into the picture. Now youve just introduced and
promoted a multilingual environment. You have just promoted Dont be American but instead,
enjoy your own culture and we will tear ours down intentionally to accept yours under the umbrella
of equality. Magically, this is only being promoted in Western countries. It is not being promoted
anywhere else in the world. Why? Because although the PE are slowly gaining control of most
governments of the world through sanctions, UN policy, and free trade agreements, they 100
percent control and influence Western countries so putting multiculturalism policies into place is
fairly easy.
The promotion of all cultures are equal is a clever way to flood a country while maintaining
the right to drop the race card. If only most people knew what racism meant! That is why the
people doing this are winning. Because they using 100s of millions of stupid people as soldiers in
their army. And they know it. To say a culture is inferior is not racist or bigoted or anything else.
Most cultures are not equal and never have been. But that is how you weaken the strong cultures.
You overrun it with weak cultures. The United States is rapidly declining because the millions of
legal and illegal immigrants migrating to the USA, actually hate the USA and are coming from

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

poor countries who dont and never have produced anything of note. They are not proud to be
American nor do they want to celebrate its culture or heritage.
Why? Because you have the PE who own and control the Media promoting the idea that Whites
are racist, that the USA was founded on slavery and genocide and that everything was stolen. Its
taught in Academia and the actual truth is slowly being removed from all of the curriculum. One
has to question the intellect of the majority of Americans when they are sold on all of these ideas
by White people. White people are telling you this.
Can you not ask yourself, why would White people promote their own demise? Does it make
sense? It is because of a global agenda and this is just a phase in the agenda. It is one of the final
phases! See the PE cant use minorities alone because that would appear to the White majority as
suspicious, as racist even. So they throw in a lot of White people who have not only sold out White
people, they have sold out the United States of America for a big paycheck. And they have actually
sold out minorities by falsely promoting something that doesnt exist nor ever will. And make no
mistake, a majority of the individuals you see on TV are being paid 6 to 8 digits a year to promote
the demise of the USA. They are lying scumbag sell outs that should be held accountable beyond
the law!
Look at these ridiculous salaries! These same clowns are the ones publically talking about equality,
equal pay, CEO pay, and bashing rich people.
Matt Lauer: $25 million
Jon Stewart: $25-30 million
Bill OReilly: $20 million
Jay Leno: $20 million
David Letterman: $20 million
Sean Hannity: $15 million
Jimmy Kimmel: $10 million
Brian Williams: $13 million
Diane Sawyer: $12 million
Anderson Cooper: $11 million
Shepard Smith: $10 million
Charlie Rosef: $8 million
Al Roker: $7 million
Bret Baier: $7 million
Robin Roberts: $6 million
Piers Morgan: $6 million
Shepard Smith $7-$8 Million
Rachel Maddow $7 Million
Megyn Kelly $6 Million
Ann Curry $5 Million
Scott Pelley $5 Million
George Stephanopoulos: $5 million
Chris Matthews: $5 million
Joe Scarborough: $4 million
Wolf Blitzer: $3 million
Chris Cuomo $2.5 Million

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

Mika Brzezinski: $2 million
Erin Burnett: $2 million
Gayle King: $2 million
Savannah Guthrie: $2 million
Think you might see a reason why 90 percent of their airtime is spent blasting each other, blasting
Bush or Obama or Democrat and Republican policies. Or most of all, race baiting? Their masters
pay them well to stir up hate and keep people distracted and divided. But what they dont actually
spend most of their time doing is telling people real news nor the truth!
Diversity is another way to attack the country.
The mainstream Media and politicians promote we need to end racism yet what is most of their
programming focused on? Race! That is all they talk about. Go to Mother Jones, Salon, CNN, or
MSNBC. Literally article after article after article on a daily basis centers around race and gender.
And Fox News, all they do is talk about Democrats. They dont actually defend Whites against
multiculturalism or White privilege because their masters control the programming!
These stations should not even be called news stations because they almost never talk about
the news. They are in a sense, equivalent to Jerry Springer, the View, and the World Wrestling
Entertaining industry. It is fake news, it is not real news, and they are the National Inquirer meets
the Gossip Girls. It is propaganda and lies. The entire mainstream Media is nothing but
entertainment. Diversity is nothing but a program to place certain people in key positions that
suit the needs of the PE.
Diversity is defined as the state of having people who are different races or who have
different cultures in a group or organization.
Go to Newsbusters.com and look at all the racist programming the left incorporates into its
programing. http://newsbusters.org/issues-events-groups/racism?page=1. Page after page of antiAmerican, race baiting and whining! Go to MSNBC, CNN, Mother Jones, and Salon and just take
a look from a distance. Tell me you dont see countless article after article on gender and race!
But these people think attacking White people all day is going to make race relations better? It
will make them worse, and it will make people despise each other more. I know I despise these
Tabloid channels and their journalists to the point I would love to see them set on fire!
Divide and Conquer
Want to know why Al Sharpton is still employed on MSNBC? Still question that the CIA isnt
involved in the Media? Al Sharpton, busted in the 1980s for money laundering, racketeering,
wire fraud and tax fraud. Hes got tax problems again. NO JAIL TIME! The PE made him an
offer he couldnt refuse. Get on their payroll and start race baiting or go to jail! Guess what he


White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

Sharpton is doing the bidding of his masters and they
are working hard to nationalize the police. Its a matter
of time before they do it also, because people are

Doesnt promoting a given gender or race via a diversity initiative completely go against what the
definitions of equality and discrimination mean? How can you claim to want to improve race
relations when an individual is intentionally promoted based off of race. How can the government
preach equality and equal opportunity when it in itself promotes people solely off of the program
of diversity and affirmative action? Oh, its racism, nothing to do with someone just being less
qualified! Must mean the NBA and NFL are racist!
Equality is defined as the state of being equal, especially in status, rights, and
opportunities. An organization aiming to promote racial equality"
The definition of discrimination is the unjust or prejudicial treatment of different
categories of people or things, especially on the grounds of race, age, or sex
You can also use diversity to target people. Take for instance, the promotion of interracial couples.
This is a sensitive topic but the liberals keep saying they want to have the talk so lets talk about
it. Whom do you typically see promoted constantly in news ads, billboards, in movies, in videos?
The White female and Black male. Do you ever see Black females and Hispanic males or Asian
men and Native American women? Why is 99.9 percent of the promoting of interracial couples
White females and Black males? Why is the Media, Hollywood, and Music industry promoting
this, what is it hoping to achieve?
Obviously there is no political correct way to attack this head on and in the PC society we live
in where people cry about everything, the answer is not going to be popular. The fact of the matter
is, the Black family structure was assaulted when Democrat LBJ, Nixon, and Republican Ronald
Reagan promoted the Civil Rights Movement, War on Poverty, and the War on drugs. Most
cant see it but that is when the Black family structure started breaking down. They broke the
Black family structure down and now they are coming after the Whites.
The CIA and PE are tied to the underground drug trade and many former law enforcement
officers have testified in open court that the CIA traffics drugs into the inner city. Notice the
incarceration rates, especially for marijuana usage among Blacks since the war on poverty and
war on drugs went into effect? Went up 500 percent.
Then you have the middle class which has always been the strength of the United States. A middle
class which was predominately White. Not because of racism, but because of demographics.
Whites have always been a majority ranging from near 80 percent of the population 100 years ago
to 65 percent give or take in 2015. That is a drastic decline in 100 years as well. Is there a White
Genocide going on? I think its a means to an end more than White Genocide.


White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

And part of the agenda which you will read about later is to destroy the middle class and part of
that plan was started by promoting the decay of the family structure. That is why the feminist
movement was pushed. Now you have no parents at home monitoring the children who today are
absolutely lazy, undisciplined and getting dumber. Buying more stuff and running up DEBT so
DEBT slaves could be created.
So you introduce the Black male into the equation. The PE feel that most minorities are inferior
but they promote the opposite. They believe promoting this White female with a Black male is
weakening the White family structure. When you factor in education, true intelligence, cultural
differences, and unemployment that translates into a high probability of there being a broken
family. That now equates into more poverty which translates into dependency on the State which
translates into control. It will further tear down the middle class. Dumbing down society is what
the elite want so they know indirectly promoting Black males into the picture will dumb down the
family structure.
If you want to look at how mind control works and how most people are SHEEPLE, look at the
mass hysteria surrounding Selfies. Many studies have tied it to narcissism and insecurity. Of course
there is ego too but mostly its about getting attention. You the followers, the SHEEPLE, try being
independent for once!

Women and Equal Pay

What about the movement being pushed about women and equal pay? So many people buy into
this BS as well. Has anyone ever stopped to think that there are many variables that go into hiring
people? Has anyone stopped to think that even in an office that has a high male population like in
Information Technology (IT), that all of these men are not making the same salary? Their pay is
not equal either. Some negotiated better. Some came in at a time when a large number of
employees just quit and they need to fill some positions fast. Some have 10 years of experience
where some have none. Some have advanced degrees where others dont. Some have better
interview skills than others. Some negotiate salaries better than others. Some have industry related
certifications that others dont. Out of these men in IT, NONE of them are equal across the board.
If you take all of those factors, one of them is at the top and one is at the bottom and that translates
into the salary disparity.
And that is what makes people work harder, to advance themselves. To advance their pay. The
people on the bottom of the salary structure are not owed the same salary as the people at the top
of the structure. They must earn it and if that means spending nights and weekends going to school
or advancing their knowledge base than that is what they must do if they want to become as equal
to their peers as possible.
But somehow the movement implies that women in the workforce are not paid the same and
therefore its sexism and oppression. Lets say we introduce some women into the equation. Lets
first take a recent college graduate first and make her a minority. The question is, was she the
most qualified among the countless other individuals interviewed or did they hire her because they
needed diversity in the workplace? If they hired her because of diversity they legally
discriminated against all the other applicants. Promoting someone based off of race or gender is
discrimination. If they didnt promote her because of her race or gender, that to would be
discrimination. In the case of diversity in the workplace, the federal government and corporate
America are promoting discrimination as model of business.

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

Lets say they got it right and hired the right person for the job. Does this warrant she make
more than all the men, some of the men, or none of the men? Or should her salary be commensurate
with her education and experience? For those who have never interviewed, you dont have to
accept the offer or you can counter. Almost no one gets their first offer and most corporations will
counter with a given salary in anticipation that the individual will either counter that counter or
accept the offer. Their counter usually has a counteroffer built in. So she says yes to the counter
and that offer puts her in the bottom 10 percent of the salaries that her male peers are earning.
She isnt making more than all of them, or the guy at the top, but she is earning more than several
guys at the bottom. Does that mean she was discriminated against? What about the men who she
earns more than, are they now being discriminated against because they have more experience than
her yet she is making more than they are?
Lets introduce a woman with 10 years of experience and an advanced degree. Does that
warrant her now becoming the highest paid employee? What about all the other factors that come
into play from interview skills, negotiation skills, actual knowledge, industry certifications and
overall IT skills? What about the top 5 guys who might have certifications, advanced education,
mad skills, 10 years of experience, all being with that company since day one. Should she make
more than them? If she doesnt, does that equate to unequal pay?
Equality does not translate into equal pay!
The corporate owned Media and corporate owned Congress are using this to drive salaries down,
not to drive womens salaries up. The question that should be asked is, is there a disparity between
salaries within the same profession and within the same organization?
In order to identify a true disparity the actual major in college and job need to be identified. If
you are going to compare 10 women who got degrees in Communications to 10 guys who got
degrees in computer science or 10 men who got degrees in Sports Nutrition compared to 10 women
who got degrees in Accounting and then complain there is a pay disparity, you are reaching for
something that isnt there. Computer Science pays more than degrees in Communications and that
is because Computer Science is harder and more in demand and not saturated like easy degrees in
Communications are. Same goes with Accounting versus Sports Science Nutrition.
Of course for most, they cant think outside the box or think for themselves. Across the board
as a corporate model, there is no mysterious attack on women or minorities and unequal pay. And
there is absolutely no way imaginable to legislate any type of equal pay laws because everyone is
NOT equal. The only way to create any type of an equal pay structure is to either model the
military or federal government where there are pay scales and within the pay scales, step increases
which is essentially additional pay for each year within the paygrade. Guess what this does? It
creates a society who become content and lazy! If you are for that, why not do it in sports too?
Why does one athlete make $25 million a year when another makes the league minimum? Is that
equality being demonstrated?
This whole equality and equal pay thing is nothing but smoke and mirrors so everyone focuses on
the evil middle class White male where 99 percent of White males are not in the .001 percent.
They are being attacked by the White males in the .001 group so everyone stops paying attention
to them and what they are doing to the country. The White male has become the biggest pawn on
the chessboard so the PE can continue to hijack the country and destroy the middle class while all
the peasants are fighting amongst each other.

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

There is a pay disparity because of education choices, or lack of, skillset, and intelligence. This
equal pay movement is doing nothing but setting the stage for the State to get involved in which
it will remove more freedoms and it will certainly attack middle class employees. It wont impact
CEOs, Presidents, and Vice President in Major Corporations and their salaries or shareholders
and it certainly wont affect Wall Street. Those are the .001 percent! They will not be impacted in
the least bit, in fact, they will benefit because salaries will decline which means a higher profit
margin will exist. A higher profit margin that will allow for larger salaries.
But that can only sustain for so long because soon no one will be able to afford anything. And that
is why they are preparing now. That is why they are strip mining Africa and Mexico and why they
are draining as much wealth and converting it to gold and silver as they can.
Job skills, field of employment and education matter!
Ive seen plenty of diversity or in reality, discrimination against White males. As in my doctors
office. Both where I go to see my doctor and in the office where the blood work is. Out of some
30+ employees, I see TWO men. Both are doctors. The rest of the employees are staff, nurses, etc.
and are all non-male. Is there some form of discrimination going on in that office? Lets take the
CVS I go to. At no point have I ever seen a male working in the pharmacy but I do see a dozen
women working. Is CVS discriminating?
Yet while the feminists and corporate owned Congress promote these programs, why arent
they attacking Wall Street which is like 99.9 percent White males? You dont see Wall Street
targeted do you? That is because Wall Street is in part running things and are owned by the very
same people promoting diversity. Diversity for everyone but them!
This is a two way street people!
Another way they are destroying the country is by promoting an ethnic identity. That is why there
is Jet Magazine, FUBU, Black clothing shops, a Black or Hispanic Caucus or a Hispanic
Chamber of Commerce. There is also the United Negro College Fund, Ebony Magazine, American
Association of Blacks in Energy, the Association of Black Psychologists, National Association of
Black Accountants, Inc., Blacks in Government, National Urban League, National Council of
Negro Women, National Association of Black Journalists, National Black MBA Association,
National Society of Black Engineers, Organization of Black Designers, 100 Black Men of
America, Black Culinarians Alliance, National Association of Black Hotel Owners, Operators, and
Developers. Do you see any White equivalents? Oh, that would be racist right?
This is why Reagan and Jesse Jackson and the hyphenated American movement began. African
American, Hispanic American, Muslim American etc. but no Christian American or European
American. African American now implies that Blacks arent American and forces many to identify
with Africa. Another dividing tactic by the PE. If they wanted unity, there would not be diversity
nor would they de-Americanize the entire minority base. If they wanted unity, people would just
be American.
It is why Whites typically label a legal, US born individual with a Mexican heritage as illegal
or as Mexican. Because most Americans with Mexican heritage call themselves Mexican. In
reality, if they are a citizen or want to be one, they should call themselves American and then the
average person out there would in return not think anything of it. Of course this is just those who
identify as Mexican. Italians and the Irish were big on the ethnic identity too. But PE cant have

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

this, because they absolutely cant tear a country down when Nationalism exists and the ONLY
time they ever use Nationalism or promote America is when they trying sell automobiles or other
products or when they need people to start dying in war so they can profit.
The PE, the people running the banks, corporations and Wall Street couldnt give a rats ass
about America. Their loyalty is to money and power and they use any and every one to achieve
more power and obtain more money.
How do you destroy a country?
You victimize the minority base, get them to dislike the majority and despise the country they live
in. You remove parts of history that displace blame and allow the minority base to blame the
majority, in this case White people, for their failures.
Every shooting that takes place, MSNBC, CNN, Huffington Post, Mother Jones, and Salon, all
use the race card. It absolutely does not matter to them what the evidence is, if the shooting victim
is Black and the cop is White, they will promote and sell it as racism. If the victim is Black and
the shooter is Black, NO coverage. If the victim is White regardless of who the offender is, NO
coverage. ONLY when the shooter is White do they promote race. Do you know what isnt in the
news promoted as hate and racial? These shootings from 2013 to 2015! In Chicago alone. This
does not include Baltimore, Detroit, Los Angeles, or Miami. Barack Obama and Rahm Emanuels
Report: 82 shot, 14 fatally, over holiday weekend in Chicago
It was just one of dozens of shooting scenes across Chicago over the long Fourth of July
weekend. In all, at least 82 people were shot, 14 of them fatally, since Thursday afternoon
when two woman were shot as they sat outside a two-flat within a block of Garfield Park.
Five of the people were shot by police over 36 hours on Friday and Saturday, including
two boys 14 and 16 who were killed when they allegedly refused to drop their guns.
Many of the long weekend's shootings were on the South Side, clustered in the
Englewood, Roseland, Gresham and West Pullman neighborhoods that rank among the
most violent in the city.
The victims ranged from the 14-year-boy shot by police in the Old Irving Park
neighborhood to a 66-year-old woman grazed in the head as she walked up the steps of
her porch on the Far South Side. Most victims were in their late teens and 20s.
10 killed, 55 wounded in Fourth of July gun violence in Chicago
Shootings over the Fourth of July weekend left 10 people dead and 55 others wounded, a
toll lower than last year but one marked by an intense stretch of gun violence over eight
hours on one of the nights.
Mayor Emanuel and CPD Superintendent McCarthy respond July 6, 2015, to another
violent weekend after increased security efforts by Chicago police. The youngest victim
of this past weekends gun violence was a 7-year-old boy; police say the boy's father was
the intended target. (WGN TV)


White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

Among those killed was 7-year-old Amari Brown, shot in the
chest as he watched fireworks near his father's home in
Humboldt Park late Saturday night. Police say they believe the
attack was aimed at the father, whom they described as a
ranking gang member.
Also gunned down was 17-year-old Vonzell Banks, who was
shot as he played basketball Friday at a park named for Hadiya
Pendleton, a high school student fatally shot in 2013 near
President Barack Obama's Chicago home.
The wounded included a 16-year-old boy and a 15-year-old girl shot shortly after
midnight Sunday as they walked in Old Town, and a 19-year-old man shot around 10
p.m. Saturday as two groups fought near Navy Pier after the fireworks display there.
72 Shot in Chicago in Wave of Holiday Weekend Violence
Twelve men were killed and at least 60 other people were wounded in shootings
throughout Chicago during the holiday weekend, including eight people who were shot
in a West Side attack Saturday.

Fourth of July Violence in Chicago: Homicide Rate Passes 200 After Long Holiday
Weekend Of Shootings
The Windy City reached a grim milestone over the long
Fourth of July weekend as the city's homicide rate
surpassed 200.
The city logged its 200th homicide of the year on
Saturday when a 24-year-old man was shot to death in
the 1000 block of West Maxwell Street on the Near West
Side, according to RedEye Chicago.
On Saturday alone, at least seven people were injured in
a single drive-by shooting that left a 48-year-old man dead. The Sun-Times reports police
believe the 6 p.m. shooting in Lawndale was gang-related and connected to an earlier
attack on July 4.
The weekend's littlest victims included 5-year-old Jaden Donald and 7-year-old Christian
Lyles, both shot late night on July 4 in separate incidents.

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and


56 shot, 12 killed in violent Memorial Day weekend in Chicago

At least 56 people were shot over Memorial Day weekend between Friday afternoon and
early Tuesday morning, according to authorities.
Twelve people, including three shot Monday afternoon, died from their wounds. Twelve
others shot between late Monday morning and early Tuesday morning survived their
gunshot wounds, bringing the total of non-fatal gunshot victims for the weekend to 44.
Chicago Gun Violence: 6 Killed, 16 Injured Memorial Day Weekend
Memorial Day weekend ended with six people killed and at least 16 people injured across
the city of Chicago. Among the victims was Dashawn Johnson, 17, who died Sunday
after being shot Saturday in the Washington Heights neigborhood.
On Sunday night, Arron Feazell, 46, was killed in a shooting at the East Garfield Park
neigborhood, according to Chicago Sun-Times. Corteze Reed, 23, was also shot in the
chest Saturday and pronounced dead later that night at a nearby medical center.
More Than 300 People Shot, 37 Fatally, During May in Chicago
More than 300 people were shot and 37 people were killed in shootings throughout the
city during May.
That's an increase in shootings and gun deaths compared to May 2014, when 237 people
were wounded and 36 were slain in shootings.
This May, 46 people in total were slain in Chicago, with 37 dying from gunshot wounds.
At least 108 people shot over three days in Chicago, Baltimore and New York
American cities reach violent new highs over warm Memorial Day weekend as Baltimore
city councilman says: Ive never seen anything like it
At least 108 people were shot across three of Americas most crime-plagued cities during
the holiday weekend, as violent new highs from a nationwide gun epidemic intersected
with outcries over police violence in Chicago, Baltimore and New York.
Chicago, which tends to see a dramatic annual increase in firearm-related homicides
beginning with warm weather at the Memorial Day holiday, experienced the worst
violence. At least 56 people, including a four-year-old girl and three teenagers, were shot
between Friday afternoon and early Tuesday morning, according to the Chicago Tribune.
Twelve people were killed over the three-day weekend, twice as many as during the same
period last year.
According to the Gun Violence Archive, 9,366 people have been injured by gun violence
in America since 1 January 2015, up from 7,145 last year. A total of 4,868 people have
been killed since the first of the year, up from 4,123 last year.
That number includes 1,155 children and teens injured or killed and 486 instances of
defensive gun use.

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

In total, there have been 18,935 incidents of gun violence reported in 2015; among them,
according to the gun-violence site, 1,705 were officer-involved shootings.

They matter ONLY when the Oligarchy can spin it to their advantage and to meet an agenda! I
dont see any of the idiots who are part of the blacklivesmatter movement ever demonstrating in
high violence cities where Blacks are gunning each other down daily. Thousands per year but F
if we arent going to demonstrate because a few criminals were killed by White police officers.
Guess who is promoting #blacklivesmatter? The same PE who own the Media and are dropping
drugs off in the inner cities and promoting gang violence. Do you think they want any attention
drawn to the fact most of the crime is drug related and that most of the firearms are not registered,
like in Eric Holders Fast and Furious gun death scandal?
The PE control 90 percent of the underground illegal drug movement. They
export drugs to every country on the planet. They use their banks to launder this
money and then invest it into stock so they can take over companies around the
world. These people own most shares in most companies around the world to
include foreign companies.
They also control the underground slave trade and are the ones who traffic
children. They also control the international black market for guns.
The very same guns and drugs that find their way into the inner cities and
once in a while, suburbia.


White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and


Guess why Salon, Huffington Post, MSNBC, CNN, and Fox News did not spend more than 30
seconds on these shootings? Downward directed from their masters who are the PE, the .001
percent, the CFR. They could not exploit a White on Black crime, they could not exploit a White
on Black shooting therefore no angle on gun control nor racism. No police were involved so they

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

couldnt exploit their desire to nationalize the police. But how many Blacks, innocent Black
children were shot and killed? With almost no press coverage!
The PE do not want to bring attention to themselves. They dont want people asking why most
of these shootings are tied to gang activity or have to explain how Chicago with the stiffest gun
control laws in the country has gang members who seem to have unlimited access to firearms. Nor
do they want to explain why most of these gang related shootings involve drugs. That would force
them to reveal why the borders are really open, and why the CIA is involved. The borders are
open for a reason people, and its not just to flood the country with 3 rd world illegal immigrants.
Its to move drugs into the country easier, to get everyone hooked on cheap drugs, to increase the
privatized prison population and shareholder and CEO wealth, to increase employment in the
prison system and scary enough, its probably to set the stage for a false flag.
None of you can possibly believe terrorists arent coming across those borders and some with
more than just firearms! These borders are open for a reason!

Blacks are ALWAYS the victim. Victim of shootings, victim of racism, victim of slavery, victim
of poor education, victim of incarceration rates, victim of this, victim of that. Arent Asians,
Native Americans, Hispanics, and White people victims of anything? Is not 99 percent of society
who are having their savings drained, taxed out of their homes, or watched their job shipped abroad
victims of the .001 percent? Message to the Black population, things are getting worse for you,
why? Democrats have implemented countless programs. You have a Black President, Black
Attorney General in the Department of Justice, Black Caucus, Black this, Black that, and its
getting worse! Do you think its middle class America? That the White middle class has that kind
of power that they can influence society? NO, its the White UPPER UPPER .001 class that
controls it all.
But is it Blacks fault they are victims? Not entirely. When you take into account the mind
control techniques such as video game programming, rap and hip hop culture, movies, and most
certainly government programs and the Media constantly reinforcing racism while denying them
the truth, its no more their fault that they think they are victims of historic racism than its my
fault that we are in Afghanistan protecting the Opium crops for the PE.
Quick note on slavery. Slavery is not about race. Slavery is about free labor. Today everyone on
this planet is a slave! You cant own land anywhere without the governments approval and if you
dont pay your taxes, they take your home. You cant hunt unless its hunting season unless you
own land or someone elses unless they own a lot of land and only seasonal in some cases. You
cannot survive in the wilderness as that is illegal.
Just because there arent shackles and chains on 7 billion people doesnt mean they arent
slaves. Slavery is about economics and control of the workforce. But the PE through movies like
Amistad and Roots have planted that seed of hate, making people think it was about Whites
enslaving Blacks instead of it being Wealthy people enslaving poor people.
Instead of holding on to the falsehood of victimology and worrying about being a basketball or
rap star, Blacks need to start focusing on education and identify with America, not African
American America. And dont fall for its a White culture. Its not a White culture, its an
American culture and part of that culture is everyone blends in and identifies and speaks proper
English! Cant say it will happen though, because the Media tells people what to think and as long

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

as the Media and Academia promote White privilege and #blacklivesmatter and victimology, the
course we are heading for will be very destructive.
If you want to release your anger, go find some ultra-billionaires and whip their asses. Go to
the Hamptons, Marthas Vineyard or gated communities and release your frustration. They are the
ones using Blacks against Whites, Whites against Blacks. Blacks attacking the average White
person on a train or in an alley does nothing but strengthen the justification for more surveillance,
more legislation, more gun laws, and it is creating a situation where the government wants to
nationalize the police. Do you want a Gestapo? Because I dont. And that is why they are using
minorities and the labeling the Police as racist. So the People WANT the Government to do
something. Then the Government will step in and claim they can fix it, but the only way it can be
fixed is if its under Federal control. Cant fix it with it so decentralized but the Government, like
it claims with every program, that it will fix it. For you the People!
The government creates the problem and then offers the solution. When are people going to
catch on to this?
How do you destroy the country?
You create made up words like anti-Semitism, racism, bigot, sexist, so that the no matter what the
White middle class says or does, he either goes along with the establishments plan to destroy the
country else he is the evil oppressor, the bigot, the anti-Semite, a racist or a sexist! And of course
they own all the book publishing companies so they can pick and choose what terms make it into
Websters Dictionary. Notice there is no type of language that protects straight people, Christian
people, or White people? And Whites own it, that should tell you something.
Pointing out truth is now hate speech. Because they are burying the truth! The less its spoken of,
the less people will remember it! That is why the forefathers are being attacked as racist old White
men. That is why the Confederate Flag is all of a sudden a major symbol of hate. They need
history gone! But damn if there arent 100s of minority based groups, I guess those arent symbols
of hate? The Confederate Flag is a symbol of RESISTANCE! From Northern aggression. The
south controlled the Mississippi River, access to the Gulf, and Atlantic. The North didnt like!
They also had slaves, it wasnt until they were deep into the Civil War did Lincoln sign the
Emancipation Proclamation. It was a piece of legislation to rally the troops and gain more
public support for continuing in the War. That is it!
"In a time of universal deceit - telling the truth is a revolutionary act." - George Orwell
How do you destroy a country?
You remove its religious identity. You start banning the Ten Commandments and forcing churches
to accept homosexuality or lose their tax exempt status. You start appending hate speech to
anyone who speaks up against this act. Its hate speech if a Pastor or Minister speaks publically
about homosexuality being a sin! But you continue to allow Sharia Law! It clearly violates Church
and State but not if you are the .001 percent because they just use a bought and paid for Supreme
Court to interpret the law exactly how needs to be interpreted in order to benefits them. And
they absolutely want religion gone!


White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

How do you destroy a country?
You promote idolatry, adultery, and exploit sexuality. You promote the decay of morality of
society which by destroying religion, Christianity specifically, kills two birds with one stone. You
use the Klu Klux Klan which was founded by Democrats to incite fear and falsely hide behind
Christianity to further discredit anyone who is against Nationalism, is against immigration, and is
Christian. You remove everything to do with the country! You do this under the false banner of
racial, gender, and financial equality so that no matter who you are, if you question it, you are
labeled a bigot, sexist, or racist.
You promote sex tapes and obnoxious sexual deviance and the people who partake in it. Why
do you think Kardashian and Hilton are in the limelight? Because of their intelligence and
contributions to humanity? No, because they got ******* in a video and have wealthy parents.
This is why they promote Madonna, Miley Cyrus, Katy Perry, Nicki Manaj, Britney Spears, and
Beyonc! Look at all the Pagan and anti-Christian symbology associated with their videos and
lifestyle. Look at all the sexual deviance! Think that isnt an attack on women and religion. They
want to liberate women? No, women are free to do the same thing as men, but what they want is
women to become more promiscuous and break up the family structure so the State becomes the
best alternative for taking over parenthood. They want the State to be your new daddy and mommy
so they can control the child from birth! Common Core vetting your child for servitude!
I just want to close with this statement. If all cultures are equal, why is it that in the last 40 years,
50 million people have immigrated to the USA illegally and illegally of which so far half, from
Reagan to Obama, have already been given Amnesty? Why is it millions come to the United States
legally through the immigration process every year if their culture is equal?
The truth is, the only cultures that thrive or have thrived for 100s of years have been White
cultures and the Japanese. Look at ninety percent of the world outside of Japan and Western
Countries. Still living in the stone ages and most of what they have is a product that was invented
by Westerner or Japanese. It is NOT racist, it is 100 percent fact. If this werent a fact, there would
not be millions upon millions of people coming to Western countries would there? And no,
Western countries did not go into every country in the world and rob people of technology. That
is left wing propaganda and nothing but part of the Communist movement to destroy the United
States. That mindset is part of the breaking down of America to discredit all of the achievements,
mainly by middle class White males. Not the PE!
Lets take one item of history for example. The liberals attempt to exploit the Native American
genocide. Of course the United States Government via being controlled by the OLIGARCHY
commanded the military to keep taking land. But was it White people? It involved White people
but it was the .001 controlled government that did it. And secondly, some history they are trying
to bury, just like Columbus Day, is that DNA and scientific proof exists that White people were in
North America before the Native Americans and that Native Americans were in part, of European
descent. Popular scientific theory and evidence shows Whites were a small group and were
eliminated by Native Americans. But this isnt about Native Americans or their history, it is to get
everyone including Whites to feel guilty about everything so they gradually on board with the
equality movement.


White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

Stone-age Europeans 'were the first to set foot on North America'
Stone-age Europeans were the first to set foot on North America, beating American
Indians by some 10,000 years, new archaeological evidence suggests.
In a discovery that could rewrite the history of the Americas, archaeologists have found
a number of stone tools dating back between 19,000 and 26,000 years, and bearing
remarkable similarities to those made in Europe.
All of the ancient implements were discovered along the north-east coast of the USA.
The tools could reassert the long dismissed and discredited claim that Europeans in the
form of Christopher Columbus and his crew were the first to discover the New World.
Previous discoveries of tools have only been dated back to 15,000 years ago and prompted
many archaeologists and historians to question claims that stone-age man managed to
migrate to North America.
Radical theory of first Americans places Stone Age Europeans in Delmarva 20,000
years ago
Archaeologists have long held that North America remained unpopulated until about
15,000 years ago, when Siberian people walked or boated into Alaska and then moved
down the West Coast.
New evidence suggests Stone Age hunters from Europe discovered America
New archaeological evidence suggests that America was first discovered by Stone Age
people from Europe 10,000 years before the Siberian-originating ancestors of the
American Indians set foot in the New World.
A remarkable series of several dozen European-style stone tools, dating back between
19,000 and 26,000 years, have been discovered at six locations along the US east coast.
Three of the sites are on the Delmarva Peninsular in Maryland, discovered by
archaeologist Dr Darrin Lowery of the University of Delaware. One is in Pennsylvania
and another in Virginia. A sixth was discovered by scallop-dredging fishermen on the
seabed 60 miles from the Virginian coast on what, in prehistoric times, would have been
dry land.
You are certainly not going to be taught that in todays Academic environment because you can
only promote non-White people and victimology! That is exactly why they are trying to remove
Columbus Day and attack it. Of course Columbus did not discover America in the context the
liberals attack him for. The rest of the civilized world had never had interaction with anyone in
the land known today as the United States. He discovered it is more, he is the first to make contact
and then relay what he found to the rest of the world. But dumb people dont get it.
Part of the White privilege movement!


White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

Expendable Pawns
The USA is the financial and military arm of the PE. Financially the country has been drained of
its wealth to the point its not much longer before it collapses. The military is spread thin and in
decline. Between promoting people for the purpose of diversity and gender equality, suicides and
downsizing the military, the PE are removing the last threat within the USA. That being a strong
And no, that is not sexist or racist. Positions are supposed to go to those that are most qualified.
When you use the term diversity as a backdrop to promote people, you are advertising to
everyone that you are bypassing more qualified candidates because a certain quota has to be filled,
all in the name of equality. That being by a less qualified individual. When you do this enough,
you weaken the entire infrastructure. When you want to use equality and stick women on a Special
Forces team yet they cant physically stand toe to toe with individuals who had to pass a far more
difficult test to get to where they are, you have in fact weakened that team. A weak link will
always jeopardize the entire fence! This is across the board, throughout our entire government. It
is in fact being weakened to the point it will not be able to defend itself against the true enemy, the
PE. But no diversity exists in the major banks or on Wall Street!

The Invasion
We are not being invaded by a standing army but instead are being invaded by a massive wave of
uneducated and unskilled immigrants flooding into the USA illegally bypassing the 14th
amendment. Congress and the President by promoting it and not deporting these people are
violating the Constitution, they are breaking the law and violating their oaths of office which one
of their duties is to defend the Constitution! This invasion is not happening because the people at
the bottom of the pyramid are willing it, like they control it. The invasion is happening at the top
of the pyramid by people who want it to happen. Because it is part of the plan to destroy the United
NAACP (National Association for the Advancement of Colored People)
The NAACP was created by White people. The creators of the NAACP, which was created in the
early 1900's, were W. E. B. Du Bois, Ida B. Wells, Archibald Grimk, Henry Moskowitz, Mary
White Ovington, Oswald Garrison Villard, and William English Walling. Perhaps when it was
created there was good intent but just like the banking system, corporations, and Congress, it was
infiltrated and is now controlled by the PE.
The Oligarchy started destroying the USA decades ago and use the NAACP and many other
minority based organizations as avenues to achieve this. They are using the Black hatred for what
is perceived as a White culture and Whites as a means to an end. They use the NAACP, Black
Caucus, and Democrats to keep Blacks as they say, "on the plantation" without them even knowing
it. These groups are a proxy to the PE's goal of destroying the USA from within.
Civil Rights is defined as "the rights that every person should have regardless of his or
her sex, race, or religion".


White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

There is no aspect of the Constitution, neither at the state or federal level that excludes a race, sex,
or religion from any civil right. Just because there is not an equal outcome does not mean there
isn't equal opportunity. In reality, people are not equal. For example, why does LeBron James
make more than John Wall? Is it because one ball club has a bigger budget or is it because one
player is perceived to be better than everyone else? Make no mistake, professional athletes are a
good baseline in which to judge the Oligarchy and society in general.
If there was 'true equality' like liberals feel should exist, ALL professional athletes, musicians,
news anchors, CEO's, etc. would all make the same money. Why is it that they don't? Why
doesnt every player in the NBA or MLB make the exact same amount of money? Or if you want
to use the budget card, why doesn't every player on the Cleveland Cavaliers earn the exact same
salary as LeBron James? The answer is because they are not equal. And that is just a small roster
of personnel. What about 320 million people. Very few of the 320 million people in the United
States are equal. Equality means being 'treated' equal. Equality means having 'equal' opportunity.
Equality does not mean everyone has the same thing, earn the same salaries, or have an equal
In terms of civil rights, the Black Caucus and NAACP are now nothing but a group of race baiters
helping to divide the nation. They are the worst things for the Black population as well. Far worse
than the KKK ever were. There is no longer a need for those groups and that is the only reason
why they exist, to promote hate and division. So the PE through control of Congress can continue
to downsize the middle class, write legislation that deregulates Wall Street, and destroy the
Constitution using race and equality as the theme while giving the appearance of equality.
Everyone has the right to pursue whatever dream they have. Perhaps though, do to 'diversity'
initiatives and 'affirmative action' laws, these civil rights are being violated for non-minority
people! If you are cast aside from a job or college because of a program that is in place that gives
preferential treatment to a race or gender, then there is a civil rights violation.
I know 100 percent the military does it. I know 100 percent states do it like the city of Chicago
with law enforcement. With the military, there are a number of factors that get one promoted but
the main one for enlisted people is taking two tests. Well, because minorities dont score as high
as Whites, the Government reserves 10 percent of the promotions for minorities. So 10 percent of
the White population who scored lower than their White peers but higher than their non-White
peers, dont get promoted. The minorities get promoted even though they have lower overall
scores. Think that isnt DISCRIMINATION?
192 Minority Cops Sue Over Sergeants Exam
The suit alleges the city used a biased consultant, relied too heavily on a written test,
promoted in order of rank, and refused to take affirmative action to minimize the effects
of past discrimination.
More than three-fourths of the minority officers flunked the exam, nearly twice as many
as white applicants, according to the suit. Only three blacks and two Hispanics were
among the first 114 officers promoted since the January exam.
The claim by some city policymakers that black and Hispanic officers didn't study hard
enough "embarrassed and humiliated and upset" each of the 192 plaintiffs, according to
the suit, filed by attorney Kenneth Flaxman.

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and


That is what diversity gets you. It gets you less qualified people and steals jobs from more qualified
people. Imagine a country where you can sue because you simply arent smart enough to pass the
same test your White peers took.
Just another for the White privilege movement!
The USA is Almost Dead!
And make no mistake, the United States is culturally, spiritually, and financially the weakest it has
ever been. And its not because of Republicans or Democrats, but because of Republicans and
Democrats who are equally controlled by the PE. The Government is being run by people outside
the government, by people who are members of societies whose goal is world domination and they
control the corporate and banking structure who control the government.
We are being destroyed from within!
Communist Agenda
You destroy a country from within by not only draining it of wealth, remove income opportunity
by shipping jobs abroad, bringing immigrants into the country, you start attacking every aspect of
what made the country strong. In the case of America, the PE are attacking culture, history,
identity, family structure, religion and everything I just mentioned and they are doing it with a
So that leads us to White privilege.

What is White Privilege?

Wikipedia defines it as: White privilege (or white skin privilege) is a term for societal
privileges that benefit White people in western countries beyond what is commonly
experienced by non-White people under the same social, political, or economic
White Privilege according to Tim Wise who is one of the biggest race baiters out there:
White privilege refers to any advantage, opportunity, benefit, head start, or general
protection from negative societal mistreatment, which persons deemed white will
typically enjoy, but which others will generally not enjoy. These benefits can be material
(such as greater opportunity in the labor market, or greater net worth, due to a history in
which whites had the ability to accumulate wealth to a greater extent than persons of
color), social (such as presumptions of competence, creditworthiness, law-abidingness,
intelligence, etc.) or psychological (such as not having to worry about triggering negative
stereotypes, rarely having to feel out of place, not having to worry about racial profiling,


White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

And I certainly would like to see Tim Wise who is a White Jew taken out into the town circle,
strung up, and set on fire! Hell, if I am every diagnosed with a terminal illness, Tim might
want to sleep with one eye open!
And then there is the definition from Urban Dictionary which is an accurate perception
of what White privilege actually is: The racist idea that simply being white benefits
people in some unexplainable way, and that discriminating against White people is not
only okay, but enlightened and necessary. The excuse some extremists use to justify
pretty much any level of racism, as long as it is coming from people of color. A young
American woman died because in college she was brainwashed into believing that her
white privilege would protect her from being run over by a bulldozer.
If "White privilege" were only a reality, then I'd be a millionaire by now.
And the definition of privilege itself: a right or benefit that is given to some people and
not to others: a special opportunity to do something that makes you proud, the advantage
that wealthy and powerful people have over other people in a society.
So essentially the White privilege movement implies that most White people who are successful
are so because they are White. Or that its because their parents or grandparents or great
grandparents were or are White. It implies that hard work, intelligence, family structure, education,
or making the right choices in life are not a factor for their position in life.
What you could really imply is that almost every wealthy person got to where they are because
of the labor of millions of people and all they did is procure the financing. Most didnt invent or
produce much of anything.
Ever hear of wealth privilege?
How about we identify what discrimination, racism, bigot, and hypocrite mean.
Discrimination according to Webster Dictionary: the practice of unfairly treating a
person or group of people differently from other people or groups of people, the ability
to recognize the difference between things that are of good quality and those that are not,
the ability to understand that one thing is different from another thing. 5
Racism according to Webster Dictionary: poor treatment of or violence against people
because of their race; the belief that some races of people are better than others a belief
that race is the primary determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial
differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race; racial prejudice or
Bigot according to Webster Dictionary: person who is obstinately or intolerantly devoted
to his or her own opinions and prejudices; especially one who regards or treats the
members of a group (as a racial or ethnic group) with hatred and intolerance.


White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

Hypocrite according to Webster Dictionary: a person who claims or pretends to have
certain beliefs about what is right but who behaves in a way that disagrees with those
Kind of see a problem with the hypocrisy of the White privilege after reading these definitions?
When you can focus on White people as being privileged yet create programs like Affirmative
Action, there is a problem in the education system and within the government. The fact a
movement can be pushed which identifies only ONE race (White) as privileged, there is a
problem. In the case of White privilege, the Media, Corporate structure, colleges and universities
are in fact discriminating and in fact and are practicing the art racism. They are attacking ONE
race and in a negative manner! The definition of RACISM includes displaying hatred or
intolerance of another race or other races. Is promoting White privilege in itself racist? Does
it not discriminate?
What if this program was called Jew privilege, Black privilege, woman privilege or
gay privilege? You can guarantee the liberals would be coming out of the woodwork and the
Thought Police would be out in full force arresting people. And by the way, you dont see any
Conservatives standing up and fighting back. Why? Because there is no true Left or Right in
politics, they are one group!
The left is there to fulfill the Communist agenda and the right is there to give the illusion of
hope for those who havent been suckered into liberalism. Fox News exists solely to oppose CNN,
MSNBC and liberalism for the purpose of keeping the people and nation divided. There is no
true Conservative Party whatsoever! It is the Communist Party in which both sides of the fence
are a part of!
Racism is not restricted to Black on White, White on Black, and Brown on Black etc. You can
be Black and racist toward Blacks and White and racist toward Whites. Racism is racism.
Discrimination is discrimination. That makes all the advocates of these programs hypocritical
bigoted racists who discriminate for a living by pushing a racial agenda!

But I Cant be Racist!

For those who buy into the I cant be racist because I am not in a position of authority, you
are only fooling yourself. That is liberal propaganda! Position of authority has nothing to do with
racism. NOTHING! Everyone is in a position of authority to some degree. Every parent is in a
position of authority. Every school teacher, every police officer, every principle, every supervisor
or boss is in a position of authority. What about the people who have to answer to someone above
them who is the same race? Now all of a sudden racism isnt a factor but now but when you inject
a different race into the equation it somehow becomes racist?
Most of the White population are middle and lower income wage earners. What possible
position of authority are they in? They dont control the lobbyists, the Fortune 500 corporations,
the banks, or Wall Street. Which means they dont have a voice in Congress or in the White House.
The President of the United States of America is Barack Obama (Black), the Attorney General
is Loretta E. Lynch (Black), the Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security is Jeh Johnson
(Black), the Secretary Department of Transportation is Anthony Foxx (Black), Department of the
Interior Secretary Sally Jewell (female and Jewish), Secretary for the Department of Commerce is
Penny Pritzker (female and Jewish), The Department of the Treasury is Secretary Jack Lew

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

(Jewish), The Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services is Sylvia Mathews
Burwell (Female), Secretary of the Department of Housing and Urban Development is Julin
Castro (Hispanic), the Secretary of the Department of Labor is Thomas E. Perez (Hispanic).

Is the White House and its Cabinet Racist?

Could we say that Whites are not in a position of authority and thus the programming by
MSNBC, CNN, Common Core, and major universities who push anti-White agendas like White
privilege are discriminating and are racist?
Not directly! Racism is displaying hatred or discriminating against someone because of their
race. Not because of their financial or political position! Not because you dont like them because
they are an idiot, not because you dont agree with their political views or because they broke the
law and you had to arrest or shoot them, but because you flat dont like them because of their race.
White people are not in a position of authority. RICH people are in a position of authority. It
is a small group of a few thousand people in total worldwide. It is the CEOs of major banks. It is
the CEOs of fortune 500 corporations. It is the CEOs of MSNBC, CNN, and Fox News. It is the
major shareholders and board members in the banks, corporations, and Media. It is the United
States Congress, the Supreme Court, lobbyists, and Cabinet. Those are the people who have
positions of authority. They speak on behalf of and serve each other. They do not represent the
majority of the population.
Not White people. A Majority of the .001 percent may be White, but they also control 99.9
percent of the White population who dont control anything and are sacrificing them for their own
agenda. They do it through controlling the job market, legislation, banks, corporations, and the
And this is exactly why Obama and the rest of the cabinet is in place and why minorities are being
put into high level positions. Not because they are qualified, but as an extension of the .001 percent
to keep non-wealth White men in check. They dont even need to do anything now, they have
hateful minorities who think they are getting over and actually running things, in positions over
the average middle class White male now. Puppets at all levels doing the Oligarchys dirty work
for them!
Another way the United States government is racist and discriminates can be seen in the
monthly celebrations. There is Muslim and Jewish History Month but no Christian History Month.
There is Hispanic, Asian, and Black History Month but no White Heritage Month. There is the
LBGT History Month, and there a Women History Month but there is no Straight or Male History
Month. So celebrating all the other months covers everyone but the White Male. It singles out
a specific gender and race! Is that not discriminating? Not racist? It is!
Some say we celebrate White history everyday but once again, that is ignorance in
terminology. History month is meant to teach people about the background of a certain gender or
race. If we are teaching and celebrating a race or gender, everyone but White, that is
discrimination! Culture is what people live every day, not history. Part of the White privilege
movement is to remove American history and heritage, to remove American culture, and to remove
American nationalism. Under the umbrella of equality of course!


White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and


The White Privilege Movement

So when did this movement start? The movement certainly appears to be new as in the last few
years or more specifically during the Obama Administration but it actually dates back to the
1930s. This movement had its first major push in the 1960s. The 1960s have a lot of major
movements that are affiliated with the so called Communist Movement and the White privilege
movement happens to be one of them.
The 1960s movement featured Theodore W. Allen and Noel Ignatiev. Theodore Allen taught
economics at the Jefferson School of Social Science and founded the American Communist Party
in 1944. Allen also wrote a few books to include The Invention of the White Race, Vol. 1:
Racial Oppression and Social Control and The Invention of the White Race, Vol. 2: The
Origin of Racial Oppression in Anglo-America.
Noel Ignatiev graduated from Harvard with a PHD and was a professor at the Massachusetts
College of Arts. Noel was also a member of the Communist Party. Noels family is Jewish and
from Russia. Noel has also attacked Israel under the same pretenses of racism, that it is a racial
state and tried to get the American Jewish Committee to publish his opinions in which they refused
to publish his articles on the topic.
Noel along with Allen and one other likeminded individual attempted to form the Provisional
Organizing Committee with the goal of creating the Marxist-Leninist Communist Party. So here
you have people who are a member of the Communist Party and in Academia who now have
influence over the young minds entering college.
Noel is quoted as saying:
"I regard anti-Semitism, like all forms of religious, ethnic and racial bigotry, as a crime
against humanity and whoever calls me an anti-Semite will face a libel suit.
Noel is also on video saying the following:
If you are a white male, you dont deserve to live. You are a cancer, youre a disease,
White males have never contributed anything positive to the world! They only murder,
exploit and oppress non-whites! At least a white woman can have sex with a black man
and make a brown baby but what can a white male do? Hes good for nothing. Slavery,
genocides against aboriginal peoples and massive land confiscation, the inquisition, the
holocaust, white males are all to blame! You maintain your white male privilege only by
oppressing, discriminating against and enslaving others!
I chalk it all up to white supremacist attitudes. The goal of destroying the white race is
simply so desirable, it boggles the mind trying to understand how anyone could possibly
object to it. Those who object to my advice, knowingly or perhaps unknowingly, are
themselves white supremacists. They wish to go on oppressing and exploiting other races
and maintaining their own privileged positions of power. That is the conscious and
sometimes subconscious motivation of all of my critics. That is why they object to
destroying the cancer of humanity known as the white race. That ugly disease, which
dares to call itself a people and a culture.

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

Obviously, all whites need to be destroyed, but why not start with white males? They
are behind most of historys greatest atrocities. Besides, some of the brothers like to bang
white women. Eventually white women can breed out, but my feeling is that if you are a
white male, you should kill yourself now. If you are a thoughtful person, with a social
consciousness who considers himself white, you will consider suicide. Its the right thing
to do. Let me read you an e-mail that I received today from a xenophobic whitesupremacist.
If I were diagnosed with a terminal illness, I can guarantee this guy goes before I do!
I am sure youve heard that Communists infiltrated the US Government in the 1950s and 1960s.
They infiltrated Hollywood and Academia but isnt this as far as Academia goes, proof?
Of course then you have President Barack Obama whos dad was affiliated with the Communist
Party, was supported by the Communist Party during his presidential runs, has hosted Communist
Party Leaders at the White House, has numerous affiliations with known Communists and of
course attended Harvard University, same as Noel Ignatiev. Same goes with the Bushs who are
supposedly tied to Hitler and Nazi Germany. These people are all tied to someone who are tied to
someone at the top of the pyramid and none of them have the countries best interest at heart.
You can see the inner circle starting to build cant you?
Hopefully you find it disturbing that people like Noel can make it through the Ivy League
system and teach in Academia with that type of mindset. It is somewhat amusing that Noel, a
White Jew male, can hide behind the term anti-Semitism when he does not practice Judaism in
any manner and claims to not be a racist yet calls for mass suicide of an entire racial group. He
doesnt consider himself a racist when in fact, his actions and words exude racism and hatred. And
hes been allowed to voice, preach, and push that hate agenda in Academia. What Noel said is
Hate Speech at its worst!
White privilege is nothing but an extension to the diversity or multi-culturalism initiative!

Source of Hate
So you just read a couple sources of this movement. Graduates from major universities and
professors in Academia. This goes way beyond Theodore and Noel. Today we still have Noel
plus the Communists have added Tim Wise, Al Sharpton, and Jesse Jackson plus the Mainstream
Media, specifically MSNBC and CNN and Academia from Kindergarten to college. Go look at
Congress and half of the Presidential Cabinet. Harvard, Stanford, Yale etc., its where these likeminded people are all vetted for politics and high level CEO positions.
Something else you might notice in the Media. The Left likes to attack Conservatives and Fox
News for not having enough minorities. Isnt that in part the fault of minorities? Most minorities
are on the Democrat plantation so there isnt a lot of people left to swing over to the right. And
secondly, every time a Republican or Fox News hires a minority or promotes a minority, what
does CNN or MSNBC do? Call them House N***ers and sell outs. And then they have their next
topics of discussion to promote more hate for however long it takes before ratings drop.

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

Here are some examples:
Professor: White privilege motivated me to help write Common Core
A professor at New Hampshires Granite State College said he helped craft the nations
Common Core standards because of unearned white privilege.
Dr. David Pook told attendees Monday at the New Hampshire Institute of Politics that
the reason why I helped write the standards and the reason why I am here today is that
as a white male in society I am given a lot of privilege that I didnt earn, the higher
education watchdog Campus Reform reported Thursday.
Common Core if you are not familiar with it, is the curriculum introduced into the schools
nationally during the Obama Administration. Attached to it was a lot of grant money given to the
states if they adopted this curriculum. And considering almost every state in the USA is in heavy
debt, the choice was simple for most of them. In fact, not only is the federal government in debt
trillions, the states themselves are in debt over $4 trillion dollars.
He alone, who owns the youth, gains the future. - Adolph Hitler
And guess who helped fund Common Core? Bill Gates! So this gives you an idea of the level of
influence in which this is being pushed.
Bill Gates Spent More Than $200 Million to Promote Common Core. Heres Where
it Went.
When it comes to putting your money where your mouth is, few organizations can match
the sheer weight of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Longtime education
benefactors, the couple has poured more than $200 million into the Common Core cause
over the last several years. Below is the last few years' worth of individual grants.
So the question of who is pushing White privilege is simple. Its the same individuals who are
pushing #blacklivesmatter. It is the same people pushing racial division. It is the same people
pushing for open borders and has pushed for open borders for 50 years. It is the same individuals
who have implemented free trade and outsourced 10s of millions of jobs. It is the same individuals
who passed the Patriot Act, the NDAA, HealthCare Reform, the Monsanto Protection Act, and
countless other laws and programs.
To understand the White privilege movement and multiculturalism you are going to have to go
way beyond this being about White people. Way beyond this! In fact, this really has absolutely
nothing to do with race in a sense. It is not a short answer, it is not a yes or no answer and the
answer to the question of privilege also answers the bigger questions of what is going on in the
world and who is controlling it.
First you have to know the following:


White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

Who is pushing this the owners, economic factors, Globalization/Free Trade and immigrations,
Banking and Corporate ownership and affiliation, history, unemployment both current and
historical, population growth, and something some people find conspiracy theory which is world
government. Because this is really about the future and the agenda of a handful of people and
nothing else!

The Owners
Who the owners are is not conspiracy theory but it is not common knowledge either. What is
conspiracy theory is the person at the top who controls all of this. No matter what system of
government has ever been in place, there is always one person who has the most influence and
control. There are some disputes as to who is at the top of the chain but everyone else is visible!
The reality of what is going on, who is controlling it, and your place in the bigger picture is
something you are going to have to start dealing with. The world we thought we knew existed is
nothing but an illusion. You can just ignore it, deny it, or dismiss it, but that will not change the
fact that it is real.
Morpheus: The Matrix is everywhere. It is all around us. Even now, in this very room.
You can see it when you look out your window or when you turn on your television. You
can feel it when you go to work... when you go to church... when you pay your taxes. It
is the world that has been pulled over your eyes to blind you from the truth.
Neo: What truth?
Morpheus: That you are a slave, Neo. Like everyone else you were born into bondage.
Into a prison that you cannot taste or see or touch. A prison for your mind
In the case of this quote, you are a slave and are born into bondage. You are born into servitude
and financial debt. You are a debt slave! Unless of course, you are born into wealth privilege!
And I am not really going off topic here. I am going to discuss many things that indirectly have
nothing to do with White privilege but directly have everything to do with it. You just cant see
it but by the time you finish this you will see it!
We can ignore reality, but we cannot ignore the consequences of ignoring reality.
Ayn Rand
He is free to evade reality, he is free to unfocus his mind and stumble blindly down any
road he pleases, but not free to avoid the abyss he refuses to see. Ayn Rand
So who controls this? It is a group of people who control the world and these people own 50% of
the global wealth. They own the big four banks, JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, Citi Group
and Wells Fargo. You also have Goldman Sachs and BNY Mellon. These banks happen to own
controlling stock in the Federal Reserve. If you are not familiar with the role of the Federal
Reserve, in short, it controls the money supply, inflation, and overall strength of the US dollar.

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

These same banks own controlling stock in Exxon, ConocoPhillips, and Chevron. Who needs oil
the most? No, not the civilian population! The Military Industrial Complex! And how do you
create a demand for more oil?
And that is one reason why the war on terror was invented and why a larger war is on the
horizon. It is a reason why the USA is always at war, always spreading Democracy as they say.
Another is to prevent other oil bearing nations, especially from within OPEC and nations that trade
with OPEC from trading oil in other currencies other than the US dollar also known as the
Petrodollar. And from moving away from the organized Central Banking system that is in place
that the Oligarchy control.
BP: U.S. overtakes Russia and Saudi Arabia as largest oil producer

Control the Oil, Control the Nation

Oil was around $1.29 before Desert Storm II. Soon after the USA went into Iraq and Afghanistan,
oil prices tripled. The banks who own the oil companies via their ownership and control over
the Media told us it was because of underproduction or because of obstruction or access to the
oil wells because of Saddam Hussein, Bashar al-Assad, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad or Vladimir
Putin. Or that it was OPEC driving prices up. Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries
or OPEC consist of Algeria, Angola, Ecuador, Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, Libya, Nigeria, Qatar, Saudi
Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and Venezuela.
As of 2015 the United States is the largest producer of oil and natural gas in the world. It
produces more than Saudi Arabia and Russia with a special thanks to fracking which is poisoning
nature. Even before the Iraq war started the United States was the third leading producer of oil and
natural gas. Has the presence in the Middle East been responsible for the rise to #1? In part yes.
Fracking has helped quite a bit as well. The Keystone pipeline that extends from Canada to Mexico
that supposedly Obama has been pushing off is nothing but a political scam for the public. Warren
Buffet has purchased most of the railroad and Koch Brothers are heavily invested in oil. In fact,
the Koch Brothers are the wealthiest oil tycoons in the USA and Warren Buffet is the second
richest person in the USA. One is a Democrat, the other Republicans.
You can guarantee this Keystone Pipeline will be implemented and will only benefit the ultrawealthy and the military industrial complex but not the United States or the middle or lower
classes. The Keystone Pipeline might very well be Hillarys ticket into the White House. Because
as much as she has f***** up with everything else, its going to take a miracle to bail her out.
Then again, that miracle might just be low intelligence and anti-Republicans who dont care.
The graph below represents what each country produces in terms of (millions of barrels per
day). Kind of see why they went after Iraq and Venezuela? Or why they are going after Iran now?
Or went after Gadhafi? Or why NAFTA was pushed which includes Mexico? Or why they are
going after Russia or why there just happens to be instability in Ecuador and Nigeria? All oil
bearing nations.


White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

USA Saudi Arabia

Russia China Canada








Saudi Arabia Russia China Canada


Iran Venezuela UAE


Mexico Norway

Control oil and you control nations; control food and you control the people. Henry
If the USA is the worlds largest producer of oil and natural gas, why has the cost of both doubled,
tripled, and in some cases quadrupled? Why are we exporting 50% of our oil?
If you havent seen the series The Men Who Built America, its about Americas Industrial
Revolution. Its about the Rockefellers, Carnegies, Vanderbilts, Henry Ford, and J.P. Morgan.
In the series, something that Rockefeller did in the 1800s to starve out his competition is being
done today to drive prices up. Rockefellers competition were competing railroads who interfered
with this shipment of kerosene and later oil. They owned certain routes and started monopolizing
other routes and started charging him far more for transport than his business would a lot for. He
could not sell the product for profit when he included the refining and transport costs. At that point
though, the railroad owners had become too dependent on the prices they were getting for the
shipping of oil and kerosene. For a while Rockefeller had to play ball. Once they became
dependent he shut down his refineries. So almost NO oil or kerosene was being shipped.
Eventually this bankrupted most of the railroad companies in which he began to buy them up for
pennies on the dollar. Along with that he started pipelines which were more economical to
transport his oil.
So the gist of that story is, the oil producers in the USA have shut down most of the US
refineries. Only a fraction of the refineries that once existed now exist in 2015. With a growing
demand for natural resources does that make sense? Of course not. This isnt about common sense,
this is about money and control.
The greatest profit comes from both cheap labor and tax avoidance. The USA can ship its oil
and have it refined outside the USA and that oil is refined in countries that are members of free
trade agreements where they pay laborers 1/10th of what they pay Americans. It also refined in
non-free trade countries which is in part why there is a trillion dollar trade deficit. Then they ship
it back to the USA because there is no import tax. Nor are the profits declared within the USA so
there are no state, federal, or Medicare taxes paid on the import. Once again at the expense of
1,000s of middle class jobs. Once again at the expense of the economy and the people.
Then there is probably the #1 culprit, the banks. After all, how did most of these companies
get their initial capital to expand? Some with shareholders and most through loans. Bank loans!
And legislation which Congress pass under the guise of Agenda 21 which includes the green
agenda where they tell you its for the environment when that has very little to do with it.
These same banks own controlling shares in a majority of the Fortune 500 corporations.
JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, Citi Group, Wells Fargo, Goldman Sachs and BNY Mellon
own the Federal Reserve and are owned by each other.

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

Think of it this way, as if you are the investor in the game of Monopoly. Pretend these banks are
on the board rather than hotels. And pretend at the end of the game you win and own them all.
You are essentially the controlling shareholder for six banks but to everyone else, it just looks like
six different banks. Now imagine that scenario in the real world but instead of you, its just a few
thousand people. That is exactly how it is and you will never get the identity of the major
individual shareholders in each of the investment companies unless they intentionally disclose the
You will never know who the major shareholders are in Vanguard, State Street, Black Rock,
Fidelity, Citigroup Inc, Bank of America 401K plan. And you will never know who owns
controlling shares in the Federal Reserve. When someone can get the answer to those questions
that is when accountability can be administered! Some have a good idea who owns them though
and I will disclose that at the end. The people you see as the world richest are not the worlds
richest. The worlds richest have their money tied up in foundations and have never disclosed
their true wealth and never will. They have their wealth hidden in Swiss accounts and other tax
havens. The only people they went after when they gave the appearance of going after tax evaders
were people who posed a threat to this agenda. They did not go after the people at the top! Buffet,
Soros, the Koch Bros, Gates, the Waltons are very wealthy, but they are not the wealthiest and
are not at the very top of the pyramid.
Bank of America
Vanguard Group, Inc.
State Street Corp
BlackRock Fund Advisors
Fidelity Management and Research Company
Northern Trust Investments, N.A.
Dodge & Cox
T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc.
J.P. Morgan Investment Management Inc.
Geode Capital Management, LLC
Wells Fargo Bank NA


JP Morgan
Vanguard Group, Inc.
State Street Corp
BlackRock Fund Advisors
Fidelity Management and Research Company
Capital World Investors
Wellington Management Company, LLP
T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc.
Northern Trust Investments, N.A.
The JPMorgan Chase 401K Svgs Plan
BlackRock Advisors LLC
Columbia Management Inv Advisers, LLC
Geode Capital Management, LLC
Harris Associates L.P.


White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

Mellon Capital Management Corporation


Vanguard Group, Inc.
State Street Corp
Fidelity and Research Company
BlackRock Fund Advisors
Capital World Investors
Wellington Management Company, LLP
Northern Trust Investments, N.A.
J.P. Morgan Investment Management Inc.
T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc.
BlackRock Advisors LLC


Wells Fargo
Berkshire Hathaway Inc
Vanguard Group, Inc.
State Street Corp
Fidelity Management and Research Company
BlackRock Fund Advisors
Capital World Investors
Wellington Management Company, LLP
Columbia Insurance Company
Dodge & Cox
Northern Trust Investments, N.A.
J.P. Morgan Investment Management Inc.
Davis Selected Advisers
T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc.
BlackRock Advisors LLC


Goldman Sachs
State Street Corp
Capital World Investors
Vanguard Group, Inc.
Citigroup Inc.
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
BlackRock Fund Advisors
Dodge & Cox
Northern Trust Investments, N.A.
Invesco Advisers, Inc.
Fidelity Management and Research Company
Alliance Bernstein LP
Mellon Capital Management Corporation



White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

Morgan Stanley
Mitsubishi UFJ Kokusai Asset Management Co
State Street Corp
Vanguard Group, Inc.
Fidelity Management and Research Company
T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc.
BlackRock Fund Advisors
Eagle Capital Management LLC
Invesco Advisers, Inc.
Jennison Associates LLC
Templeton Global Advisors Limited
J.P. Morgan Investment Management Inc.
Capital World Investors
Northern Trust Investments, N.A.


And I want to make a point about the intertwined ownership. Take for instance, Mitsubishi UFJ
Kokusai Asset Management Company who owns over 430,017,000 shares in Morgan Stanley.
Most claim that the US corporations sold out to foreign interests but is that really the case?
Mitsubishi UFJ Kokusai Asset Management Company major shareholders are.. You got it,
Vanguard, Fidelity, BlackRock, JPMorgan and so on. These people control every country and
their economy.
WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity ETF
Dodge & Cox International Stock
Vanguard Total Intl Stock Index Investments
Vanguard Wellington Investments
Vanguard Developed Markets Idx Admiral
Fidelity Diversified International
Fidelity Series International Value
BlackRock Global Allocation Investments B
Fidelity International Discovery
VA CollegeAmerica Cap World G/I 529E
BlackRock EAFE Equity Index T
Vanguard Pacific Stock Index Investments
Fidelity Spartan International Idx Investments
Deutsche X-trackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Eq
BlackRock MSCI EAFE Equity Index
JPMorgan International Value I
JPMorgan Income Builder A


Bank of NY Mellon
Davis Selected Advisers
Dodge & Cox
Vanguard Group, Inc.
State Street Corp
Southeastern Asset Management Inc.


White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

BlackRock Fund Advisors Arnhold & S.
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.


To understand who owns the banking cartel, who owns the Media, most of the Fortune 500, and
is behind everything going on today you should understand something about the Federal Reserve.

The Federal Reserve System

Allow me to control the issue and the nation's money and I care not who
makes its laws!" - Amschel Rothschild
The Federal Reserve is NOT federal. It is a privately owned institution.
. To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, and fix the Standard of
Weights and Measures - U.S. Constitution - Article 1 Section 8
The American Revolution had very little to do with Freedom of Religion. That is a historic lie that
has been used for centuries to rally the troops to war under Christianity and fighting the enemy of
Christianity. All the historic quotes from Washington, Madison, Jefferson, Franklin, Jackson,
Lincoln etc., most of them speak about maintaining firearms to defend freedom and against the
banking system. Almost none of their quotes or concerns speak of religion.
It was about separating from the control of a Monarchy and taxation; it was a struggle to wrestle
control of wealth from the Bank of England and to restore the centers of power to the People where
it "properly belongs." The Bank of England is a central bank said to be under the control of the
British Crown and European Monarchy and even the Vatican. The Constitution is specific on a
number of laws including the authority of the People, through their elected officials, to control the
money and thus, the affairs of their government.
In his autobiography, Ben Franklin said that the inability of the colonists to issue their own
money permanently and take control out of the hands of George III and the international bankers
was one of the primary reasons for the Revolutionary War.
Our forefathers did want religious freedom, in part because they were high level Freemasons.
The highest levels of Freemasonry do not practice Christianity, Judaism, or Islam per se, they are
said to practice the Kabbalah which is ancient.
Almost no mention of religion exists historically and God is mentioned very few times in the
Constitution itself. The country was founded on Christian principles but the people controlling
everything are not Christian. Theyve used Christianity, Judaism, and Islam as pawns in their
game. Instruments of destruction. To justify countless war! Zionists!
When the Bushs, Obama, Pelosi, Clintons all tell you they are Christian, they are lying. Do
Christians drone innocent people or start wars?
" If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of currency, first
by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them
will deprive the people of all property until their children will wake up homeless on the
continent their fathers conquered." - Thomas Jefferson


White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

This Federal Reserve Act establishes the most gigantic trust on Earth. When the
President Wilson signs this bill, the invisible government of the Monetary Power will be
legalized... the worst legislative crime of the ages, perpetuated by this banking and
currency bill." - Congressman Charles A. Lindbergh
What about placing sanctions on countries in order to spread democracy with the impact of those
sanctions killing 100s of thousands of innocent civilians; does that sound like a Christian principle?
Sanctions arent placed on a country because of supposed UN violations, they are placed on
countries who do not comply with the World Government agenda. Those that dont want to play
ball. Those that dont want to give up their sovereignty and control. Those who dont want central
banking in their country!
All of these politicians, the Republicans, televangelists, Joel Olsteen, are all misrepresenting
Christianity and that is part of the reason for its decline. People associate hypocrisy and pedophilia
with Christianity when its really just corrupt and moral less people whove infiltrated and
misrepresented the religion.
A 60 Minutes interview in 1996 between Madeline Albright and Lesley Stahl on U.S. sanctions
against Iraq:
We have heard that a half million children have died. I mean, thats more children
than died in Hiroshima. And, you know, is the price worth it? - Lesley Stahl
I think this is a very hard choice, but the pricewe think the price is worth it. Madeline Albright
None of these phonies are Christian, none of them. They identify within a certain denomination
through birth just like Jews do but they are not true Christians. They all lie, cheat, steal, and kill
for a living.
Napoleon turned against them in the last years of his rule. And remember this statement and
action, there is more to this than just Napoleon.
When a government is dependent upon bankers for money, they and not the leaders of
the government control the situation, since the hand that gives is above the hand that
takes. Money has no motherland; financiers are without patriotism and without decency;
their sole object is gain." - Napoleon
The Federal Reserve System known as the Federal Reserve or Fed was created on December 23,
1913 and is the central banking system of the United States. It is controlled through the
International Monetary Fund (IMF) and World Bank. The Bilderberg Group and Council on
Foreign Relations set create a lot of the policies that the UN implements. The Federal Reserve was
created largely in response to a series of financial panics which those financial conditions were
intentionally created to justify the creation of the Federal Reserve. The Federal Reserves role was
expanded after the Great Depression. Still, the central banks were essentially powerless without a
tax system, hence why the personal income tax was introduced. The United States Revenue Act
of 1913 was created later that year which imposed a personal income tax on the American people
and we have had one ever since. It takes a lot of money to sustain a Nanny state where jobs are

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

fewer and fewer and it takes a lot of money to fund the trillion dollar military industrial complex!
And an enforcement arm was needed to collect money to pay the Federal Reserves interest
The United States Revenue Act of 1913 is the tax enforcement arm of the Federal Reserve.
Countless bills have passed that have allowed the Federal Reserve more control over the American
financial system and thus the economy. Legislation like the Community Reinvestment Act that
was advertised as helping minorities when it fact Congress used minorities as the selling point to
deregulate the Federal Reserve and Wall Street. They used minorities to pass Patient Protection
and Affordable Care Act (PPACA), or Affordable Care Act (ACA) known as TeddyCare or
ObamaCare. Who got involved? The IRS! ObamaCare has very little to do with healthcare. It has
everything to do with control and robbing middle class wealth.
If healthcare was the true issue, they would have expanded Medicaid and Medicare to cover
anyone who didnt previously qualify. Now we have ObamaCare, Medicare, and Medicaid which
in reality makes no sense. ObamaCare was put into place to incorporate the IRS into the scene so
more taxes could be extracted from small businesses and the middle class.
One of the reasons for the White privilege movement!
Note: The Federal Reserve Act and Revenue Act of 1913 were introduced, passed, and
signed by a Democrat House of Representatives, a Democrat Senate, and a Democrat
Feds Holdings of U.S. Gov't Debt Hit Record $1,696,691,000,000; Up 257% Under
For the first time ever, real federal tax revenues topped $1 trillion in the first four months
of the fiscal year--October through January--according to data released Wednesday by
the U.S Treasury.
Federal tax revenues hit a record $1,046,224,000,000 for fiscal year 2015 through
January, according to the Monthly Treasury Statement, but the federal government still
ran a $194,209,000,000 deficit during that time.
$1.89T: Tax Revenue for FY15 Hit Record Through April--Gov't Runs $282B
Inflation-adjusted federal tax revenues hit a record $1,891,601,000,000 for the first seven
months of the fiscal year this April, but the federal government still ran a
$282,766,000,000 deficit during that time, according to the latest Monthly Treasury
Each month, the Treasury publishes the governments total receipts, including all
revenue from individual income taxes, corporate income taxes, social insurance and
retirement taxes (including Social Security and Medicare taxes), unemployment
insurance taxes, excise taxes, estate and gift taxes, customs duties, and miscellaneous
In constant 2015 dollars, the $1,891,601,000,000 that the federal government collected
from October through April in fiscal 2015 was $171,331,540,000 more than the
$1,720,269,460,000 it collected in October through April in fiscal 2014.


White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

The Treasury has been tracking these data since 1977 and at that time the federal
government collected $757,919,660,000 in inflation-adjusted revenue in the first seven
months of fiscal 1977. This means that since then, revenues have more than doubled,
increasing by 149.6 percent.
The Federal Reserve is now the biggest holder of Debt, exceeding China. The Federal
Reserve as of 2014 holds over $2 trillion dollars of the governments debt which we the
taxpayer pay on via taxes. We pay taxes and they earn interest on manufactured money.
Feds set tax haul record: $472B in one month
The federal government set a record tax haul in April, taking in nearly a half-trillion
dollars in one month alone, according to Congressional Budget Office statistics released
April is always a busy month with the tax deadline on April 15, but this years haul was
historic, totaling $472 billion, far outstripping the previous monthly record, set last April,
of $414 billion.
Do you think this is because the PE or corporations are paying more taxes? No, its the poor and
middle class paying more taxes and most of all, its the ObamaCare taxes kicking in. Taxes the PE
pay very little into!
The Federal Reserve has the greatest power over the U.S. economy. It was established to oversee
the banking panics that occurred in the 1900s. It traces its roots back to 1791 when the First Bank
of the United States was formed and headquartered in Philadelphia where the bank managed to get
a 20 year charter. It failed when people lost trust in it leading to establishment of the Second Bank
of the United States. Andrew Jackson who proclaimed I killed the bank let the Second Bank
of the United States charter expire thus ousting the Aristocracys hold on Americans. And this is
exactly why MSNBC and CNN are attacking him and want to remove him from the $20 dollar
bill. It reminds those criminals that someone stood up to them and won!
The role and duties of the Federal Reserve have greatly expanded over the years which now
include managing the nation's monetary policy, supervising and regulating banking institutions,
maintaining the stability of the financial system and providing financial services to depository
institutions, the U.S. government, and foreign official institutions. These roles were also expanded
greatly as a result of deregulation from Carter to Bush. Most of this deregulation led to the housing
Sold Out!
The elite did not rest until they had their central bank. For a few years prior to the Federal Reserve
Act being passed, people like Senator Nelson Aldrich, Arthur Shelton, J.P. Morgan, Paul Warburg,
Frank Vanderlip, David Kuhn, Solomon Loeb and Henry Davison who was a Skull and Bones
member, like John Kerry, Prescott Bush, George H.W. Bush, and George W. Bush were, promoted
the creation of a Federal Reserve.

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

It is well enough that the people of the nation do not understand our banking and
monetary system, for if they did, I believe there would be a revolution before tomorrow
morning." - Henry Ford, Founder of the Ford Motor Co.
Forbes knew of this secret meeting that took place on Jekyll Island to discuss the Federal Reserve
and later wrote in his book, Men Who Are Making America and Illuminates
"Picture a party of the nations greatest bankers stealing out of New York on a private
railroad car under cover of darkness, stealthily hieing hundreds of miles South,
embarking on a mysterious launch, sneaking onto an island deserted by all but a few
servants, living there a full week under such rigid secrecy that the names of not one of
them was once mentioned lest the servants learn the identity and disclose to the world
this strangest, most secret expedition in the history of American finance. I am not
romancing; I am giving to the world, for the first time, the real story of how the famous
Aldrich currency report, the foundation of our new currency system, was written . . . . The
utmost secrecy was enjoined upon all. The public must not glean a hint of what was to be
done. Senator Aldrich notified each one to go quietly into a private car of which the
railroad had received orders to draw up on an unfrequented platform. Off the party set.
New Yorks ubiquitous reporters had been foiled . . . Nelson (Aldrich) had confided to
Henry, Frank, Paul and Piatt that he was to keep them locked up at Jekyll Island, out of
the rest of the world, until they had evolved and compiled a scientific currency system for
the United States, the real birth of the present Federal Reserve System, the plan done on
Jekyll Island in the conference with Paul, Frank and Henry . .Warburg is the link that
binds the Aldrich system and the present system together. He more than any one man has
made the system possible as a working reality." - B.C. Forbes founded Forbes magazine.
I have unwittingly ruined my country - Woodrow Wilson
Additionally, the Federal Reserve, its members and shareholders started buying up the Media in
the 1930's and to this day own or significantly influence most of it. In fact, in 1983 there were
around 50 different Media companies. As of 2015 there are six. They are Time Warner, Disney,
News Corporation, Bertelsmann of Germany, and Viacom (formerly CBS) and their control spans
most of the newspapers, books, magazines, movie studios, radio and TV stations, ISP, and much
of the web news content of the United States. These six corporations own 1,500 newspapers, 1,100
magazines, 9,000 radio stations, 1,500 TV stations and 2,400 publishers. Together they own 90%
of the Media! Just over 270 executives profit off of the insanity they create!
Banking Act of 1935, U.S. Senate, 74th Congress, 1st Session, on 15, May 1935, hearings
before a Subcommittee of the Banking and Currency Committee:
The Federal Reserve System is in the wrong hands, no Constitutional republic can
function when the government's money powers are in the hands of the financial oligarchy
such as New York financiers.
The people who created the Federal Reserve knew once it was created, they controlled the country,
the government, and the people and they intentionally steered the USA into war to force the U.S.

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

government to have to borrow, thus creating debt. When the creation of the Federal Reserve and
what later became the Internal Revenue Service happened, a bunch of families and individuals in
the banking cabal were given control of the monetary system, inflation, interest rates, and taxes,
they now controlled the peoples debts. The government does not control the Federal Reserve and
Janet Yellen answers to someone else above the President of the United States! And that is just
another reason why the Federal Reserve is never audited and why no one goes to prison.

So who owns the Federal Reserve?

The stockholders in the 12 regional Federal Reserve Banks are the privately owned banks that fall
within the Federal Reserve System which also contains all national banks chartered by the federal
government as well as state chartered banks that meet the requirements. Nearly 40% of those 8,000
banks are part of the Federal Reserve System. If you go to the Federal Reserve site, they will say
they are a private corporation not owned by anyone and that all profits go back to the U.S. Treasure.
- In 1970, the five largest U.S. banks held 17 percent of all U.S. banking industry assets.
- In 2013 the five largest U.S. banks hold over 50 percent of all U.S. banking industry assets.
Each of the regional branches within the Federal Reserve are in fact, incorporated but the shares
are not publicly traded but instead are privately traded and not really traded as the ownership in
stock by the few major commercial banks never changes hands. In fact it is highly likely at this
point they are willed to a trust rather than a single individual or bank itself in order to protect the
identity of the actual owners.
The Federal Reserve has publicly admitted that it is privately owned. When it was defending
itself against a Bloomberg request for information under the Freedom of Information Act, Alan
Greenspan of the Federal Reserve stated The Federal Reserve is not an agency" of the federal
government and therefore not subject to the Freedom of Information Act.

Who are the banks with the largest ownerships?

Bank of America, JP Morgan Chase, Citigroup and Wells Fargo are said to be the larger corporate
American shareholders in the Federal Reserve. These same four banks have the largest stake of
ownership in the major oil companies like Exxon Mobil, BP, Royal Dutch/Shell, Chevron and
Texaco who are also owned by Deutsche Bank, (Banque Nationale de Paris), Barclays and other
European banks that are tied to old money.
Old rumors are that Jacob Schiff, James Stillman, William Rockefeller, and Paul Warburg who
helped create the Federal Reserve were the original owners and that later turned into Goldman
Sachs, Rockefellers, Lehman Brothers, Kuhn Loebs of New York; the Rothschilds of Paris and
London; the Warburgs of Hamburg; the Lazards of Paris; and the Israel Moses Seifs of Rome.
Only a few know who is the true owner or owners but its highly unlikely any of these names are
actually affiliated in any other capacity than a proxy between the bank and the real owners.
These people may have at one point appeared to own the banks but most certainly they were
front men for the European Oligarchy which some refer to as the Pharistrocracy. Old money that
some speculate was accumulated for thousands of years when Whites ruled in Egypt and everyone
else was a slave, including Whites. It is said this ruling class was eventually driven out because

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

the slave labor in part died off and also goes along with Biblical ties where Moses lead the slaves
out of Egypt. This is what some call the Illuminati and their bloodlines. Illuminati kind of being
marketed but whether that is what these people go by or not remains to be seen but there certainly
is a ruling class in the background.
We could find out 100 percent if The United States Chamber of Commerce would release the
information but it will not release current individual shareholders and the banks and Federal
Reserve will not release any of the Charter or stock information. And there is no doubt with how
the stock is so inter-owned by investment after investment company of which many are not
American, you would need an international court and Interpol and everyone else involved to find
out where that money is being syphoned off too! Congress will not intervene in obtaining that list
but some believe the list of names is affiliated with both American old money and European
There are many other groups involved, front groups, front men/women that its mind boggling
but the claim is it goes back to these 25 families.
of the Netherlands

Prince Michael
of Kent

Prince Edward
Earl of Wessex

Prince Philip,
Duke of Edinburgh

Hans-Adams II
Prince of Liechtenstein

Prince William
Duke of Cambridge

Carl XVI Gustaf


Princess Mabel

Harald V


White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

Prince Constantijn
Of the Netherlands

Prince Edward
Duke of Kent

Queen Sophia
of Spain

Abdullah II
Of Jordan

Vittorio Emanuele
Prince of Naples

Duke of Parma

Of the Netherlands

Prince Charles
of Wales

Prince Andrew
Duke of York

Infanta Cristina
Duchess of Palma
De Mallorca

Archduke Sigismund
Grand Duke of


of Belgium

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and


Elizabeth II

Prince Lorenz
Of Belgium
Archduke of

Hassanal Bolkiah
Sultan of Brunei

Juan Carlos I of Spain

Besides the obvious, that they are White, notice anything unusual? Royalty. Setting up the Feudal
system ensured they never lost control of the country. Not through fee elections, not through
popular vote. Bloodlines! These families date back to the beginning of European settlement. I
would recommend doing a little research. Whether you believe these people run it or not doesnt
matter. Look at the state of those countries and Europe and the USA in general! They are being
destroyed. These people are responsible for the destruction and rape of their countries. They are
responsible for the raping of the women from third world scumbags and murder of White males.
Whether someone is above them, they should be held accountable however you look at it.
People who live off of the serfs and collect massive salaries for doing nothing but waiving their
hand, for doing nothing more than being born into wealth!
When there are those researchers who believe all of these people and banks are just proxies or
agents acting on behalf of a controller that is not obvious. Some claim its Prince Bernhard of the
Netherlands, some say the English Monarchy, some say the Vatican, some say the Nazis, and some
say the Jews. Some say its all of them. None of that really matters, what does matter is all the
banks and corporations are intertwined and inter-owned to the point its essentially one group.
There isnt one owner of this but there is a ruler. There is always one person!
When the Fed was created five New York banks,
Chemical Bank
Manufacturers Hanover
Bankers Trust,
...held a 43% stake in the New York Fed.


White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

By 1983 these same five banks owned 53% of the NY Fed. By year 2000, the newly merged
Citigroup, JP Morgan Chase and Deutsche Bank combines owned even bigger chunks, as did
the European faction of the Eight Families. Collectively they own majority stock in every
Fortune 500 corporation and do the bulk of stock and bond trading. In 1955 the above five banks
accounted for 15% of all stock trades.
By 1985 they were involved in 85% of all stock transactions.
Still more powerful are the investment banks which bear the names of many of the Eight
In 1982, while Morgan bankers presided over negotiations between Britain and Argentina after
the Falklands War, President Reagan pushed through SEC Rule 415, which helped consolidate
securities underwriting in the hands of six large investment houses owned by the Eight Families:
Goldman Sachs
Merrill Lynch
Morgan Stanley
Salomon Brothers
First Boston
Lehman Brothers
These banks further consolidated their power via the merger mania of 1980s and 1990s.
American Express swallowed up both Lehman Brothers-Kuhn Loeb - which had merged in 1977
- and Shearson Lehman-Rhoades. The Israel Moses Seifs Banca de la Svizzera Italiana bought
a 7% stake in Lehman Brothers.
Salomon Brothers nabbed Philbro from the South African Oppenheimer family, then bought
Smith Barney. All three then became part of Travelers Group, headed by Sandy Weill of the
David-Weill family, which controls Lazard Freres through senior partner Michel David-Weill.
Citibank then bought Travelers to form Citigroup.
S.G. Warburg, of which Oppenheimers Chartered Consolidated owns a 9% stake, joined the
old money Banque Paribas - which merged into Merrill Lynch in 1984. Union Bank of
Switzerland acquired Paine Webber, while Morgan Stanley ate up Dean Witter and purchased
Discover credit card operations from Sears.
Kuhn Loeb-controlled First Boston merged with Credit Suisse, which had already absorbed
White-Weld, to become CS First Boston- the major player in the dirty London Eurobond market.
Merrill Lynch - merged into Bank of America in 2008 - is the major player on the US side of
this trade.
Swiss Banking Corporation merged with Londons biggest investment house S.G. Warburg to
create SBC Warburg, while Warburg became more intertwined with Merrill Lynch through their
1998 Mercury Assets tie up. The Warburgs formed another venture with Union Bank of
Switzerland, creating powerhouse UBS Warburg.


White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

Deutsche Bank bought Bankers Trust and Alex Brown to briefly become the worlds largest
bank with $882 billion in assets. With repeal of Glass-Steagal, the line between investment,
commercial and private banking disappeared.
This handful of investment banks exerts an enormous amount of control over the global
Their activities include advising Third World debt negotiations, handling mergers and breakups,
creating companies to fill a perceived economic void through the launching of initial public
stock offerings (IPOs), underwriting all stocks, underwriting all corporate and government bond
issuance, and pulling the bandwagon down the road of privatization and globalization of the
world economy.
A recent president of the World Bank was James Wolfensohn of Salomon Smith Barney. Merrill
Lynch had $435 billion in assets in 1994, before the merger frenzy had really even gotten under
way. The biggest commercial bank at the time, Citibank, could claim only $249 billion in assets.
In 1991,

Merrill Lynch handled 26.8% of all global bank mergers

Morgan Stanley did 16.8%
Goldman Sachs 16.3%
Lehman Brothers 16.1%
Credit Suisse First Boston 14.5%

Morgan Stanley did $60 billion in corporate mergers in 1989.

By 2007, reflecting the repeal of Glass-Steagel, the top ten NMA advisers in order were:
1. Goldman Sachs
2. Morgan Stanley
3. Citigroup
4. JP Morgan Chase
5. Lehman Brothers
6. Merrill Lynch
7. UBS Warburg
8. Credit Suisse
9. Deutsche Bank
10. Lazard
In the IPO stock underwriting field for 1991 the top four were Goldman Sachs, Merrill Lynch,
Morgan Stanley and CS First Boston.
In the arena of global privatization for years 1985-1995,

Goldman Sachs led the way doing $13.3 billion worth of deals
UBS Warburg did $8.2 billion
BNP Paribas $6.8 billion

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and


CS First Boston $4.9 billion

Paribas-owner Merrill Lynch $4.4 billion

In 2006 BNP Paribas bought the notorious Banca Nacionale de Lavoro (BNL), which led the
charge in arming Saddam Hussein. According to Global Finance, it is now the worlds largest
bank with nearly $3 trillion in assets.
The leading US debt underwriters for the first nine months of 1995 bore the same familiar
names. Merrill Lynch underwrote $74.2 billion in the US debt markets, or 15.3% of the total.
Lehman Brothers handled $52.5 billion, Morgan Stanley $47.4 billion, Salomon Smith Barney
$45.6 billion. CS First Boston, Chase Manhattan and Goldman Sachs rounded out the top seven.
The top three municipal debt underwriters that year were,
Goldman Sachs
Merrill Lynch
UBS Paine Webber
In the euro-market the top four underwriters in 1995 were,
UBS Warburg
Merrill Lynch
Deutsche Bank
Goldman Sachs
Deutsche Banks Morgan Grenfell branch engineered the corporate takeover binge in Europe.
The dominant players in the oil futures markets at both the New York Mercantile Exchange and
the London Petroleum Exchange are Morgan Stanley Dean Witter, Goldman Sachs (through its
J. Aron & Company subsidiary), Citigroup (through its Philbro unit) and Deutsche Bank
(through its Bankers Trust acquisition).
In 2002 Enron Online was auctioned off by a bankruptcy court to UBS Warburg for $0. UBS
was to share monopoly Enron Online profits with Lehman Brothers after the first two years of
the deal. [19] With Lehmans 2008 demise, its new owner Barclays will get their cut.
Following the Lehman Brothers fiasco and the ensuing financial meltdown of 2008, the Four
Horsemen of Banking got even bigger.
For pennies on the dollar,
JP Morgan Chase was handed Bear Stearns and Washington Mutual
Bank of America commandeered Merrill Lynch and Countrywide
Wells Fargo seized control over the reeling #5 US bank Wachovia
Barclays got a sweetheart deal for the remains of Lehman Brothers


White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

Former House Banking Committee Chairman Wright Patman (D-TX), declared of Federal
Reserve Eight Families owners,
The United States today has in effect two governments. We are the duly
constituted government. Then we have an independent, uncontrolled and
uncoordinated government in the Federal Reserve System, operating the money
powers which are reserved to Congress by the Constitution.
Since the creation of the Federal Reserve, US debt (mostly owed to the Eight Families) has
skyrocketed from $1 billion to nearly $14 trillion today.
This far surpasses the total of all Third World country debt combined, debt which is mostly
owed to these same Eight Families, who own most all the worlds central banks.
Former House Banking Committee Chairman Texas Democrat Wright Patman in 1967 declared
of Federal Reserve Eight Families owners:
The United States today has in effect two governments. We are the duly constituted
government. Then we have an independent, uncontrolled and uncoordinated government
in the Federal Reserve System, operating the money powers which are reserved to
Congress by the Constitution.
International bankers make money by extending credit to governments. The greater the
debt of the political state, the larger the interest returned to lenders. The national banks
of Europe are (also) owned and controlled by private interests. We recognize in a hazy
sort of way that the Rothschilds and the Warburgs of Europe and the houses of JP
Morgan, Kuhn Loeb & Co., Schiff, Lehman and Rockefeller possess and control vast
wealth. How they acquire this vast financial power and employ it is a mystery to most of
us. - Senator Barry M. Goldwater
These banks are where you will find the Families that Rule the World. These families control
secret societies such as the Bilderberg Group, Council on Foreign Relations, Skull and Bones, the
Trilateral Commission as well as the institutions formed over the last 80 years or so, that control
global policy and monetary wealth using the United Nations, NATO, the World Bank, Bank of
International Settlements, and the International Monetary Fund.
If you look at the major investment companies, who has major shares in them, maybe that might
help present a different picture.
Blackrock, Vanguard, and State Street for example:
Davis Selected Advisers
Dodge & Cox
Vanguard Group, Inc.
State Street Corp
Southeastern Asset Management Inc.


White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

BlackRock Fund Advisors
Arnhold & S.
Bleichroeder Advisers, LLC
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
Fiduciary Management Inc. of Milwaukee
Longview Partners (Guernsey) Ltd.
Magellan Asset Management Limited
Artisan Partners Limited Partnership
Northern Trust Investments, N.A.
Invesco Advisers, Inc


T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc.
Vanguard Group, Inc.
Heartland Advisors, Inc.
BlackRock Fund Advisors
Artisan Partners Limited Partnership
Century Capital Management, LLC
Opus Capital Group LLC
Wellington Management Company, LLP
State Street Corp
Wells Capital Management Inc.



State Street
T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc.
State Street Corp
Vanguard Group, Inc.
BlackRock Fund Advisors
Mewhinney & Strauss LLC.
Invesco Advisers, Inc.
TIAA-CREF Investment Management LLC
Northern Trust Investments, N.A.
Public Sector Pension Investment Board
J.P. Morgan Investment Management Inc.
Fidelity Management and Research Company
GE Asset Management Inc.


Every single bank has the same investment companies and every single investment company is
partially owned by some of the other major investment companies. Its beyond the scope of this
book but if you were to sit down and look at the fortune 500, each of these investment companies,
are the top investors in every corporation. For example if you drill down into State Street,
BlackRock or Vanguard, each one has stock in each other. They are ALL like this. The entire
fortune 500, oil companies, and banks are so intertwined that its easy to see they are essentially
This has been accomplished through fractional reserve banking and the illegal drug and sex
trafficking that goes on globally. And by WAR! They are able to generate trillions and invest those

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

dollars into bank and corporate ownership. And of course they can hide most of this with owning
and controlling banks and shell companies in tax havens like the Cayman Islands, Liechtenstein,
Monaco, and Ireland and so on. U.S. financial companies to include JP Morgan, Wells Fargo, Bank
of America, Citigroup, Goldman Sachs, U.S. Bancorp, Bank of New York Mellon and Morgan
Stanley are controlled by very few shareholders of which we have the same four companies always
present, BlackRock, State Street, Vanguard and Fidelity.
These companies control the U.S. and global monetary policy without any democratic choice
or accountability. These companies and its shareholders created the current worldwide economic
crisis in which their wealth has significantly grown while creating global misery.
These are some of the companies controlled by this big four group and between owning the
major banks and corporations, are largely why so many corporations outsourced a majority of their
workforce. Alcoa Inc., Altria Group Inc., American International Group Inc., AT&T Inc., Boeing
Co., Caterpillar Inc., Coca-Cola Co., DuPont & Co., Exxon Mobil Corp., General Electric Co.,
General Motors Corporation, Hewlett-Packard Co., Home Depot Inc., Honeywell International
Inc., Intel Corp., International Business Machines Corp, Johnson & Johnson, JP Morgan Chase &
Co., McDonalds Corp., Merck & Co. Inc., Microsoft Corp., Pfizer Inc., Procter & Gamble Co.,
United Technologies Corp., Verizon Communications Inc., Wal-Mart Stores Inc., Time Warner,
Walt Disney, Viacom, News Corp., CBS Corporation and NBC Universal.
If you can get the identity of the major shareholders in BlackRock, State Street, Vanguard and
Fidelity that would help end global slavery! Chances are, its the 25 people I identified plus some
other people who may very well be completely out of the limelight.

Controlling the Media

Killing can be made simply by knowing the next few months newspapers
ahead of time." - Federal Reserve Chairman Burns
Rockefeller is a controlling member of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) and if you look at
the members, nearly every major newscaster in Fox News, MSNBC, and CNN are part of the CFR.
The CFR through its members controls a majority of the Media.
''The end goal is to get everybody chipped, to control the whole society, to have the
bankers and the elite people control the world '' - Nick Rockefeller
"We are grateful to The Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and
other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their
promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to
develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity
during those years. But, the work is now much more sophisticated and prepared to march
towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and
world bankers is surely preferable to the national autodetermination practiced in past
centuries." - David Rockefeller
The CFR has numerous members who are major shareholders in corporations as well as Federal
Reserve shareholders and carry great influence over the Media. Many of the major newscasters
you see are members of the CFR as well. It is also why smaller not so mainstream Media outlets

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

are attacked, suppressed, or labeled right wing or a gun toting white Tea Party racist. It is also why
Diane Feinstein is now attacking non-mainstream Media outlets and one of many reasons why the
U.S. gave the UN control of the Internet. Control! Control the truth! Control what people hear!
And with the United Nations assuming control of the Internet, many problems likely will result for
the non-Mainstream Media which will clearly violate the Constitution of the United States
Freedom of the Press and Freedoms of Speech and Expression but will somehow be cast aside
as our government will defer to the UN Charter and displace any responsibility. The United
Nations Charter is NOT above the US Constitution unless its allowed to be by the people!
Feinstein and Congress (Bill 558) Outlawing Alternative Media
Bill to protect journalists clears Senate panel
Journalists and bloggers who report news to the public will be protected from being forced
to testify about their work under a media shield bill passed by a Senate committee
But the new legal protections will not extend to the controversial online website
Wikileaks and others whose principal work involves disclosing "primary-source
documents without authorization."
Senate sponsors of the bill and a coalition of media groups that support it hailed
Thursday's bipartisan Senate Judiciary Committee vote as a breakthrough.
"We're closer than we've ever been before to passing a strong and tough media shield
bill," Sen. Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.) said. "Thanks to important bipartisan
compromises, we've put together a strong bill that balances the need for national security
with that of a free press."
Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) insisted on limiting the legal protection to "real
reporters" and not, she said, a 17-year-old with his own website.
"I can't support it if everyone who has a blog has a special privilege or if Edward
Snowden were to sit down and write this stuff, he would have a privilege. I'm not going
to go there," she said.
Feinstein introduced an amendment that defines a "covered journalist" as someone who
gathers and reports news for "an entity or service that disseminates news and
information." The definition includes freelancers, part-timers and student journalists, and
it permits a judge to go further and extend the protections to any "legitimate newsgathering activities."
But the bill also makes it clear that the legal protection is not absolute. Federal officials
still may "compel disclosure" from a journalist who has information that could stop or
prevent crimes such as murder, kidnapping or child abduction or prevent "acts of
terrorism" or significant harm to national security.
The Senate Judiciary Committee approved the bill on a 13-5 vote and sent it to the Senate
floor. Its sponsors are optimistic it will win passage there, but its fate remains in doubt in
the Republican-controlled House of Representatives.
Many publications and documents are tied to the bankers and reflect how they instigated, false
financed, and false flagged World War I, World War II, Vietnam, Korea, Kosovo, the Russian
Revolutionary War and countless other wars which helped the likes of Napoleon, Lenin, and Hitler
come to power and how they financed both sides and profited greatly.

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

Very easy for them to leak rumors and instigate invasions and wars. Even today with Iraq,
Afghanistan, Libya, Iran and Syria they promote war using the Media.
I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing
armies.- Thomas Jefferson
The Federal Reserve officials own more than 100 million dollars of stocks while making
decisions influencing these stock prices. History proves that banks profit from
bankrupting a nation." - Congressman Patman
Presidents Abraham Lincoln, Andrew Jackson, and John F. Kennedy tried to stop the bankers by
removing the central banks powers. John F. Kennedy began printing silver certificates and issuing
them as money to put the Federal Reserve out of business. Two of the three (Lincoln and Kennedy)
were assassinated and Andrew Jackson survived an assassination attempt.
How I Learned to Love the New World Order Wall Street Journal article by then
Senator Joe Biden, April 1992
Andrew Jackson was successful in removing the central banks by denying future charters once
they ran out. And that is one main reason why there is a push to remove Andrew Jackson from
the $20 bill. Absolutely nothing to do with race or gender. Part of the program associated with
White privilege.
Removing American History and Nationalism!
Andrew Jackson failed to pursue and identify everyone involved and hold them accountable.
Isnt a bit of a coincidence that ISIS is removing history and attacking Christians and nonviolent Muslims through intimidation and warfare while the United States government is doing
the same thing in the USA with a pen? If you think the gay rights movement or Confederate Flag
thing has anything to do with racism or gay rights your eyes are not open.
The affirmative task before us is to create a New World Order. VP Joe Biden,
On July 1, 1914 (a few months after the Federal Reserve was created) the U.S. national debt was
$2,900,000,000 ($2.9 billion) dollars. Today, it is more than more than 6,000 times larger.

Historical Debt and Interest Paid


National Deficit

Interest paid



$318,476,679,786 (Through June 2015)


White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and




This does not account for the trillions earned on interest on car loans, bank loans, home loans,
student loans, and credit cards. When you take those into account is likely that the average middle
class family pay anywhere from $100,000 to $1,000,000 in interest and taxes over the course of
their lives. And that is exactly how the system is designed to work.
You see why they market so heavily, they know even if people dont have the money, in fact
they count on it, that they will put it on credit card. They know consumers are addicted to buying
that next version of a tablet, cell phone, or video game. Put it on plastic, its only $10/month of
which you are essentially paying 15-29.99 percent more for product than the original price.
Since 1988 alone, the taxpayer has paid $9,745,827,792,634 ($9.7 trillion) in interest of which
90 percent of that money never existed. If we calculated what the U.S. taxpayer has paid since the
Federal Reserve came into existence in 1913, the interest paid could likely exceed 20 trillion.
Factor in interest on home loans, student loans, auto loans, and credit cards, you are looking at
100s of trillions.
Where exactly has all this money gone? How is it possible that EVERY country on the planet
has a deficit? Every country combined, just national deficit alone are in debt $78,292,468,516,097.
That is $78.3 trillion dollars. At 3% interest, that is $2,348,774,055,483 or $2.3 trillion in interest
a month alone. Where is that interest going and to whom? A good place to start would be with the
.001 percent. If they are cumulatively worth over $300,000,000,000,000 or $300 trillion and
counting, its pretty obvious where the money is going. Theres your redistribution liberals!


White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

The Fed's $16 Trillion Bailouts Under-Reported
The medias inscrutable brush-off of the Government Accounting Offices recently
released audit of the Federal Reserve has raised many questions about the Feds goingson since the financial crisis began in 2008.
The audit of the Feds emergency lending programs was scarcely reported by mainstream
media albeit the results are undoubtedly newsworthy. It is the first audit of the Fed in
United States history since its beginnings in 1913. The findings verify that over $16
trillion was allocated to corporations and banks internationally, purportedly for financial
assistance during and after the 2008 fiscal crisis.
Bernanke's Obfuscation Continues: The Fed's $29 Trillion Bail-Out Of Wall Street
Since the global financial crisis began in 2007, Chairman Bernanke has striven to save
Wall Street's biggest banks while concealing his actions from Congress by a thick veil of
secrecy. It literally took an act of Congress plus a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit by
Bloomberg to get him to finally release much of the information surrounding the Fed's
actions. Since that release, there have been several reports that tallied up the Fed's largess.
Most recently, Bloomberg provided an in-depth analysis of Fed lending to the biggest
banks, reporting a sum of $7.77 trillion. On December 8, Bernanke struck back with a
highly misleading and factually incorrect memo countering Bloomberg's report.
And that is precisely what Nicola Matthews and James Felkerson have done. They are
PhD students at the University of Missouri-Kansas City, working on a Ford Foundation
grant under my direction, titled "A Research And Policy Dialogue Project On Improving
Governance Of The Government Safety Net In Financial Crisis." To my knowledge it is
the most complete and accurate accounting of the Fed's bail-out. Their results will be
reported in a series of Working Papers at the Levy Economics Institute (www.levy.org).
The first one is titled "$29,000,000,000: A Detailed Look at the Fed's Bail-out by Funding
Facility and Recipient."
Here's the shocker. The Fed's bail-out was not $1.2 trillion, $7.77 trillion, $16 trillion, or
even $24 trillion. It was $29 trillion. That is, of course, the cumulative total. But even the
peak outstanding numbers are bigger than previously reported. I do not want to take any
of their fire away -- interested readers must read the full account. However, I will use
their study as the source for a brief summary of total Fed commitments.
Federal Reserve Bank admits they lost 9 Trillion Dollars
The Federal Reserve made $9 trillion in overnight loans to major banks and Wall Street
firms during the financial crisis, according to newly revealed data released Wednesday.
The loans were made through a special loan program set up by the Fed in the wake of the
Bear Stearns collapse in March 2008 to keep the nation's bond markets trading normally.
The amount of cash being pumped out to the financial giants was not previously
disclosed. All the loans were backed by collateral and all were paid back with a very low
interest rate to the Fed -- an annual rate of between 0.5% to 3.5%.

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

1 day before 9/11 2.3 Trillion $ Missing from DOD
September 10th 2001 Secretary of Defense of the USA declared war on the Pentagon
bureaucracy over an alleged $2.3 trillion in unaccounted for funds on expenses, the next
day 9/11 happened and the previous days headlines were over-shadowed by the start of
the Bush administrations modern-day crusade the War on Terror supported by the
mythical Coalition of the Willing in search of Weapons of Mass Destruction and
Taliban fighters the $2.3 trillion was later quietly found to have just been a computer
error Investigate 9/11
Anthony Antonello asks Donald Rumsfeld if he ever found that missing $2.3 Trillion

Quantitative Easing
In 2008 the Federal Reserve started stockpiling Treasuries, mortgage-backed securities and agency
debt in a program known as quantitative easing. Quantitative easing is another scam by the
bankers. It is essentially a program aimed at purchasing around $85 billion a month in Treasury
bonds and sold to the public that it will stimulate the economy and bring back millions of jobs
that have been outsourced to countries like China.
Former Wall Street employee, Andrew Huszar claims that U.S. banks, since Quantitative
Easing has been implemented, have seen their stock prices triple. He estimates that .2 percent of
these banks control 70% of all banking assets.
Lawrence Hunter of Forbes, economics and politics contributor explains how the
Federal Reserve and Quantitative Easing is horrible for the United States.
The Federal Reserve operates its own financial Laundromat for troubled, in some cases
criminal banks. The Feds loan laundry and downscale resale consignment shop first
takes in the wash by purchasing non-performing, and therefore largely worthless financial
assets (loans and loan-backed securities) to remove them from the books of private banks.
(Another variant is for the Fed to swap the banks bad paper at face value for federal debt
instruments, which replaces the banks non-performing assets having little, if any, resale
value, with safe, interest-paying and highly marketable assets.). The Fed then launders
the loans by reselling them back to the same group of banks at a fraction (10 percent or
less) of the face-value price it paid the banks for them. Once the banks repurchase the
spiffed up dirty loan laundry, it not only has turned a nifty 90-percent-or-more profit on
the turn around, it also has a new asset it can put back into the stream of financial
commerce at a price reflective of its true value.
The Fed is a perfect vehicle to transform bad assets into good. It is weakly overseen
without an independent audit and thus is able to intermediate the transformation of bad,
illiquid assets into money (and near money) and then back again into valuable financial
assets, all done secretly and anonymously. Unlike the polite, dont-ask-dont-tell fiction
of private hedge-fund money laundering, however, the Fed says outright, Dont ask,
because we arent telling, even when asked again and again.

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

Immediately after the 2008 financial meltdown, the Fed laundered more than $2 trillion
in worthless assets held on the balance sheets of private banks. According to a watereddown 2011 audit of the Fed by the Government Accountability Office (GAO), there have
been $16 trillion in Fed bailouts to banks and corporations around the world since the
financial meltdown in 2008. Since that report, Bloomberg has reported on an additional
$9 trillion in secret, off-balance-sheet Fed transactions that the central bank refuses to
discuss. Now, Ben Bernanke is ginning up assembly-line washing machines at the Fed
with QE to spin an opened-ended, $40-billion-monthly cleansing campaign to purchase
worthless mortgage backed securities from banks at face value, which could run to an
additional $1.3 trillion loan laundering accompanied by downscale resales.
Fed Profit of $88.9 Billion Sent to Treasury in 2012
The Federal Reserve said it sent $88.9 billion in profit to the Treasury Department in
2012, a record that reflected the vast expansion of the central banks investment portfolio.
As part of its campaign to stimulate the economy, the Federal Reserve over the last five
years has amassed $2.7 trillion in Treasury securities and mortgage-backed securities and
agency debt in programs known as quantitative easing. And the central bank is still
expanding its holdings by $85 billion a month.
The interest payments on those securities are the primary source of the Federal Reserves
profits. The Fed has transferred a total of $335 billion to the Treasury since 2009,
compared with $147 billion in the previous five years, adjusted for inflation. The Fed has
transferred at least some profit to the Treasury every year since 1934.
Without ever using the word "money," a practice common among inspectors general
(IGs), the deputy IG at the Pentagon read an eight-page summary of DOD fiduciary
failures. He admitted that $4.4 trillion in adjustments to the Pentagon's books had to be
cooked to compile the required financial statements and that $1.1 trillion of that amount
could not be supported by reliable information. In other words, at the end of the last full
year on Bill Clinton's watch, more than $1 trillion was simply gone and no one can be
sure of when, where or to whom the money went.
In January 2013, Rep. Alan Grayson asked the Federal Reserve Inspector General Elizabeth
Coleman about the trillions of dollars lent or spent by the Federal Reserve and where it went, and
the trillions of off balance sheet obligations from September 2012. Elizabeth Coleman responded
that she does not know and is not tracking where this money is.
Grayson: So who got the money?
Bernanke: Financial institutions in Europe and other countries.
Grayson: Which ones?
Bernanke: I dont know.
Grayson: Half a trillion dollars and you dont know who got the money?
The amount of money that was identified in a partial audit that is missing or is unaccounted for
is $9,000,000,000,000 ($9 trillion) dollars and some people estimate a full audit would triple or
even quadruple that number. See why there will never be a full audit? Partial audit, what came of
it? NOTHING! No one in trouble!
What people should be asking is; why doesnt Congress audit the Federal Reserve?

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

Why does CONGRESS always vote NAY or NO to a full audit?
And where is all that money? Who has it?
You know why no one is asking? Because 75% of the braindead Americans are focused on the
Confederate Flag, gay marriage, and White privilege! They are focused on basketball, football,
Jay-Z, Beyonc, Katy Perry, and Hollywood celebrities! NO CLUE what is going on in the real
This audit passed the House in July 2012, 327-98. NO votes below!
Federal Reserve Transparency Act of 2012 (H.R. 459)

Matsui, Doris
Woolsey, Lynn
Miller, George
Thompson, Bennie
Garamendi, John
Stark, Pete
Cardoza, Dennis
Capps, Lois
Waxman, Henry
Becerra, Xavier
Chu, Judy
Bass, Karen
Roybal-Allard, Lucille (D)
Napolitano, Grace
Snchez, Linda
Davis, Susan
DeGette, Diana
Maloney, Carol
Larson, John
DeLauro, Rosa
Himes, James
Lowey, Nita
Carney, John
Castor, Kathy
Wilson, Frederica
Deutch, Theodore
Wasserman Schultz, D (D)
Hastings, Alcee
Johnson, Hank
Lewis, John
Stivers, Steve
Hanabusa, Colleen
Hirono, Mazie
Rush, Bobby
Jackson, Jesse
Davis, Danny

McCollum, Betty
Ellison, Keith
Pelosi, Nancy
Lee, Barbara
Cleaver, Emanuel
Eshoo, Anna
Pallone, Frank
Rothman, Steven
Holt, Rush
Sires, Albio
Slaughter, Louise
Israel, Steve
Ackerman, Gary
Meeks, Gregory
Crowley, Joseph
Turner, Robert
Velzquez, Nydia
Towns, Ed
Rangel, Charles
Serrano, Jos
Engel, Eliot
Brown, Corrine
Hinchey, Maurice
Butterfield, G.K.
Price, David
Shuler, Heath
Watt, Mel
Miller, Brad
Kaptur, Marcy
Fudge, Marcia
Brady, Robert
Ryan, Tim
Bonamici, Suzanne
Blumenauer, Earl
Gutirrez, Luis
Fattah, Chaka

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and


Schakowsky, Jan
Carson, Andr
Richmond, Cedric
Sarbanes, John
Edwards, Donna
Hoyer, Steny
Cummings, Elijah
Van Hollen, Chris
Olver, John
Neal, Richard
Frank, Barney
Capuano, Michael
Keating, William
Peters, Gary
Conyers, John
Andrews, Rob 21


Schwartz, Allyson
Clyburn, Jim
Cooper, Jim
Reyes, Silvestre
Jackson Lee, Sheila
Gonzalez, Charles
Johnson, Eddie
Larsen, Rick
Dicks, Norm
McDermott, Jim
Markey, Ed
Moore, Gwen
Kind, Ron
Levin, Sander
Dingell, John

Ron Pauls request to Audit the Fed with HR 1207, (111th): Federal Reserve Transparency Act of
2009 failed 229-198, a lot of the names are duplicates. People like Hank Johnson, Sheila Jackson
Lee, Denise Wasserman Schultz, Maxine Waters, Jesse Jackson Jr., Henry Waxman, Barbara Lee,
and Barney Frank are some of the more common names.
According to the results of the limited Fed audit under H.R. 459 a total of $16,100,000,000,000
($16.1 trillion) dollars in secret loans were made by the Federal Reserve between December 1,
2007 and July 21, 2010. A copy of the audit can be found here:
Morgan Stanley
Merrill Lynch
Bank of America
Barclays PLC
Bear Sterns
Goldman Sachs
Royal Bank of Scotland
JP Morgan Chase
Deutsche Bank
Credit Suisse
Lehman Brothers
Bank of Scotland
BNP Paribas
Wells Fargo
Dresdner Bank

Loan Amount
$2.513 trillion
$2.041 trillion
$1.949 trillion
$1.344 trillion
$868 billion
$853 billion
$814 billion
$541 billion
$391 billion
$354 billion
$287 billion
$262 billion
$183 billion
$181 billion
$175 billion
$159 billion
$159 billion
$142 billion
$135 billion

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

Societe Generale

$124 billion

"All Other Borrowers"

$2.639 trillion

The greatest period of economic growth in U.S. history was between the Civil War and 1913. In
fact the value of the U.S. dollar has fallen by 83 percent since 1970 alone with the inflation rate
going up 500.4%. The value of the dollar alone since 2000 has dropped nearly 40%. This decline
happens to coincide with the timing of the Petrodollar which is essentially when the gold backed
currency was publicly removed by Democrat President Richard Nixon.
Since the Federal Reserve came into existence in 1913, inflation has gone up 2253% and the
dollars value has dropped 98%. The federal government has changed the way it calculates
inflation more than 20 times since 1978. They change how they calculate inflation,
unemployment, and the social classes constantly so the American people dont see what is going
on and then use the Media to lie to the people about it.

Start of the Petrodollar System

It is formulated that around 1972, the Petrodollar system was formed. The Petrodollar is a system
in which gold was removed from the equation and the U.S. dollar entered. In 1972, Henry
Kissinger who was Secretary of State under Nixon made a trip to Saudi Arabia in which he sealed
a deal with the House of Saud. The deal that resulted was that Saudi Arabia would publicly and
formally sell oil in U.S. dollars only.
In exchange for the Petrodollar, the promise was that the U.S. would provide protection and
sell the Saudis military arms. Part of the agreement was that Saudi Arabia would convince the
other OPEC countries to follow suit and also trade oil using only the US dollar.
Another part of the agreement was to keep the Saud Family in power where their wealth grew.
It is another reason why the Saudis keep quiet about Israel and publicly do not defend countries
that have something to say about Israel nor go against the UN or the USA in matters of Iraq, Iran
or Syria. If you want to put it in a different term, Saudi Arabia sold out the other Arab nations in
return for wealth and protection.
Petrodollar Warfare: Oil, Iraq and the Future of the Dollar
The invasion of Iraq may well be remembered as the first oil currency war.
Far from being a response to 9-11 terrorism or Iraq's alleged weapons of
mass destruction, Petrodollar Warfare argues that the invasion was
precipitated by two converging phenomena: the imminent peak in global
oil production, and the ascendance of the euro currency.
Energy analysts agree that world oil supplies are about to peak, after which
there will be a steady decline in supplies of oil. Iraq, possessing the world's
second largest oil reserves, was therefore already a target of U.S. geo-strategic interests.
Together with the fact that Iraq had switched its oil export currency to euros -- rather than
U.S. dollars -- the Bush administration's unreported aim was to prevent further OPEC
momentum in favor of the euro as an alternative oil transaction currency standard.
Meticulously researched, Petrodollar Warfare examines U.S. dollar hegemony and the
unsustainable macroeconomics of 'petrodollar recycling,' pointing out that the issues
underlying the Iraq war also apply to geopolitical tensions between the U.S. and other

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

countries including the European Union (E.U.), Iran, Venezuela, and Russia. The author
warns that without changing course, the American Experiment will end the way all
empires end with military over-extension and subsequent economic decline. He
recommends the multilateral pursuit of both energy and monetary reforms within a United
Nations framework to create a more balanced global energy and monetary system thereby
reducing the possibility of future oil-depletion and oil currency-related warfare. Book
by William R. Clark
Federal Reserve Refuses to Submit to an Audit of Germanys Gold Held in U.S.
The German government has been storing about half of its gold supply with the US FED,
apparently in the NYC FED vaults. Germany decided to bring home all its gold, but the
FED has said that isnt possible to do, and it would need until 2020 to be able to
accomplish the transfer.
Saudi Arabia pushed the power they held regionally over its member nations of OPEC to trade oil
with the U.S. dollar. What this meant for the rest of the world was, if they wanted oil from OPEC
nations they had to first convert their currency to American dollars before they purchased any oil.
This meant that the U.S. dollar would now control a vast amount of the worlds oil purchases.
The result of the petrodollar system was that money would go into the Federal Reserve System
which helped disguise the spending problem the country had and hid the devaluing of the dollar
because of debt. It also allowed the banking system to lend more money out using the fractional
reserve system. In 2000, Saddam Hussein thought they should have the right to trade oil without
having to convert to the U.S. dollar. He felt that Iraq should be able to control its own oil and the
price of oil. Saddam Hussein began converting the Petrodollar to the Euro. By 2002 Iraq had
converted to the Euro thus dumping the U.S. Petrodollar. That year, Iraq sold over 3 billion barrels
of oil in which the United States bought 2 billion. But the U.S. had to convert the USD to Euros
so the Federal Reserve could not just print the money to pay for oil. Bob Woodward of the
Washington Post interviewed Alan Greenspan and in the interview, Alan Greenspan elaborated on
a comment in his book by saying Removing Saddam from power was essential to keep the
existing system in place.
Existing system would be the Petrodollar system! The claim we went for oil and perhaps its
turned into that but we went to ensure the petrodollar system remained intact which still means
it was oil related. March 19, 2003, a full scale invasion of Iraq was announced by George W.
Bush. One point I want to make, and I am not letting the Republicans off and I can guarantee this
was all preplanned, was that both the UN (Hans Blix) and Bill Clinton failed to adhere to the
agreement which Iraq signed in 1991 as part of its condition of surrender. That was to allow UN
and US weapons inspectors into Iraq whenever the UN or USA deemed it wanted to inspect the
country. That included any location it chose! During the Clinton administration the only
inspections that took place were where Hussein said they could go. So of course, this warranted
the WMD card by the Bush Administration. I cant stress enough that this was preplanned and
that Bush and Clinton both serve the same master!


White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

And those who dont learn from history are constantly fooled. Look at the agreement the UN and
USA just signed with Iran. No USA inspectors are allowed, we removed sanctions, and then gave
them some $85 billion dollars. Part of that treaty is no nuclear weapons for 10 years. So what
happens when the .001 percent controlled Media tell you that Iran is breaking the conditions of the
agreement, even if they arent? Time to invade Iran! And somehow Syria and Israel be dragged
into this. You could even see a false flag strike on Syria or Israel and the blame will be placed on
Iran. This is about control and nothing else!
Gold, Oil, Africa and Why the West Wants Gadhafi Dead
Gadhafi's creation of the African Investment Bank in Sirte (Libya) and the African
Monetary Fund to be based in Cameroon will supplant the IMF and undermine Western
economic hegemony in Africa, said Gerald Pereira, an executive board member of the
former Tripoli-based World Mathaba.
The moves are also bad for France because when the African Monetary Fund and the
African Central Bank in Nigeria starts printing gold-backed currency, it would ring the
death knell" for the CFA franc through which Paris was able to maintain its neocolonial
grip on 14 former African colonies for the last 50 years.
It is easy to understand the French wrath against Gaddafi, said Prof. Jean-Paul Pougala
of the Geneva School of Diplomacy.
Saving the world economy from Gaddafi
Some believe it is about protecting civilians, others say it is about oil, but some are
convinced intervention in Libya is all about Gaddafis plan to introduce the gold dinar, a
single African currency made from gold, a true sharing of the wealth.
Its one of these things that you have to plan almost in secret, because as soon as you
say youre going to change over from the dollar to something else, youre going to be
targeted, says Ministry of Peace founder Dr. James Thring. There were two conferences
on this, in 1986 and 2000, organized by Gaddafi. Everybody was interested, most
countries in Africa were keen.
A countrys wealth would depend on how much gold it had and not how many dollars it
traded. And Libya has 144 tons of gold. The UK, for example, has twice as much, but ten
times the population.
If Gaddafi had an intent to try to re-price his oil or whatever else the country was selling
on the global market and accept something else as a currency or maybe launch a gold
dinar currency, any move such as that would certainly not be welcomed by the power
elite today, who are responsible for controlling the worlds central banks, says Anthony
Wile, founder and chief editor of the Daily Bell.
So yes, that would certainly be something that would cause his immediate dismissal and
the need for other reasons to be brought forward from moving him from power.
And it has happened before.
In 2000, Saddam Hussein announced Iraqi oil would be traded in euros, not dollars. Some
say sanctions and an invasion followed because the Americans were desperate to prevent
OPEC from transferring oil trading in all its member countries to the euro.


White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

Syria and Iran are challenging U.S. Currency with a new oil trade system! Iran is doing the same
thing Iraq and Libya tried to do. They are trying to get out from the stranglehold of the Central
Banks and the nothing backed U.S dollar as a standard of trade, the Petrodollar.
Tehran Pushes to Ditch the US Dollar
Iran is no longer using the US dollar in foreign-trade transactions and is replacing it
with other currencies, the deputy governor at the Iranian Central Bank Gholami
Kamyab said, according to Sputnik News.
Iran presses ahead with dollar attack dumping the Petrodollar
Last week, the Tehran Times noted that the Iranian oil bourse will start trading oil in
currencies other than the dollar from March 20. This long-planned move is part of
President Mahmoud Ahmadinejads vision of economic war with the west.
Recall that Saddam [Hussein] announced Iraq would no longer accept dollars for oil
purchases in November 2000 and the US-Anglo invasion occurred in March 2003, the
Times continued. Similarly, Iran opened its oil bourse in 2008, so it is a credit to
Iranian negotiating ability that the 'crisis has not come to a head long before now.
Iran has the third-largest oil reserves in the world and pricing oil in currencies other
than dollars is a provocative move aimed at Washington. If Iran switches to the nondollar terms for its oil payments, there could be a new oil price that would be
denominated in euro, yen or even the yuan or rupee.
Petrodollar pumping US policy on Iran, backfire looms
A profound transformation of the global monetary system is underway. It is being driven
by a perfect storm: the need for Russia and Iran to escape Western sanctions, the low
interest rate policy of the U.S. Federal Reserve to keep the American economy afloat and
the increasing demand for Middle East oil by China.
The implications of this transformation are immense for U.S. policy in the Middle East
which, for 50 years, has been founded on a partnership with Saudi Arabia.
As economic sanctions are increasingly part of the West's arsenal, those non-Western
countries that are the target -- or potential target -- of such sanctions are devising a
counterpunch: non-dollar trading. It would, in effect, nullify the impact of sanctions.
Whether in yuan or roubles, non-dollar trading -- which enables countries to bypass U.S.
claims to legal jurisdiction -- will transform the prospects facing Iran and Syria,
particularly in the field of energy reserves, and deeply affect Iraq which is situated
between the two.
President Putin has said (in the context of reducing Russia's economic vulnerabilities)
that he views the dollar monopoly in energy trade as damaging to the Russian economy.

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

Since hydrocarbon revenues form the most substantive part of Russia's revenues, Putin's
desire to take action in this area is not surprising.
In the face of sanctions, Putin is seeking to reduce its economic dependence on the West.
Russia has signed two "holy grail" gas contracts with China and is in negotiations to offer
the latter sophisticated weaponry. It is also in the process of finalizing significant trade
deals with India and Iran. All of this will be to the benefit of Iran, too: the Russians
recently announced a deal to build several new nuclear power plants there.
The dollar's role as the world's reserve currency was first established in 1944 with the
Bretton Woods agreement. The U.S. was able assume this role by virtue of it then having
the largest gold reserves in the world. The dollar was pegged at $35 an ounce -- and freely
exchangeable into gold at that rate. But by 1971, convertibility into gold was no longer
viable as America's gold resources drained away. Instead, the dollar became a pure fiat
currency (decoupled from any physical store of value), until the petrodollar agreement
was concluded by President Nixon in 1973.
The essence of the deal was that the U.S. would agree to military sales and defense of
Saudi Arabia in return for all oil trade being denominated in U.S. dollars.
As a result of this agreement, the dollar then became the only medium in which energy
exchange could be transacted. This underpinned its reserve currency status through the
need for foreign governments to hold dollars; recirculated the dollar costs of oil back into
the U.S. financial system and -- crucially -- made the dollar effectively convertible into
barrels of oil. The dollar was moved from a gold standard onto a crude oil standard.
U.S. interest rates were then managed so that oil exporters (who formerly looked to gold
as the basis of their reserves) would be indifferent to whether they stored their currency
reserves, earned from oil exports, in U.S. treasuries, or in gold. The value was equivalent.
Petrodollar pumping US policy on Iran, backfire looms
As tensions between the US and Iran heat up, author Michael T. Winter believes the main
reason behind Americas harsh stance is Tehrans move to seek an alternative to the dollar
as an oil currency.
Economic sanctions, spearheaded by the US and, less willingly, the EU could have a
disastrous effect on both of their respective economies. If Iran cannot sell their oil to
Europe, there are plenty of customers waiting in the wings, and if they come bearing not
petrodollars, but gold and sovereign currencies, then all the better for Iran. These
sanctions, if enforced, will in effect place a serious dent in the power of the petrodollar.
Any rhetoric regarding Irans nuclear program and the insistence on crippling it is nothing
more than a US attempt to force regime change for one more receptive to maintaining the
hegemony of the petrodollar.
The world now knows the truth about the US and how they conduct their affairs. US
hostilities toward Iran have nothing to do with nuclear weapons development. If that

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

were the case, then North Korea and Pakistan would be facing similar sanctions and
threats, but they arent. The difference of course is in what lies beneath the ground oil.
Iran has it and the other guys dont.
At the heart of the issue is not Irans dubious attempt to build nuclear weapons, or even
oil, but how that oil is paid for. In 1973, Richard Nixon promised King Faisal of Saudi
Arabia that the US would protect Saudi Arabian oilfields from any and all interested
parties seeking to forcefully wrest them from the House of Saud. Its important to
remember that in 1973, Saudi Arabia didnt have a fraction of the military and ground
forces it possesses today (almost exclusively US manufactured weapons) and the USSR
was very much a threat.
In return Saudi Arabia, and by extension OPEC, agreed to sell their oil in US dollars only.
As if that werent sweet enough, as part of the deal, they were required to invest their
profits in US treasuries, bonds and bills. The real zinger is that all countries purchasing
oil from OPEC had to do so in US dollars, or petrodollars.
This strengthened the US dollar, resulting in a steady US economic growth cycle
throughout the 80s and 90s. Countries purchasing OPEC oil started buying US treasury
bills, bonds and securities to ensure they could continue purchasing OPEC oil. This
worked fine for the US until 2001.
No plan, however well formulated, functions smoothly indefinitely.
2001, enter Saddam Hussein. He floated a plan to sell oil for European currencies in lieu
of petrodollars. Shortly after Iraq was suddenly found to be seeking and stockpiling
weapons of mass destruction allegations spearheaded by the US. The world knows what
happened, suffice it to say that Saddam is dead and Iraq is back on track, selling its oil
for petrodollars once again.
Muammar Gaddafi harbored the Lockerbie Bombers and allowed various terrorist
organizations establish training camps in Libya. He tried to buy a nuke from China in
1972. In 1977, he approached Pakistan, then India. He sought nerve gas from Thailand.
In spite of well over fifty failed assassination attempts on Gaddafi by Israel, the US and
the UK, Libya was left to its own devices for the most part. Seeking nukes and harboring
terrorists is one thing, but threatening the petrodollar is quite another. Gaddafi made a
fatal error when he decided to move away from the petrodollar in favor of other
currencies. This simply was not tolerated by the US. Having already played the WMD
card in Iraq, something new was pulled from the US regime change grab bag. Within a
year, internal elements rose up in rebellion against Gaddafi and now he is dead. Long
live the petrodollar.
Dominique Strauss-Kahn, former head of the International Monetary Fund (IMF),
suggested last year that the Euro would be a more suitable oil reserve currency than the
US Dollar. Within three months of that statement, allegations of rape ruined his career,
derailing his bid for the French Presidency in the process. Soon thereafter, all charges

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

were dropped, but of course, le dommage tait fait the damage was done. Christine
Lagarde, DSKs replacement as head of the IMF sees no reason to change the current
arrangement, naturellement.
How about Syria? Magically they have chemical weapons. Millions dying around the world from
hunger, thousands being droned by the USA, but a few hundred so called victims of chemical
weapons means the USA should invade Syria? They are working on a false flag of some kind. No
matter what happens, question it! It very well might be a foreign attack, but chances are, its being
orchestrated by those who own and control the big oil, big bank, and big corporation stock.
The PetroDollar - Why Syria
Right now, the US Dollar makes up 2/3rds of the worlds global reserve currency. This is
because nearly every oil-exporting country in the world exclusively sells their oil in
dollars, so nations are forced to hoard large amounts of the dollar.
There are two countries that don't sell their oil in the dollar: Syria, and Iran.
If these two countries joined forces, got Venezuela on their side, maybe a few other
countries, and then made an economic treaty with the BRICS nations, an acronym for
Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa, to buy their oil in a currency other than
the US dollar, the economy would collapse
All countries in the world would send their massive hoards of the dollar back to the Fed
in exchange for whichever currency replaces it. The value of the dollar would shrink
dramatically and the Fed would be forced to take steps to shrink the money supply to
stem massive inflation. The raising of the Federal Funds rate would mean that there would
not be enough new loans created to pay off old loans (which is necessary, because there
is always more debt in the economy than there is money, because money is created with
interest attached, from the very beginning we are all indebted to a small cabal that sits
behind the federal reserve). The defaulting of loans would lead to a chain reaction that
would collapse the $700,000,000,000,000 derivatives market. In addition, the Fed
wouldn't be able to mindlessly pump money into the economy anymore such as with their
current policy of quantitative easing.
In 2001, Iraq began selling their oil in the Euro. We invaded.
In 2010 Gaddafi proposed a new currency called the Gold Dinar to replace the dollar for
oil sales. We bombed the shit out of his country and caused a regime change.
Syria moved away from the Dollar in 06 and Iran in 08. That is what this is all about.
There are other geopolitical objectives, sure, such as the pipeline that Syria signed with
Iran instead of the US friendly Qatar, but the Petrodollar is the king. It is literally the only
reason the dollar and US economy is stable. The entirety of the Western financial elite
need the Petrodollar system and they are willing to go to war and kill millions to defend
Some food for thought: how are they able to keep discussion about the petrodollar
completely out of the mainstream media and politics? Hundreds, maybe thousands of
people acting in concert to lie to the American people for another war. And they will do
the same for Iran.

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

The Petrodollar is essentially allowing the .001 percent to run the national deficit up by artificially
propping up the economy. Without the Petrodollar and fractional reserve banking, the dollar
would have already collapsed. The criminals who own the banks and corporations want to continue
to drain as much wealth out of the system as possible until THEY are ready to let it collapse. They
need the Petrodollar in place for as long as possible which Iran, Syria, trade with Russia and China
are threatening.
A MAJOR false flag is coming. Another war is needed so the bankers can get the U.S.
government to print more money in order to prop the system up a bit longer. In comes ISIS while
the USA has wide open borders!
President Andrew Jackson stated in reference to the bankers at the state of his
administration: You are a den of vipers and thieves. I intend to rout you out, and by the
Eternal God, I will rout you out.
"The New World Order will have to be built from the bottom up rather than from the top
down, but in the end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece will
accomplish much more than the old fashioned frontal assault." - Richard Gardner, CFR
member writing in the April l974 issue of the CFRs journal, Foreign Affairs.
I am sure youve seen the stats that the richest ONE percent own 50 percent of the worlds wealth.
A few thousand people own half of the worlds wealth. A few thousand people are worth 100s of
trillions of dollars!
In 2007 the richest 1% of the American population owned 34.6%. In 2014 the richest 1%
controlled 46 percent of the wealth and in 2015 that number is at 50% and by 2018 it is estimated
to reach $334 trillion. In the early 1970s the richest .001 percent only owned SEVEN percent of
the worlds wealth.
What happened?
Redistribution of wealth?
White privilege huh?
Globalization is what happened! Limits of Growth happened, Agenda 21 and Sustainable
Development are what happened! Manipulating the housing market laws are what happened.
Any idea who most of these people are? Most of these people who own 50 percent of the
worlds wealth are White Americans and White Europeans half of whom hide behind some form
of Christian identity with the rest hiding behind the Jewish identity who dont practice Judaism
but are really just White people whose ethnic heritage is Jewish. Most of the shareholders with
most of these investment firms are the very same people. The Waltons alone (Wal-Mart/Sams
Club), five people, own more than 40 percent of Americans COMBINED. That is five people
worth more than 120 million people. Its not White people; its a group of ultra-wealthy people
who for the most part happen to be White. Carlos Slim of Mexico is the 2nd richest man in the
world. Mexicans arent rich, Carlos is. Most Mexicans are dirt poor. Mike Adenuga of Nigeria is
worth billions, he is a multi-billionaire but Nigerians are not rich.
White people are not rich. Some White people are. The rest are pawns!


White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and


They Own the Media

Guess what else the major investment companies own?
The Media!
Are you starting to see a pattern yet?
What about Congress, what are they invested in? General Electric, Microsoft, Procter &
Gamble, Wells Fargo, Apple, IBM, AT&T, Verizon, JPMorgan Chase, and Exxon Mobil. If you
go look up the major owners in IBM, Microsoft, etc. you will see the same investment companies
as the major banks. Vanguard, JP Morgan, Wells Fargo, BlackRock, State Street all appear in the
top ownership category.
So why am I talking about banks, corporations, shareholders etc.? Its all part of the program,
all part of global agenda! In appearance, the White privilege movement is to make the Mainstream
Media, Corporate America, banks, and schools all look like they are righting a wrong. This
movement however, has absolutely nothing to do with so called writing any historic wrongs. And
any wrongs that did happen, are at the hands of the .001 percent because they have owned all of it
since the beginning. But who are being targeted? The White middle class male! Who have nothing
to do with any of it!
And keep in mind who promoted and profited from slavery, has controlled big business and
was responsible for hiring practices and still are today? Corporate America! And who owns them?

Why Promote White Privilege Then?

To understand why White privilege is being promoted by White people, one must first understand
the underlying factors. If you havent noticed, the war on poverty, the war on drugs, the war on
terror, or the civil rights movement have not even come close to yielding the results that were
advertised to the general public.
Drug incarceration has shot up 500 percent since the war on drugs was declared, drug use has
shot up, drug arrests have shot up, drug related crime to include shootings is far worse, terrorism
is a greater threat now than ever, poverty is far worse, unemployment is worse, and the overall
standard of living for 99 percent of Americans has drastically declined. All of these programs since
they were implemented have noticeably made things worse and impact a majority of Americans
lives. This is all to do with creating programs where banks and corporations could be legislated
into the process. And if you dont know by now, the biggest generators of spending is the military
industrial complex.
One of the myths out there is that minorities in general are the only ones on welfare and
typically have several kids. The reason I am showing this is it ties into several factors of the White
privilege movement. Take a look at the average household size for the last 100+ years. And then
look at the average household size by race for the last 100+ years.

Average Household Size



White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and



Household Size by Race








Change (2002 to 2013)

- .55
- .81
- .59
- .59

In 1900, about 1 out of 8 Americans was of a race other than White. By 2000, approximately 1
out of 4 Americans was non-White. By 2050 White Americans are projected to be a minority.








87.9% 89.7% 89.5% 87.5% 83.1% 83.1% 75.1% 62.6%
11.6% 9.9% 10.0% 11.1% 11.7% 12.1% 12.3% 13.2%
5.2% 7.7% 12.6% 17.1
White Hispanic
And there is some overlap. Some Hispanics are labeled white in the Census which the US Census
claims OVERALL White is 77.7%.
Why would family sizes and population growth decline? And remember this chart because
something called The Limits of Growth was introduced in the early 1970s which I will expand
on later but in short, its all to do with what you see today with the global elite and their push for
global warming legislation. The Limits of Growth introduced the mechanism to start
downsizing the global middle class. The .001, the small group of rulers who own most of the
worlds wealth determined that the middle class was a danger to the planet. That it is the biggest
consumer of natural resources and thus directly contribute to the polluting of the land, sea, and air.
Their claim is middle class families have the most kids and that in return is responsible for
overconsumption of natural resources.
However, if this were true, then why is it that India, Africa, and China who account for close
to 4 billion of the worlds population, in general, live in poverty? Very little middle class but look
at the population expansion in those countries. Then you take the Europe AND America who are
combined around 700 million? This is about not only curbing population growth but it is mostly
about controlling the wealth!
Outsourcing of jobs started in the 1960s just before the official report by the Club of Romes
Limits of Growth was published.


White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and


Industrial Revolution
The industrial revolution is responsible for a lot of what we see today, from modern transportation,
plumbing, heating and air conditioning, electricity to medicine. The industrial revolution began in
England in the mid 1700s and really took off in the USA after the Civil War and transformed the
world. It changed human life as it was known at the time.
The industrial revolution introduced textile manufacturing, iron, printing, engineering
industries, papermaking, the steam engine, mineral mining, energy technology and the growth of
factories. It increased agricultural productivity, industrial growth, and capital formation, all which
have one thing in common. It led to a drastic increase in population. This increase was not limited
to England, Europe, and the United States but happened around the world. In England, the
population doubled between 1680 and 1820. The world population from day 1 to the year 1,000
was around 300 million people. Just over 800 year later in 1804, it was one billion.
Over the course of 800 years, the population grew by 700 million. The mid 1700s sparked the
Industrial Revolution. Between 1804 and 1927, the population doubled to 2 billion people. To get
to 3 billion people it took 33 years, to 4 billion it took 14 years, to 5 billion took 13 years, and to
6 billion took 12 years. From 2000 to 2014 the population has grown another 1 billion. Estimates
put the human population at around 9 billion by 2050. But the population is being culled through
starvation, lack of access to water, GMO, cancer, abortion and so on. Else, the population would
be 15 billion by 2050, if you compare the growth achieved from the 1800s to the 1960s. The
population boom has slowed down drastically in the last 40+ years, even though technology is
accessible to more people.
Historically, a majority of the individuals in the middle class were White. One could look at
that negative or racial but then one needs to understand demographics and percentages and that
during the industrial revolution up until the 1960s, White people made up over 70 percent of the
population. So statistically 70% of the White population should fall within the middle class.
Nothing racial at all with those numbers! If you want to talk about privilege, racism, and
percentages, we could talk about the NBA and NFL couldnt we?
The middle class in 2015 however, is not the same middle class that existed 30, 40, or even 50
years ago. And this is one of many reasons for the White privilege movement.
The Middle Class in Decline
The net worth of middle class families, which includes assets such as a home or retirement
account, dropped 28 percent from $129,600 in 2001 to $93,200 in 2010.
In 2010 the upper class took in 46 percent of all income, up from 29 percent in 1970 while the
middle class took in 45 percent of income, down significantly from between 62 to 72 percent it
enjoyed in 1970. How's that for a transfer of wealth!
The American middle class has been shrinking since 1970. Princeton University
economist Alan Krueger said the American middle class shrank from 50.3 percent of
American households in 1970 to 42.2 percent in 2010. Krueger defined the middle class
as households with annual incomes within 50 percent of the national Median income.
Middle-class workers will take a bigger hit to their income proportionately than those
earning between $200,000 and $500,000 under the new fiscal cliff deal, according to the

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

nonpartisan Tax Policy Center. Earners in the latter group will pay an average 1.3 percent
more while workers making between $30,000 and $200,000 will see their paychecks
shrink by as much as 1.7 percent.
- Under George W. Bush, from 2000 to 2008, the poverty rate average was 12.3 percent compared
to 2009 to 2012 where its 15.1 percent under Barrack Obama. However, this increases with each
president and will continue too regardless of who is president.
- Between 2010 and 2012 on average, 46 million people lived in poverty and a record 47 million
people were on food stamps, up 47% under the Obama Administration.
Exclusive: 4 in 5 in US face near-poverty, no work
WASHINGTON (AP) Four out of 5 U.S. adults struggle with joblessness, near-poverty
or reliance on welfare for at least parts of their lives, a sign of deteriorating economic
security and an elusive American dream.
Survey data exclusive to The Associated Press points to an increasingly globalized U.S.
economy, the widening gap between rich and poor, and the loss of good-paying
manufacturing jobs as reasons for the trend.
The findings come as President Barack Obama tries to renew his administration's
emphasis on the economy, saying in recent speeches that his highest priority is to "rebuild
ladders of opportunity" and reverse income inequality.
Hardship is particularly growing among whites, based on several measures. Pessimism
among that racial group about their families' economic futures has climbed to the highest
point since at least 1987. In the most recent AP-GfK poll, 63 percent of whites called the
economy "poor."
One of the principles of the White privilege movement is that Whites just fell into a modest
lifestyle because they are White. Because their parents were White. And Noel seems to think the
White man has done nothing good for society. One thing to keep in mind is that the industrial
revolution was about inventions and innovation and that was mostly accomplished by White males.
Contrary to Noels racist opinion, he couldnt be farther from the truth.
And this is yet another reason why there is the movement. Continuous invention leads to
demand for consumption which obviously requires an increase in manufacturing and production.
The impact is that it would require more draining of natural resources for the material needed and
would require factories to be built in which those factories would release more toxic chemicals
into the air which ultimately would lead to the furthering poisoning of land and water.
With a growing global population, there is just that much more demand and with the law of
supply and demand coupled with Capitalisms system of competition it would continually require
an increase in production.
But in true Capitalism, in a society not run as a Nanny state where it isnt mixed 50/50 with
Socialism, this over-production would not be an issue because the cost of labor versus the cost of
the product would not allow millions of people who dont work the ability to purchase product
after product which really is the true nature of the problem. People who dont work are given so
much money and access to technology because of the underlying greed of banks, corporations, and
for political control. The Reagan/Bush/Obama phone for example. No one actually deserves
access to a $500 dollar iPhone and monthly minutes unless they pay for it. The people who have

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

these phones think they are getting over but they dont realize that the iPhone is subsidized by the
taxpayer, the middle class, in which the middle class taxes are redistributed to the makers of those
iPhones and Tracfones and the cellular and ISP providers like Verizon and AT&T. To their
CEOs, board members, and shareholders. Shareholders being BlackRock, State Street, Vanguard
and then distributed to the major individual shareholders.
And the reason why I say Reagan/Bush/Obama phones is because Ronald Reagan (R) started
the subsidized phone plan when they were landlines in the 1980s. George W. Bush (R) in the mid
2000s converted that program from landline to cellular. Around 2005 low income people started
getting Bush phones which later translated into Obama phones. But you never heard the right
or Fox News take credit for that did you? There are countless pieces of evidence that prove both
parties are owned and controlled by the same people and that the illusion of a two party system is
just that, an illusion. And the Reagan/Bush/Obama phone is just one of them.
What kind of privilege exists for people who dont work, get free phones, free minutes, free
housing, free food, EBT cards, free or discounted/subsidized utilities, cable TV, Internet, WIC,
and healthcare? What about the countless programs such as where children are diagnosed mentally
slow where the mother gets $500s a month per kid? What kind of privilege exists in which people
dont work yet enjoy a majority of the luxuries that the working class has? What kind of privilege
would you consider it when people barely have a grasp of the English language, read at a 5th grade
level, have no education or skill and are on welfare permanently but still have a roof over your
head, food, water, and utilitiesand a phone? Poor privilege? Lazy privilege?
Oh, you dont want to use the word lazy huh, that would misrepresent people as they arent
laying around because they are lazy, they do it because there is no access to jobs. Yet the same
group want to label privilege to an entire race. You cant compare career welfare recipients to lazy
people but you sure can label the entire White race privileged cant you? Can you say poor
privilege? Or is it more entitlement nation? Do you think the people in the USA have any idea how
the poor live in other countries? No, they dont. They have no idea! You have to see it for yourself
to appreciate it! Ive seen it in other countries. It is NOTHING compared to the luxury poor
Americans live in. But we want to mask that with White privilege.

So how do you slow demand and industrialization down? How do you slow production and
invention down? You downsize the root cause. Not just population wise but you take away access
to money, jobs, and quality education.
You slowly remove the middle class. And you suppress technology that would benefit mankind
which just happens to interfere with the Petrodollar scam and trillions of dollars in revenue from
the oil industry. Inventions to eliminate burning fossil fuels that were as green as it can get have
been shut down. Many corporations have bought the technology from the inventor and then buried
the technology. If the inventor didnt sell it, the patent was intentionally held up by the
bureaucracy or the inventor mysteriously died. This whole green agenda is a cover for global
taxation and global government.
White people have invented countless things over the last few hundred years that have changed
the world. Most inventions over the last few hundred years have come at the hand of White people
to include the telescope, microscope, automobile, television, electricity (AC and DC), aircraft, jet
engines, computers, the Internet, wireless technology, electrical engineering, the telephone, space
travel, combustion and diesel engines, the cotton gin, mobile phones, laptop computers, air

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

conditioning, calculators, the bulk of Mathematics, Physics, Chemistry, and Biology, medical
procedures, medicines, and so on. This last paragraph is for those who think these products
materialized out of thin air and to put a big middle finger up at Noel! But, the lack of promoting
this, the lack of promoting White achievements, White history, is part of a movement that is related
to White privilege. The .001 want to bury history and destroy nationalism and the American
Very few of you probably know who the heavyweight champion of the world is. He hasnt lost
for 10 years. He just happens to be White (Wladimir Klitschko). Most of you never heard of the
greatest MMA fighter of all time from Russia who went 10 years and 30 fights without a loss
(Fedor Emelianenko). Because he is White. You probably dont know that 3 of the top 5 pound
for pound boxers are White or that the number one ranked and belt holders in the top five divisions
in boxing are White. Cant market that to 100 percent of the population. Only to a fraction of the
market. That is why Floyd Mayweather get away with countless racist rants and still make $200
million dollars for a fight. Because big corporations made a billion off of it. That is why Bernard
Hopkins can say I will never lose to a white boy and still get hyped by ESPN. If Floyd or Bernard
had been White, all of Corporate America and the Media would have dropped them. Just like Hulk
Hogan. Hulk cant say anything that would be deemed racial but damn if Floyd or Bernard can!
Does that sound like equality or perhaps Black privilege? Its wealth privilege however,
minorities who serve the .001 percent certainly have more freedom to voice their racist opinion
than do White people. But is that Black privilege?
This is all a part of the movement that includes White privilege. Restrict Freedom of Speech!
Rich people want to cover the achievements up because most of those inventions are not theirs.
Very few ultra-rich people actually invented anything. They just happened to be able to raise the
capital and finance the inventions, produce them, market them, and sell them. The cost of many
inventions could not be funded by the inventor so they had to seek investors who took claim of the
patent and invention.
Nikola Tesla was never wealthy. The inventions and ideas were stolen. The patents were stolen.
Today you have people like George Soros and Warrant Buffet whove actually not produced or
invented anything but are multi-billionaires. They have made money by trading money or from
real estate. You have Facebook and Zuckerberg. A web based application he stole and made
billions from. If Facebook went down tomorrow, it wouldnt impact society the same as it would
had water or food not been available. It would impact Wall Street which would then impact society
because of how they manipulate the stock price and value of the company but the technology itself
is useless.
Speaking of Zuckerberg, hes been pushing the gay agenda and immigration Amnesty. Hes on
the list of people I visit if I am ever terminal!
Inventions and the byproducts of invention such as production, manufacturing, and distribution
require the need for continued consumption of natural resources but they also encourage
population growth.
Things the .001 percent do not want.


White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

Another reason the .001 do not want a strong middle class is because the more wealth and
knowledge people have, the harder it is to control and manipulate them. If everyone is poor and
uneducated controlling them is quite easy. If people have money, they can fight back. If they
dont, they become subservient because those very same people control the access to food, water,
and shelter. And that is another reason why there is a global push to remove cash. Complete
You see who the ruling class is right, Kings, Queens, Princes, Dukes etc. Just as it was 1,000
years ago, peasant uprisings needed to be quelled and that is all that is going on today. Except part
of the quelling is culling.
And if people are stupid, they are easily led and that definitely is the case in 2015. There is an
alarming amount of stupid people which allows the political establishment to advance their agenda.
That is the entire premise of the Limits of Growth. The Limits of Growth was a guide and was
of course executed but it was also adjusted and rewritten. It transitioned into a program called
Agenda 21 and Sustainable Development. These programs go well beyond just controlling
population growth as they started pushing the de-industrialization of Western countries while
simultaneously removing middle class wealth. Sustainable Development is something I highly
encourage you to do some research on because it affects you now whether you know it or not, and
will affect you even more in the future.
Does the green agenda ring a bell? Global warming? How about zero carbon footprint as
Barack Obama has spoken about in recent times, does that ring a bell? Youtube it, you can listen
to his speech. You can also listen to the people clapping and cheering about the effort to reduce
our carbon footprint to zero. You can also listen to Bill Gates saying the same thing.
Do you know why they are clapping and cheering? Neither do most of the people clapping and
cheering! They have no idea what that means, they are mindless drones who are stars struck when
public officials speak. Part of the Limits of Growth and the centerpiece of Agenda 21 and
Sustainable Development are to nearly halt all global manufacturing and production. And guess
what else that means?
Zero carbon footprint means little to NO fossil fuel burning machines will exist. That means
no automobiles running fossil fuels. No airplanes. No production. No manufacturing and so on.
Is a zero carbon footprint actually possible? By 2030 or 15 years from now like Obama claims is
the goal? Only if there is a reboot and the population is significantly downsized and a remainder
of what is left are sent back to the stone ages! With 7.2 billion people on the planet, it is
And a major initiative surrounding that is global warming. Global warming is nothing but
another attack on the middle class. It is a global tax the middle class will pay, thus draining what
is left of its wealth. It is another wealth transfer from the lower and middle classes to the people
who created the problem in the first place, the .001 percent. Whether you buy into global warming
or not, manmade, natural, solar, earth cycle, enhanced by mankind, the intent the US Government
and United Nations have has nothing to do with slowing it down or stopping it. That is beyond
human control.
It is part of the de-industrialization agenda.
One of the reasons for the White privilege movement!
It would be possible IF the entire planet could adapt to a new energy source in 15 years which it
cannot. 100s of millions of automobiles are on the road today, globally. Part of Bill Gates formula

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

also includes population size as in a reduction in population. Smaller population also means less
consumption. You can watch him talk about population reduction and denying access to life saving
healthcare as well.
Whites just fell into a decent job because they are White? Lets look at some stats and see if
there is any merit to that or if perhaps in general, job placement was earned.

Education and Unemployment

Unemployment by Race


And dont trust the unemployment rate for anyone! Its all manipulated!
High School graduation rate


Four year college graduation rate



SAT Scores
White 528 | Asian 517 | Hispanic 451| Black - 428
Asian 595 | White 536 | Hispanic 462 | Black - 428
Asian 528 | White 516 | Hispanic 444 | Black 417


White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

SAT- Reading
White 527 | Asian 518 | Hispanic 444 | Black - 428
Bachelors Degree in Economics
White - 64.2% | Asian -16.7% | Hispanic - 6.4% | Black - 5.3%
Bachelors Degree in Political Science and Public Administration
White 64.7% | Hispanic - 9.9% | Black - 9.4% | Asian - 6.4%
Bachelors Degree in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) Fields
White 67.8% | Asian - 9.8% | Black - 8.0% | Hispanic - 7.3% 46 to 15
The genetic aspect of this, IQ, 100 percent coincides with the stats above. I am not going to get
into that but genetically speaking, science is science and stats are stats. Of course it would be
interesting to see the stats from 50 or 100 years ago, prior to the West being adulterated by fluoride.
Many scientists claim IQs in the west have dropped several points each decade do to the toxic
fluoridation of the water. And that effects everyone!
But its racist to talk about actual stats isnt it? Instead, we can have heritage month for
everyone but White males. Sports Illustrated can put out What Ever Happened to the White
Athlete, Hollywood can put out White Men Cant Jump, Jungle Fever, Dear White People,
MTV and corporate owned Academia can spit out White privilege but wow, you cant actually
disclose facts for fear of being labeled a racist can you?




South Korea
United Kingdom
New Zealand


White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and


Czech Republic
United States
Sierra Leone
Cook Islands
Costa Rica


White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and


Myanmar (Burma) 87
Bahamas, The
Marshall Islands
Saudi Arabia
Solomon Islands
United Arab Emirates 84

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and


Papua New Guinea
Dominican Republic
El Salvador
Sri Lanka
South Africa
Cape Verde
Central African Rep
Saint Vincent
Antigua and Barbuda


White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and


Cote d'Ivoire
Burkina Faso
Gambia, The
Saint Lucia
Equatorial Guinea


Those Black countries arent doing so well are they? Racist? Nope, its science and actually real
life and factual. It also reflects the difference in cultures and job market.

Think the infiltration of immigrants and fluoride is conspiracy theory? Look at the IQ tests in 1960
in the USA and also compare them to the current world scores. With the family structure breaking
down, UN run education, and chemicals in the water, the country is getting dumber. And the IQ
scores will continue to decline as the West is overrun with less intelligent immigrants and while
our water and food are being laced with brain altering chemicals.
New Hampshire


White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

New Jersey
New York
North Dakota
New Mexico
Rhode Island
West Virginia
North Carolina



White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

For the people running this, they use race, but it isnt racism per se. They want everyone dumb
but a small group who they can control. The overall intellect for everyone is gradually declining
as a population whole. Dumbing people down so they dont question authority or unite in effort
and invent something they cant control.
Go read about fluoride and the dumbing down of society. Hitler did it to
his people and magically, during Operation Paperclip when all the Nazi
war criminals were brought to the UN and USA, fluorination started.
And IQs started dropping! Cant have you people thinking too much!
This is clearly why the employment rate is what it is which you will read
about later. But in short, if you promote someone who is less intelligent
into a position over someone who is more intelligent, you are not
optimizing that position. Multiply that and you now have a country in
Go look at the worlds smartest people. You wont find any Hispanic
or Blacks in the top 100. People throw around Neil Degrasse Tyson but
all he is, is a shill for the Oligarchy and they dont even disclose his IQ.
James Woods intelligence is likely higher than Neils at 180. Neil is where he is because he is
Black. If he were White, you would never know who he was! Look at Obama and Biden. Two
DUMB people but one can BS you and the other can publically speak. It does not translate into
intellect. The .001 dont need a genius speaking to idiots, they need something who can relate to
the average idiot. They need someone with good public speaking skills who can captivate the 30
percent of the minorities who are anti-White and weak minded and less intelligent White people!
And not that I have anything against Chinese or Indians, we all respect the work ethic and
culture, or at least I do, but look at the average IQ score. They are not smarter than Westerners,
they just happen to outnumber Westerners significantly and are controlled by oppressive
governments and a majority live in poverty so they are willing to work for what we consider
minimum wage. To them, its not minimum wage. Yet the stereotype of Indians and Asians are
smart and we need to hire them, we need to give them visas, is not quite what is really happening!
Driving down wages, breaking the backs of the White middle class as the PE continue to rob their
bank accounts while shipping jobs overseas or insourcing them.
Jews or Ashkenazi Jews?
Some studies claim Jews have the highest IQ. First of all, genetically there are no Jews. Jew
is a religious heritage so IQ based off of genetics is not quantified. There is no Jew gene and if
you look at Israels IQ scores which nearly fifty percent of the worlds Jews live in, the IQ scores
should reflect that. It is not the case as Israelis score 95. Jews are not a race, they are an ethnicity,
a religious ethnicity just like Muslim, Hindu, and Catholics are. This is a whole different topic but
it is tied to the same bigger picture that White privilege is tied too. Some Jews like to drop the I
am not White, Im Jewish Mike Wallace for example, who is as White as any White person,
dropped the Jew card in an interview with Morgan Freeman.
Mike Wallace: Black History Month, you find.
Morgan Freeman: Ridiculous.

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

Mike Wallace: Why?
Morgan Freeman: You're going to relegate my history to a month?
Mike Wallace: Come on.
Morgan Freeman: What do you do with yours? Which month is White History Month? Come on,
tell me.
Mike Wallace: I'm Jewish.
Sorry Mike, you are White. And I guarantee you do not practice the religion of Judaism or know
a single passage written in the Torah. But some Jews like to in part, ride the wave of victimology
and distance themselves from what the Oligarchy are doing to the White race. They dont want to
be associated with the so called racial injustices. Every person I know who has Jewish heritage
does not practice Judaism and are White. I joke with friends that everyone should change their
religion to Judaism just to watch the Media and establishment freak out. Because they could no
longer attack White people. We could all drop the anti-Semite card!
Part of the reason for the White privilege movement!
What else does the push for interracial marriages do?
It keeps everyone angry and divided and it gives the Black male population some false sense of
belonging. It also forces more and more Black females to provide for themselves. Most men are
territorial as are most wild animals. If another animal strays to close to the claimed female, it leads
to a confrontation. Human beings are no different. So now Hollywood and the corporations are
promoting hate by promoting one way racial couples. If the government, Hollywood, and
corporate leadership wanted people getting along they would not promote race at all or it would
be so random it would not appear to be obvious. You wouldnt think twice about a movie because
there is never a common theme. But you dont have that. Ninety percent of the music videos,
Hollywood movies, magazines, and commercials are specifically promoting one way interracial
If you promote something enough people will come to believe its the truth. Most of the Black
males nowadays because of the mind control method of promoting this day in and day out suffer
from James Bond syndrome where they just think every White woman out there wants them. And
if they dont, its because they are racist. So the Oligarchy are in a sense, attacking White women
by putting them in a position where race comes into place. Now they have the pressure of trying
to defend themselves when they are not interested. The Oligarchy are attacking White women by
ushering in millions of Muslims into Western countries. Obama is doing it, Bush did it, Australia
and England are doing it, France and German are doing it, and Sweden, which is the rape capital
of Europe, is definitely doing. Look at their rape rate because African Muslims! I encourage every
White male there to not only remove kill your leadership, but kill every Muslim you can find there!
First word of advice for anyone when someone drops the card. Get in their face and tell them to
GO **** themselves. You dont owe them an explanation. Your stance is your right, you dont
have to defend it.
One thing you can say Blacks are superior at is some sports that heavily involve foot speed. Most
sprinters and wide receivers in the NFL are black. You dont see to many world class sprinters
who are non-Black. Sure, you have the freakish fast White guy but that is 1 in 5 or 1 in 10. Bing
faster does not however, translate into being a better athlete. Athleticism isnt just running and

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

jumping, it includes all kinds of skills and traits. If Blacks were the best athletes, there would be
no White people in sports. But they are faster! Anyone who argues that isnt really looking at the
evidence. Is that racist to say? No, facts are facts! But, it does not mean Blacks are better athletes!
Take for example, the Olympics. Most of the medals were won by White people. The racist
movie White Men cant Jump is laughable. The Mens and Womens long and high jump
champions are White. Of course, you did not see the Media promoting that but they sure promoted
the Black gymnast didnt they. Who of course, dropped the race card! And most of the fighting
medals from boxing to karate, were White.
But the selling out and discrimination isnt new. Sports Illustrated was on the bandwagon in the


White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and


Any guesses as to what race Grace might be? Any guesses as to what
the results of Academia putting out a magazine What ever happened
to the intelligent Black man that they must have given up on school
because they were intellectually outmatched so they started playing
sports? I will touch up on sports later, and many other things!
Part of the reason for the White privilege movement!

In a time of universal deceit - telling the truth is a revolutionary act. - George Orwell
If you look at the top 10 or so jobs, their pay, and unemployment, they all fall within the STEM
Electrical Engineering
Aerospace Engineering
Computer Engineering
Pharma Science and Admin
Computer Science
Mechanical Engineering
Civil Engineering
Information Systems



In contrast to the more skilled fields, there also exists fields of study that tend to pay less and have
higher unemployment.

College majors with the highest unemployment

Clinical psychology
Miscellaneous fine arts
United States history


White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

Library science
Industrial & org psychology 10.4%
Visual & performing arts
Social psychology
International business
General social sciences
So what do all of these stats tell us? They tell us that Whites as a whole have a higher graduation
rate from high school. A higher graduation rate from college. Have higher SAT scores. And that
the technical, well-paying jobs in the technical field are predominately White. Whites and Asians
as a whole pursued a college major that was in demand. And have the highest average IQ.
If that is White privilege in the USA, then why dont the non-White people thrive in the cultures
they live in? Why dont those races experience privilege in their country of origin?
Is this racism?
How come you never hear Hispanics compared to Blacks? Blacks compared to Asians? Asians
compared to Hispanics? Its always an attack on Whites! It is ALWAYS White versus Black.
The reason why Asians and Whites excel is both due to intelligence and family structure. None
of those have anything to do with any type of entitlement or privilege!
The Federal Pell Grant is usually awarded to undergraduates who have a high degree of
unmet financial need. Students whose families have a total income of up to $50,000 may
be eligible for the need-based funding, though most Pell grant money goes to students
with a total family income below $20,000
Schooling is guaranteed by the federal government for the poor. Unless someone has defaulted
on a federal loan in the past, access to school is guaranteed! That is not by color that is by
income. It applies to everyone!
Is that a form of poor privilege? Not stuck with $10s of thousands of dollars in debt
when finishing school. But the middle class is! Aside from a scholastic or sports scholarships
which are rare, most middle class families have to finance college. And if the demographics
show Whites are 65% of the population and Pell Grants dont cover a majority of middle class
incomes, where is the White privilege if a majority of the middle class has to borrow from
the banks to go to college?
If Whites are approximately 65% of the population, then why would it be privilege if 65%
of the White population happens to have well-paying jobs? Statistically that is sound! So where
in these stats do you see White privilege? If you are just flat out racist or suffering from the
disease of liberal White guilt, these stats may not fit into your agenda but if you are remotely
intelligent or a rational individual who understands percentages then it should clearly make sense.
Globalization! Another reason for the White privilege movement!


White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and


Then You Have Welfare and Poverty!

Welfare Demographics (Percentage)

Poverty by race

39.8 %
38.8 %
15.7 %
2.4 %


Total by Race


Almost as many White people live on Welfare as a percentage and more White people are living
in poverty than both Hispanic and Blacks. Real Unemployment is NOT 5.5% like the Obama
Administration claims it is any more than when the Bush, Clinton, or Reagan Administrations
claimed it was low when they were in power.
Prior to the de-industrialization initiative, unemployment was calculated differently. The US
Government changed how it calculated unemployment so it could hide future unemployment
numbers that they knew would be impacted by the shipping of millions of jobs abroad and by
incorporating the Petrodollar into the financial system. During the Great Depression, the
unemployment rate was over 20 percent. The Government counted just about everyone who was
eligible to work in their numbers.
It included long and short term unemployment, those who were of age but disabled, and parttime workers. I know certain people are gaga over Obama as some were over Clinton so they refuse
to believe anything that doesnt coincide with their political view. They are blinded and living in
denial. I dont care how many times Obama tells you the economy is strong and that unemployment
is under 6 percent, they are lies. Just because the Media or a public official tells you something
does not make it so.
There are over 320 million people in the USA as of June 2015. If you factor long term
unemployment which is essentially someone who just gave up looking for work, that number alone
is near 93 million people.
Bureau of Labor Statistics: Nearly 93M Not Working: 36-year low for participation
in the workforce
According to new data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, a record 92,898,000
Americans did not participate in the workforce last month.
What does that mean, exactly? Well, for starters, it's not quite the same thing as saying
nearly 93 million Americans were unemployed. In fact, the unemployment rate declined
to 5.6 percent in December, capping off a year when, as Council of Economic Advisor
chairman Jason Furman said in a statement, unemployment fell faster than it had in three
62.8%: Labor Force Participation Has Hovered Near 37-Year-Low for 11 Months
(CNSNews.com) - The labor force participation rate hovered between 62.9 percent and
62.7 percent in the eleven months from April 2014 through February, and has been 62.9
percent or lower in 13 of the 17 months since October 2013.

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

Prior to that, the last time the rate was below 63 percent was 37 years ago, in March 1978
when it was 62.8 percent, the same rate it was in February.
"The civilian labor force participation rate, at 62.8 percent, changed little in February and
has remained within the narrow range of 62.7 to 62.9 percent since April 2014," the BLS
said in its release on the February employment data.
Then you have another 10-15 million people working part-time or on disability. That is well over
100 million people not in the workforce. If you counted every single person from new born babies
to retirees or in short, the entire population of 320 million people, the unemployment rate as
calculated during the Great Depression would still be near 30 percent. Now if you take the eligible
workforce and remove the retirees and everyone under the legal age limit to work, you are putting
the unemployment rate near 40%. And you can fact check that all you like but do it on a site that
does not begin with Fox News, MSNBC, or CNN because they are one in the same! Go look at
the Washington Examiner and Forbes which are reputable mainstream sites!
Wall Street adviser: Actual unemployment is 37.2%, 'misery index' worst in 40
Don't believe the happy talk coming out of the White House, Federal Reserve and
Treasury Department when it comes to the real unemployment rate and the true Misery
Index. Because, according to an influential Wall Street advisor, the figures are a fraud.
In a memo to clients provided to Secrets, David John Marotta calculates the actual
unemployment rate of those not working at a sky-high 37.2 percent, not the 6.7 percent
advertised by the Fed, and the Misery Index at over 14, not the 8 claimed by the
Marotta, who recently advised those worried about an imploding economy to get a gun,
said that the government isn't being honest in how it calculates those out of the workforce
or inflation, the two numbers used to get the Misery Index figure.
The unemployment rate only describes people who are currently working or looking for
work, he said. That leaves out a ton more.
What else does mainstream Media focus on? Poverty and welfare! MSNBC and CNN do it as a
racial divider and Fox News only does it when there is a Democrat in office. But neither are telling
the truth. They have an agenda. And guess who their face of poverty and welfare are? Minorities!
Historic Welfare Rates







White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

But as you can see, Whites on welfare is essentially equal to Blacks. But it hasnt always been this
way! Look at the increase over the last few decades! What else does this tell us?
The answer to this is a question. Who typically filled jobs in the auto, steel, manufacturing, and
production industry? Skilled labor jobs that included welders, mechanics, production line workers,
and so on? Typically from the 1900s through the 1970s, jobs were waiting for high school
students. Of all races! Middle class jobs!
Where are all of those jobs? NOT in the USA is where they are. All shipped abroad over the
last 40 years. And millions are also insourced. Insourced is basically bringing in foreign workers
on work visas. Many of the White families on welfare today were not on welfare 20-30 years ago.
Over the course of that time frame, steel mill after steel mill, auto manufacturer after auto
manufacturer have closed. Over that time, large corporations have put 10s of thousands of middle
class businesses out of business.
Another reason for the White privilege movement!
But it was a few here, a few there and localized so no one really noticed the national impact all
at once. But in 2015 the impact can be seen in Detroit, Michigan, Gary, Indiana, and countless
other cities and towns that relied on the steel and auto industry.
Do you really think they went after South Africa because of Apartheid? Or perhaps the real
reason was because a large middle class was appearing in which the .001 knew would be harder
to control! But what did the .001 use as their justification to attack South Africa? You got it, they
used the racial epithet. Go do some research on South Africa and how indigenous Black
Africans were prospering prior to the collapse of Apartheid and how in 2015 the country has one
of the highest crime rates in the world. Look at the amount of White people, especially farmers,
being murdered!
U.S. Poverty Highest Since 1960s
- Poverty rose to 15.7 percent in 2010, putting poverty at the highest level since 1965
- ONE out of every six people in the U.S. is living in poverty.
- The highest level on record is 22.4 percent, which occurred in 1959
Recovery: Record 23 Million American Households Receive Food Stamps
The March numbers the USDA released Friday reveal 23,116,441 households
enrolled in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), or food
stamps, each receiving an average monthly benefit of $274.30.
The number of individuals on SNAP did not break any records but remained high,
with 47,727,052 people enrolled in SNAP, receiving an average monthly benefit of
SNAP Benefits Will Be Cut for Nearly All Participants In November 2013
The 2009 Recovery Act's temporary boost to Supplemental Nutrition Assistance
Program (SNAP) benefits is scheduled to end on November 1, 2013, resulting in a
benefit cut for nearly every SNAP household.[2] For families of three, the cut will
be $29 a month -- a total of $319 for November 2013 through September 2014, the
remaining months of fiscal year 2014.[3] That's a serious loss, especially in light of
the very low amount of basic SNAP benefits. Without the Recovery Act's boost,

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

SNAP benefits will average less than $1.40 per person per meal in 2014. (See Table
2 for estimates of the size of the SNAP cut in each state in fiscal year 2014.)
Nationally, the total cut is estimated to be $5 billion in fiscal year 2014.
It seems unlikely that Congress will enact legislation to remedy this problem, as
President Obama and some members of Congress have proposed. Consequently,
states need to prepare for the benefit cuts -- including determining how they will
provide information about the upcoming benefit reduction to participating
households and other stakeholders as well as how to manage increased client
inquiries when the cut takes effect.

The College Scam

A typical Bachelors Degree in the United States is 120 credit hours or 40 classes. What do most
of these classes consist of? Only 10 of those 40 classes have any direct use on ones major, they
are CORE classes. For example, if one wants to be a Math or Engineer only 10 classes directly
relate to the degree. Another few are electives that have some bearing on the degree but are not a
core class. So what about the remaining 25+ classes? A bunch of useless classes that most people
dont need nor will ever remember or are refreshers from high school; and most of us know this!
If college wasnt meant to drain wealth and instead was intended to make people productive in
society, it wouldnt cost a fortune and you wouldnt be forced to take 70 credit hours of classes
you will never use in life. But they tell you its to round you.
And the .001 got a hold of the education system and used low income which liberals identify
as minorities to create the Head Start Program run by the Department of Health and Human
Services that is supposed to provide access to childhood education, health, nutrition, and parent
involvement services to low-income children and their families. Its another program that has
failed miserable and produced nothing but cost the taxpayers 100s of billions over the course of
50 years! Taxes that hit the middle class the hardest!

The Reason for College

Why is the current education system and cost in place? Why isnt it free? For a few reasons and
pay attention! As you already read, the wealthy want to control the middle class which they do in
a number of ways.
- One, you typically cant get a well-paying job in most cases if you dont have a college degree.
- Two, the .001 percent own the colleges and the businesses that hire people that require a degree.
They are destroying small businesses with high taxes and healthcare that most of corporate
America doesnt pay taxes so they have everyone over a barrel. So for most people, you HAVE to
get an expensive student loan. You cant go work in the factories and starting a business is getting
more difficult. They also make a lot more money the longer you are in college. You are also
already a debt slave when you graduate college and with them outsourcing and insourcing jobs,


White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

they know you have a large college debt and will work for whatever they offer you. Because they
have Uncle Sam whom they own, who will garnish your paycheck to ensure they get paid!
So the .001 percent control your access to college and your access to the job market! They
control you the moment you enter college by controlling your debt and job placement. It will take
most students decades to pay back their college loans WITH interest.
Who makes minimum wage?
Given the continuing campaigns by unions, workers, politicians and others to raise the
federal minimum wage, it bears asking: Just who are minimum-wage workers, anyway?
Perhaps surprisingly, not very many people earn minimum wage, and they make up a
smaller share of the workforce than they used to. According to the Bureau of Labor
Statistics, last year 1.532 million hourly workers earned the federal minimum of $7.25 an
hour; nearly 1.8 million more earned less than that because they fell under one of several
exemptions (tipped employees, full-time students, certain disabled workers and others),
for a total of 3.3 million hourly workers at or below the federal minimum.
That group represents 4.3% of the nations 75.9 million hourly-paid workers and 2.6% of
all wage and salary workers. In 1979, when the BLS began regularly studying minimumwage workers, they represented 13.4% of hourly workers and 7.9% of all wage and salary
workers. (Bear in mind that the 3.3 million figure doesnt include salaried workers,
although BLS says relatively few salaried workers are paid at what would translate into
below-minimum hourly rates. Also, 23 states, as well as the District of Columbia, have
higher minimum wages than the federal standard; people who earned the state minimum
wage in those jurisdictions arent included in the 3.3 million total.)
People at or below the federal minimum are:
Disproportionately young: 50.4% are ages 16 to 24; 24% are teenagers (ages 16 to 19).
Mostly (77%) white; nearly half are white women.
Largely part-time workers (64% of the total).
30+% Whites on welfare and 77% earning minimum wage. That sure sounds like White
privilege to me!
This is why college has gone from being an educational institution to a business and why college
football and basketball take precedence over education. College has very little to do with job
placement and everything to do with corporate and bank profits and debt. How many college and
pro athletes, especially in football, are accused of stealing, rape, drug possession, drinking and
driving, and assault and never end up going to jail? The PR and legal aspect is controlled 100
percent by the .001 percent in which a pathetic speech is given by the athlete that was written by
the PR team for the purpose of damage control. Then the corporate Media goes after the accuser
or victim through intimidation, threats of lawsuits, etc. while doing all they can to make their
accused aggressor seem innocent. Its because that individual represents a major monetary asset
to the .001 percent. They know that individual can make the .001 percent money in a variety of
ways from actually playing the sport to pimping Nike or Reebok apparel. These people are an
investment and that is it. But who is the Media going after? Tom Brady. Obviously deflating a

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

football is more of a concern than raping, stealing, drunk driving, assault, and drug possession are.
White privilege?
LeGarrette Blount punched a White Boise State player after loss. He got suspended for a few
games and played in the bowl game and later went into the NFL. He smoked marijuana in the NFL
and got a ONE game suspension. Never charged with assault either. Ray Rice assaulted his fianc,
no jail time and still in the NFL. Rashard Casey who played football at Penn State and is Black
assaulted a White police officer because he was walking with a Black woman. Not charged and
not labeled a hate crime. There is an epidemic of hate crime going on and that happens to be Black
on White but the Media refuses to cover it and law enforcement refuses to label them hate crimes.
Hundreds upon hundreds annually! ONLY when the victim is a minority is it a hate crime. Only
when the cop is White and the victim is Black is it reported. But they sure went after Dillon Roof,
pumped up the racist rhetoric, and then associated racism with the Confederate Flag. The same
Confederate Flag Bill Clinton and Al Gore ran on during their 1992 presidential campaign!

The latest mass shooting by Muslim Mohammad Youssef Abdulazeez in which multiple Marines
were killed. The leftists Media refused to mention guns or Islam and its only been a couple
days and the news is almost dead. The bought and paid for FBI cant find a stressor either. Magic!
Nothing to do with him being a Muslim extremist or terrorist but damn if every liberal news
channel didnt identify Dillon Roof with the racist Confederate Flag or him with Whites.
You sure dont hear much about Leon Trotsky or Joseph Stalin and how they destroyed Russia.
Or how Stalin is tied to 50 million people dying during World War II and over 60 million Christians
died during World War II. But who do we hear about all the time? You always hear about Adolph
Hitler and the slaughter of 6 million Jews. There were not even 6 million Jews living in Europe so
how did that number come about? Why do we not talk about Stalin or mention honor the 30
million civilians who were killed during World War II?
Is that White privilege?
Here's a list of every suspended NFL player heading into 2014 season
For now, all 39 players on this list are suspended.
WR Dwayne Bowe, Kansas City
LB Nigel Bradham, Buffalo
WR Marlon Moore, Cleveland

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

QB Dominique Davis, free agent
Two games (3)
DB Chris Lewis-Harris, Cincinnati
DB Brandon Meriweather, Washington
RB Ray Rice, Baltimore
Three games (1)
WR Jerome Simpson, Minnesota
Four games (21)
WR Stedman Bailey, St. Louis
DE Frank Alexander, Carolina
DB Brandon Browner, New England
DB Jakar Hamilton, Dallas
OL Eric Herman, New York Giants
OL Lane Johnson, Philadelphia
DB Reshad Jones, Miami
DE Dion Jordan, Miami
LB Robert Mathis, Indianapolis
K Matt Prater, Denver
WR Ace Sanders, Jacksonville
DB Orlando Scandrick , Dallas
OL Donald Stephenson, Kansas City
WR Brian Tyms, New England
WR Wes Welker, Denver
DB Jayron Hosley, New York Giants
LB Erin Henderson, free agent
DL Spencer Nealy, free agent
OL Rokevious Watkins, free agent
DL Brandon Moore, free agent
LB Jake Knott, free agent
Six games (2)
DB Will Hill, Baltimore
Colts owner Jim Irsay
Eight games (1)
RB Andre Brown, free agent


White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

Nine games (1)
LB Aldon Smith, San Francisco
10 games (1)
DL Josh Brent, retired, Cowboys own rights
Indefinitely suspended (Can apply for reinstatement after the 2014 season) (6)
WR Justin Blackmon, Jacksonville
WR Josh Gordon, Cleveland
DB Tanard Jackson, Washington
LB Daryl Washington, Arizona
WR LaVon Brazill, free agent
TE Fred Davis, free agent
Mostly non-White and the bad part, most of these people who are suspended for substance abuse,
illegal drug possession, firearms possession, drinking and driving, or for assault, got less publicity
and smaller sentences than Tom Brady.
Raping the Middle Class College Student

The Cost
In most surveys, in-state public college for the 2014 academic year averaged $22,800 and private
college averaged $44,750 a year. In 2009, spending by Americans for post-secondary education
totaled $461 billion, an amount 42% greater than in 2000, after accounting for inflation. This $461
billion is the equivalent of 3.3% of total U.S. gross domestic product (GDP) and an amount greater
than the total GDP of countries such as Sweden, Norway and Portugal.
Today, another attack on the middle class is requiring students to have their parents co-sign on
loans. The Government and .001 know there are few jobs and that there will be less jobs in the
future and they dont care, because they are gearing toward that. Look at all the college grads, 30
percent, earning minimum wage. They wont be able to pay back $100,000 dollar student loans!
And what few jobs that will exist, will pay far less because theyve flooded the market with 10s of
millions of foreigners and illegal immigrants. What they cant control however, is if all of todays
students take out 100s of billions of dollars in loans but cant pay them back because they cant
find work.
So how do the banks ensure they get paid?
They direct the government to require colleges to go after the parents. So obviously if your W2 falls within an income category deemed middle class the parents are on the hook for paying
the loan back in the event the child cant find a job.
Another reason for the White privilege movement!
And in 2015, 500,000 minimum wage employees are college graduates. How many people can
make under $8.00 an hour and pay $500 a month in student loans? And dont forget, the Democrats
had the opportunity to extend the student loan interest rate bill when they had full control of
Congress. But instead, they let the bill expire which doubled the interest rate to over 6 percent.

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

So what business is it of anyones that a college would mandate a prospective student get their
parent(s) to co-sign for a loan? Because the banks know that 50% of the future workforce will
only be able to find a job that just gets them by. Service industry type of jobs in which they wont
make enough to pay back their overinflated, overpriced student loan with interest plus be able to
survive on their own. Why do you think so many majors exist to include build your own major?
Colleges and banks dont care if you cant find a decent job, they will get your cash either way.
There are so many made up BS degrees that offer no tangible use to the market place yet those
people who waste 5 years taking BS courses who are really more interested in partying than they
are going into the workforce will blame the Republicans when they cant find work!
So all the middle class parents today will in the future, have to tap into investments such as
stocks and bonds, tap into their retirement funds and into their equity in their home with home
equity loans or second mortgages. And that goes directly to the banks! The less equity one has in
their home, the more ownership the bank has. The more one owns on a house, the more interest
they are paying to the banks!
And weve established that at least 65% of the middle class is White. So guess who is impacted
the most with this mandate to co-sign on loans?
Yes, White people.
A reason for the White privilege movement!
The insane costs of school! And most have to finance food and housing as well!

Housing and Meals

For the academic year of 2014, housing and meal costs ranged from $9,500 at four-year public
schools to $10,830 at private schools annually.

Books and School Supplies

For the 2014 school year books and supplies cost around $1,207 at public colleges and $1,253 at
private colleges. Some of the bigger schools and their ANNUAL cost to attend, if you can even
get in, includes tuition, fees, room, board, books etc. This does not factor in any type of scholarship
or grant.
Louisiana State Univ.
Brigham Young Univ.
Oklahoma State University
Univ. of Nebraska
Purdue University Calumet
University of Oklahoma
The Univ. of Texas at El Paso
Florida State University
University of Arkansas
Texas A&M Univ.
Univ. of Iowa and Kansas

Total Cost

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

Chicago State University
University of Wisconsin
Indiana University Bloomington
Univ. of Georgia
U. of South Carolina
Univ. of Kentucky
Univ. of Tennessee
The Ohio State University
Purdue University
Southern Ill Univ. Carbondale
University of Washington
University of Michigan
Temple University
Miami University
Penn State University Park
McKendree University
Culinary Inst. of Am.
Gonzaga Univ.
DePaul Univ.
Juilliard School
Saint Louis University
Rice Univ.
Duke Univ.
Princeton University
Villanova Univ.
Harvard University
Notre Dame
Brown Univ.
Yale University
Georgetown Univ.
Boston Univ.
Cornell Univ.
University of Southern California
The Johns Hopkins University
Northwestern Univ.
Oberlin College
Carnegie Mellon
Dartmouth College
Columbia Univ.
New York University


For most, if you want to go to a major university you are going to spend anywhere from $75,000
to near $250,000 for just a Bachelors degree. This does not even factor in people who change

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

majors or continue onto their Graduate or Post-Graduate Degrees. These high end schools for the
most part, like Harvard, Yale, Princeton, reserve most of their seats for the sons and daughters of
former alumni, especially the ones who contribute to the school, to foreigners, and to individuals
who are being vetted in the political arena. Very few people who are not in those categories get
into these prestigious schools. Some wealth privilege in there! And mostly discrimination!
Here are a few examples into how college is nothing but a money making scam. This is
calculated over 30 years which for loans in the $75,000 range and up is likely the route most
students will take, at least until they can find a decent paying job and at the current interest rate
which is between 3 and 7%. Of course there are subsidized loans with lower percentage points.
Any guess as to who benefits from them? Not the middle class! This is like a house payment for
millions of college graduates, without actually owning a house!
The student paying $75,000
Monthly Payment: $449.66
Loan Amount


The student paying $100,000

Monthly Payment: $599.55
Loan Amount
$115,838 $100,000



The student paying $200,000

Monthly Payment: $1,199.10
Loan Amount
$231,676 $200,000.00 $431,676
The student paying $300,000
Monthly Payment: $1,798.65
Loan Amount
$347,515 $300,000.00


For individuals who want to achieve advanced degrees, they very well may end up with student
loan debt over $300,000.
"During the 201314 school year, colleges and universities are expected to award 943,000
associates degrees; 1.8 million bachelor's degrees; 778,000 master's degrees; and
177,000 doctor's degrees."
Approximately 3.7 million people graduate from college each year. The current outstanding
balance or debt on student loans is around $1,000,000,000,000 or One Trillion dollars. At 7
percent the bankers (.001 percent) are earning $7.01 billion dollars a month. That is a month!
Annually that is $84.8 billion dollars a year. If you know anything about how the fractional reserve
system works then you know this is the biggest con of all time. If you dont, in short, the bank
doesnt own 90 percent of the money they lend. And that is not an exaggeration either. Fractional
Reserve banking mandates that a bank only has to have 10 percent of the money on hand, in

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

reserve. The rest is a digital transaction. So out of that $1 trillion in student loans, the banks
cumulatively only have around $100 billion in their vaults. That is why bank runs are a threat and
why there is a move to eliminate cash. And its why Greece is in trouble. The Oligarchy stole
trillions from that country as they have every other country and between pensions and government
aid, there is not a fraction of the cash actually in the banks! You can say that the banks are insolvent
because 90 percent of their money was stolen because it was put there digitally.
Over the life of that loan the students will have paid $1,120,337,591,825.28 or $1.1 trillion
dollars in interest. The banking cartel has $100 billion in the bank but when its all said and done
will get $2.1 trillion between principle and interest.
Do you see a reason why college costs so much now?
Its a business!
If you dont already know this, you will gradually find out but the individuals who control the
bankers control the world and are the ones ultimately responsible for the world economy, jobs
being outsourced and insourced, and for the GLOBAL Depression we are in. And something else
to think about. Congress talking about forgiving student loan debt. College students cant find
jobs because of the very same people who outsourced them all, arent receiving interest payments
because a significant amount of the workforce graduating from college either cant find a job. You
cant garnish money if someone isnt working!
So in walks Elizabeth Warren and the government. Talking about saving the workforce. But
they are not doing this to save the workforce or to help people out. They bring this up to ensure
the bankers get paid. And this is the same Elizabeth Warren who voted YES to Amnesty which
completely contradicts her so called position on education and helping the middle class.
They wont bailout the people who have jobs or are paying on the student loans though, they
will only bail out people who arent paying their loans back. They wont bail out any middle class
families who have any type of assets. If the middle class family has assets, they will be liquidated
in order to pay back 100 percent of a loan in which the bank only invested 10 percent.
Government aid pays more than a minimum-wage job in 35 states
A new study from the Cato Institute reveals that welfare and other government benefits
pay more than a minimum-wage job in 35 states.
In fact, welfare and other government benefits pay more than a minimum-wage job in 35
states and in 13 states, the payout is more than $15 an hour, according to a new study
from libertarian think tank The Cato Institute. The study found that the assistance
defined in the study as including government benefits such as food stamps, housing
assistance and other programs pays more than a first-year teachers salary in 11 states,
the starting salary for a secretary in 39 states and an entry-level job as a computer
programmer in three states.
And this is why insourcing of 100,000s of jobs is taking place in the STEM field. Corporate
America is trying to drive down the cost of labor in the United States by importing 100s of
thousands of foreigners who are employed by manpower companies at half the cost while not
paying into social and entitlement programs. Most of the individuals who are employed at
Microsoft, Dell, Intel, Cisco, etc. who are on visas, are actually employees of a manpower
company, not the actual company they work for so companies like Microsoft, Dell, Intel, Cisco
etc. dont pay any taxes or benefits on these employees. No money is paid in state or federal tax,

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

no money is paid into social security, and no money is paid into Medicare. Exempt from the
ObamaCare tax as well which SMALL businesses are not. Another reason why the federal
government and every state in the Union is in debt trillions of dollars!
Driving down the cost of labor also removes income to spend frugally, it removes the ability to
get ahead and pay down the interest on debt which further enslaves the masses! Who own small
businesses? Middle class and typically White. Small business was the largest employer, not big
business. But big businesses like Wal-Mart, Sams Club, Target, Home Depot, and Lowes have
put 10s of thousands of middle class families out of business. To be replaced with barely
minimum wage jobs that dont cover healthcare! Healthcare the state is left to pay and the state
gets its money from taxation. And who pays the most in taxes? Middle class!
Another reason for the White privilege movement!
Look at the income brackets for example.
$1 - $15,000
$15,000 - $30,000
$30,000 - $50,000
$50,000 - $100,000
$100,000 - $250,000
$250,000 - $1,000,000
$1,000,000 or MORE

Share of Income

Share of Income Tax Paid



The bottom two classes contribute to -9% of the income which is operating at a deficit. The bottom
two tax brackets only pay 3-8% of a share of their income which they get back during tax season
in addition to what they paid in, hence why they are -9% as a share of income taxes paid. The
bottom 3 tax brackets are at -5% percent.
Then you take the middle class and even the lower upper class. Their share of income paid is 26%
and 27%. But when you get to the Oligarchy, the .001 percent, their share is less than half of the
middle classes. The .001 percent pay less of a share of their income than the $30,000 to $50,000
bracket! Who pays the biggest share of their income? The middle class! And who represents over
60% of the middle class?
The .001 percent dont pay billions of dollars toward Medicare, social security, or ObamaCare
because what they are taxed on those programs is capped. For Medicare and social security, the
.001 percent is capped at just over $118,000 dollars. So the people making $100 million a year,
are only taxed on $118,000 for social security and $225,000 for Medicare. Who pays the most
share of their income in taxes?
The middle class of which 60%+ is White!
One of the reasons for the White privilege movement!
Free Trade and Immigrations is a Crime against the Constitution!
Jim DeMint: Immigration Reform Will Cost U.S. Trillions
Amnesty will cost American taxpayers at least $6.3 trillion in welfare and other public
benefits, according to a Heritage Foundation study.

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

Foundation has found that after amnesty, current unlawful immigrants would receive $9.4
trillion in government benefits and services and pay more than $3 trillion in taxes over
their lifetimes. That leaves a net fiscal deficit (benefits minus taxes) of $6.3 trillion. That
deficit would have to be financed by increasing the government debt or raising taxes on
U.S. citizens.
The Fiscal Burden of Illegal Immigration on U.S. Taxpayers
The cost of harboring illegal immigrants in the United States is a staggering $113 billion
to $346 billion a year. Allowing this group to be added to the welfare system, food stamps
etc. legally will add a significant cost to the economy. It will drive up taxes on guess
who? Yeah, on the middle class again.
Illegal alien migration into the United States costs American taxpayers $346 billion
annually reported by the National Research Council. While employers of illegal aliens
rake-in billions of dollars, the US citizens subsidize what may be called organized
"Slavery in 21st Century America.
While Congress facilitates outsourcing, insourcing and off-shoring of American jobs by
the thousands weekly, that same Congress imports 182,000 legal immigrant monthly who
need jobs. Another estimated 100,000 illegal aliens arrive each month without jobs. All
those immigrants seize jobs from American citizens at slave wages.
Estimates peg the annual costs of illegal immigration at the federal, state and local level
to be about $113 billion although some estimates go up to $346 billion; nearly $29 billion
at the federal level and $84 billion at the state and local level.
Muchas gracias!
Notre Dame will now accept, heavily subsidize illegal immigrants! The University of
Notre has announced that it will now admit illegal immigrants and give them generous
amounts of money from school coffers to ease the burden of the schools annual cost for
tuition, room and board of over $57,000.
How Immigrants Without Legal Status Can Pay for College
More than 1 million immigrant children without legal status reportedly live in the United
States. Roughly 65,000 graduate from high school each year, but experts estimate that
fewer than 6,500 go on to attend college.
Two major barriers a lack of information and assistance often prevent immigrant teens
without legal permission from continuing their education, says Laura Bohorquez,
coordinator of the DREAM Educational Empowerment Program at United We Dream, a
nonprofit immigrant advocacy organization.
"Unfortunately, we're still getting a lot of questions from students thinking that because
they're undocumented, they can't access higher education," Bohorquez says. Students

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

without legal status have options, though, including laws at the state level that allow some
noncitizens to receive in-state tuition at state colleges and universities, and Deferred
Action for Childhood Arrivals, an executive order issued by President Barack Obama that
gives some young immigrants often referred to as DREAMers temporary resident
status and a pathway to work legally.
Illinois Dream Fund Starts Scholarships for Illegal Immigrant Students
We are witnessing a period of extraordinary
growth within the undocumented immigrant
community. The world is constantly changing,
and with that change, come great challenges
and opportunities. Regardless of what lies
ahead, we are certain of one thing; access to
education for undocumented immigrants, is
essential for the growth of Illinois and this
Tomorrows leaders will need to be able to be
great thinkers, possessing both wisdom and
depth of understanding. And they must have a
profound sensitivity to peoples needs and motivations. The Illinois Dream Fund
Scholarship seeks to create access to financial resources to further this growth and
development for the immigrant leaders of tomorrow. With the generous offerings of
private donors and in-kind donations, the Illinois Dream Fund Scholarship provides
scholarships to undocumented students, who are incoming freshmen or current
undergraduates that possess at least a 2.5 GPA (on a 4 point scale).
Tanya Cabrera
Illinois Dream Fund
Imagine a country and its leadership who pay military soldiers low wages, dont provide them
proper VA care. Imagine a country and its leadership who cuts funding for military programs
that benefit active duty soldiers. Imagine a country and its leadership who force middle class
families to take out student loans on behalf of their children. Imagine a country and leadership
that treats the military and its own citizens worse than they would an illegal immigrant who
has done absolutely nothing for the country! That is not something to imagine, that is
something that exists in the United States in 2015. Was this the Hope and Change you were
looking for?


White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

Illegal Immigration Tuition
Offers in-state tuition

Planning to offer it

California (D)
Illinois (D)
Kansas (R)
Nebraska (R)
New Mexico (D)
New York (D)
Oklahoma (R)
Texas (R)
Utah (R)
Washington (D)
Nevada (D)
Virginia (D)

Florida (D)
Hawi (D)
Maryland (D)
Massachusetts (D)
Minnesota (D)
New Hampshire (D)
New Jersey (D)
North Carolina (R)
Oregon (D)
South Carolina (R)
Tennessee (R)

How exactly is it illegal to employ an illegal immigrant but its not illegal to issue them a state
ID or provide them with college, home loans, student loans, credit cards and auto loans? You can
do all of that without a social security number.
Yes, banks like Bank of America give home loans, credit card loans etc. to people without
social security numbers. Whatever losses take place will be written off of their tax liability because
the US Government allows these losses to be written off plus the banks will make the money from?
The middle class in the form of fees and higher interest rates.
A reason for the White privilege movement!

What Would Finish the Middle Class?

AMNESTY and the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP)
Part of a nations sovereignty lies within its borders and ability to defend it. Another part lies
within foreign trade and tariffs. A country that has allowed 11.5 million people into the country
who are not legally permitted to do so has in fact, been invaded. Would we tolerate China or
Russia or any other country for that matter to fly dozens of aircraft into U.S. airspace? What about
just a dozen Russian soldiers in uniform and armed, walking across the Mexican or Canadian
No, in fact we wouldnt tolerate one plane entering our airspace unless it had permission nor
would we allow one soldier to walk across the border. That would be an act of war. Yet, here we
are as Americans, with 11+ million people invading the country and nothing being done. Some not
so mainstream experts think we have closer to 50 million already residing here.
Chinas current standing army is 2,285,000 active soldiers with 2,300,000 reservists. India has
1,325,000 and 2,143,000 reservists, and Russias current standing army is 766,000 with 2,485,000
reservists. In order of strength, Russia has the second strongest military, China is 3rd, and India is
Just to set the record straight:

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

The entire standing military which include active duty and reservists for Russia, China, and India
is 11.3 million compared to 11.5 million illegal immigrants. The Illegal immigrant population in
the United States of America is greater than the military of Russia, China, and India! We dont call
that a foreign invasion or do anything about it? We dont think the nations sovereignty has been
threatened? What about treason committed by our entire leadership for the last 50 years?
Most people I know, including myself, understand that some come here looking for better
opportunities, a better life. But the reality is opportunity is created because one has a skill that is
in demand; it isnt handed out. The only opportunity most of the millions of people flooding into
the United States will have access to is a low income unskilled job.
IF they can even find a job!
There are many that dont care about what this does to the country or arent smart enough to
understand what is going, most dont understand the security and safety issues or the economics
or implications; they live in a dream world.
Most of us dont care if immigrants come here legally as long as they contribute and assimilate
and its restricted to people who benefit America. They should conform to the nations laws and
its ways. In general, todays immigrants dont. They are nothing but welfare seekers and come
here knowing they will get free handouts they can wire back to their families abroad. If there was
assimilation happening, there wouldnt be press 2 for Spanish. There wouldnt be foreign flags
waving over the American flag.
Todays immigrants have no loyalty to the American flag. They dont feel they should have to
learn English nor do they think they should have to follow our customs or laws, specifically in the
case of Sharia. But this isnt necessarily all the immigrants fault. It is politicians fault and it is
Corporate Americas fault. Illegal immigrants are being promised something that will never be
delivered which is the false promise of equality and prosperity! Politicians and corporations are
both preying on the hopes and dreams of millions while destroying a country for the advancement
of an age old agenda. They prefer power and profit over nationalism and sovereignty! Politicians
only use nationalism when they need soldiers to die for them abroad.
A Politicians job, the Presidents job is to constitutionally enforce the laws that are in place;
specifically in this case, the 14th amendment. Politicians to include the President promote and
encourage illegal immigrants to get on welfare, to enroll in the food stamp program and in many
states offer them drivers licenses and free college tuition. That is criminal!
That is blatantly breaking the law.
But with knowing how free trade has impacted certain countries, its understandable why people
come to the country. Take Mexico for instance, Mexicans account for 56-60 percent of todays
illegal immigrants. Now why would millions leave Mexico to come to America when most
employers in America cant hire them legally? Why wouldnt people from South and Central
America migrate to Mexico and why wouldnt Mexicans just stay? Mexico is beautiful and has
thousands of miles of coastal property, thick jungles, and national tradition. Why would you leave
that to come to the USA?
Drug cartels are not helping that is for sure, but that isnt it in and by itself!
It's because Mexico doesn't have the ability to print billions of dollars. In fact, the United States is
essentially the only country that can do it and get away with it because of central banks and its
military enforcement arm. Mexico does not have a Federal Reserve System or a currency backed
by oil or the Petrodollar as the United States does, which masks the spending and borrowing
problem. So, Mexico cant provide its citizens hundreds of billions in food stamps, free housing,

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

and dozens of other welfare based programs. In short, Mexico does not have a printing press to
print endless amounts of money or a middle class to tax to cover interest payments.
Being anti-immigration has absolutely NOTHING to do with race!
This is about the well-being of the United States.
This is about its sovereignty.
This is about the future of Americans.
This is about the future of American children and their children.
This is not about race, religion, ethnicity, gender, or anything else. If Amnesty and free trade
jeopardize the nations sovereignty and financial state and politicians and corporations are pushing
for it, what does this tell you about the Media and the people who own the Media and their agenda?
Clearly if they support programs that will destroy the nations sovereignty then they are in fact
committing treason! If America wasnt so generous with welfare, people wouldnt migrate here
either. But then again, J.P. Morgan makes billions on the food stamp program. Tracfone, ATT, etc.
make billions on Reagan/Bush/Obama phones. Do you think they might want to see more people
on food stamps or in poverty?
Yes, exactly!
America is in decline because of its corrupted leaders, the bankers, and corporations. Not because
of unqualified workers or a declining work ethic among those who want to work!

The Immigration Race Card

Tired of the whole debate? Tired of the liberal agenda and race baiting? Lets debunk the
propaganda the liberal Media is spreading!
Too many people use certain words in the wrong context, especially the liberals base that
seem to have a form of turrets syndrome where they just spout out words like racist, bigot,
homophobe, and sexist uncontrollably. I cant say if its ignorance or stupidity but the excessive
abuse of certain words shows the illiteracy in society and that needs identified before the topic can
be properly addressed. It also shows how the Media, Congress, and Corporate America are
successful at exploiting the dumbed down society while simultaneously being able to push their
agenda forward.
Noun: A person who believes that a particular race is superior to another. Adjective:
Having or showing the belief that a particular race is superior to another.
Noun: The belief that all members of each race possess characteristics or abilities specific
to that race, esp. so as to distinguish it as inferior or superior to another race or races.
Adjective: Unlawful; illegitimate; illicit; or unlicensed.
Noun: A person who comes to live permanently in a foreign country.


White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

Adjective: Not recorded in or proved by documents
Synonyms: illegal, illicit, illegitimate, against the law
Unlawful = illegal, against the law + immigrant = A person who comes to live permanently in a
foreign country = illegal + immigrant = illegal immigrant.
See, that wasnt difficult, was it? ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT!
Still, with the Progressive left wing it is difficult because if you dont agree with these tolerant
people (laughter), regardless if you provide facts or not; out comes the racist, sexist or bigot card.
Communist Progressives, Congress and the Media push the agenda however they can, at any
expense, even if they have to remove Constitutional rights such as Freedom of Speech and
Freedom of Expression or by dividing the country. The ridiculous race baiting in terms of illegal
immigrations is embarrassing. Our liberal Media and Congress are the laughing stock of the
If approximately 56% of illegal immigrants are from Mexico; 22% are from other Latin
American countries, primarily from Central America; 13% are from Asia; 6% are from Europe
and Canada; and 3% are from Africa then what race would an illegal immigrant be? On top of that,
Mexican is an ethnicity and Central and South America contain many races, not a single race, just
like the United States. That would be like Americans illegally immigrating to South America and
their liberal base saying its racist to say anything negative about them or their migration patterns.
What race is the United States of America? All of them! So arguing that anyone who is against
illegal immigrations is a racist is nothing more than unintelligent people who lost the battle of the
mind and feel they need to have the last word, so they drop the race card.
So what is in the Amnesty Bill otherwise known as S. 744: Border Security, Economic
Opportunity, and Immigration Modernization Act?
First, lets identify who voted YES for this in the Senate in June 2013. This bill has still not
been introduced into the House of Representatives as of June 2015.
Marco Rubio, Jeffrey Chiesa, John Hoeven, Mark Begich, Lisa Murkowski, Jeff Flake, McCain
John, Mark Pryor, Boxer, Barbara, Dianne Feinstein, Michael Bennet, Mark Udall, Richard
Blumenthal, Christopher Murphy, Thomas Carper, Chris Coons, Bill Nelson, Mazie Hirono, Brian
Schatz, Richard Durbin, Mark Kirk, Joe Donnelly, Tom Harkin, Mary Landrieu, Susan Collins,
Angus King, Benjamin Cardin, Barbara Mikulski, Mo Cowan, Elizabeth Warren, Carl Levin,
Debbie Stabenow, Al Franken, Amy Klobuchar, Claire McCaskill, Max Baucus, Jon Tester, Dean
Heller, Harry Reid, Kelly Ayotte, Jeanne Shaheen, Jeffrey Chiesa, Bob Menndez, Martin
Heinrich, Tom Udall, Kirsten Gillibrand, Chuck Schumer, Kay Hagan, Heidi Heitkamp, John
Hoeven, Sherrod Brown, Jeff Merkley, Ron Wyden, Bob Casey, John Reed, Sheldon Whitehouse,
Lindsey Graham, Tim Johnson, Lamar Alexander, Bob Corker, Orrin Hatch, Patrick Leahy, Bernie
Sanders, Timothy Kaine, Mark Warner, Maria Cantwell, Patty Murray, Joe Manchin, Jay
Rockefeller and Tammy Baldwin.
Do you see a couple names in there other than the usual suspects you might recognize? Bernie
Sanders and Elizabeth Warren. Two of the Three Democrat Presidential candidates that claim to
be for the middle class and against the so called bankers! You might rethink your position on

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

their intentions! Anyone who gets any remote positive Media coverage is owned! That includes
Jeb Bush and most of clowns on the right as well as the left!
The Amnesty Bill passed through the Senate TWO years ago, in 2013 but has yet to be
introduced into the House. That is because they are waiting for TPP to be passed.
Sessions: Special Interest, Extremist Groups Wrote Immigration Bill
Senate Budget Committee ranking member Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-AL) claimed on
Breitbart News Sunday that the Gang of Eight U.S. Senators did not in fact write the
844-page immigration bill, but special interest groups like the U.S. Chamber of
Commerce, the SEIU, and AFL-CIO and extremist advocacy groups like the National
Council of La Raza actually wrote the legislation.
Sessions said. It was not written by the Gang of Eight themselves. But they have blessed
special interests to write and develop and approve each one of those provisions and
sections that impact their interest area."
As the Center for Immigration Studies has detailed, the bill creates a $150 million slush
fund for partisan leftwing groups. CIS analyst Jon Feere notes in a post that this slush
fund was inserted into the legislation by pro-amnesty lobbyists, those very same special
interest groups Sessions claims wrote the actual legislative text. A spokesman for Gang
of Eight member Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) defended the slush funds in a quote to Fox
News as a means to make sure that immigrants assimilate, and our proposal makes sure
that they do by mandating that they speak English, pass civic tests and have jobs.
They have decided it meets their goals but whos worrying about the working
Americans?" Sessions declared. "The ones who fight our wars and defend our country
and raise their children right making $20,000 to $45,000 who will have their wages pulled
down, who will find it harder to get a job, will find it harder for their children and
grandchildren to get jobs that pay a decent wage with a decent benefit?
Sessions said the bill is complicated and so difficult-to-read that it appears more like
gobbledygook than legislation.
Information released from the few who read whats in the Amnesty bill claim the Amnesty bill
allows up to 1 million foreign workers to enter the United States under some form of visa. Every
year! This means that a quarter of the workforce who are of working age will be represented by
foreigners. Of this one million, around 350,000 will be directly competing for middle class skilled
jobs which number could increase to 500,000 in the future.
Almost 4 million American students graduate from colleges and universities each year. These
4 million college students will now be competing with billions of foreigners who are willing to
work for slave wages. W-visas would allow up to an additional 200,000 workers into the country
within a few years and depending on other factors, could even be higher.
Farmers across the United States are allowed just over 50,000 H-2A visas annually which is
for individuals who work in the field of agriculture. The Amnesty bill allows that number to
increase to near 250,000 workers! Again this is annually and this does not factor in the amount of
current illegal immigrants who are already working on farms nor does it factor in future illegal
immigrations which we know will not stop. Nor does it factor in people just wanting to migrate
here through the legal immigration process.

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

Not including the current 11+ million illegal immigrants, 750,000 workers under non-agricultural
status are brought into the USA by companies of which a significant portion are allowed to apply
for green cards and citizenship. This group of non-agricultural visa workers accounts for around
350,000 jobs in the hotel and restaurant business. This amount also covers J-visas which account
for almost 200,000 workers, almost 60,000 H-2B workers and 25,000 workers who fill seasonal
jobs. The seasonal jobs are jobs kids used to work over summer break to save for the college year
to help make ends meet. There are also L-visas which allow companies to rotate just over 60,000
workers annually from overseas branches to the United States.
Then you have the H-1Bs visa which are STEM field visas. Corporate Congress will allow
300,000 foreigners into the United States each year. It will allow Corporations to fill 300,000
STEM field jobs annually. Barely 152,000 students in the USA graduate with a STEM degree
annually. These 152,000 graduates will have to compete with 300,000+ foreigners. What does that
to? It drives wages down. It ensures the ones who have student loans can never get ahead because
they will make less money and have a large student loan debt.
With Amnesty being given to 11+ million illegal immigrants plus the estimated 30+ million
family members plus the previously deported immigrants and all of their families plus all of these
visas, the 93 million Americans who have given up looking or the millions underemployed or not
employed full-time are DONE! There simply are not enough jobs!
And this is the goal of Globalism and the .001 percents agenda.
It will eventually put EVERYONE at or near minimum wage at some point and put 90% of the
country in a position where they depend on the State (government) and with that will come
USDA/Mexican consulates to immigrants: Dont worry, food stamps wont affect
citizenship chances
In one portion of the brochure, USDAs text asks, If I get on SNAP benefits, will I be a
public charge? The brochure then answers: No. You and your family can apply for
and receive SNAP benefits without hurting your chance of becoming U.S. citizens.
Ronald Reagan did not deport illegal immigrants either, he gave them amnesty. From Ronald
Reagan to Barack Obama, no president has built a real fence nor properly defended the borders.
Sure they deported and incarcerated illegals but not because they were or are trying to prevent
illegal immigrations.
DHS released another 30,000 criminal aliens onto streets
Federal immigration officers released another 30,000 immigrants with criminal records
last year, following the 36,000 it released in 2013, the government announced Wednesday
though it promised to take steps to cut down on the problem
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, the agency that handles detention and
removal of illegal immigrants, said it will no longer allow overcrowding to be the main
reason a dangerous illegal immigrant is released, and will require a top supervisor to
approve the cases of any serious criminals that officers want to release.

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and


Imagine, 66,000 criminal illegal immigrants running around. Not deported, RELEASED. Think
the Oligarchy or politicians need to worry about their safety? Overcrowding, really? And what is
going to become of criminal felons? Think they are going to attend college and become productive
in society? No, they are going to go out and commit more crime. They are going to kill, rape, and
traffic more people. So when that happens to someone in your family, remember, DHS did it, and
that Obama is in charge of DHS. Maybe one of them and their family members should reap the
3,700 illegal immigrant Threat Level 1 criminals released into U.S. by DHS
Most of the illegal immigrant criminals Homeland Security officials released from
custody last year were discretionary, meaning the department could have kept them in
detention but chose instead to let them onto the streets as their deportation cases moved
through the system, according to new numbers from Congress.
Some of those released were the worst of the worst more than 3,700 Threat Level 1
criminals, who are deemed the top priority for deportation, were still released out into the
community even as they waited for their immigration cases to be heard.
Dream Fund to start helping students who are illegal immigrants
Starting Thursday, students without legal permission to be in the country will be able to
apply for scholarships of up to $6,000 to help pay for tuition at Illinois colleges and
The Illinois DREAM Fund, a not-for-profit organization created under a state law aimed
at helping immigrants brought in illegally as children, has so far raised about $500,000
through private donations, the group said Friday.
121 Criminal Aliens Released By Obama Administration Have Been Charged With
Murder Since 2010
More than 100 immigrants whom the Obama administration released back into the community
went on to be charged with subsequent killings, according to government data released Monday
that raises more questions about whether immigration authorities are doing enough to detail
illegal immigrants awaiting deportation.
In one case, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement acknowledged that its agents didnt
find out about an illegal immigrants death threats and court injunctions against him which
should have put him back in detention until after the man was accused of murder.


White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

According to a March 2, 2015 ICE Weekly Departures and Detention Report obtained
by Center for Immigration Studies expert Jessica Vaughan and shared with Breitbart
News, there were 168,680 convicted criminal immigrants who had final orders of removal
but who remained at large in the U.S.
Another 179,018 convicted criminal immigrants with deportation cases pending also
remained at large.
While the vast majority were not in custody some were detained namely 6,220 criminal
immigrants facing final deportation orders and another 7,680 convicted criminal
immigrants with immigration cases pending.
In recent years there has been a focus on the number of annual criminal immigrant
In 2013 the Obama administration released 36,007 criminal immigrants who had nearly
88,000 convictions. Those convictions included 193 homicide convictions, 426 sexual
assault convictions, 303 kidnapping convictions, and 1,075 aggravated assault
In January, the Department of Homeland Security revealed in a 38-page document to
Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-IA) showing that of those criminals
released in 2013, 1,000 had gone on to commit additional crimes including, terroristic
threats, lewd acts with a minor, various types of assault, DUI, robbery, hit-and-run, gang
activity, rape, and child cruelty.
The Obama Administration claims that it is using prosecutorial discretion to prioritize
the removal of criminal aliens from this country. But this report shows the disturbing
truth: 1,000 undocumented aliens previously convicted of crimes who the Administration
released in 2013 have gone on to commit further crimes in our communities, Grassley
said in January.
In 2014 the administration released another 30,558 criminal immigrants, who had a total
of 79,059 convictions.
The convictions included in the 2014 releases included: 86 homicide convictions, 186
kidnapping convictions, 373 sexual assault convictions, 449 commercialized sexual
offenses, 1,194 battery convictions, 1,346 domestic violence convictions, and 13,636
When aliens released onto the streets go on to commit additional crimes yet could have
been placed in ICE custody, this Administration is responsible. From January 1, 2014 to
September 30, 2014, over 10,000 detainers were not honored, House Judiciary
Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte (R-VA) said in April. The recidivism rate for these
aliens was 29 percent. Innocent citizens and law enforcement officers could be injured,
maimed, or murdered due to a detainer not being issued or honored because of this
Administrations policies.
The Administration is responsible and will be held accountable, he added.
Often the administration has pointed to the Supreme Court decision in Zadvydas v. Davis
preventing indefinite detention of immigrants facing deportation, most often when the
immigrants home country will not take them back. However in recent months lawmakers
have chipped away at that response.


White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

In April the House Judiciary Committee revealed that of the 30,558 released criminal
immigrants in 2014 just 2,457 were released due to Zadvydas or about eight percent.
In May the Obama administration revealed to the Senate Judiciary Committee that
between 2010 and 2014, 121 convicted criminal immigrants with final orders of
deportation were never removed and now face murder charges.
Of these 121 individuals who were bonded out, 33 were released on a bond set by [The
Department of Justices Executive Office for Immigration Review] and 24 were released
pursuant to the Supreme Court decision in Zadvydas v. Davis, ICE revealed in a released
letter to Senate Judiciary Chairman Grassley.
Obviously most of the immigrants who come to the USA illegally are not all criminals but they
are disproportionately committing crime compared to that of US citizens by a wide margin.
Arresting and deporting x amount of illegals accomplishes a number of things of which very
few benefit Americans or the country. Privatized prison contracts require their prisons always
operate at 90 percent capacity. The more illegals flooding into the country, the higher the arrests,
the more people who go to prison. Unfortunately, instead of just arresting them for being illegal,
they have to commit a crime first.
This means that Corporate America and the politicians are putting your life at risk in order to
meet the 90 percent quota. They put you the American citizen at risk of being raped, robbed,
trafficked out of the country, or murdered at a much higher percentage than you would be with
American citizens. They put your community at risk because illegal immigrants are typically
affiliated with gangs who are responsible for the movement of drugs from town to town, city to
city and usually is accompanied with drug related shootings. Hence why a significant amount of
the shootings that happen in Chicago, Los Angeles, Philadelphia, Baltimore, Detroit and many
other cities do not make it into the mainstream Media! And if it did make it to the mainstream
Media, it was a blip on the screen. It did not get 24/7 coverage like the Ferguson or Baltimore got
with the police shootings in which ONE person was killed. There are estimated to be over 1 million
gang members of which a high percentage are from south of the border.
Youve hopefully caught onto the Medias agenda by now. Only mass shootings by White people
or White cops who shoot Black people make it into the 24/7 news category. Only those scenarios
are covered 24/7 by the Media with nothing but a racial overtone. You dont see 24/7 coverage
on the 50 Blacks shot and killed in Baltimore over Memorial Day Weekend, you dont see 24/7
news coverage of Back on White hate crime, knockout game victims, or flash mobs, and you dont
see 24/7 coverage on Black police officers shooting Blacks or Black on Black crime. It is a specific
demographic as the aggressor and a specific demographic as the victim. And you dont see Jesse
Jackson, Al Sharpton, the Department of Justice, or Obama unless its 100 percent White on Black.
No other scenario!
A reason for the White privilege movement!
High percentage of arrests also justifies the expansion of the prison industrial complex which
not only expands the shareholders wealth, but it also adds jobs to the economy via prison guards.
It makes it look like the politicians are creating jobs and doing their job in terms of public safety
when in fact it is designed to hide the problem. There are over 900,000 jobs in the USA that are


White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

affiliated with the Prison system. The states are left with the burden of paying for these prisons.
How do states raise money to fund programs?
With taxes!
Taxes YOU the MIDDLE CLASS will pay! Because Corporate America contributes very little
to state taxes because most of their workforce is stationed outside the USA.
A reason for the White privilege movement!
Immigration bill: John McCain says border surge isn't certain
We dont need 20,000 additional border patrol agents, McCain said Tuesday. But
what we do need is use of technology that has been developed where we can survey the
border more effectively.
Mexican Diplomat Says Obama Invited The Sinaloa Drug Cartel To Smuggle Tons
Of Drugs Into Chicago
Leaked emails from the private U.S. security firm Stratfor cite a Mexican diplomat who
says the U.S. government works with Mexican cartels to traffic drugs into the United
States and has sided with the Sinaloa cartel in an attempt to limit the violence in Mexico.
Most notably, the reports from MX1 line up with assertions by a Sinaloa cartel insider
that cartel boss Joaquin Guzman is a U.S. informant, the Sinaloa cartel was given carte
blanche to continue to smuggle tons of illicit drugs into Chicago, and Operation Fast and
Furious was part of an agreement to finance and arm the Sinaloa cartel in exchange for
information used to take down rival cartels.
In July a Mexican state government spokesman told Al Jazeera that the CIA and other
international security forces dont fight drug traffickers as much as try to manage the
drug trade. A mid-level Mexican official told Al Jazeera that based on discussions hes
had with U.S. officials working in Ciudad Jurez, the allegations were true.
GOP mega-donor backs immigration reform
Republican mega-bundler Paul Singer has quietly gotten involved in the fight for
immigration reform, making a six-figure donation to a group involved in marshaling
conservatives to support an overhaul of federal laws, POLITICO has learned.
Singer, the hedge fund billionaire who has become one of the Republican Partys most
prolific donors and bundlers over the past seven years, made the donation to the
National Immigration Forum. The group has been focusing, in part, on getting support
from the business community, faith leaders and law enforcement for the reform effort.

IRS Sent $46,378,040 in Refunds to 23,994 Unauthorized Aliens at 1 Atlanta


White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

The IRS sent 11,284 refunds worth a combined $2,164,976 to unauthorized alien workers
at a second Atlanta address; 3,608 worth $2,691,448 to a third; and 2,386 worth
$1,232,943 to a fourth.
Other locations on the IGs Top Ten list for singular addresses that were theoretically
used simultaneously by thousands of unauthorized alien workers, included an address in
Oxnard, Calif, where the IRS sent 2,507 refunds worth $10,395,874; an address in
Raleigh, North Carolina, where the IRS sent 2,408 refunds worth $7,284,212; an address
in Phoenix, Ariz., where the IRS sent 2,047 refunds worth $5,558,608; an address in Palm
Beach Gardens, Fla., where the IRS sent 1,972 refunds worth $2,256,302; an address in
San Jose, Calif., where the IRS sent 1,942 refunds worth $5,091,027; and an address in
Arvin, Calif., where the IRS sent 1,846 refunds worth $3,298,877.
IRS Sent $46 Million In Refunds To 'Unauthorized' Workers At One Atlanta
In what appears to be a significant oversight, the Internal Revenue Service sent a total of
$46,378,040 in refunds to "unauthorized" workers at one address in Atlanta, Ga.,
according to a report from the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration.
Brought to light last year by WTHR-TV Indianapolis, the IRS' $46 million in refunds
included 23,994 tax payouts sent to the particular property in 2011.
As the audit report discloses, the Atlanta address is one of several that received a high
number of refunds for Individual Taxpayer Identification Number (ITIN) tax returns.
ITINs are issued to those who are ineligible to obtain a Social Security number. However,
it seems, the application for these identification numbers is flawed.
Think there is something a bit questionable going on there? No doubt in my mind!
Immigration bill grants amnesty to employers of illegals; no prosecution for bogus
The debate is raging over whether the latest immigration bill is an amnesty for illegal
immigrants, but one part is clear: The legislation would forgive businesses that have
employed those immigrants illegally.
Employers who have allowed illegal immigrants to work off the books can come forward
safely and provide their work history without fear of prosecution, and businesses that
knowingly employed someone using a bogus or stolen Social Security number likewise
would get a pass, according to an analysis of the bill by the Center for Immigration
Studies, a think tank that wants a crackdown on immigration.
Hey, no problem, you didnt hire American citizens. We forgive you, its ok to break the law if you
are big business. Guess who will be the biggest benefactor of Amnesty. Places like Wal-Mart!


White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

1,500 Page Immigration Bill to Drop One Day Before Only Hearing?
A bipartisan group of senators plans to introduce its long-awaited immigration bill on
Tuesday, Senate sources confirmed to ABC News, Jim Avila and Jordan Fabian wrote
on Friday. Four Democrats and four Republicans, known as the Gang of Eight,
wrapped up months of hard-fought negotiations this week and will put forth a bill that
includes a pathway to citizenship for many of the 11 million undocumented immigrants
living in the U.S.
If the Senators actually do wait until Tuesday
to roll out their lengthy proposed overhaul of
the U.S. immigration system, that will give
members of the Senate Judiciary Committee
less than a full day to read it before the only
Senate hearing on the topic. Despite ardent
pleas from Senate conservatives, including
ranking Senate Judiciary Committee member
Sen. Chuck Grassley, the committees
chairman, Sen. Pat Leahy, has only agreed to
one hearing on the legislation. Gang of Eight
member Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) 80% has said he supports multiple hearings and an
open and transparent immigration reform process, but his actions do not necessarily back
his words. He has not pushed Leahy to force multiple hearings; he appears content with
the single hearing Leahy has scheduled on the issue and now appears to be backing down
from his demand for multiple hearings.
Look at that group of lying, thieving, murdering scumbags laughing it up. They know they are
f****** the country over but they dont care because their masters will take care of them!
Changes to How the U.S. Economy is Measured Roll Out July 31
The art of measuring the size of the economy just got a new box of crayons.
The Bureau of Economic Analysis announced last week it would be changing the
guidelines with which it calculates Gross Domestic Product, more familiarly known as
the GDP, the standard by which the size and growth of the economy is measured.
The change comes after more than five years of economic stagnation that, despite frequent
claims of a strengthening recovery, have seen high unemployment and extremely slight
growth in the size of the economy.
GDP is calculated by adding up the total amount of private consumption, investment,
government spending, and net exports. The new changes, which will include definitional
changes to expand what is counted in GDP, are expected to add 3 percent to the GDP
report, while not changing the actual output of the economy.


White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

GDP Revisions Make Recovery Look Better, Recession Not as Bad
The current recovery, which followed that recession, was revised to show stronger growth
than previously thought, though it is still the weakest recovery since World War II. The
economy expanded at an average annual rate of 2.3% between the second quarter of 2009
and the fourth quarter of 2012, compared with a previously published 2.1% pace.
The revisions come as part of a comprehensive overhaul of gross domestic product data
dating from 1929 through the end of 2012. The government revised the figures to include
new measures and data it says better captures the U.S. economy.
One of the biggest changes is how the agency measures what it calls the knowledge
economy through investments in research and development and entertainment and the
arts. Previously, that spending was included as intermediate components during the
production of other goods or services, but now they will be measured as fixed assets and
reflect their ongoing contributions.
Including these intangible assets will boost the countrys overall growth level, but do not
significantly change growth rates. For example, research and development and
entertainment added $471 billion to the revised $16.2 trillion overall economy.
So what this really means is they are manipulating it so you cant see how shitty things are! But,
I guarantee, 50 million liberals will see in on CNN and that is all they need. Media tells them the
GDP is good and Obama is the greatest thing ever, it must be so. Because all of them are expert
economists! Never mind most of them are unemployed or in low income jobs, they are armchair
PHDs in Economics!
The truth is whatever people will believe Roger Ailes
Unfortunately Roger is correct. If people see it on Facebook or in the mainstream Media, or if
Barack Obama speaks about it, it now becomes truth. People are so easy to fool and that is why
they are winning. People have no concept of the level of deceit that is taking place. All pinning
their hopes and dreams on Hope and Change. On being handed the keys to the kingdom. And it
will NEVER happen.

Immigration Reform 'Will Be Good for the Middle Class'

If there is a candidate for the BS award, the Whitehouses Immigration Reform 'Will Be
Good for the Middle Class' definitely has its place near the top. Not only is this a lie, its on the
Whitehouse website. Or was at the time of this writing!
The video talks about how the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) feels that immigration
reform will fix the economy. Of course, the CBO is directed by Congress and the President, would
you expect anything negative?
The bill is over 1,500 pages and just like ObamaCare, very few have even read it. Corporate
lawyers, special interest groups, and lobbyists wrote this bill! Just like they did the Affordable
Care Act! You already read that they plan to insource half the planet which will without a doubt

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

destroy the country. Every major bill that passes chips away at the Constitution, there is no reason
to believe this bill will be any different.
1. If immigration reform were passed this year it could help boost our nations Gross Domestic
Product (GDP) by more than 5 percent to $1.4 trillion by 2033.
Statistics prove that as the United States GDP has increased, so have unemployment rates, debt,
national deficit, health issues, and an overall decline in standard of living. The ONLY reason why
the GDP goes up is because of the money spent on healthcare, college, and oil. ObamaCare will
boost up big Pharma profits by 100s of billions and that in turn will boost the GDP.
Medical/healthcare costs the U.S. trillions. They arent lying about the GDP, but they are selling
it as the GDP going up being something healthy and good for the economy.
All it means is more money will be spent on healthcare!
What does 2033 have to do with 2014?
Inflation, if it increases as it has the last 20 years along with declines in income, will bankrupt 90
percent of the country by 2033. See if you notice a problem with the median household incomes!

Median Household Income

(Inflation adjusted)



The Median household income in 2012 is the same it was in 1996. Is the cost of meat, eggs, dairy,
poultry, rent, mortgage, gasoline, electric, medical insurance the same in 2015 as 1996? NOT
even close!

Cost of a new home

Cost of a gallon of regular gas
Cost of a dozen eggs



If you bought a $20,000 automobile in 1994 that same vehicle will cost $57,000 in 2033 assuming
inflation rates remain constant which will not be the case because the deficit continues to expand
which is devaluing the dollar. And incomes are not going up either. The US Government claims
inflation is around 2.5% yet Economists claim its between 5-10%.


White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

If You Want To Know the Real Rate of Inflation, Don't Bother With the CPI
Common sense tells us the Consumer Price Index is not an adequate measure of inflation.
For the second year in a row the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPIU) remained under 2 percent. On average, consumer prices increased 1.5 percent,
according to the government. However, the government has incentives to keep this
statistic as low as possible. In fact, the CPI doesnt even measure inflation, rather a range
of consumer spending behaviors. The CPI is perhaps one of the most important
government statistics because it affects a number of public programs and is used as a
benchmark to set public policy. But its accuracy is questionable, especially when
compared with other agencys inflation measures.
Why does the government want low inflation numbers?
The CPI is tied to the incomes of about 80 million Americans, specifically: Social
Security beneficiaries, food stamp recipients, military and federal Civil Service retirees
and survivors, and children on school lunch programs. The higher the CPI, the more
money the government needs to spend on these income payments to keep pace with the
cost of living. However, this same government is about $17 trillion in debt. If the CPI is
low, the less money the government needs to spend on cost of living adjustments,
something seniors are astutely aware of.
The government has a few resources at its disposal to manipulate the CPI. First, the
Bureau of Labor Statistics operates under a veil of secrecy. The raw data used to calculate
the CPI is not available to the public. When I asked why, I was told so companies cant
compare prices. This makes very little sense because companies can easily compare
prices with data openly available on the internet. It also makes it impossible to audit their
findings. Additionally, over the past 30 years, the government has changed the way it
calculates inflation more than 20 times. These methodological improvements to the CPI
are said to give a more accurate measure of consumer prices. However, these changes
could also be a convenient way to include or exclude certain products that give favorably
low results, but theres no way to know, given the lack of transparency.
So how is the CPI calculated?
Although this is not a transparent process, the BLS gives some insight on their website as
to how it calculates the CPI. The economic assistants track about 80,000 consumer
products each month known as the Market Basket of Goods. However,
If the selected item is no longer available, or if there have been changes in the quality or
quantity (for example, eggs sold in packages of ten when they previously were sold by
the dozen) of the good or service since the last time prices were collected, the economic
assistant selects a new item or records the quality change in the current item.
This data is then plugged into a formula along with other factors including census
information and consumer spending patterns. In other words, the CPI doesnt measure
changes in consumer prices, rather it measures the cost-of-living. Further, the government
makes the assumption that consumer spending habits change as economic conditions
change, including rising prices. So if prices rise and consumers substitute products, the
CPI formula could hold a bias that doesnt report rising prices. Not a very accurate way
to measure inflation.
The CPI doesnt even meet the governments definition of inflation
The Bureau of Labor Statistics defines inflation as a process of continuously rising prices
or equivalently, of a continuously falling value of money.

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and


As I outlined above, the CPI is not a measurement of rising prices, rather it tracks
consumer spending patterns that change as prices change. The CPI doesnt even touch
the falling value of money. If it did the CPI would look much different
Use that example with everything. Cost of food, shelter, and gasoline. If everyones salaries are
declining, minimum wage is not going up, and inflation is going up, it means everyone will get
poorer. Inflation is what they call a hidden tax on the lower and middle classes!
How about we factor in the national deficit! Its growing by $1 trillion a year. Never mind the
stat about it shrinking in 2014. That isnt because of a controlled budget or spending, it is because
they took in 100s of BILLIONS more in taxes because of ObamaCare. Future projections put us
right back at a $1 trillion dollar plus deficit each year. So by 2033, our national deficit could
conceivably be $37 trillion and this does not account for the estimated additional $6 trillion
Amnesty is expected to cost. The interest payment on $37 trillion will be over $1.5 trillion a year.
The dollar is becoming useless at $18.2 trillion; most of the world is trying to dump the U.S. dollar
as the worlds currency, what can we expect when it doubles? It will NEVER get to that point. A
collapse will happen long before that!
They constantly use GDP yet as the GDP has increased so have poverty and the national deficit.
So has the decline in living conditions and the overall welfare of the average American. ALL
Americans minus the .001 percent who are doing just fine!
Is it sinking in yet?
With healthcare being the prime source of revenue in the country, NOT middle class
manufacturing and production jobs, or small businesses and with tariffs removed, the dollar
amount of the GDP is no longer meaningful like it was prior to Globalization. The GDP as a means
of measuring a nations wealth is useless but you can measure its health using the GDP. As the
GDP increases so does unemployment, sickness, misery and DEBT.
Lets attempt show how the GDP has nothing to do with the nations health.
(Number represents billions and trillions)
1984 1988 1992 1996 2000 2004 2008 2012
7.4T 8.6T 9.4T 10.7T 12.7T 13.9T 14.6T 5.5T

22.5 trillion

Healthcare Spending by Year

(Doubled since 2000)
1984 1988 1992 1996 2000
425B 540B 808B 1.04T 1.4T


Healthcare costs to GDP

1984 1988 1992 1996




2008 2012
2.4T 2.8T

16 trillion





White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

9.0% 10.2% 12% 13.6% 13.8% 16.0% 16.8% 18.1%


Want to know why the GDP is going to go up with 11+ million illegal immigrants?
U.S. Healthcare Hits $3 Trillion

Family health care costs to exceed $20,000 this year
The cost to cover the typical family of four under an employer plan is expected to top
$20,000 on health care this year, up more than 7% from last year, according to early
projections by independent actuarial and health care consulting firm Milliman Inc. In
2002, the cost was just $9,235, the firm said
Annual Healthcare Costs For Family of 4 Now At $22,030

Of the $22,030 healthcare cost for a family of four, the employer pays about $12,886 in
employer subsidy while the employee pays the remaining $9,144, which is a combination

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

of $5,544 in payroll deductions and $3,600 in employee out-of-pocket costs. For
employees, this represents a cost increase of 6.5% over last years total employee cost of
Annual Healthcare Cost For Family Of Four Now At $24,671
Earlier today, the actuarial firm of Milliman, Inc. released their annual Medical Index for
2015 an index that theyve calculated and published since 2001. The Milliman Medical
Index (MMI) is the total annual cost of healthcare as estimated by Milliman for a typical
family of four with employer-provided PPO insurance coverage.
According to Milliman, this years MMI is $24,671 and represents a $1,456 (6.3%)
increase from last years MMI of $23,215.
But ObamaCare was about healthcare right? Just had to get the IRS involved. Didnt do that
for Medicare or Medicaid did they. But you MUST sign up or pay the penalty. You know
why there is a penalty? Because for anyone who is actually EMPLOYED and making more
than minimum wage, they dont qualify for subsides so they CANT afford the not so
Affordable Healthcare Act insurance. Oh but Obama is so great. ObamaCare is so good,
because CNN and MSNBC told me so!
CHART SHOCK: The REAL Inflation Rate Is 10%
If the CPI were still calculated as it was in the 1980s under Paul Volcker, it would show
a very different picture of inflation than what is promulgated by Chairman Bernanke.
The CPI on the Alternate Data Series tab here reflects the CPI as if it were calculated
using the methodologies in place in 1980. In general terms, methodological shifts in
government reporting have depressed reported inflation, moving the concept of the CPI
away from being a measure of the cost of living needed to maintain a constant standard
of living. Further definition is provided in our CPI Glossary.
Constantly manipulating everything to hide how terrible the economy is. Cant hide the price of
food and water though. Cant hide the cost of insurance and everything else. Government can say
its 0 percent but if the price of anything goes up, it means there is inflation!
Annual Healthcare Expenditure (Per Household)




$8,402 70

The federal government actually counts money borrowed toward the GDP. So when the
government borrows $1 trillion dollars, it adds that to the GDP. This is another reason why they
claim the GDP will go up with Amnesty. Because it will. Because that infusion of 10s of millions
of people will force the government to have to borrow another 500 billion to a trillion dollars

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

annually to support this influx of people. That will add 500 billion to a trillion to the GDP annually.
It will lead to more interest paid on the national debt which will devalue the USD which will lead
to an increase in inflation and that will force the cost of everything to go up. The only thing that
wont go up though, is your paycheck! This is why they arent raising interest rates yet. If they
did that, inflation would expand so high it would literally make it impossible for the government
to fund entitlement programs.
Those who think the stock market is booming, it isnt. Most of the corporate structure is buying
back their stock. In 2013, corporations were responsible for the purchase of half of a trillion in
stock. People arent buying stock, corporations are!


National Deficit

Interest paid

Nominal GDP (in billions)



$ 9,660,000,000,000.00
$ 9,089,000,000,000.00
$ 8,608,000,000,000.00
$ 8,100,000,000,000.00
$ 7,664,000,000,000.00
$ 7,308,000,000,000.00
$ 6,878,000,000,000.00
$ 6,539,000,000,000.00
$ 6,174,000,000,000.00
$ 5,979,000,000,000.00
$ 5,657,000,000,000.00
$ 5,252,000,000,000.00

Do you see anything a bit odd with the chart below? As the GDP goes up, so does the national
deficit. And so do the interest payments to the .001 percent. As a reminder, because I cant
emphasize this enough, interest decreases the strength of the dollar which is what inflation is.


White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

A bit of historic poverty!

All People














2013 Poverty Stats



The War on Poverty After 50 Years

In his January 1964 State of the Union address, President Lyndon Johnson proclaimed, This
administration today, here and now, declares unconditional war on poverty in America. In the
50 years since that time, U.S. taxpayers have spent over $22 trillion on anti-poverty programs.
Adjusted for inflation, this spending (which does not include Social Security or Medicare) is
three times the cost of all U.S. military wars since the American Revolution. Yet progress against

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

poverty, as measured by the U.S. Census Bureau, has been minimal, and in terms of President
Johnsons main goal of reducing the causes rather than the mere consequences of poverty,
the War on Poverty has failed completely. In fact, a significant portion of the population is now
less capable of self-sufficiency than it was when the War on Poverty began.
This week, the U.S. Census Bureau is scheduled to release its annual poverty report. The report
will be notable because this year marks the 50th anniversary of the launch of President Lyndon
Johnsons War on Poverty. In his January 1964 State of the Union address, Johnson proclaimed,
This administration today, here and now, declares unconditional war on poverty in America.
Since that time, U.S. taxpayers have spent over $22 trillion on anti-poverty programs (in constant
2012 dollars). Adjusted for inflation, this spending (which does not include Social Security or
Medicare) is three times the cost of all military wars in U.S. history since the American Revolution.
Despite this mountain of spending, progress against poverty, at least as measured by the
government, has been minimal.

The WelfarePoverty Paradox

This week, the Census Bureau will most likely report that the poverty rate last year was about 14
percent, essentially the same rate as in 1967, three years after the War on Poverty was announced.
As Chart 1 shows, according to the Census, there has been no net progress in reducing poverty
since the mid to late 1960s. Since that time, the poverty rate has undulated slowly, falling by two
to three percentage points during good economic times and rising by a similar amount when the

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

economy slows. Overall, the trajectory of official poverty for the past 45 years has been flat or
slightly upward.
The static nature of poverty is especially surprising because (as Chart 1 also shows) poverty fell
dramatically during the period before the War on Poverty began. In 1950, the poverty rate was 32.2
percent. By 1965 (the first year during which any War on Poverty programs began to operate), the
rate had been cut nearly in half to 17.3 percent.
The unchanging poverty rate for the past 45 years is perplexing because anti-poverty or welfare
spending during that period has simply exploded. As Chart 2 shows, means-tested welfare
spending has soared since the start of the War on Poverty. In fiscal year 2013, the federal
government ran over 80 means-tested welfare programs that provided cash, food, housing, medical
care, and targeted social services to poor and low-income Americans.

Overall, 100 million individualsnearly one in three Americansreceived benefits from at least
one of these programs. Federal and state governments spent $943 billion in 2013 on these programs
at an average cost of $9,000 per recipient. (Again, Social Security and Medicare are not included
in the totals.)
Today, government spends 16 times more, adjusting for inflation, on means-tested welfare or antipoverty programs than it did when the War on Poverty started. But as welfare spending soared, the
decline in poverty came to a grinding halt. As Chart 2 shows, the more the government spent, the
less progress against poverty was made.

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

How can this paradox be explained? How can government spend $9,000 per recipient and have no
apparent impact on poverty? The answer is that it cant.
The conundrum of massive anti-poverty spending and unchanging poverty rates has a simple
explanation. The Census Bureau counts a family as poor if its income falls below specific
thresholds, but in counting income, the Census omits nearly all of government means-tested
spending on the poor. In effect, it ignores almost the entire welfare state when it calculates poverty.
This neat bureaucratic ploy ensured that welfare programs could grow infinitely while poverty
remained unchanged.
Living Conditions of the Poor in America
Consumption by Poor Families. Since the Census Bureau dramatically undercounts the actual
incomes of the poor, it should be no surprise to find that the U.S. Department of Labor routinely
reports that poor families spend $2.40 for every $1.00 of their reported income. If public housing
benefits are added to the tally, the ratio of consumption to income rises to $2.60 for every $1.00.
In other words, the income figures that the Census Bureau uses to calculate poverty dramatically
undercount the economic resources available to lower-income households.
Amenities. Because the official Census poverty report undercounts welfare income, it fails to
provide meaningful information about the actual living conditions of less affluent Americans. The
governments own data show that the actual living conditions of the more than 45 million people
deemed poor by the Census Bureau differ greatly from popular conceptions of poverty. Consider
these facts taken from various government reports:

Eighty percent of poor households have air conditioning. By contrast, at the beginning of
the War on Poverty, only about 12 percent of the entire U.S. population enjoyed air
Nearly three-quarters have a car or truck; 31 percent have two or more cars or trucks.
Nearly two-thirds have cable or satellite television.
Two-thirds have at least one DVD player, and a quarter have two or more.
Half have a personal computer; one in seven has two or more computers.
More than half of poor families with children have a video game system such as an Xbox
or PlayStation.
Forty-three percent have Internet access.
Forty percent have a wide-screen plasma or LCD TV.
A quarter have a digital video recorder system such as a TIVO.
Ninety-two percent of poor households have a microwave.

For decades, the living conditions of the poor have steadily improved. Consumer items that were
luxuries or significant purchases for the middle class a few decades ago have become
commonplace in poor households. In part, this is caused by a normal downward price trend
following the introduction of a new product. Initially, new products tend to be expensive and
available only to the affluent. Over time, prices fall sharply, and the product becomes widely
prevalent throughout the population, including poor households. This is a general sign of desirable
economic progress.
Liberals use the declining relative prices of many amenities to argue that even though poor
households have air conditioning, computers, cable TV, and wide-screen TVs, they still suffer from


White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

substantial material deprivation in basic needs such as food and housing. Here again, the data tell
a different story.
Poverty, Nutrition, and Hunger. Despite impressions to the contrary, most of the poor do not
experience undernutrition, hunger, or food shortages. Information on these topics is collected by
the household food security survey of the U.S. Department of Agriculture. The USDA survey
shows that in 2009:

Ninety-six percent of poor parents stated that their children were never hungry at any time
during the year because they could not afford food.
Some 83 percent of poor families reported that they had enough food to eat.
Some 82 percent of poor adults reported that they were never hungry at any time in the
prior year due to lack of money to buy food.
As a group, Americas poor are far from being chronically undernourished. The average
consumption of protein, vitamins, and minerals is virtually the same for poor and middleclass children and in most cases is well above recommended norms. Poor children actually
consume more meat than do higher-income children and have average protein intakes 100
percent above recommended levels.
Most poor children today are, in fact, supernourished and grow up to be, on average, one
inch taller and 10 pounds heavier than the GIs who stormed the beaches of Normandy in
World War II.

Housing and Poverty. TV newscasts about poverty in America generally depict the poor as
homeless or as residing in dilapidated living conditions. While some families do experience such
severe conditions, they are far from typical of the population defined as poor by the Census Bureau.
The actual housing conditions of poor families are very different.

Over the course of a year, only 4 percent of poor persons become temporarily homeless.
At a single point in time, one in 70 poor persons is homeless.
Only 9.5 percent of the poor live in mobile homes or trailers; 49.5 percent live in separate
single-family houses or townhouses, and 40 percent live in apartments.
Forty-two percent of all poor households actually own their own homes. The average home
owned by persons classified as poor by the Census Bureau is a three-bedroom house with
one-and-a-half baths, a garage, and a porch or patio.
Only 7 percent of poor households are overcrowded. More than two-thirds have more than
two rooms per person.
The average poor American has more living space than the average individual living in
Sweden, France, Germany, or the United Kingdom. (These comparisons are to the average
citizens in foreign countries, not to those classified as poor.)
The vast majority of the homes or apartments of the poor are in good repair and without
significant defects.

By his own report, the average poor person had sufficient funds to meet all essential needs and
was able to obtain medical care for his family throughout the year whenever needed.
Of course, poor Americans do not live in the lap of luxury. The poor clearly struggle to make ends
meet, but they are generally struggling to pay for cable TV, air conditioning, and a car, as well as
food for the table. The average poor person is far from affluent, but his lifestyle is equally far from

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

the images of stark deprivation purveyed by advocacy groups and the mainstream media. The
challenges go much deeper than a lack of material resources.
Was the War on Poverty a Success?
Do the higher living standards of the poor mean that the War on Poverty has been successful? The
answer is no, for two reasons. First, the incomes and living standards of less affluent Americans
were rising rapidly well before the War on Poverty began. (See Charts 1 and 2.)
Second, and more important, to assess the War on Poverty, we must understand President Johnsons
actual goal when he launched it. The original goal of the War on Poverty was not to prop up living
standards artificially through an ever-expanding welfare state. Instead, Johnson declared that his
war would strike at the causes, not just the consequences of poverty. He added, Our aim is not
only to relieve the symptom of poverty, but to cure it and, above all, to prevent it.
In other words, President Johnson was not proposing a massive system of ever-increasing welfare
benefits, doled out to an ever-enlarging population of beneficiaries. His proclaimed goal was not
a massive new system of government handouts but an increase in self-sufficiency: a new
generation capable of supporting themselves out of poverty without government handouts.
LBJ actually planned to reduce, not increase, welfare dependence. He declared, We want to give
the forgotten fifth of our people opportunity not doles. He claimed that his war would enable the
nation to make important reductions in future welfare spending: The goal of the War on Poverty,
he stated, would be making taxpayers out of taxeaters. Because he viewed the War on Poverty
as a means to increase self-support, Johnson proclaimed that it would be an investment that
would return its cost manifold to the entire economy.
Measuring Self-Sufficiency
How has the War on Poverty fared with respect to President Johnsons paramount goal of
promoting self-sufficiency? What return have the taxpayers reaped from their $22 trillion
investment? Paradoxically, the answers to these questions are best provided by the Census
Bureaus official poverty statistics.
As noted, Census poverty figures are misleading as a measure of actual living conditions because
they exclude nearly all welfare assistance. They do, however, provide a fairly accurate measure of
a familys wages and earnings. This means that the official Census poverty figures are, in fact,
a good measure of President Johnsons original goal of promoting self-sufficiency: the ability of
a family to sustain itself above the poverty level through its own work and investment without
reliance on welfare aid.


White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and


Chart 3 repeats the official Census poverty figures from Chart 1 but relabels them more
accurately as a self-sufficiency index. The story told by the chart is striking.
In the decade and a half before the start of the War on Poverty, low-income Americans experienced
dramatic improvements in self-sufficiency. The share of Americans who lacked self-sufficiency
was cut nearly in half, falling from 32.2 percent in 1950 to 17.3 percent in 1965.
During the first six years after Johnson announced the War on Poverty (1965 to 1970), selfsufficiency continued to improve steadily. New government programs were initiated. Means-tested
welfare spending increased sharply from $57 billion in 1964 to $141 billion (measured in constant
2012 dollars).
Some authors suggest that the continuing decline in official poverty from 1965 to 1970
demonstrates the initial success of the War on Poverty, but over 90 percent of the increased
spending during this period was in the form of non-cash benefits that the Census does not count
for purposes of measuring poverty. It is therefore impossible for the expansion of means-tested
welfare to have directly produced the large decline in official poverty that occurred during this
Programs that in theory could have reduced poverty indirectly by raising wages and employment
were regarded as largely ineffective and were limited in scope. For example, in the late 1960s, only
300,000 participants per year were enrolled in Job Corps and related training programs.
Thus, it is implausible to suggest that the decline in official poverty between 1965 and 1970 was
due substantially to the direct or indirect effects of War on Poverty programs. Rather, official

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

poverty declined and self-sufficiency improved for the same general reason that these
improvements occurred before 1965: a steady rise of wages and education levels.
Unfortunately, the situation changed in the early 1970s. The steady improvement in selfsufficiency slowed and then came to a halt. For the next four decades, self-sufficiency has remained
stagnant or has slightly worsened.
The big picture is clear: For 20 years, from 1950 to 1970, self-sufficiency (and official poverty)
improved dramatically. In the next four decades, there was no progress at all; the self-sufficiency
rate remained essentially static. In terms of President Johnsons main goal of reducing the causes
rather than the mere consequences of poverty, the War on Poverty has failed completely, despite
$22 trillion in spending. In fact, a significant portion of the population is now less capable of selfsufficiency than it was when the War on Poverty began.


White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

What Went Wrong?
The lack of progress in self-sufficiency for the past four decades is stunning. Many factors have
contributed to this problem. For example, high school graduation rates, after increasing rapidly
throughout the 20th century, largely plateaued after 1970. Broad economic factors also played a
role, especially the slowdown in wage growth among low-skilled male workers since 1973. On the
other hand, employment and wages among women increased, and this should have led to increased
Although President Johnson intended the War on Poverty to increase Americans capacity for selfsupport, exactly the opposite has occurred. The vast expansion of the welfare state has dramatically
weakened the capacity for self-sufficiency among many Americans by eroding the work ethic and
undermining family structure.
When Johnson launched the War on Poverty, 7 percent of American children were born outside of
marriage. Today, the number is over 40 percent. (See Chart 4.) As the welfare state expanded,
marriage stagnated and single parenthood soared.


White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and


As Chart 5 shows, there has been no significant increase in the number of married-couple families
with children (both poor and non-poor) in the U.S. since 1965. By contrast, the number of singleparent families with children has skyrocketed by nearly 10 million, rising from 3.3 million such
families in 1965 to 13.2 million in 2012. Since single-parent families are roughly four times more
likely than married-couple families to lack self-sufficiency (and to be officially poor), this
unravelling of family structure has exerted a powerful downward pull against self-sufficiency and
substantially boosted the official child poverty rate.
Since the beginning of the War on Poverty, the absolute number of married-couple families with
children in official poverty has declined, but as Chart 6 shows, the number of single-parent families
in official poverty (or lacking self-sufficiency) has more than tripled, increasing from 1.6 million
in 1965 to 4.8 million today. When the War on Poverty began, 36 percent of poor families with
children were headed by single parents; today, the figure is 68 percent.

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

The War on Poverty crippled marriage in low-income communities. As means-tested benefits were
expanded, welfare began to serve as a substitute for a husband in the home, eroding marriage
among lower-income Americans. In addition, the welfare system actively penalized low-income
couples who did marry by eliminating or substantially reducing benefits. As husbands left the
home, the need for more welfare to support single mothers increased. The War on Poverty created
a destructive feedback loop: Welfare promoted the decline of marriage, which generated the need
for more welfare.
Today, unwed childbearing and the resulting growth of single-parent homes is the most important
cause of official child poverty. If poor women who give birth outside of marriage were married to
the fathers of their children, two-thirds would immediately be lifted out of official poverty and into
The welfare state has also reduced self-sufficiency by providing economic rewards to able-bodied
adults who do not work or who work comparatively little. The low level of parental work is a major
cause of official child poverty and the lack of self-sufficiency. Even in good economic times, the
median poor family with children has only 1000 hours of parental work per year. This is the
equivalent of one adult working 20 hours per week. If the amount of work performed in poor
families with children was increased to the equivalent of one adult working full-time through the
year, the poverty rate among these families would drop by two-thirds.

But you keep believing the Republicans and Democrats are two different parties, that Obama cares
about you, and that the economy is getting better. You will believe what the Media tells you to
believe! Because you are a zombie who cant think for themselves!


White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and


The cost of healthcare is eating away at middle class families and robbing them of wealth just as
inflation is. That is why healthcare is subsidized. It is taken from the middle class and given to the
poor. It is not taken from the wealthy. The wealthy profit on the other end of the transaction.
Especially by not having to pay for healthcare on its employees! The wealthy are NOT taxed on
social security, ObamaCare/Medicare on most of their income. But the middle class is taxed 100%
on it.
In terms of illegal immigrants and the governments pitch on how they will help the economy,
how many entrepreneurs will be produced out of 50 million people granted Amnesty, of which
roughly 20 million will be of working age? If there are so many entrepreneurs in this group, why
arent they in their own country starting a business? If all these illegal immigrants are going to
help the US economy, why arent they helping the countrys economy they are illegally
immigrating from?
The system is not broken, its corrupt! It is why college grads even in the STEM field are
having a harder time finding work and for quality salaries. To say that bringing in 50 million people
will boost the economy is nothing but a lie. The filling of quality jobs to include STEM jobs will
be masked by the H-1B visa programs, not because of the current millions of immigrants currently
residing here illegally or their family members.
2. Immigration Reform will make it easier for entrepreneurs to come here and start businesses
creating good jobs for American workers.
Most of the major companies in the United States outsource so even the next invention or
technology like another Microsoft or Dell will not translate into American jobs. These companies
outsource a significant amount of their labor force. Anything that has to do with manufacturing
or production will be outsourced. And small businesses are being attacked by the bankers and
Congress with high tax rates and mandated medical costs.
All of you who think you pay X amount of taxes are only looking at their W-2. You dont
realize the amount of taxes you pay every time you go shopping, every time you go out to eat,
every time you fill up your car with gas. You dont realize the taxes that are in your utility bill,
cable bill, and cell phone bill. Plus interest payments and inflation. Most people are paying a
good 70% of their income in taxes. And make no mistake about interest payments and inflation,
they are a tax! The .001 percent dont pay interest because they can pay cash for almost anything
they want. And inflation does not impact them in the least bit. They dont live check to check. It
may be an invisible tax to most of us but to them, its just invisible!
Obamacare Tax Aimed At 'Cadillac Plans' Will Hurt Ordinary Workers: Report
The Affordable Care Act includes a tax on high-cost insurance plans thats both a funding
mechanism for the law and meant to encourage patients with a menu of generous health
benefits to choose only necessary services. But the tax could wind up hurting workers
who pay premium dollars for not-so-premium health plans, according to a new report
from the left-leaning think tank the Economic Policy Institute.
[The tax] was sold as being on 'Cadillac Coverage.' The idea was that there were some
people out there that are getting thousands and thousands of dollars worth health
insurance premiums, said Elise Gould, the director of health policy research at EPI and


White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

the author of the report. But the reality is that health insurance premiums can be
expensive for many different reasons, not just because they have generous coverage.
The tax kicks in once an employer-sponsored plan is valued at over $10,200 for an
individual and 27,500 for a family, according to The Washington Post. The employer
pays a 40 percent tax on the difference between the threshold and the value of the plan.
The tax on high-cost plans is the largest long-term tax increase in the law, according to
WaPo's Ezra Klein. It takes effect in 2018 and aims to tax unusually expensive,
employer-provided health insurance plans,
How many of the businesses are going to be businesses that provide middle class jobs? VERY
FEW! Restaurants and landscaping or service industry jobs provide minimum wage jobs. That
means that every employee will require subsidies such ObamaCare or Medicaid which will cost
each state a fortune. That will put the states at even more of a deficit, force the government to have
to borrow and that in turn creates increased taxes that the middle class has to pay.
3. Reform will make it easier for highly skilled immigrants to get educated in U.S. universities to
work right here in America developing new technologies and innovative processes that make our
economy more productive and more competitive and a highly skilled workforce the more
productive an economy increases the rate of return for business and companies that invest in the
United States of America and that leads to more investments in the future.
There is a reason why most of the individuals illegally migrating into the USA are doing so,
illegally. They have no skills! No education! And most dont even speak the language or try to.
How do you remove a nations identity?
Remove the language. Create language barriers!
We already have 100 million people not in the workforce, many of which have a college
education in the STEM field. What possible contribution can 50 million people who have NO
education or skills provide to corporate America whose major labor force isnt even in the United
States? How many STEM jobs do you think people with no skills sneaking across the border will
There are NO JOBS! Over 100 million people NOT in the workforce now!
Seventy percent of the workforce makes minimum wage, because that is all that is left in the
country. MINIMUM WAGE JOBS! But adding another 50 million will somehow make 10s of
millions of jobs materialize out of thing air right? Middle class jobs right? Its a joke, and the joke
is on you! And notice how they say invest? That means money is involved which means bankers
and Congress Inc. are banking on profiting!
According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, in 2013 there were around 1.532 million hourly
workers who earned the minimum salary set by the federal government. That minimum is $7.25
an hour. Another 1.8 million people earned less than the federal minimum because they fell under
one of exemption industries such as tipped employees, full-time students, and certain disabled
workers totaling 3.3 million hourly workers who fall below the federal minimum. There are near
76 million hourly employees in the United States so the group making minimum wage or less than
minimum wage is just over 4% of the workforce. Over 500,000 of these people are college

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

Do you wonder why the unemployment for White people is so low and why the Welfare and
unemployment rate is higher for minorities? Around 77 percent of the minimum wage jobs are
being filled by White people. Service industry jobs! Not manufacturing or production, service
industry! Nearly 50% of these jobs are in the food preparation industry and close to 15% are in
the sales field.
One more reason for the White privilege movement!
Student loan rates double after Congress fails on fix71
4. Now, heres where it gets a little wonky. Take it together, more entrepreneurs and skilled workers
plus higher productivity plus increased investments in the US would increase real GDP by 3.3%
by 2023 and 5.4% by 2033 a real increase of roughly $700 billion dollars in our economy in 2023
and $1.4 trillion dollars by 2033
Our current national deficit is $18.2 trillion and unless we cut spending and/or increase taxes on
corporations and the .001 percent we are operating at a negative deficit each fiscal year. Even if
we pull our military completely out of the Middle East, we are still operating at a deficit yet
somehow the unicorn level lie of Amnesty generating $700 billion over 10 years is supposed to
make a difference? Seventy billion a year, when we spend a trillion on national defense
ANNUALLY, most of which goes to defense contractors who are advancing the police state. How
does the U.S. Government think that the current immigrants will instantly translate into an increase
in the GDP?
ObamaCare, that is how! Borrowing money is how! This has nothing to do with jobs!
It might generate $700 billion for corporate America though! If they lay off millions of middle
class employees and replace them with minimum wage unskilled immigrants granted amnesty, the
.001 percent will profit from the reduction in wages. And since their tax liability is typically single
digit, very little money will make it into the economy. Corporate taxes are single digit and most
of the .001 have their wealth tied up in stock. Unless the stock is cashed out, there is no money
infused into the economy. Plus they have tax shelters and foundations in which they move their
money around so they pay next to no taxes on that either.
We pay near half a trillion a year in interest on the national deficit. Maybe we should look at
cutting costs there huh? Amnesty has nothing to do with bettering the lives of people south of the
border or from abroad, absolutely nothing!
5. Thats a lot, all thanks to reforming our broken immigrations system. There are other benefits to
immigration reform. Immigration reform will increase the demand for goods and services which
in turn increases the demand for labor and that means more jobs for American workers.
The immigrations process is NOT BROKEN! There is the 14th Amendment and visa programs.
There is nothing broken with those processes. What is broken is the processes are not being
followed. They are being violated and abused by corrupt politicians.
Demand does not mean jobs will matriculate out of thin air. There is a demand for goods and
services now. along with a 30+ unemployment rate. Why isnt that so called demand for goods
and services which in turn increases the demand for labor working now? There are 93 million
people who have given up looking for work, not in the work force any longer because they CANT
FIND A JOB. Why isnt the demand for goods and services which in turn increases the

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

demand for labor working for them? But it will magically work when we add another 50 million
to the equation?
Corrupt to the core, lying traitors running the country!
Right now, with our current workforce, our 30+ unemployment rate means there are NO jobs.
Teens, specifically Black teens, the unemployment rate is 46% and Blacks overall are already near
14%. Hispanics are just under that. What is introducing 10s of millions into the workforce going
to do for this demographic? Nothing good, that much I can guarantee! And again, that is why
White males are attacked and Blacks and Hispanics voice on Amnesty is censored in the
mainstream Media, in order to mask what illegal immigrations is doing and will do to all of those
This will directly impact the current unskilled workforce of which a good percentage are high
school kids, high school grads and high school drop outs. This will directly impact the current
minority base and by allowing this to happen, Blacks and Hispanics already in the country are
looking at long term unemployment rates far exceeding the current 46% rate.
And guess what that will do? It will lead to a drastic increase in drug related crime and guess
what that will do? It will lead to another spike in incarceration! And it is likely most of those
prisoners will be stuck in privatized prisons where the .001 percent profit.
And more shootings will be exploited in which the .001 percent will gain support for
nationalizing the police force. And the zombies will cry for it, because its for their safety.
Unintelligent zombies will trade freedom for security and you know how that goes. They shall
have neither! Privatization of prisons is becoming a big money business, billions of dollars worth
of big money. Privatized prisons are owned by Corporations and traded on Wall Street; they have
their own stock symbol. Anything that has stock equals banks and Wall Street and that equals
greed and corruption!

Privatized Prisons
Although privatized prisons represent a fraction of the overall prison population, it is increasing at
an alarming rate. From the Great Depression until the mid-1980s the prison population grew
steadily but not disproportionately with the increase in population. From 1940 to 1985 the prison
population grew from around 250,000 to 500,000. But from the mid-1980s which just happens to
be the time privatization of prisons and the War on Drugs entered the picture, the increase in the
prison population went from 500,000 to one million by 1990. From 1990 to 2000 it increased
another million bringing the number to two million.
In 2015 that number is approaching 2.5 million.
The top Two Private Prison Systems, CCA and the Geo group had $3.3 Billion in revenues in
2011. CCA had $1.7 billion and the Geo Group had $1.6 billion.
Damon T. Hininger received $3.7 million in executive compensation in 2011.Henri Wedell of
CCA owns more than 650,000 shares worth more than $25 million. George Zoleyis the CEO of
GEO Group and made nearly $6 million in 2011 and owns more than 500,000 shares and has
traded around $23 million in stock.
According to GEO Groups website the GEO Group, Inc. (GEO) is the world's leading provider
of correctional, detention, and community reentry services with 95 facilities, approximately 72,000
beds, and 18,000 employees around the globe. GEO's facilities are located in the United States,
United Kingdom, Australia, and South Africa.

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and


Costs to the Taxpayer

Federal, state, and local governments spend over $185 billion annually to ensure that one out of
every 120 +/- Americans are imprisoned. The cost to incarcerate a prisoner being held by U.S.
Immigrations and Customs Enforcement per day is near $200 a day or $73,000 annually per

Prison Stats

According to a Pew Center finding, 1 in every 31 adults in America is under some form of
correctional control.
According to the Bureau of Justice, the total number of all persons on probation, parole, in prison
and jail in 2008 are estimated to be around 7,308,200, or about 20 per 1,000 compared to 1980
stats of 1,842,100, or about 6 per 1,000.
In the last 20 years private prisons have grown by over 1,600%. In California alone the total
number of people in jails and prisons for violating drug laws soared from 41,000 in 1980 to
507,000 by 2010. The U.S. prison population has more than quadrupled since 1980. The United
States incarcerates more per capita, or 743 per 100,000 than any other country in the world.
Rwanda is second with 595 and Russia is third with 568.
And dont buy the whole clown show going on in D.C. These drug incarceration rates have not
changed at all with a Black president and Black Department of Justice Attorney General. They
tell people what they want to hear, that non-hardened prisoners, drug offenders, should be released
and magically it never happens. But its part of the game! Part of the game that is meant to divide
the country. Of course drug offenders, like individuals who are busted with marijuana should not
be in jail. Couldnt agree more. Part of the divide game is to blame Conservatives and Republicans.
There was never any intent to address the incarceration rate but Congress and the .001 can make
it about Conservatives versus Liberals and Black versus White.
Ask yourself, if Obama can get gay marriage through the Supreme Court or sign endless
executive orders, why arent the laws changing in regard to incarceration? If they can read your
email, capture and collate data on your Facebook activity, credit card purchases, and common
searches using Google. If they can legally kill an American with a drone who is suspected of
being a terrorist. If they can pass the Patriot Act and NDAA. If you can pass the Affordable Care
Act. If you can do all of that you are telling me the President cant change the incarceration laws?
Even when the Democrats had a filibuster proof Congress? Come on! Time to drop the party
loyalty and get in the game!
These laws will NEVER change as long as the .001 and Prison Industrial Complex can profit!
Because they are owned by Wall Street, banks, who in turn own everyone in the government!
The list of companies participating in the exploitation of prison labor is comprised of numerous
corporations and at least 37 states have legalized the contracting of prison labor by Corporate
America. Corporations such as: IBM, Boeing, Motorola, Microsoft, AT&T Wireless, Texas
Instrument, Dell, Compaq, Honeywell, Hewlett-Packard, Nortel, Lucent Technologies, 3Com,
Intel, Northern, Telecom, TWA, Nordstrom's, Revlon, Macy's, Pierre Cardin, Target Stores, and
many others are now involved in the exploitation of labor.


White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

The Prison Industrial Complex produces one hundred percent of all bullet proof vests, shirts,
military helmets, ammunition belts, identification tags, pants, tents, bags and even canteens.
Prisoners are also used to manufacture ninety eight percent of the total market from airplane parts
to medical supplies as well as the following:

93% of paints and paintbrushes

92% of stove assemblies
46% of body armor
36% of all home appliances
30% of all microphones, headphones, and speakers
21% of all office furniture
100% of all military helmets, ammunition belts, bullet-proof vests, ID tags, shirts, pants, tents,
bags, and canteens.
98%of the entire market for equipment assembly services 1
Federal prisoners earn around $1.25 an hour for an eight hour workday while prisoners in privately
run prisons earn as little as $.17 cents an hour for a six day work week. This amounts to around
$32 a month! This is where the corporate vultures exploit people. Just another way around the
labor laws!
Definition of slavery: a person who is the property of and wholly subject to another; a
bond servant. Might just be me, but someone making .17 cents an hour while the owners
of production make 10s of billions in profit, is pretty much a slave. I guess the .001 will
say its voluntary therefore it cant be slavery. Try not working, and not paying your tags
on your vehicle or your property taxes. They give you tickets, fine you, imprison you,
and kick you out of your home and auction the house off. Not much difference between
being a physical slave or a debt slave is there! Either way, you are owned!
But you liberals have equality now. There is gay marriage and the Confederate Flag is coming
down. So much more important than the incarceration of marijuana offenders and being a debt
slave. So much more important than a horrid economy and poverty are. Yeah, we have
equality now, President Obama is so awesome. (SMH) nonstop!

Exploitation of Prisoners and their Families

Aside from paying people .17 cents an hour, the government turns around and steals that money
by charging inmates $5.00 a minute to make phone calls.
Arizona prisons charge visitors $25 to see inmates to help plug budget shortfall
Relatives and friends of prisoners arriving at the jail have to pay the one-off 'background
check fee' on their first visit. In most prisons, a $3.95 connection fee is required for all
calls and inmates pay an additional 89 cents per minute.


White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

Illegal Immigrations
A decade ago, more than 3,300 criminal immigrants were sent to private prisons under
two ten year contracts which the Federal Bureau of Prisons signed. It was signed with
CCA worth $760 million and today the agency is paying the private companies $5.1
billion to hold more than 23,000 criminal immigrants through 13 contracts of varying
Federal contracts made up 43% of its total revenues, in part thanks to rising
immigrant detention. GEO, which cites the immigration agency as its largest client, saw
its net income jump from $16.9 million to $78.6 million since 2000.
6. Fixing our immigration system also means that everyone, especially the companies that are paying
their employees under the table will play by the same set of rules and pay the same taxes that
everybody else pays.
Again, this is targeting small businesses. Corporate Americas jobs that reside in the United States
are Harvard, Yale, Stanford MBAs, board of directors, and CEOs. Corporate Americas labor
force is in China, India, Mexico, and everywhere else but the United States. Corporate America
will not be penalized nearly as much as small businesses. Places like Wal-Mart are minimum wage
or slightly above and will not pay benefits. Because of ObamaCare they employ people less than
30 hours to avoid paying medical benefits. This leaves the state to foot the bill which means state
taxes will skyrocket for the middle class because the state has to pay Medicaid.
7. The amount of money that these employers and workers will pay in taxes will reduce our deficit,
the difference between what the government receives and what it spends, by nearly $850 billion
dollars over the next two decades.
Most of the workers in the service and unskilled industry will earn less than $22,000, even with a
hike in minimum wage, if that even happens. There is no doubt that minimum wage should be
adjusted annually to keep up with inflation. Until corporations are taxed appropriately, any hikes
in minimum wage however, will lead to reduced hours, store closures, and higher taxes.
A significant amount of individuals in the tax brackets $50,000 and below do NOT pay federal
or state taxes after taxes are filed, they end up getting 100% of their state and federal taxes back.
Also, in many cases, individuals with multiple dependents receive more money back than what
they paid in. A significant amount of the individuals who do manage to find a job will be in the
income bracket where after filing taxes, they have no tax liability so the claim about paying taxes
is BS!
You need to have a JOB to pay taxes.
You need to have a JOB that pays above minimum wage.
NINETY THREE MILLION have given up looking.
Because there are NO JOBS!
Its a Ponzi scheme in a sense. If the bottom two tax brackets up to $30,000 are operating at a
NEGATIVE 9 percent tax rate and the majority of the people who are illegal and are given
Amnesty qualify for low income jobs, most will have a negative tax liability. So no, they wont

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

be paying taxes after they file taxes in April at the tax deadline. Taxes will be taken out but
returned at the end of the year.
The entire purpose of taking taxes out even though people will be refunded is so the Federal
Reserve can collect money, lend to big banks, allow the big banks to lend money out at high interest
rates and profit in the trillions and then pay back the money back to the treasure at a very low
interest rate. It is a PONZI scheme! Why else would they take taxes then refund them!!!!!
They will also qualify for subsidies that come from taxation and borrowing.
They are going to pay down the debt $850 billion over 20 years?
A whopping $42.5 billion a year?
How about we put this $42.5 billion into perspective.
Look at the interest paid on the debt in 2012, 2013 and 2014. OVER ONE TRILLION dollars
in interest alone! In three years! By 2033 the US Government at this pace will pay near $10
TRILLION in interest! But we are going to advertise saving $800 billion huh?
2014 $430,812,121,372 or $430.8 billion dollars
2013 $415,688,781,248 or $415.7 billion dollars
2012 $359,796,008,919 or $359.8 billion dollars
You actually have to have a BUDGET in order to pay down debt. NOT passing a BUDGET means
money will be treated like an unlimited bank account which is why the government has to borrow.
Which it does EVERY year! With what has already been spent on interest in 2015, the end of the
year projection is estimated to be closed to $460 billion, almost HALF A TRILLION!
The national deficit is projected to do nothing but go up! And so are interest rate payments!
Only a couple times since the Federal Reserve and IRS came into existence has the U.S. ever spent
less than it brought in via taxation and that certainly will NOT happen with the amount of debt we
have now plus the amount of people who are on welfare, unemployment and require social
I repeat, we will NEVER have a balanced budget! The federal government has NEVER paid
into principle on the national deficit.
Fifty million people granted Amnesty will NOT create a budget surplus.
Part of the White privilege movement!
8. So the facts are clear, the economic case for immigration reform is strong and Republicans,
Democrats, Economists, Labor Unions all agree that its good.
Of the 50 million projected immigrants, how many are in their 50s and 60s and are just a few
working years from collecting social security? Social security is already near its end of life, what
happens when the equivalent of a baby boom takes place? They are having a hard time funding
social security now, what happens when these people hit retirement age but did not pay into the
system for 40 years? The taxes that will have to be collected to fund all of this essentially is money
taken away from the middle class that would otherwise be invested into something like.a 401K!
Into our own retirement! Or paying down other debts that feature heavy interest rates!
Social Security will NOT be funded if we add millions to its eligibility!

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

With the introduction of 50 million immigrants, there will be a drastic increase in welfare,
unemployment, section 8, food stamps, EBT card, and cash payments. Crime will skyrocket; court
costs will drain the states which means another increase in taxes. Funding for the prisons and
prison guards will force taxes to increase.
Where does it stop?
What about the safety of Americans? Immigrants who reside here illegally are not going to
change, immigrants who reside in the USA illegally are arrested for rape, kidnapping, drugs, and
murder at a rate that is significantly higher than American citizens are arrested at and that is not
going to change. And Donald Trump is correct with this assessment to the point that the amount
of crime illegal immigrants commit compared to US citizens is drastically higher. This will help
the drug cartels expand which will justify the expansion of defense contracts and more drones.
Millions will make their way from South America and into Mexico with their final destination of
the United States and Canada. Many of which will be enemies of America.
With open borders, the threat is not a possibility, its imminent!

North American Union is the Goal!

The next step will be hey, we already have 50-100 million people from south of the border already
in the country, lets just remove the border. It will help the economy and the American middle
class if we just open the border and create a North American Union since its essentially open
anyway. The money we spend on border control can be used for roads, infrastructure and tax
breaks for the middle class. Oh, and it will help everyone, EQUALITY EQUALITY EQUALITY!
And lessor intelligent Americans and uninformed zombies will fully support it. North American
Union is coming or soon! TPP is already close to passing and that is a precursor to the FTAA
which is the final step before a North American Union is declared! In fact, we already have a
North American Union with wide open borders and free trade, its just not officially law yet.
" There's an old saying in Tennessee I know it's in Texas, probably in Tennessee
that says, fool me once, shame on shame on you. Fool me you can't get fooled
again." - George W. Bush
Free Trade, specifically NAFTA, did major damage to the US economy and to the middle class.
And it hasnt stopped since.
New Obama Executive Order Pushes Us Closer To A North American Union
But a one world economic system is not going to arrive overnight. Initially, it is much
more likely that there will be a very strong push toward North American integration first.
The goal will be to shape North America into an integrated regional economic unit similar
to the EU.
The new Executive Order will build on work that is already underway. We have started
close to home, with President Obama launching Regulatory Cooperation Councils with
Prime Minister Harper of Canada and President Calderon of Mexico. The Councils are
implementing work plans to eliminate or prevent the creation of unnecessary regulatory
differences that adversely affect cross-border trade; to streamline regulatory
requirements; and to promote greater certainty for the general public and businesses,

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

particularly small- and medium-sized enterprises, in the regulation of food,
pharmaceuticals, nanotechnology, and other areas. The United States and Canada
released the United States-Canada Regulatory Cooperation Council (RCC) Joint Action
Plan last December.
In February, we announced the United States-Mexico High-Level Regulatory
Cooperation Council (HLRCC) Work Plan.
Obama advances globalist '2-ocean' plan expansion of 'North American Union'
pushed by Bush
President Obama has revived George W. Bushs Security and Prosperity Partnership of
North America effort with a grandiose trade plan that transcends the continent to
encompass both the Atlantic and Pacific spheres.
In his State of the Union address Feb. 12, Obama announced a two-ocean, globalist freetrade agenda.
To boost American exports, support American jobs and level the playing field in the
growing markets of Asia, we intend to complete negotiations on a Trans-Pacific
Partnership, he said. And tonight, I am announcing that we will launch talks on a
comprehensive Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership with the European Union
because trade that is free and fair across the Atlantic supports millions of good-paying
American jobs.
Despite having demonized Republican challenger Mitt Romney as a jobs outsourcer,
Obama in his SOTU address did not hesitate to sell the new globalist alliances to Congress
and the American people as partnerships that would expand U.S. exports.
Its the same premise all previous administrations have used to sell free-trade agreements
such as NAFTA.
Jerome Corsis America for Sale is a resounding call to defend Americas sovereignty
Remarkably, the Trans-Pacific negotiations have received almost no publicity in
establishment media, though they have concluded 15 rounds. Eleven nations are
participating, Australia, Brunei, Canada, Chile, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Peru,
Singapore, the United States and Vietnam.
The low-profile advancement of the TPP, now supplemented by the addition of the TAP,
appears to have been accomplished by design.
The Obama administration is aware that under George W. Bush, concerns from the right
about sovereignty and the left about infringement of U.S. environmental laws with both
sides fearing outsourcing of jobs blocked greater North American political integration
under the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America. Expansion of NAFTA
was halted and, later, the inclusion of South America under the Free Trade Act of the
Obamas open discussion of the two-oceans TPP and TAP free trade agendas during his
recent SOTU attests to the persistence of globalists.
The president has found a way to revive the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North
America, or SPP, through pushing the Trans-Pacific TPP agenda.


White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

On March 23, 2005, at their summit meeting in Waco, Texas, President Bush, Mexican
President Vicente Fox and Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin issued a joint statement
announcing the creation of the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America.
With the announcement, the U.S., Mexico and Canada entered into an unprecedented
arrangement in which bureaucrats from the three nations would be assigned to shadow
government working groups charged with integrating and harmonizing
administrative law and regulatory structures of the three nations in a broad range of public
policy areas.
While much of the agreement was announced in Waco, Texas, there was virtually no
explanation of whey the trilateral bureaucratic behind-the-scenes work was being
initiated. Moreover, nothing was said about creating a North American Community or
advancing toward a North American Union.
By the end of the Bush administration, the SPP meetings were dropped and the name was
changed. All future tri-lateral meetings with Mexico and Canada were subsequently billed
under the less threatening designation of North American Leaders Summit Meetings.
So far, the Obama administration has pursued the TPP not under the auspices of the
Department of State, but through the offices of U.S. Trade Representative Ron Kirk.
On June 16, 2012, in a notice published on the U.S. Trade Representative website,
Ambassador Kirk announced that Mexico had decided to join the TPP negotiations.
We are delighted to invite Mexico, our neighbor and second largest export market, to
join the TPP negotiations, said Kirk. Mexicos interest in the TPP reflects its
recognition that the TPP presents the most promising pathway to boosting trade across
the Asia Pacific and to encouraging regional trade integration. We look forward to
continuing consultations with the Congress and domestic stakeholders as we move
Three days later, on June 19, 2012, with similar language, the USTR announced Canada
had decided to join the TPP negotiations:
Inviting Canada to join the TPP negotiations presents a unique opportunity for the
United States to build upon this already dynamic trading relationship. Through TPP, we
are bringing the relationship with our largest trading partner into the 21st century, said
Kirk. We look forward to continuing consultations with the Congress and domestic
stakeholders regarding Canadas entry into the TPP as we move closer to a broad-based,
high-standard trade agreement in the Asia-Pacific region.
To avoid mistakes made with the SPP, the USTR this time notified Congress of the intent
to include both Mexico and Canada in the TPP negotiations, triggering a 90-day
consultation period with Congress. A notice was published in the Federal Register
seeking public comments.
By including Mexico and Canada, the U.S. government moved to revive the SPP union
of North American nations in the larger regional context of a Pacific Rim union of nations.

Agenda 21 and Sustainable Development

These programs are the entire driver for everything going on from
White privilege to equality to Cap and Trade to global warming!

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

It is the sacred principles enshrined in the United Nations Charter to which the American
people will henceforth pledge their allegiance - George H.W. Bush addressing the UN on
Agenda 21
Agenda 21 refers to the 21st Century program that claims to be non-binding and a voluntarily
program or action plan headed up by the United Nations with regard to sustainable development.
It came about as a result of the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development
(UNCED) held in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, in 1992. This so called action or agenda led by the UN
along with other multilateral organizations and individual governments around the world can be
executed at local, national, and global levels.
Agenda 21 is an action plan to implement "sustainable development", a term coined by the
United Nations. The programs goals seek "development that which meets the needs of the present
without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs."
Agenda 21 is a blueprint for global Marxism. It calls for and is designed to bring about an
international government. It is disguising itself as a plan to save the environment, hence why all
the push for a global carbon tax and the overused and abused global warming buzz word. The
biggest buzz words people fall for to these days aside from GLOBAL WARMING is
EQUALITY and REDISTRIBUTION OF THE WEALTH. Agenda 21 brings with it many
evil ideas to include removal of individual property rights.
Congress has already tried to pass it and it will eventually pass. H.R. 2454 (111th): American
Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009 was the first attempt, also known as Cap and Trade.
Essentially it will levy heavy penalties and eliminate all production and manufacturing in the
United States under the global warming card! But dont you worry, its advertised as a job creator
and will save the environment. But ask yourself, if MOST of the USAs manufacturing is in China,
India, Mexico, and elsewhere, how are we saving the environment by shutting down whats left of
American manufacturing? Or driving taxes up so high for these corporations that they go out of
business which result in more job losses? You think China, India, and Mexico will yield to a US
law? Think they will stop manufacturing and producing? Not a chance. This is nothing but an
attack on the wealth of the middle class and another program that will redistribute the wealth from
the poor and working class to the .001 percent.
Even the Vatican and Pope are on board with the global government agenda. The Pope has
already declared Capitalism is evil, Those who dont support global warming are not
Christians, and to help the worlds poor, there needs to be a redistribution of wealth. When are
people going to actually wake up and realize that the only redistribution of wealth that truly exists
is taking money from the peasants and giving it to the Bourgeois Society? The poor giving their
money to the rich is a system that has existed since the beginning of mankind but only in common
times have they been able to hide that fact using the Media and stupid people.
Agenda 21 is designed to transition the world from Capitalism to essentially a Super Capitalist and
a global Socialist society. The true goal of Marxism and Socialism is Communism and Agenda 21
was executed in the early 1990s and is bringing the human race closer to a hybrid of Super
Capitalism and Communism.
In order to meet the challenges of environment and development, States have decided to
establish a new global partnership. This partnership commits all States to engage in a

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

continuous and constructive dialogue, inspired by the need to achieve a more efficient
and equitable world economy, keeping in view the increasing interdependence of the
community of nations and that sustainable development should become a priority item on
the agenda of the international community. It is recognized that, for the success of this
new partnership, it is important to overcome confrontation and to foster a climate of
genuine cooperation and solidarity. It is equally important to strengthen national and
international policies and multinational cooperation to adapt to the new realities. 2
As mentioned before, Bill Gates, Barack Obama and even Al Gore, Richard Branson, and Ted
Turner all speak about bringing our carbon footprint down to zero. Realistically the only way this
can happen is for most of humanity to be gone. And countless UN members, former political
figures all call for depopulation.
The world today has 6.8 billion people. Thats heading up to about nine billion. Now if
we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we
could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15 percent. Bill Gates
The negative impact of population growth on all of our planetary ecosystems is
becoming appallingly evident. - David Rockefeller
In order to stabilize world population, we must eliminate 350,000 people per
day. - Jacques Cousteau
A total population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would
be ideal. - Ted Turner, CNN Founder
My three main goals would be to reduce human population to about 100 million
worldwide, destroy the industrial infrastructure and see wilderness, with its full
complement of species, returning throughout the world. - Dave Foreman, Earth First CoFounder
There is a single theme behind all our workwe must reduce population levels. Either
governments do it our way, through nice clean methods, or they will get the kinds of mess
that we have in El Salvador, or in Iran or in Beirut. Population is a political problem.
Once population is out of control, it requires authoritarian government, even fascism, to
reduce it. - Thomas Ferguson, former official in the U.S. State Department Office of
Population Affairs
We must speak more clearly about sexuality, contraception, about abortion, about
values that control population, because the ecological crisis, in short, is the population
crisis. Cut the population by 90% and there arent enough people left to do a great deal
of ecological damage. - Mikhail Gorbachev
This year, the United States renewed funding of reproductive healthcare through the
United Nations Population Fund, and more funding is on the way. The U.S. Congress
recently appropriated more than $648 million in foreign assistance to family planning and

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

reproductive health programs worldwide. Thats the largest allocation in more than a
decade since we last had a Democratic president, I might add. - Hillary Clinton, U.S.
Secretary Of State
George H.W. Bush signed America up for Agenda 21 and the Clinton and Gore Administration
implemented Agenda 21 in America via Executive orders. Bill Clinton's Executive Order #12852
in 1993 created the President's Council on Sustainable Development (PCSD). We keep hearing
about Obama bypassing Congress as if he is the first or only President to do this but Clinton's
executive order also bypassed Congress and forced taxes and restrictive policies on the American
people. That same year NAFTA was signed into law by Bill Clinton.
H.Con.Res.353 - 102nd Congress (1991-1992) and introduced by California Democrat Nancy
Expresses the sense of the Congress that effective follow-up to achieve the goals of the
agreements reached at the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development
(UNCED) will depend on the following actions by the President and the U.S.
(1) Adoption of a national strategy for environmentally sustainable development, based
on an extensive process of nationwide consultations with all interested organizations and
(2) the Government encouraging and facilitating means for adopting individual Agenda
21 plans of action, including the establishment of local, county, State, business, and other
boards and commissions for achieving sustainable development;
(3) the President establishing an effective mechanism to plan, initiate, and coordinate U.S.
policy for implementing Agenda 21 and
(4) policies being formulated for foreign policy and assistance to help developing
countries and for domestic actions to assure appropriate action to implement Agenda 21.5
This text is similar to what the UN is pushing in 2014 under Sustainable Development in the 21st
Century (SD21).
Executive Order #12852 executed by William (Bill) Jefferson Clinton
By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of
America, including section 301 of title 3, United States Code, it is hereby ordered as follows:
Section 1. Establishment
There is established the "President's Council on Sustainable Development" ("Council").
The Council shall consist of not more than 25 members to be appointed by the President
from the public and private sectors and who represent industrial, environmental,
governmental, and not-for-profit organizations with experience relating to matters of
sustainable development. The President shall designate from among the Council members
such official or officials to be chairperson, chairpersons, vice-chairperson, or vicechairpersons of the council as he shall deem appropriate. The Council shall coordinate


White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

with and report to such officials of the executive branch as the President or Director of
the White House Office on Environmental Policy shall from time to time determine. 6
Clinton's Executive Order in regards to Sustainable Development lists "population stabilization"
as a primary goal.
Goal 8: Population
Move toward stabilization of U.S. population.
Population stabilization calls for slowing population growth and curbing consumption of natural
resources which is achieved by either reducing the birth rate or reducing immigrations. Obviously
whatever phase these people are operating in hasnt incorporated immigration control yet.
Executive Order #12852 uses words like "reproductive health" that obviously refer to
contraception and abortion which Clinton has funded and supported. Clinton even nullified state
limitations on abortion and in 1993, introduced the Health Security Act (H.R. 3600) which is
similar to H.R. 3590, ObamaCare or the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act however the
bill never made it to a vote.
And dont buy the Republicans are against abortion. They had control of Congress and the
White House for 4 years and not a peep or even an attempt to curb the laws. All of these people
are part of the same club. They all want the population controlled. None of them could care less
about any religious aspect to abortion either. Another way to divide the farm animals.
Agenda 21 and Sustainable Development has many objectives and is being implemented in
phases. Clinton pretended to support limiting immigrations just like Reagan, Bush and Obama
once did but that as you can see, they have all lied about their position on immigrations.
H.R. 2202, Immigration Control and Financial Responsibility Act of 1996 was introduced by
Texas Republican Lamar Smith and this bill loosened laws for deporting illegal immigrations.
Signed into law by William Jefferson Clinton. Other individuals who signed this bill include John
McCain, Barbara Boxer, Diane Feinstein, Chris Dodd, Joe Lieberman, Harry Reid, Max Baucus,
John Kerry, Mitch McConnell, Rick Santorum, Phil Gramm, Orrin Hatch, Jay Rockefeller, John
Boehner, Lindsey Graham, and Henry Gonzlez.7
In May of 1996, the Senate voted 97 to 3 to approve the Illegal Immigration Reform and
Immigration Responsibility Act (IIRIRA 96) known as Pub.L. 104-208 or H.R. 3610 (104th):
Omnibus Consolidated Appropriations Act, 1997 and was supposed to stop illegal immigrations
and protect the American workforce.
Florida Republican W. Bill Young introduced and signed the bill and the following individuals
voted YES. Newton Gingrich, Nancy Pelosi, Peter Visclosky, Jesse Jackson, Bobby Rush, Chuck
Schumer, Lindsey Graham, Sheila Jackson Lee, Henry Gonzalez, Lamar Smith, Tom DeLay, Toby
Roth, Jon Kyle, John McCain, Dianne Feinstein, Christopher Dodd, Joe Lieberman, Richard
Lugar, Harry Reid, Mitch McConnell, Kent Conrad, Rick Santorum, Cynthia McKinney, John
Boehner, Phil Gramm, and Orrin Hatch and signed into law by William Jefferson Clinton on Sep
30, 1996. https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/104/hr3610


White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

IRS Sent $46,378,040 in Refunds to 23,994 Unauthorized Aliens at 1 Atlanta
In what appears to be a significant oversight, the Internal Revenue Service sent a total
of $46,378,040 in refunds to "unauthorized" workers at one address in Atlanta, Ga.,
according to a report from the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration.
Brought to light last year by WTHR-TV Indianapolis, the IRS' $46 million in refunds
included 23,994 tax payouts sent to the particular property in 2011.
As the audit report discloses, the Atlanta address is one of several that received a high
number of refunds for Individual Taxpayer Identification Number (ITIN) tax returns.
ITINs are issued to those who are ineligible to obtain a Social Security number.
However, it seems, the application for these identification numbers is flawed.
IRS Refunds $4 Billion Child Tax Credits Per Year to Illegal Immigrants Whose
Kids Do Not Live in US
Q: Does the IRS pay billions in tax refunds to workers who are in the U.S. illegally?
A: Yes. The Treasury Departments Inspector General determined that $4.2 billion was
paid in 2010, up from less than $1 billion in 2005. Leading Democrats are resisting a bill
that would stop future payments.
President Bill Clinton granted amnesty to millions of illegal aliens!
In 1994, Section 245 of the Commerce, Justice, State Appropriations bill which covered the
years 1995-1997 resulted in over half a million illegal aliens being granted permanent legal status.
In 1997 under the Nicaraguan Adjustment and Central American Relief Act (NACARA)
amnesty was granted to 1,000,000 illegal aliens from Central America. The following year, the
Haitian Refugee Immigration Fairness Act Amnesty (HRIFA) granted amnesty to 125,000 illegal
aliens from Haiti.
In 2000 amnesty was granted to nearly 400,000 illegal aliens who claimed they should have
been amnestied under the Reagan Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 but were
Legal Immigration Family Equity (LIFE) Act Amnesty of 2000 removed deportation orders
and/or granted permanent legal residency to an estimated 900,000 illegal aliens. Overall, Bill
Clinton granted amnesty to at least 3,000,000 illegal aliens and paved the way for what we are
looking at in 2014, over 11+ million illegal immigrants.
Reagan And Bush Made The Same Immigration Move That Has The GOP Enraged At
President Barack Obama's anticipated order that would shield millions of immigrants now living
illegally in the U.S. from deportation is not without precedent.
Two of the last three Republican presidents Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush did the
same thing in extending amnesty to family members who were not covered by the last major
overhaul of immigration law in 1986.
There was no political explosion then comparable to the one Republicans are threatening now.


White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

A tea party-influenced GOP is poised to erupt if and when Obama follows through on his promise.
He wants to extend protection from deportation to millions of immigrant parents and spouses of
U.S. citizens and permanent residents, and expand his 2-year-old program that shields immigrants
brought illegally to this country as children.
"The audacity of this president to think he can completely destroy the rule of law with the stroke
of a pen is unfathomable to me," said GOP Rep. Steve King of Iowa, an outspoken opponent of
relaxing U.S. immigration law. "It is unconstitutional, it is cynical, and it violates the will of the
American people."
Such strong feelings are common among congressional Republicans. GOP leaders warn that an
executive order from Obama would "poison the well" and severely damage Republicans'
willingness to work with the president during his final two years in office.
Some Republicans have even raised the possibility of impeachment.
Nearly three decades ago, there was barely a peep when Reagan and Bush used their authority to
extend amnesty to the spouses and minor children of immigrants covered by the 1986 law.
In 1986, Congress and Reagan enacted a sweeping overhaul that gave legal status to up to 3 million
immigrants without authorization to be in the country, if they had come to the U.S. before 1982.
Spouses and children who could not meet that test did not qualify, which incited protests that the
new law was breaking up families.
Early efforts in Congress to amend the law to cover family members failed. In 1987, Reagan's
Immigration and Naturalization Service commissioner announced that minor children of parents
granted amnesty by the law would get protection from deportation.
Spouses and children of couples in which one parent qualified for amnesty but the other did not
remained subject to deportation, leading to efforts to amend the 1986 law.
In a parallel to today, the Senate acted in 1989 to broaden legal status to families but the House
never took up the bill. Through the INS, Bush advanced a new "family fairness" policy that put in
place the Senate measure. Congress passed the policy into law by the end of the year as part of
broader immigration legislation.
"It's a striking parallel," said Mark Noferi of the pro-immigration American Immigration Council.
"Bush Sr. went big at the time. He protected about 40 percent of the unauthorized population. Back
then that was up to 1.5 million. Today that would be about 5 million."
But a lawyer who worked on the 1986 law and the 1990 follow-up as an aide to then-Sen. Alan
Simpson, R-Wyo., said Bush's action wasn't controversial because it came after lawmakers had
made it clear they were going to tackle the issue.
That's not the case now.
"Bush Sr. took the action that he did but it wasn't as if Congress was legislating anything to the
contrary," said Carl Hampe of Fragomen, Del Rey, Bernsen & Loewy. "What's different now is
that there is no clear path to legislative relief for the class of beneficiaries for which the president's
order would provide relief."
Obama's announcement could come as early as this coming week and cover as many as 5 million
people. Like Bush, Obama is expected to extend deportation protections to families of U.S. citizens
or permanent residents.
"It's clear that it's fully within his legal authority to issue these orders," said Rep. Joaquin Castro,
D-Texas. He said Republicans 'didn't raise any objections in the past when Republican presidents
issued similar orders. This is pure political theater."
Obama's anticipated action would not award legal status, but it would offer temporary protection
from deportation and the possibility of obtaining a work permit.

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

"There's always some precedent for prosecutorial discretion," said Rep. Trent Franks, R-Ariz. "But
this president would call tearing the Constitution into tiny little pieces in the White House
prosecutorial discretion."
House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, is stopping short of threatening to use Congress' power of
the purse to thwart any executive action by Obama. Boehner's priority is to avoid a government
shutdown. But he made it clear that Republicans will make Obama pay a price if he carries out his
"Every administration needs this and needs that, needs all kinds of things," Boehner said Thursday.
"You know, if he wants to go off on his own, there are things that he's just not going to get."
Immigration Reform and Control Act (IRCA), Pub.L. 99603, 100 Stat. 3445, signed into law by
Ronald Reagan in 1986 granted Amnesty to 2.7 million illegal immigrants.
The USA has admitted near 84,000 Somalis who practice Sharia Law into the US in the last 25
years. They are allowed to practice it which is the bigger problem. More than half, 43,682 came
since September 11th and over 30,000 under George W. Bush! Most of which were located to
Minneapolis, Minnesota which the foreign born population was over 10% in 2009. The Somalis
relocated to Minneapolis where their birthrate average is 6 children per household account for most
of the poverty and crime in the city. Obama in 2013 alone brought in over 300,000 Muslims.
Muslims who not only could care less about the USA, but could care less about customs, laws,
the Constitution, or religion. Look at Sweden and the England. Rape capitals of Europe now of
which MOST of the rapist are Muslim. Think that wont happen in the USA? Like removing
anything Christian related for fear it will offend Muslims? Or attacking the Constitution because
Sharia Law and the Constitution cannot co-exist? Just another excuse to attack the country and its
laws. Under the guise of equality. These people want Christianity gone! All you bleeding heart
liberals, you might be all for that. But are you for submitting to Sharia law, where women are
second class citizens? Where they are submissive? Where they cant be raped under Sharia Law?
How about Muslims courting your 12 year old daughter? Pedophilia is not really pedophilia in
Islam. Its open season on all ages. You bleeding heart liberals all for stoning and beheading
homosexuals? Because Islam does it, because its an abomination to them.
Another objective of Agenda 21 is to establish international norms of personal behavior that
are dictated by a handful of the worlds elite who believe they know what is best for the people
and that they are the ones to dictate how people ought to live.
UN-Backed Scientists Call For Mega-City Population Lockup
In a recent statement put out by Planet Under Pressure several scientists call for denser cities in
order to mitigate worldwide population growth. When in doubt that UNs Agenda 21 is not the
Mein Kampf of our day, one should consider yet another in-your-face confession from yet
another certified biocratic control freak
According to an MSNBC article one of the scientists while speaking about human populations
worldwide, stated:
We certainly dont want them strolling about the entire countryside. We want them to save land
for nature by living closely [together].


White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

Insisting the worlds population be locked up within the confounds of mega-cities, the elite
realizes that if the herd is to be properly controlled walls are needed- thick walls, and by
constructing these walls, making the masses go this or that way will be made easier..
Chief scientist Michail Fragkias involved with Planet under Pressure told MSNBC that the
answer (to population growth) is denser cities.
The conference, co-sponsored by NASA and UNEP by the way, released its statement calling for
denser cities to mitigate worldwide population growth ahead of the Rio+20 United Nations
Conference on Sustainable Development taking place in June of this year.
If cities can develop in height rather than in width that would be much more preferable and
environmentally not as harmful, Fragkias said.
People who know anything about history know that the creation of mega-cities in which the
masses may be rounded up and enclosed, is identical to the Nazi principle of the ghetto as a
means of managing the masses. Every student of history may also know what happens to those
masses shortly after.
Some of the organizers of Planet under Pressure are founding their plea on the notion that we
(as humanity) have entered the Anthropocene: a new geological era in which humans- not
natural conditions- are the main drivers of geological and meteorological processes. Citing a
website devoted to this concept, Martin Rees of the Royal Society stated at the conference:
This century is special in the Earths history. It is the first when one species ours has the
planets future in its hands, reports the AFP news agency. Weve invented a new geological
era: the Anthropocene., he stated.
This echoes yet another scientist, a professor at the University of Colorado, who in recent times
also mentioned this new era in relation to a call for population control when he stated:
Scientists now speak of humanitys increased demands and impacts on the globe as ushering in
a new geological epoch: the Anthropocene. Such selfish and destructive appropriation of the
resources of the Earth can only be described as interspecies genocide.
In addition the professor said: Ending human population growth is almost certainly a necessary
(but not sufficient) condition for preventing catastrophic global climate change. Indeed,
significantly reducing current human numbers (emphasis added) may be necessary in order to do
The call for compact cities, filled to the brim with humans, is part of the UNs depopulation
agenda for sure. Within these proposed mega-cities humans will be allowed to use RFID
technology so they can be kept in check. The rest of the world, the countryside as one of the
scientists told MSNBC, is reserved for the elite.


White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

Agenda 21 or Sustainable Development calls for the inventory and control of land, water,
minerals, plants, animals, construction, information, energy, inventions, all means of production
and human beings in the world. This way the people in charge stay in charge, by controlling every
aspect of humanity! How do they do that? Cap and Trade and countless other bills while
empowering the EPA and BLM and countless other government agencies to control land and access
to natural resources.
Agenda 21 and Obamas Rural Council?
On June 9, 2011, an Executive Order established the White House Rural Council with 25
executive branch departments including Defense, Justice, Homeland Security, National
Drug Control, Environmental Quality, Labor, Commerce, Interior, EPA, Housing, Health,
Education to name just a few.
The order covers 16% of the American population who lives in rural counties because
they supply our food, fiber, and energy, safeguard our natural resources, and are essential
in the development of science and innovation.
Strong, sustainable rural communities are essential in winning the future and ensuring
American competitiveness in the years ahead. What kind of future are we supposed to
win? Are we losers right now? This is very vague, what years ahead?
To enhance the Federal Governments efforts to address the needs of rural America, this
order establishes a council to better coordinate Federal programs and maximize the
impact of Federal investment to promote economic prosperity and quality of life in our
rural communities. As a world traveler, I can attest that Americans already have the
highest standard of living in rural areas, prosperity, and excellent quality of life when
compared to anybody else.
Special: New Probiotic Fat Burner Takes GNC by Storm
A recent article in Washington Post appeared with the innocuous title, What we need:
Smarter growth plans. The author is Roger K. Lewis, a practicing architect and professor
emeritus at the University of Maryland. Who can possibly object to smarter growth
plans? Except that smart growth plans is the euphemism used by the United Nations
for its Agenda 21, a direct assault on private property rights and American sovereignty.
Roger K. Lewis suggests that smart growth was designed by market forces driven by
green building. He makes no mention of Agenda 21 and ICLEI objectives and intrusion
into our society since the early 1970s or the agreement signed in 1992 that went under
the radar of the American peoples understanding of the complex negative ramifications
for our economy and our liberties.
I have not met Americans who think, sprawl-producing planning, zoning and mortgage
templates are obsolete as the author claims. Would Americans willingly give up their
land and homes with or without compensation in exchange for a move to a densely
populated high-rise, with no parking garages, no access to cars, like rats fenced in a grey
concrete maze?
Communist social engineering confiscated land and homes for agriculture. People were
forced to move into many-storied, tiny cinder block apartments without any
compensation for the land or homes bulldozed. They were forced to commute by bicycles
or public transit.


White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

Lewis deems subdivision developments with low-density, detached, single-family homes
as outdated. He calls the areas educationally dysfunctional and unsafe. American suburbia
was built, he says, on four assumptions that have lost validity today:
Unlimited supply of land
Inexpensive and inexhaustible supply of oil
Homogenous land use
The American dream to own and inhabit a mortgaged house.
I am not sure on what research Lewis based his conclusions, but we have huge domestic
oil reserves if permits were issued to drill. We also have a vast land mass. Some areas
have 70 or less inhabitants per square mile. Americans still want to own their own home
and want to live in a homogeneous community of other homeowners. Just because power
hungry bureaucrats at the United Nations have decided to preserve land and the
environment for the future of the planet and its animals, neglecting the future of humans,
does not mean Americans agree to this vision.
Much of Americas land cannot and should not be developed. Who are you to decide
for us, Mr. Lewis and why? Last time I checked we were free people who determined
their own life choices.
Dependency on oil and limitless use of cars pose daunting environmental, economic,
and geopolitical problems. Who is going to decide the limit to our car use? Is it going to
be done by law, more regulations, or executive order?
A handful of environmentalists, the EPA, and the United Nations dictators, using faulty
debunked data from the University of East Anglia or phony research are trying to separate
Americans from their land use, cars, trucks, and the open-wide roads.
Lewis continues his Agenda 21 fallacy. The traditional nuclear familymom, dad, two
to three kids and one or two petsis now a minority of Americas households. I am
positive that this man is not describing America that I know and see every day. His
statements continue, Today a majority of households are people, young or old, living
alone; couples or sets of unrelated individuals of various ethnicities, ages and tastes.
Agenda 21 and Mr. Lewis suggest building high-rises in designated areas within
municipalities where new development and re-development is feasible and desirable.
Affordable housing is a priority and so are environmental standards.
It is obvious that smart growth plans or Agenda 21 designed by United Nations will
affect our future choices in how we live and where. EPA will be involved and will twist
the arms of those who do not adopt smart growth plans, denying grants to states and
cities and levying other penalties. By the time Americans realize the implications of
Agenda 21smart growth, they will lose their homes and lands with no compensation.
At least people who lost property under Eminent Domain have been compensated.
The International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI) is a conglomerate
of 600 national, regional, and local government associations who promote sustainable
development and protection of the environment because of man-made global warming
that does not exist.
Sustainable development is the United Nations effort to contain and limit economic
development in developed countries and thus control population growth. It is sustainable
de-growth, plain and simple. The focus is low-income agriculture and to set limits on
the developed world.

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

United Nations and its affiliates believe that first world countries polluted significantly
during their development while urging third world countries to reduce pollution thus
impeding their growth. Implementation of sustainable development would revert our
society to a pre-modern lifestyle.
ICLEI wants to keep the environment as pristine as possible through ideal-seeking
behavior. These euphemisms are not clearly defined in terms of what or who will
evaluate or set the standards for this ideal-seeking behavior.
Agenda 21 sets up the global infrastructure to manage, count, and control assets. It is not
concerned with protecting the environment or the worlds resources. Agenda 21 wants
change from old sector-centered ways of doing business to new approaches. The desired
future state should be to pursue economic prosperity, environmental quality, and social
Social equity is the new euphemism for social justice the Marxists in our government
have been using a lot lately. Who gave them the authority and the mandate to initiate such
change? I do not remember the American people being asked through a referendum
whether we wanted our way of life to be fundamentally changed according to mandates
set up by the United Nations. How will population growth control be achieved in order
to protect the precious environment?
There are four tiers to UNs sustainable development plan:
Environmental sustainability
Economic sustainability
Socio-political sustainability
Cultural diversity.
In 2001 UNESCO, in The Universal Declaration on Cultural Diversity, stated that cultural
diversity is as important as biodiversity in the sense of a more satisfactory, intellectual,
emotional, moral, and spiritual existence. Who is to decide the level and quality of the
populations satisfaction, intellectual, emotional, moral, and spiritual existence? Human
needs must be met while preserving the environment for the future. Again, who will
decide what our needs are in order to preserve the future?
In February 2011 in Nairobi, Kenya, ICLEI attended a United Nations conference as
representative of the interests of local governments. In collaboration with partners such
as UN-Habitat, Cities Alliance and ICLEI, UNEP (United Nations Environmental
Protection) is working to make cities more livable, better prepared for the multiple
environmental challenges they are facing, as well as giving them a stronger voice in the
international climate negotiations. Last time I checked, global warming has been
debunked as a hoax and UN rapidly changed its name to climate change, continuing the
attempt to fleece developed countries. In addition, who decides these international climate
negotiations and why? What are we negotiating? Carbon credits?
In October 2009 in Bangkok, ICLEI stated, local governments are offering national
governments our partnership in the fight against climate change. ICLEI wants local
governments to collaborate with national governments to fight against climate change,
the very change that has been scientifically debunked.


White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

Article I, Section 10 of the Constitution states clearly, No State shall enter into any
Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation, ...No State shall,... enter into an Agreement or
Compact with another State or with a foreign power The counties and cities that are
members of ICLEI in the U.S. through its national organization are attempting to
implement foreign policy, which our Constitution forbids. What mayors and municipal
governments are doing is plain unconstitutional.
Mayors and local governments set forth the following commitments to implement subnational, national, and international frameworks by providing resources, authority, and
mandate to carry forward climate protection roles and responsibilities.
There is no law or act of Congress to authorize the aiding and abetting of foreign policy
globalism by state and local governments. We have to protect our sovereignty by banning
cities and counties to be members of ICLEI, an organization that promotes United
Nations Agenda 21/smart growth which is detrimental to American economic interests,
liberty, and sovereignty.
http://canadafreepress.com/article/37561 and
This is directly from U.N. conferences and has been in the works for decades and is slowly being
implemented globally.
Land...cannot be treated as an ordinary asset, controlled by individuals and subject to the
pressures and inefficiencies of the market. Private land ownership is also a principal
instrument of accumulation and concentration of wealth and therefore contributes to
social injustice; if unchecked, it may become a major obstacle in the planning and
implementation of development schemes. The provision of decent dwellings and healthy
conditions for the people can only be achieved if land is used in the interests of society
as a whole. Public control of land use is therefore indispensable...."
To this point, Agenda 21 is not considered to be law under Article VI of the U.S. Constitution
although several congressional members and senators have spoken in Congress in support of
Agenda 21 to include Nancy Pelosi, John Kerry, and Harry Reid.
But you have no idea what is going on do you? But you sure know what is going on with
White privilege dont you!
Part of the reason for the White privilege movement!


White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

Nancy Pelosi Signing onto Agenda 21

H.C. Res. 353:
A bill to expressing the sense of the Congress that the United States should assume a
strong leadership role in implementing the decisions made at the Earth Summit by
developing a national strategy to implement Agenda Twenty-One and other Earth Summit
agreements through domestic policy and foreign policy, by cooperating with all countries
to identify and initiate further agreements to protect the global environment, and by
supporting and participating in a high-level United Nations Sustainable Development
Agenda 21: John Kerry & Nancy Pelosi & 21 Years Ago
S.J.RES.69 -- Providing for the United States to assume a strong leadership role in
implementing the decisions made at the Earth Summit by developing a national strategy
to implement Agenda 21 and... (Introduced in Senate - IS)
SJ 69 IS
1st Session
S. J. RES. 69
Providing for the United States to assume a strong leadership role in implementing the
decisions made at the Earth Summit by developing a national strategy to implement
Agenda 21 and other Earth Summit agreements through domestic policy and foreign
policy, by cooperating with all countries to identify and initiate further agreements to
protect the global environment, and by supporting and participating in the high-level
United Nations Sustainable Development Commission.
March 24 (legislative day, MARCH 3), 1993
Mr. PELL (for himself, Mr. CHAFEE, Mr. KERRY, and Mr. WELLSTONE)
introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the
Committee on Foreign Relations

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

Providing for the United States to assume a strong leadership role in implementing the
decisions made at the Earth Summit by developing a national strategy to implement
Agenda 21 and other Earth Summit agreements through domestic policy and foreign
policy, by cooperating with all countries to identify and initiate further agreements to
protect the global environment, and by supporting and participating in the high-level
United Nations Sustainable Development Commission.
Twenty-one years ago, after George Bush Sr. signed onto the Rio Accords adopting
Agenda 21, this nightmare began in our nation. That was close to the end of his
Presidency. As soon as Clinton came in, he doubled down on Agenda 21, creating the
President's Council on Sustainable Development by Executive Order. The Federal
government agencies were then directed to implement Agenda 21 throughout their
policies. The American Planning Association was given millions to create a "Legislative
Guidebook" called "Growing Smart," all based on Agenda 21 policies. When George
Bush Jr. came in, the agencies continued on their march to use Federal money to control
the entire United States through these UN directed global planning initiatives. In spite of
all of the terrorism and the ensuing wars, Bush and Congress just kept right on feeding
Federal money to implement Agenda 21 across the nation. Then, Obama was elected in
2008. What happens? Obama quadrupled the efforts. He created the "Sustainable
Communities Initiatives" grant program through HUD. Not satisfied that would do it, he
then created "The Sustainable Communities Partnership," tying the EPA, Fed DOT, and
HUD together so that all environmental, housing, and transportation programs laser
focused on federally controlling every major population area of the United States. Not
satisfied yet, Obama then created the White House Rural Council. This time, he figured
he would capture all of the rest of the more rural and open land of the United States and
bury those areas under the same Agenda 21 policies.
If you gain nothing else from this information, please realize that both parties are
responsible for directing our nation's laws and regulations to comply with the United
Nations' Agenda 21 Doctrine. No treaty was signed. The American people were not told.
The media did not announce any of this. To this day, the media, for all intents and
purposes, mocks those of us who expose this and denies there is any such thing as Agenda
21 within the United States of America.
The two anti-Agenda 21 resolutions that I and others in my groups of concerned citizens
worked on were passed. One was presented and adopted by our local Tea Party
organization. The other was presented and adopted by the 10th Republican District of
North Carolina. These are small steps in the right direction. And really, it may seem a
small thing, but look above at the links. Both of those are "Resolutions," and that is how
this whole thing began in our halls of government in Washington, DC. All I can hope for
is this knowledge and repudiation of United Nations' Agenda 21 will catch fire and spread
throughout our State and beyond to all of the nation. We cannot stop trying. What have
we got to lose? Our entire way of life and our Constitution are barely sucking air.
Now, when people tell you there is no such thing as Agenda 21 in America and that it is
a harmless UN thing that we don't need to worry our little heads about, show them this
post and those two links.

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

General and complete disarmament and U.S. military power was given over, in full, to the United
Nations Department of State, Publication 7277, Disarmament Series 5 Released September 1961.
Kerry signs U.N. Arms Trade Treaty, says won't harm U.S. rights
The United States signed a U.N. Arms Trade Treaty regulating the $70 billion global trade
in conventional arms on Wednesday and the Obama administration sought to allay the
fears of the powerful U.S. gun lobby which says the pact will violate the constitutional
rights of Americans.
The treaty, which relates only to cross-border trade and aims to keep weapons out of the
hands of human rights abusers and criminals, still requires ratification by the U.S. Senate
and has been attacked by the influential gun rights group the National Rifle Association
Among the NRA arguments against the treaty are that it undermines American
sovereignty and that it disregards the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which
guarantees citizens the right to bear arms.
The United States, the world's No. 1 arms exporter, became the 91st country to sign when
U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry put pen to paper on the sidelines of the annual
gathering of world leaders at the United Nations.
"It's significant that the United States, which amounts for about 80 percent of the world's
export in arms, has signed," Australian Foreign Minister Julie Bishop told a news
The practical implications for U.S. arms manufacturers are likely to be limited since, as
Kerry noted, the United States already has in place the kind of strict export controls for
weapons that are outlined in the treaty.
"We are talking about the kind of export controls that for decades have not diminished
one iota our ability in the United States as Americans to exercise our rights under the
constitution," he said.
Another 16 nations signed on Wednesday, raising the total to 107, and two more countries
ratified the treaty, raising that number to six, Bishop said. Fifty countries need to ratify
the treaty for it to enter into force.
"This treaty will not diminish anyone's freedom, in fact the treaty recognizes the freedom
of both individuals and states to obtain, possess and use arms for legitimate purposes,"
Kerry said after signing the treaty.
"Make no mistake, we would never think about supporting a treaty that is inconsistent
with the rights of Americans, the rights of American citizens to be able to exercise their
guaranteed rights under our constitution," he said.
Arms control activists and rights groups say one person dies every minute as a result of
armed violence and the treaty is needed to halt the uncontrolled flow of arms and
ammunition that they say fuels wars, atrocities and rights abuses.
The Arms Trade Treaty (ATT) aims to set standards for all cross-border transfers of
conventional weapons ranging from small firearms to tanks and attack helicopters. It
would create binding requirements for states to review cross-border contracts to ensure
that weapons will not be used in human rights abuses, terrorism, violations of
humanitarian law or organized crime.


White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

The NRA vowed to oppose ratification in the U.S. Senate, calling the treaty a threat to
individual firearm ownership.
"These are blatant attacks on the constitutional rights and liberties of every law-abiding
American. The NRA will continue to fight this assault on our fundamental freedom," said
Chris Cox, executive director of the NRA's Institute for Legislative Action, in a statement.
The U.N. Office for Disarmament Affairs says the treaty does not "interfere with the
domestic arms trade and the way a country regulates civilian possession."
The 193-nation U.N. General Assembly approved the treaty on April 2 by a vote of 154
to 3. Russia, China, India and 20 other countries abstained.
Rights group Amnesty International USA said it hoped the decision by the United States
to sign the treaty would send a signal to Moscow, Beijing and the NRA on the
commitment of President Barack Obama's administration to the issue.
"The Obama administration is politically committed to ending the unscrupulous trade in
deadly weapons used by dictators, war lords and criminal gangs to commit atrocities,"
said Amnesty International USA deputy executive director Frank Jannuzi.
Aid group Oxfam welcomed the U.S. signing and called on Washington to live up to the
spirit of the treaty by not transferring weapons to countries where there is a risk of rights
abuses, such as in the Syrian civil war.
The White House pledged in June to provide military aid to rebels in Syria. The Syrian
Coalition of opposition groups said this month that lethal assistance had been received
from the United States. Kerry has said "many items" are reaching the rebels but declined
to say what military items were sent.
Do you believe John Kerry? Me neither. These people are professional liars!
Here are some excerpts from Freedom from War, State Department Publication 7277.
The disbanding of all national armed forces and the prohibition of their reestablishment
in any form whatsoever other than those required to preserve internal order and for
contributions to a United Nations Peace Force.
The elimination from national arsenals of all armaments, including all weapons of mass
destruction and the means for their delivery, other than those required for a United
Nations Peace Force and for maintaining internal order.
The institution of effective means for the enforcement of international agreements, for
the settlement of disputes, and for the maintenance of peace in accordance with the
principles of the United Nations.
The establishment and effective operation of an International Disarmament Organization
within the framework of the United Nations to insure compliance at all times with all
disarmament obligations.


White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

The Club of Rome first introduced environment sustainability in 1972 in their book titled The
Limits of Growth. In the book they concluded that population growth along with an increase in
wealth would likely cause an ecological collapse within 50 years. Do you think its a coincidence
that right around that time, the auto and steel industry gradually starting shipping jobs from the
USA abroad? If you look at the major steel companies for example, they all started selling out
and/or outsourcing in the 1970s and left ruined economies behind them.
In January 1983, the regional economy officially -- that is, numerically -- bottomed out.
John Holdren, Obama's Science Czar, authored a book that featured the idea of forced abortions
and mass sterilization to so call save the planet. His book was written in 1977 and advocates for
extreme totalitarian measures to control the population.
"The third approach to population limitation is that of involuntary fertility control. Several
coercive proposals deserve discussion, mainly because some countries may ultimately
have to resort to them unless current trends in birth rates are rapidly reversed by other
means. He felt that a planetary regime, like a global totalitarian military could assume
control of the global economy and dictate peoples lives through an armed international
police force.
The United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED) in Rio de Janeiro,
Brazil, which occurs in June 2012 will be an effort to further develop and disseminate knowledge
about planning and implementing sustainable development. Reflecting a closer link to economic
development, one of the core themes for the Rio world conference is achieving a green economy.
The 2012 Rio event comes on the 50th anniversary of the publication of Rachel Carsons Silent
Spring (1962), the 25th anniversary of the UN Brundtland Report, which launched international
work on sustainable development (1987), and the 20th anniversary of the first Rio Earth Summit
in 1992.
The transition to a sustainable society will require the convergence of four major elements:
Effective laws, policies, and regulations;
Advances in science and technology;
Green business strategies; and,
Public support and participation.
A reasonable estimate for an industrialized world society at the present North American
material standard of living would be 1 billion. At the more frugal European standard of
living, 2 to 3 billion would be possible. United Nations, Global Biodiversity Assessment
At the opening session of the Rio Earth Summit Maurice Strong, the United Nations Environment
Program (UNEP) Secretary General stated the following about the Population" and warned:
We have been the most successful species ever; we are now a species out of control.
Population must be stabilized and rapidly."


White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

Canadian environmentalist, Maurice Strong is said to be the leader, the individual, who proposed
and has lead the Agenda 21 initiative. Maurice Strong and Mikhail Gorbachev architected the Earth
Charter while arrogantly boasting it as a replacement for the Ten Commandments. Makes you
wonder what really went on during the cold war when the President of the former Soviet Union
is meeting with UN leaders and agreeing on global initiatives doesnt it? Maybe the cold war
was manufactured to drive up defense spending?
Maurice Strong also stated:
Current lifestyles and consumption patterns of the affluent middle class - involving high
meat intake use of fossil fuels, appliances, home and work-place air-conditioning, and
suburban housing - are not sustainable. A shift is necessary which will require a vast
strengthening of the multilateral system, including the United Nations."
Mr. Strong is also on record as has stated:
The United States is the greatest threat to the global environment. It is guilty of
environmental aggression against the planet, isn't the only hope for the planet that the
industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn't it our responsibility to bring that about?"
This is called The Agenda 21 initiative under Sustainable Development.
The industrial revolution is responsible for a lot of what we see today, from modern
transportation, plumbing, heating and air conditioning, electricity to medicine. The industrial
revolution began in England in the mid 1700s and transformed the world. It changed human life
as it was known at the time. An industrial revolution that made a minority into multi-billionaires
and it is their greed for more money that continued to drive the industrial revolution forward!
H.R. 2454 (111th): American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009 was introduced by
California Democrat Henry Waxman and is better known as the Cap and Trade Bill. Once this
passes, the United Nations will gain control and be able to tax Americans for the good of the
planet. H.R. 2454 is just the precursor! Barbara Lee, Nancy Pelosi, Adam Schiff, Grace
Napolitano, Maxine Waters, Christopher Murphy, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Jesse Jackson,
Charles Rangel, Barney Frank, Jim Clyburn, and Charles Gonzalez all voted YEA.
Why have so many scientists been mysteriously killed over the last 24 months?
(NaturalNews) A number of experienced scientists have died, often under mysterious conditions,
over the past couple of years, the latest being a NASA expert in robotics who worked on space
As reported by Britain's Daily Mail, the latest scientist casualty is Alberto Behar, 47, of Scottsdale,
Arizona, who was killed instantly when the small plane he was piloting recently crashed into a Los
Angeles intersection in a nosedive shortly after take-off.
The paper said the plane took off from Van Nuys Airport, according to the LA County Coroner.
Behar, the paper continued, worked at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) in Pasadena for 23 years
and was also a research professor at Arizona State University. He worked on a pair of Mars


White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

missions and had spent years researching how robots would work in hard conditions and environs,
like volcanoes and deep underwater.
The Daily Mail further reported:
As part of the NASA team exploring Mars with the Curiosity rover, Behar was responsible for a
device that detected hydrogen on the planet's surface as the rover moved.
"His career was dedicated to better understanding Earth and the other planets," JPL Science
Division manager Michael Watkins in a statement.
Just the latest in a long line of dead scientists
His research with the Mars missions helped discover that at one time there was water on the planet.
Behar's additional work seems innocuous enough. In 2010, he assisted in designing a camera that
was able to capture a miniscule, shrimp-like sea creature swimming deep below the Antarctic ice
sheet, a discovery that was highly unexpected. His colleagues and research associates said he was
especially notable for narrowing the divide between scientists attempting to study inhospitable
environments and engineers whose robots are able to survive such conditions.
"From his submarines that peeked under Antarctica to his boats that raced Greenland's rivers,
Alberto's work enabled measurements of things we'd never known," NASA scientist Thomas
Wagner told the Mail in a statement. "His creativity knew few bounds. He is, and will forever be,
sorely missed."
The cause of the crash is, as of this writing, still under investigation.
The New York Times further reported that Behar ran Arizona State's Extreme Environments
Robotics and Instrumentation Laboratory, and that he "had a passion for creating autonomous
craft" that contained "sensors or cameras that could probe places no human could ever go." One
of those was "down the great roaring watery drain pipes, or moulins, that pepper the Greenland ice
sheet in summertime."
The Times further reported:
By coincidence, Behar's death came just three days before publication of the latest study on which
he is a co-author -- a detailed analysis of the melt-water rivers and moulin drains across a 2,000square-mile portion of the vast Greenland ice sheet. The paper, "Efficient meltwater drainage
through supraglacial streams and rivers on the southwest Greenland ice sheet," was posted online
by the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences [January 12].
"This job is killing me"
The Times piece was written by Andrew C. Revkin, who expressed admiration for Behar and called
him "a rare breed."

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

"I've met only a handful of researchers with his mix of skills -- most, as it happens, focused on the
extreme environments at the poles," Revkin wrote. "He'll be sorely missed."
Behar joins a growing list of other scientists and researchers who have recently died in mysterious
circumstances, as tallied at .
They include, from the most recent deaths:
-- John Rogers, a tropical disease expert with the National Institutes of Health. "Martin John
Rogers was found 'near' his wrecked car down in an embankment in western Maryland on
Thursday, September 4, 2014, after disappearing on August 21, 2014 when he left home for work
at the world-renowned research center near Washington, D.C. No word yet on the cause of death..."
--Glenn Thomas, an AIDS and Ebola expert and spokesman for the World Health Organization.
"Ebola expert Glenn Thomas was among the 298 people who were killed when Malaysia Airlines
flight MH17 was shot down and crashed in Ukraine. It is understood he was one of more than 100
researchers who were aboard the flight on their way to an international Aids conference in
--Mark Ferri, a nuclear engineer. "A renowned American engineer was found dead in his hotel
room in Salford after his heart suddenly stopped working. Mark Ferri, 59, from Tennessee, had
completed two degrees in engineering as well as an MBA before becoming a nuclear engineer. ...
It was said Mr Ferri had been under stress from his job. His wife, Michaela, told the inquest: 'He
said a number of times, this job is killing me.'"
Earth in the Balance, a book by Al Gore, states:
We must all become partners in a bold effort to change the very foundation of our
civilization. We must make the rescue of the environment the central organizing principle
for civilization."
Sustainable Development carries with it, oppressive taxes to control and punish behavior of the
middle class whom the so called elite don't approve of. They consider air conditioning, fast foods,
suburban housing, technology, and automobiles a luxury, not a right.
The question with that of course is how many people are poor and drive an automobile, live in
a house with air conditioning, and eat fast food? Far more poor than middle class are guilty which
is why you can tell this global warming and saving the environment has nothing to do with
environment and everything to do with the theft of wealth and reducing 99.9% of the planet to
poverty status.
Agenda 21 and Sustainable Development are the blueprints for depopulation and total control
under the banner of saving the environment and is led by the United Nations. By using
environment and social equality they manipulate the weak into thinking they will prosper and

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

benefit and that everyone will be equal. They are not lying. Everyone will be equal--equally poor
with the exception of .001 percent of the population!
We must build and rebuild a country and an economy where everyone gets a fair shot. - Lisa
Jackson, EPA Administration
Everyone has a fair shot but everyone cannot have an equal outcome. MOST people in the USA
have an equal shot. They just want everyone poor so they use the promise of social equality to rally
people to get behind destructive legislation and programs! If 7 billion people had a fair shot there
would still be inequality because 7 billion people cant have an equal outcome. Seven billion
people cant be billionaires, millionaires, business owners and so on. If handing people an equal
outcome is the goal, why bother putting fourth effort when no matter how hard you work or
contribute you will have an equal outcome to those who didnt work hard? That is implemented
in corporate America and in Academia under the title of Affirmative Action and Diversity!
Equal opportunity and a fair shot exist. Its for the most part, a matter of choices and hard work
that separate people. There are those who are handed a living no doubt, but that is someone who
presents a political or financial advantage for the wealthy or are born into wealth, wealth
Executive Order 13514
Obama signed an executive order calling for the federal government to incorporate development
of social, environmental, and economic sustainability.
This Executive Order comes straight from the Whitehouse.gov site. The Executive Order also
requires agencies to meet a number of energy, water, and waste reduction targets, including:
30% reduction in vehicle fleet petroleum use by 2020;
26% improvement in water efficiency by 2020;
50% recycling and waste diversion by 2015;
95% of all applicable contracts will meet sustainability requirements;
Implementation of the 2030 net-zero-energy building requirement;
Implementation of the storm water provisions of the Energy Independence and Security Act of
2007, section 438; and Development of guidance for sustainable Federal building locations in
alignment with the Livability Principles put forward by the Department of Housing and Urban
Development, the Department of Transportation, and the Environmental Protection Agency.33
We may get to the point where the only way of saving the world will be for industrial
civilization to collapse. Maurice Strong
Agenda 21s goal of de-industrializing the west is necessary in order to fulfill their true agenda.
The year after this initial brief, NAFTA was passed by Bill Clinton. Still think this is conspiracy
or coincidence?
.population growth rates have been declining globally, largely as a result of expanded
basic education and health care. That trend is projected to lead to a stable world
population in the middle of the twenty-first century The current decline in population

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

growth rates must be further promoted through national and international policies that
promote economic development, social development, environmental protection, and
poverty eradication, particularly the further expansion of basic education, with full and
equal access for girls and women, and health care, including reproductive health care,
including both family planning and sexual health, consistent with the report of the
International Conference on Population and Development.
UN General Assembly and De-Industrializing the West
At the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED) in 1991, Professor
Ignacy Sachs prepared a policy paper that outlined a strategy for the transfer of wealth in the name
of the environment. The plan was to be implemented over the course of 35 to 40 years.
To be meaningful, the strategies should cover the time-span of several decades. Thirtyfive to forty years seems a good compromise between the need to give enough time to the
postulated transformations and the uncertainties brought about by the lengthening of the
time-span. - Ignacy Sachs
The Great American Wealth Transfer to the Super Rich
The rich get richer and the rest of us get the economic shaft. That is the theme of this so
called economic recovery since 2009. A new Pew Research report, A Rise in Wealth for
the Wealthy; Declines for the Lower 93%, analyzes newly released Census data on
wealth. What they found is the rich got richer and the rest of us got poorer. The great
American wealth transfer continues.
During the first two years of the nations economic recovery, the mean net worth of
households in the upper 7% of the wealth distribution rose by an estimated 28%, while
the mean net worth of households in the lower 93% dropped by 4%.

How did the rich get richer and the poor get poorer? Most households in the United States
are dependent upon wages and salaries as their source of income. Their largest

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

investment is usually a home. The super-rich, on the other hand, are heavily invested into
stocks, bonds, and other financial instruments. As a percentage of their wealth, the home
is only a fraction.
Even though the housing bubble and resulting collapse is over, millions lost equity in
their home as well as their jobs. Many had their retirement in 401ks wiped out. The
super-rich on the other hand rode the Wall Street recovery to even more riches. The upper
7% by wealth now have 24 times more money than the bottom 93%. In 2009 that ratio
was 18 times more for the super-rich than the vast majority of Americans. This in a sad
day for America. Economic equality is simply disappearing from the landscape.

Household wealth are assets minus debt. Student loans have soared and home prices in
2011 declined. Below is a graph of the Case-Shiller home price index. Home prices
declined 4% in 2011 while the S&P 500 soared.
From the end of the recession in 2009 through 2011 (the last year for which Census
Bureau wealth data are available), the 8 million households in the U.S. with a net worth
above $836,033 saw their aggregate wealth rise by an estimated $5.6 trillion, while the
111 million.


White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and


Among households with net worth of $500,000 or more, 65% of their wealth comes from
financial holdings, such as stocks, bonds and 401(k) accounts, and 17% comes from their
home. Among households with net worth of less than $500,000, just 33% of their wealth
comes from financial assets and 50% comes from their home.
There are more Census data breakdowns on the great wealth transfer from poor to rich on
the Pew report website. What is most telling from Pew's data analysis is how the Census
overviews fail to breakdown wealth by households and levels. If one reads the Census
overviews, it appears all is well, since the median wealth has recovered from the
recession, as Pew amplifies:
Overall, net worth per household in the U.S. in 2011 made up nearly all the ground it had
lost since 2005$338,950 versus $340,252 in 2005
Yet with the same figures, the Census reports makes it seem like all have suffered since
2007. Take this paragraph for example, which makes America's wealth decline seem like
a shared experience, which clearly it is not.
Median household net worth in the United Sates has followed this pattern over the past
decade, increasing from $81,821 in 2000 to $106,585 in 2005 (an increase of $24,764 or
30 percent) and then decreasing to $68,828 by 2011 (a decrease of $37,757 or 35 percent).
Overall, median household net worth decreased by $12,993, or 16 percent, between 2000
and 2011. Median household net worth showed no statistically significant change
between 2010 and 2011.
Transfer to the super rich is not economic recovery. Yet by amplifying the median
household net worth, one wouldn't even realize what has happened without Pew Research
Center digging into the actual figures. Thank you Pew for the number crunch, showing
what most of America already knows. We have gone from a society which values
economic equality to a land of the proletariat and feudal lords.


White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

World's Super Wealthy to Transfer $16 Trillion in Inheritance Over Next 30 Years
The rich are only expected to get richer over the next three decades, according to a study
released Tuesday.
As they pass into their golden years, some of the most successful self-made Baby
Boomers are preparing to pass the torch and trillions of dollars to younger family
members in one of the most significant periods of wealth-transfer the world has ever seen.
Over the next three decades, the worlds ultra-high net worth community made up of
individuals whose net worth is at least $30 million is expected to bequeath $16 trillion
in cash, property and assets to the rising younger generation, according to the Wealth-X
and NFP Family Wealth Transfers Report published Tuesday.
US wealth inequality - top 0.1% worth as much as the bottom 90%
Wealth inequality in the US is at near record levels according to a new study by
academics. Over the past three decades, the share of household wealth owned by the top
0.1% has increased from 7% to 22%. For the bottom 90% of families, a combination of
rising debt, the collapse of the value of their assets during the financial crisis, and stagnant
real wages have led to the erosion of wealth.
The share of wealth owned by the top 0.1% is almost the same as the bottom 90%
The share of wealth owned by the top 0.1% is almost the same as the share owned by the
bottom 90%
The research by Emmanuel Saez and Gabriel Zucman [pdf] illustrates the evolution of
wealth inequality over the last century. The chart shows how the top 0.1% of families
now own roughly the same share of wealth as the bottom 90%.
The picture actually improved in the aftermath of the 1930s Great Depression, with
wealth inequality falling through to the late 1970s. It then started to rise again, with the
share of total household wealth owned by the top 0.1% rising to 22% in 2012 from 7% in
the late 1970s. The top 0.1% includes 160,000 families with total net assets of more than
$20m (13m) in 2012.
In contrast, the share of total US wealth owned by the bottom 90% of families fell from
a peak of 36% in the mid-1980s, to 23% in 2012 - just one percentage point above the top
There is a new wealth divide in the US


White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and


Average wealth of families in the bottom 90% and the top 1% of the wealth distribution,
in constant 2010 US dollars, 1946-2012 Photograph: Emmanuel Saez and Gabriel
The growing indebtedness of most Americans is the main reason behind the erosion of
the wealth share of the bottom 90%, according to the reports authors. Many middle-class
families own their homes and have pensions, but too many have higher mortgage
repayments, higher credit card bills, and higher student loans to service. The average
wealth of bottom 90% jumped during the stock market boom of the late 1990s and the
housing bubble of the early 2000s. But it then collapsed during and after the most recent
financial crisis.
Since then, there has been no recovery in the wealth of the middle class and the poor, the
authors say. The average wealth of the bottom 90% of families is equal to $80,000 in
2012 the same level as in 1986. In contrast, the average wealth for the top 1% more
than tripled between 1980 and 2012.


White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and


Income inequality across the G20 is worrying, Oxfam warns

Income inequality in the G20 Photograph: Oxfam

Among the nine G20 countries with sufficient data (featured in the graph above), the
richest 1% of people (by income) have increased their income share significantly since
1980, according to Oxfam. In Australia, for example, the top 1% earned 4.8% of the
countrys income in 1980. That had risen to more than 9% by 2010.
Oxfam says that in the time that Australia has held the G20 presidency (between 2013
and 2014) the total wealth in the G20 increased by $17tn but the richest 1% of people in
the G20 captured $6.2tn of this wealth 36% of the total increase.
That $41 Trillion Wealth Transfer Now Officially $59 Trillion
The vaunted $41 trillion wealth transfer that is the subject of every other broker-dealer
conference since the turn of the millennium has been freshly updated and upgraded:
Its now reached $59 trillion.
Broker-dealers and asset management firms have long implored their advisor sales force
to get a piece of this money in motion part of the largest transfer of wealth in history.
Now the Center on Wealth and Philanthropy (CWP) of Boston College has released an
update of its 1999 report that was the source for the oft-cited $41 trillion figure.
Importantly, the higher number, representing the amount of national wealth to be
transferred over a 55-year period, does not signify an increase of $18 trillion.
That is because the $40.6 trillion figure from CWPs 1999 study was expressed in 1998
dollars, which translates to $52 trillion in 2007 dollars.
10 Steps to Becoming a Multigenerational Advisor: Pershing

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

If you wait until the moment of asset transfer to reach out to heirs, it will be too late,
The updated wealth transfer estimate, also expressed in 2007 dollars, is therefore $7
trillion greater a significant finding given the ravages of the Great Recession, which
impacted the finances of Americans making bequests and charitable donations at the start
of the 55-year period under study (from 2007 to 2061; the earlier estimate was based on
the 55 years from 1998 to 2052).
Indeed, the precipitous decline in growth that marked the Great Recessions 2007 onset
forms the back story that the reports authors, John Havens and Paul Schervish,
investigated in their wealth study.
While they found the loss of wealth to be pervasive, with the wealthy losing more in
dollar terms, they found the impact of loss to be quite skewed in impact: the top 10% of
households with net worths of $1 million or more lost about 21% of their wealth
compared to an 81% decline in wealth for the 50% of households with net worth under
The key reason for this disparate impact was the much higher levels of debt among the
less affluent; liabilities, just like assets, are a factor in net worth and less wealthy
households carry higher debt than wealthier households.
Since the proportional reduction of wealth was smaller among the wealthy households
that donate the most to charitable causes and that account for the majority of wealth
transfer as compared with households at the lower end of the distribution, the recessions
impact on wealth transfer and charitable giving was somewhat attenuated, the CWP
report finds.
Homeowners Lost $2 Trillion in Housing Wealth by Living near Foreclosures
$1.95 trillion in property value has been lost or will be lost by residents who live in
close proximity to foreclosures. These losses include both the spillover impact of homes
that have completed the foreclosure process and future losses that will result from homes
that have started but not yet completed the foreclosure process.
Over one-half of the spillover loss is associated with communities of color. Minority
neighborhoods have lost or will lose $1 trillion in home equity as a result of spillover
from homes that have started the foreclosure process, reflecting the high concentrations
of foreclosures in neighborhoods of color.
On average, families affected by nearby foreclosures have already lost or will lose
$21,077 in household wealth, representing 7.2 percent of their home value, by virtue of
being in close proximity to foreclosures. Families impacted in minority neighborhoods
have lost or will lose, on average, $37,084 or 13.1 percent of their home value.


White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and


The False Promise of Equality

The UN, Media, and Congress do nothing but advertise social injustice, inequality, and White
privilege and how they are fixing it with redistribution of the wealth. The UN also publicizes how
they are helping poor nations become wealthier and how they are helping children around the
world get out of poverty. In reality the .001 percent are accumulating more of the worlds wealth
while the middle and lower classes merge. They are not bringing people out of poverty, but are
in fact doing what they told you they were going to do, they just mean two different things.
If any people are prospering anywhere, it is because that local economy is receiving foreign aid
which is really sent to the nations leaders which in return allow international corporations to come
in and drain natural resources. This employs some people in the local community but it does not
bring an entire country out of poverty. It is for the sole purpose of enriching international
corporations using the US taxpayer as the funder. All those profits declared overseas, not in the
USA so the corporation gets the taxpayers money and then profits while not paying a cent into the
American economy.
Equality to them means 99.99 percent of the planet will be Peasants or Serfs, and the .001 will
be Royalty and own 100 percent of the worlds wealth, land, and natural resources. The .001
percent will ALWAYS be in charge, their children will ALWAYS be born into wealth and
privilege. All the 99.9 percent will own is their capacity to work. Just like the peasants did! For
those that thought equality meant you were going to be equal and equally wealthy to the .001
percent, its time to wake up from that trance you are in!
In some states it is illegal to trap rainwater. In some cities it is illegal to feed stray animals. In
some cities it is illegal to feed the homeless. Sound like equality to you?
The only hope for the world is to make sure there is not another United States. We cant
let other countries have the same number of cars, the amount of industrialization, we
have in the US. We have to stop these Third World countries right where they are. Michael Oppenheimer, Environmental Defense Fund
We are a plague on the Earth. Its coming home to roost over the next 50 years or so.
Its not just climate change; its sheer space, places to grow food for this enormous horde.
Either we limit our population growth or the natural world will do it for us, and the
natural world is doing it for us right now - UK Television Presenter Sir David
To our minds, the fundamental cure, reducing the scale of the human enterprise
(including the size of the population) to keep its aggregate consumption within the
carrying capacity of Earth is obvious but too much neglected or denied - Paul Ehrlich,
a former science adviser to President George W. Bush
Nobody, in my view, has the right to have 12 children or even three unless the second
pregnancy is twins - Paul Ehrlich
You cannot sleep well when you think its all paid by the government. This wont be
solved unless you let them hurry up and die. - Japans Deputy Prime Minister Taro Aso
on medical patients with serious illnesses

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

The negative impact of population growth on all of our planetary ecosystems is
becoming appallingly evident. - David Rockefeller
Childbearing should be a punishable crime against society, unless the parents hold a
government license All potential parents [should be] required to use contraceptive
chemicals, the government issuing antidotes to citizens chosen for childbearing. - David
Brower, the first Executive Director of the Sierra Club
Ending human population growth is almost certainly a necessary (but not sufficient)
condition for preventing catastrophic global climate change. Indeed, significantly
reducing current human numbers may be necessary in order to do so. - Colorado State
University Professor Philip Cafaro
We need death panels. Well, maybe not death panels, exactly, but unless we start
allocating health care resources more prudently rationing, by its proper name the
exploding cost of Medicare will swamp the federal budget. -Steven Rattner, Democrat
All of our problems are the result of overbreeding among the working class - Planned
Parenthood Founder Margaret Sanger
We must speak more clearly about sexuality, contraception, about abortion, about
values that control population, because the ecological crisis, in short, is the population
crisis. Cut the population by 90% and there arent enough people left to do a great deal
of ecological damage. - Mikhail Gorbachev
In order to stabilize world population, we must eliminate 350,000 people per day. It is
a horrible thing to say, but it is just as bad not to say it. Jacques Cousteau
In the event that I am reincarnated, I would like to return as a deadly virus, in order to
contribute something to solve overpopulation. Prince Phillip, husband of Queen
Elizabeth II
Political unification in some sort of world government will be required Even though
any radical eugenic policy will be for many years politically and psychologically
impossible, it will be important for UNESCO to see that the eugenic problem is examined
with the greatest care, and that the public mind is informed of the issues at stake so that
much that now is unthinkable may at least become thinkable. Sir Julian Huxley,
Someday we will realize that the prime duty, the inescapable duty of the good citizens of
the right type is to leave his or her blood behind him in the world; and that we have no
business to permit the perpetuation of citizens of the wrong type. Theodore Roosevelt


White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

This is a decent overview of part of Agenda 21 and Sustainable Development. There are countless
books and documents available for reading and download. Plenty of people are tracking this full
time and since the beginning. I encourage you to do your own research on this program!

Globalization and Free Trade

Hitler and Stalin were Time Magazine Man of the Year as were Obama and Bush
Globalization, whether its the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), Korea/US Free
Trade Agreement (KORUS FTA), Dominican Republic/Central America Free Trade Agreement
(CAFTA), or soon to be passed Free Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA) and the Trans-Pacific
Partnership (TPP), is about exploiting countries with lax labor laws for maximum profit. The main
objective is to remove governments from any decision making processes and eliminate the ability
to fight international corporations. Globalization has drained the wealth out of Americans and
foreigners as well. The end result is to bring everyone down to the point where they can no longer
resist, making them subservient to the global Oligarchy and their rule. There will be little to no
middle class anywhere in the world!
Globalization removes borders, governments, religions, and currencies. It creates a one world
system of rule. This one world system is actually the New World Order.
Omnibus Trade and Tariff Act
In 1984, under the Reagan Administration, Florida Democrat Sam Gibbons introduced the bill and
Congress passed the Omnibus Trade and Tariff Act, (H.R. 3398/Pub.L. 98-573) giving the
President authority to negotiate free trade agreements. This act restricted Congress ability in that
it could only approve or disapprove agreements, they could not change anything. This isnt any
different than the TPP Fast Track Obama has now. There was no Internet back then of course and
the .001 percent certainly arent going to draw attention to Free Trade by bringing Reagan up!
Notice how neither side brings it up? Exactly!
Mexican President at the time, Carlos Salinas and President H.W. Bush Sr. began negotiations
for implementing trade between Mexico and the United States soon after the Trade and Tariff Act
was put in place.
Arkansas governor Bill Clinton, for example, who attended in 1991. There, David
Rockefeller told (him) why the North American Free Trade Agreement.was a
Bilderberg priority and that the group needed him to support it. The next year, Clinton
was elected president, and on January 1, 1994 NAFTA took effect. Numerous other
examples are similar, including who gets chosen for powerful government, military and
other key positions. - Daniel Estulins, The Bilderberg Group
NAFTA (North America Free Trade Agreement, H.R. 3450) is an agreement between the North
American countries of Mexico, Canada, and the United States. The idea of NAFTA was introduced
by the Reagan Administration who campaigned on a North American common market.
Signed by President Clinton: Dec 08, 1993

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

Individuals who voted in favor of NAFTA are responsible for millions of jobs being outsourced
and insourced as well as destroying the Mexican economy. The list of individuals include Nancy
Pelosi, Newton Gingrich, Richard Durbin, Jim Leach, John Boehner, Lamar Smith, Tom DeLay,
John McCain, Christopher Dodd, Joseph Lieberman, Joseph Biden, Robert Dole, Richard Lugar,
Max Baucus, John Kerry, Ted Kennedy, Mitch McConnell, Arlen Specter, Tom Daschle, Phil
Gramm, and Orrin Hatch and many more.
Illegal Immigrant Population
At the peak, there were 12.2 million illegal immigrants in the United States in 2007, the
start of the recession. Just two years later, it dropped to 11.3 million. And now Pew said
that there are 11.7 million unauthorized immigrants in the U.S. The non-partisan research
center said that 21 percent of all 41.7 million immigrants in the United States are illegal,
and 52 percent of the illegal population comes from Mexico. The upswing comes as the
nations economy is leveling off, providing some jobs at low income levels.
Since NAFTA was signed into law in 1993, the number of illegal immigrants has gone from around
3.9 million to near 12 million where it is in 2015.
What Next?
The same individuals who passed NAFTA are pushing for the Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP)
free trade agreement and the Free Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA) which includes a number
of Asian countries and 31 countries in Central and South America. These have not passed as of
2015 but its close!
The Free Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA): Citizens Trade Campaign
The Free Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA) is a trade agreement currently under
negotiation that would expand the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) to
include 31 additional nations in the Western Hemisphere. This massive expansion is
currently being negotiated without meaningful public or Congressional input. The FTAA
would not only extend the failed policies of the NAFTA which have eroded living
standards, undermined workers rights, devastated family farms, and empowered
corporations to challenge domestic public interest laws, but could also include new
provisions to severely restrict the ability of federal, state, and local governments
throughout the hemisphere to regulate both public and private services, or to provide
essential public services.
The effort to bind the economies of the Western Hemisphere into a single free trade
agreement began at the Summit of the Americas, in December of 1994 in Miami, Florida.
It was at the Summit that heads of state and governments of 34 countries in the regionall nations in North, Central and South America and the Caribbean except Cuba- agreed
to complete negotiations for a Free Trade Area of the Americas by 2005. Unfortunately,
the public and most Members of Congress are only vaguely aware this agreement is being
negotiated, and their input has not been taken into account. Corporate interests, however,
are actively involved; under the trade advisory committee system, over 500 corporate
representatives have security clearance and access to FTAA documents while only a
handful of civil society representatives have been given clearance.


White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

The FTAA would accelerate the global race to the bottom initiated under NAFTA: with
the FTAA, exploited workers in Mexico would be forced to compete with even more
desperate workers in Haiti, Bolivia or Guatemala, as multinational corporations move in
and out of the region with ease. This race to the bottom would also be mirrored for
small farmers throughout the hemisphere as the devastating effects of NAFTA on
commodity prices and concentration are amplified.
In addition to including the extremely problematic investor-to-state provisions from
NAFTAs Chapter 11, the FTAA includes provisions on services and procurement which
go far beyond those in NAFTA in terms of limiting the regulatory authority of Federal,
state, and local governments, and boosting the power of corporations to challenge public
interest regulations.
The FTAA functions through nine negotiating committees: agriculture, intellectual
property rights, investment, government procurement, market access, services, subsidies
and anti-dumping and countervailing duties, competition policy, and dispute settlement.
These committees meet monthly, or more frequently to push forward negotiations and
establish commitments. Currently in the offers phase of negotiations in several
committees, FTAA negotiators are responding to requests by other countries, and
establishing which sectors and regulations will be placed on the table or excluded from
coverage by FTAA rules. . The next FTAA Trade Ministerial will take place in Miami,
Florida November 20 and 21, 2003. Click here for more information about the Miami
Mobilization. Negotiators hope to have a final text ready for signing by December, 2004,
with a final deadline for implementation of the agreement December 31, 2005. Under
Fast Track negotiating authority, if the FTAA reaches completion, Congress will only be
allowed an up or down vote on the entire package, with limited debate, and no
amendments allowed.
The FTAA has sparked widespread opposition throughout the Americas. Massive
demonstrations have been held in Canada, Ecuador, and most recently, nearly 10 million
Brazilians voted in a plebecite to withdraw from negotiations. To combat this, U.S.
negotiators have begun a divide and conquer strategy in which they lock in bilateral
agreements with potential FTAA countries in order to facilitate the passage of the FTAA
and set a high bar in terms of the rights granted to corporations in the agreement. The
Central American Free trade Agreement (CAFTA) and the US-Chile Free Trade
Agreement are two such examples of this strategy.
Panama Free Trade Agreement (H.R. 3079): United States-Panama Trade Promotion Agreement
Implementation Act was introduced by Virginia Republican Eric Cantor on Oct 3, 2011.
Signed by President Obama: Oct 21, 2011
Those who helped export more American jobs include Jeff Sessions, John McCain, Dianne
Feinstein, Barbara Boxer, Joseph Lieberman, Marco Rubio, Richard Durbin, Richard Lugar, Mitch
McConnell, Bob Menndez, Max Baucus, Claire McCaskill, Al Franken, John Kerry, Rand Paul,
Kent Conrad, Lindsey Graham, Bob Corker, Orrin Hatch, Mike Lee, Nancy Pelosi, Adam Schiff,
Darrell Issa, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Allen West, Charles Rangel, Michele Bachmann,

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

Charles Gonzalez, Lamar Smith, Eric Cantor, and Paul Ryan. Many more signed it but these are
some of the more recognizable and repeated names.
The minimum wage in Panama is $1.22 an hour as of 2012.
Colombia Free Trade Agreement (H.R. 3078): United States-Colombia Trade Promotion
Agreement Implementation Act was introduced by Virginia Republican Eric Canto on Oct 3, 2011.
Signed by President Obama: Oct 21, 2011
Those who supported exporting even more American jobs includes Darrell Issa, Debbie
Wasserman Schultz, Allen West, Charles Gonzalez, Lamar Smith, Eric Cantor, Paul Ryan, Jeff
Sessions, John McCain, Mark Pryor, Dianne Feinstein, Marco Rubio, Richard Lugar, Daniel
Coats, Mitch McConnell, John Kerry, Rand Paul, Jim DeMint, Lindsey Graham, Bob Corker,
Orrin Hatch, Mike Lee, and Patrick Leahy.
The minimum wage in Columbia is $2.12 an hour as of 2012.
Some even believe we are a part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of
the United States, characterizing my family and me as internationalists and of
conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and
economic structure one world, if you will. If thats the charge, I stand guilty and I am
proud of it. - David Rockefeller, Memoirs.
Why NAFTA was really formed and what has it done?
NAFTA is really an investment agreement. Its core provisions grant foreign investors a
remarkable set of new rights and privileges that promote relocation abroad of factories
and jobs and the privatization and deregulation of essential services, such as water, energy
and health care.
NAFTA made it possible for U.S. manufacturers to move jobs to lower cost Mexico and
lowered wages to compete in those industries which eventually put Mexico's farmers out
of business by U.S. subsidized farm products.
NAFTA promoters including many of the worlds largest corporations claimed it would
create hundreds of thousands of new high-wage U.S. jobs, raise living standards in the
U.S., Mexico and Canada, improve environmental conditions and transform Mexico from
a poor developing country into a booming new market for U.S. exports.
The now readily availability Mexican labor suppressed real wages, reduced benefits and
limited collective bargaining power for production workers in the United States.
NAFTA requires limits on the safety and inspection of meat sold in our grocery stores;
new patent rules that raised medicine prices; constraints on your local governments
ability to zone against sprawl or toxic industries; and elimination of preferences for
spending your tax dollars on U.S.-made products or locally-grown food.
H.R. 3045 (109th): Dominican Republic-Central America-United States Free Trade Agreement
Implementation Act was introduced by Texas Republican Tom DeLay. Republicans and

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

Democrats who voted YEA for the bill include Darrell Issa, Mark Kirk, Jim Leach, Roy Blunt,
John Boehner, Joe Wilson, Lamar Smith, Tom DeLay, Eric Cantor, Paul Ryan, Jeff Sessions, Lisa
Murkowski, John McCain, Mark Pryor, Dianne Feinstein, Joseph Lieberman, Richard Lugar,
Mitch McConnell, Chuck Hagel, Elizabeth Dole, Jim Inhofe, Rick Santorum, Jim DeMint, Lamar
Alexander and Orrin Hatch.
Signed into law by President George W. Bush on Aug 2, 2005.
When George W. Bush took office, America had free trade agreements in place with Canada,
Mexico, & Israel. When he left office there were 17 trade agreements. Added to the free trade
during Bushs tenure was Jordan, Chile, Singapore, Australia, Morocco, El Salvador, Guatemala,
Honduras, Nicaragua, Dominican Republic, Bahrain, Oman, and Costa Rica.
Minimum Wage as of 2012
The minimum wage in Guatemala is $1.34 an hour
The minimum wage in El Salvador is $1.46 an hour
The minimum wage in Honduras is $1.41 an hour
The minimum wage in Costa Rica is $1.59 an hour
The minimum wage in Nicaragua is $.56 an hour
The minimum wage in Dominican Republic is $.35 an hour
The minimum wage in Peru is $1.64 an hour
Note: Notice how NO jobs are outsourced where minimum wage is even close to the USAs?
President Bush cancelled more than $34 billion in debt from poor African countries but they sure
come after you when you owe taxes dont they. Jail and fines for you so they can give away your
tax dollars! Bush also expanded a bill that Bill Clinton passed, the African Growth and Opportunity
Act which eliminated tariffs on most African exports to the US. Goods that are made by
International corporations instead of America, and shipped back to the USA tax free while not
having to pay taxes on social security, Medicare, state or federal!
Americans, because of NAFTA, are now forced to compete directly with Mexican labor that on
average make $.60 cents an hour while Americans in many cases earn $15-$20 per hour. At $20
an hour, that is an income of over $41,500 now substituted for someone who makes $.60 cents an
hour. Why would any manufacturer want to produce in America and pay $15-$20 per hour plus
pay taxes like social security, Medicare, retirement 401k matching, and unemployment benefits
when the same product can be produced right across the border in Mexico for just $.60 cents per
hour and then shipped back to the U.S. tariff and tax free? One of the many free trade goals was
specifically designed for this purpose! Why would corporate America want to pay $10.10 an hour
when it can pay .60 cents an hour, ship it back to the US tax free?
A lot of people argue about there being no more manufacturing in the United States, to buy
American products. Corporate America is the one promoting Buy American when they know
that nothing is made in the United States!
The reason why there are no products produced in the United States is because those wanting
to open a plant in the United States cannot compete with the global labor force. Even if the plant
paid minimum wage, they could not compete. Any company that opens in the United States has


White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

to not only compete with wages that hover below a dollar an hour, but they also have to pay state
and federal taxes. They have to pay into social security and Medicare as well.
The corporate elite ensured no one in the United States can compete against them. They
absolutely know that no American company could profit by manufacturing a product within the
country. And banks will not give anyone startup capital to open any manufacturing and production
plants of any significance in the U.S. that will cause them to lose any profits because the banks
own most of the corporations that outsource and produce products for next to nothing.
And they control the EPA and OSHA to ensure no American company can profit because of
expensive and nearly impossible to achieve environmental guidelines. People are told that these
guidelines are placed to protect the environment. The real purpose of these guidelines is to prevent
manufacturing and production from happening within the country. This is one means of deindustrializing the West, an initiative of Agenda 21.
The cost of starting up and operating with EPA and OSHA guidelines alone would prohibit
corporations from starting up or operating at a profit.
NAFTA failed to curb illegal immigration because it was never designed to. In fact, one could
say that it was designed to push millions of immigrants into the United States. This is why there
are endless social programs available and why they are being promoted. It was never intended to
promote rising living standards or worker rights in Mexico or to benefit Americans. Free trade is
just another government sanctioned corporate plunder with hidden benefits for the global elites.
Trade Deficit
The U.S. trade deficit with Canada and Mexico since NAFTA came into play is over a $180 billion
as of 2012. Add that to the near $1 trillion trade deficit with China.
We are not going to achieve a new world order without paying for it in blood as well as
in words and money. Arthur M. Schlesinger, Jr., special assistant to John F. Kennedy
The states that suffered the heaviest manufacturing job losses are Connecticut, California, Florida,
Indiana Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania, New York, New Jersey, North Carolina, and Texas.
Because the labor is so cheap in Mexico, many corporations moved manufacturing industries to
Mexico vice China.
-Over 60,000 manufacturing facilities have closed in the United States with an average of 15
factories closing daily.
-The U.S. Department of Labor has estimated that 3 million manufacturing jobs have been lost and
300,000 family farms have been put out of business in the USA.
-NAFTA is responsible for the loss of over 30,000 auto parts jobs in the United States.
-Its estimated 3 million distribution and services jobs have been lost.
-Nearly 2 million Agricultural jobs have been lost since 1993.


White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

-Its estimated that nearly 5 million manufacturing jobs were lost of which computer and electronic
parts have accounted for over 150,000 or 22 percent of all job losses and motor vehicle and parts
workers accounted for 108,000 or 15 percent of job losses.18
Insourcing under NAFTA
According to the Department of Homeland Security Immigration Statistics, during fiscal year 2006
alone nearly 75,000 foreign professionals of which 65,000 were Canadians and just over 9,000
were Mexicans were admitted into the United States for temporary employment under the TN
status. Not only did millions of jobs get outsourced, but nearly 100,000 were insourced under
NAFTA. Insourced again means they are employees of manpower companies more times than not.
Not paid the same wages nor does the corporation pay anything in taxes or healthcare. 19
Korea Free Trade Agreement
KORUS, United States-Korea Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act (H.R. 3080) and
become Public Law, Pub.L. 112-41 and was introduced by Virginia Republican Eric Cantor and
signed by Barack Obama.
I don't think NAFTA has been good for America, and I never have"- Barack Obama
Some of the Republicans and Democrats who signed away your future are Nancy Pelosi, Darrell
Issa, Adam Schiff, Allen West, Michele Bachmann, Charles Gonzalez, Eric Cantor, Paul Ryan,
Jeff Sessions, John McCain, Barbara Boxer, Mark Pryor, Diane Feinstein, Joseph Lieberman,
Marco Rubio, Richard Durbin, Mitch McConnell, Richard Lugar, Chuck Schumer, Bob
Menndez, Max Baucus, Al Franken, John Kerry, Rand Paul, Kent Conrad, Jim DeMint, Lindsey
Graham, Bob Corker, Lamar Alexander, and Orrin Hatch.
Signed by President Obama on Oct 21, 2011
The KORUS Free Trade Agreement was signed by Barack Obama, who of course, was against
free trade prior to becoming the president.
During the first couple years of KORUS, U.S. meat producers lost over $200 million in beef, pork,
and poultry exports in the first year of the Korea FTA. South Korea exported 700,000 cars to the
United States while U.S. carmakers sold under 10,000 in South Korea attributing more than $13
billion trade deficit. The importation of cars and auto parts from Korea have soared to more than
$2.5 billion under KORUS.
The combined U.S. trade deficit with Korea, Colombia and Panama has resulted in a net loss
of more than 12,000 skilled U.S. jobs. Under KORUS almost 80 percent of U.S. consumer and
industrial products exported to Korea are duty free and nearly 95 percent of bilateral trade in
consumer and industrial products will become duty free by 2017. 22
KORUS, just like NAFTA, CAFTA, Dominican Republic-Central America-United States Free
Trade Agreement, is projected to displace 100s of thousands of American middle class jobs that
will be replaced by part time service industry jobs. The Korean trade deal will open the doors for
goods made in China or even sweatshops in North Korea where the minimum wage is 100,000


White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

won or $30 dollars a month for a family of four. These goods will be labeled in South Korea where
the minimum wage is over $4.50 an hour.
India is the leading country for offshore IT outsourcing. IT and Business Process Outsourcing
(BPO) export sector makes nearly $50 billion. India is responsible for more than half the offshore
outsourcing industry complimentary of the United States and Europe, who account for 60 percent
of IT and 31 percent of BPO exports. That translates into over 2 million jobs in the IT and BPO
export sector and near a quarter million jobs a year that are lost to India in call centers and software
support centers.
This isnt because Indians are smarter? No, its because there is a pool of 1.25 BILLION people
of which 99.9% are dirt poor and are willing to work for slave wages. Same goes with China and
their 1.36 BILLION population! The Media and corporate CEOs preach the US doesnt have the
skills and that foreigners have, that we need more foreigners. So that big ass lie resulted in adding
2.61 BILLION individuals to the job pool using the unskilled labor card.
Part of the White privilege movement!
Estimates put employment losses in manufacturing since 1979 at 8 million jobs. The population
in 1979 was just over 225 million. The USA has lost 8 million manufacturing jobs while the
population has grown by 95 million, or over 30 percent. This does not factor in illegal immigrants
or individuals granted amnesty, nor does it factor in H-1B visas (insourcing).
Wal-Mart had revenues of 421 billion dollars in 2010. Their revenue is greater than the GDP of
170 different countries including Norway, Denmark, Singapore, Greece, Israel, Ukraine, and the
United Arab Emirates.

If Wal-Mart was a nation, it would have the 23rd largest GDP in the world.
One out of every four grocery dollars in the United States is spent at Wal-Mart.
100 million customers shop at Wal-Mart every single week.
Wal-Mart has opened more than 1,100 "supercenters" since 2005 alone.
Wal-Mart has more than 2 million employees.
Wal-Mart is the largest employer in 25 different U.S. states.
Wal-Mart added over 300,000 jobs outside the U.S. since 2009.
The average U.S. family now spends more than $4,000 a year at Wal-Mart. 50

Trade between Wal-Mart and China is estimated to have cost the United States over 250,000
manufacturing since 2001.

The CEO of Wal-Mart makes more in a single hour than a full-time Wal-Mart associate
makes in an entire year.

Tens of thousands of Wal-Mart employees and their dependents are enrolled in Medicaid and are
dependent on the state and federal government for healthcare because Wal-Mart does not pay
medical benefits. Wal-Mart reduced hours in a significant amount of its stores in order to avoid
paying medical benefits under ObamaCare. Guess how the states pay for these medical benefits?
Yep, they have to raise taxes. Wal-Mart is not the only corporation doing this and when it is said
and done, it is likely 99 percent of the businesses out there wont provide it.

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and


Wal-Mart products imported from China grew in value from $9 billion to $27 billion
between 2001 and 2007.
Over 60,000 independent retailers were ruined by Wal-Mart in the United States
between 1992 and 2007. That is 60,000 small business Ma and Pa stores shut down.
So much for anti-monopoly laws! They spent over 8 million in 2011 alone!
Wal-Mart has five times the sales of the second largest U.S. retailer which is Costco

That is combined. The Waltons are worth over $100 billion dollars. Wal-Mart and Sams Club
have unemployed 100s of thousands of people by putting 10s of thousands of businesses out of
business. These were not a few stores closing but tens of thousands of stores. They dont pay
anything in regards to a fair share of taxes either. That is FIVE people worth more than 40 percent
of the country. And then there is corporate welfare where Wal-Mart is given billions in tax breaks
and subsidies. These are state and federal subsidies and tax breaks which costs the taxpayer! The
middle class!
Democrats are all about taking care of the poor right?
Equality, equality, equality, redistribution of wealth! Blah blah blah!
Republicans are all about the .001 percent right?
Wal-Mart contributes to both parties equally!
The Democrats have had a President in the White House for six years and had a filibuster proof
majority for seventy two (72) days! They controlled all three branches of government for a full
two years. They could have passed whatever law they wanted! And did, its called ObamaCare, a
tax bill! No, they did not repeal free trade bills, they did not audit the fed, they did not fix the
minimum wage laws, and they did not address outsourcing. They did not address the visas that
allow millions into the country. They did not extend the student loan interest rates.
For those that claim they didnt have time. Congress doesnt write the legislation for the most
part, corporate lobbyists draft legislation. Legal staff draft legislation. Patriot Act was introduced
within 30 days of 9/11 by a Democrat congress. Plus, they had months before the Senate and House
members were read in so not only did they have 72 days of filibuster proof power, they had had
several months prior to being sworn in knowing they won the seats in which they could have
already had the legislation drafted. ObamaCare took a year because the votes were bought by
providing billions in grants to people who were on the bubble or against ObamaCare. They took
the full year to BRIBE 100s of Senators and House of Representative members.
Tell me what policies have changed since the Bush Administration was in power that the
liberals are so fond of bringing up? None, because they dont take care of the poor. They do take
care of the rich. They just tell people they take care of the poor and are disgusted by the rich.
But thank God we have equality where gays can marry right? Unfortunately the overabundance
of zombified liberals have no idea what the word equality means to the Oligarchy versus what it
means to them.
Republicans had control of the Senate, The House, and White House and they did nothing but
surrender American sovereignty! Bush signed free trade bills, NDAA, Patriot Act, and bailed out
the banks (Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008) in the tune of trillions of dollars and
got us in two wars in which the military industrial complex and corporations profit billions of
dollars a month. Sold into a war under false pretenses!
When will the group hoping to have wealth redistributed to them figure out it isnt happening?
Its both parties, who are essentially ONE party.

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

The .001 percent party!

General Electric, Caterpillar, Microsoft, Wal-Mart, Chevron, Cisco, Intel, Stanley

Works, Merck, United Technologies, and Oracle cut their workforces by 2.9 million
people over the last decade while hiring 2.4 million people overseas.
UPS cut its domestic workforce by 17,000 employees over the past two years--from
340,000 to 323,000 while adding 7,000 abroad. Doing so raised UPS total workforce
outside of the USA to 75,000.
Ford Motor Corporation closed seven plants in the United States in 2008 alone. This
resulted in 34,000 employees being laid off by 2012. Ford plans on investing near $10
billion dollars into a 280,000 square foot assembly plant in Mexico which is estimated
to create over 37,000 jobs in Mexico!

Most firms pay no income taxes Congress

Nearly 67 percent of U.S. companies and 68% of foreign corporations pay no federal income
Corporate tax returns filed between 1998 and 2005 revealed that each year an average of 1.3
million U.S. companies and nearly 40,000 foreign companies who did business within the
United States paid no income taxes. This despite having a combined $2.5 trillion in revenue.
The same study showed that 28% of foreign companies and 25% of U.S. corporations with
more than $250 million in assets or $50 million in sales also paid no federal income taxes.
Those companies totaled a combined $372 billion in sales for the largest foreign companies
and $1.1 trillion in revenue for the biggest U.S. companies.
These 26 Companies Pay No Federal Income Tax
Many American companies are paying federal income taxes at far below the 35 percent rate often
cited as the highest in the world. And many of the most profitable companies are effectively paying
no taxes at all, according to a new report by the left-leaning Citizens for Tax Justice (CTJ), which
advocates for tax fairness.
The think tank analyzed the 2008-2012 federal income tax filings of 288 Fortune 500 companies,
focusing on companies that were "consistently profitable." CTJ found that 111 of the companies
spent at least one year of the five paying zero or less in effective federal taxes. Twenty-six
companies effectively paid "less than zero" taxes over that entire time because of massive tax
breaks, according to the report.


White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and


The Huffington Post contacted all 26 of the above corporations. Verizon, in particular, took issue
with the report. "[T]o claim that Verizon paid no corporate federal taxes between 2008 to 2012
simply isn't true," Verizon spokesperson Ray McConville wrote in an email. "[T]he facts show
that Verizon is one of the largest taxpayers and investors in America."


White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

"The report from Citizens for Tax Justice is unfair and misleading," a spokesperson for American
Electric Power wrote in an email. CenterPoint Energy pointed to public filings that show an
effective income tax rates from between 32 percent and 45 percent over the five year period.
The rest listed a number of issues with CTJ's analysis that nearly all fell into a few main categories.
(1) We are simply adhering to the rules. Multiple companies -- including Boeing and Pepco
Holdings, an energy delivery company -- maintained that they pay what is required by law.
(2) It's not fair to just look at federal taxes. Companies including General Electric, Con Edison,
Verizon, FirstEnergy and Pepco Holdings pointed out that state, local, energy and environmental
taxes were not incorporated into CTJ's analysis.
In a phone interview with HuffPost, CTJ counsel Rebecca Wilkins described this argument as a
"coordinated response" by companies hoping to draw attention away from their federal tax bills.
These are some hugely profitable corporations paying less than you pay in federal income taxes,"
she said.
(3) We're investing in America. Companies ranging from American Electric Power and Pepco
Holdings to PG&E, NiSource and Con Edison cited recent changes in the tax system as a reason
for low taxes. Most specifically, they pointed to accelerated depreciation measures supported by
both the Bush and Obama administrations during the Great Recession.
The basic idea behind the measure was to stimulate the floundering U.S. economy by incentivizing
companies to finance infrastructure improvements (and theoretically foster job creation) now, and
pay the taxes later.
"PG&E did just what Congress intended," company spokesperson Paul Moreno said in an
interview with HuffPost.
(4) We'll pay our taxes later. Nearly every company that commented on the report cited the
deferral of federal taxes for the low rates, arguing that they will theoretically pay taxes for the
years 2008-2012 at a later date. CTJ's Wilkins expressed skepticism in an email, saying that for
many companies such the deferred tax expense often "never becomes due" and instead "just
continues to grow, year after year."
"Just about the time the taxes might come due, Congress gives them another tax break," she added.
Most firms pay no income taxes - Congress
Study finds that the majority of domestic and foreign corporations in the United States avoid
paying federal income taxes.
NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- Nearly two-thirds of U.S. companies and 68% of foreign
corporations do not pay federal income taxes, according to a congressional report released
The Government Accountability Office (GAO) examined samples of corporate tax returns filed
between 1998 and 2005. In that time period, an annual average of 1.3 million U.S. companies and
39,000 foreign companies doing business in the United States paid no income taxes - despite
having a combined $2.5 trillion in revenue.
The study showed that 28% of foreign companies and 25% of U.S. corporations with more than
$250 million in assets or $50 million in sales paid no federal income taxes in 2005. Those
companies totaled a combined $372 billion in sales for the largest foreign companies and $1.1
trillion in revenue for the biggest U.S. companies.


White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

But we need to pass Amnesty so we can increase the GDP by $700 billion over 10 years right?
By the way, the 113th Congress is home to 382 millionaires. There are 100 Senators of which 87
are millionaires. There are 435 members of the House of Representatives, of which 295 are
millionaires. The Democrats average median income is $1.4 million compared to the Republicans
which is just at $1.0 million.
Seventy-one percent of Congress are millionaires!
Tax Incentive for Outsourcing U.S. Jobs
The argument that the corporations have in the public view brought to you by the Media who are
owned by the very same corporations is that they move businesses abroad because of the tax rate
and lack of skilled labor. If that were the case, and Congress wanted them to stay in the country,
knowing how corporations lobby Congress successfully, the taxes would be lowered. It would
look great for Congress to bring jobs to their state and of course would look great for the President.
Yes, that is common sense 101 isnt it?
Of course, that isnt how it goes down! The tax rate is perceived to be excessive on purpose.
The Corporations get a golden parachute and can blame taxes and the lack of skilled labor as the
reasoning behind outsourcing. Lets look at poor corporate America and their taxes. And once
more, there really isnt a corporate America, not when most of the ownership in stock is foreign.
Never the less, the tax structure is a joke!

Corporate Taxes
Marginal corporate taxes peaked at around 50% in the late 1940s and early 1950s but have
gradually declined ever since. On the opposite end, corporate profits have grown considerably.
The major increase in profits started on George H. W. Bush, tapered off a bit under Bill Clinton
then skyrocketed under George W. Bush and continue to grow under Barack Obama. A lot of this
coincides with NAFTA. Just wait for the TPP!

Corporate Tax Rate

Corporate Profits

Over the past 70 years corporations have paid less in corporate taxes while enjoying rising profits.
And dont be fooled by the tax rate, corporations have so many write offs that they pay effectively
less taxes than most people in the lower class pay as a percentage of income.
If the loopholes didnt exist, they would not be skating out of $100s of billions in taxes each
year. Loopholes exist intentionally because corporate lawyers and lobbyists work hand in hand
with government officials and control most of the tax code! If the loopholes werent intentional,

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

there would just be a flat tax. A flat tax would eliminate 1,000s of lines of loopholes in the tax
code. It would be FLAT out, you owe 20%, 25% etc.
The so called, USA has the highest corporate tax rate in the world is propaganda. The USA
may have a high tax but they dont pay it. You can make the tax rate 100% but if you have 1,000s
of write offs, loopholes, etc. in the tax code that allows them to lower their marginal tax rate to
15%, what good is having the tax bracket in the first place?
That tax code is also there to ensure small businesses stay small! And the poor and middle
class cant write off much of anything so their tax liability as a percentage is much greater.

U.S. Corporations and their taxes

Between 2008 and 2011, 30 major corporations made 100s of billions of dollars in profits while
paying no federal income tax. Of the 30 corporations, 26 of them have negative tax rates meaning
not only do they not pay taxes, they got money back.
In total for tax years 2008-2011 four major companies profited $205 billion dollars but managed
to maintain a negative tax requirement and overall, all 30 paid an effective 3.1% over the four
years. A few of the 30 corporations, including General Electric, Boeing, Verizon, and Mattel who
paid no tax, while DTE Energy, Honeywell, and Wells Fargo paid under 4% and DuPont paid just
under 11%.
Fortune 500 companies generated $9.8 trillion in revenue, profited $663 billion but had tax
liabilities under 15%. In fact, had there been a flat tax for all of these corporations, they would pay
100s of billions in additional taxes each year! Think that might fix the economy? But we have to
pass Amnesty dont we!
The top 25 corporations alone generated $3.01 trillion in revenues and profit $358 billion. Most
of these companies outsource significant amount of their labor force so they do not pay much into
payroll taxes in the United States such as Medicare or Social Security. They dont stimulate the
economy in any form, they just sell to consumers of which a significant amount of that is on credit,
and thats it. They dont contribute anything in way of financially helping the U.S. through
employment. Then they profit by YOU putting their product on credit card because now you are
paying interest on a product you cant afford. Interest paid to banks in which they are major
shareholders off.12
All of these people putting a $600 iPhone on credit card making the minimum payment for 3
years end up paying $900 for the phone. Unless its subsidized of course!

Exxon Mobil
Ford Motor
J.P. Morgan Chase & Co.
American Int. Gr.
Wells Fargo






White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

Wal-Mart Stores
General Electric
Procter & Gamble
Berkshire Hathaway
Johnson & Johnson
Philip Morris Int.



** Random stats pulled from Forbes.com and Congressional Budget Office **

For example, Exxon Mobile generated near half a trillion in Revenue, profited $41 billion.
Exxon Mobils Tax Rate Drops To 13 Percent, After Making 35 Percent More
Profits On Rising Gas Prices In 2011
Exxon Mobil, the most profitable of the big five oil companies, made $41.1 billion in
profits last year. Although Exxon made 35 percent more profits since 2010, its estimated
effective tax rate actually dropped. Citizens for Tax Justice reported Exxon paid only 17.6
percent taxes in 2010, lower than the average
American, and a Reuters analysis using the same criteria estimates that Exxon will pay
only 13 percent in effective taxes for 2011. Exxon paid zero taxes to the federal
government in 2009.
Reuters compares the 45 percent tax rate Exxon claims it pays to the effective rate
estimated by Citizens for Tax Justice a rate thats even lower than Mitt Romneys tax
rate. Chevron, which made $26.9 billion profit in 2011, paid 19 percent.
GE Filed 57,000-Page Tax Return, Paid No Taxes on $14 Billion in Profits
General Electric, one of the largest corporations in America, filed a whopping 57,000page federal tax return earlier this year but didn't pay taxes on $14 billion in profits. The
return, which was filed electronically, would have been 19 feet high if printed out and
The fact that GE paid no taxes in 2010 was widely reported earlier this year, but the size
of its tax return first came to light when House budget committee chairman Paul Ryan
(R, Wisc.) made the case for corporate tax reform at a recent townhall meeting. "GE
was able to utilize all of these various loopholes, all of these various deductions--it's
legal," Ryan said. Nine billion dollars of GE's profits came overseas, outside the
jurisdiction of U.S. tax law. GE wasn't taxed on $5 billion in U.S. profits because it
utilized numerous deductions and tax credits, including tax breaks for investments in

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

low-income housing, green energy, research and development, as well as depreciation
of property.
"I asked the GE tax officer, 'How long was your tax form?'" Ryan said. "He said, 'Well,
we file electronically, we don't measure in pages.'" Ryan asked for an estimate, which
came back at a stunning 57,000 pages. When Ryan relayed the story at the townhall
meeting in Janesville, there were audible gasps from the crowd.
Wow, how oppressive the tax code is for these corporations compared to income tax for small
businesses and the middle class. GE paid ZERO taxes while the American economy struggles!
Exxon Mobile boasts every quarter about multi-billion dollar profits paid a whopping 2%. Poor
poor corporate America.
Exxon Mobil
Wells Fargo


Exxon Mobil
Wells Fargo


Taxes Paid

% in (Billions)

Paid to Foreign Gov.


Amazon made billions in sales in 2011 while paying nothing in corporate taxes. Amazon was able
to do this by registering all of its corporate profits in Luxembourg which is a corporate tax haven.
Google paid 2.4% by accounting for its profits in Ireland and islands in the Caribbean. Facebook
profited $1.1 billion in U.S. profits in 2012 but did not pay a single nickel in federal and state taxes
and will receive a $429 million dollar tax refund. Facebook will carry over tax rebates which will
allow it to avoid an additional $3 billion in future tax deductions as well. Think you might


White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

understand why Zuckerberg and Facebook are pushing for immigrations and the gay agenda? We
give you tax breaks, you help us push agendas says the government.
Google 2.4% Rate Shows How $60 Billion Lost to Tax Loopholes
Google Inc. cut its taxes by $3.1 billion in the last three years using a technique that moves most
of its foreign profits through Ireland and the Netherlands to Bermuda.
Googles income shifting -- involving strategies known to lawyers as the Double Irish and the
Dutch Sandwich -- helped reduce its overseas tax rate to 2.4 percent, the lowest of the top five
U.S. technology companies by market capitalization, according to regulatory filings in six
Its remarkable that Googles effective rate is that low, said Martin A. Sullivan, a tax
economist who formerly worked for the U.S. Treasury Department. We know this company
operates throughout the world mostly in high-tax countries where the average corporate rate is
well over 20 percent.
The U.S. corporate income-tax rate is 35 percent. In the U.K., Googles second-biggest market
by revenue, its 28 percent.
Google, the owner of the worlds most popular search engine, uses a strategy that has gained
favor among such companies as Facebook Inc. and Microsoft Corp. The method takes advantage
of Irish tax law to legally shuttle profits into and out of subsidiaries there, largely escaping the
countrys 12.5 percent income tax. (See an interactive graphic on Googles tax strategy here.)
The earnings wind up in island havens that levy no corporate income taxes at all. Companies that
use the Double Irish arrangement avoid taxes at home and abroad as the U.S. government
struggles to close a projected $1.4 trillion budget gap and European Union countries face a
collective projected deficit of 868 billion euros.
Countless Companies
Google, the third-largest U.S. technology company by market capitalization, hasnt been accused
of breaking tax laws. Googles practices are very similar to those at countless other global
companies operating across a wide range of industries, said Jane Penner, a spokeswoman for the
Mountain View, California-based company. Penner declined to address the particulars of its tax
Facebook, the worlds biggest social network, is preparing a structure similar to Googles that
will send earnings from Ireland to the Cayman Islands, according to the companys filings in
Ireland and the Caymans and to a person familiar with its plans. A spokesman for the Palo Alto,
California-based company declined to comment.
Transfer Pricing
The tactics of Google and Facebook depend on transfer pricing, paper transactions among
corporate subsidiaries that allow for allocating income to tax havens while attributing expenses
to higher-tax countries. Such income shifting costs the U.S. government as much as $60 billion
in annual revenue, according to Kimberly A. Clausing, an economics professor at Reed College
in Portland, Oregon.
U.S. Representative Dave Camp of Michigan, the ranking Republican on the House Ways and
Means Committee, and other politicians say the 35 percent U.S. statutory rate is too high relative
to foreign countries. International income-shifting, which helped cut Googles overall effective
tax rate to 22.2 percent last year, shows one way that loopholes undermine that top U.S. rate.
Two thousand U.S. companies paid a median effective cash rate of 28.3 percent in federal, state
and foreign income taxes in a 2005 study by academics at the University of Michigan and the

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

University of North Carolina. The combined national-local statutory rate is 34.4 percent in
France, 30.2 percent in Germany and 39.5 percent in Japan, according to the Paris-based
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
The Double Irish
As a strategy for limiting taxes, the Double Irish method is very common at the moment,
particularly with companies with intellectual property, said Richard Murphy, director of U.K.based Tax Research LLP. Murphy, who has worked on similar transactions, estimates that
hundreds of multinationals use some version of the method.
The high corporate tax rate in the U.S. motivates companies to move activities and related
income to lower-tax countries, said Irving H. Plotkin, a senior managing director at
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLPs national tax practice in Boston. He delivered a presentation in
Washington, D.C. this year titled Transfer Pricing is Not a Four Letter Word.
A companys obligation to its shareholders is to try to minimize its taxes and all costs, but to do
so legally, Plotkin said in an interview.
Boosting Earnings
Googles transfer pricing contributed to international tax benefits that boosted its earnings by 26
percent last year, company filings show. Based on a rough analysis, if the company paid taxes at
the 35 percent rate on all its earnings, its share price might be reduced by about $100, said
Clayton Moran, an analyst at Benchmark Co. in Boca Raton, Florida. He recommends buying
Google stock, which closed yesterday at $607.98.
The company, which tells employees dont be evil in its code of conduct, has cut its effective
tax rate abroad more than its peers in the technology sector: Apple Inc., the maker of the iPhone;
Microsoft, the largest software company; International Business Machines Corp., the biggest
computer-services provider; and Oracle Corp., the second-biggest software company. Those
companies reported rates that ranged between 4.5 percent and 25.8 percent for 2007 through
Google is flying a banner of doing no evil, and then theyre perpetrating evil under our noses,
said Abraham J. Briloff, a professor emeritus of accounting at Baruch College in New York who
has examined Googles tax disclosures.
Who is it that paid for the underlying concept on which they built these billions of dollars of
revenues? Briloff said. It was paid for by the United States citizenry.
Taxpayer Funding
The U.S. National Science Foundation funded the mid-1990s research at Stanford University that
helped lead to Googles creation. Taxpayers also paid for a scholarship for the companys
cofounder, Sergey Brin, while he worked on that research. Google now has a stock market value
of $194.2 billion.
Googles annual reports from 2007 to 2009 ascribe a cumulative $3.1 billion tax savings to the
foreign rate differential. Such entries typically describe how much tax U.S. companies save
from profits earned overseas.
In February, the Obama administration proposed measures to curb shifting profits offshore, part
of a package intended to raise $12 billion a year over the coming decade. While the key
proposals largely havent advanced in Congress, the IRS said in April it would devote additional
agents and lawyers to focus on five large transfer pricing arrangements.
Arms Length
Income shifting commonly begins when companies like Google sell or license the foreign rights
to intellectual property developed in the U.S. to a subsidiary in a low-tax country. That means

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

foreign profits based on the technology get attributed to the offshore unit, not the parent. Under
U.S. tax rules, subsidiaries must pay arms length prices for the rights -- or the amount an
unrelated company would.
Because the payments contribute to taxable income, the parent company has an incentive to set
them as low as possible. Cutting the foreign subsidiarys expenses effectively shifts profits
After three years of negotiations, Google received approval from the IRS in 2006 for its transfer
pricing arrangement, according to filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
The IRS gave its consent in a secret pact known as an advanced pricing agreement. Google
wouldnt discuss the price set under the arrangement, which licensed the rights to its search and
advertising technology and other intangible property for Europe, the Middle East and Africa to a
unit called Google Ireland Holdings, according to a person familiar with the matter.
Dublin Office
That licensee in turn owns Google Ireland Limited, which employs almost 2,000 people in a
silvery glass office building in central Dublin, a block from the citys Grand Canal. The Dublin
subsidiary sells advertising globally and was credited by Google with 88 percent of its $12.5
billion in non-U.S. sales in 2009.
Allocating the revenue to Ireland helps Google avoid income taxes in the U.S., where most of its
technology was developed. The arrangement also reduces the companys liabilities in relatively
high-tax European countries where many of its customers are located.
The profits dont stay with the Dublin subsidiary, which reported pretax income of less than 1
percent of sales in 2008, according to Irish records. Thats largely because it paid $5.4 billion in
royalties to Google Ireland Holdings, which has its effective centre of management in
Bermuda, according to company filings.
Law Firm Directors
This Bermuda-managed entity is owned by a pair of Google subsidiaries that list as their
directors two attorneys and a manager at Conyers Dill & Pearman, a Hamilton, Bermuda law
Tax planners call such an arrangement a Double Irish because it relies on two Irish companies.
One pays royalties to use intellectual property, generating expenses that reduce Irish taxable
income. The second collects the royalties in a tax haven like Bermuda, avoiding Irish taxes.
To steer clear of an Irish withholding tax, payments from Googles Dublin unit dont go directly
to Bermuda. A brief detour to the Netherlands avoids that liability, because Irish tax law exempts
certain royalties to companies in other EU-member nations. The fees first go to a Dutch unit,
Google Netherlands Holdings B.V., which pays out about 99.8 percent of what it collects to the
Bermuda entity, company filings show. The Amsterdam-based subsidiary lists no employees.
The Dutch Sandwich
Inserting the Netherlands stopover between two other units gives rise to the Dutch Sandwich
The sandwich leaves no tax behind to taste, said Murphy of Tax Research LLP.
Microsoft, based in Redmond, Washington, has also used a Double Irish structure, according to
company filings overseas. Forest Laboratories Inc., maker of the antidepressant Lexapro, does as
well, Bloomberg News reported in May. The New York-based drug manufacturer claims that
most of its profits are earned overseas even though its sales are almost entirely in the U.S. Forest
later disclosed that its transfer pricing was being audited by the IRS.


White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

Since the 1960s, Ireland has pursued a strategy of offering tax incentives to attract
multinationals. A lesser-appreciated aspect of Irelands appeal is that it allows companies to shift
income out of the country with minimal tax consequences, said Jim Stewart, a senior lecturer in
finance at Trinity Colleges school of business in Dublin.
Getting Profits Out
You accumulate profits within Ireland, but then you get them out of the country relatively
easily, Stewart said. And you do it by using Bermuda.
Eoin Dorgan, a spokesman for the Irish Department of Finance, declined to comment on
Googles strategies specifically. Ireland always seeks to ensure that the profits charged in
Ireland fully reflect the functions, assets and risks located here by multinational groups, he said.
Once Googles non-U.S. profits hit Bermuda, they become difficult to track. The subsidiary
managed there changed its legal form of organization in 2006 to become a so-called unlimited
liability company. Under Irish rules, that means its not required to disclose such financial
information as income statements or balance sheets.
Sticking an unlimited company in the group structure has become more common in Ireland,
largely to prevent disclosure, Stewart said.
Deferred Indefinitely
Technically, multinationals that shift profits overseas are deferring U.S. income taxes, not
avoiding them permanently. The deferral lasts until companies decide to bring the earnings back
to the U.S. In practice, they rarely repatriate significant portions, thus avoiding the taxes
indefinitely, said Michelle Hanlon, an accounting professor at the Massachusetts Institute of
U.S. policy makers, meanwhile, have taken halting steps to address concerns about transfer
pricing. In 2009, the Treasury Department proposed levying taxes on certain payments between
U.S. companies foreign subsidiaries.
Treasury officials, who estimated the policy change would raise $86.5 billion in new revenue
over the next decade, dropped it after Congress and Treasury were lobbied by companies,
including manufacturing and media conglomerate General Electric Co., health-product maker
Johnson & Johnson and coffee giant Starbucks Corp., according to federal disclosures compiled
by the non-profit Center for Responsive Politics.
Administration Concerned
While the administration remains concerned about potential abuses, officials decided to defer
consideration of how to reform those rules until they can be studied more broadly, said Sandra
Salstrom, a Treasury spokeswoman. The White House still proposes to tax excessive profits of
offshore subsidiaries as a curb on income shifting, she said.
The rules for transfer pricing should be replaced with a system that allocates profits among
countries the way most U.S. states with a corporate income tax do -- based on such aspects as
sales or number of employees in each jurisdiction, said Reuven S. Avi-Yonah, director of the
international tax program at the University of Michigan Law School.
The system is broken and I think it needs to be scrapped, said Avi-Yonah, also a special
counsel at law firm Steptoe & Johnson LLP in Washington D.C. Companies are getting away
with murder.


White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

The federal government provides tax breaks to individuals and companies each year that exceed
a $1 trillion dollars. And I know its a redundant statement, but these tax structures and tax
loopholes are created by Congress for these corporations. These corporations are taking advantage
of what Congress and the IRS put in the tax code for them. If these corporations were really meant
to pay these taxes, there would be no loopholes and there would be a flat amount owed.
There would be a FLAT TAX period!
The effective corporate tax rate has been going down for decades, hitting a 40-year low even
as corporate profits continually reach all-time highs. I cant stress enough, our Congress, the
Democrats, Obama, pushing the occupy agenda is a sham. These people wrote those tax codes,
voted on them and passed them. Congress and Co. are Wall Street and the Media is practicing the
art of misdirection so we all focus less on what the government is doing and blame Wall Street
who couldnt care less how many people occupy.
And guess who is against corporate welfare, insourcing, illegal immigrations, bank bailouts,
bringing jobs back to America? The Tea Party. And that is why the corporate Media attacked them
and why people like the Koch Brothers identified themselves with the Tea Party. To destroy the
movement. To label it a bunch of gun toting White men who are racist. They shut that down
because the corporate masters dont want people uniting. They dont want the general population
to wake up and realize the very same people they vote for are helping to enslave them! And I just
have to say it again, it is amazing how many stupid people saw a news clip on MSNBC, CNN,
Salon, the Huffington Post, and bought that BS. Amazing!
Corporations certainly wouldnt be paying foreign taxes if they werent producing their product
overseas now would they? If they were producing in the United States, there would be no foreign
tax, there would only be an export and import tax. It would also mean the United States would
have a trade surplus, not a trillion dollar trade deficit.
Loopholes in the existing tax code also encourage and reward large corporations to game the
system by treating their profits as having been earned abroad, even if they were actually earned in
the United States. All of these codes and programs allow multinational corporations to shift costs,
resulting in the United States losing hundreds of billions of dollars in tax revenue annually.
Jeffrey Immelt, the CEO of General Electric, is credited with shipping 25,000 jobs
abroad and eliminating another 12,000 since taking over GE in 2001.
GE has closed more than 30 U.S. plants since Obama took office. 30 percent of GEs business
was overseas in 2000; today its 46 percent, and the majority of GEs employees are now
GE now hires an engineer a day at its 1,050-staff engineering and design center in Queretaro
with starting pay there is one-third of U.S. salaries. GM started closing factories in Flint,
Michigan in the mid 1980s and moved them to Mexico. This allowed them to hire 10
engineers at $100,000 versus paying one engineer $100,000 as they did in the United States
Since 2006, GE has struck deals to sell Mexican companies $350 million worth of turbines
built in Houston, 100 locomotives made in Erie, Pa., and scores of aircraft engines. GE Capital
has amassed $10 billion in real estate, corporate loans, mortgages, and other assets south of
the border.


White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

We are returning to a time in this nation's history, when there was no middle-class. There
will be once again, be only the rich and the poor. By moving to a country whose standard of
living is incredibly low, they basically eliminate their payroll, which amounts to slave labor.
Thus, allowing for huge profits.

Why pay Americans $45,000 when an entry-level IT worker in China can be paid $7,000 a year.
An IT worker in India receives an estimated annual income of $8,400. Why pay an IT manager in
the United States $100,000 when you can pay an IT manger in China under $23,000 or one in India
$30,000 a year. These corporations that outsource have NO Medical expenses, NO Social
Security, NO federal or state taxes associated with the outsourced employment! Individuals
making that kind of money in their country are doing very well financially. It is also why
Americans not employed in the IT field are now left to find work. It is why every time you call
tech support, someone from India answers the phone!

Indias minimum wage is $.28 cents an hour. In Ahmedabad that comes out to $54 a month
and in Delhi it is $147 a month.
In Indonesia, the minimum wage is $.42 cents an hour.
Chinas minimum wage is $.80 cents an hour and varies slightly depending on the area.

The USA has lost over 350,000 call centers to India and around 400,000 to the Philippines. Call
centers in the Philippines produced over $6 billion in revenue in 2012. It is estimated that those
figures will grow annually by 15% to 20%. By comparison, India's call centers generated near $6
billion in revenue. Some of the biggest exporters of call centers are AT&T, JPMorgan Chase and
Accenture, who is the outsourcing company of choice, has 20,000 employees in the Philippines
who are employed as software developers. Accenture profits $25 billion a year helping
corporations ship jobs overseas!

Minimum wage law in the Philippines is $0.61 cents an hour.

Current projections indicate that services outsourced to the Philippines from around the world will
generate up to $100 billion by 2020, which will control 20% of global off-shoring market shares.
In 2002, Forrester Research projected 3.3 million jobs would be outsourced from the USA between
2000 and 2015, accounting for nearly 220,000 a year. Of the 220,000, most of these were projected
to be call center positions, with about 15% or 33,000 of the 220,000 being middle class IT jobs or
in total, 500,000 IT jobs over that time period.

Cant send the job overseas? No problem, Corporate America will bring the people to the United
States. Generally, a citizen of a foreign country who wishes to enter the United States must first

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

obtain a visa, either a nonimmigrant visa for temporary stay, or an immigrant visa for permanent
residence. NAFTA signed by Bill Clinton created the H-1B Visa program.
What is the H-1B Visa program?
The H-1B visa is a non-immigrant visa program that allows employers to import up to 65,000
foreign workers each year to fill jobs that require "highly specialized knowledge" which if
immigration reform passes, will expand dramatically. The bipartisan Immigration Innovation Act
of 2013, or Amnesty Bill as mentioned previously would increase that cap to as many as 300,000
foreign workers in the STEM field annually.
Brad Smith, Microsoft's executive vice president, presented a plan to add 20,000 H-1B visas and
an equal number of STEM visa green cards to help companies get qualified workers.
Sure, its for qualified workers!
Qualified to Brad and Corporate America means willing to work long hours at low pay while
avoiding having to pay taxes.
Microsoft is recommending that Congress invest the money paid for the visas -- estimated at
up to $500 million year -- in Science, Technology, Engineering and Math, or STEM, education
programs. 34
The following is a breakdown of STEM related degrees and graduates in 2009 alone.
Computer Science/Information Science
Physical Sciences
Roughly 152,000 students in the United States each year graduate with degrees in the STEM field.
So what Corporate America wants to do is ensure they can bring in double that, over 300,000
foreigners each year because they claim they cant get qualified individuals to fill the jobs. Of the
152,000 students who have STEM degrees how many have large student loans? Do you buy that
a majority of the 152,000 students are not qualified?
Me neither!
Its another tactic to avoid taxation and control the American workforce through employment
and debt.
Top users of H-1B visas are offshore outsourcers
Today there are 1.6 million middle class jobs inside America being done by foreign workers. This
number is increasing annually. Out of those jobs, about 300,000 are already H-1B workers from
Microsoft, IBM, and Apple are some of the top abusers of the H-1B program! With H-1B visas,
these people are contracted out through manpower companies like Accenture. They are employees
of a manpower company, not employees of the corporation they work for. This is how Corporate
America works the system-- avoid labor laws and taxation.
All of you college students who actually busted your asses and got STEM degrees, who have
large student loans, is this sinking in? How else to control a future generation than to control their
debt and job placement! You have huge student loans which the bankers are making a fortune in
interest while you cant find a job because that same group of people outsourced millions of them

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

or are insourcing millions of them with H-1B visas. Just like the IRS and W2 structure, if these
students default on Federal loans, in comes the garnishment when they do find a job. So if you
have a $100,000 dollar student loan and have to pay $600 a month and find a low paying job, they
will rob you to pay the bankers! It encourages people to stay on unemployment because
unemployment benefits cannot be garnished! Yet!
Dont even buy the we dont have enough qualified students BS they are selling. They flat
out do not want to pay the wages so they are contributing to the destruction of the country. All
you college students out there protesting the Republicans better think about that! It is not
Republicans or Democrats; it is corporate America, Wall Street and the banks. Democrats and
Republicans have sold you, your children, your childrens children, the entire country down the
but tell the people you are and they will believe it. If you cant send the job overseas, bring
overseas to the job. But they tell you they are creating them so it must be true right? The
government doesnt lie to its people!
In short, the house of world order will have to be built from the bottom up rather than
from the top down. It will look like a great booming, buzzing confusion, to use William
James famous description of reality, but an end run around national sovereignty,
eroding it piece by piece, will accomplish much more than the old-fashioned frontal
assault. - Richard N. Gardner, former deputy assistant Secretary of State to Kennedy
and Johnson, April 1974
Richard Gardner is a member of the Trilateral Commission and Council on Foreign Relations
(CFR) journal Foreign Affairs.
Exposing Two Microsoft Scams: The Billion Dollar Tax Avoidance Scam and
the H-1B Union Busting Scam
Last year, Microsoft reported making a record profit of $23 billion on $70 billion
in sales. Had Microsoft paid their fair share of State taxes, they would have paid
1.5 Percent times $70 billion or one billion dollars in State taxes. This still would
have left Microsoft a record profit of $22 billion and they could have deducted
the one billion in State taxes from their federal taxes. Instead, despite $23 billion in
record profits, Microsoft paid next to nothing in State taxes!
In this report, we detail why the Microsoft Billion Dollar Per year Tax Scam not
only risks the future of one million children who must endure some of the lowest
funded most over-crowded schools in the nation but also has robbed our families
of tens of thousands of jobs here in Washington State. Tax Breaks for Wealthy
Multinational Corporations Do Not Create JobsJust the opposite, they cost jobs!
Pink Slips at Disney. But First, Training Foreign Replacements.
While families rode the Seven Dwarfs Mine Train and searched for Nemo on clamobiles
in the theme parks, these workers monitored computers in industrial buildings nearby,
making sure millions of Walt Disney World ticket sales, store purchases and hotel


White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

reservations went through without a hitch. Some were performing so well that they
thought they had been called in for bonuses.
Instead, about 250 Disney employees were told in late October that they would be laid
off. Many of their jobs were transferred to immigrants on temporary visas for highly
skilled technical workers, who were brought in by an outsourcing firm based in India.
Over the next three months, some Disney employees were required to train their
replacements to do the jobs they had lost.
I just couldnt believe they could fly people in to sit at our desks and take over our jobs
exactly, said one former worker, an American in his 40s who remains unemployed since
his last day at Disney on Jan. 30. It was so humiliating to train somebody else to take
over your job. I still cant grasp it.
Disney executives said that the layoffs were part of a reorganization, and that the
company opened more positions than it eliminated.
But the layoffs at Disney and at other companies, including the Southern California
Edison power utility, are raising new questions about how businesses and outsourcing
companies are using the temporary visas, known as H-1B, to place immigrants in
technology jobs in the United States. These visas are at the center of a fierce debate in
Congress over whether they complement American workers or displace them.
According to federal guidelines, the visas are intended for foreigners with advanced
science or computer skills to fill discrete positions when American workers with those
skills cannot be found. Their use, the guidelines say, should not adversely affect the
wages and working conditions of Americans. Because of legal loopholes, however, in
practice, companies do not have to recruit American workers first or guarantee that
Americans will not be displaced.
Too often, critics say, the visas are being used to bring in immigrants to do the work of
Americans for less money, with laid-off American workers having to train their
The program has created a highly lucrative business model of bringing in cheaper H-1B
workers to substitute for Americans, said Ronil Hira, a professor of public policy at
Howard University who studies visa programs and has testified before Congress about
H-1B visas.
A limited number of the visas, 85,000, are granted each year, and they are in high demand.
Technology giants like Microsoft, Facebook and Google repeatedly press for increases in
the annual quotas, saying there are not enough Americans with the skills they need.
Many American companies use H-1B visas to bring in small numbers of foreigners for
openings demanding specialized skills, according to official reports. But for years, most
top recipients of the visas have been outsourcing or consulting firms based in India, or
their American subsidiaries, which import workers for large contracts to take over entire
in-house technology units and to cut costs. The immigrants are employees of the
outsourcing companies.
In 2013, those firms including Infosys, Tata Consultancy Services and HCL America,
the company hired by Disney were six of the top 10 companies granted H-1Bs, with
each one receiving more than 1,000 visas.
H-1B immigrants work for less than American tech workers, Professor Hira said at a
hearing in March of the Senate Judiciary Committee, because of weaknesses in wage

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

regulations. The savings have been 25 percent to 49 percent in recent cases, he told
In a letter in April to top federal authorities in charge of immigration, a bipartisan group
of senators called for an investigation of recent H-1B-driven layoffs, saying, Their
frequency seems to have increased dramatically in the past year alone.
Last year, Southern California Edison began 540 technology layoffs while hiring two
Indian outsourcing firms for much of the work. Three Americans who had lost jobs told
Senate lawmakers that many of those being laid off had to teach immigrants to perform
their functions.
In a statement, the utility said the layoffs were a difficult business decision, part of a
plan to focus on making significant, strategic changes that can benefit our customers.
It noted that some workers hired by the outsourcing firms were Americans.
Fossil, a fashion watchmaker, said it would lay off more than 100 technology employees
in Texas this year, transferring the work to Infosys. The company is planning knowledge
sharing between the laid-off employees and about 25 new Infosys workers, including
immigrants, who will take jobs in Dallas. Fossil is outsourcing tech services to be more
current and nimble and reduce costs when possible, it said in a statement.
Among 350 tech workers laid off in 2013 after a merger at Northeast Utilities, an East
Coast power company, many had trained H-1B immigrants to do their jobs, several of
those workers reported confidentially to lawmakers. They said that as part of their
severance packages, they had to sign agreements not to criticize the company publicly.
In Orlando, Disney executives said the reorganization resulting in the layoffs was meant
to allow technology operations to focus on producing more innovations. They said that
over all, the company had a net gain of 70 tech jobs.
Disney has created almost 30,000 new jobs in the U.S. over the past decade, said Kim
Prunty, a Disney spokeswoman, adding that the company expected its contractors to
comply with all immigration laws.
The tech workers laid off were a tiny fraction of Disneys cast members, as the
entertainment conglomerate calls its theme park workers, who number 74,000 in the
Orlando area. Employees who lost jobs were allowed a three-month transition with
rsum coaching to help them seek other positions in the company, Disney executives
said. Of those laid off, 120 took new jobs at Disney, and about 40 retired or left the
company before the end of the transition period, while about 90 did not find new Disney
jobs, executives said.
Since June 30, 2011, there are nearly 41,000 Microsoft employees in Washington State. Nearly
half are H-1B foreign workers with up to 4,000 new H-1B workers arriving every year and staying
for 6 years. Of the remaining 20,000 U.S. workers, only 1,000 are actually from the State of
H1B Visa Sponsor
Infosys Limited

H1B Visas Issued from 2011 to 2013


White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

Deloitte Consulting
Larsen Toubro Infotech
Ernst Young
Deloitte Touche
JPMorgan Chase
Amazon com
Infosys Technologies
Fujitsu Lab of America
Hewlett Packard
Goldman Sachs


This is just a few corporations over the last 3 years who have utilized the visa program. There are
many more.
If we are going to honor our commitment to the middle class, we have to reflect that
intention in our public policy, Nancy Pelosi, 2013
If someone makes $10.10 an hour then their annual salary is just over $21,000 a year. This does
not put anyone in the middle class. $21,000 per annum would not qualify anyone for the middle
class 25 years ago, let alone in 2013. Politicians lower the bottom end of what they consider
middle class in order to convince everyone that the middle class is strong. In reality, it is weak
and shrinking. At $21,000 a year, there is no way possible to afford rent, a car, food, and utilities,
especially in a household with more than one person.
Today the path of total dictatorship in the United States can be laid by strictly legal
means, unseen and unheard by the Congress, the President, or the people. Outwardly we
have a Constitutional government. We have operating within our government and
political system, another body representing another form of government a bureaucratic
elite. - Senator William Jenner, 1954
GM announces cars to be built in China, after taxpayer bailout
This month, GM announced that the Chinese government gave the car maker approval to build
a new $1.3 billion plant in the Peoples Republic. GM claims it intends to take advantage of
the emerging luxury car market in the communist nation.
In the next century, nations as we know it will be obsolete; all states will recognize a
single, global authority. National sovereignty wasnt such a great idea after all. Strobe
Talbot, Deputy Secretary of State, July l992

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and


Example of Outsourcing
Nike, Inc. Revenue Performance



$20.86B $24.10B


Profile of Nike, Inc. Contract Factories Globally

East, Africa
North Asia
South Asia




With a struggling economy and people getting poorer, Nike managed to increase their sales from
2011 to 2012 by almost $4 billion dollars. Yes, that is billions, not millions. Their 2012 revenues
were $24.1 billion and in 2013, $25.5 billion.
With the tax loopholes created for the corporations, Nike was able to reduce their tax liability
from $24.1 billion $2.98 billion in which $325 million was from domestic earnings. Of that $325
million, they were able to defer $50,000,000 ($50 million). Nike has nearly 1,000 factories around
the world. Only a handful are in the United States. When discussing plants and offices in the
Americas, we are referring to those in Mexico and South America.
Intel, one of the nations largest technology corporations, has delivered a stern
message to their workers: Youre not good enough
Enjoy your IPOD and IPAD
Most of Apples labor force is in China. Of the 70 million iPhones, 30 million iPads and 59 million
other products Apple sold in 2013, none were produced in the United States. Apple has around
43,000 employees in the USA of which a majority are there to sell their product. Low income
jobs. But they do contract out around 700,000 jobs that include engineering and assembling these
products. Those 700,000 jobs are in China in which because of slave wages that are allowed by
the Chinese government compared to the inflated cost of their products, Apple earned over
$400,000 in profit per employee. NONE of that stimulated the American economy and considering
the cost of these products, most Americans financed these products and paid even more for these
products. Apple paid NO taxes on those 700,000 employees! NONE!


White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and


Athlete Privilege
How many athletes break laws and never do time? Especially in the NFL and College Football.
Is that not privilege? If most of these athletes breaking the law are Black, does that imply some
form of Black privilege exists? But if Black privilege existed, would the incarceration rate of
Blacks kind of speak to the opposite?
No, there is not a Black privilege either! The Blacks whom happen to get away with the
crimes they committed are in part for two reasons. One, damage control. The .001 percent who
own the Media certainly dont want their reputation tainted, they dont want their advertising of
apparel etc. impacted and they dont want ticket sales to drop. All of these would impact the .001
percent financially. So they use the control of their Media to defuse the problem, do everything
they can to make the criminal look as innocent as possible. Hundreds of Black athletes from
college to pro sports have been arrested over the last 10 years and almost none of them have done
jail time and if they have, theyve been let back into the league.
This is not Black privilege. This is wealth privilege, not wealth as in these athletes are ultrawealthy, but in that they are an investment and the .001 percent dont like losing money on their
investments! Eventually you should see that in reality, the only privilege that exists in the world is
in fact, wealth privilege. If you are wealthy or an investment in which wealth can be extracted,
you will be taken care of. If you are deemed a financial risk, you will be cut loose!

The Answer to the Question

So, the answer to the question, what is White privilege has been answered. Not directly and not
in one sentence either.
The White privilege movement is a multi-headed hydra!
The most important factor in the white privilege movement is to mask the horrid state of the
economy. To mask the transfer of wealth from the poor and middle class to the .001 percent. To
mask what illegal immigrations has and is doing to the country, the culture, and to the economy.
To mask what Free Trade, insourcing and the outsourcing of millions upon millions of middle
class jobs has done to the country and to the middle class which due to percentages has impacted
the White population the greatest. To mask the de-industrialization of the West and the effects of
that de-industrialization! To mask them destroying the American identity, culture, and even
They are trying to destroy the middle class and thus the racial group most impacted directly by
this is the White population. It is also destroying the minority population because of the
trickledown effect. Those that thought trickledown economics where the wealth was extracted
from the rich and made it down to the middle and lower classes have been punked! But in order
to distract everyone from noticing the de-industrialization of the West from a Globalism
perspective or more, to disguise this as an intentional attack on the middle class, they redirect
the problem to their advantage.
They promote White privilege.
Why do you think #blacklivesmatter, the gay agenda, or the Confederate flag are getting so much
attention? For those that buy into these corporate propaganda efforts then turn around and cry

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

about racism and persecution, you arent getting it. The same people who control the
#blacklivesmatter movement, the gay pride and marriage push, and the Confederate flag being
racist are the same people who control the entire banking system, corporations, the economy, and
Congress. The same people who are demonizing the White police officers and making out the
victims to be innocent babies who did nothing wrong are the same people who own the Media,
corporations, oil companies, and the banks. Do you really think they care about #blacklivesmatter
or Blacks? Do you really think they care about the Confederate Flag?
Guess who created the Black Caucus, the NAACP, and the ACLU? White people!
Joe Biden, Hillary Clinton, and Barack Obama all ran on the political platform of traditional
marriage. They didnt flip their stance because they had a revelation or all of a sudden believe in
equality, they were told what to do and so they did it.
Bill Clinton and Al Gores 1992 Presidential theme was a Confederate Flag. Was it racist then?
If so, why did so many minorities vote for Clinton when he ran with the Confederate Flag in the
background? The Confederate Flag removal is about removing American history. That is it!
The introduction of White privilege is mainly a smoke and mirror tactic. They know they are
destroying the global economy and de-industrializing the West intentionally but they dont want
you to know it. Instead, they can achieve the same result with the consent of minorities because
they promote racism and White guilt. Instead of most people seeing it for what it is, as an indicator
of the terrible global economy and lack of jobs, it appears to many as putting whitey in their
place. Many non-Whites and even the weaker minded Whites who suffer from White guilt are all
for this. The corporate owned school system and corporate owned colleges have been preaching
and teaching this to the point many actually believes this exists. The White guilt and minority
base think this is sticking it to the rich for some reason when all it is doing is sticking it to the same
people who are being manipulated and oppressed as they themselves are, the middle class. Its the
same group of people who gaze at the screen in a mindless zombie state when Obama and various
other politicians speak.
White privilege is also there to create division within the races and even divide Whites. White
privilege inserts a political agenda where the Media can create programs and debate, generate
higher ratings within the Media circles. Where it can publish magazines and books and draw
viewership. White privilege conditions young impressionable minds to feel guilty about their
position in life with the goal of controlling them via that emotion.
White privilege exists so the masses dont focus on the helpless White middle class but instead
focus on White people instead of the banks and corporations who make trillions of dollars off of
open borders, free trade, while avoiding paying 100s of billions in taxes annually.

Wealth Privilege
White privilege exists to hide the true privilege which is wealth privilege. Wealth privilege
dominates society. Wealth privilege is never having to pay interest on any type of loan. Wealth
privilege is having access to the best schooling. Wealth privilege is having access to the best
healthcare and doctors. Wealth privilege is being able to manipulate government to pass laws that
help the rich avoid taxes thus making them richer. Wealth privilege is being able to commit almost
any crime imaginable from murder to raping young children and having it swept under the rug
with no punishment. Wealth privilege is owning and controlling the illegal drug and prostitution
underground and being able to traffic human beings using drug cartels. Wealth privilege is being

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

able to launder blood money in the tune of 100s of billions through the banking system and never
face consequences.
Want some examples? Here you go!
HSBC Judge Approves $1.9B Drug-Money Laundering Accord
Whistleblower: HSBC Still Laundering Money for Terrorists, Drug Cartels
How HSBC Bank Got Away With Money Laundering for Drug Cartels
Prison time? Felony record? Asset forfeiture? Not for drug trafficking executives of
banks that are too big to fail or jail.
Outrageous HSBC Settlement Proves the Drug War is a Joke
If you've ever been arrested on a drug charge, if you've ever spent even a day in jail for
having a stem of marijuana in your pocket or "drug paraphernalia" in your gym bag,
Assistant Attorney General and longtime Bill Clinton pal Lanny Breuer has a message for
you: Bite me.
Breuer this week signed off on a settlement deal with the British banking giant HSBC that
is the ultimate insult to every ordinary person who's ever had his life altered by a narcotics
charge. Despite the fact that HSBC admitted to laundering billions of dollars for Colombian
and Mexican drug cartels (among others) and violating a host of important banking laws
(from the Bank Secrecy Act to the Trading With the Enemy Act), Breuer and his Justice
Department elected not to pursue criminal prosecutions of the bank, opting instead for a
"record" financial settlement of $1.9 billion, which as one analyst noted is about five weeks
of income for the bank.
The banks' laundering transactions were so brazen that the NSA probably could have
spotted them from space. Breuer admitted that drug dealers would sometimes come to
HSBC's Mexican branches and "deposit hundreds of thousands of dollars in cash, in a
single day, into a single account, using boxes designed to fit the precise dimensions of the
teller windows."
This bears repeating: in order to more efficiently move as much illegal money as possible
into the "legitimate" banking institution HSBC, drug dealers specifically designed boxes
to fit through the bank's teller windows. Tony Montana's henchmen marching duffle-bags
of cash into the fictional "American City Bank" in Miami was actually subtler than what
the cartels were doing when they washed their cash through one of Britain's most storied
financial institutions.
Federal and state authorities have chosen not to indict HSBC, the London-based bank, on
charges of vast and prolonged money laundering, for fear that criminal prosecution would
topple the bank and, in the process, endanger the financial system.


White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

Report: HSBC allowed money laundering that likely funded terror, drug
A "pervasively polluted" culture at HSBC allowed the bank to act as financier to clients
moving shadowy funds from the worlds most dangerous and secretive corners, including
Mexico, Iran, Saudi Arabia and Syria, according to a scathing U.S. Senate report issued on
The report which comes ahead of a Senate hearing on Tuesday, said large amounts of
Mexican drug money likely passed through the bank.
HSBC's U.S. division provided money and banking services to some banks in Saudi Arabia
and Bangladesh believed to have helped fund al-Qaida and other terrorist groups, according
to an Al-Jazeera story on the report.
While the big British bank's problems have been known for nearly a decade, the Senate
probe detailed just how sweeping the problems have been, both at the bank and at the Office
of the Comptroller of the Currency, a top U.S. bank regulator which the report said failed
to properly monitor HSBC.
HBSC Ownership


Fisher Asset Management, LLC

Dimensional Fund Advisors, Inc.
Fidelity Management and Research Company
Schafer Cullen Capital Management Inc.
Matthews International Cap Management LLc
Capital Research Global Investors
Wells Fargo Bank NA
Royal Bank Of Canada
Managed Account Advisors LLC
Bessemer Investment Management LLC
Northern Trust Investments, N.A.
Brandes Investment Partners & Co.
J. P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.


Money Laundering and The Drug Trade: The Role of the Banks
In the past few weeks, violence in the western Mexican state of Michoacn has been
rapidly escalating. The government's inability to deal with the powerful cartels has led to
citizens taking the law into their own hands -- by forming armed vigilante groups. The
bloodshed caused by this development has now led to the deployment of Mexican soldiers
into the region, which in turn has caused further civilian deaths.
The failure of both the vigilantes and the army to quell the cartel's carnage is a direct
result of the huge profits that the drug trade generates. Cartel leaders can continue hiring
and arming their combatants because it's worth the expenditure; the illegal drug trade
accounts for around 8 percent of all international trade. One of the primary reasons that
cartels retain their enormous power is that well-known and popular banks are supporting
their finances.

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

Bank of America, Western Union, and JP Morgan, are among the institutions allegedly
involved in the drug trade. Meanwhile, HSBC has admitted its laundering role, and
evaded criminal prosecution by paying a fine of almost $2 billion. The lack of
imprisonment of any bankers involved is indicative of the hypocritical nature of the drug
war; an individual selling a few grams of drugs can face decades in prison, while a group
of people that tacitly allow -- and profit from -- the trade of tons, escape incarceration.
The hypocrisy of the role that banks play in the drug trade is particularly disgraceful when
considering the recent system of marijuana regulation that was introduced in Colorado.
The state's legal marijuana business has proven to be highly lucrative, with $5 million
made in the first week of 2014. However, at present, marijuana businesses cannot access
essential banking services. Despite liberalization of marijuana laws in Colorado and
elsewhere, the plant remains illegal at the federal level; this means that banks won't open
accounts for marijuana businesses, so the majority of their transactions are cash-only. The
movement of such large amounts of cash can be highly dangerous for business owners,
and troublesome for both customers and tax collectors.
Earlier this week, several Colorado legislators made a bipartisan appeal to the federal
government, requesting clear guidelines for marijuana businesses' regulation within the
banking sector. Banks have avoided allowing these new companies to open accounts,
ironically, for the fear of being penalized, or implicated as launderers. Essentially, the
current banking system implicitly tolerates the handling of violent cartels' illegal assets,
but blocks the legal and legitimate business of the Coloradan marijuana industry.
The role that banks have played in the global drug trade has been partly responsible for
widespread carnage and countless civilian deaths, particularly in Mexico. Now, as legal
marijuana industries begin to emerge, and the war on drugs seems to slowly decelerate,
the banking sector has an opportunity to redeem itself in this respect. Banks cannot undo
the wrongs of the past, but they can create a fairer future for regulated trade within this
expanding and legal new industry, and without supporting lawlessness.
Wells Fargo: Your Neighborhood Mega-Money Laundering, Drug War
Profiteering, Prison-Industry Enlarging Bank
Just recently, in late July, Wells Fargo surpassed the Industrial and Commercial Bank of
China (ICBC) as the worlds largest bank by market capitalization. This followed Wells
Fargo reporting a 19% increase in profits over the second quarter as the bank has been
busy consolidating the housing market while other big banks have retreated from it. Wells
Fargo had amassed a share of almost 40% of the U.S. mortgage market by early 2013.
Now, let's put this in context with the company's other recent activities.
Wells Fargo, which acquired Wachovia in the wake of the financial crisis, controlled
roughly 28.8% of all home loans issued across the United States in 2012, compared to
11.2% of the market it controlled in 2007, just before the housing implosion. In 2012, the
bank paid a $175 million settlement following revelations that mortgage brokers
working with Wells Fargo had charged higher fees and rates to more than 30,000 minority
borrowers across the country than they had to white borrowers who posed the same credit


White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

In the settlement, the worlds largest bank admitted no wrongdoing, noting in a press
release that the bank simply wanted to avoid a long and costly legal fight. Then, in
2013, Wells Fargo agreed to a further $42 million settlement because it neglected the
maintenance and marketing of foreclosed homes in black and Latino neighborhoods
across the country. Again, of course, the bank admitted no wrongdoing.
But that's just the tip of things. A civil mortgage fraud suit was filed against Wells Fargo
in late 2012 for hundreds of millions of dollars in damages over reckless mortgage loans
made by the bank for over a decade in the lead-up to the financial crisis. Even in light of
the massive settlement in 2012 over mortgage fraud, which simultaneously forced big
banks to adhere to new rules regarding the mortgage market, it was found that both Bank
of America and Wells Fargo had flagrantly violated those obligations, increasing
foreclosure risks for Americans. Also, this past May, Wells Fargo agreed to pay a $105
million settlement in a fraud case brought by Orange County, which also implicated Bank
of New York Mellon to the tune of a $114 million settlement.
It gets better. In 2010, Wachovia which was purchased by Wells Fargo in 2008 paid
a settlement of $160 million for laundering over $100 million in drug money for Mexican
and Colombian drug cartels. Further, the bank admitted that it had failed to apply the
proper anti-laundering strictures regarding the banks handling of $378.4 billion in
currency exchanges with Mexico between 2004 and 2007. A federal prosecutor
commented, Wachovias blatant disregard for our banking laws gave international
cocaine cartels a virtual carte blanche to finance their operations, as tens of thousands
of Mexicans were killed in an exponentially violent drug war.
Thus, in the aftermath of the financial crisis, not only did the big banks receive sprawling
government bailouts (Wells Fargo got $25 billion from the U.S. government), but
according to the UN, proceeds pouring in from the global drug trade ultimately helped
keep Wells Fargo and others afloat as the only liquid investment capital available to
them during the crisis. But Wells Fargo didn't just profit from laundering money for major
drug cartels -- it also profited, and continues to profit, at the other end of the drug war as
a major investor in the prison-industrial complex, specifically with heavy investments in
the GEO Group, the second largest private prison company in the United States.
As the largest bank in the world, Wells Fargo is deeply connected with some of the most
powerful U.S. and international institutions to ensure that no matter how many crimes it
commits -- fraud, illegal foreclosures, money laundering, you name it -- it will continue
to consolidate markets, grow larger and presumably get away with its criminal activities
for relatively small fines. The Global Power Project examined a total of 26 individuals
on the executive committee and board of directors at Wells Fargo to assess their
institutional affiliations. The most represented institutions (with three individual
affiliations each) are the Council on Foreign Relations and PricewaterhouseCoopers
(PwC), followed by Harvard, Citigroup, Chevron, the Financial Services Roundtable and
Target Corporation (with two individual affiliations each).
Meet the Elites
Elaine L. Chao, who sits on the board of Wells Fargo, was formerly U.S. Secretary of
Labor in the George W. Bush administration, from 2001 to 2009. She was a Distinguished
Fellow of the Heritage Foundation from 1996 to 2001 and has resumed that position since
2009. She was also the President and CEO of the United Way of America from 1992 to
1996, Director of the Peace Corps from 1991 to 1992, and Deputy Secretary of the U.S.

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

Department of Transportation from 1989 to 1991. Chao is a member of the board of
directors of Dole Food Company, News Corporation, Protective Life Corporation, the
Institute of Politics of Harvard Kennedy School of Government, and a member of Harvard
Business School Board of Deans Advisors, as well as a member of the Council on
Foreign Relations.
John S. Chen, also on the board of Wells Fargo, is a senior adviser to Silver Lake Partners,
a director of the Walt Disney Company, a member of the Board of Overseers Emeriti of
the Watson Institute for International Studies at Brown University, a former member of
the Presidents Export Council, a member of the board of trustees of the Brookings
Institution, chairman of the U.S.-China Policy Advisory Roundtable at the Center for
Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), and a member of the Council on Foreign
Wells Fargo board member Enrique Hernandez, Jr. is the president and CEO of Inter-Con
Security Systems, and sits on the boards of Chevron, Nordstrom, McDonalds
Corporation, and the board of trustees of the University of Notre Dame. He is a member
of the Harvard College Visiting and Harvard University Resources Committees and is a
member of the John Randolph Haynes and Dora Haynes Foundation.
Federico F. Pea, on the Wells Fargo board, was a U.S. Secretary of Transportation and
U.S. Secretary of Energy during the Clinton administration, and previously a member of
the Colorado House of Representatives and a former mayor of Denver. More recently, he
has been a senior adviser to Vestar Capital Partners, on the board of Sonic Corporation
and a member of the Diversity Advisory Board of Toyota North America. A former
national board member of the Obama-Biden Transition Team, Pea is also former
National Co-Chair of Obama For America and currently a member of the Council on
Foreign Relations.
John G. Stumpf, the president and CEO of Wells Fargo, is a member of the board of
directors of the Financial Services Forum and chairman of the board of the Financial
Services Roundtable, and is also on the boards of Target Corporation, Chevron, and on
the board of trustees of the San Francisco Museum of Modern Art.
For a mega-money laundering, drug war profiteering, prison-industry enlarging global
bank like Wells Fargo, the evidence is obvious: it helps to have affiliations with
individuals and institutions that make up the U.S. and increasingly the international power
elite. Like the other big banks, Wells Fargo is too big to fail, too big to jail, too criminal
to control -- and too tumorous to tolerate.
Wachovia Bank Laundered Money for Latin American Drug Cartel
Between 2004 and 2007, Wachovia Bank handled funds totaling $378.4 billion for
Mexican currency-exchange houses acting on behalf of drug cartels. The transactions
amount to the largest violation of the Bank Secrecy Act, an anti-money-laundering law,
in US history. This case is not exceptional; Wachovia is just one of several US and
European banks that drug cartels have used to launder money.
FBI: Drug Cartels Use Bank of America to Launder Money


White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

he brother of the alleged leader of a Mexican cocaine-trafficking cartel used Bank of
America Corp. accounts to invest the organizations drug proceeds in U.S. racehorses, a
FBI agent said.
Jose Trevino-Morales, one of 14 people indicted by a federal grand jury in Texas on June
12, used a personal account and a business account under the name of Tremor Enterprises
LLC to buy and sell horses using money generated from cocaine trafficking, extortion
and bribery, Jason Preece, a special agent with the Federal Bureau of Investigation, said
in a June 11 sworn statement filed in federal court in Dallas.
The ultimate goal of this money laundering operation was to provide Jose Trevino with
apparent legitimate assets purchased and maintained by illegally obtained money, Preece
said. Bank of America isnt accused of any wrongdoing in the agents statement.
Details of the transactions were revealed in a probe of the Los Zetas drug cartel, which
according to the filing, funnels thousands of kilograms of cocaine into the U.S. each year.
Los Zetas is the biggest drug cartel in Mexico, in geographical presence, and controls 11
states in the country, generating millions of dollars of revenue, Preece said in the
statement filed in a bid to gain a search warrant for Trevinos property.
Global banks are the financial services wing of the drug cartel
How a big US bank laundered billions from Mexico's murderous drug gangs
On 10 April 2006, a DC-9 jet landed in the port city of Ciudad del Carmen, on the Gulf
of Mexico, as the sun was setting. Mexican soldiers, waiting to intercept it, found 128
cases packed with 5.7 tons of cocaine, valued at $100m. But something else more
important and far-reaching was discovered in the paper trail behind the purchase of the
plane by the Sinaloa narco-trafficking cartel.
During a 22-month investigation by agents from the US Drug Enforcement
Administration, the Internal Revenue Service and others, it emerged that the cocaine
smugglers had bought the plane with money they had laundered through one of the
biggest banks in the United States: Wachovia, now part of the giant Wells Fargo.
The authorities uncovered billions of dollars in wire transfers, traveller's cheques and cash
shipments through Mexican exchanges into Wachovia accounts. Wachovia was put under
immediate investigation for failing to maintain an effective anti-money laundering
programme. Of special significance was that the period concerned began in 2004, which
coincided with the first escalation of violence along the US-Mexico border that ignited
the current drugs war.
Criminal proceedings were brought against Wachovia, though not against any individual,
but the case never came to court. In March 2010, Wachovia settled the biggest action
brought under the US bank secrecy act, through the US district court in Miami. Now that
the year's "deferred prosecution" has expired, the bank is in effect in the clear. It paid
federal authorities $110m in forfeiture, for allowing transactions later proved to be
connected to drug smuggling, and incurred a $50m fine for failing to monitor cash used
to ship 22 tons of cocaine.

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

More shocking, and more important, the bank was sanctioned for failing to apply the
proper anti-laundering strictures to the transfer of $378.4bn a sum equivalent to onethird of Mexico's gross national product into dollar accounts from so-called casas de
cambio (CDCs) in Mexico, currency exchange houses with which the bank did business.
"Wachovia's blatant disregard for our banking laws gave international cocaine cartels a
virtual carte blanche to finance their operations," said Jeffrey Sloman, the federal
prosecutor. Yet the total fine was less than 2% of the bank's $12.3bn profit for 2009. On
24 March 2010, Wells Fargo stock traded at $30.86 up 1% on the week of the court
The conclusion to the case was only the tip of an iceberg, demonstrating the role of the
"legal" banking sector in swilling hundreds of billions of dollars the blood money from
the murderous drug trade in Mexico and other places in the world around their global
operations, now bailed out by the taxpayer.
At the height of the 2008 banking crisis, Antonio Maria Costa, then head of the United
Nations office on drugs and crime, said he had evidence to suggest the proceeds from
drugs and crime were "the only liquid investment capital" available to banks on the brink
of collapse. "Inter-bank loans were funded by money that originated from the drugs
trade," he said. "There were signs that some banks were rescued that way."
Wachovia was acquired by Wells Fargo during the 2008 crash, just as Wells Fargo
became a beneficiary of $25bn in taxpayers' money. Wachovia's prosecutors were clear,
however, that there was no suggestion Wells Fargo had behaved improperly; it had cooperated fully with the investigation. Mexico is the US's third largest international trading
partner and Wachovia was understandably interested in this volume of legitimate trade.
Jos Luis Marmolejo, who prosecuted those running one of the casas de cambio at the
Mexican end, said: "Wachovia handled all the transfers. They never reported any as
"As early as 2004, Wachovia understood the risk," the bank admitted in the statement of
settlement with the federal government, but, "despite these warnings, Wachovia remained
in the business". There is, of course, the legitimate use of CDCs as a way into the Hispanic
market. In 2005 the World Bank said that Mexico was receiving $8.1bn in remittances.
During research into the Wachovia Mexican case, the Observer obtained documents
previously provided to financial regulators. It emerged that the alarm that was ignored
came from, among other places, London, as a result of the diligence of one of the most
important whistleblowers of our time. A man who, in a series of interviews with the
Observer, adds detail to the documents, laying bare the story of how Wachovia was at the
centre of one of the world's biggest money-laundering operations.
Martin Woods, a Liverpudlian in his mid-40s, joined the London office of Wachovia
Bank in February 2005 as a senior anti-money laundering officer. He had previously
served with the Metropolitan police drug squad. As a detective he joined the moneylaundering investigation team of the National Crime Squad, where he worked on the
British end of the Bank of New York money-laundering scandal in the late 1990s.
Woods talks like a police officer in the best sense of the word: punctilious, exact, with
a roguish humour, but moral at the core. He was an ideal appointment for any bank eager
to operate a diligent and effective risk management policy against the lucrative scourge
of high finance: laundering, knowing or otherwise, the vast proceeds of criminality, taxevasion, and dealing in arms and drugs.

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

Woods had a police officer's eye and a police officer's instincts not those of a banker.
And this influenced not only his methods, but his mentality. "I think that a lot of things
matter more than money and that marks you out in a culture which appears to prevail
in many of the banks in the world," he says.
Woods was set apart by his modus operandi. His speciality, he explains, was his
application of a "know your client", or KYC, policing strategy to identifying dirty money.
"KYC is a fundamental approach to anti-money laundering, going after tax evasion or
counter-terrorist financing. Who are your clients? Is the documentation right? Good,
responsible banking involved always knowing your customer and it still does."
When he looked at Wachovia, the first thing Woods noticed was a deficiency in KYC
information. And among his first reports to his superiors at the bank's headquarters in
Charlotte, North Carolina, were observations on a shortfall in KYC at Wachovia's
operation in London, which he set about correcting, while at the same time implementing
what was known as an enhanced transaction monitoring programme, gathering more
information on clients whose money came through the bank's offices in the City, in
sterling or euros. By August 2006, Woods had identified a number of suspicious
transactions relating to casas de cambio customers in Mexico.
Primarily, these involved deposits of traveller's cheques in euros. They had sequential
numbers and deposited larger amounts of money than any innocent travelling person
would need, with inadequate or no KYC information on them and what seemed to a
trained eye to be dubious signatures. "It was basic work," he says. "They didn't answer
the obvious questions: 'Is the transaction real, or does it look synthetic? Does the
traveller's cheque meet the protocols? Is it all there, and if not, why not?'"
Woods discussed the matter with Wachovia's global head of anti-money laundering for
correspondent banking, who believed the cheques could signify tax evasion. He then
undertook what banks call a "look back" at previous transactions and saw fit to submit a
series of SARs, or suspicious activity reports, to the authorities in the UK and his
superiors in Charlotte, urging the blocking of named parties and large series of
sequentially numbered traveller's cheques from Mexico. He issued a number of SARs in
2006, of which 50 related to the casas de cambio in Mexico. To his amazement, the
response from Wachovia's Miami office, the centre for Latin American business, was
anything but supportive he felt it was quite the reverse.
As it turned out, however, Woods was on the right track. Wachovia's business in Mexico
was coming under closer and closer scrutiny by US federal law enforcement. Wachovia
was issued with a number of subpoenas for information on its Mexican operation. Woods
has subsequently been informed that Wachovia had six or seven thousand subpoenas. He
says this was "An absurd number. So at what point does someone at the highest level not
get the feeling that something is very, very wrong?"
In April and May 2007, Wachovia as a result of increasing interest and pressure from
the US attorney's office began to close its relationship with some of the casas de cambio.
But rather than launch an internal investigation into Woods's alerts over Mexico, Woods
claims Wachovia hung its own money-laundering expert out to dry. The records show
that during 2007 Woods "continued to submit more SARs related to the casas de cambio".
In July 2007, all of Wachovia's remaining 10 Mexican casa de cambio clients operating
through London suddenly stopped doing so. Later in 2007, after the investigation of

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

Wachovia was reported in the US financial media, the bank decided to end its remaining
relationships with the Mexican casas de cambio globally. By this time, Woods says, he
found his personal situation within the bank untenable; while the bank acted on one level
to protect itself from the federal investigation into its shortcomings, on another, it rounded
on the man who had been among the first to spot them.
On 16 June Woods was told by Wachovia's head of compliance that his latest SAR need
not have been filed, that he had no legal requirement to investigate an overseas case and
no right of access to documents held overseas from Britain, even if they were held by
Woods's life went into freefall. He went to hospital with a prolapsed disc, reported sick
and was told by the bank that he not done so in the appropriate manner, as directed by the
employees' handbook. He was off work for three weeks, returning in August 2007 to find
a letter from the bank's compliance managing director, which was unrelenting in its tone
and words of warning.
The letter addressed itself to what the manager called "specific examples of your failure
to perform at an acceptable standard". Woods, on the edge of a breakdown, was put on
sick leave by his GP; he was later given psychiatric treatment, enrolled on a stress
management course and put on medication.
Late in 2007, Woods attended a function at Scotland Yard where colleagues from the US
were being entertained. There, he sought out a representative of the Drug Enforcement
Administration and told him about the casas de cambio, the SARs and his employer's
reaction. The Federal Reserve and officials of the office of comptroller of currency in
Washington DC then "spent a lot of time examining the SARs" that had been sent by
Woods to Charlotte from London.
"They got back in touch with me a while afterwards and we began to put the pieces of the
jigsaw together," says Woods. What they found was as Costa says the tip of the
iceberg of what was happening to drug money in the banking industry, but at least it was
visible and it had a name: Wachovia.
In June 2005, the DEA, the criminal division of the Internal Revenue Service and the US
attorney's office in southern Florida began investigating wire transfers from Mexico to
the US. They were traced back to correspondent bank accounts held by casas de cambio
at Wachovia. The CDC accounts were supervised and managed by a business unit of
Wachovia in the bank's Miami offices.
"Through CDCs," said the court document, "persons in Mexico can use hard currency
and wire transfer the value of that currency to US bank accounts to purchase items in
the United States or other countries. The nature of the CDC business allows money
launderers the opportunity to move drug dollars that are in Mexico into CDCs and
ultimately into the US banking system.
"On numerous occasions," say the court papers, "monies were deposited into a CDC by
a drug-trafficking organisation. Using false identities, the CDC then wired that money
through its Wachovia correspondent bank accounts for the purchase of airplanes for drugtrafficking organisations." The court settlement of 2010 would detail that "nearly $13m
went through correspondent bank accounts at Wachovia for the purchase of aircraft to be
used in the illegal narcotics trade. From these aircraft, more than 20,000kg of cocaine
were seized."


White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

All this occurred despite the fact that Wachovia's office was in Miami, designated by the
US government as a "high-intensity money laundering and related financial crime area",
and a "high-intensity drug trafficking area". Since the drug cartel war began in 2005,
Mexico had been designated a high-risk source of money laundering.
"As early as 2004," the court settlement would read, "Wachovia understood the risk that
was associated with doing business with the Mexican CDCs. Wachovia was aware of the
general industry warnings. As early as July 2005, Wachovia was aware that other large
US banks were exiting the CDC business based on [anti-money laundering] concerns
despite these warnings, Wachovia remained in business."
On 16 March 2010, Douglas Edwards, senior vice-president of Wachovia Bank, put his
signature to page 10 of a 25-page settlement, in which the bank admitted its role as
outlined by the prosecutors. On page 11, he signed again, as senior vice-president of
Wells Fargo. The documents show Wachovia providing three services to 22 CDCs in
Mexico: wire transfers, a "bulk cash service" and a "pouch deposit service", to accept
"deposit items drawn on US banks, eg cheques and traveller's cheques", as spotted by
"For the time period of 1 May 2004 through 31 May 2007, Wachovia processed at least
$$373.6bn in CDCs, $4.7bn in bulk cash" a total of more than $378.3bn, a sum that
dwarfs the budgets debated by US state and UK local authorities to provide services to
The document gives a fascinating insight into how the laundering of drug money works.
It details how investigators "found readily identifiable evidence of red flags of large-scale
money laundering". There were "structured wire transfers" whereby "it was
commonplace in the CDC accounts for round-number wire transfers to be made on the
same day or in close succession, by the same wire senders, for the same account".
Over two days, 10 wire transfers by four individuals "went though Wachovia for deposit
into an aircraft broker's account. All of the transfers were in round numbers. None of the
individuals of business that wired money had any connection to the aircraft or the entity
that allegedly owned the aircraft. The investigation has further revealed that the identities
of the individuals who sent the money were false and that the business was a shell entity.
That plane was subsequently seized with approximately 2,000kg of cocaine on board."
Many of the sequentially numbered traveller's cheques, of the kind dealt with by Woods,
contained "unusual markings" or "lacked any legible signature". Also, "many of the CDCs
that used Wachovia's bulk cash service sent significantly more cash to Wachovia than
what Wachovia had expected. More specifically, many of the CDCs exceeded their
monthly activity by at least 50%."
Recognising these "red flags", the US attorney's office in Miami, the IRS and the DEA
began investigating Wachovia, later joined by FinCEN, one of the US Treasury's agencies
to fight money laundering, while the office of the comptroller of the currency carried out
a parallel investigation. The violations they found were, says the document, "serious and
systemic and allowed certain Wachovia customers to launder millions of dollars of
proceeds from the sale of illegal narcotics through Wachovia accounts over an extended
time period. The investigation has identified that at least $110m in drug proceeds were
funnelled through the CDC accounts held at Wachovia."
The settlement concludes by discussing Wachovia's "considerable co-operation and
remedial actions" since the prosecution was initiated, after the bank was bought by Wells

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

Fargo. "In consideration of Wachovia's remedial actions," concludes the prosecutor, "the
United States shall recommend to the court that prosecution of Wachovia on the
information filed be deferred for a period of 12 months."
But while the federal prosecution proceeded, Woods had remained out in the cold. On
Christmas Eve 2008, his lawyers filed tribunal proceedings against Wachovia for bullying
and detrimental treatment of a whistleblower. The case was settled in May 2009, by which
time Woods felt as though he was "the most toxic person in the bank". Wachovia agreed
to pay an undisclosed amount, in return for which Woods left the bank and said he would
not make public the terms of the settlement.
After years of tribulation, Woods was finally formally vindicated, though not by
Wachovia: a letter arrived from John Dugan, the comptroller of the currency in
Washington DC, dated 19 March 2010 three days after the settlement in Miami. Dugan
said he was "writing to personally recognise and express my appreciation for the role you
played in the actions brought against Wachovia Bank for violations of the bank secrecy
act Not only did the information that you provided facilitate our investigation, but you
demonstrated great personal courage and integrity by speaking up. Without the efforts of
individuals like you, actions such as the one taken against Wachovia would not be
The so-called "deferred prosecution" detailed in the Miami document is a form of
probation whereby if the bank abides by the law for a year, charges are dropped. So this
March the bank was in the clear. The week that the deferred prosecution expired, a
spokeswoman for Wells Fargo said the parent bank had no comment to make on the
documentation pertaining to Woods's case, or his allegations. She added that there was
no comment on Sloman's remarks to the court; a provision in the settlement stipulated
Wachovia was not allowed to issue public statements that contradicted it.
But the settlement leaves a sour taste in many mouths and certainly in Woods's. The
deferred prosecution is part of this "cop-out all round", he says. "The regulatory
authorities do not have to spend any more time on it, and they don't have to push it as far
as a criminal trial. They just issue criminal proceedings, and settle. The law enforcement
people do what they are supposed to do, but what's the point? All those people dealing
with all that money from drug-trafficking and murder, and no one goes to jail?"
One of the foremost figures in the training of anti-money laundering officers is Robert
Mazur, lead infiltrator for US law enforcement of the Colombian Medelln cartel during
the epic prosecution and collapse of the BCCI banking business in 1991 (his story was
made famous by his memoir, The Infiltrator, which became a movie).
Mazur, whose firm Chase and Associates works closely with law enforcement agencies
and trains officers for bank anti-money laundering, cast a keen eye over the case against
Wachovia, and he says now that "the only thing that will make the banks properly vigilant
to what is happening is when they hear the rattle of handcuffs in the boardroom".
Mazur said that "a lot of the law enforcement people were disappointed to see a
settlement" between the administration and Wachovia. "But I know there were external
circumstances that worked to Wachovia's benefit, not least that the US banking system
was on the edge of collapse."
What concerns Mazur is that what law enforcement agencies and politicians hope to
achieve against the cartels is limited, and falls short of the obvious attack the US could
make in its war on drugs: go after the money. "We're thinking way too small," Mazur

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

says. "I train law enforcement officers, thousands of them every year, and they say to me
that if they tried to do half of what I did, they'd be arrested. But I tell them: 'You got to
think big. The headlines you will be reading in seven years' time will be the result of the
work you begin now.' With BCCI, we had to spend two years setting it up, two years
doing undercover work, and another two years getting it to trial. If they want to do
something big, like go after the money, that's how long it takes."
But Mazur warns: "If you look at the career ladders of law enforcement, there's no
incentive to go after the big money. People move every two to three years. The DEA is
focused on drug trafficking rather than money laundering. You get a quicker result that
way they want to get the traffickers and seize their assets. But this is like treating a sick
plant by cutting off a few branches it just grows new ones. Going after the big money
is cutting down the plant it's a harder door to knock on, it's a longer haul, and it won't
get you the short-term riches."
The office of the comptroller of the currency is still examining whether individuals in
Wachovia are criminally liable. Sources at FinCEN say that a so-called "look-back" is in
process, as directed by the settlement and agreed to by Wachovia, into the $378.4bn that
was not directly associated with the aircraft purchases and cocaine hauls, but neither was
it subject to the proper anti-laundering checks. A FinCEN source says that $20bn already
examined appears to have "suspicious origins". But this is just the beginning.
Antonio Maria Costa, who was executive director of the UN's office on drugs and crime
from May 2002 to August 2010, charts the history of the contamination of the global
banking industry by drug and criminal money since his first initiatives to try to curb it
from the European commission during the 1990s. "The connection between organised
crime and financial institutions started in the late 1970s, early 1980s," he says, "when the
mafia became globalised."
Until then, criminal money had circulated largely in cash, with the authorities making the
occasional, spectacular "sting" or haul. During Costa's time as director for economics and
finance at the EC in Brussels, from 1987, inroads were made against penetration of banks
by criminal laundering, and "criminal money started moving back to cash, out of the
financial institutions and banks. Then two things happened: the financial crisis in Russia,
after the emergence of the Russian mafia, and the crises of 2003 and 2007-08.
"With these crises," says Costa, "the banking sector was short of liquidity, the banks
exposed themselves to the criminal syndicates, who had cash in hand."
Costa questions the readiness of governments and their regulatory structures to challenge
this large-scale corruption of the global economy: "Government regulators showed what
they were capable of when the issue suddenly changed to laundering money for terrorism
on that, they suddenly became serious and changed their attitude."
Hardly surprising, then, that Wachovia does not appear to be the end of the line. In August
2010, it emerged in quarterly disclosures by HSBC that the US justice department was
seeking to fine it for anti-money laundering compliance problems reported to include
dealings with Mexico.
"Wachovia had my rsum, they knew who I was," says Woods. "But they did not want
to know their attitude was, 'Why are you doing this?' They should have been on my
side, because they were compliance people, not commercial people. But really they were


White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

commercial people all along. We're talking about hundreds of millions of dollars. This is
the biggest money-laundering scandal of our time.
"These are the proceeds of murder and misery in Mexico, and of drugs sold around the
world," he says. "All the law enforcement people wanted to see this come to trial. But no
one goes to jail. "What does the settlement do to fight the cartels? Nothing it doesn't
make the job of law enforcement easier and it encourages the cartels and anyone who
wants to make money by laundering their blood dollars. Where's the risk? There is none.
"Is it in the interest of the American people to encourage both the drug cartels and the
banks in this way? Is it in the interest of the Mexican people? It's simple: if you don't see
the correlation between the money laundering by banks and the 30,000 people killed in
Mexico, you're missing the point."
Woods feels unable to rest on his laurels. He tours the world for a consultancy he now
runs, Hermes Forensic Solutions, counselling and speaking to banks on the dangers of
laundering criminal money, and how to spot and stop it. "New York and London," says
Woods, "have become the world's two biggest laundries of criminal and drug money, and
offshore tax havens. Not the Cayman Islands, not the Isle of Man or Jersey. The big
laundering is right through the City of London and Wall Street.
"After the Wachovia case, no one in the regulatory community has sat down with me and
asked, 'What happened?' or 'What can we do to avoid this happening to other banks?'
They are not interested. They are the same people who attack the whistleblowers and this
is a position the [British] Financial Services Authority at least has adopted on legal
advice: it has been advised that the confidentiality of banking and bankers takes primacy
over the public information disclosure act. That is how the priorities work: secrecy first,
public interest second.
"Meanwhile, the drug industry has two products: money and suffering. On one hand, you
have massive profits and enrichment. On the other, you have massive suffering, misery
and death. You cannot separate one from the other.
"What happened at Wachovia was symptomatic of the failure of the entire regulatory
system to apply the kind of proper governance and adequate risk management which
would have prevented not just the laundering of blood money, but the global crisis."
These banks are clearly protected and so is everyone in them. Perhaps this is why there has been
a high rate of banker suicides lately. Maybe witnesses to some major crime are being removed!
Either way, no one went to jail. But damn if you cant go to jail for having an ounce of marijuana
on your person!
Is this some more of the Hope and Change you thought you were going to get? These banks
launder money for the CIA and the Oligarchy who own the President and everyone under the
President. Of course no one is going to jail. That is some Wealth privilege there!
Wealth privilege is Chelsea Clinton who did nothing in life but go to a high end school because
she is the daughter of an ex-President. Wealth privilege is being Chelsea Clinton who makes more
in a 15 minute speech than 80% of Americans do in a year just because of her last name. Wealth
privilege is being a Kardashian or a Hilton. Make some sex tapes, have low IQs, have the last name
of their billionaire parents and then get paid to show up at events as a so called celebrity!


White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

Wealth privilege is never worrying about not being able to pay your bills. Wealth privilege is
never having to worry about your credit score. Wealth privilege is about never ever worrying where
your next meal is going to come from or ever worry about not having a roof over your head.
When 90 percent of the White population are poor, the global elite will hail themselves as heroes
and most of the mindless zombies will too. Little do the zombies know that the very same global
elite who are the so-called heroes, created the economic conditions 99 percent of the world is
suffering from. Little do they know this same Oligarchy and their ancestry has owned the USA to
some capacity since day one and it is that same Oligarchy ancestry that profited from slavery,
instigated the civil war for profit, false flagged their way into World War I, World War II, Vietnam,
Korea, and all the conflicts in the Middle East to further their agenda of global domination!
Wealth privilege is being able to control the education system and the Media. Wealth privilege
is being able to throw the White middle class under a bus while pretending to be for equality!
Lets take for instance slavery. The way the Media and history books portray things, you would
swear that every White person from the 1600s to 2015 owned slaves. And of course school
curriculum teaches us that Whites were indentured, not outright slaves.
The truth of the matter is only 1.6% of the population owned slaves. Of that 1.6%, 80% owned
one slave. Of that 80%, most were nannys or hired hands who helped raise children and do
work around the house. They were not beaten and whipped. Of the 1.6% who owned slaves, it
was the large plantation owners who owned 90% of the slaves. The plantation slaves were often
beaten, raped, and mistreated. Guess who owned plantations? The .001 percent of the day and that
money has been passed down generation to generation. A lot of todays wealth was built based
off of the wealth accumulated from slavery. Not the middle class but the .001 percent.
What is isnt taught is the first 500,000 slaves in the USA were White, they were Irish. What
else isnt taught is that the first slave owner was Black. And that a lot of well to do Blacks owned
both black and White slaves. That Native Americans owned Black and White slaves.
Or that the slave trade started in Africa and the Middle East long before the USA and Europe
got involved. That slavery was marketed to Europe and that all of the slaves taken out of Africa
were abducted out of the jungle by Africans and dragged to the harbors to be put on slave ships
for profit. Or that the Middle East and Africans had millions of White European slaves. That is
wealth privilege, being able to hide true history from the public. Wealth privilege gives one the
ability to be a two face where they cover their tracks and redirect blame.
Wealth privilege is being able to put Roots on primetime television and market it as history
when in fact not only was the story stolen by Alex Haley who was sued and fined, most of the
story was made up, it was fabricated by Alex Haley. The original story was a few scribbled notes
that were found in a diary by a White man. But wow was that great for race relations wasnt it!
Yeah, that is wealth privilege, because that generated all kinds of viewership for the corporate
owned Media and its shareholders!
The purpose of hiding the history of slavery of Whites versus Blacks while promoting the other
is obvious. Class and race division! Blame the average White middle class male and their ancestry
while victimizing Blacks. If the truth was taught, it would not create division between anyone but
the 99% and the .001 percent but instead, because of how its taught, the .001 are ignored while
the 99% fight amongst each other.


White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and


What is Multi-Culturalism?
The White privilege movement is part of multi-culturalism which is part of Globalism which is
destroying the West. If you arent for open borders, you are racist. The wealthy via the Media use
that term for everything. No culture thrives under multiculturalism. No culture has ever thrived
under it. And that is why its being promoted in the USA, Europe, UK, and Australia. To destroy
the countries and bring them down so they fit into the global government agenda. If
multiculturalism worked, the USA would be thriving. But as multiculturalism grows, poverty and
crime in the USA does too.
Being against multiculturalism has nothing to do with racism. A culture is a nations identity.
Each country in the world has its own culture. China has its culture, Saudi Arabia has its culture,
Brazil has its culture and Nigeria has its culture. Within the country there are subcultures. Being
proud of a country is nationalism. There is nothing wrong with having pride in the country you
live in. People who move to Brazil, Japan, China, Nigeria, or Saudi Arabia adapt to that countries
customs and courtesies. Those countries dont restructure their culture around the immigrant. But
in Western countries, the opposite is being promoted. That is not because the .001 percent cares
about treating foreigners equally. That is because they know it will tear down nationalism and
the countries identity. That it will weaken the country making it easier to take over and control!
This is what multiculturalism gets the west! If you Google multiculturalism and rape you
will see story after story of Western women raped by foreigners while the .001 percent owned
Media sweeps it under the rug and while the .001 percent owned law enforcement allow it to
happen while protecting the third world trash!
Sweden: Rape Capital of the West
Forty years after the Swedish parliament unanimously decided to change the formerly
homogenous Sweden into a multicultural country, violent crime has increased by 300%
and rapes by 1,472%. Sweden is now number two on the list of rape countries, surpassed
only by Lesotho in Southern Africa.
Significantly, the report does not touch on the background of the rapists. One should,
however, keep in mind that in statistics, second-generation immigrants are counted as
In an astounding number of cases, the Swedish courts have demonstrated sympathy for
the rapists, and have acquitted suspects who have claimed that the girl wanted to have sex
with six, seven or eight men.
The internet radio station Granskning Sverige called the mainstream newspapers
Aftonposten and Expressen to ask why they had described the perpetrators as "Swedish
men" when they actually were Somalis without Swedish citizenship. They were hugely
offended when asked if they felt any responsibility to warn Swedish women to stay away
from certain men. One journalist asked why that should be their responsibility.
In 1975, the Swedish parliament unanimously decided to change the former
homogeneous Sweden into a multicultural country. Forty years later the dramatic
consequences of this experiment emerge: violent crime has increased by 300%.
If one looks at the number of rapes, however, the increase is even worse. In 1975, 421
rapes were reported to the police; in 2014, it was 6,620. That is an increase of 1,472%.


White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

Sweden is now number two on the global list of rape countries. According to a survey
from 2010, Sweden, with 53.2 rapes per 100,000 inhabitants, is surpassed only by tiny
Lesotho in Southern Africa, with 91.6 rapes per 100,000 inhabitants.
Nationalism is not what the .001 percent want. Nationalism does not fit into the Globalism agenda.
Globalism is open borders and no country. No country will have its own government but instead
there will be a global government. Today within the United States there is the federal government
and state governments. What the .001 percent want is to mimic that where they have more granular
control. Instead of there being a federal government that oversees the United States of America,
there will be an equivalent to state government as the states have today. The equivalent to the
federal government will be global government. Every country will have the equivalent of a state
government that answers to the global government.
You cant achieve this with gung no nationalists who are proud of their country. So how do you
wear a country down? You flood it with 10s of millions of legal and illegal immigrants who care
nothing about the culture or country they are immigrating too. And then they use those immigrants
to promote hatred and racism as the backdrop for pushing the agenda forward. You dont want
immigrants in the country because they are Brown, you are a racist. You dont want Mexicans in
the country, you are a racist.
How much do you think the .001 percent who are mainly White, care about those 10s of
millions of Brown people coming into the country illegally? And what is worse is the usage of
Brown. South America contains all races! And half of my Mexican friends and family members
are whiter than I am. But they can promote anything if the Media repeats it enough to people who
are easily influenced and manipulated!
If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe
it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from
the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally
important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal
enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State. Joseph Goebbels

Angry White Man

Wouldnt you be angry if you watched everything you worked hard for and earned, that your
parents earned in servitude to the .001 percent was taken away by the .001 percent? When you
know the .001 percent are using the race card, bigot card, and promoting illegal immigrations to
further that destruction. Wouldnt you be angry knowing you are smart enough to see the
destruction of wealth and the Constitution using fake programs to push that agenda at your
expense? Wouldnt you be angry knowing you know what is going on and who is under attack
yet know most of the zombies are clueless and have no idea why, who it will truly benefit, and that
you are being thrown under a bus?
The angry old White guy is watching the government tax them, destroy their stock, remove the
equity in their homes by driving down the price of homes, and running up the deficit which is
causing everything to go up in price.

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

Think you might be angry if you spent your life working for the .001 percent who turned around
and cut your pension, outsourced your job, stole your wealth, and then promoted you as a racist?
The angry old White guy is another ploy by the .001 percent controlled Media and Academia
to throw people off of the scent. Most of the wealth is owned by the not so angry White guy!
Everyone who is anti-White thinks they are going to have their way of life promoted to royalty
any moment now. If they just get rid of those pesky Republicans and racist old angry White guy.
Is that desperate hope? People being nave or are they just plain Stupid? Whatever their rational is
for agreeing with these racist and bigoted movements, the people who think they are getting over
are not. They are directing their anger at the wrong demographic. These same idiots clap and cheer
for Obama, Hillary Clinton, Bernie Sanders and Jeb Bush yet fail to understand the problem with
all of todays societal issues lays within the Political structure, within both parties, and with their
owners, the .001 percent. Things will eventually collapse and all of those desperate anti-White
liberals will then realize there was never any intent to promote their standard of living, that they
were used and exploited to fulfill an agenda.

The Game of Chess

We are all pawns being sacrificed for a much bigger move in the future. In the game of chess, there
are both white pawns and black pawns. Although they are white pawns and black pawns, they are
still pawns. Pawns are there to take one for the team. They are expendable at any cost! The
board if full of pawns and make no mistake, the Bishop, Knight, and Rook are pawns as well.
Those are the politicians! They are just 2nd and 3rd level pawns. Even the Queen is a pawn. All of
these pawns take orders from the King who they are protecting.
Only in the case of reality and not chess, these pawns, which are really all of us, dont know
who they are protecting. They think they are getting even with each kill, when in fact they are
being steered in a certain direction. They are being manipulated! They are doing the bidding of the
very same people who are destroying their country.
Without a middle class, there is no wealth to fight back.
For everyone who is behind White privilege, wake up! This is not about White, Black, Brown,
Yellow, Red, Green or Purple. This is about ENSLAVING the entire planet! Every year they
introduce programs to fight a problem. How many of you have seen a true benefit or positive
impact on the war on poverty, war on crime, war on drugs, or the war on terror? A very few
percentage of people can say yes, and 99 percent of that demographic is profiting from it.
Its all a lie!
You see the unemployment and welfare rates. Cost of school. The economy and loss of wealth.
You tell me where that White privilege is, because everyone who I know who is White isnt
benefiting because of the color of their skin in the least bit! And that is a lot of people. I have never
seen such chaos and misery in my life compared to the last few years. And that isnt just with
White people that is with all people.
We are heading toward a global Feudal System where the ruling elite control everything, 100
percent of everything. They will control every aspect of agriculture, natural resources and access
to food and water. They will control patents, no new inventions will ever be granted to an

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

individual where it instead will be owned by the ruling class and disseminated to the general
population how they sit fit. Very few people will ever be elevated above peasant. You are either
of royalty and a certain family bloodline, or a surf, a peasant, the help!
Does that sound like freedom and equality to you? Be careful what you ask for!
White privilege is a myth. Its a political, ethnic, and racial divider meant to keep the peasants
fighting amongst each other instead of focusing on the drastically larger problem while slowly
burying history and the .001 percents involvement in past atrocities. Its an avenue for the .001
percent to drain more wealth with the consent of the minority base and White guilt.
Every four years both Republicans and Democrats promise equality, redistribution of wealth,
middle class jobs, and taxing the rich. And amazingly, every four years everyone continues to buy
into that BS. And the beauty of it, both political parties using the .001 percent controlled Media
are able to continue to use the art of misdirection and even more amazingly, people continue to
buy it. Its the Republicans fault, its Fox News, its Bushs fault. Its Obamas fault, its CNNs
fault, its MSNBCs fault and what is the end result? NO ONE ever held accountable and probably
the worst of all, people still pledge an oath to a given political party actually thinking something
is going to change. You have 535 Congressional members doing the same thing. They point the
finger at each party while they all simultaneously pass legislation that is removing Americas
Equality to the point of bringing people into prosperity will NEVER happen. Not while the
current 535 Congressional members are in power and not when the .001 percent, corporations, and
banks write legislation and own Congress. But you keep fixated on your gay marriage rights and
removal of the Confederate Flag, because that is more important than the economy, free trade,
outsourcing, insourcing, the Patriot Act, NDAA, bank bailouts and Stimulus bail outs.

And two more topics I want to touch on. First, healthcare. Most of what they are telling the public
is a lie! Numerous examples of how the Affordable Care Act is a scam. First, my dad lost Medicare
D which forced him onto another program in which his prescription medicine DOUBLED in cost.
And three people I have come across in the last year. One makes $30,000 a year. White male with
one child. With subsidies his healthcare was still going to cost him $500 a month plus their
ridiculous $3,000 dollar deductible. Another guy I know makes near $40,000, has a wife and 2
kids. He did not qualify for subsidies because of that income. The result, $700 a month for
insurance plus the $3,000 deductible. How many people making $30,000 to $40,000 with kids
can afford $500 to $700 a month plus the deductible? If you factor the monthly premium and
deductible, these guys would be paying between $9,000 and $11,000 for healthcare. And finally,
the most recent guy I ran into, he works part time because his pension is around $40,000 but
because of that pension, does not qualify for subsidies. He pays $1,100 a month for regular
insurance and said with the deductible and monthly premium its still cheaper than ObamaCare.
People I work with who are contractors, their insurance is going up. Large deductibles and
terrible coverage along with high monthly premiums.


White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

And you either dont have insurance or you pay a penalty. That is why the IRS got involved, to
start removing more wealth from the middle class. The Affordable Care Act is nothing but a direct
attack on the middle class wealth. It is another redistribution of wealth taking place and like every
program these criminals have passed for a century, it was advertised for the poor and the
minorities. The Affordable Care Act was advertised for minorities. But you already read the
stats, there are more White people living in poverty than both Hispanic and Black put together!
But you suckers fell for it, the typical race card that was once again played by the liberals.

Criminals and Law Enforcement

The race baiting and race card continues. Michael Brown, earlier in the day seen manhandling a
store clerk. All evidence proves Michael Brown went after the cop while in his car. Evidence
proves he was shot in the front, not the back. Four warning shots that Michael Brown ignored as
he charged forward. Whos fault? The cops somehow, because he was White and Michael Brown
was Black.
Eric Garner, someone peddling cigarettes illegally, had been arrested multiple times for the
same crime. Eric Garner, who instead of doing what the police told him to do which is put his
hands behind his back, resisted arrest. Now, the choke hold was uncalled for, absolutely uncalled
for. But had Garner A) not been committing a crime he had already been arrested for multiple
times, B) not resisted arrest, would have lived that day! Whos fault? Cops fault, because Eric
Garner is Black and the cop was White.
Dylann Roof shoots and kills several Black people in a church. Guess what all of these have
in common? The Media, Salon, CNN, MSNBC, were blatant and repetitive in their White
accusers and Black victims 24/7. And then they dragged the Confederate Flag into the picture.
The same Flag Al Gore and Bill Clinton ran on in 1992 in which most minorities who voted, voted
for Gore and Clinton. What was achieved out of all of this?
Division. Hatred for the police, hatred for White people! And legislation! Nice job people! I
have ocean front property in Arizona for sale, any takers?
Then you have these, that never made Mainstream and if they did, it was a blip on the screen and
none were labeled hate crimes. No 24/7 coverage by Salon, MSNBC, or CNN.
Garland, Texas shooting. Mainstream Media on the left said Two men repetitively. With the
Ferguson shooting, Eric Garner, and Dylann Roof, the Media used White cop and White
shooter as their theme. Nonstop! Elton Simpson and Nadir Soofi, one a Black Muslim, shot
people with an assault rifle. No call for banning Islam or even weapons. Because the shooters
werent White and the victims werent Black. Very little coverage on the second Fort Hood
shooting and very little to say from Obama and the Department of Justice. Maybe because Ivan
Lopez wasnt White and the victims were?
What about Maj. Nidal Hasan who killed 13 people and at his trial he called himself a
"mujahedeen," or Muslim holy warrior. But the Media and President didnt call him a Muslim or
a terrorist. But damn did they say White shooter Roof was a racist and identified him with
White people! Labeled anyone who has a Confederate Flag as racist. And the Zionist owned
corporations started banning sales of that flag.
Chattanooga shooting, sound familiar? Mohammad Youssef Abdulazeez who is Muslim and
was born in Kuwait, murdered 5 US Marines. No flag at half-mast yet either and the Media still
cant find a motive!

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

In the meantime, 100s of Black on White rapes and murders happen in the background while
the liberals on the left enjoy their equality!
All of this is meant to kick start a race war. The Federal government is desperate to nationalize the
police. The more the people hate the police, the more the police hate the people, the more violence
that is good for the elites agenda. More and more people will want this nationalization and gun
confiscation because they believe the government will protect them. That somehow nationalizing
the police will turn them into psychics!
Ever heard of the Nazi SS? That is exactly what you are going to get! And you will wonder
where your freedoms went. The same freedoms you gave away voluntarily for safety.
Zionist PAWNS!
"I am a Zionist. You don't have to be a Jew to Be A Zionist" Joe Biden in 2007
If Christians are the only ones being attacked in the Middle East and they are destroying historical
relics, statues, etc. and Liberals in the USA are doing the exact same thing, do we really buy that
ISIS are Muslims? Or do we believe the pictures where ISIS members have US Army tattoos?

Angry about Obamas Right to Fast Track Trade?

Ever heard of the Bipartisan Trade Promotion Authority Act of 2002? Me neither, not until recently
and by mistake. Dont recall the Republicans complaining about it in 2002. A Californian
Republican introduced the bill. This is the same premise of NAFTA and the Patriot Act. It did not
pass in the past and everyone forgot about it. And once again, a bill is rammed through Congress
at a later date. Always remember it took CONGRESS to introduce the bill and pass it. Until that
point, Obama has no authority to do anything.
Congress by order of their masters were instructed to write the Fast Track Bill. That is it. This
isnt a Republican versus Democrat conversation. BOTH are involved!

You are Overbreeding Scum

This is essentially what the .001 percent is telling you through their quotes, programs and their
I'd like to share a revelation that I've had during my time here. It came to me when I tried
to classify your species and I realized that you're not actually mammals. Every mammal
on this planet instinctively develops a natural equilibrium with the surrounding
environment but you humans do not. You move to an area and you multiply and multiply
until every natural resource is consumed and the only way you can survive is to spread to
another area. There is another organism on this planet that follows the same pattern. Do
you know what it is? A virus. Human beings are a disease, a cancer of this planet. You're
a plague and we are the cure. Agent Smith from the Matrix!

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and


There is a meaning in the Matrix, a true real life meaning in which Neo is offered the choice
between the red and blue pill. You can go on living in denial and ignore what is going on or you
can accept reality for what it really is. Your world of a two party system and a world of equality
is a dream!
Unfortunately, no one can betold what the Matrix is. You have to see it for yourself.
This is your last chance. After this, there is no turning back. You take the blue pill, the
story ends; you wake up in your bed and believe whatever you want to believe. You take
the red pill, you stay in Wonderland, and I show you how deep the rabbit hole goes.
Remember: all I'm offering is the truth. Nothing more. Morpheus from the Matrix
And finally, aside from what I already mentioned, this is all to distract you from paying attention
to the real legislation that is being passed. To Monsanto gaining control of the global and US food
supply. To distract you from what GMOs are doing to you. To distract you from what Big
Pharmas drugs are doing to you. To distract you from geo-engineering and weather manipulation.
To distract you from the water wars, droughts, and global water and food shortages that is
occurring and how Nestle and various other corporations are draining the aquifers and selling the
water for profit. To distract you from Ukraine, Russia and China. To distract you from the debt.
To distract you from Fukishima and the dying oceans.
You dont see any REAL news, none of these topics are discussed and certainly not in a truthful
manner. But you do see 24x7 BS in the news. The news is a massive talk show and has the Media
have turned into full tie Gossip queens.
This isnt about White people, this is about all people. Ask yourself why the .001 percent who
are rapidly expanding their global control of wealth would promote White privilege.
If you want to know who is doing this, all you have to do is look who are members of the Bilderberg
Group, Trilateral Commission, high level United Nations members, Skull and Bonesman,
Bohemian Grove, European Royalty, wealthy elitists, high level politicians in the USA, Europe,
UK, and Australia, Congress, Supreme Court, CEOs and Board members of major banks,
corporations, and the Media. The major shareholders in all of these establishments. CIA, Mossad,
Yes, it is that broad. Many men have spoken about it!
The very word "secrecy" is repugnant in a free and open society; and we are as a people inherently
and historically opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths and secret proceedings. We decided
long ago that the dangers of excessive and unwarranted concealment of pertinent facts far
outweighed the dangers which are cited to justify it. Even today, there is little value in opposing
the threat of a closed society by imitating its arbitrary restrictions. Even today, there is little value
in insuring the survival of our nation if our traditions do not survive with it. And there is very grave
danger that an announced need for increased security will be seized upon those anxious to expand
its meaning to the very limits of official censorship and concealment. That I do not intend to permit
to the extent that it is in my control. And no official of my Administration, whether his rank is high
or low, civilian or military, should interpret my words here tonight as an excuse to censor the news,

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and

to stifle dissent, to cover up our mistakes or to withhold from the press and the public the facts
they deserve to know."
"For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies on covert
means for expanding its sphere of influence--on infiltration instead of invasion, on subversion
instead of elections, on intimidation instead of free choice, on guerrillas by night instead of armies
by day. It is a system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building
of a tightly knit, highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence,
economic, scientific and political operations.
Its preparations are concealed, not published. Its mistakes are buried not headlined. Its dissenters
are silenced, not praised. No expenditure is questioned, no rumor is printed, no secret is revealed."
"No President should fear public scrutinity of his program. For from that scrutiny comes
understanding; and from that understanding comes support or opposition. And both are necessary.
I am not asking your newspapers to support the Administration, but I am asking your help in the
tremendous task of informing and alerting the American people. For I have complete confidence
in the response and dedication of our citizens whenever they are fully informed. - John F. Kennedy
Our military organization today bears little relation to that known by any of my predecessors in
peacetime, or indeed by the fighting men of World War II or Korea.
Until the latest of our world conflicts, the United States had no armaments industry. American
makers of plowshares could, with time and as required, make swords as well. But now we can no
longer risk emergency improvisation of national defense; we have been compelled to create a
permanent armaments industry of vast proportions. Added to this, three and a half million men and
women are directly engaged in the defense establishment. We annually spend on military security
more than the net income of all United States corporations.
This conjunction of an immense military establishment and a large arms industry is new in the
American experience. The total influence -- economic, political, even spiritual -- is felt in every
city, every State house, every office of the Federal government. We recognize the imperative need
for this development. Yet we must not fail to comprehend its grave implications. Our toil, resources
and livelihood are all involved; so is the very structure of our society.
In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence,
whether sought or unsought, by the military industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous
rise of misplaced power exists and will persist.
We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes.
We should take nothing for granted. Only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry can compel the
proper meshing of the huge industrial and military machinery of defense with our peaceful
methods and goals, so that security and liberty may prosper together. Dwight D. Eisenhower
Both of these speeches were given in 1961. They were warning us that the country has been
hijacked and one of them died for it!

White Privilege, Black Lives Matter, Equality, Global Warming, and


Ignorance may be bliss but the truth will set you free!

And a Cliff Note of what is going on.

In short, the Blacklivesmatter, White privilege, multiculturalism, open borders is to usher in a New
World Order. With the economy SO bad and crime increasing, there will be more lawlessness.
With more illegal immigrants flooding into the country, there will be more lawlessness and debt.
More shootings of Blacks by White cops will call for nationalizing the police. The declining
state of the economy will call for help from the World Bank. And the racial violence, drug gang
violence will call for additional help. In comes the United Nations Peacekeepers to save the day.
They are creating the condition where 99 percent of the population begs for any help they can get.
They will be so desperate for any solution that they will agree to any solution provided. And that
will be yielding control of the United States and eliminating the Constitution in favor of a global
Charter, Charter under the United Nations.
World Government!