Punisher wrote: ↑7:54 PM - May 16
KAT Chuut-Ritt wrote: ↑6:21 PM - May 15
Scorpio wrote: ↑6:06 PM - May 15
Dannytoro-01 wrote: ↑2:02 AM - May 15
Yeah, kill the Jews. The new Democrat policy. Normal.
Seems to me that there are foreign influences that want to turn both radicals against the jews. Israel's safest bet for support these days is the political middle. You've got the radical HAMAS lovers on the left and Putin's influence with Neo Nazi's on the right... Israel is a thorn in his side for a number of reasons and an adversary to Russia.
So I'm in no rush to "forsake" Israel. The US was making a lot of good mainstream progress on Israel and arab states like Saudi Arabia etc... For decades that alliance of strange bedfellows has been a thorn it the side of Iran (and Russia) ... So they have retaliated with their own strange bedfellow approach .... HAMAS and the radical left ... the adversaries of the US are now keen enough to use radical left and right groups in the US against our country.
While not a member of HAMAS or connected directly to Iran Omar is a prototype of the way they have gone about influencing the left in the US ...
She has been around for a while. I see her as playing the "the foot in the door" role ... she's been sorta quite lately after the HAMAS attack but has slowly reemerged with some choice comments she might be censured for via Congress ... lol ...
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ilhan-omars-pro-genocide-jews-remark-sparks-house-censure-effort
Ilhan Omar’s 'pro-genocide' Jews remark sparks House censure effort
The right leaning NAZI's have been replaced by a left wing deal that's even stranger than they were ... I mean muslims are Fundamentally conservatives. But conservatives in America are historically CHRISTIANS. Hence the paradox plays into the breach.
The Nazis (National Socialists) considered themselves to be "progressive"
The Nazis considered themselves the enemy of the left.
It's complex ...
The Nazi's grew initially from the left but in modern times has little of that leftover ... the slow shift started in the 1930's ...
"Large segments of the Nazi Party, particularly among the members of the
Sturmabteilung (SA), were committed to the party's official socialist, revolutionary and anti-capitalist positions and expected both a social and an economic revolution when the party gained power in 1933.
[57] In the period immediately before the Nazi seizure of power, there were even Social Democrats and Communists who switched sides and became known as "Beefsteak Nazis": brown on the outside and red inside.
[58] The leader of the SA, Ernst Röhm, pushed for a "second revolution" (the "first revolution" being the Nazis' seizure of power) that would enact socialist policies. Furthermore, Röhm desired that the SA absorb the much smaller German Army into its ranks under his leadership.
[57] Once the Nazis achieved power, Röhm's SA was directed by Hitler to violently suppress the parties of the left, but they also began attacks against individuals deemed to be associated with conservative reaction.
[59] Hitler saw Röhm's independent actions as violating and possibly threatening his leadership, as well as jeopardising the regime by alienating the conservative President Paul von Hindenburg and the conservative-oriented German Army.
[60] This resulted in Hitler purging Röhm and other radical members of the SA in 1934, in what came to be known as the Night of the Long Knives.
[60]
Before he joined the Bavarian Army to fight in World War I, Hitler had lived a bohemian lifestyle as a petty street watercolour artist in Vienna and Munich and he maintained elements of this lifestyle later on, going to bed very late and rising in the afternoon, even after he became Chancellor and then Führer.
[61] After the war, his battalion was absorbed by the Bavarian Soviet Republic from 1918 to 1919, where he was elected Deputy Battalion Representative. According to historian Thomas Weber, Hitler attended the funeral of communist Kurt Eisner (a German Jew), wearing a black mourning armband on one arm and a red communist armband on the other,
[62] which he took as evidence that Hitler's political beliefs had not yet solidified.
[62] In
Mein Kampf, Hitler never mentioned any service with the Bavarian Soviet Republic and he stated that he became an anti-Semite in 1913 during his years in Vienna. This statement has been disputed by the contention that he was not an antisemite at that time,
[63] even though it is well established that he read many antisemitic tracts and journals during that time and admired Karl Lueger, the anti-Semitic mayor of Vienna.
[64] Hitler altered his political views in response to the signing of the Treaty of Versailles in June 1919 and it was then that he became an anti-Semitic, German nationalist.
[63]
Hitler expressed opposition to capitalism, regarding it as having Jewish origins and accusing capitalism of holding nations ransom to the interests of a parasitic cosmopolitan rentier class.
[65] He also expressed opposition to communism and egalitarian forms of socialism, arguing that inequality and hierarchy are beneficial to the nation.
[66] He believed that communism was invented by the Jews to weaken nations by promoting class struggle.
[67] After his rise to power, Hitler took a pragmatic position on economics, accepting private property and allowing capitalist private enterprises to exist so long as they adhered to the goals of the Nazi state, but not tolerating enterprises that he saw as being opposed to the national interest.[51] (wik)
Once that happened Germany pushed the socialist message in Nazism farther and farther down the ladder with each year and expressed and boosted racism, militarism, and nationalism. He still used the socialist pseudo message decoratively but in reality the message was really anti socialist in the extreme ...
"As early as March 1933, two months after Hitler was appointed Chancellor, the Sturmabteilung began to attack trade union offices without legal consequences. Several union offices were occupied, their furnishings were destroyed, their documents were stolen or burned, and union members were beaten and in some cases killed; the police ignored these attacks and declared itself without jurisdiction.
[2] These early attacks occurred at random, carried out spontaneously by rank-and-file Nazis motivated by a desire to destroy Marxism,
[3] and the Nazi Party leadership only implemented a general policy in May. On 2 May, 1933, trade union headquarters throughout Germany were occupied, their funds were confiscated, and the unions were officially abolished and their leaders arrested.
[4] Many union leaders were beaten and sent to concentration camps, including some who had previously agreed to cooperate with the Nazis.
[4]" (WIKPEDIA)
Now more than half a century NEO Nazi tends to be more aligned with the right than the left in America because Liberalism lead the charge on Civil Rights in the 1960' and only until just recently (with this Palestinian invasion of their ranks), have turned a over a new "flavor" ... attracted by the left's "diversity" credo I think many arab types see more opportunity for their style of racism there (since they are not considered "white") as long as the targets aren't black or Hispanic.
Now things are a genuine mess. Seriously.
Messy messy ....