Is Disordered Eating in Young People Now a Public Health Emergency?
You are leaving Medscape Education
Cancel Continue
Log in to save activities Your saved activities will show here so that you can easily access them whenever you're ready. Log in here CME & Education Log in to keep track of your credits.
 

CME / ABIM MOC / CE

Is Disordered Eating in Young People Now a Public Health Emergency?

  • Authors: News Author: Daniela Barros; CME Author: Laurie Barclay, MD
  • CME / ABIM MOC / CE Released: 6/23/2023
  • Valid for credit through: 6/23/2024, 11:59 PM EST

  • Credits Available

    Physicians - maximum of 0.25 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™

    ABIM Diplomates - maximum of 0.25 ABIM MOC points

    Nurses - 0.25 ANCC Contact Hour(s) (0 contact hours are in the area of pharmacology)

    Physician Assistant - 0.25 AAPA hour(s) of Category I credit

    IPCE - 0.25 Interprofessional Continuing Education (IPCE) credit

    You Are Eligible For

    • Letter of Completion
    • ABIM MOC points

Target Audience and Goal Statement

This activity is intended for psychiatrists, family medicine/primary care clinicians, pediatricians, public health and prevention officials, nurses, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and other members of the healthcare team who treat and manage young people with eating disorders.

The goal of this activity is for members of the healthcare team to be better able to describe the proportion of disordered eating among children and adolescents, as assessed with the 5-item Sick, Control, One, Fat, Food (SCOFF) questionnaire, based on a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Upon completion of this activity, participants will:

  • Describe the proportion of disordered eating among children and adolescents as assessed with SCOFF, based on a systematic review and meta-analysis
  • Identify clinical and public health implications of the proportion among children and adolescents of disordered eating as assessed with SCOFF, based on a systematic review and meta-analysis
  • Outline implications for the healthcare team


Disclosures

Medscape, LLC requires every individual in a position to control educational content to disclose all financial relationships with ineligible companies that have occurred within the past 24 months. Ineligible companies are organizations whose primary business is producing, marketing, selling, re-selling, or distributing healthcare products used by or on patients.

All relevant financial relationships for anyone with the ability to control the content of this educational activity are listed below and have been mitigated. Others involved in the planning of this activity have no relevant financial relationships.


News Author

  • Daniela Barros

    Freelance writer, Medscape

    Disclosures

    Daniela Barros has no relevant financial relationships.

CME Author

  • Laurie Barclay, MD

    Freelance writer and reviewer
    Medscape, LLC

    Disclosures

    Laurie Barclay, MD, has no relevant financial relationships.

Editor/Nurse Planner

  • Stephanie Corder, ND, RN, CHCP

    Associate Director, Accreditation and Compliance, Medscape, LLC

    Disclosures

    Stephanie Corder, ND, RN, CHCP, has no relevant financial relationships.

Compliance Reviewer

  • Yaisanet Oyola, MD

    Associate Director, Accreditation and Compliance, Medscape, LLC

    Disclosures

    Yaisanet Oyola, MD, has no relevant financial relationships.

Peer Reviewer

This activity has been peer reviewed and the reviewer has no relevant financial relationships.


Accreditation Statements

Medscape

Interprofessional Continuing Education

In support of improving patient care, Medscape, LLC is jointly accredited with commendation by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE), and the American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC), to provide continuing education for the healthcare team.

IPCE

This activity was planned by and for the healthcare team, and learners will receive 0.25 Interprofessional Continuing Education (IPCE) credit for learning and change.

    For Physicians

  • Medscape, LLC designates this enduring material for a maximum of 0.25 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™ . Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.

    Successful completion of this CME activity, which includes participation in the evaluation component, enables the participant to earn up to 0.25 MOC points in the American Board of Internal Medicine's (ABIM) Maintenance of Certification (MOC) program. Participants will earn MOC points equivalent to the amount of CME credits claimed for the activity. It is the CME activity provider's responsibility to submit participant completion information to ACCME for the purpose of granting ABIM MOC credit.

    The European Union of Medical Specialists (UEMS)-European Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (EACCME) has an agreement of mutual recognition of continuing medical education (CME) credit with the American Medical Association (AMA). European physicians interested in converting AMA PRA Category 1 credit™ into European CME credit (ECMEC) should contact the UEMS (www.uems.eu).

    College of Family Physicians of Canada Mainpro+® participants may claim certified credits for any AMA PRA Category 1 credit(s)™, up to a maximum of 50 credits per five-year cycle. Any additional credits are eligible as non-certified credits. College of Family Physicians of Canada (CFPC) members must log into Mainpro+® to claim this activity.

    Through an agreement between the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education and the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada, medical practitioners participating in the Royal College MOC Program may record completion of accredited activities registered under the ACCME’s “CME in Support of MOC” program in Section 3 of the Royal College’s MOC Program.

    Contact This Provider

    For Nurses

  • Awarded 0.25 contact hour(s) of nursing continuing professional development for RNs and APNs; 0.00 contact hours are in the area of pharmacology.

    Contact This Provider

  • For Physician Assistants

    Medscape, LLC has been authorized by the American Academy of PAs (AAPA) to award AAPA Category 1 CME credit for activities planned in accordance with AAPA CME Criteria. This activity is designated for 0.25 AAPA Category 1 CME credits. Approval is valid until 06/23/2024. PAs should only claim credit commensurate with the extent of their participation.

For questions regarding the content of this activity, contact the accredited provider for this CME/CE activity noted above. For technical assistance, contact [email protected]


Instructions for Participation and Credit

There are no fees for participating in or receiving credit for this online educational activity. For information on applicability and acceptance of continuing education credit for this activity, please consult your professional licensing board.

This activity is designed to be completed within the time designated on the title page; physicians should claim only those credits that reflect the time actually spent in the activity. To successfully earn credit, participants must complete the activity online during the valid credit period that is noted on the title page. To receive AMA PRA Category 1 Credit™, you must receive a minimum score of 75% on the post-test.

Follow these steps to earn CME/CE credit*:

  1. Read the target audience, learning objectives, and author disclosures.
  2. Study the educational content online or printed out.
  3. Online, choose the best answer to each test question. To receive a certificate, you must receive a passing score as designated at the top of the test. We encourage you to complete the Activity Evaluation to provide feedback for future programming.

You may now view or print the certificate from your CME/CE Tracker. You may print the certificate but you cannot alter it. Credits will be tallied in your CME/CE Tracker and archived for 6 years; at any point within this time period you can print out the tally as well as the certificates from the CME/CE Tracker.

*The credit that you receive is based on your user profile.

CME / ABIM MOC / CE

Is Disordered Eating in Young People Now a Public Health Emergency?

Authors: News Author: Daniela Barros; CME Author: Laurie Barclay, MDFaculty and Disclosures

CME / ABIM MOC / CE Released: 6/23/2023

Valid for credit through: 6/23/2024, 11:59 PM EST

processing....

Clinical Context

Eating disorders are psychiatric disorders characterized by abnormal eating or weight control behaviors. They have serious morbidity and are among the most life-threatening of all mental health conditions.

In most mid- and high-income countries, eating disorder prevalence in young people has markedly increased over the past 50 years, creating a public health concern. Eating disorders are likely underdiagnosed and undertreated, as shame or stigmatization may lead to underreporting and delay in seeking specialized care.

Study Synopsis and Perspective

A multicenter study, published in the April 1 issue of JAMA Pediatrics[1] indicated that an elevated proportion of children and adolescents around the world, particularly girls or youths with high body mass indices (BMIs), experience disordered eating. The high figures are concerning from a public health perspective and highlight the need to implement strategies for preventing eating disorders.

These disorders, according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, Text Revision,[2] include anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, binge eating disorder, and eating disorder-not otherwise specified. The prevalence of these disorders in young people has markedly increased globally over the past 50 years.[3] Eating disorders are among the most life-threatening mental disorders; they were responsible for 318 deaths worldwide in 2019.[4]

Because some individuals with eating disorders conceal core symptoms and avoid or delay seeking specialist care because of feelings of embarrassment, stigma, or ambivalence toward treatment, most cases of eating disorders remain undetected and untreated.[5]

Brazilian researchers have conducted studies to assess risky behaviors and predisposing factors among young people.[5] The researchers observed that the probability of experiencing eating disorders was higher among young people who had an intense fear of gaining weight, who experienced thin-ideal internalization, who were excessively concerned about food, who experienced compulsive eating episodes, or who used laxatives. As previously reported, most participants in these studies had never sought professional help.

A group of researchers from several countries, including Brazilians connected to the State University of Londrina, Londrina, Paraná, Brazil, conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to study the global proportion of disordered eating in children and adolescents.[1]

José Francisco López-Gil, PhD, of the University of Castilla–La Mancha, Spain, coordinated the study. The investigators determined the rate of disordered eating among children and adolescents using the Sick, Control, One, Fat, Food (SCOFF) questionnaire,[7] which is the most widely used screening measure for eating disorders.

Methods and Results

Investigators systematically searched 4 databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library), with date limits from January 1999 to November 2022. Studies were required to meet the following criteria: (1) participants: studies of community samples of children and adolescents aged 6 to 18 years, and (2) outcome: disordered eating assessed by the SCOFF questionnaire. The exclusion criteria were (1) studies conducted with young people who had been diagnosed with physical or mental disorders; (2) studies that were published before 1999 because the SCOFF questionnaire was designed in that year; (3) studies in which data were collected during the COVID-19 pandemic because of the possibility of selection bias; (4) studies that employed data from the same surveys/studies, to avoid duplication; and (5) systematic reviews and/or meta-analyses and qualitative and case studies.[1]

In all, the systematic review and meta-analysis included 32 studies, which involved a total of 63,181 participants from 16 countries, according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.[8] The overall proportion of children and adolescents with disordered eating was 22.36% (95% CI: 18.84%, 26.09%); P < .001.[1] According to the researchers, girls were significantly more likely to report disordered eating (n = 27,548; 30.03% [95% CI: 25.61%, 34.65%]) than boys (n = 26,170; 16.98% [95% CI: 13.46%, 20.81%]); P < .001. It was also observed that disordered eating became more elevated with increasing age (B, 0.03 [95% CI: 0, 0.06]; P = .049) and BMI (B, 0.03 [95% CI: 0.01, 0.05]; P < .001).

Translation of Outcomes

According to the authors, this was the first meta-analysis that comprehensively examined the overall proportion of children and adolescents with disordered eating in terms of gender, mean age, and BMI. They identified 14,856 (22.36%) children and adolescents with disordered eating in the population analyzed. A relevant consideration made by the researchers is that, in general, disordered eating and eating disorders are not similar.

"Not all children and adolescents who reported disordered eating behaviors (for example, selective eating) will necessarily be diagnosed with an eating disorder," commented the authors.

Still, disordered eating in childhood or adolescence may predict outcomes associated with eating disorders in early adulthood.

"For this reason, this high proportion found is worrisome and calls for urgent action to try to address this situation," the authors advised.

The study also found that the proportion of children and adolescents with disordered eating was higher among girls than boys. The reasons for the difference in the prevalence with respect to the sex of the participants are not well understood. Boys are presumed to underreport the problem because of the societal perception that these disorders mostly affect girls and because disordered eating has usually been thought by the general population to be exclusive to girls and women.[9] In addition, it has been noted that the current diagnostic criteria for eating disorders fail to detect disordered eating behaviors more commonly observed in boys than in girls, such as intensely engaging in muscle mass gain and weight gain with the goal of improving body image satisfaction. On the other hand, the proportion of young people with disordered eating increased with increasing age and BMI. This finding is in line with the scientific literature worldwide.

The study has certain limitations. First, only studies that analyzed disordered eating using the SCOFF questionnaire were included. Second, because of the cross-sectional nature of most of the included studies, a causal relationship cannot be established. Third, owing to the inclusion of binge eating disorder and other eating disorders specified in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, there is not enough evidence to support the use of SCOFF in primary care and community-based settings for screening for the range of eating disorders. Fourth, the meta-analysis included studies in which self-report questionnaires were used to assess disordered eating, and consequently, social desirability and recall bias could have influenced the findings.[1]

Quick Measures Required

Identifying the magnitude of disordered eating and its distribution in at-risk populations is crucial for planning and executing actions aimed at preventing, detecting, and treating them. Eating disorders are a global public health problem that healthcare professionals, families, and other community members involved in caring for children and adolescents must not ignore, said researchers. In addition to diagnosed eating disorders, parents, guardians, and healthcare professionals should be aware of symptoms of disordered eating, which include behaviors such as weight loss dieting, binge eating, self-induced vomiting, excessive exercise, and the use of laxatives or diuretics without medical prescription.

Study Highlights

  • Systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library from January 1999 to November 2022 identified 32 studies (N = 63,181; 16 countries) of disordered eating assessed by SCOFF among community samples of children and adolescents ages 6 to 18 years.
  • Exclusion criteria were diagnoses of physical or mental disorders; studies during the COVID-19 pandemic because of possible selection bias; studies employing data from the same surveys/studies; systematic reviews and/or meta-analyses; and qualitative and case studies.
  • All studies were thought to have low risk for bias.
  • The overall proportion of children and adolescents with disordered eating (n = 14,856) was 22.36% (95% CI: 18.84%, 26.09%); P < .001, with no risk for publication bias.
  • Girls were significantly more likely to report disordered eating (n = 27,548; 30.03% [95% CI: 25.61%, 34.65%]) than boys (n = 26,170; 16.98% [13.46%, 20.81%]); P < .001.
  • Disordered eating was more prevalent with increasing age (P =.049) and BMI (P < .001), based on random-effects meta-regression models.
  • The investigators concluded that disordered eating measured by SCOFF occurred in > 1 in 5 youths and was even more prevalent among girls and with increasing age and BMI, consistent with medical literature worldwide.
  • Behaviors related to eating disorders may lead to greater risk or damage to health, significant distress, or significant impairment of functioning.
  • These high figures are a public health concern, highlighting the need to implement strategies for preventing eating disorders, including screening for them in primary care.
  • The American Academy of Pediatrics and the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry recommend screening youths by longitudinal height and weight monitoring and asking about symptoms of disordered eating.
  • As SCOFF is simple, memorable, and easy to administer and score, it may be considered a first approach to identify the need for more detailed and specialized evaluation.
  • Positive results should be followed by further questioning before referral to mental health professionals.
  • The findings can inform intervention priorities for disordered eating as a global health initiative to prevent possible health problems among youths, particularly girls and individuals with higher BMIs.
  • Although not all youths reporting disordered eating behavior will necessarily be diagnosed with an eating disorder, such behavior may predict outcomes associated with eating disorders in early adulthood.
  • Reasons for gender difference in prevalence are poorly understood.
  • Boys may underreport because of societal perceptions that eating disorders mostly affect girls and because the general population may think that disordered eating exclusively affects female persons.
  • Current diagnostic criteria for eating disorders fail to detect disordered eating behaviors more prevalent among boys, such as intense engagement in muscle mass and weight gain to improve body image satisfaction.
  • Study limitations include restriction to studies using SCOFF; cross-sectional design of most studies precluding causal inferences; insufficient evidence to support using SCOFF in primary care and community-based settings to screen for the range of eating disorders; and reliance on self-report, with potential for social desirability and recall bias.

Clinical Implications

  • Disordered eating occurred in > 1 in 5 youths and was even more prevalent among girls and with increasing age and BMI.
  • These high figures are a public health concern, highlighting the need to implement strategies for preventing eating disorders, including screening for them in primary care.
  • Members of the healthcare team should keep in mind that behaviors related to eating disorders may lead to greater risk or damage to health, significant distress, or significant impairment of functioning.

 

Earn Credit

  • Print