Enjoy fast, free delivery, exclusive deals, and award-winning movies & TV shows with Prime
Try Prime
and start saving today with fast, free delivery
Amazon Prime includes:
Fast, FREE Delivery is available to Prime members. To join, select "Try Amazon Prime and start saving today with Fast, FREE Delivery" below the Add to Cart button.
Amazon Prime members enjoy:- Cardmembers earn 5% Back at Amazon.com with a Prime Credit Card.
- Unlimited Free Two-Day Delivery
- Streaming of thousands of movies and TV shows with limited ads on Prime Video.
- A Kindle book to borrow for free each month - with no due dates
- Listen to over 2 million songs and hundreds of playlists
- Unlimited photo storage with anywhere access
Important: Your credit card will NOT be charged when you start your free trial or if you cancel during the trial period. If you're happy with Amazon Prime, do nothing. At the end of the free trial, your membership will automatically upgrade to a monthly membership.
-21% $15.00$15.00
Ships from: Amazon.com Sold by: Amazon.com
$11.80$11.80
Ships from: Amazon Sold by: Kuleli Books
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Audible sample Sample
Joan of Arc Paperback – September 1, 1989
Purchase options and add-ons
- Print length452 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherIgnatius Press
- Publication dateSeptember 1, 1989
- Dimensions5.5 x 1 x 8 inches
- ISBN-100898702682
- ISBN-13978-0898702682
Books with Buzz
Discover the latest buzz-worthy books, from mysteries and romance to humor and nonfiction. Explore more
Frequently bought together
Similar items that may ship from close to you
Editorial Reviews
Review
"I like Joan of Arc best of all my books; and it is the best; I know it perfectly well. And besides, it furnished me seven times the pleasure afforded me by any of the others; twelve years of preparation, and two years of writing. The others needed no preparation and got none." -- --Mark Twain
Mark Twain comes furtively like Nicodemus at night with this tribute to one of God's saints. In doing so he tells a secret about himself. It is as though the man in a white suit and a cloud of cigar smoke thought there just might be a place where people in white robes stand in clouds of incense. -- --Fr. George Rutler, Author, The Cure d'Ars Today
About the Author
Mark Twain is the author of many great American classics including Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, The Adventures of Tom Sawyer and Pudd'nhead Wilson. In 1867, Twain set sail for a five month tour of Europe and the Middle East, and the letters which he wrote while on this trip form the basis for "The Innocents Abroad".
Product details
- Publisher : Ignatius Press; First Edition (September 1, 1989)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 452 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0898702682
- ISBN-13 : 978-0898702682
- Item Weight : 1.07 pounds
- Dimensions : 5.5 x 1 x 8 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #11,266 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #9 in Christian Saints
- #48 in Biographical Historical Fiction
- #397 in Classic Literature & Fiction
- Customer Reviews:
About the author
Mark Twain is the pseudonym of Samuel Langhorne Clemens (1835 - 1910). He was born and brought up in the American state of Missouri and, because of his father's death, he left school to earn his living when he was only twelve. He was a great adventurer and travelled round America as a printer; prospected for gold and set off for South America to earn his fortune. He returned to become a steam-boat pilot on the Mississippi River, close to where he had grown up. The Civil War put an end to steam-boating and Clemens briefly joined the Confederate army - although the rest of his family were Unionists! He had already tried his hand at newspaper reporting and now became a successful journalist. He started to use the alias Mark Twain during the Civil War and it was under this pen name that he became a famous travel writer. He took the name from his steam-boat days - it was the river pilots' cry to let their men know that the water was two fathoms deep.
Mark Twain was always nostalgic about his childhood and in 1876 The Adventures of Tom Sawyer was published, based on his own experiences. The book was soon recognised as a work of genius and eight years later the sequel, The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, was published. The great writer Ernest Hemingway claimed that 'All modern literature stems from this one book.'
Mark Twain was soon famous all over the world. He made a fortune from writing and lost it on a typesetter he invented. He then made another fortune and lost it on a bad investment. He was an impulsive, hot-tempered man but was also quite sentimental and superstitious. He was born when Halley's Comet was passing the Earth and always believed he would die when it returned - this is exactly what happened.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonReviews with images
-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
The problem is that Clemens himself declared this book his `best.' He claimed to have researched it for twelve years, and he purported to regard Joan of Arc as the most flawless and admirable personage of human history -- "the most noble life that ever was born into this world save only One," in the language of the imaginary memoirist Louis de Conte. I wonder about those twelve years of research, mes amis. There's little proof of any study of social or cultural history in this novel, and what there is of political history could have been learned in a month, given the sources available to an anglophone dilettante in the 1880s and 1890s. Furthermore, when and where would Clemens have conducted those twelve years of study, presumably the actual years of his life from 1882 to 1892 (oops! make that 1880 to 1892), during which he wrote much of his total oeuvre? Or did he have an alternate lifespan as well as several pen names? And believe me, Clemens could not have read 15th C French by himself! It takes academic training just to decipher the script.
Is there any good reason why we shouldn't suspect that Clemens wrote his serial/novel for the simplest of reasons? For money? Clemens was in financial distress in the early 1890s, edging toward bankruptcy, as a result of bad investments and weak sales of his recent more-serious novels. Joan of Arc is not laborious reading. There's a good deal of gentle wit and mild buffoonery in the narrative, featuring the village boys who go to war with Joan, and a bit of sly mockery of both aristocracy and clergy. Clemens lived by his pen, don't forget!
The Sieur de Conte is what modern critics call a "naive narrator," one whose understanding of his story cannot be accepted by the reader as objective truth or indeed as the whole story. De Conte, for instance, speaks quite credulously of fairies around a tree in Domremy; he has no doubts that the local priest actually exorcized the fairies, thus providing an occasion for the girl Joan to demonstrate her spiritual and intellectual precocity. In literary terms, de Conte's credulity about the fairies prepares the reader for his far more significant `testimony' about the reality of Joan's visions and angelic voices. Likewise, de Conte's naivete is a guise with which Clemens can conceal the caustic skepticism of his alter ego, Mark Twain. Reader, beware! Don't make the fatal error of conflating Clemens with his credulous narrator!
According to de Conte, when Joan finally gains an audience with the Dauphin, she progresses to the sound of silver herald trumpets. Trumpeters were a privileged guild in the 15th C, employed both as ambassadors and spys as well as musicians, so the scene is not utterly fantastical, though a trumpet actually made of silver would be unplayable. But if the historical Jeanne d'Arc heard any sophisticated polyphony or courtly instrumental music, it would been purely by chance. Such music was not being performed in the village of Domremy, where she spent more than the first half of her brief life. Her best chance of hearing such music - unlikely as it is - would have been after she was captured by troops of Philip the Good, Duke of Burgundy from 1419-1467. The two greatest and most renowned composers of Europe at that time were Burgundians -- Guillaume Dufay (1397-1474) and Gilles Binchois (1400-1460). Binchois is known to have been employed in the court chapel of Philip the Good in the 1420s. In fact, Philip was one of the most extravagant patrons of music and the visual arts of his era, an opulence he could afford as the ruler of the richest, most commercially and socially advanced regions of North Europe, including the lands that are now the Netherlands, Belgium, Luxembourg, Alsace-Lorraine, and other 'counties' that are now part of France and Germany all the way to the Swiss border. Burgundy never evolved in a 'nation state' but in the 15th Century it was a sprawling realm of pelf and power. The painters Rogier van der Weyden (1400-1464) and Jan van Eyck (1395-1441) were Burgundians, patronized by Philip the Good and his courtiers, both secular and clerical. Philip himself was a ruler of such stature that it was he who founded the Order of the Golden Fleece, the most exclusive "club" in history, a knightly order of potentates from all of Europe which still exists today.
It's a cinch that Clemens/Twain never heard a note of Burgundian music, nor did anyone else in his lifetime, nor would he have had a glimmer of understanding it. Is that at all relevant? It seems so to me, since Clemens/de Conte virtually `pins the rap' for the martyrdom of Joan on the Burgundians, whom Clemens allows his de Conte to portray as a mere faction of the corrupt French nobility. It's a major deficiency in Clemens's book, if we choose to take it seriously as a historical study, that his spokesman de Conte tells nothing of what he would have known about Burgundy, about its de facto autonomy from France traced back to the decision of Charlemagne to divide his empire among his three sons. Burgundy was essentially the middle third, and the autonomy of the Benelux nations today is a vestige of that decision a millennium ago.
But you'd be right to object that I'm examining this book by the wrong criteria ... deliberately, of course. It isn't historiography; it's hagiography -- biographical testimony of sainthood -- and not so different from the hagiography of the Medieval "Legenda Aurea" except in its flashes of Twainish sarcasm. Hagiography is written for believers, not for skeptics such as we all know Mark Twain to have been. To `believe' this account of Joan's life, as its fictitious narrator insists we should, we need to believe, not so much in the literal fact of Joan's voices and miracles, but in the miraculous intervention of God on behalf of the French kingdom and its dynasty ruler. In short, we need to believe that God was/is a nationalist. Much as I love modern France, I'm not able to believe that God took sides in the 15th C, that God intervened in mystical favor of the nascent French state, which had no better claim than the English and Burgundians to hegemony over Languedoc, Normandy, Savoy, and the culturally distinct lands from Holland to Switzerland that were then Burgundy. France's history of slaughter and rapine against the Albigensians in the previous century, its usurpation of power from the Count of Toulouse, its religious genocide, doesn't seem righteously to support Joan's confidence that God wanted France to expand and nationalize. Therefore, yes, de Conte/Clemens's marginalization of Burgundy and villainization of Philippe le Bon -- Philip the Good, as his own people acclaimed him --seriously compromise the substance of this book.
In the end, what can we be sure of, concerning Joan of Arc? Was God a French partisan? No, that's absurd. Was Joan factually commanded and empowered by God to `lead the French armies' and crown Charles VII as legitimate heir to the kingdom? That's equally absurd. Was Joan of Arc a "Saint"? Yes, in the sense that the Papacy has the keys to Heaven and the mandate to name saints; the word has no other sense in my vocabulary. Was Joan the necessary catalyst of the French military resurgence and eventual triumph? That's a stickier question. Clemens lets his creature de Conte declare so; whether Clemens himself thought more deeply about the question isn't clear. He lived and wrote in an era of `historiography' that explained everything in the Past as the achievements of Great Men ... and a very few Great Women.
Most historians of recents decades have focused on other reasons for the eventual French victory, which didn't become final until 1453, twenty-some years after Joan's death. Already in 1424, the English had suffered a major loss in France to a Scottish army of 5,000 at Bauge. In the same year, the headstrong Duke of Gloucester had led an English invasion of Holland, putting the English at odds with the Duke of Burgundy. Burgundian support for the English was crucial; when the Burgundians withdrew any effective alliance, the English cause was doomed. The population of France was four times that of England, and the territory of France was as vast to the English in the 15th C as Russia was to Napoleon in the 19th C, making winning battles less significant than sustaining an occupation. The English occupiers in northern France were obliged to tie down large contingents of their soldiery in garrisons, thus thinning their outnumbered tactical forces dangerously. In this dry military and political history of the 100 Years War, Joan of Arc gets quizzical notice at most.
So there's a question, it seems, of what Joan of Arc really accomplished. The sober consensus is that she was the most visible expression of the upswelling of French national identity and the engagement fo the French `people' -- the peasantry -- in the war which had been until then essentially a dynastic conflict, urged on by aristocrats on both sides and fought by levies of mercenaries. That analysis credits Joan with converting the dynastic struggle into a religious war, just the `holy cause' that popular French historians have celebrated ever since.
And still, it's hard to know what to think of Joan of Arc. Clemens was hardly the only hagiographer; in fact, I haven't found a single biography of Joan in English that isn't a hagiography! I have a painful suspicion that I'd need to research the literature in German, Spanish, Dutch, or even Swedish to get a more objective account.
The harshest criticism I can make of Samuel Clemens's novelistic biography of Joan is that I have no better idea of her reality, no deeper understanding of the phenomenon of her life, than I had before I read it. My five-star rating of the book is purely a courtesy; it's NOT Mark Twain's best book by a long shot. Clemens's Romance is mildly entertaining but intellectually irrelevant.
I spent the first several pages of Recollections expecting some sly asides and jokes by Twain himself, but he happily quiets his own biting wit in the service of the narrator, a minor noble called Sieur Louis de Conte. Soon enough after starting, I let down my guard and immersed myself in de Conte’s straightforward meticulousness as he describes people and places, and affectionately recounts Joan’s quotidian encounters that reveal her character, her manners and speech, and her absolute conviction. Twain’s probing research into the life of Joan of Arc makes his conceit, in which de Conte is himself a writer of no small talent, utterly convincing. As one court condemned her in a court case, de Conte vindicates her with his own case for the rightness and justice of her leadership. The narrative could easily slip into melodrama or hagiography, but de Conte includes enough comic relief (especially in the characters of the Paladin and Noel Rainguesson, and in a number of small vignettes along the way) and careful recountings of battles and trials that Recollections are neither. Instead, the picture of Joan that emerges is exactly what a Christian saint should be: true to her call in life, inspired by God, patient under duress, yet bold in spiritual and even physical battle. Saint Joan, given flesh by Twain’s pen, truly embodies the Pauline ideal of “cunning as a serpent, but gentle as a dove.”
The outcome, of course, is unchangeable, but the literary journey to Joan’s certain end is well worth the reader’s time, for whatever it may lack in suspense. Whatever the reader’s religious or political leanings (should a reader still be enmeshed in Anglo-Frankish history), the figure of Joan herself is inspiring, and Twain gives pink cheeks, brightly snapping eyes, and a clarion voice to a young woman who died hundreds of years ago. In this biography of an illiterate peasant who acted in faith and courage, Twain’s Recollections makes it easy to understand why grown men would, or would not!, submit themselves to the command of a girl. It’s enough to make even a modern reader a devotee of this humble and courageous saint himself.
Top reviews from other countries
Reviewed in Mexico on May 27, 2020