The Henry Project: The Ancestors of King Henry II of England
Geoffroy (II)
Count of G�tinais, before 979 - 991�7.
Count Geoffroy of G�tinais was a witness to a donation to Saint-P�re de Chartres in 984 ["S. Gausfridi, comitis Wastiniensis." Cart. S.-P�re de Chartres, 1: 90 (#6)]. In an act of 990 of king Hugues Capet for the church of Sainte-Croix d'Orl�ans, count Geoffroy gave his consent ["... beneficium etiam quoddam Gaufredi comitis, quod jam dudum ecclesiae S. Crucis et Arnulfo praesuli, eodem Gaufredo consentiente, ..." RHF 10: 558]. He also appears in November 991 in an act of king Robert ["Beneficium etiam quoddam Gaufridi comitis ..." RHF 10: 573]. He was evidently deceased in 997, when a certain Gau[tier] appears as count [see below].
This count has not always been adequately distinguished from his namesake Geoffroy I "Grisegonelle" (d. 987), count of Anjou. However, the 990 and 991 acts above obviously did not concern Geoffroy Grisegonelle, who was then deceased, and the count of the 985�7 act is explicitly called count of G�tinais. A count Geoffroy appears on 9 June 979, in an act of king Louis V for the church of Sainte-Croix d'Orl�ans ["in pago etiam Blesiaco villam quae vocatur Curtis, quam nuper sepe dictae aecclesiae Odo comes reddidit cum omnibus ad eam pertinentibus, consentiente Hugone Franchorum duce, beneficium etiam quoddam Gauzfredi comitis, quod idem Hugo, Arnulfo ejusdem aecclesiae praesuli, consentiente eodem Gauzfredo, reddidit." Rec. Actes Lothair & Louis V, 171 (#69)]. This count has sometimes been identified as Geoffroy Grisegonelle [e.g., Halphen & Lot in the index to the same act, ibid., 199]. However, since the act was for the church of Sainte-Croix d'Orl�ans, and Orl�ans is near G�tinais, comparison with the 990 act indicates that the 979 act evidently also concerns Geoffroy of G�tinais [Devaux (1885), 74; Saint-Phalle (2000), 231 n. 9].
Date of birth: Unknown.
Place of birth: Unknown.
Date of death: Probably 991�7.
Place of
death: Unknown.
As noted above, Geoffroy was still
alive in November 991. A letter of Abbo of Fleury written in 997
indicates that the count of G�tinais at that time was a certain Wal-
(Gautier?). From this, it has generally been presumed that
Geoffroy was deceased at that time.
Father: Unknown.
Mother: Unknown.
For conjectured origins, see the Commentary
section.
Spouse: B�atrix, daughter of Aubry
II, count of M�con. She m.
(2) Hugues
du Perche.
B�atrix appears in the Life of Gauzlin, abbot of Fleury, as
countess of Ch�teau-Landon (G�tinais) [Vita Gauzlini,
c. 35 (pp. 72-3)], and in the Saint-Aubin genealogies as the
daughter of Aubry [II of M�con] and mother of count Geoffroy of
Ch�teau-Landon [Poupardin (1900), 208 (#6)]. Proof that she was
the same person as the unnamed woman who was married successively
to Geoffroy (II) of G�tinais and Hugues du Perche is given on
the page of count Geoffroy
(III) of G�tinais.
Children:
Aubry (Albericus),
d. probably 1028�1030, count of G�tinais, 1028.
Aubry was count of Ch�teau-Landon
(G�tinais) on 26 May 1028, when a charter of Franco, bishop of
Paris, mentions him, his father Geoffroy, and his two maternal
half-brothers and heirs Geoffroy and Li�taud, sons of Hugues du
Perche ["... Albericum, illius supradicti Gosfredi
filium et heredem, et insuper, faventibus fratribus ipsius
Alberici, filiis Hugonis Pertice, scilicet Gosfredo et Letoldo,
..." Cart. Notre-Dame de Paris, 1: 326-7 (#19); see the
page of Geoffroy
(III) for a full quote; see also the
Commentary section below]. Probably about the same time, he
donated lands situated in the region of Auxerre to the abbey of
Fleury ["Albericus, comes Nandonensium, sui juris
alodum, in Altissioderensi territorio situm, Dei genitricis
Mari� plene devotionis largitus est munere." Vita
Gauzlini, c. 29 (pp. 72-3)]. Not long afterward, Beatrix
donated to the abbey of Fleury as "countess",
suggesting that Aubry was deceased by that time [ibid.; see also
Devaux (1892), 257; Estournet (1928), 121; Settipani (1997),
255]. He is sometimes incorrectly identified as the full brother
of count Geoffroy (III), and sometimes incorrectly combined with
Geoffroy (III) into a supposed count Aubri/Geoffroy of G�tinais.
See the detailed discussion on the page of Geoffroy (III).
Commentary
The identification of count Geoffroy (II) of G�tinais
One difficulty in comparing different accounts of the genealogical relations of Geoffroy is that many early scholars have inadvertenly divided him into two individuals. If the same personal name with the same title appears in two different records separated by a number of years, it is sometimes difficult to determine whether or not the two references involve the same individual. If, for example, the two records are separated by only a decade or so, it will often be concluded, in the absence of contrary information, that they involve the same person. On the other hand, if in addition there is a third record dated in between the other two records which show a man having a different name in possession of the same title, then the two records involving the same name will often be attributed to two different individuals rather than assuming that one individual lost the title and then regained it. Add to this the possibility that the events were placed in the wrong chronological order, and you get the problem as we have it in this case.
A count Geoffroy of G�tinais was a witness to a donation to Saint-P�re de Chartres in 984 ["S. Gausfridi, comitis Wastiniensis." Cart. S.-P�re de Chartres, 1: 90 (#6)]. A 1028 charter of Franco bishop of Paris mentioned a previous donation by Franco's predecessor biship Renaud (Rainaldus) of villas situated "in comitatu Vuastinensi, Gosfredo, comiti Landonensis castri", during the time of a war between Renaud's father count Bouchard of Vend�me and count Eudes of Blois ("... propter vuerram et discordiam que tunc temporis erat inter patrem suum nomine Burchardum, et comitem Odonem ..."), the principle event of which was the siege of Melun [Cart. Notre-Dame de Paris, 1: 326-7 (#19)]. The obvious conclusion is that at the time of the war between Bouchard and Eudes, the count of G�tinais was named Geoffroy. This latter Geoffroy was the father of the Aubry who was count in 1028. The third record of interest is a letter of Abbo of Fleury written in 997 to Pope Gregory V, which complained that Qauz[-], nepos of count Wal[-] of Ch�teau-Landon, was ravaging church lands ["... Est quidem Qauz, nepos Wal comitis de castro Nantonis, ..." PL 139: 421; see below].
At one time it was common to place the siege of Melun in 999. For someone who believed that to be the correct year, the natural interpretation of the evidence would be to identify the Geoffroy who was count at the time of the siege of Melun with Qauz[-], nepos of Wal[-] (presumably Gautier), count in 997, and to make him distinct from the Geoffroy who was count in 984. However, it is now generally accepted that the siege of Melun took place in 991 [for the arguments in favor of 991, see, e.g., Lex (1892), 64-72]. This changes matters completely, making it very probable that the Geoffroy who was count at the time of the siege of Melun, father of count Aubry, was the same as the Geoffroy who was count in 984 (and, as noted above, probably also in 979). Thus, some of the earlier authors have unintentionally made two count Geoffroys out of one, and this needs to be remembered when one tries to compare the different accounts.
The counts of G�tinais (Ch�teau-Landon)
In order to follow the conjectures which have been made regarding the family of Geoffroy, a brief outline of the known tenth and early eleventh century counts of G�tinais will be useful. What little is known about the counts of G�tinais (sometimes called counts of Ch�teau-Landon, after their principle stronghold) has to be pieced together from various scraps of information which are insufficient to document a continuous succession or genealogy of these counts. The counts of G�tinais did not identify themselves with numbers (i.e., I, II, etc.) during their own lifetime. Some historians have assigned numbers to the counts named Geoffroy in order to distinguish them, but these do not always agree, and there is no standard numbering of the counts Geoffroy of G�tinais. The numbers adopted here for the counts Geoffroy are those of Settipani (1997), given in parentheses to emphasize their tentative and uncertain nature. Starting with the tenth century, and continuing through Geoffroy (III) (d. 1042�5), we get the following list of known counts of G�tinais/Ch�teau-Landon.
Geoffroy (I), count [of G�tinais?, of
Nevers?], bef. 933 - aft. 941
In an act of 933 at Auxerre, a
count Geoffroy, a vassal of king Raoul, is mentioned in
connection with 60 manses in the comitatus of G�tinais
["... Gauzfredus comes ... cum mansis LX ex Wastinensi
comitatu, ... Actum Autissiodoro." RHF 9: 579;
Settipani (1997), 233, gives the date 935]. In November 941, a
count Geoffroy, presumably the same man, witnesses a donation of
land in G�tinais to Saint-Beno�t-sur-Loire ["... in
Guastinensi pago ... Sig. Gauzfredi comitis ..." Cart.
Saint-Beno�t-sur-Loire, 1: 121-2 (#47)]. Although Geoffroy
appears in both cases with regard to land in G�tinais, he is not
specifically called count of G�tinais. His appearance in 933 in
an act at Auxerre suggests a possible Burgundian connection.
Thus, it has been suggested that this count Geoffroy was the same
person as the count Geoffroy who appears at Nevers with his wife
Ava on 8 April 936 ["... ego, in Dei nomine, Gauzfredus,
disponente Deo comes, et uxor mea Ava, ... Signum Gauzfredi
comitis, et signum Avane, uxoris ejus, ... Actum Nivernis
civitate publice ..." Cart. Cluny, 1: 435 (#446)]. This
count also appears in a charter of June 936 ["... ego
Gauzfredus, ..., et uxor mea Ava, ... Signum Gauzfredi comitis,
et signum Av�, uxoris ejus, ..." Cart. Cluny, 1: 438-9
(#449)] and in one of July & September 940 with his wife Ava
and brother Gauzbert ["ego, in Dei nomine, Gauzfredus
comes et conjux mea Ava, ... pro remedio animarum nostrarum et
fratris mei Gauzberti, ... Signum Gauzfredi commitis, et Ave,
uxoris ejus, ..." Cart. Cluny, 1: 496-8 (#511)]. This
is probably also the count Geoffroy who appears in a charter of
Li�taud, count of M�con on 12 April 935 ["S. Gaufredi
comitis." Cart. Cluny, 1: 421 (#432), the exact date
might not be correct]. He has also been identified with the
Geoffroy, viscount of Orl�ans who appears in May 942 (or 939?)
in a charter of Hugues le Grand for Saint-Julien de Tours ["S.
Gaufredi Aurelianensium vicecomitis. ... Data mense maio ... anno
scilicet Dominic� incarnationis DCCCCXLII� sive anno tertio
regnante Hludovico rege." Rec. Chron. Touraine, 234;
also RHF 9: 723, dating it to May 939, with the words "anno
scilicet Dominic� incarnationis DCCCCXLII� sive"
missing].
Geoffroy (II), count of G�tinais, bef.
979 - 991�7
As already outlined above, count Geoffroy
appears in acts of 9 June 979, 984 (as count of G�tinais), 990,
and November 991. Since he was count at the time of the siege of
Melun in 991, he is clearly identified as being the father of the
Aubry who was count in 1028. As noted above, he has sometimes
been incorrectly split into two Geoffroys, one before and one
after count Wal[-].
Wal[-] (prob.
Gautier), count of Ch�teau-Landon, 997
A letter of Abbo of Fleury written in 997
to Pope Gregory V complained that Qauz[-], nepos
of count Wal[-] of Ch�teau-Landon (who was in Rome at
the time), was ravaging church lands ["... Est quidem
Qauz, nepos Wal comitis de castro Nantonis, qui devastat
possessiones nostri monasterii; de quo precor ut cum ipso Wal,
qui nunc Romae est, loquamini, minando contra ejus nepotem virgam
excommunicationis nisi resipuerit, si inveni gratiam in oculis
vestris; ..." PL 139: 421]. The two abbreviated names Qauz[-]
and Wal[-] are generally interpreted as Walterius
(Gautier) and Q[u]auzfridus
(Geoffroy).
[As noted above, Geoffroy, father of the Aubry who was count in 1028, is erroneously placed here by some. As a separate matter, we must leave open the possibility that Qauz[-], the nepos of Wal[-], was count at some point between 997 and 1028, in which case the Geoffroys would probably have to be renumbered. However, there is no direct evidence that Qauz[-] was ever count.]
Aubry, count of Ch�teau-Landon, 1028
As indicated above, he was count
of Ch�teau-Landon (G�tinais) on 26 May 1028. Probably about the
same time, he donated lands situated in the region of Auxerre to
the abbey of Fleury.
Geoffroy (III), count of
Ch�teau-Landon, d. 1042�5.
No known document during
Geoffroy's tenure mentions him as count. He is mentioned as heir
in the 1028 charter of his maternal half-brother Aubry, and the
genealogy from Saint-Aubin evidently composed under his grandson
calls him count of Ch�teau-Landon ("... ex Beatrice
Gosfridus comes de Castello Landonensi ...", see
above). In an attempt to reconcile contradictory evidence which
would make Aubry the father of counts Geoffroy "le
Barbu" and Foulques "le R�chin" of Anjou,
Geoffroy has often been incorrectly identified with his brother
by combining them into a double-named count
"Aubry-Geoffroy" of G�tinais. This is discussed in
detail on the page of Geoffroy (III).
The parentage of Geoffroy (II)
Little material is available for a genealogy of the counts of G�tinais. Often, attempts to give such a genealogy have been little more than a string of conjectures [e.g., Chaume (1925), 532 (table 3)]. The meager raw data on which a genealogy of the counts of G�tinais could be based mainly include the 997 letter of Abbo of Fleury, the 1028 charter of bishop Franco of Paris, and the Saint-Aubin genealogies, all mentioned above. The data given by these sources is shown in tabular form on the page of Geoffroy (III). However, none of these sources tell us the parentage of Geoffroy (II). The most recent known count of G�tinais prior to Geoffroy (II) is Geoffroy (I), who appears 38 years before the earliest known appearance of Geoffroy (II). Several sceanrios have been suggested for the origin of Geoffroy (II).
Scenario 1: Supposed connections with the viscounts of Orl�ans
Ch�teau-Landon, the main stronghold of G�tinais, is close to the city of Orl�ans. Thus, in 1871, �mile Mabille noted that the known tenth century viscounts of Orl�ans were named Geoffroy (942) and Aubry (957, 966), the same names borne by later counts of G�tinais [Mabille (1871), lxxxiv-lxxxvi]. This led to the conjecture that this Aubry was the father of Geoffroy (II):
Conjectured father (possible
but unlikely):
Aubry, fl. 957-966, viscount of Orl�ans.
Aubry signed an act of Thibaud ("le
Tricheur"), count of Tours, on 31 March 957 ["Signum
Alberici Aurelianensium vicecomitis." Mabille (1871),
cx (Pi�ces justificatives #10)] and and act of Geoffroy I
Grisegonnelle on 10 June 966 ["sig. Alberigi
Aurelianensis vicecomitis" Mabille (1871), lxix, n. 1].
Chaume calls Aubry count of G�tinais, for which there is no
evidence [Chaume (1925), 532 (table 3)].
Mabille was writing at a time when scholars had not yet assembled the scanty charter evidence for counts of G�tinais. He was unwilling to decide between Aubry and Geoffroy as the name of the count of G�tinais who was father of the Angevin counts Geoffroy III le Barbu and Foulques IV le R�chin [see the page of Geoffroy (III) for the discussion of this problem], and he followed M�nage's Histoire de Sabl� in identifying the previous count of G�tinais as Geoffroy, husband of B�trix de M�con [M�nage (1683), 118; Mabille (1871), lxxxvi]. Unaware of any other tenth century counts of G�tinais, he linked these counts to the two viscounts of Orl�ans, Geoffroy (942) and Aubry (957, 966). Mabille also suggested that the Geoffroy of 942 was the son of an otherwise unidentifed Aubry who appears in a charter of 886 [Mabille (1871), lix, lxxxv], a supposition which is very slimly based even if the Orl�ans-G�tinais connection is valid. Devaux and Espinay argued against the Orl�ans-G�tinais connection, on the basis that Orl�ans and G�tinais were administered separately and that the similarity of names might only be a coincidence [Devaux (1885), 72-3; Espinay (1898), 37-9]. Indeed, the name of count Aubry of G�tinais is clearly explained as coming from his maternal grandfather count Aubry II of M�con, which considerably weakens the onomastic argument. Chaume not only accepted the connection, but elaborated on it considerably [Chaume (1925), 533, see below]. In 1997, Settipani accepted as a working hypothesis that Geoffroy (II) was a son of Aubry (957, 966), viscount of Orl�ans and grandson of Geoffroy (I) [Settipani (1997), 244], but later abandoned it in favor of a connection with the counts of Amiens, Valois, and Vexin (see Scenario 2 below) [Settipani (2000), 249]. While this scenario is possible, it seems less likely than the connection with the counts of Amiens suggested in Scenario 2.
Falsely attributed
father (did not exist): Aubry, fl. ca. 990.
Like others who accepted that count
Geoffroy husband of B�atrix de M�con was living [see comments
above], Chaume divided count Geoffroy (II) into two different
men, a count Geoffroy II (979-985) and a count Geoffroy III
husband of B�atrix, making the two grandfather and grandson,
with an Aubry "III" as the intervening generation
[Chaume (1925), 532 (table 3)]. It is difficult to regard this
"Aubry" as anything other than a fabrication of Chaume,
who evidently wanted the generations of his conjectured genealogy
to alternate between the names Aubry and Geoffroy.
Scenario 2: Supposed connections with the counts of Amiens, Valois, and Vexin
It has been suggested that the count Wal[-] of G�tinais who appears in 997 should be identified with either count Gautier I or his son Gautier II, of the family of counts of Amiens, Valois, and Vexin [Guillot (1973), 3; Bachrach (1993), 65; Saint-Phalle (2000), 233-5, 242-4; Settipani (2000), 247-9; Saint-Phalle (2000), 233 & n. 18 attributes the suggestion to Lot (1891), 116, but no such suggestion appears on the cited page].
Conjectured father (possible): Gautier I, d. after 992, count of
Amiens, Valois, and Vexin.
Conjectured mother (possible): Ad�le, probable
daughter of Foulques
II, countof Anjou.
Conjectured brother
(possible):
Gautier II (Wal[-]),
fl. 997, count of Amiens, Valois, and Vexin; count of G�tinais.
The most common variation of this scenario
would identify count Geoffroy (II) of G�tinais with the Geoffroy
who appears in a 988 charter of king Hugues Capet as the son of
count Gautier I of Amiens ["S. Walteri Comitis
Ambianensis ac filiorum ejus Walteri, Gotfredi, Rodulfi."
RHF 10: 553 (#4)]. Count Wal[-] of Ch�teau-Landon is
identified with Gautier II as a brother of Geoffroy [Bachrach
(1985), 16; Bachrach (1993), 65; Settipani (2000), 247-9]. As a
comital dynasty in which reasonable candidates having both of the
names Geoffroy and Gautier appear, the counts of Amiens, Valois,
and Vexin provide a very plausible origin for count Geoffroy (II)
of G�tinais. Also, when Hugues Capet (then duke) gave a charter
in favor of Sainte-Croix d'Orl�ans in 975, several of "his
counts" ("Comitibus nostris") were among
those who consented, including Gautier I and his sons Gautier and
Raoul ["S. Wauterii Comitis. S. Waltherii et Radulphi
filiorum ejus." RHF 9: 733]. Although this does not
prove a G�tinais connection for Gautier I, such a connection
would explain why he and two of his sons were witnissing an
Orl�ans charter. Settipani also conjectures that Gerberge, wife
of Foulques II of Anjou, was a daughter of count Geoffroy (I) of
G�tinais [Settipani (1997), 240-1], which, if true, would
explain why the counts of Amiens had a claim to G�tinais, and
would make Geoffroy (II) a great-grandson of Geoffroy (I). While
this scenario rests to a large degree on conjecture, it has the
advantage of plausibility.
Conjectured father (almost
certainly false):
Geoffroy, fl. 987-8, son of Gautier I, count of Amiens,
Valois, and Vexin.
(a mistake in composing a
genealogical table?)
In a genealogical table, Bachrach places
count Geoffroy of G�tinais, paternal grandfather of counts
Geoffroy III le Barbu and Foulques IV le R�chin of Anjou, as a
son of Geoffroy, son of count Gautier (Walter) I of Amiens,
Valois, and Vexin [Bachrach (1993), 264], in apparent
disagreement with the earlier text of the same book [ibid., 65]
and with an earlier article by the same author [Bachrach (1985),
16]. The statement of the table may not have been intended by the
author, and could just be a mistake in composing the genealogical
table. In any case, it is unlikely that Gautier I, born ca. 925
or not long before [see Grierson (1939), 107], would have a
grandson through a younger son old enough to be a count in 979,
and this link can be rejected.
Scenario 3: B�atrix de M�con as the supposed heiress of G�tinais
The main point of this scenario is the suggestion that the inheritance to G�tinais came through Geoffroy (II)'s wife B�atrix de M�con [Saint-Phalle (2000)]. The logic behind this suggestion is that two sons of B�atrix by different husbands became counts of G�tinais. In this scenario, Geoffroy (II) is of unknown parentage, and only becomes count of G�tinais by right of his marriage to B�atrix. Count Wal[-] of G�tinais is identified with the aged Gautier I, count of Amiens, Valois, and Vexin (b. ca. 925), who was supposedly a husband of B�atrix in between her marriages to Geoffroy (II) and Hugues du Perche, and the nepos Qauz[-] is made to be a grandson of Gautier I via an otherwise unspecified son. [Saint-Phalle (2000), 233-5]. This scenario is very unlikely [see the page of B�atrix for more details].
Scenario 4: None of the above
Another possibility worth mentioning is that there may have been a connection between Geoffroy (I) and Geoffroy (II) which came through neither the viscounts of Orl�ans nor the counts of Amiens. Although it seems chronologically less likely, Geoffroy (I) could even have been the father of Geoffroy (II):
Conjectured father or
grandfather: Geoffroy (I),
fl. 933-941, count [of G�tinais?].
Of course, if Geoffroy (II) were the
grandson of Geoffroy (I), then this suggestion would be
consistent with Scenario 1.
Conjectured son (possible):
(perhaps
by an earlier wife)
Geoffroy (Qauz-),
fl. 997, nepos of Wal-,
count of Ch�teau-Landon.
The Qauz- who appears in the 997 letter of Abbo of
Fleury as ravaging church lands (see above) is difficult to
identify, because he cannot reasonably be identified with count
Geoffroy (II) of G�tinais (who appears to have been deceased),
and he couldn't be Geoffroy (III), who was either an infant or
not yet born. He would be placed by Settipani as a son of
B�atrix by her first husband Geoffroy of G�tinais (who is
identified as the son of Gautier I of Amiens, and brother of
Gautier II, whom Settipani identifies as the count Wal-
of 997) [Settipani (2000), 247-9]. Note that this conjecture
would give B�atrix two sons of the same name (by different
husbands), and would probably require B�atrix to be old enough
to be a daughter of an earlier marriage of Aubry.
Conjectured daughter (very
speculative):
NN, m. Guy,
joint count of M�con, son of Otte-Guillaume, count of Burgundy and M�con.
[Chaume (1925), 1: 465, n.2; 533 (table 3); see the page of B�atrix for more details]
Conjectured daughter (improbable):
NN, m. Ebles
de Poitou, son of Guillaume
II (IV) "Fier-�-Bras", count of Poitou and
duke of Aquitaine.
(conjectured mother of Ebles I, count of
Roucy and archbishop of Reims and Li�taud de Marle)
[Saint-Phalle (2000), 242 (table 1)] Mathieu has a similar
conjecture where the wife of Ebles de Poitou would be placed as a
sister rather than a daughter of B�atrix, and that scenario is
chronologically much more plausible [Mathieu (2000); see the page
of Aubry II for more details].
Falsely attributed son:
Geoffroy (III),
d. 30 April 1042�5, count of G�tinais;
m. Ermengarde, d. 1076, heiress of Anjou.
Some secondary sources place Geoffroy (III)
as a son of Geoffroy (II) [Chaume (1925), 1: 533 (table 3);
Halphen (1906), 134 (by implication); Bouchard (1981), 511
(Figure 2); Bachrach (1993), 264]. However, no early sources
state that relationship, and Geoffroy (III) was in fact a son of
B�atrix, wife of Geoffroy (II), by her second husband Hugues du
Perche [see the page of Geoffroy (III) for a detailed
discussion].
Bibliography
Bachrach (1985) = B. Bachrach, "Geoffrey Greymantle, count of the Angevins, 960-987: a study in French politics", Studies in Medieval and Renaissance History 17 (n.s. 7, 1985): 3-65.
Bachrach (1993) = B. Bachrach, Fulk Nerra, the Neo-Roman Consul, 987-1040 (University of California Press, 1993).
Bouchard (1981) = Constance B. Bouchard, "The Origins of the French Nobility: A Reassessment", The American Historical Review 86 (1981): 501-532.
Cart. Cluny = A. Bernard & A. Bruel, Recueil des chartes de l'abbaye de Cluny, 6 vols., (Paris, 1876-1903).
Cart. Notre-Dame de Paris = Benjamin Gu�rard, Cartulaire de l'�glise Notre-Dame de Paris, 4 vols. (Paris, 1850).
Cart. S.-Beno�t-sur-Loire = Maurice Prou & Alexandre Vidier, eds., Recueil des chartes de l'abbaye de Saint-Beno�t-sur-Loire, 2 vols. (Paris, 1900-12).
Cart. S.-P�re de Chartres = M Gu�rard, Cartulaire de l'Abbaye de Saint-P�re de Chartres, 2 vols. (Paris, 1840).
Chaume (1925) = Maurice Chaume, Les origines du duch� de Bourgogne, 4 vols. (Dijon, 1925).
Devaux (1885) = J. Devaux, "�tude chronologique sur les comtes de G�tinais", Annales de la Soci�t� Historique & Arch�ologique du G�tinais 3 (1885): 55-83.
Devaux (1892) = J. Devaux, "Origines G�tinaises" (parts I & II), Annales de la Soci�t� Historique & Arch�ologique du G�tinais 10 (1892): 241-260.
Espinay (1898) = G. d'Espinay, "Les comtes du G�tinais", M�moires de la Soci�t� nationale d'agriculture, sciences & arts 5ser. 1 (1898): 25-42.
Grierson (1939) = Philip Grierson, "L'origin des comtes d'Amiens, Valois et Vexin", Le Moyen Age 49 (1939): 81-125.
Guillot (1972) = Olivier Guillot, Le Comte d'Anjou et son entourage au XIe si�cle (Paris, 1972).
Halphen (1906) = Louis Halphen, Le comt� d'Anjou au XIe si�cle (Paris, 1906).
Lex (1892) = L�once Lex, Eudes, comte de Blois, de Tours, de Chartres, de Troyes et de Meaux (995-1037) et Thibaud, son fr�re (995-1004) (Troyes, 1892).
Lot (1891) = Ferdinand Lot, Les derniers Carolingiens (Paris, 1891).
Mabille (1871) = �mile Mabille, Introduction au Chroniques des Comtes d'Anjou (Soci�t� de l'Histoire de France, vol. 155, Paris, 1871).
Mathieu (2000) = Jean-No�l Mathieu, "La succession au comt� de Roucy aux environs de l'an mil. Les origines de l'archev�que de Reims Ebles (1021-1033)", in Keats-Rohan & Settipani, eds., Onomastique et Parent� dans l'Occident m�di�val (Oxford, 2000), 75-84.
M�nage (1683) = M�nage, Histoire de Sabl�. premi�re partie (Paris, 1683).
PL = P. Migne, Patrologiae Cursus Completus, series Latina, 221 vols. (Paris, 1844-1859).
Poupardin (1900) = Ren� Poupardin, "G�n�alogies angevines du XIe si�cle", M�langes d'Arch�ologie et d'Histoire (Paris, Rome) 20 (1900):199-208.
Rec. Actes Lothair & Louis V = Louis Halphen & Ferdinand Lot, eds., Recueil des actes de Lothaire et de Louis V rois de France (Paris, 1908).
Rec. Chron. Touraine = Andr� Salmon, ed., Recueil de Chroniques de Touraine (Tours, 1854).
RHF = Recueil des historiens des Gaules et de la France.
Saint-Phalle (2000) = Edouard de Saint-Phalle, "Les comtes de G�tinais aux Xe et XIe si�cles", in Keats-Rohan & Settipani, eds., Onomastique et Parent� dans l'Occident m�di�val (Oxford, 2000), 230-246.
Settipani (1997) = Christian Settipani, "Les comtes d'Anjou et leur alliances aux Xe et XIe si�cles", in K. S. B. Keats-Rohan, ed., Family Trees and the Roots of Politics (Woodbridge, Suffolk, 1997): 211-267.
Settipani (2000) = Christian Settipani, "Les vicomtes de Ch�teaudun et leur alli�s", in Keats-Rohan & Settipani, eds., Onomastique et Parent� dans l'Occident m�di�val (Oxford, 2000), 247-261.
Vita Gauzlini = Robert-Henri Bautier & Gillette Labory, ed. & trans., Andr� de Fleury, Vie de Gauzlin, abb� de Fleury (Vita Gauzlini abbatis Floriacensis monasterii) (Paris, 1969). Edited previously by L�opold Delisle, "Vie de Gauzlin, abb� de Fleuri et archev�que de Bourges, par Andr� de Fleuri", M�moires de la Soci�t� Arch�ologique de l'Orl�anais 2 (1853): 257-322.
Compiled by Stewart Baldwin
First uploaded 24 January 2011.