Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet or computer – no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
OK
The War Between the Generals: Inside the Allied High Command Hardcover – 10 Feb. 2010
Purchase options and add-ons
- Print length456 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherFocal Point Publications
- Publication date10 Feb. 2010
- Dimensions15.88 x 3.56 x 23.5 cm
- ISBN-101872197280
- ISBN-13978-1872197289
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Product details
- Publisher : Focal Point Publications; Focal Point Classic Reissue edition (10 Feb. 2010)
- Language : English
- Hardcover : 456 pages
- ISBN-10 : 1872197280
- ISBN-13 : 978-1872197289
- Dimensions : 15.88 x 3.56 x 23.5 cm
- Best Sellers Rank: 4,674,514 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- 117,040 in General Humour
- Customer reviews:
About the author
Born on March 24, 1938, Irving is the son of a Royal Navy commander. He attended Imperial College of Science & Technology and University College London and later spent time in Germany working in a Thyssen steel mill to improve his German language skills. He is known for his extensive archival research and has published around thirty books, with notable works including “Hitler’s War”, “The Trail of the Fox: The Life of Field-Marshal Rommel“, and “Göring: a Biography”. He has also translated several works by other authors.
David Irving lived for over thirty years in Grosvenor Square, London, and is the father of five daughters. His youngest daughter is Jessica, while his other daughters are Josephine (who tragically passed away in 1999), Pilar, Paloma, and Beatrice. Irving’s first major publication was “The Destruction of Dresden” in 1963, which became a bestseller. He has also written works only published in German, such as documentation on the 1944 Morgenthau Plan, and continues to work on historical biographies.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings, help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyses reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from United Kingdom
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Really an amazing book
Top reviews from other countries
The key players are Churchill, Eisenhower, Patton, Bradley, Montgomery, Spaatz, DeGaulle, Tedder, and Leigh-Mallory who get the most attention by Irving. He does touch on the other subordinates of three star and a few division commanders of two star rank as necessary.
This is my third book by Irving, and I found this a departure from the style of his Rommel and Milch books, which of course were more narrowly focused on these Marshals. The reader will soon realize this is an immense task that Irving accomplished; putting proper context and coverage of all the events and how these personalities navigated through the events and through each other.
One of the great myths Irving dispels is that D-Day was a well-executed invasion. Patton, for example, did not think so. He felt the landing area was too narrow, and would allow the Germans to more easily contain it and defeat it. Irving also well shows that Eisenhower, Bradley, and Montgomery were following a path of containment by the Germans with their slow and careful movement inland. By July 1944, the Germans were starting to move enough reinforcements into the area, and Eisenhower was less confident a war of movement would be possible as the Germans were punishing the Allied formations more and more. He made the comment at this time, he wished his leaders were like Patton, and it was at this time he decided to make 3rd Army operational and let Patton lead it. It was the use of Patton and his different mindset who got movement going. Irving strongly highlights Patton as the best the Allies had, and it was his movements that well showed Bradley and Montgomery and Eisenhower were entirely too hesitant. A great quote by Patton Irving chose was: “One should never penalize a commander for mistakes due to audacity.” In contrast to this, a surprising comment by Montgomery at the start of the Battle of the Bulge, well exemplifies the diffference. He wrote to Churchill concerned that “if the Germans push us out again, (from Europe) we can’t go through Dunkirk this time, they hold that this time.”
Irving also exemplifies the qualities of the German military, and how professionally it conducted itself, despite the misguided Fȕhrer directives to hold ground and not allow it to operationally maneuver (resulting in the loss of masses of troops and material in the Falaise pocket). It was the Germans, who took great pains to care for the French civilian population casualties from the Allied bombing campaign. “The Germans had prepared forty thousand extra hospital beds throughout northern France, with twenty-eight thousand more standing by in Paris and Brussels.”
It is probably these aspects of the war that Irving brings out in his books that his detractors hate. Things that prove the German Wehrmacht were not bad guys, but men of honor who felt a responsibility for the French people as occupiers. Or how Patton “came to admire the Germans, the very people he had been fighting. Everything he saw of Russians, Poles, and Jews aroused loathing in him.” In August 1944 Patton wrote his wife, “The stuff in the papers about fraternization is all wet…writing done by Jews to get revenge…” The Patton papers Irving brings out extensively in his work, and he hides nothing.
Other than simply printing the unvarnished truth about what these great men thought of each other at times, and what they thought of the situations they were in during the campaigns, seems to be what Irving’s critics are against. There is nothing Irving writes (as his own opinion) about any group of people or nationality that is derogatory in this work or the other two Irving books I have read. In fact his manner if writing is sophisticated and clean as a whistle.
My only complaint is that there were a few teasers in the last pages that he did not elaborate on, such as what Eisenhower's private diary revealed about Churchill, Montgomery and others. What part(s) of "Crusade in Europe" caused the furor in Great Britain after the war? He stated that this occurred but doesn't explain why. Ike apparently had a "red-hot" secret file on Montgomery...what was in it? Montgomery's COS DeGuingand is said to have lots of damaging info on both Ike and Montgomery but none of it is revealed. Monty and Ike were said to have kept up a years-long correspondence which became "petty and cantankerous" - I'd have liked to read more about that correspondence.
I enjoyed the book very much and if someone knows the answers to subject matter that was left hanging in this one, there is yet another interesting book to be written on this subject.