Dr. John Campbell

A Hearing with Dr. Anthony Fauci https://oversight.house.gov/hearing/a-hearing-with-dr-anthony-fauci/

Important issues of life and death. Thanks to Neil Oliver and the GB News team.

March 2020 Paramedic stress https://www.covid19inquiry.scot/sites/default/files/ev-documents/sci-wt0354-000001.pdf Robert Pollock Toe tagging letter. Discussions around age group, 70+ initially, discussion of over 50s Tough times ahead, would be supported Implementation unclear, but caused stress and pressures Clinical Adviser Paramedic, worked as a frontline paramedic during the pandemic. Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) 26. There was reporting in the media of the "toe tagging" of patients by age group which is wording for "do not try too hard to resuscitate them" over a certain age. Scottish Ambulance Service employees received a letter by email on Thursday 26 March 2020 from the Health and Care Professions Council which stipulated to every registrant that they realised there would be difficult decisions to be made by healthcare professionals, but they would be given full support to make decisions out with normal protocols. 27. … ordinarily, efforts were made to try and resuscitate every single person that has a feasible chance of success. However, the Health and Care Professional Council basically indicated that if employees did not do that on these occasions to coincide with the government statement, then they would fully support employees for any challenges employees may face as healthcare professionals. 28. This was very frightening for workers who have family members in that age group and it caused a lot of concern and anxiety for people who were used to doing their best to preserve life. The process of resuscitation has evolved, and we have a high success rate. This did not go down well with members. In addition, there were discussions about rumours within meetings with the Scottish Ambulance Service that the government had a plan to reduce the age group to those over 50s if Covid levels reached their expected peak and the plan for over 70s did not result in a significant enough drop in medical demand, with ages dropping depending on numbers coming through hospital. 29. Staff morale was severely affected, as they were trained to preserve life, they were paid lifesavers but at the time, they were told to do the complete opposite. This terrified staff that they might have to do this against their normal training and their normal desire to help. This was not a process that anyone welcomed.

Professor Colleen Aldous is a medical researcher in South Africa, her main work in addition to her own research is supervision of clinical doctors who are undertaking research. Link to original paper, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/378624193_Wheel_Replacing_Pyramid_Better_Paradigm_Representing_Totality_of_Evidence-Based_Medicine https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Wheel-Replacing-Pyramid%3A-Better-Paradigm-Totality-Aldous-Dancis/72f1d5b3bd735eae69de57de6f8588cb5819098a

By definition, these serious adverse events lead to either death, are life-threatening, require inpatient (prolongation of) hospitalisation, cause persistent/significant disability/incapacity, concern a congenital anomaly/birth defect or include a medically important event according to medical judgement Covid vaccines may have helped fuel rise in excess deaths Experts call for more research into side effects and possible links to mortality rates https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/06/04/covid-vaccines-may-have-helped-fuel-rise-in-excess-deaths/ https://medicalxpress.com/news/2024-06-high-excess-death-west-years.html Competing interests: None declared. https://bmjpublichealth.bmj.com/content/2/1/e000282 Excess mortality has remained high in the Western World for three consecutive years, despite the implementation of containment measures and COVID-19 vaccines. This raises serious concerns. Government leaders and policymakers need to thoroughly investigate the underlying causes of persistent excess mortality. Insight into excess death rates in years following WHO’s pandemic declaration is crucial for government leaders and policymakers to evaluate their health crisis policies. This study explores excess mortality in the Western World from 2020 until 2022. Methods All-cause mortality reports, ‘Our World in Data’ 47 western countries Comparator Historical death data in a country from 2015 until 2019 Total excess deaths, 1 January 2020 until 31 December 2022 3,098,456 from Excess mortality 2021, 42 countries (89%) Excess mortality 2022, 43 countries (91%) Excess deaths 2020, 1,033,122 excess deaths (P-score 11.4%) 2021, 1,256,942 excess deaths (P-score 13.8%) 2022, 808,392 excess deaths (P-score 8.8%) Conclusions Excess mortality has remained high in the Western World for three consecutive years, despite the implementation of containment measures and COVID-19 vaccines. This raises serious concerns. Government leaders and policymakers need to thoroughly investigate underlying causes of persistent excess mortality. More information The secondary analysis of the placebo-controlled, phase III randomised clinical trials of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines showed that the Pfizer trial had a 36% higher risk of serious adverse events in the vaccine group. The authors of the secondary analysis point out that most of these serious adverse events concern common clinical conditions, for example, ischaemic stroke, acute coronary syndrome and brain haemorrhage. This commonality hinders clinical suspicion and consequently its detection as adverse vaccine reactions These reactions included cardiovascular diseases, coagulation, haemorrhages, gastrointestinal events and thromboses. Numerous studies reported that COVID-19 vaccination may induce myocarditis, pericarditis and autoimmune diseases. Postmortem examinations have also ascribed myocarditis, encephalitis, immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia, intracranial haemorrhage and diffuse thrombosis to COVID-19 vaccinations. pulmonary embolism, acute myocardial infarction, immune thrombocytopenia and disseminated intravascular coagulation.

Download a free copy of VITAMIN D3 and the Great Biology Reset, by Professor David Anderson and Dr David Grimes. https://dgreatbiologyreset.com/#download Dr Grime’s book to introduce the importance of vitamin D https://yorkbookshop.com/health-and-personal-development/307-vitamin-d-deficiency-and-covid-19-its-central-role-in-a-world-pandemic.html Welcome to Professor David Coussmaker Anderson, who has had a lifetime in medicine, consultant physician, professor of endocrinology, medical researcher, medical author, medical teacher and lecturer. Member of the royal society of medicine, member of the American endocrine society … we could go on.

If you would like to donate to the work in New Hope Children’s Centre, 100% of donations go directly to the project, we currently spend 0% on admin. https://www.paypal.com/donate/?hosted_button_id=XS59XPZ527YFL Adam Stachura- Director of AGE Scotland https://www.covid19inquiry.scot/sites/default/files/ev-documents/sci-wt0214-000001.pdf As an example, somebody got in touch with us later on in 2020 who was concerned about their grandfather who is a veteran. We understand from this exchange that paramedics arrived at his door one day and they handed him a bit of paper and said, "you need to keep this by your bed". It was a DNACPR decision document or slip. The slip was signed by a clinician that said discussion had been had with patient and reason was just two words "communication difficulties". (Presumably, linked to his hearing loss). In this instance the DNACPR was not about them having any condition that would mean there is substantial or significant underlying health condition, which would be challenging if they contracted COVID; they were being written off because it was hard to communicate with them. Even if it was the case that someone might face difficulties if they contracted COVID-19, why on earth is there a pre-emptive DNACPR? And particularly so with no discussion or any form of dignified process for the recipient. …. we had a sense that this was also be happening in care homes, where all residents were having DNACPR decisions issued in a blanket manner, not on an individual basis. I heard of examples where there were cases of COVID in care homes, a medical response was not forthcoming. COVID was simply going to go through the care home and there was not the resources to help everyone. And it would be said that "we're not transferring you to hospital because you're in a sort of a safe place. We'll try and manage your condition as best we can in the care home environment". We also found examples of people who upon leaving hospital found DNACPR decisions in their discharge papers without any discussion having been had with them. The box was ticked which said they had had a discussion, where in fact none was. It was the end of May 2020, I think, when it was becoming apparent that there were so many of these instances. Use free download link- https://ufile.io/xp4acnuj

Take the free cognative function test yourself, foodforthebrain.org Direct order for Patrick's book Upgrade Your brain, https://foodforthebrain.org/product/upgrade-your-brain-book-preorder/ Amazon link for the book for people outside of the UK, https://www.amazon.co.uk/Upgrade-Your-Brain-Unlock-Potential/dp/0008661200?crid=31ZSV4O2RLSZP&dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.TQCWZQW06kHFWQKwo5iRI2IxK8N0jqHbvIH0M4RoXWHBV7I7dcEmxFhLDMTt3sVg0klSKQ7zb_--xje-F8T7OYxnnnkY3XNCKPS0asRb50IqqtaUjaorcyaR2ovSBQjn9OapQ-Vs5g6n8e1w3j7Iy7mhimPWRTc8oon9JFYXEN42ewMqtVyotjrjSl_iwBPT9Yv8y_BTjBU0AwrnmNZlC4I4uKVLmFIe9wbpMzmkDB4.7PPF8_cw_7l7wc81AMKISHxUGvDsOy5geU3O8JBvMf0&dib_tag=se&keywords=upgrade+your+brain+patrick+holford&qid=1716986254&s=instant-video&sprefix=upgrade+your+brain+patrick+holford,instant-video,69&sr=1-1&linkCode=sl1&tag=foodfortheb01-21&linkId=8de770776f3cdc5a00b10bcd0467db98&language=en_GB&ref_=as_li_ss_tl 00:00 - Introduction of Patrick Holford 01:30 - Discussion on dementia, its prevalence, and fear associated with it 03:30 - Dementia and nutrition: Introduction to the concept 04:50 - Alzheimer’s disease and its preventability 05:50 - Four biological drivers of brain breakdown: sugar, brain fats, B vitamins, antioxidants 08:50 - The role of fish consumption and omega-3 fatty acids 13:00 - Omega-3 index and its significance for brain health 16:50 - Case study of a man with mixed dementia improving through dietary changes 20:20 - Importance of specific types of fish and omega-3 sources 23:10 - Algae-based DHA supplements for vegetarians and vegans 26:50 - The role of B vitamins and methylation in brain health 35:50 - Combination of B vitamins and omega-3s to prevent brain shrinkage 40:00 - Impact of sugar and insulin resistance on brain health 49:30 - Importance of antioxidants in brain health 54:00 - The role of vitamin D in reducing dementia risk

NHS staff told to apologise for using ‘wrong’ pronouns https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/05/27/nhs-staff-ordered-apologise-using-wrong-pronouns/ Lewisham and Greenwich NHS Trust issued an 18-page diversity and inclusion policy forcing medics to accept patients’ personal pronouns. Should not confront patients using single-sex facilities regardless of their appearance. The trust’s trans policy, which came into effect in February last year according to the Daily Mail, said staff must say sorry to patients if they made mistakes relating to a patient’s pronouns. It also ordered them to make a “commitment to try harder” if they made mistakes about patients’ preferred pronouns. Victoria Atkins, Health Secretary “I am crystal clear: biological sex matters, and the language used by the NHS needs to recognise the different biological needs of men and women,” “Illnesses and conditions that we know impact men and women differently should be communicated in a clear and accurate way. “NHS staff must be allowed to get on with the job of caring for patients, not tiptoeing around trans guidance. “the Government’s proposed update to the NHS constitution makes clear what patients can expect from NHS services in meeting their needs, including the biological needs of the sexes.” Miriam Cates, MP and women’s rights campaigner “Lewisham and Greenwich NHS Trust seems to have gone through the looking glass into a world where biological sex doesn’t exist, and where the safety and dignity of vulnerable patients is ignored in the interests of being seen to adhere to a ridiculous ideology. “It is shocking that an organisation dedicated to evidence-based practice can be so blind to the reality of the differences between men and women.” Baroness Nicholson “This NHS trust seems to be deliberately ignoring the Health Secretary whose guidance declares that sex overrules gender in all medical matters,” “The NHS seems determined to follow its own unscientifically proven agenda; does this trust not recognise that male and female health profoundly differs? And that calling a man ‘her’ may so easily result in a nurse handing out the wrong medicines for the patient’s condition?” Cancer incidence for common cancers Breast cancer is the most common cancer in the UK, accounting for 3 in 20 (15%) of all cases in females and males combined The next most common cancers in UK people are prostate (14%), lung (13%), bowel (11%) Though there are more than 200 types of cancer, just these four types - breast, prostate, lung and bowel – together account for more than half (53%) of all new cases in the UK The two most common cancer types occur mainly or exclusively in only one sex. Breast https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/about-cancer/breast-cancer/about Breast cancer is more common in women than men. Around 55,500 women and around 370 men are diagnosed in the UK each year. 1 in 7 women in the UK develop breast cancer during their lifetime. It is more common in older women. Breast cancer is the most common cancer in the UK. Around 55,900 people are diagnosed with breast cancer every year in the UK. That is more than 150 people a day. 15 out of 100 (15%) newly diagnosed cancers in the UK are breast cancer. Prostate The prostate gland is part of the male reproductive system. You need a prostate gland to get prostate cancer. https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/about-cancer/prostate-cancer/about Around 52,300 men are diagnosed with prostate cancer in the UK each year. In men, it is the most common cancer in the UK. https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/about-cancer/ovarian-cancer/what-is-ovarian-cancer Ovarian There are 2 ovaries, one on each side of the body. The ovaries produce an egg each month in women of childbearing age. Around 7,500 women are diagnosed with ovarian cancer in the UK each year. This makes ovarian cancer the 6th most common cancer in women. Causes of death https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/healthandsocialcare/causesofdeath/articles/leadingcausesofdeathuk/2001to2018 The leading cause of death in the UK in 2018 was dementia and Alzheimer disease, accounting for 12.7% of all deaths registered. In 2008, the leading cause of death for females aged 50 to 64 years changed from malignant neoplasm of breast to malignant neoplasm of trachea, bronchus and lung, which accounted for 10.1% of deaths for this age group in 2018. From 2001 to 2018, suicide and injury or poisoning of undetermined intent was the leading cause of death for both males and females aged 20 to 34 years in the UK, for all years observed, accounting for 27.1% of male deaths and 16.7% of female deaths for this age group.

Chief Executive of Down's Syndrome Scotland EddieMcConell- https://www.covid19inquiry.scot/sites/default/files/ev-documents/sci-wt0450-000001.pdf 123. Our experience is that there is still what we call 'diagnostic overshadowing'. What we see is, when somebody presents at a GP practice or at a hospital with Down's syndrome, we commonly see them focus on the Down's syndrome and the presenting health issues are almost nullified because they say, "Well that is part of the Down's syndrome". However, it is a health issue that needs to be addressed but they cannot see past the Down's syndrome. That was certainly heightened during the pandemic. 124. We are quite strong about this and want to make our feelings clear. That is a form of discrimination, and we will call it out as discrimination. I think it is fair to say that the frailty scale issue and that access to equal healthcare existed before the pandemic, it was just escalated in the pandemic. 125. We had an incident not long after the pandemic where a gentleman went for a heart appointment, a cardiac appointment, and the specialist in the treatment room turned round to the young man's mother, the man was in his 20s, and she said, "I do not know whether it's worth operating on somebody like him". Those were the words that came out and that was the mindset, that his life is less worthy because he's got Down's syndrome to undergo heart treatment. Woman with Down’s syndrome loses court of appeal abortion law case https://www.theguardian.com/society/2022/nov/25/heidi-crowter-woman-downs-syndrome-loses-court-of-appeal-abortion-law-case Heidi Crowter argued that the law was discriminatory and stigmatised disabled people Heidi Crowter, who brought the case alongside Máire Lea-Wilson, whose son Aidan also has Down’s syndrome, had argued that allowing pregnancy terminations up to birth if the foetus has the condition is discriminatory and stigmatises disabled people. But in a ruling on Friday, three senior judges dismissed the appeal and said abortion laws were for parliament to decide. Heidi Crowter “absolutely distraught” by the ruling, and the existing law made her feel that people like her should be “extinct”. I am very upset that babies with Down’s syndrome can be aborted up to birth. This tells me that I am not valued and of much less value than a person without Down’s syndrome. I am angry that the judges say that my feelings don’t matter. That makes me feel that I am not as valuable as a person without Down’s syndrome. Heidi outside court https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sjc1RgzezVQ https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/publications/statistical/ncardrs-congenital-anomaly-statistics-annual-data/ncardrs-congenital-anomaly-statistics-report-2020/prevalence-t21-t18-t13 Down’s syndrome (Trisomy 21), Edwards syndrome (Trisomy 18) and Patau syndrome (Trisomy 13) Use free download link- https://ufile.io/xp4acnuj

Dr Tina Peers is a physician with a special interest in menopause, an inflammatory condition called mast cell activation syndrome (MCAS) and chronic fatigue. In this video Dr. Peers presents information that indicates MCAS is much more common than most doctors believe. She has developed treatment strategies that have transformed many lives for the better. Dr. Peers has also recently been treating people after covid vaccine injury. Consensus 1 and 2 discussion: Dr Afrin and Dr Dempsey. https://drtaniadempsey.com/dr-lawrence-afrin-on-mcas-diagnostic-criteria-consensus-2/ Dr Lawrence Afrin explaining MCAS with Dr Mobeen Syed: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cX6uZKInI7c&t=669s

Confirmed horrifying scandal https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/05/20/infected-blood-scandal-inquiry-live-latest/ Rishi Sunak “a day of shame for the British state” Worst treatment sandal in HNS history “Today’s report shows a decades-long moral failure at the heart of our national life – from the National Health Service to the Civil Service, to ministers in successive governments, at every level the people and institutions in which we place our trust failed in the most harrowing and devastating way. “They failed the victims and their families and they failed this country.” “moral failure at the heart of our national life” in which doctors, civil servants and ministers had put reputations above patient safety. “On behalf of this and every government stretching back to the 1970s, I am truly sorry.” The final report concluded Health service and governments took part in a “chilling” cover-up, as they “closed ranks” to hide the truth, even destroying documents to keep patients in the dark. Sir Brian Langstaff the “horrifying” scandal could and should have been avoided, but a “catalogue of failures” led to “calamity”. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/05/20/nhs-cover-up-avoidable-disaster-infected-blood-inquiry/ “It will be astonishing to anyone who reads this report that these events could have happened in the UK …that a level of suffering which it is difficult to comprehend, still less understand, has been caused to so many”. victims of the scandal “have been forced into a decades-long battle for the truth “Successive governments claimed that patients had received the best medical treatment available at the time, and that blood screening had been introduced at the earliest opportunity. Both claims were untrue. “Standing back, and viewing the response of the NHS and of government overall, the answer to the question ‘was there a cover-up?’ is that there has been. “Not in the sense of a handful of people plotting in an orchestrated conspiracy to mislead, but in a way that was more subtle, more pervasive and more chilling in its implications. “In this way there has been a hiding of much of the truth.” tragedy “was not an accident”. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/05/20/infected-blood-inquiry-report-key-findings/

Unnecessary deaths are a tragedy in themselves, but also distorted the covid fatality data. Use free download link- https://ufile.io/xp4acnuj Dave, independent researcher on Substack, https://biologyphenom.substack.com https://twitter.com/biologyphenom Witness statements: Lianne Menzies- https://www.covid19inquiry.scot/sites/default/files/ev-documents/sci-wt0068-000001.pdf DNACPR (DNR) 44. They asked Jamie five times to sign a DNR, a do not resuscitate document and he kept telling them no. The following day (28th March) they asked him again and it was five times in total that they asked him to sign a DNR. There were two other occasions and he repeatedly said they would need to speak to me. 46. Jamie got upset enough about this that he called me; he wanted me to reassure him that I wouldn't agree to it. He was terrified. He never signed one and there were never any conversations about DNR before. They eventually tested him for Covid. Jamie was initially told that the result was negative but then the doctor came round to see him later that day and said he had tested positive. He said the doctor thought he was over the worst of it. My friend works in the hospital, and she said that there had been e-mails and a leaflet sent out to say who would and wouldn't get treatment so I knew Jamie wouldn't get it. 53. On 4th April Jamie facetimed me; he looked really well. He was up and dressed. Jamie's oxygen must have been reduced because I had no trouble hearing him. He was laughing and joking away. I thought he must have been getting better and I would get him home soon. I asked if he was getting out and he said he would ask the doctor. Bereavement. 57. She asked if I understood that Jamie was going to die. I said absolutely not as he was sitting up in bed joking yesterday. 60. They gave Jamie midazolam to help him sleep. I went home but asked them to phone me and I would come straight back as I didn't want him to be alone. 61. I got a call the next morning (8th April 2020) to ask me to go back to the hospital. They said, 'it was time.' When I arrived, there were five nurses in the room with him in case I didn't arrive in time. 62. Jamie was in and out of consciousness most of that day; he was scared because he was having trouble breathing. He kept grabbing onto the bed rails frantically and shouting to me as he struggled to breath. The palliative care team came in and asked if I would like them to give him something to make him more comfortable; I agreed. They rotated the midazolam with morphine. 63. Jamie passed away at 11.29pm that night. Before Jamie passed away, we got married. He had been asking me and up until he became really ill, I had always said no not until you are better. I thought it was the last thing I could have done for him. He knew what was going on, a nurse took a video, and they got rings from the lost and found. 64. My mum got the chaplain, and we were able to get married in the hospital.

Unnecessary deaths are a tragedy in themselves, but also distorted the covid fatality data. Use free download link- https://ufile.io/xp4acnuj Dave, independent researcher https://twitter.com/biologyphenom Witness statements: Gilliant Grant- https://www.covid19inquiry.scot/sites/default/files/ev-documents/sci-wt0142-000002.pdf I was provided with a document at a meeting I had with one of the solicitors. The document was the DNR but this had my name written on it. I was shocked as this was the first time I had seen this document and did not even know it existed. I had never had any sight of this document before meeting with the solicitor. Initially it was thought a DNR document had been signed by my mum. This is incorrect. There is no signed DNR by my mum. The DNR had my name on it. I had never given permission for the DNR and I am very shocked and upset that this has my name on it. I do not understand it. The DNR is incomplete. The first part of the DNR asked if the patient authorises the DNR. This part had been left blank. The next part asks if the welfare attorney/ guardian authorises this and has my name written next to it but it is not dated. The part below that is signed by the GP and is dated for 2 November 2020. On this date my gran was showing only very mild signs of COVID symptoms. My gran suffered from mild dementia but had enough capacity to make her own decisions. I was asked about a DNR but categorically stated that I was not prepared to make any decision on a DNR if she was not critically ill and I knew she could make these decisions for herself. I was very clear and strongly worded on this with the care home. I think this conversation happened on the 2 of November 2020 and this is the date of the DNR. I think this is very important to include because I am shocked that this document exists as I had no knowledge of this before being presented with it and I had never authorised a DNR but this has my name on it. I would be happy for the inquiry to be provided with a copy of the DNR. It was also stated on these records that we did not wish her to go to hospital and this was also untrue. I stated on several occasions that if she deteriorated I wanted her to go to hospital immediately.

Direct links to Marc’s book and substack Amazon.com (USA) https://www.amazon.com/NEEDLES-SECRET-UNRAVELING-MYSTERY-REVOLUTION/dp/B0CYLSCMHN/ref=cm_cr_arp_d_product_top?ie=UTF8 UK Amazon https://www.amazon.co.uk/NEEDLES-SECRET-UNRAVELING-MYSTERY-REVOLUTION/dp/B0CYLSCMHN/ref=cm_cr_arp_d_product_top?ie=UTF8 Australia Amazon https://www.amazon.com.au/NEEDLES-SECRET-UNRAVELING-MYSTERY-REVOLUTION/dp/B0CYLSCMHN/ref=cm_cr_arp_d_product_top?ie=UTF8 The Bolus Theory Series on Substack https://covidmythbuster.substack.com My Bolus Theory website https://marcgirardot.com

Scottish COVID-19 Inquiry https://www.covid19inquiry.scot Direct link to all inquiry hearings https://www.covid19inquiry.scot/hearings Link to Dave, independent researcher https://twitter.com/biologyphenom Day 15 of the inquiry Direct link to this witness statement https://www.covid19inquiry.scot/sites/default/files/ev-documents/sci-wt0142-000002.pdf 54. The care home thought that they should give her a mild sedative to stop her getting up and down so much and help her sleep through the night and keep the cannula in. My mum agreed to that but if she had known what the sedative was she would have said no as she was a retired nurse and, they (care home) should not have asked her anyway as she was not authorised to approve this. 55. At this point my grandmother was eating and drinking by herself, moving to the toilet herself, that there was only mild symptoms and that they were giving her the nasal oxygen just as a precaution as her stats were a little low but, with the cannula in, she was fine. Her stats had actually improved 65 I was provided with a document at a meeting I had with one of the solicitors. The document was the DNR but this had my name written on it. I was shocked as this was the first time I had seen this document and did not even know it existed. Also from day 15 Direct link to this witness statement https://www.covid19inquiry.scot/sites/default/files/ev-documents/sci-wt0069-000001.pdf Day 21 of the inquiry Day 30 of the inquiry Direct link to transcript for day 30 https://www.covid19inquiry.scot/sites/default/files/ev-documents/sci-trnspt-000029.pdf

Brianne Dressen, first US lawsuit against AstraZeneca Covid Vaccine Injury Global Study: www.react19.org/study Covid vaccine injury medical expense fund: www.react19.org/donate AstraZeneca Lawsuit Full Complaint: https://aboutblaw.com/bd0D https://news.bloomberglaw.com/health-law-and-business/astrazeneca-sued-over-covid-19-vaccine-clinical-trial-injury Vaccine trial patient files first US lawsuit against AstraZeneca https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2024/05/13/vaccine-trial-patient-files-us-lawsuit-against-astrazeneca/ https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-13416585/utah-teacher-astrazeneca-lawsuit-covid-vaccine-disabled.html https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/other/utah-mom-sues-astrazeneca-claiming-she-was-left-permanently-disabled-in-covid-vaccine-trial/ar-BB1mmASM https://news.bloomberglaw.com/health-law-and-business/astrazeneca-sued-over-covid-19-vaccine-clinical-trial-injury Phase 3 Safety and Efficacy of AZD1222 (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19) Covid-19 Vaccine https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2105290 https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)32623-4/fulltext

Fatal Post COVID mRNA-Vaccine Associated Cerebral Ischemia https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37064937/ Keywords: COVID-19; Moderna vaccine; cerebral edema; neurology; stroke. McMillan N, Rosenberg HJ, Anderson MP, Pal P, Stephenson K, Fehnel CR. Fatal Post COVID mRNA-Vaccine Associated Cerebral Ischemia. Neurohospitalist. 2023 Apr;13(2):156-158. doi: 10.1177/19418744221136898. Epub 2022 Dec 5. PMID: 37064937; PMCID: PMC10091442. Department of Neurology, Harvard Medical School, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA. Background Venous thromboses have been linked to several COVID-19 vaccines Here we describe a case of post-Moderna COVID-19 vaccination arterial infarct, with vaccine-associated diffuse cortical edema, that was complicated by refractory intracranial hypertension. Case summary 24 hrs after receiving her first dose of the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine, a 30-year-old female developed severe headache. Three weeks later she was admitted with subacute headache and confusion. Imaging initially showed scattered cortical thrombosis with an elevated opening pressure on lumbar puncture. An external ventricular drain was placed, but she continued to have elevated intracranial pressure. Ultimately, she required a hemicraniectomy, but intractable cerebral edema resulted in her death. Pathology was consistent with thrombosis and associated inflammatory response. Conclusion Though correlational, her medical team surmised that the mRNA vaccine may have contributed to this presentation. The side effects of COVID-19 infection and vaccination are still incompletely understood. Though complications are rare, clinicians should be aware of presentations like this one. More information Had prior asymptomatic COVID-19 infection three months earlier 24-hours after first dose of the mRNA COVID-19 vaccine (Moderna). Developed severe, atypical throbbing bi-frontal headache Headaches were atypical (no prior headaches) Three weeks after vaccination Developed blurred vision and confusion Bifrontal headache with photophobia Lumbar puncture revealed lymphocytosis Broad spectrum antimicrobial coverage was started. Her mental status acutely worsened later that evening New left hemiparesis. Elevated D-dimer CSF cultures and PCR testing returned negative Intracranial pressure remained refractory to maximal medical management, including deep sedation, paralysis and hypothermia, prompting a right decompressive hemicraniectomy. The patient expired from refractory cerebral edema. Brain autopsy showed infiltrates of CD8 and CD4-positive T-cells, in association with intravascular thrombi Fungal and bacterial stains were negative. Discussion Diffuse endothelial damage and vessel wall inflammation, suggested an underlying pro-thrombotic state and T cell inflammatory response. The arterial infarct in this case is likely related to a pro-thrombotic state Due to the large volume of infarction, the patient was not started on anticoagulation after extensive discussion of the risks vs potential benefit. In summary, administration of COVID-19 vaccine was considered a possible cause of the extensive multifocal arterial thromboses with associated inflammatory response and elevated intracranial pressure given the temporal association. The mechanism for initial elevation in intracranial pressure is not known but may relate to cerebral autoregulatory changes in the setting of cortical microvascular thrombosis. https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/fatal-post-covid-19-mrna-vaccine?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=1119676&post_id=144566381&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=false&r=1f3dql&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email Suspected Unexpected Serious Adverse Reaction (SUSAR) such as this would have put a pause on the entire study and an investigation into why this happened and a call for risk mitigation measures to prevent the same complication from happening to more subjects.

Tickets for event 2 June in Glasgow https://tickets-scotland.com/brin X Twitter link for Alex, https://twitter.com/ake2306 Bring on the noise podcasts on Spotify https://spotify.link/SA55n9tjuJb Twitter - https://x.com/BringTheNoise_X?t=k1-QbSa16D4GbTcMFr6pug&s=09 Instagram - https://www.instagram.com/bring_the_noise_podcast?igsh=NWtnMXE4dWI1NnIx

Thousands (or is it millions) believe covid vaccines harmed them https://www.nytimes.com/2024/05/03/health/covid-vaccines-side-effects.html May 3, 2024 Case study, 37 year old woman Fit and well Within minutes of getting the Johnson & Johnson Covid-19 vaccine, felt pain racing from her left arm up to her ear and down to her fingertips. Within days, she was unbearably sensitive to light and struggled to remember simple facts. Now, + 3 years Diagnosed with brain damage, cannot work, drive or stand for long periods of time. ‘devastation of what this has done to my life, and how much I’ve lost’ As of April 2024, over 13,000 vaccine-injury compensation claims filed with the federal government 19% have been reviewed 47% deemed eligible for compensation https://www.hrsa.gov/cicp/cicp-data 12 claims paid out, average of $3,600 Akiko Iwasaki, immunologist, vaccine expert, Yale University people who say they have post-vaccination injuries are “just completely ignored and dismissed and gaslighted,” Dr. Janet Woodcock, retired, FDA some recipients, uncommon but “serious” and “life-changing” reactions beyond those described by federal agencies. “I feel bad for those people,” “I believe their suffering should be acknowledged, that they have real problems, and they should be taken seriously.” “I’m disappointed in myself,” “I did a lot of things I feel very good about, but this is one of the few things I feel I just didn’t bring it home.” Article then comments on disparate US health care systems No central repository of vaccine recipients Government’s compensation fund, officially recognizes few side effects for Covid vaccines. And vaccine supporters, including federal officials, worry that even a whisper of possible side effects feeds into misinformation spread by a vitriolic anti-vaccine movement. Patients who believe they experienced serious side effects say they have received little support or acknowledgment. SB, 54, nurse practitioner, (man) New York City ever since his first Covid shot, merely standing up sent his heart racing, postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome stinging pain in his eyes, mouth and genitals, which has abated, and tinnitus, which has not. AF “I can’t get the government to help me,” “I am told I’m not real. I’m told I’m rare. I’m told I’m coincidence.” RF, 49, physical therapist, (woman) Seattle Bell's palsy dramatic facial rash shingles RF reported it to federal databases twice. “I thought for sure someone would reach out, but no one ever did,” Interviews with 30 people Neurological, autoimmune, cardiovascular. All said they had been turned away by physicians, told their symptoms were psychosomatic, or labeled anti-vaccine by family and friends BC, doctor, (man) tinnitus and racing heart lasted about a week after each shot. GP, doctor, (man) loud whooshing sound in his ears had accompanied every moment since his first shot, entreaties to colleagues at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to explore the phenomenon, tinnitus, had led nowhere. “If they have done studies, those studies should be published,” CDC recognises Agency has documented only four serious but rare side effects Johnson & Johnson vaccine, Guillain Barre, blood clotting disorder mRNA vaccines, heart inflammation, or myocarditis Anaphylaxis Dr. Demetre Daskalakis, director, C.D.C.’s National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases. agency’s systems for monitoring vaccine safety are “pretty close” to ideal, he said. The C.D.C. has said there were no confirmed deaths related to myocarditis, but in fact there have been several accounts of deaths reported post-vaccination.

Update from Mr. Kyle Warner Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program (CICP) https://www.hrsa.gov/cicp/cicp-data CICP Claims Compensated https://www.hrsa.gov/cicp/cicp-data/table-4 See More from Kyle Warner @ KyleWarnerMTB - Instagram @Kyle&April-RideMTB - Youtube Website- Ridemtb.com Backlogged: Few cases finished after millions spent investigating COVID vaccine claims https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.investigatetv.com%2F2024%2F04%2F29%2Fbacklogged-few-cases-finished-after-millions-spent-investigating-covid-vaccine-claims%2F&data=05%7C02%7Ckyle.warner%40react19.org%7C69b08b89172e462aa6ff08dc689b595