Statins did not reduce the frequency of exacerbations in individuals with COPD and cardiovascular comorbidities in the COSYCONET cohort | Respiratory Research | Full Text
Skip to main content
Download PDF

Statins did not reduce the frequency of exacerbations in individuals with COPD and cardiovascular comorbidities in the COSYCONET cohort

Respiratory Research volume 25, Article number: 207 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The evidence regarding effects of statins on exacerbation risk in COPD remains controversial. Previous studies often excluded patients with cardiovascular comorbidities despite their high prevalence in COPD and role for exacerbations. Based on the cardioprotective properties of statins, we hypothesised that statins may reduce the risk of exacerbations especially in patients with cardiovascular comorbidities.

Methods

One thousand eight hundred eighty seven patients of the German COPD cohort COSYCONET (COPD and Systemic Consequences Comorbidities Network) of GOLD grades 1–4 (37.8% female, mean age 64.78 ± 8.3) were examined at baseline and over a period of 4.5 years for the occurrence of at least one exacerbation or severe exacerbation per year in cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses adjusted for age, gender, BMI, GOLD grade and pack-years. Due to their collinearity, various cardiovascular diseases were tested in separate analyses, whereby the potential effect of statins in the presence of a specific comorbidity was tested as interaction between statins and comorbidity. We also identified patients who never took statins, always took statins, or initiated statin intake during the follow-up.

Results

One thousand three hundred six patients never took statins, 31.6% were statin user, and 12.9% initiated statins during the follow-up. Most cardiovascular diseases were significantly (p < 0.05)may associated with an increased risk of COPD exacerbations, but in none of them the intake of statins was a significant attenuating factor, neither overall nor in modulating the increased risk linked to the specific comorbidities. The results of the cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses were consistent with each other, also those regarding at least 1 exacerbation or at least 1 severe exacerbation per year.

Conclusion

These findings complement the existing literature and may suggest that even in patients with COPD, cardiovascular comorbidities and a statin therapy that targets these comorbidities, the effects of statins on exacerbation risk are either negligible or more subtle than a reduction in exacerbation frequency.

Trial registration

Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, Identifier: NCT01245933.

Other Study ID (BMBF grant): 01GI0881, registered 18 November 2010, study start 2010–11, primary completion 2013–12, study completion 2023–09.

https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01245933?cond=COPD&term=COSYCONET&rank=3

Introduction

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a heterogeneous disease with chronic airway inflammation and multi-organ involvement caused by the interplay of inhaled pollutants, genetic predisposition and socioeconomic factors [1]. Exacerbations are known to be associated with disease progression and mortality [2], thus a major treatment goal is the reduction of the frequency of exacerbations, including the possibility of drug repurposing. In the past, statins (HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors), commonly used in patients with increased cardiovascular risk, have been considered regarding this effect [3]. The reason for this is that, in addition to its specific lipid-lowering effects, this class of drugs also has pleiotropic effects, including anti-inflammatory effects, improving endothelial function, increasing the stability of atherosclerotic plaques and reducing oxidative stress [4]. Even in a population without marked hyperlipidemia (total cholesterol level < 200 mg/dL), statin intake resulted in the reduction of cardiovascular disease events [5]. Several cardiovascular conditions, such as heart failure, ischemic heart disease and atrial fibrillation, are associated with an increased risk of exacerbations and mortality in COPD [6,7,8,9], while statins are known to have positive effects on cardiovascular disease [5]. Thus, the hypothesis of an effect of statins on COPD exacerbations is well founded.

Consequently, several prospective placebo-controlled studies and cohort studies have examined the potential effect of statins on the exacerbation rate in individuals with COPD, the results, however, were equivocal [10,11,12,13]. In patients with high risk for exacerbations, for example, a prospective randomised placebo-controlled trial found no effect of 40 mg simvastatin daily on exacerbation rate or time to exacerbation [11]; however, patients taking or requiring statins due to their cardiovascular risk profile were excluded. In contrast, another study reported that simvastatin significantly prolonged the time to first COPD exacerbation and reduced the exacerbation rate [13]. Based on such findings, it was stated [14] that at present there was no evidence of a positive effect of statins on exacerbations rate and mortality but that further studies were needed.

Due to the considerations mentioned above, it seems a reasonable hypothesis that the effect of statins on exacerbation risk in COPD might only occur in the presence of cardiovascular comorbidities or cardiovascular risk factors that are targeted by this medication, and that this dependence might explain the heterogeneous data. To address this, the comprehensive set of data from patients with stable COPD of the COSYCONET (COPD and Systemic Consequences–Comorbidities Network) cohort was used.

Methods

Study population

The longitudinal, observational cohort COSYCONET addresses the association between chronic lung disease and comorbidities [15]. Between 2010 and 2013, 2741 individuals with stable COPD were recruited. Major inclusion criteria were age ≥ 40 years and a physician-based diagnosis of COPD; further details can be found elsewhere [15]. Assessments took part 6, 18, 36, and 54 months (Visits 2–5) after the baseline visit (Visit 1). Approval by the local ethical committees of each study center was achieved, and all patients gave their written informed consent. The study was performed according to the declaration of Helsinki, and the identifier on Clinical-Trials.gov is NCT01245933.

Functional and clinical assessments

Details of clinical and functional assessments in COSYCONET have been described previously [15]. The measured variables included age, body mass index (BMI), smoking status, packyears, forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) and forced vital capacity (FVC) determined according to ATS/ERS recommendations [16], diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (TLCO), 6-min walk distance (6-MWD) [17], the St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) [18], the number of exacerbations and of severe exacerbations in the previous year; from these variables the BODE index was computed [19]. Predicted values for lung function were taken from GLI [20, 21]. In addition, the ankle-brachial (ABI) was assessed [15] and categorised according to values ≤ 0.90. Routine laboratory parameters included C-reactive protein (CRP), HbA1c [15], total cholesterol, triglycerides, and HDL- and LDL-cholesterol.

Patient-reported, physician-diagnosed comorbidities comprised diabetes, history of stroke, cardiovascular disorders including heart failure, coronary artery disease and history of myocardial infarction. All patients were categorised into GOLD groups A/B/E based on their symptoms assessed via the mMRC [22] and their exacerbation history following the criteria proposed by GOLD [2]. The documentation of the exacerbation history occurred at each visit based on the definition of acute worsening of a lung disease, such as increased shortness of breath, increased or purulent sputum. The definition of exacerbations was according to GOLD: Acute respiratory deterioration over several days and the need for specific measures (mild exacerbation: handled by the patient itself, moderate exacerbation: visit to the primary care physician, severe exacerbation: resulted in a hospital admission) [23]. Patients were asked to bring all of their medication to each study visit, which was then categorised according to ATC codes as described previously [24].

Definition of groups and outcome

We included only patients with a ratio FEV1/FVC < 0.7 who could be categorised into GOLD grades 1–4 according to FEV1 [2]. The follow-up included visits 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5, covering a period of 4.5 years (Fig. 1). For analysis, we defined the three groups of patients who were either taking statins already at baseline (statin users, SU) or statin-naïve (SN) or initiated the intake of statins during follow-up (incident-statins, IS). The endpoint of the study was the occurrence of at least one exacerbation or at least one severe exacerbation in the last year, based on the clinical history documented at each visit.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flow chart showing the selection process of patients for analysis

Full size image

Statistical analysis

We present categorical data as absolute counts and percentages, and continuous data as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Three types of comparison were performed. First, baseline data were compared between groups SN and SU, as well as SN and IS, using unpaired t-tests for metric variables and chi-square statistics for categorical variables. Second, we utilised logistic regression models to assess the impact of comorbidities and statins on the occurrence of at least one exacerbation per year in the baseline data, while adjusting for age, sex, BMI, GOLD grade and pack-years. Third, we employed mixed models (Generalised Estimating Equations GEE, binomial distribution, logit link) for the longitudinal analysis of statin prescription and its effect on exacerbations over visits V1 to V5 equivalent to 4.5 years of follow-up, again adjusting for age, sex, BMI, GOLD grade and pack-years; the outcomes were either the occurrence of at least one exacerbation or of at least one severe exacerbation per year. All analyses were performed separately including different cardiovascular comorbidities as predictor, due to their significant correlation with each other. Thus, besides age, sex, BMI, GOLD grade and pack-years the predictors, the logistic and the longitudinal analyses included the presence of the specific comorbidity, that of statins and an interaction term between these two factors. All patients with all their visits were kept in the longitudinal analyses but additionally a sensitivity analysis was performed including only those patients that remained in the study until visit 5. A two-sided p-value < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant. For data analysis, the software package SPSS (Version: 29.0.0.0., IBM, Armonk, NJ, USA) was used.

Results

Baseline characteristics

Figure 1 illustrates the inclusion and follow-up criteria of the patients. 450 patients were excluded. Patients with FEV1/FVC ≥ 0.7 (n = 430) dropped out. 20 patients had no available information on their GOLD class. 234 patients were not considered due to missing information on their pack-years. 127 patients were excluded due to missing information on LDL cholesterol. The remaining exclusions were attributed to missing information in various parameters: BMI: 2 patients, Exacerbations: 3 patients, FEV1: 16 patients, TLCO: 160 patients, CRP: 41 patients, HbA1c: 71 patients. Out of the 413 patients in the SU group, 154 (37.3%) completed visit 5. Similarly, among the 1306 patients in the SN group, 476 (36.4%) completed visit 5. Table 1 shows the baseline characteristics of the three groups.

Table 1 Baseline characteristics
Full size table

Statin users (SU) versus statin-naïve (SN)

There were significant differences between the two groups. More men (74.6% vs. 57.8%) and more patients with diabetes (25.4 vs. 9.1%) and stroke (8.7 vs. 3.0%) took statins from the beginning until visit 5, compared to the individuals who were statin-naïve. Furthermore, subjects in the SU group were older (67.5 ± 7.3 vs. 63.8 ± 8.6 years), had higher BMI (27.5 ± 5.0 vs. 26.4 ± 5.4 kg/m2), and exhibited significantly lower LDL cholesterol levels (2.73 ± 1.01 vs. 3.39 ± 0.97), lower HDL cholesterol levels (1.61 ± 0.6 vs. 1.78 ± 0.6), lower total cholesterol levels (4.87 ± 1.21 vs. 5.67 ± 1.14), higher triglyceride levels (1.70 ± 1.11 vs. 1.50 ± 0.96), and higher HbA1c levels (6.14 ± 0.83 vs. 5.84 ± 0.62). The two groups did not show significant differences with regard to FEV1% predicted, FVC % predicted, SQRQ, the distribution of GOLD grades, BODE index, and CRP levels.

Incident-statins (IS) versus statin-naïve (SN)

Compared to the SN group, statins were newly prescribed during the follow-up (IS) in older subjects (66.2 ± 7.0 vs. 63.8 ± 8.6) and individuals with more packyears of smoking (54.5 ± 40.3 vs. 47.2 ± 34.2). These subjects also had a better lung function in terms of FEV1% predicted (59.6 ± 18.3 vs. 52.2 ± 18.3) and higher FVC % predicted (84.6 ± 18.9 vs. 78.7 ± 18.7). At baseline, total cholesterol was lower (4.78 ± 1.16 vs. 5.67 ± 1.14), LDL cholesterol was lower (2.60 ± 1.0 vs. 3.39 ± 0.97), and HDL cholesterol was lower (1.67 ± 0.52 vs. 1.78 ± 0.60). BMI, prevalence of diabetes, history of stroke, SQRQ, BODE index, HbA1c and CRP did not significantly differ between the two groups.

Association between statin intake, comorbidities and exacerbation frequency

Overall, 7777 acute COPD exacerbations were registered during the 4.5-year follow-up. Table 2 displays the distribution of exacerbations across visits. In the unpaired t-test there were no significant differences in exacerbation rates per person year between the SU and the SN groups, with values of 1.2 ± 1.87 vs. 1.22 ± 1.87, respectively (p = 0.87).

Table 2 Number,mean of exacerbations and number of patients (in parentheses) at each study visit
Full size table

Cardiovascular diseases and exacerbation frequency at baseline

We investigated whether cardiovascular comorbidities were associated with an elevated risk of exacerbations, using baseline data and logistic regression models. All five cardiovascular entities that had been included were significantly associated with the exacerbation risk, with Odds Ratios as shown in Table 3 and illustrated in Fig. 2A. The presence of statins did not show any significant associations with exacerbations (Table 3, Fig. 2B), and the same was true for the interaction term between statins and comorbidity (Table 3), suggesting the absence of differential effects in patients with specific cardiovascular comorbidities.

Table 3 Association between the occurrence of at least 1 exacerbation per year and several cardiovascular comorbidities as well as statins in the baseline data
Full size table
Fig. 2
figure 2

A Forest plot displaying the adjusted odds ratios and their 95% confidence intervals for the association between each cardiovascular comorbidity (and a summary value for at least one disease and a summary value for the combination of two comorbidities) and the occurrence of at least one exacerbation per year at baseline. The numerical data can be found in Table 3 and were obtained by logistic regression analysis adjusted for sex, age, BMI, GOLD grade and pack-years. B Forest plot displaying the adjusted odds ratios and their 95% confidence intervals for the association between the medication with statins and the occurrence of at least one exacerbation per year at baseline for each of the cardiovascular comorbidities (and a summary value for at least one disease and a summary value for the combination of two comorbidities) shown in Fig. 2A. The numerical data can be found in Table 3 and were obtained by logistic regression analysis adjusted for sex, age, BMI, GOLD grade and pack-years

Full size image

Cardiovascular diseases and exacerbation frequency in the follow-up

In the longitudinal analysis over 4.5 years, the occurrence of at least one exacerbation per year, heart failure, cardiac arrhythmias, CAD and hypertension showed significant associations with the occurrence of exacerbations, while PAD did not (Table 4, Fig. 3A). Statins did not have significant effects in any of the cardiovascular conditions (Table 3, Fig. 3B), and the same applied to the interaction terms (Table 4).

Table 4 Association between the occurrence of at least 1 exacerbation per year and several cardiovascular comorbidities as well as statins in the follow-up data
Full size table
Fig. 3
figure 3

A Forest plot displaying the adjusted odds ratios and their 95% confidence intervals for the association between each cardiovascular comorbidity (and a summary value for at least one disease and a summary value for the combination of two comorbidities) and the occurrence of at least one exacerbation per year between the investigated cardiovascular diseases and exacerbation occurrence during the 4.5 years of follow up. The numerical data can be found in Table 4 and were obtained by a GEE analysis adjusted for sex, age, BMI, GOLD grade and pack-years. B Forest plot displaying the adjusted odds ratios and their 95% confidence intervals for the association between the medication with statins and the occurrence of at least one exacerbation per year at baseline for each of the cardiovascular comorbidities (and a summary value for at least one disease and a summary value for the combination of two comorbidities) shown in Fig. 3A during the 4.5 years of follow up. The numerical data can be found in Table 4 and were obtained by a GEE analysis adjusted for sex, age, BMI, GOLD grade and pack-years

Full size image

When repeating the analysis with the outcome of at least one severe exacerbation per year, qualitatively similar results were obtained as for exacerbations in general (Table 5, Figs. 4A and B), with the exception that hypertension was no more significantly associated with an increased exacerbation risk. It also became apparent that only the presence of at least 2 cardiovascular comorbidities was significantly associated with increased risk of severe exacerbation.

Table 5 Association between the occurrence of at least 1 severe exacerbation per year and several cardiovascular comorbidities as well as statins in the follow-up data
Full size table
Fig. 4
figure 4

A Forest plot displaying the adjusted odds ratios and their 95% confidence intervals for the association between each cardiovascular comorbidity and the occurrence of at least one severe exacerbation per year between the investigated cardiovascular diseases and exacerbation occurrence during the 4.5 years of follow up (and a summary value for at least one disease and a summary value for the combination of two comorbidities). The numerical data can be found in Table 5 and were obtained by a GEE analysis adjusted for sex, age, BMI, GOLD grade and pack-years. B Forest plot displaying the adjusted odds ratios and their 95% confidence intervals for the association between the medication with statins and the occurrence of at least one severe exacerbation per year at baseline for each of the cardiovascular comorbidities shown in Fig. 4A during the 4.5 years of follow up (and a summary value for at least one disease and a summary value for the combination of two comorbidities). The numerical data can be found in Table 5 and were obtained by an GEE analysis adjusted for sex, age, BMI, GOLD grade and pack-years

Full size image

In order to reveal whether the result critically depended on patients’ loss to follow-up, we performed a sensitivity analysis. For this purpose, the longitudinal analyses were repeated while including only those patients who participated until visit 5. The results of this sensitivity analysis for at least one exacerbation are given in the Supplemental Table S1 and those for at least one severe exacerbation in the Supplemental Table S2. It can be seen that only heart failure and cardiac arrhythmias were significantly related to the occurrence of at least one exacerbation or one severe exacerbation and that in case of severe exacerbations the presence of at least 2 comorbidities was required for a significant association. Statins still did not show significant associations.

Discussion

In this study, we examined potential effects of statins on exacerbation risk in patients with COPD, focusing on the potential role of cardiovascular comorbidities for such effects. Given the high prevalence of cardiovascular comorbidities in COPD and the fact that a number of previous studies did exclude patients with cardiovascular disease [11, 13], this seems of both scientific and clinical interest. The present study confirmed the results of previous cross-sectional analyses in the COSYCONET cohort that cardiovascular comorbidities were associated with an increased risk of exacerbations [25, 26]. In line with this, it also demonstrated in a longitudinal analysis over a 4.5-year period that the presence of heart failure, cardiac arrhythmias, coronary artery disease and hypertension was associated with exacerbation risk. Patients with COPD often show cardiovascular comorbidities that can be the cause of an acute deterioration independent of the lung disease [25, 26]. This association could be based on several factors, a fact that was covered by the rather general (until 2022) definition of exacerbations as “acute worsening of respiratory symptoms that results in additional therapy” which did not address specific causes [27]. Statins have their place in the prevention of cardiovascular diseases [28,29,30]. Thus, it appears reasonable to expect effects on COPD exacerbation risk in subjects with at least one cardiovascular comorbidity. Contrary to our hypothesis, however, there was no reduction in the risk of exacerbations including severe exacerbations. Even in patients with at least two cardiovascular comorbidities, statins did not have a significant effect in the longitudinal follow-up compared to patients not taking statins. This also applied to patients who got their first prescribed statins during the observation period of 4.5 years. We used cross-sectional and longitudinal statistical standard approaches including main factors and interaction terms, but neither the main factors of statin intake nor their interactions with cardiovascular comorbidities indicated an effect.

Our data are in line with those of the multi-centre placebo-controlled study by Criner et al., in which simvastatin at a daily dose of 40 mg had no effect on the rate of exacerbations and the time to the next exacerbation [11]. This study was performed in 885 patients with COPD treated from 12 to 36 months, who were at high risk for exacerbations but without cardiovascular diseases, diabetes and without requiring statins. These findings and our own findings are, however, not in line with those of the recently published prospective, randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study by Schenk et al. investigating the impact of simvastatin on exacerbation rate and time to next exacerbation [13]. It was found that 40 mg simvastatin daily prolonged the time to first exacerbation and reduced the exacerbation rate. As the authors excluded patients with cardiovascular diseases, this seems remarkable, if it is argued that effects were to be expected primarily in these patients. There are, however, differences in sample size and follow-up period that might be relevant. While in COSYCONET subjects were observed over a follow-up period of 4.5 years, the scope of the prospective randomised study was limited to 1 year. During this time, 66 subjects with placebo and 72 subjects on simvastatin completed the study. On the other hand, a clear strength was that Schenk et al. used diaries that enabled a precise recording and reporting of exacerbations.

Although the available data therefore remain conflicting, our study adds to the current knowledge as it particularly addressed the hypothesis that the effects of statins would be apparent in those patients with COPD who had cardiovascular diseases and thus a risk factor for exacerbations that was targeted by the statins. The observed lack of effect suggests that the effects of statins on acute cardiovascular events that are related to exacerbations were secondary, despite the well-known long-term protective effect of statins on the progression of cardiovascular disease. Nevertheless, in the future, a randomized controlled study would be beneficial which specifically examines the effect of statins on cardiovascular events and exacerbations in patients with COPD and cardiovascular diseases.

Limitations and strengths of the study

COSYCONET is not a placebo-controlled, randomised study, and its observational character naturally limits the scope of conclusions that can be drawn. Moreover, although the definition of exacerbations followed established criteria and practice, it certainly would have benefitted from a more precise recording, for example via an electronic diary. On the other hand, at least the occurrence of severe exacerbations can be assumed to have been recorded reliably. We also cannot provide data on the association between statin intake and the precise time to the next exacerbation (time to event). Moreover, we analysed statins as a drug class without distinguishing between different drugs of this class, whereas the randomised studies examined specific drugs, in particular simvastatin, and it cannot be excluded that effects differ between different statins. Furthermore, we did not have information about the duration of intake until inclusion in the cohort study, and the different dosages and types of preparations could not be taken into account. It should also be noted that we cannot exclude a healthy survivor bias due to loss to follow-up, although the comparison of all patients with those remaining in the study until the end of follow-up yielded consistent results. In the longitudinal analyses reported here, we included visit 2 data despite their overlap with visit 1 data, as sensitivity analyses omitting visit 2 data did not yield different results. Moreover, in the study population visits were performed throughout the year, thus potential inhomogeneity over time due to the fact that exacerbations were reported for the previous 12 months and study visits were mostly separated by 18 months, are unlikely. The strengths of our study are that we examined a large number of subjects over a long period of time and covered a whole range of cardiovascular comorbidities that allowed for a detailed analysis of potential effects of statins in specific cardiovascular conditions.

Conclusion

The present study addressed the hypothesis that in patients with COPD the presence of cardiovascular comorbidities might be a relevant factor determining the effect of statins on exacerbation risk. Using a large data set, we found in cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis that most cardiovascular comorbidities were associated with increased exacerbation risk but that statins were neither linked to an overall reduction of this risk nor to specific effects in patients with different cardiovascular comorbidities. These data complement the existing literature and may suggest that even in patients with a therapy that specifically targets such comorbidities, potential effects of statins are either negligible or more subtle than a reduction of exacerbation frequency. Additional research is required to expand upon this hypothesis in future studies.

Availability of data and materials

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

References

  1. Stolz D, Mkorombindo T, Schumann DM, Agusti A, Ash SY, Bafadhel M, et al. Towards the elimination of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a lancet commission. Lancet (London, England). 2022;400(10356):921–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Vogelmeier CF, Criner GJ, Martinez FJ, Anzueto A, Barnes PJ, Bourbeau J, et al. Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive lung disease 2017 report GOLD executive summary. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017;195(5):557–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Mannino DM, Thorn D, Swensen A, Holguin F. Prevalence and outcomes of diabetes, hypertension and cardiovascular disease in COPD. Eur Respir J. 2008;32(4):962–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Liao JK, Laufs U. Pleiotropic effects of statins. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2005;45:89–118.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Chou R, Dana T, Blazina I, Daeges M, Jeanne TL. Statins for prevention of cardiovascular disease in adults: evidence report and systematic review for the US preventive services task force. JAMA. 2016;316(19):2008–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Westerik JA, Metting EI, van Boven JF, Tiersma W, Kocks JW, Schermer TR. Associations between chronic comorbidity and exacerbation risk in primary care patients with COPD. Respir Res. 2017;18(1):31.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Divo M, Cote C, de Torres JP, Casanova C, Marin JM, Pinto-Plata V, et al. Comorbidities and risk of mortality in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012;186(2):155–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Miller J, Edwards LD, Agustí A, Bakke P, Calverley PM, Celli B, et al. Comorbidity, systemic inflammation and outcomes in the ECLIPSE cohort. Respir Med. 2013;107(9):1376–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lahousse L, Tiemeier H, Ikram MA, Brusselle GG. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and cerebrovascular disease: a comprehensive review. Respir Med. 2015;109(11):1371–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Obeidat M, Fishbane N, Nie Y, Chen V, Hollander Z, Tebbutt SJ, et al. The effect of statins on blood gene expression in COPD. Plos One. 2015;10(10): e0140022.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Criner GJ, Connett JE, Aaron SD, Albert RK, Bailey WC, Casaburi R, et al. Simvastatin for the prevention of exacerbations in moderate-to-severe COPD. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(23):2201–10.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Søyseth V, Brekke PH, Smith P, Omland T. Statin use is associated with reduced mortality in COPD. Eur Respir J. 2007;29(2):279–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Schenk P, Spiel AO, Hüttinger F, Gmeiner M, Fugger J, Pichler M, et al. Can simvastatin reduce COPD exacerbations? A randomised double-blind controlled study. Eur Respir J. 2021;58(1):2001798.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Walsh A, Perrem L, Khashan AS, Henry MT, Ni Chroinin M. Statins versus placebo for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Cochrane Database System Rev. 2019;7(7):Cd011959.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Karch A, Vogelmeier C, Welte T, Bals R, Kauczor HU, Biederer J, et al. The German COPD cohort COSYCONET: Aims, methods and descriptive analysis of the study population at baseline. Respir Med. 2016;114:27–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Brusasco V, Crapo R, Viegi G. Coming together: the ATS/ERS consensus on clinical pulmonary function testing. Eur Respir J. 2005;26(1):1–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Holland AE, Hill CJ, Rasekaba T, Lee A, Naughton MT, McDonald CF. Updating the minimal important difference for six-minute walk distance in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91(2):221–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Jones PW, Quirk FH, Baveystock CM, Littlejohns P. A self-complete measure of health status for chronic airflow limitation. The St. George’s respiratory questionnaire. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1992;145(6):1321–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Celli BR, Cote CG, Marin JM, Casanova C, de Oca Montes M, Mendez RA, et al. The body-mass index, airflow obstruction, dyspnea, and exercise capacity index in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. N Engl J Med. 2004;350(10):1005–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Quanjer PH, Stanojevic S, Cole TJ, Baur X, Hall GL, Culver BH, et al. Multi-ethnic reference values for spirometry for the 3–95-yr age range: the global lung function 2012 equations. Eur Respir J. 2012;40(6):1324–43.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Stanojevic S, Graham BL, Cooper BG, Thompson BR, Carter KW, Francis RW, et al. Official ERS technical standards: Global lung function initiative reference values for the carbon monoxide transfer factor for Caucasians. Eur Respir J. 2017;50(3):1700010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hajiro T, Nishimura K, Tsukino M, Ikeda A, Koyama H, Izumi T. Analysis of clinical methods used to evaluate dyspnea in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998;158(4):1185–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Byng D, Lutter JI, Wacker ME, Jörres RA, Liu X, Karrasch S, et al. Determinants of healthcare utilization and costs in COPD patients: first longitudinal results from the German COPD cohort COSYCONET. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2019;14:1423–39.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Lucke T, Herrera R, Wacker M, Holle R, Biertz F, Nowak D, et al. Systematic analysis of self-reported comorbidities in large cohort studies - a novel stepwise approach by evaluation of medication. Plos One. 2016;11(10): e0163408.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Alter P, Lucke T, Watz H, Andreas S, Kahnert K, Trudzinski FC, et al. Cardiovascular predictors of mortality and exacerbations in patients with COPD. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):21882.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Kahnert K, Alter P, Young D, Lucke T, Heinrich J, Huber RM, et al. The revised GOLD 2017 COPD categorization in relation to comorbidities. Respir Med. 2018;134:79–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. GOLD. GIfCOLDA. Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease. Available from: www.goldcopdorg 2022.

  28. Treasure CB, Klein JL, Weintraub WS, Talley JD, Stillabower ME, Kosinski AS, et al. Beneficial effects of cholesterol-lowering therapy on the coronary endothelium in patients with coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 1995;332(8):481–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Sacks FM, Pasternak RC, Gibson CM, Rosner B, Stone PH. Effect on coronary atherosclerosis of decrease in plasma cholesterol concentrations in normocholesterolaemic patients. Harvard Atherosclerosis Reversibility Project (HARP) Group. Lancet (London, England). 1994;344(8931):1182–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Collins R, Armitage J, Parish S, Sleight P, Peto R. Effects of cholesterol-lowering with simvastatin on stroke and other major vascular events in 20536 people with cerebrovascular disease or other high-risk conditions. Lancet (London, England). 2004;363(9411):757–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank all patients of COSYCONET for their kind cooperation and all study centers for their excellent work. We are grateful to the Scientific Advisory Board of COSYCONET for continuing support und helpful recommendations.

Funding

Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. COSYCONET is supported by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) Competence Network Asthma and COPD (ASCONET) and performed in collaboration with the German Center for Lung Research (DZL). The project is funded by the BMBF with grant number 01 GI 0881, and is supported by unrestricted grants from AstraZeneca GmbH, Bayer Schering Pharma AG, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG, Chiesi GmbH, GlaxoSmithKline, Grifols Deutschland GmbH, MSD Sharp & Dohme GmbH, Mundipharma GmbH, Novartis Deutschland GmbH, Pfizer Pharma GmbH, Takeda Pharma Vertrieb GmbH & Co. KG, Teva GmbH for patient investigations and laboratory measurements. For the present study, an additional grant for data management was given by Novartis Pharma GmbH. The funding body had no involvement in the design of the study, or the collection, analysis or interpretation of the data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Pneumology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany

    N. Frantzi, X. P. Nguyen, D. Soriano, D. Stolz & S. Fähndrich

  2. Department of Internal Medicine V - Pulmonology, Allergology, Critical Care Care Medicine, Saarland University Hospital, Homburg, Germany

    C. Herr, A. Omlor, F. Seiler & R. Bals

  3. Department of Medicine, Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Philipps University of Marburg (UMR), Marburg, Germany

    P. Alter, S. Söhler & C. F. Vogelmeier

  4. Airway Research Center North (ARCN), Pulmonary Research Institute at LungenClinic Grosshansdorf, Grosshansdorf, DZ, Germany

    H. Watz & B. Waschki

  5. LungenClinic Grosshansdorf, Airway Research Center North (ARCN), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Grosshansdorf, Germany

    H. Watz

  6. Hospital Itzehoe, Pneumology, Itzehoe, Germany

    B. Waschki

  7. Department of Cardiology, University Heart & Vascular Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany

    B. Waschki

  8. Department of Pneumology and Critical Care, Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRC-H), Thoraxklinik Heidelberg gGmbH, Heidelberg, Germany

    F. Trinkmann, F. C. Trudzinski & J. D. Michels-Zetsche

  9. Department of Cardiology and Angiology, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany

    M. Eichenlaub

  10. Department of Thoracic Surgery, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany

    I. Moneke

  11. Hannover Medical School, CAPNETZ STIFTUNG, Hannover, Germany

    F. Biertz

  12. Department of Respiratory Medicine, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Medical Clinic I, Frankfurt/Main, Germany

    G. Rohde

  13. Department of Respiratory Medicine, (BREATH), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Research in Endstage and Obstructive Lung Disease Hannover, Hannover, Germany

    T. Welte

  14. Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Member of the German Center of Lung Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany

    H. U. Kauczor

  15. Department of Internal Medicine V, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Comprehensive Pneumology Center, Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany

    K. Kahnert

  16. Institute and Outpatient Clinic for Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, Comprehensive Pneumology Center, Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), LMU University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany

    R. A. Jörres

  17. Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research (HZI), Helmholtz Institute for Pharmaceutical Research Saarland (HIPS), Saarland University Campus, Saarbrücken, Germany

    R. Bals

Authors
  1. N. Frantzi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. X. P. Nguyen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. C. Herr
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. P. Alter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. S. Söhler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. D. Soriano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. H. Watz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. B. Waschki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. F. Trinkmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. M. Eichenlaub
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. F. C. Trudzinski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. J. D. Michels-Zetsche
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. A. Omlor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. F. Seiler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. I. Moneke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. F. Biertz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  17. G. Rohde
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  18. D. Stolz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  19. T. Welte
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  20. H. U. Kauczor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  21. K. Kahnert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  22. R. A. Jörres
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  23. C. F. Vogelmeier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  24. R. Bals
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  25. S. Fähndrich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Consortia

on behalf of the German COSYCONET Cohort

  • Stefan Andreas
  • , P. Alter
  • , R. Bals
  • , Jürgen Behr
  • , K. Kahnert
  • , Thomas Bahmer
  • , Burkhard Bewig
  • , Ralf Ewert
  • , Beate Stubbe
  • , HJoachim Ficker
  • , Christian Grohé
  • , Matthias Held
  • , Markus Henke
  • , Felix Herth
  • , Anne-Marie Kirsten
  • , H. Watz
  • , Rembert Koczulla
  • , Juliane Kronsbein
  • , Cornelia Kropf-Sanchen
  • , Christian Herzmann
  • , Michael Pfeifer
  • , JWinfried Randerath
  • , Werner Seeger
  • , Michael Studnicka
  • , Christian Taube
  • , Hartmut Timmermann
  • , Bernd Schmeck
  • , C. F. Vogelmeier
  • , T. Welte
  •  & Hubert Wirtz

Contributions

N. Frantzi was involved in the conceptualization of the study, interpretation of the data, drafting and finalisation of the manuscript, approved the final submitted version, and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work. X. P. Nguyen was involved in the interpretation of the data, drafting and finalisation of the manuscript, approved the final submitted version, and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work. C. Herr was involved in the laboratory determination of the biomarkers and approved the final submitted version, and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work. P. Alter was involved in the interpretation of the data, drafting and finalisation of the manuscript, approved the final submitted version, and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work. S. Söhler was involved in the interpretation of the data, drafting and finalisation of the manuscript, approved the final submitted version, and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work. D. Soriano was involved in the interpretation of the data, drafting and finalisation of the manuscript, approved the final submitted version, and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work. H. Watz was involved in the interpretation of the data, drafting and finalisation of the manuscript, approved the final submitted version, and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work. B. Waschki was involved in the interpretation of the data, drafting and finalisation of the manuscript, approved the final submitted version, and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work. F Trinkmann was involved in the interpretation of the data, drafting and finalisation of the manuscript, approved the final submitted version, and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work. M. Eichenlaub was involved in the interpretation of the data, drafting and finalisation of the manuscript, approved the final submitted version, and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work. F.C. Trudzinski was involved in the interpretation of the data, drafting and finalisation of the manuscript, approved the final submitted version, and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work. J.D. Michels-Zetsche was involved in the interpretation of the data, drafting and finalisation of the manuscript, approved the final submitted version, and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work. A. Omlor was involved in the interpretation of the data, drafting and finalisation of the manuscript, approved the final submitted version, and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work. F. Seiler was involved in the interpretation of the data, drafting and finalisation of the manuscript, approved the final submitted version, and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work. I. Moneke was involved in the interpretation of the data, drafting and finalisation of the manuscript, approved the final submitted version, and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work. F. Biertz was involved in the data analysis, drafting and finalisation of the manuscript, approved the final submitted version, and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work. G. Rohde was involved in the data analysis, drafting and finalisation of the manuscript, approved the final submitted version, and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work. D. Stolz was involved in the interpretation of the data, drafting and finalisation of the manuscript, approved the final submitted version, and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work. T. Welte was involved in the interpretation of the data, drafting and finalisation of the manuscript, approved the final submitted version, and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work. H.U. Kauczor was involved in the interpretation of the data, drafting and finalisation of the manuscript, approved the final submitted version, and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work. K. Kahnert was involved in the interpretation of the data, drafting and finalisation of the manuscript, approved the final submitted version, and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work. R.A. Jörres was involved in the data analysis, interpretation of the data, drafting and finalisation of the manuscript, approved the final submitted version, and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work. C. Vogelmeier was involved in the interpretation of the data, drafting and finalisation of the manuscript, approved the final submitted version, and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work. R. Bals was involved in the conceptualization of the study, interpretation of the data, drafting and finalisation of the manuscript, approved the final submitted version, and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work. S. Fähndrich was involved in the conceptualization of the study, interpretation of the data, drafting and finalisation of the manuscript, approved the final submitted version, and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Fähndrich.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study protocol was approved by the central ethical committee in Marburg (Ethikkommission FB Medizin Marburg) and the respective local ethical committees: Bad Reichenhall (Ethikkommission Bayerische Landesärztekammer); Berlin (Ethikkommission Ärztekammer Berlin); Bochum (Ethikkommission Medizinische Fakultät der RUB); Borstel (Ethikkommission Universität Lübeck); Coswig (Ethikkommission TU Dresden); Donaustauf (Ethikkommission Universitätsklinikum Regensburg); Essen (Ethikkommission Medizinische Fakultät Duisburg-Essen); Gießen (Ethikkommission Fachbereich Medizin); Greifswald (Ethikkommission Universitätsmedizin Greifswald); Großhansdorf (Ethikkommission Ärztekammer Schleswig–Holstein); Hamburg (Ethikkommission Ärztekammer Hamburg); MHH Hannover/Coppenbrügge (MHH Ethikkommission); Heidelberg Thorax/Uniklinik (Ethikkommission Universität Heidelberg); Homburg (Ethikkommission Saarbrücken); Immenhausen (Ethikkommission Landesärztekammer Hessen); Kiel (Ethikkommission Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel); Leipzig (Ethikkommission Universität Leipzig); Löwenstein (Ethikkommission Landesärztekammer Baden-Württemberg); Mainz (Ethikkommission Landesärztekammer Rheinland-Pfalz); München LMU/Gauting (Ethikkommission Klinikum Universität München); Nürnberg (Ethikkommission Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen Nürnberg); Rostock (Ethikkommission Universität Rostock); Berchtesgadener Land (Ethikkommission Land Salzburg); Schmallenberg (Ethikkommission Ärztekammer Westfalen-Lippe); Solingen (Ethikkommission Universität Witten-Herdecke); Ulm (Ethikkommission Universität Ulm); Würzburg (Ethikkommission Universität Würzburg). The study was performed in accordance with the declaration of Helsinki, and all participants gave their written informed consent.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

Robert Bals is a member of the Editorial Board at Respiratory Research.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

12931_2024_2822_MOESM1_ESM.docx

Additional file 1: Supplemental Table S1: Results of (logistic) GEE analyses on the occurrence of at least one exacerbation using data over the course of 4.5 years (visits V1-V5). Only patients who maintained in the study until visit V5 were included. As predictors each analysis comprised one of the comorbidities, the presence of statins and an interaction term between these two factors, as well as the covariates age, sex, BMI, GOLD grade and pack-years. The table shows the odds ratios (OR) and their 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) regarding comorbidities (left column), statins (middle column) and the interaction (right column) for each of the analyses. Supplemental Table S2: Results of (logistic) GEE analyses on the occurrence of at least one severe exacerbation using data over the course of 4.5 years (visits V1-V5). Only patients who maintained in the study until visit V5 were included. As predictors each analysis comprised one of the comorbidities, the presence of statins and an interaction term between these two factors, as well as the covariates age, sex, BMI, GOLD grade and pack-years. The table shows the odds ratios (OR) and their 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) regarding comorbidities (left column), statins (middle column) and the interaction (right column) for each of the analyses.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Frantzi, N., Nguyen, X.P., Herr, C. et al. Statins did not reduce the frequency of exacerbations in individuals with COPD and cardiovascular comorbidities in the COSYCONET cohort. Respir Res 25, 207 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-024-02822-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-024-02822-1

Keywords

Respiratory Research

ISSN: 1465-993X

Contact us