A continuación aparece una instantánea de la página web tal y como aparecía en
25/05/2024 (la última vez que nuestro rastreador la visitó). Esta es la versión de la página que se usó para la clasificación de los resultados de búsqueda. Puede que la página haya cambiado desde la última vez que la guardamos en caché. Para ver lo que puede haber cambiado (sin la información destacada),
ve a la página actual.
In my world dragons are supposed to be an apocalyptic terror upon the world. Even as baby’s they’re a serious threat to a town. So it feels weird to have them be smaller than a horse. So I’m debating just making baby’s large, young huge, https://omegle****/
As a follow up question. What would the consequences of adding a new size since adult and ancient would end up being the same size?
I think the consequences would be fairly minimal. Assuming you increase reach as well where it makes sense, it's really just about how much space it takes up and controls. This could have different impacts on an encounter based on the environment, but assuming you aren't using a map made for a smaller creature I think it would be fine.
As for the second question, note that Gargantuan size is 20 feet or more. The tarrasque is like 100 feet long or something. So you can still have ancients be larger in terms of how much space they take up even though they would be in the same size category as adults.
My homebrew subclasses (full list here)
(Artificer) Swordmage | Glasswright | (Barbarian) Path of the Savage Embrace
(Bard) College of Dance | (Fighter) Warlord | Cannoneer
(Monk) Way of the Elements | (Ranger) Blade Dancer
(Rogue) DaggerMaster | Inquisitor | (Sorcerer) Riftwalker | Spellfist
(Warlock) The Swarm