Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
2020
COLE TCH, SIEBERT-COLE E (2020) FAMILY TREE of LANGUAGES PART I: Indo-European • a selection of 53 Indo-European languages • hypothetical tree from phylolinguistic analyses (chiefly following Rama 2016 and Garrett 2018, adapted) • updated regularly as new data become available • branch lengths deliberate, not expressing actual time scale • number of speakers, countries/regions, and scripts chiefly taken from 'Ethnologue' 22nd edn. 2019 • figures for the number of speakers given as: total world followed by first language speakers in parentheses (all figures approximate/ rounded) • ML (macrolanguage), F (family), G (group) including x number of individual ISO 639-3 coded languages
The Indo-European language family can be represented as follows: 0. Proto-Indo-European, 1. Anatolian vs. other Indo-European, 2. Tocharian vs. Classic Indo-European, 3. Italo-Celtic vs. Central Indo-European, 4. Germanic vs. Nuclear Indo-European, 5. Graeco-Phrygian vs. Satǝm Indo-European, 6. Thraco-Armenian vs. North Satǝm Indo-European, 7. Daco-Albanian vs. East Satǝm Indo-European, 8. Balto-Slavic vs. Indo-Iranian.
2012 •
Abstract There are two competing hypotheses for the origin of the Indo-European language family. The conventional view places the homeland in the Pontic steppes about 6000 years ago. An alternative hypothesis claims that the languages spread from Anatolia with the expansion of farming 8000 to 9500 years ago.
1996 •
This essay presents the case for the concept of overlapping language familiesy. It is argued that Indian languages are an example of such overlapping families.
Journal of Germanic Linguistics
Indo-European Language and Culture. An Introduction. By Benjamin W. Fortson IV. (Blackwell Textbooks in Linguistics.) Oxford: Blackwell, 2004. Pp. xviii, 468. Paperback. £25.992006 •
This paper is about the early history of the Indo-European language family: about its probable 'Homeland', break-up, and branching. There are many different models and theories that claim to trace this process and many more variations of these models. But none of these have managed to build a respectable consensus in favor of it. The history of a language or the pattern of movements of its past speakers can be 'proved' only if we have direct evidence or clear attestation of it from the relevant period. The earliest available texts in IE languages are all from periods millennia after the breakup of its proto form. These archaic forms are mostly incomprehensible and are more mythological than historical. If there are any relevant historical content in these, we have not found the means to identify them. Thus, any theory on these processes can only be based on indirect evidence and subjective inferences.
Article in Klein, Joseph, Fritz, eds., Handbook of Comparative and Historical Indo-European Linguisatics vol. I, Berlin 2017 on the possibilities of Indo-European Cultural Studies.
A stunning result of linguistic research in the 19th century was the recognition that some languages show correspondences of form that cannot be due to chance convergences, to borrowing among the languages involved, or to universal characteristics of human language, and that such correspondences therefore can only be the result of the languages in question having sprung from a common source language in the past. Such languages are said to be "related" (more specifically, "genetically related", though "genetic" here does not have any connection to the term referring to a biological genetic relationship) and to belong to a "language family". It can therefore be convenient to model such linguistic genetic relationships via a "family tree", showing the genealogy of the languages claimed to be related. For example, in the model below, all the languages B through I in the tree are related as members of the same family; if they were not rel...
This research involves discovering branches of Indo-European languages.
NEW APPROACHES TOWARD RECORDING, PRESERVING AND STUDYING CULTURAL HERITAGE IN DIVIDED CYPRUS: PROBLEMS & OPPORTUNITIES
Between Rejection and Coping - Do Turkish Cypriots Have the Right to Conduct Archaeological Research?2023 •
Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management
Project Management Maturity: an Analysis with Fuzzy Expert Systems2012 •
Journal of Animal Science
204 Effects of sorghum silage kernel processing on intake and apparent total tract digestibility of beef heifers2020 •
FUOYE Journal of Engineering and Technology
Assessment of Orange (Citrus Sinensis) Supply Chain Activities in Kano State2019 •
Acta Scientiae et Technicae
Biotecnologia e Biodiversidade: As Florestas Brasileiras Como Fonte De Novos Fármacos Com Propriedades Antitumorais2013 •
2020 •
East Asian Science, Technology, and Medicine
Rose Kerr and Nigel Wood, Science and Civilisation in China, Volume 5, Chemistry and Chemical Technology, Part 12, Ceramic Technology2016 •
Marine Pollution Bulletin
Response to “More surprises in the global greenhouse: Human health impacts form recent toxic marine aerosol formulations, due to centennial alterations or world-wide coastal food webs”2017 •
2017 International Conference on 3D Vision (3DV)
3D Room Geometry Reconstruction Using Audio-Visual Sensors2017 •
National Interests: Priorities and Security
Creation of new advanced technologies as the basis for sustainable development and technological security of the Russian economy2018 •
2014 •
2022 •
2018 •