Passenger 57 (1992) - Passenger 57 (1992) - User Reviews - IMDb
Passenger 57 (1992) Poster

(1992)

User Reviews

Review this title
151 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Standard action-packed movie with the usual two-fisted hero acting in a hijacking
ma-cortes12 December 2006
John Cutter (Wesley Snipes) is an expert security agent who's still mourning the death his wife . He embarks a large plane , L1011-500 "Tristar , assisted by beautiful air hostesses (two gorgeous flight attendants : Alex Datcher and Elizabeth Hurley , one of the earliest film roles). Then , he finds himself accidentally trapped into the middle of an airline Jumbo hijacking executed by an arch-villain terrorist (Bruce Payne) who previously committed numerous terrorists acts . He hijacks the crew and seizes control of it . Cutter must take action confronting the nasty criminal , developing a battle of wits between two charismatic opponents . Meanwhile , Cutter contacts with his airline chiefs (Tom Sizemore and Bruce Greenwood) who want to hide the events .

The film packs nonstop action , suspense , tension , lots of violence when the murders and fighting happen , being quite entertaining . It's a run-of-the-mill action film in which from the beginning to the ending the thriller and emotion is continuous . This film Passenger 57 (1992) was scheduled to air on a Starz Entertainment Group channel the night of 9/11 , what with the themes of terrorism on an airplane, the broadcast was obviously cancelled . Wesley Snipes is top-notch as an action hero , turning into tough action man in films of big budget , just like ¨Murder at 1600¨ , ¨Money train¨ , ¨US Marshall¨ and ¨Blade¨ trilogy ; however , nowadays , he only makes low/medium budget films as ¨Unstoppable¨ , ¨The detonator¨, ¨7 seconds¨ , ¨Chaos¨, ¨The marksman¨ , among others . While on the plane Wesley Snipes reads the book 'The Art of War' ; Snipes later starred in the film ¨The art of war¨ (2000) that was loosely based on the book . Bruce Payne is excellent as the ruthless and extremely intelligent villainous , he plays -as always- magnificently a megalomaniac nasty .

Spectacular musical score by Stanley Clarke , being appropriately adjusted to action . The motion picture was well directed by Kevin Hooks -an usual TV movies director- . Robert Hooks, who plays FBI agent Dwight Henderson in the film , is the father of director Kevin Hooks . The film will appeal to action genre enthusiasts . It's a must see for Wesley Snipes fans .
19 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Forgettable action film
Tweekums21 July 2009
Warning: Spoilers
This isn't a bad film but it isn't exactly a great film either; Wesley Snipes does a good job as airline security expert John Cutter who is in the wrong place at the right time, Bruce Payne is okay as the psychotic terrorist and Alex Datcher is fairly forgettable as the feisty stewardess. For a thriller this is also lacking in any twists whatsoever. We are told who is bad and who is good almost as soon as their character appears.

The film opens with Charles Rane in an operating theatre awaiting plastic surgery, we know he is somewhat insane as he insists in having no anaesthetic. Before the operation can start the police move in and Rane attempts to escape but is eventually captured... now they just have to get him to Los Angeles for trial. Obviously the best way to transport one of the world's most wanting criminals across the US is to put him on a commercial flight with a couple of marshals. Of course Rane's people are on the plane amongst both passengers and crew and shortly after take off they seize the plane. Luckily they hadn't counted on John Cutter the airline's new security expert being on board.

He manages to call the airline and alert them about the hijacking before being briefly captured. He escapes his captors then flees to the plane's storage area where he accesses the avionics bay and forces the plane to dump fuel. This necessitates landing at a small airfield in Louisiana where Cutter jumps from the plane and is promptly detained by the local police who are stereotypical incompetent Southern yokels. While the plane is on the ground Rane and some of his associates get off the plane and flee to a local fair ground where after a bit more fighting he is captured again. That isn't the end though as his people still on the plane threaten to kill more hostages if he isn't freed. Once back on the plane Cutter confronts Rane one last time with the inevitable results on expects from this sort of film.

This isn't a film I'd go out of my way to see but it is okay if you have eighty minutes to kill and want some fairly mindless action. I wouldn't advise buying it unless you are a fan of cheesy action flicks or of Wesley Snipes.
27 out of 38 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
"Charles Rane is not insane"................
ianlouisiana13 February 2010
Warning: Spoilers
Well,at least not according to his brief.Mind you,the completely barmy Mr Rane was banging the brief's face on a desk at the time in a subtle attempt to induce such a ringing endorsement.By anyone else's definition Mr Rane is what the medical profession call a nutjob. "You have blown up two planes this year already"says his brief in a non - judgemental tone. "It's four,actually"Rane says proudly. With the help from some henchpersons he escapes from his escort and goes mano a mano with an ex - cop and airline security expert who,heaven be thanked,is travelling on the same plane. Miss E.Hurley,who can't act for toffee,is one of Rane's little helpers. So far - so appallingly bad. Mr W.Snipes as the cop is a credit to his dentist. As cliché builded on cliché I was forced to listen to the soundtrack as some kind of distraction.It sounded as if it was written by a jazz musician who thought it would be easy money to knock off a quick movie score.That couldn't really be the case - could it? If you believe in watching movies with your thumb up your bum and your brain in neutral "Passenger 57" might just pass muster. If however you require a little bit of flair,just a smidgeon of likelihood and some indication that it isn't all a cynical moneymaking exercise....put it back in the "Special Offers" bin and walk away.
13 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A small winner of a film all round.
RedRoadster28 October 2008
"Passenger 57" is one of the many films that followed in the wake of the action film that re invented the genre, 1988's "Die Hard" with Bruce Willis in the lead. When I first saw P57, rented on video in the mid nineties, I wasn't expecting a re-run of Die Hard, but i was pleasantly surprised at how enjoyable an action flick it was.

Wesley Snipes and Bruce Payne spark well off each other as the troubled hero and psychotic villain. They are given competent support by the rest of the cast, although one of my small complaints is how under utilised the other actors are. That said, Ernie Lively does a nice turn as the local police chief and Robert Hooks (father of director Kevin Hooks) is good as an FBI Agent.

Essentially, Passenger 57 is a solid little action movie which is well paced and has enough intriguing characters and good action scenes to keep you interested right through to the finale. The story is perhaps a little thin and the script could have used a bit more depth to develop the characters, but it's very enjoyable none the less.

Don't view this expecting a great movie, but if you have an hour and a half to kill this film is well worth a watch.
48 out of 62 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Wesley Snipes vs The Rane Of Terror. Or should that be our Pain at the Terror?
hitchcockthelegend9 October 2009
Of all the Die Hard clones there have been, and there have been many! Passenger 57 may just be the worst. The story follows Wesley Snipes' airline security expert John Cutter, who whilst undertaking a flight to L.A. gets embroiled in a hostage takeover led by evil bad man with a troubled childhood, Charles Rane. Cue quips, kicks and death defying tricks as Cutter strikes one for the good guys. Kevin Hooks' film works well enough on a very basic actioner level, due in the main to Snipes. Snipes was six years away from his signature role in Blade, and for sure he is a bona fide action star. As evidenced here, he has the charisma and body motions to carry the film thru its turgid script. It's a script that smacks of the writers sitting round a table and suggesting they put Snipes in a number of tricky situations and used that as an excuse for him to beat the crappola out of everyone. Oh and lets not forget the forced love story waiting to happen as well.

Ultimately it's just a lazy film that is the cash in that many realised it was upon its release. Bruce Payne manfully tries to make the unbalanced Charles Rane truly evil, but doesn't succeed. Liz Hurley, goddess of womanhood that she is, looks uncomfortable holding a gun, while leading lady Alex Datcher is hopelessly out of her depth. While the youthful looking Tom Sizemore and Bruce Greenwood also appear - but both are throwaway characters that you end up wishing we had had more of. Stanley Clarke's score is abysmal, it's the sort of score one expects to hear in a soft core porno movie - you know the kind where the protagonists are making love but they still have their underwear on! Yes that kind. Poor plotting, poor scripting and just about poor in technical execution. I don't ask much of the action genre, I really don't, but at least give the film some soul from which to entertain the popcorn masses. 3/10 for Snipes' fighting and Liz Hurley's legs.
37 out of 63 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Passenger 57
Scarecrow-8810 November 2009
Warning: Spoilers
Airline security expert John Cutter(Wesley Snipes)is on a routine flight when he must rescue hostages on board from a group of terrorists led by mad bomber Charles Rane(Bruce Payne). Rane is so cold-blooded, he asks a passenger if he had a family then proceeded to shoot him just to prove a point to Cutter that he meant business! Luckily, Cutter and flight attendant Marti Slayton(Alex Datcher)escape into the jumbo liner to release the fuel forcing Rane to land it at a rural landing strip near a fairgrounds while a carnival was taking place. Threatening to kill passengers if the sheriff doesn't refuel the plane, Cutter is able to escape, only to be momentarily arrested by police after being knocked out by the concrete from a harsh landing. Agreeing to release hostages if the fuel is brought to the plane, Sheriff Biggs(Ernie Lively)will carry out his demand. While a flood of passengers storm out of the plane, Rane attempts, along with a few of his henchmen, to flee, making their way to the fairgrounds, with Cutter, after escaping from the police subduing him, following in hot pursuit. With some hostages still on board and Rane on foot through a fairgrounds crowd of innocent people, Cutter has his hands full. A plan is in place and it's all about Rane escaping the electric chair.

Boy, does this joker move fast! Like it's star, the movie barely catches a breath, with a locomotive pace. Not a lot of original plot here, to tell you the truth. It has the terrorism on a plane plot that, even by 1992, had rather worn out it's welcome, but with dynamic stars like Snipes and Payne, as the sneering heavy, they inject a little into it's stale material. Funny how the film moves into a plane, out of it temporarily, only to find both hero and villain returning for one last round. It is essentially your typical cat-and-mouse game between Cutter and Rane with precious, innocent lives at stake. As was typical in action films at this time, you have to take a leap of faith and accept what the script sets up regarding Snipes' abilities to take out the bad guys, and thwart the evil psycho's plans.

This was during the time where Wesley Snipes was being groomed as the next action star. He is in solid form in this movie, looking mighty impressive in combat against Rane and his goons. Tom Sizemore has a sizable supporting turn as Sly Delvecchio, Cutter's boss and friend. Early role for a foxy Elizabeth Hurley as one of Rane's terrorists, disguised as a stewardess. Bruce Greenwood is Sizemore's boss, Stuart Ramsey, head of the airline for which they both work. Robert Hooks does what he can with a small role as Special Agent Henderson, with nice support from Lively as the "country bumpkin" Chief of Police who, as a hostage negotiator, gets a bit too big for his britches.
13 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Super generic
briancham19942 June 2020
This film doesn't even work as a "typical" or "average" action movie. It is too dumb and cheesy even by 90s action movie standards. It takes all the cliches of the genre but adds nothing thrilling or memorable. The only entertainment value I got was spotting all the airport related moments that could not happen nowadays.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Starts out good but....
ebiros23 December 2011
Wesley Snipes is about the only thing that's good in this movie. The movie starts out good with interesting situation going on inside the plane. Then the setting moves to the ground, and we see local law enforcement agency and the FBI getting involved, things gets dumb and dumber.

Why they had to abandon the airplane and go into the boring ground scene, I have no idea. They lost all the plot right there and then. The guy who escaped was absolute nobody, so it wasn't interesting even if he did escape. Movie gets worse as it progresses as even the fight scene including Wesley Snipes gets worse.

The stunt at the end was ridiculous. How can a police car catch up with a jet plane that's about to reach take off velocity ?

The fault was with the writer. The movie could have been 100% better if Wesley Snipes was allowed to sleuth around the airplane inflicting damages to the bad guys. Then it would have been a budget version of Die-hard, or maybe better, and the movie surely would have been a classic with sequels.

Too bad that they blew their opportunity, because of poor script writing.
16 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Silly but Entertaining
Michael_Elliott6 September 2012
Passenger 57 (1992)

*** (out of 4)

An airline security adviser (Wesley Snipes) finds himself on board a plane that gets taken over by a notorious hijacker (Bruce Payne). PASSENGER 57 isn't going to go down in history as one of the greatest action movies ever made but I think it has a limited charm to it. There's no question that this thing shouldn't be confused for an "A" picture but if you go into this expecting a little "B" movie then you might find yourself entertained. This is the type of action film that really dumbs everything down because everything that happens just comes across so easy that you'd think being able to hijack a plane, jump off a plane and then get back on it would be something that anyone could do. If you put too much thought into this picture then you're going to see countless flaws and we won't even go into detail about how the terrorist, no matter what's going on, always gets the final say in what happens. The performances certainly help keep the film moving with Snipes perfectly being able to handle the action scenes, the laid back nature of his character as well as the silly one-liners that all action movies have. Snipes makes for a good lead who works well with the supporting cast around him. This includes Tom Sizemore in his small role, which the actor at least brings some laughs with. Elizabeth Hurley is also extremely good in her limited part as is Alex Datcher. Payne easily steals the picture as the sadistic bad guy who eats up every scene that he's in. You can tell the actor is having a good time playing this villain and we in return have fun watching and rooting against him. Again, if you're looking for a big-budget, lots of stunts action film then you're going to be letdown. This is a pretty small movie but I think for what it is the film works well.
7 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Fly Hard with a Vengeance
sol-28 September 2017
When terrorists take over a passenger plane while he is in the bathroom, it is up to an airline security specialist to thwart them in this action thriller clearly modeled on 'Die Hard'. Given the familiarity of the basic scenario, 'Passenger 57' is a surprisingly entertaining affair with Bruce Payne making for a memorable charismatic chief villain, plus there are several well coordinated action scenes that take into account the inherent claustrophobia of being in a plane. With this in mind, it seems quite uncanny how much of the action takes place outside the plane with several minutes spent on a chase through a fairground before the characters find themselves in the air once again. The dialogue is also hardly first rate with the film sorely missing the wit that Bruce Willis brought to the 'Die Hard' movies. Something interesting though is that the film is set up to be a redemption movie with protagonist Wesley Snipes haunted by the death of his wife at the hands of a criminal, and yet the film avoids setting up a near-identical scene to give him a chance to act differently, with Snipes instead having to find an alternative path to redemption. The ending feels more than a little rushed though with limited time spent on Snipes and Payne going head to head. This is an extraordinary short movie too, clocking in at just over 80 minutes, but at least it never outstays its welcome.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Good solid action flick. A must for Snipes fans.
Conan_The_Barbarian2 September 2004
Passenger 57 is an enjoyable and rather underrated action film. Although there is not too much of a storyline, the slick action scenes combined with some very good performances from Wesley Snipes and Bruce Payne kept me entertained from start to finish.

While Passenger 57 offers nothing really new to the action genre, it does offer plenty of fast paced chaos and explosions and combined with some entertaining hand-to-hand combat skills by Snipes, it is certainly better than a lot of other standard action fares out there.

Snipes gives a very good performance as the lead and Bruce Payne is brilliant as the mentally unstable villain. The other cast are somewhat overshadowed by Snipes and Payne, but do an adequate enough job.

Overall I was very pleased by Passenger 57, so much so that it proudly belongs in my DVD collection. A very good choice for action fans and a must for Snipes fans. 8/10.

And don't forget...."Always bet on black!"
70 out of 99 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Fun 90s action thriller
SnoopyStyle17 April 2015
Charles Rane (Bruce Payne) is a ruthless terrorist. The FBI manages to capture him right before he is able to get plastic surgery. Former secret service agent John Cutter (Wesley Snipes) is still haunted by his dead wife. His old friend Sly Delvecchio (Tom Sizemore) gets him an airline security job. Marti Slayton is the brash flight attendant. They are flying out to L.A. Also on the plane, Rane is being transported accompanied two FBI agents. The problem is that Rane's people are also on board and they're armed. Cutter forces the plane to land.

This is simply a fun action thriller. The script has a lot of action and the . It doesn't necessarily take it too seriously. Wesley Snipes delivers the action and Schwarzenegger-worthy one liners. "Always bet on Black!" There is enough wild action. Bruce Payne is terrific. He milks every insane Bond villain move. It is a lot of fun especially if you don't try to dissect everything.
6 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
"Die Hard" meets "Air Force One" minus the excitement, acting, fast pacing and flair for action...
MovieAddict201617 October 2003
Warning: Spoilers
"Passenger 57" is essentially "Die Hard" on a plane, a simple idea that might have worked if it had not been for the fact that two years prior to this film, the sequel to "Die Hard" was, in fact, about an airport and planes. For the record, almost everything about "Passenger 57" is awry--the acting, the action, the pacing, the plotting.... Need I go on?

The (bad/pathetic/weak) plot: John Cutter (Wesley Snipes) is an ex-cop trained in martial arts (or some form of punching and kicking) aboard flight 163 from somewhere to somewhere else. Mid-flight the plane is taken over by terrorists, led by Charles Rane (Bruce Payne), a man who has had some experience with Cutter in the past and who is pleased to see him onboard. By chance of crappy writing, John Cutter manages to escape from the terrorists and hide out on the plane--even though the terrorists know he is there. Even though there are little places to hide on a plane. Even though they're thousands of miles above land. Never mind that.

Back on land, Sly Delvecchio (Tom Sizemore) helps keep balance in the force by agreeing with the terrorists' requests and stalling for time. When the plane lands to (fuel up/serve as a plot device, your pick), John Cutter is thrown from the plane and setup as a terrorist. However, once again he manages to escape from the grasp of confinement and he slips away on a motorcycle to a big fairground where Charles Rane and his cronies just, by matter of convenience, happen to be!

If you think this movie sounds a lot like "Air Force One," you're right. If you think it sounds like "Die Hard," you'd be even more right. The only thing is, both those films had a level of high-voltage fun--"Passenger 57" has none. The pacing is slow and boring. The action, when it finally arrives, is weak and badly executed. Wesley Snipes essentially runs around a lot using karate moves on people. Puh-lease.

There is basically no action whatsoever in "Passenger 57," and what little of it there is comes off as, quite frankly, rather boring. The "suspense" of the film isn't so suspenseful after a while (or, for that matter, from the very beginning). Being trapped on a plane throughout a film isn't exactly the most suspenseful thing possible, but at least "Air Force One" made up for it with plenty of outrageous action sequences. This movie has none. It basically goes like this: Cutter is trapped on plane. Terrorists take over plane. Cutter hides on plane and evades detection in small crevices. Cutter is thrown off of plane. Cutter is captured by police. Cutter escapes from police. Cutter fights terrorist. Guess what the outcome is.

"Passenger 57" is as recycled as it gets. Granted, "Air Force One" hadn't been made by the time this film came out--but "Die Hard 2: Die Harder" had, and it was a heck of a lot better than this. The director of "Die Hard 2" was Renny Harlin, who no doubt could have turned "Passenger 57" into something at least slightly taunt, supsenseful or amusing. The director, Kevin Hooks, doesn't seem to know how to carry a film along at a reasonable pace while keeping audiences' interest.

The writers of this movie, Dan Gordon and David Lougery, need a little lesson in how to craft a good action movie. Believability isn't always necessary in any form of entertainment. But you can't have entertainment without the entertainment value. That's just called garbage--a genre "Passenger 57" fits nicely into.

Director: Kevin Hooks John Cutter: Wesley Snipes Charlies Rane: Bruce Payne Sly Delvecchio: Tom Sizemore Sabrina Ritchie: Elizabeth Hurley

Written by David Lougery and Dan Gordon

1.5/5 stars.

  • John Ulmer
15 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
"I have a feeling it's going to be a very interesting flight"
lost-in-limbo13 March 2012
The tag; "Die Hard" on a plane is pretty much true when describing this uninspired Wesley Snipes action vehicle of the early nineties. A captive terrorist being transported on an aircraft by the FBI is violently freed by his associates and they take the plane hostage. However on board happens to be an airline security specialist who goes about making their life's hell. Durable direction along with Mark Irwin's crisp photography and exhilarating stunt-work (the opening chase sequence). While it might be systematic in its execution (exciting combat where characters get caught, escape, get caught and escape again), but a confident Snipes makes light work of the slight and clichéd material (where we get the usual character/s with a brooding past) to deliver cracking blows taking out the terrorists one-by-one and sharp-one liners ("Always bet on black"). Around this time Snipes had become somewhat of a household name and a Hollywood banker with movie fans. Churning out films like "White Men Can't Jump", "Boiling Point", "Rising Sun", "Demolition Man" and "Drop Zone". This entry might not make much of the dent in Snipes' portfolio, but for the undemanding just wanting some simple action moving at a brisk pace with some venomously psychotic villain performances (led by the exceptional Bruce Payne and an early part for Elizabeth Hurley) and fine support (Tom Sizemore and Ernie Lively). You can't go wrong with the consistently entertaining "Passenger 57".

"I never live in the past"
8 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Indifferent action time-filler.
barnabyrudge12 June 2004
An incredibly brief, uninvolving and dumb thriller, Passenger 57 is a film that Wesley Snipes probably doesn't rank too highly on his CV. Though it is fast-paced and action-packed, it just doesn't give the audience the pay-off they need. The whole thing seems to have been made in great haste, with precious little attention to character, dialogue and plot. If Die Hard was the sumptuous five-course meal of action movies, then Passenger 57 is the half-eaten, under-cooked bacon sandwich.

The (somewhat unbelievable) plot has world-feared terrorist Charles Rane (Bruce Payne) being transported by plane to jail. Someone in the corridors of power has rather foolishly allowed him to be transported aboard a regular passenger aircraft, full of normal, innocent members of society. Inevitably, Rane escapes with the help of some of his accomplices, and within minutes he has control of the plane and the life of every passenger aboard. He plans to trade the safety of the passengers for his freedom. The one thing he doesn't reckon on is the presence of Passenger 57, maverick sky marshal John Cutter (Wesley Snipes), who knows a trick or two when it comes to dishing out pain to the bad guys.

You know just from the plot synopsis that Passenger 57 is riddled with unlikely plot holes. But even if you forgive its silliness, it isn't very entertaining on the level of "dumb fun". Payne as the villain is as camp as Christmas; hero Snipes plays it with utter indifference; the plot rattles along with no rhyme or reason making it awfully hard to care about any of the protagonists; and the climax is such a rushed muddle of a sequence that it comes over more as an anticlimax than anything. It's easy to knock action movies, especially if you prefer something with a bit of depth and believability, but even champions of the "big, cheesy action flick" are likely to come away from Passenger 57 feeling disappointed.
18 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Bathroom break saves the airplane
bkoganbing29 November 2016
Playing the title role in Passenger 57 is airline security expert Wesley Snipes who is on board a flight where known terrorist Bruce Payne is being transported to face justice. Only Payne has other ideas. A whole flock of his confederates are on the flight including one of the stewardesses Elizabeth Hurley. She's a pretty deadly all on her own.

Payne has some scheme afoot and needs the plane for more than just escape. He has to have the plane landed to refuel.

My sheer dumb luck as Snipes is heeding nature's call Payne and his crew miss him. At this point it becomes a deadly cat and mouse game between Payne and Snipes with each exchanging the role of cat and mouse at different points of the film.

Action fans will have no cause for complaint from Passenger 57. The tension is at times overwhelming. It always is in airline films where passengers are helpless thousands of feet above the ground and have no choice but to trust the professionals. This is inherent in every film about an airline flight going back to The High And The Mighty and much further than that.

Snipes and Payne are an evenly matched set of adversaries. Passenger 57 is a tension filled movie right up the end.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Oh no, Marti. I'm going to kill you during.
lastliberal1 June 2007
OK, I do not recommend this movie unless you have 90 minutes to waste and just want some mindless action in the background while you are doing something else.

I like Jean Claude Van Damme, Sylvester Stalone, Steven Seagal, and Wesley Snipes when I want vicarious thrills, loud noise, and furious action. No plots, little dialog to ponder, just action. They all do a good job.

Snipes was his usual self, Bruce Payne made a good terrorist, and Elizabeth Hurley was easy on the eyes.

'Nuff said.
7 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Passenger 57
jboothmillard7 December 2009
Warning: Spoilers
I only heard of this film being mentioned on a countdown of greatest disaster movies, so I thought I might as well see if it deserved a place on the list. Basically, airport security expert John Cutter (Wesley Snipes), still mourning from the death of his wife, and he has accepted the job of chief of security. He boards a plane, as passenger 57, heading for Los Angeles for the annual company meeting, where he also sees the flight attendant he tried to train, Marti Slayton (Alex Datcher). Unfortunately, also being transported on the plane is deranged terrorist Charles Rane (Bruce Payne), who manages to take over with his gang, including fake stewardess Sabrina Ritchie (Elizabeth Hurley). After trying to get help, and briefly meeting Rane, John with the help of Marti manages to land the plane, as it runs out of fuel, but Rane is determined for his plan to continue. So there is some chasing on the ground, through a fun fair, and Rane is caught for a while, but John knows he will only let everyone on the plane go if he is allowed back on. So Rane gets back on the refuelled plane, and John sneaks back on, and after killing all henchmen, all John has to do to save the day is push Rane out the door, no pressure added with the plane crash landing as well. Also starring Tom Sizemore as Sly Delvecchio (named Sly after Sylvester Stallone turned down Snipe's role), Bruce Greenwood as Stuart Ramsey, Robert Hooks as Dwight Henderson, Michael Horse as Forget, Marc Macaulay as Vincent and Ernie Lively as Chief Biggs. Snipes is fine, Payne is alright villain, and the supporting cast, including a then little-known Hurley, are fine. I think the only reason I wasn't convinced was because of seeing guns going off in the plane in mid-flight, there would be creating air-pressure suction all over the plane in reality, but never mind, it's worth watching. Okay!
7 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
"Always bet on black." Average 90's action flick.
poolandrews24 September 2007
Warning: Spoilers
Passenger 57 starts as hotshot ex anti-terrorist Airline security guard John Cutter (Wesely Snipes) takes a job as head of security for Atlantic International airlines, he decides to fly out to Los Angeles to start his new job. Unfortunately at the same time the FBI decide to fly air-plane hijacker & terrorist Charles Rane (Bruce Payne), whose exploits have become known as 'the reign of terror' (get it?), to LA to stand trial which just plain sounds like a dumb idea & as it turns out it was because Charles with the help of sexy babe Sabrina (Elizabeth Hurley) & some of his terrorist mates hijack the plane, kill the FBI dudes & take the passengers hostage. However Cutter manages to throw a spanner in the works & escape down below to jettison the fuel which forces Rane to land the plane, Rane seems prepared & has a back up plan but Cutter is determined to bring him down for good & save the hostages including a stewardess he fancies...

Directed by Kevin Hooks this typically over-the-top 90's action flick is OK but lacks a certain spark needed to elevate it anything above an average time waster. The script by David Loughery & Dan Gordon takes itself pretty seriously & probably wouldn't get made these days, in fact I'm absolutely positive it wouldn't as it deals with terrorists hijacking an American flight &, well, that's just a sensitive issue these days isn't it? The script seems rather silly & far fetched these days especially post 9/11 as the terrorists depicted in Passenger 57 are seemingly able to freely carry guns aboard, impersonate stewardesses & flight attendants as well as take complete control of a commercial airliner very easily. Basically this film has zero credibility & no-one watching it will think it's possible, I'd also say Passenger 57 is one of the top 10 films most likely never to appear as in-flight entertainment. The actual amount of time on the plane in the air is actually quite small as Cutter forces them to land, however it's at this point the film gets really stupid as Rane sneaks off the plane & legs it only for Cutter to magically know where he's going & chase after him. Seriously, if you watch Passenger 57 try to work out how Cutter knows that Rane is headed towards the funfair? He can't know, it's impossible so why does Cutter follow Rane there when as I've said he couldn't possibly know where Rane was headed? The character's are poor, Rane as a villain is never given any motivation for what he does, other to escape obviously but none as to why he is a terrorist is what I meant. The film moves along at a nice pace, it only lasts for about 80 minutes & is never boring, there's enough action to keep one amused & the story is OK if a little weak in places.

Director Hooks does OK, it's a largely forgettable film to be honest. There's a few decent martial arts fights, some shoot-outs & some chases but it never really gets the blood pumping if you know what I mean, it's competent & fairly slick looking but a bit bland & forgettable overall. I'm not sure if this film is trying to be racist but the two main villains are English, I thought that was a bit harsh actually while most of the good guy's are black. One more thing, I don't know if I have a point here but the interior of the plane looks so fake because the isles between the seats are absolutely massive! I usually travel economy so maybe that's why but I've never seen isles that wide on a plane before, never.

Technically the film is alright, it's well made with that big budget Hollywood action film feel about it. Apparently shot in Florida. The acting is OK, Snipes is alright although the script could have used a few more one-liners to lighten his character up a bit, Payne is a decent villain while Hurley (I was just reading her IMDb bio where it says she claims she hasn't watched TV since 1979!!!!!!) looks hot in this & is probably the only time she has played a villain.

Passenger 57 is a decent enough 90's action flick, it's nothing overly special & there are better films out there with similar plots, Executive Decision (1996) anyone? This is passable entertainment, although it's probably only worth a rent rather than a buy.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
A Silly "Shoot It Up, Punch 'Em Out" Movie
sddavis636 January 2010
If the only thing you're interested in when you watch an action movie is guns blazing and fight scenes, then this will satisfy. There's a lot of gunfighting in this one, and Wesley Snipes definitely proves that he knows something about the martial arts. His fight scenes are well done for the most part. In general, though, the movie repeatedly insists on descending into silliness, with a story that makes very little sense, even as actions movies go.

Snipes plays John Cutter, a security expert who's just been hired to be chief of security for Atlantic International Airlines. He boards a flight for Los Angeles not knowing that the FBI is transporting a vicious terrorist on the same flight. The opening scenes involving terrorist Charles Rane (Bruce Payne) and his attempt to escape the FBI by fleeing a plastic surgeon's office, where he was apparently going to have his appearance changed, was pretty dramatic and established the nature of that character reasonably well. Unfortunately, the extended opening development of Cutter seemed unnecessary and overlong. The real problem here though (and where the movie lost all credibility with me), has to do with Rane's plan for hijacking the flight. Sly Delvecchio (Tom Sizemore) - who's one of the bigwigs with the airline - keeps complaining that the FBI didn't tell the airline that they'd use that flight to transport a dangerous criminal. But that makes sense to me. Why tip anybody off? So even the airline doesn't know that he's going to be on the plane. How, then, did Rane manage to get not just one but two of his people on board the plane - not as passengers but as crew? Either he got them hired by the airline specifically for this operation or he recruited two employees. Either way, they'd have to have known in advance that he was going to be on this particular flight and arranged to work this particular flight by bidding on it in advance, because these things are arranged by seniority. Sure, there could have been an FBI mole who tipped him off, but I doubt this decision was made weeks in advance in order to facilitate all these arrangements, and there's still the problem of getting the flight attendant and baggage handler scheduled to work this flight. A rather silly and overly convenient plot device, if you ask me.

Once this is over, there's very little of note and nothing much you remember about it. It's an action flick among action flicks - but even sillier than most, and adding nothing original to the genre. However, I did enjoy Cutter's comment to Rane - "always bet on black!" 2/10
10 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Great action, decent acting, paper-thin plot
emperor_bender3 June 2009
I tried to watch this movie without thinking at all and to just relax but it wasn't the easiest thing in the world to do.

A few things made this movie really great: Wesley Snipes, the music, some of the lines, the action.

Other than those, the movie could have been much better.

Wesley Snipes plays John Cutter, a former airline security expert who is flying on a plane when terrorists happen to take over. Bruce Payne plays Charles Rane AKA "Rane of Terror", a terrorist who leads the attack on the plane. Tom Sizemore plays Sly Delvecchio, Cutter's buddy. Thats all I care to mention actor-wise.

I think Snipes could have used a lot more screen-time or at least more back-story. I barely got to know him.

The movie was in ten places at once, which made it extremely difficult to follow along. However, I still enjoyed the film.

Not a bad mindless movie, but try not to think too much.

6/10.
11 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Just Pass It......
shortround83919 April 2009
I wanna start by saying that I absolutely love "Die Hard", it's one of my favorite films of all time and its the film that changed the action genre forever. In the years following its release, many of the action flicks have borrowed the basic premise of "Die Hard", making it film about a cop or someone along those lines fighting the bad guys in a limited location, whether its on a bus (Speed), a battleship (Under Siege), a hockey stadium (Sudden Death). But now what we get here is "Die Hard on a plane" which goes by the name "Passenger 57".

It's not that good. I really didn't find myself caring about about the cop whose wife was killed in a holdup all because Snipes just doesn't give a lot of emotional depth in here. And its too bad that he wasn't given good material to work with since his lines seem so forced and awkward when he says them. In "Die Hard", it was totally different because Bruce Willis blended into the role of John McClane perfectly, he just soothed out his lines with heart, soul and personality. Snipes just does the opposite.

Also, the main villain Charles Rane didn't interest me that much, 'cause Bruce Payne's performance was somewhat wooden and dry. But I'll admit that the part when the little kid on the plane pretended to shoot him and Rane responded by pretending to shoot him back was somewhat amusing.

The martial arts action was another low-point for me, the sequences seemed to be very stilted and stiff. Every action flick has at least GOT to have good action, there's no denying that. But when I see the kind of action this film has to offer, it doesn't make me feel like I wanna do it in real life to someone I hate.

One thing that wasn't too shabby was the soundtrack and the composers skill to at least save the action scenes from falling apart completely.

I wouldn't call this "boring" to watch, but it's just a little bland and uninteresting, in fact its got a less than 90 minute runtime, so you could watch it if you REALLY, REALLY don't have anything to do.
25 out of 43 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Fun and Action-Packed Drama on Both Land and Air
Screen_O_Genic23 May 2019
Starting on the major plot hole of having a psychopathic terrorist onboard a passenger plane filled with commercial passengers, "Passenger 57" takes one on a wild and fun ride to liberty and justice. Wesley Snipes is the troubled and edgy former head of an anti-terrorist unit who takes on the sinister, heavy-lidded Bruce Payne in a convincing role as Charles Rane, "The Rane of Terror". Chases, fistfights and gunfire bring on the mayhem and there are enough twists to keep one on the edge of the seat. Though a bit short, this is highly watchable and with a good amount of humor to boot. A longtime personal fave, "Passenger 57" takes off as one of the best aeroplane action-dramas popular during the time. For fans of action and just plain good filmmaking, do yourself the favor.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Reverse-Racism At Its Most Obvious
ccthemovieman-14 July 2006
Here's a good example of a racist film - reverse racism in which white people are all the villains, portrayed as either stupid rednecks or just plain dumb people from any area of the country. All are talked down to in a patronizing way by the good-guy Wesley Snipes who only respects his black superior. Imagine if this was made with the reverse colors and all black people were made to look stupid. However, in the Liberal PC world of today, racism like this is okay. Go figure.

In addition, this is another of these low-grade action films where almost all the characters are what you would NOT find in the real world, such as airline executives looking and talking like low-life hoods. To further insult our intelligence, we have bullet-after-bullet fired at close range at Snipes and never hitting him!

One of the most insulting, stupid movies ever made and an wonderful exhibit of how bad Hollywood can get.
27 out of 80 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Solid action flick
phsbb0831 January 2019
I personally can not shut this flick off when it is on. From the great one liners, all star cast, and non stop action , it has it all in my opinion.
10 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed