2.7 vs 3.3
#2
Blunt
Pros and cons all depend on what you plan to do with the truck. Will you ever carry payload in the bed? How much? Will you ever tow? How much would you tow? All these questions can also be answered by looking at their payload and tow ratings. If you'll never tow, or tow very light weights, then maybe the 3.3 is best for you. If you want something with better acceleration and more towing capability, go with the 2.7
https://www.fleet.ford.ca/resources/...-Towing-EN.pdf
Be aware that there is a misprint in the towing guide. Page 20 is supposed to be 5th wheel towing but it's a repeat of page 18's conventional towing rates. So don't go by anything on page 20 for 5th wheel towing.
https://www.fleet.ford.ca/resources/...-Towing-EN.pdf
Be aware that there is a misprint in the towing guide. Page 20 is supposed to be 5th wheel towing but it's a repeat of page 18's conventional towing rates. So don't go by anything on page 20 for 5th wheel towing.
Last edited by BlackBoost; 03-12-2018 at 01:14 PM.
#3
The 3.3 RCSB impresses me with it's towing capability. I think we are going to be hearing good things about this new engine. Lots of power difference between those 2 engines, tho.
#4
Senior Member
#6
Junior Member
I am currently working with my dealer on a number for a truck with this motor.
Keep in mind that the 5.4 3V was 310HP & 365Tq.
The 2.7 at 325HP & 400Tq is downright sexy for a small displacement V6. Coupled with the 10 speed... I'm in love.
That being said, 290HP 265Tq is not such a slouch for a NA motor. However like was said above, if you plan to tow anything ever or carry some weight, the +135tq will be your best friend.
The following users liked this post:
F150Dan (04-22-2023)
#7
Blunt
I could not agree more. I had a loaner 2018 with the 2.7 for a day. It drives like a V8 and I averaged 24mpg...
I am currently working with my dealer on a number for a truck with this motor.
Keep in mind that the 5.4 3V was 310HP & 365Tq.
The 2.7 at 325HP & 400Tq is downright sexy for a small displacement V6. Coupled with the 10 speed... I'm in love.
That being said, 290HP 265Tq is not such a slouch for a NA motor. However like was said above, if you plan to tow anything ever or carry some weight, the +135tq will be your best friend.
I am currently working with my dealer on a number for a truck with this motor.
Keep in mind that the 5.4 3V was 310HP & 365Tq.
The 2.7 at 325HP & 400Tq is downright sexy for a small displacement V6. Coupled with the 10 speed... I'm in love.
That being said, 290HP 265Tq is not such a slouch for a NA motor. However like was said above, if you plan to tow anything ever or carry some weight, the +135tq will be your best friend.
Trending Topics
#8
Junior Member
I am actually comparing two trucks one with the 3.5 & another with the 2.7. My Expedition with the 3.5 burns a little too much for my commute. It's a 2017 with the 6 speed though.
The current leader is a shadow black XLT 2.7 s-crew 3.55:1 rear. I could not get over the power of the 2.7.
I also would like the 6.5 bed. Looks like I'm limited to the 5.5 bed in 4x4 with the 2.7 on the s-crew.
Last edited by blueoval66; 03-13-2018 at 11:04 AM. Reason: additional information
#9
Blunt
How has your economy fared over time?
I am actually comparing two trucks one with the 3.5 & another with the 2.7. My Expedition with the 3.5 burns a little too much for my commute. It's a 2017 with the 6 speed though.
The current leader is a shadow black XLT 2.7 s-crew 3.55:1 rear. I could not get over the power of the 2.7.
I also would like the 6.5 bed. Looks like I'm limited to the 5.5 bed in 4x4 with the 2.7 on the s-crew.
I am actually comparing two trucks one with the 3.5 & another with the 2.7. My Expedition with the 3.5 burns a little too much for my commute. It's a 2017 with the 6 speed though.
The current leader is a shadow black XLT 2.7 s-crew 3.55:1 rear. I could not get over the power of the 2.7.
I also would like the 6.5 bed. Looks like I'm limited to the 5.5 bed in 4x4 with the 2.7 on the s-crew.
#10