When Strangers Appear (2001) - When Strangers Appear (2001) - User Reviews - IMDb
55 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
An excellent mystery thriller!
The_Void18 July 2007
When Strangers Appear wasn't marketed very well to say the least - the trailer makes it out to be another Scream clone - and that's a real shame as this little thriller is an excellent film that really deserves to be more seen! New Zealand born director Scott Reynolds previously made the decent psychological thriller 'The Ugly', but with this film he really upped the bar. The beauty of When Strangers Appear is the fact that for most of the film, the audience never really knows what is going on, and that is exactly how a mystery thriller should be! The film starts off as we follow Beth to work. It seems like an ordinary (boring) day, until a strange drifter walks in. After giving him breakfast, he disappears when three surfers turn up. He claims that the surfers are following him and are also the reason for his stab wound. However, the trio of surfers have a very different story, as it transpires that the stranger appears to be a dangerous psychopath. After a shocking turn of events, Beth finds herself in the middle of an extremely dangerous situation.

This film works thanks to the way that Scott Reynolds builds the atmosphere and tension. The central character, Beth, is very easy to feel for; while the supporting cast are all mysterious enough to generate interest themselves. The film is topped off by a whole host of brilliantly tense situations that help to keep the audience on the edge of their seats. The bathroom scene is the biggest standout in this respect, and is positively nail biting! The isolated setting compliments the story excellently, and helps to build intrigue in its own right. The plot builds nicely throughout, and there's never a shortage of things happening. The fact that the film only features a handful of characters is certainly to its benefit too as it means that the film never loses its focus and this ensures that it's always easy to buy into the plot. It's true that When Strangers Appear isn't very substantial overall, but as a thriller it serves it's purpose well all the way up until the explosive ending and I see no reason why this film wont be enjoyed by anyone who takes the time to watch it. Very much recommended!
21 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Exceptional thriller.
gridoon13 July 2003
In 1997, Scott Reynolds made an impressive writing and directing debut with "The Ugly", although his story was a bit too shallow and his direction a bit overly flashy. This time, with his compelling, perspective-shifting script and taut direction, he achieves moments of true brilliance - so many, in fact, that it's hard to pick just one (the little girl who witnesses a violent struggle but doesn't understand it? The sink that may not hold the weight of a man? The killer silently stalking his victim in the toilets, using an admittedly old trick?). This man could very well develop into the Hitchcock of the next generation - the movie even has its own McGuffin to propel the plot (the computer disk). The first half is essentially a mystery, with plenty of twists; when the truth becomes (somewhat) clear, the movie becomes a full-blown thriller, and it offers one absolutely astounding suspense sequence after another. Don't miss it. (***)
12 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Suspenseful
deadkerouac20 August 2002
Warning: Spoilers
A lonely young woman named Beth (Aussie actress Rahda Mitchell from LOVE & OTHER CATASTROPHES, HIGH ART, and PITCH BLACK) lives in a small town in California with (literally) only five to six residents. She works days at a roadside diner and nights at a motel, both of which were left to her by her late father. A young drifter named Jack Barrett (Barry Watson of TV's 7TH HEAVEN) appears at the diner one day, a knife wound to the abdomen. He tells her that he is being chased, and, soon enough, three men (Josh Lucas, Jonathan Blick, Eryn Wilson), claiming to be surfers, show up (in a Volvo, of all cars). Jack, hiding in the kitchen, tells Beth that these are the men who are chasing him. Jack later collapses in the parking lot, and Beth decides to help him. She gives him a room at the motel, and later also gives the three surfers a room, two doors down. She soon befriends the main surfer, Peter (Lucas). Later that night, Beth takes Jack to a doctor friend of hers, Eric (Steven Ray), who can sew up Jack's wound. Meanwhile, outside, the three surfers wait outside the house in their car, silent. The next day, Eric won't answer his phone. What has happened to him? Beth finds medication in Jack's car. Who can Beth trust? The drifter Jack? The surfers? How about the local (and lone) cop Bryce (Kevin Anderson), whom Beth claims once raped her?

As far as low-budget films go, this one, written and directed by Scott Reynolds, is right on the money in most respects. There are several suspenseful scenes, from Jack hiding in the kitchen while the three surfers make small talk with Beth to Beth hiding in a gas station bathroom stall while the person who is hunting her stands outside the door, switchblade in hand. SPOILER: the best scene involves Jack and Beth hiding in the bathroom while the three surfers try to coax the two out, during which Deep Purple's "Hush" blares loudly on the jukebox.

The use of flashbacks is nice and adds suspense and, in a scene between Beth and Bryce, adds insight into the characters and their motivations. Every actor does their job with conviction, especially Mitchell, whose American accent is so dead-on I would've thought she was American if I hadn't already seen her in earlier films; Watson, who is slowly growing out of his 7TH HEAVEN persona; Anderson, as good here as he was in MILES FROM HOME; and Lucas, who keeps you guessing as to his identity until it is finally revealed. And, you wouldn't really know it unless you're familiar with the territory, but the entire film was filmed in Foxton, New Zealand! I'm from California, and I must say that the beautiful grasslands and coastline of Foxton subbed wonderfully for California, even up to the driftwood.

SPOILER: the ending at the gas station is photographed and shot beautifully with enough suspense to keep you guessing until the very end, but I could've done without the add-on after the credits. 8/10
15 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Very Catchy
princess7angel76 April 2006
Wow...I tell you what I really liked this movie when i saw it. I was sitting home watching lifetime and this happened to come on. I was so enthralled by this movie i couldn't turn away from it. I love Josh Lucas in this movie. I had always been a huge fan of him, like it Sweet Home Alabama. But in this movie you got to see him act in a different way, he actually got to take on a darker roll. I didn't think that it would work but it totally did! This movie was full of twists and turns. Reading the other comments everyone says that they didn't like the ending but i thought that the ending was pretty good. How they made it switch on and on from person to person. It was a little bit hard to follow but in the end it made it all that much more worth it. I would definitely recommend this movie!
10 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Overlooked New Zealand thriller set in rural Oregon
sol121817 January 2010
Warning: Spoilers
***SPOILERS*** It's when drifter Jack Barrett, Barry Watson, showed up at Beth's , Radha Mitchell, out of the way off the beaten track, or main highway, diner that things started getting real interesting as well as deadly. Acting as if he has something to hide, in what turned out to be a mysterious CD, Jack kept looking outside expecting someone to show up looking for him. That didn't take long when this trio of surfers Peter Steven & Roger, Josh Lucas Jon Blick & Eryn Wilson, drove up an hour later.

Terrified and fearing for his life Jack, hiding behind the counter, begged Beth not to reveal him to the three strangers, which what seemed at the time to be against her worst suspicions about him, which she didn't. As things soon turned out the three surfer boys were anything but the happy go lucky lads, looking for the perfect wave, that they seemed to be. Whatever they did and whatever they had against Jack was left up to the viewers and Beth's imagination. But it was enough for them to murder anyone who stood in the way between them and Jack and the CD he had on him that they were so desperately after.

What at first seemed to be the films most weakest point in the end turned out to be its strongest: The mysterious CD that Jack had on him that he guarded with his very life. We never get to know what exactly is on the CD but that's the very reason were so interested in it. Beth for her part slowly starts to believe in what Jack was telling her about the three strangers in that he was suffering from an almost fatal stab wound that they supposedly inflicted on him. Beth is also pestered and threatened by local cop Bryce, Kevin Anderson, whom she accused of raping her and who's wife Lynda, Dra Mckay, who accuses her of having and affair with him. This makes for an interesting side-story in the movie but doesn't add anything to the terror and suspense in it.

***SPOILERS*** It takes a while for Beth to finally be convinced in what Jack was telling her about the three strangers and that's only after Dr. Eric Leonard, Steven Ray, who was treating Jack's knife wound ended up being murdered by them. The three killers lead by the smooth talking and friendly Peter then came out into the open and showed exactly what they were all about with Beth, in Jack accidentally electrocuting himself, on her own in single handedly taking them on! That's until the unexpected hero in the movie gas station attendant Bernie, Michael Lowe, almost by accident showed up on the scene!

Nerve wrecking and tense filled climax with the heroic gas station attendant Bernie, who was savagely worked over by the three thugs, coming to Beth's rescue only to end up losing his life by doing it. It was Bernie's brave action that gave Beth the precious time to set into motion the events that finally lead to the movie's flaming and explosive climatic scene. It was then that Peter & Co. got everything that was coming to them! Everything except the mysterious CD that they were after, and murdered so many people for, all throughout the film!
10 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Fantastic nihilistic voyage
pumaye27 February 2004
A beatiful trip into the cinematographic nihilistic non sense of a story without real meaning, but tight, well written and with a cool music all around. This is a thriller how it should be done, without relaxation, always on the edge of something, full of surprises and with good acting for most of the leads. This is another good surprise from down under, thanks to the misunderstood genius of new-zealander Scott Reynolds, whose The Ugly was something of a miracle, a really disturbing tense horror, not very much appreciated. The female lead is the gorgeous Radha Mitchell (already seen in Pitch Black). What more can I say? Buy or rent this movie and you'll find your money well spent. Thumbs up!!
17 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
only my 3rd IMDB review and it's Australian movie again...
soulcharmer16 September 2003
...and to put it shortly, it's not as intriguing as Pitch Black but far more enjoyable than Lantana on the other hand.

yes it's true, this is only B-grade low-budget suspense thriller where nothing is as it appears to be (speaking of immediate succession of events) but nonetheless I really liked Radha Mitchell in her role, I really liked the humble setup and I really liked the ending where the story bends into a full circle (well, almost).

maybe it's not an art film of the year with heart-breaking scenes where father and son meet after years of nerve-wrecking separation or something but it's quite enjoyable if you give it a chance. I did and wasn't disappointed.

7/10
13 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Very nice one!
filipe-arte15 December 2011
I saw this one years ago and it was a nice discovery.

This is a pure film. All built on its characters and storytelling development.

It's a B movie from Australia - which makes me happier, this is a country that I used to live in - that has nothing but a good story to tell and a good acting.

All set in basically three or four locations in which the art direction and the cinematography took the best out of them, transforming the loneliness and the emptiness of the places in a excellent element of the film.

The editing is very intelligent, always helping the twists of the movie getting more intense and also giving that motion and never letting the tension down.

Bottom line, it's a "old-time-kind-of-movie" in which no rush is seen and things happen when it has to happen.

8/10.
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Not that bad...
MarieGabrielle29 December 2011
Granted the premise has been done, but this is a fun suspense film and also as Josh Lucas in it, so add a few stars.

Radha Mitchell is basically a restaurant/motel owner in a desolate Oregon town. She has a customer (Barry Watson, child actor from "Seventh Heaven" for anyone who recalls that series, circa 1997).

Anyway, odd things start to occur and her doctor friend becomes a victim. Three strangers apparently on vacation drop in, and proceed to terrorize her.

Radha Mitchell is believable though, and has since been in a Woody Allen film ("Melinda and Melinda") so she does a few things right.

Watch for Josh Lucas in recent period piece "Stolen" also with Jon Hamm (from "Mad Men") a nice suspense film recently made in 2009. Overall give "Strangers" a chance. 8/10.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Very cool film
Fulki-Grevell19 September 2003
I say this film a couple of nights ago when I couldn't find anything to watch. Having seen the first couple of minutes I was wondering if I'd made the right decision, I'm glad I stuck with it because this is one very cool film. Twists that keep you guessing, fantastic acting, an unusual ending, splendid locations. And, the absolutely gorgeous Radha Mitchell. See this film, you won't be disappointed.

One question though - what is it with Volvo's? They appear in almost every film I've ever seen!
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A film to keep you wondering...
xselfish_tearsx30 June 2004
In contrast to the other comment written about this film, I actually like this film a lot. In my opinion, it is well acted and the lack of background music in the film helps create a tense atmosphere which will keep you on the edge of your seat. This atmosphere is added to by the way that the film has been made in a small area, due to it's low budget, making it feel quite claustrophobic. The plot of the film never seems quite clear and has many twists and turns within it, making you change you opinion constantly as to who is on whose side. All in all, this is a very good psychological thriller which will keep you thinking all the way through the film and on the edge of your seat at the same time. I'd give this an 8.5 out of 10 as I enjoyed it however it hasn't got the best plot in the world and won't be suited to everyone's tastes.
27 out of 33 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
people don't get it
Thell77 September 2003
The people who have written most of these comments are disappointed of the ending. I say that the ending takes the film a step higher! You don't have to analyze everything and you don't have to come up with meanings that you believe is the idea of the film and then hate them. At least it won't make anyone happier. There is no background music in this film, as I recall, and there are very few people. That sets the mood, and it's a pretty frightening one. Pressuring even. The filming is great, or so I think anyway. My best tip for those who are going to see this movie is that you shouldn't have expectations. This film won't give you all the answers you perhaps will be looking for but it gives you a feeling of something, and if you ask me it's just what films are for - Making you think and/OR making you feel something. In this case, the mood. Beautiful. Top score.
23 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Extremely Exciting Tense Film
MagicStarfire30 July 2006
Warning: Spoilers
9 Stars out of 10.

This film was exceptionally well done, tight storyline, good pacing and action, and very good performances by the entire cast.

The only reason I did not give it 10 was because they fail to tell the viewer what IS on that computer disc. Of course, if this is based on a true story (I don't know if it is or not), then I guess the girl telling the story would not know the answer to that.

The story begins with Beth, a very nice looking young woman (Radha Mitchell) walking down a dusty road to her job at the small, out of the way diner she runs.

She's hoping for a lift, but instead gets a dusting from a car that passes her by. The driver, a young man, turns up shortly afterward at the diner.

He is behaving somewhat mysteriously and looks to be a drifter or perhaps someone wanted by the police.

Beth, nonetheless, gets to conversing with him - perhaps because she's lonesome or bored or just curious.

No one else is in the diner, and then three young men show up together in a car. The first young man hides behind the counter in the diner and indicates to Beth that these three men are after him. He tells a story that he accidentally cut them off on the road and that they caught up with him, forced him off the road, beat him, and stabbed him.

Beth doesn't call the police. She doesn't like cops, especially the local one, Bryce (Kevin Anderson) - for a very good reason - as we discover.

As the story progresses, we don't know who is telling the truth and who is lying.

Is Peter (Josh Lucas)(one of the three men who arrived together), helping Beth out because he is smitten with her, or is it something more.

Is Jack (the young man who was stabbed)(Barry Watson), a schizophrenic in the grip of an delusional episode? Or are Peter and his three associates the true villains? What is the connection between these four men? And who can Beth turn to as the net around her tightens?

I saw this on the Lifetime channel, but it is definitely way above the usual. This kept me on the edge of my seat, and kept me guessing throughout.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Excellent, just a little shaky at the end.
Jill_valentine23 April 2006
I'd never heard of it before either, but it was on TV in the middle of the night, and I copped Radha Mitchell's name in the credits. Radha Mitchell could make a root canal an engaging watch, bless her heart.

The story goes like this: Beth runs a diner and a motel on a desolate stretch of highway. She's a bitter loner, justifiably distrustful of the local authority and wildly unpopular with her neighbours. The only person who bothers speaking to her is the jealous hellbitch sending her hatemail. Her routine is broken by a scruffy, antsy stranger coming to the diner in a stolen car. Grateful for the interruption, and out of sheer bloody-mindedness towards the local lawfolk, Beth gives him a breakfast. She figures out that his agitation is closely linked to the fresh stab wound in his gut, but she figures this out just as more strangers arrive, this time a group of laid back surfers. Stranger #1 freaks out and threatens to kill her unless she hides him from the newcomers. Either the first guy or the second guys are nuts... which is it? What follows is sort of like... Duel, on foot. There's no background music, the desert locations are few enough to feel claustrophobic, Beth barely survives by only her wits and stubborn guts, and the questions just keep coming. Are the surfers a threat? Is the guy crazy? How did he get hurt? How come that fountain of gasoline looks so much like water, and how do three people and a stab victim brawl around in it without any irritation? Why is said gasoline so selectively flammable? Why does the local crazywoman hate Beth so much? Since when does Oregon have desert? But then it stumbles. After three quarters of a wire-tight, cat and mouse thriller, a major plot-point turns out to be largely redundant, and our characters get all MacGuyver on each other. It's a shame that the ending is so madly out of step with the rest of the film, but three quarters of a great film will do me fine, and Mitchell remains predictably and apparently effortlessly excellent, whether she's freaking out or fighting back.
7 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
One of the best thrillers I have seen for a long, long time.
maria_damkjaer5 February 2006
Warning: Spoilers
A lot of the discussion seems to be about the last two minutes of this film, which seems unfair, but actually makes sense because the ending, for me, is the main beauty of the film. I have seen many films spoiled by a silly ending, but this is not one of them. The ending is perfect. This film is fast-paced, with constant turns and surprises, a real, classic thriller basically - and throughout the film there are long scenes where almost nothing happens, just suspense building up, and then it explodes in panic and headlong flight. You never really understand what it is all about, and that, for me, sends the film right up there with "The Birds" and other thriller classics. You don't always have to have things explained to you, sometimes there is a strange beauty in the things that you don't understand. So watch this film is you want to see something a little different, guaranteed no boring exposition and long-winded explanations. This film is an attempt to make a thriller that doesn't have to prove itself, that doesn't need an excuse to exist, that simply just works on the basis of atmosphere and mood. This has to be one of the best thrillers I have seen for a long, long time.
10 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
gripping neo-Hitchcockian thriller
awalter15 May 2007
"When Strangers Appear" (2001) is just the sort of film I'm a sucker for. It's a tense, neo-Hitchcockian thriller with a crisp, clean visual style, a forceful sense of place, several great suspense sequences, very effective camera work, and one hell of a paranoid mood. The story concerns a young woman who for 48 hours becomes entangled in a mysterious manhunt when her path crosses with the wrong people on the Oregon coast. Or, as I really like to tell folks, it's about a waitress being chased by diabolical surfers.

The film was written and directed by New Zealand director Scott Reynolds. For me his first film, "The Ugly," was close to unwatchable, but then he released "Heaven," which showed a lot of promise. (And with any luck he'll break his 6-year dry spell and bring us something else soon.) Radha Mitchell and Josh Lucas are both very, very good in "When Strangers Appear," as is Kevin Anderson in his supporting role. The film has a few flaws, however. This includes a few too-self-conscious moments and the casting of Barry Watson as Jack, the man on the run. Still, the film is a must-see for fans of tense contemporary thrillers that lie in the shadow of Hitch, or for anyone who's up for the sort of gripping, old-fashioned good time provided by films like "Red Rock West," "Nick of Time," and "Breakdown."
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Taut, Expertly Written Thriller
vidalia1529 October 2001
When Strangers Appear is a tautly directed, excellently written sleeper of a thriller. Reminiscent of the best of Hitchcock, director Scott Reynolds has a keen knack of showing us just what we need to see when we need to see it. This not only keeps us at the edge of our seats but constantly pulls us in and out of the driver's seat so that we are behind the scene observers of the action sometimes and right alongside the characters at other times.

The film is a virtual roller coaster of emotions and plot twists that ultimately leave us fully satisfied. The film is a "people aren't always who they seem to be" psychological thriller with Lynch-esque overtones: We don't always know what's happening or why and that's okay. It all adds to the overall paranoia the film creates.

A minor movie with a major entertainment factor.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Predictably unpredictable
=G=11 August 2002
"When Strangers Appear" is a B-movie suspense/thriller flick which is little more than one long string of obvious stalk/scream/run/relax contrivances. This kinetic flick is all about three guys who may be psycho and one other guy who may be psycho running around like rats in a maze looking for a babe (Mitchell) who has something they want. In spite of all the obvious flaws from poor character development to an incorrect spelling of an anti-psychotic drug on a pill bottle, "WSA" does manage nominal no-brainer excitement, builds to a crescendo, and smirks at you at the end. Okay for couch potatoes in the mood for some nail biting escapism. (C)
6 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Not that bad
fordwagonnut30 July 2006
I caught this movie on the late movie. Never heard of this movie, I would guess it was a flop in theaters. But I really liked it overall, it may be a tired idea of small towns in the middle of nowhere, with a limited amount of charters, but it still stood up as a good over all film. If you're not into Hollywood "hero saves the day" cookie cutter type movies, this might be for you.

I'm not going to give out what I saw, there are tons of spoilers, but I thought Volvo wagons where driven by environmentalists or doctors, not killers? Also, if this was modern time (2001), when dose a 1971 Dodge Polara become a squad car?
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Superb!
eflemieux9 August 2001
Warning: Spoilers
I have seen this movie at the 2001 Montreal Fantasia film festival. Minor spoilers.

Just one word: Wow. A young woman runs a diner by a now deserted highway. A penniless young man walks and she offers him a free meal... Then the famous strangers appear... This movie has more plot turns than a carnival ride. I lost count of how many times my suspicions jumped from one character to another. Great scriptwriting. The movie could be considered slow by some standards but the interest is well maintained all through the duration. It somehow reminded me of Blood Simple from the Cohen brothers. Great acting. The ending is vaguely reminiscent of the first John Woo US productions, a little bit over the top. Stay for the duration of the credits for a nice tongue-in-cheek surprise.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
no money but great ideas
jbherment27 July 2002
Best(?)known for his post-Se7en "Ugly" movie Scott Reynolds literally blows our mind in the most simple and visceral way. Far away from his MTV' s camera work of his first feature, he now chills the audience with fast paced plot, mysterious characters and sharp direction. The way he plays with our expectations is simply amazing as it forces the viewer to constantly go back and forth about his perception of characters. Reynolds plays with clichés and takes his story to a conclusion that leaves you breathless. With a terrible cast and a sharp visual style (great use of the 2.35 scope aspect ratio)the movie is a feast for the eye and a menace to your heartbeat.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
decent thriller
Kirpianuscus21 April 2017
far to be great, it is a correct homework.and, for me at least, memorable for few tricks who are useful for create more than sketches of characters but realistic images of different types. the rules of thriller are respected, the story has many twins, the music represents inspired frame for story, the atmosphere of a small place in front with danger is plausible and Radha Mitchell does more than a good role. the basic virtue - the use of many clichés from genre in wise manner. and, in same measure, the science to explore ambiguity in smart manner. short, a decent thriller. maybe, little more. because it gives more than violence and tension, blood or innocent victims. but a story and not bad characters.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
I couldn't NOT watch it.
pttibg23 December 2010
I'm a dial twitcher & world weary...pretty much have seen it all already. Turned this on TV & watched a little & switched to another channel. Had to turn back...it was that compelling. Highly recommend for all the reasons any of the other reviewers did AND that it held my interest, which is a good enough reason for me to watch anything. Had to suspend belief to buy that this many very good looking people, ESPECIALLY Josh Lucas, who could easily be a candidate to fill the shoes of Paul Newman with those eyes, would be doing such evil things or living such strange lives. Must've been something real important on that CD.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Without a doubt the worst movie I ever thought I was liking
janne_w29 January 2005
I'm a fan of psychological thrillers. A big fan. I'm also a person that dislikes clichés and scenarios that are overused (most often in this type of movie.) I believe this movie had a lot of promise in the beginning, then when you got to know Radha Mitchell a little better, something about her really bugged me. I think she's capable of better. She overacted her attitude. Her kind, sweet face leaves you feeling betrayed. Why couldn't they give that girl a little more personality and (considering her personal story, which is very fuzzy at best) a little move savvy sense? Josh Lucas was *brilliant* in this movie. I think he honestly was the best of the bunch. His character's weirdness was so believable.

Likewise, I enjoyed watching Barry Watson. I hope that his future roles give him a little more "meat" to act from. I honestly believe he played this role the best he possibly could have. There just wasn't a whole lot there to draw from.

Overall, I was left with a feeling of slightly having wasted my time at the end, because the end of this movie was a huge blank. It left me with a feeling that the movie was not the same one I started watching so long ago... too long to get to that empty ending. I honestly wish they would have at least told what was on the CD. Big bummer.
5 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
interesting thriller vibe
SnoopyStyle5 January 2016
Beth (Radha Mitchell) runs a roadside diner next to a desolate highway. Jack Barrett (Barry Watson) shows up out of nowhere in a dirty car with a surf board on top. Peter (Josh Lucas) and two other guys show up looking for the beach. Jack hides from them claiming they're going to kill him and her.

I like the empty roadside diner. I wouldn't mind if the movie stayed there as a minimalist psychological thriller. The movie loses a little something by moving on. It gets muddled and confused by adding too much stuff. I lose some patience by the time of the McGuffin CD. The other thing is that this is noticeably not Oregon. It would even be cooler to set this in New Zealand. The third thing is that this movie needs to take place at night. That would increase the intensity by half. I like the general indie mystery thriller vibe. However it tries to do so many twisty thrills that I don't think they all work.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed