Descarga la app de Kindle gratuita y comienza a leer libros Kindle al instante en tu smartphone, tablet o computadora no se requiere un dispositivo Kindle. Más información
Lee instantáneamente en tu navegador con Kindle para web.
Con la cámara de tu teléfono celular: escanea el siguiente código y descarga la app de Kindle.
The Flivver King: A Story of Ford-america Pasta dura – 30 junio 1984
Precio de Amazon | Nuevo desde | Usado desde |
Pasta dura
"Vuelva a intentarlo" | $763.25 | — |
Pasta blanda
"Vuelva a intentarlo" | $455.41 | $521.99 |
- Kindle
$125.54 Leer con nuestra Aplicación gratuita - Pasta dura
$763.25 - Pasta blanda
$455.41
- Número de páginas264 páginas
- IdiomaInglés
- EditorialCharles H Kerr Pub Co
- Fecha de publicación30 junio 1984
- ISBN-100882860550
- ISBN-13978-0882860558
Detalles del producto
- Editorial : Charles H Kerr Pub Co (30 junio 1984)
- Idioma : Inglés
- Pasta dura : 264 páginas
- ISBN-10 : 0882860550
- ISBN-13 : 978-0882860558
- Opiniones de los clientes:
Opiniones de clientes
Las opiniones de los clientes, incluidas las calificaciones por estrellas de los productos, son útiles para que otros usuarios obtengan más información acerca del producto y decidan si es el adecuado para ellos.
Para calcular la calificación global por estrellas y el desglose porcentual por estrellas, no utilizamos un promedio simple. En cambio, nuestro sistema considera aspectos como la fecha de la reseña y si el autor compró el artículo en Amazon. También se analizaron las reseñas para verificar la fiabilidad.
Más información sobre cómo funcionan las opiniones de los clientes en AmazonMejores reseñas de otros países
"The first panic lasted several days; then it passed, and there was a lull, full on anxiety. President Hoover called a council of business leaders to discuss what was to be done, and these big medicine men assembled, and agreed that the country must have confidence, and they told the country to have it (...) The only thing he could think of (the US President, Herbert Hoover) was to have Congress vote huge sums to his friends and beneficiaries, the great banks and corporations ( ...) The theory was that this money would seep down to the consumers and promote trade. But what happened was that the money stayed right in the banks where he put It ; they couldn't lend it unless they could see a chance of profit, and how could a business man promise a profit when he couldn't find anybody who had money to spend? It was the end of an era".
Does it sound familiar? Upton Sinclair explains how governments and bankers addressed the economical crisis. His story is only too familiar and somehow disturbing : they proposed more or less the same remedies, and made more or less the same promises than today, eighty years later. Are they smarter now? Or we will have more of the same ineffective medicine?
Otherwise, the book is written in a clear and engaging way, easy to read, because it was a booklet aimed primary, to a special public, the Union workers.
Ford eventually "goes bad", such as in the Great Depression when he laid off workers, just like every other business that didn't want to go bankrupt. Another example of his turning attitude would be the example of his conveyor belt. The horrors of the common worker doing only one simple task while sitting and getting paid way more than any other average worker out there. The book attempts to convey this as de-humanizing, but comparing the workplace to other locations of that age, it seems like luxury. Finally the book attempts to create an image of a dictator for Ford by pointing out how he eventually modeled every car the same, he took choices away from the consumer and forced them into buying one particular product. (Understand here, this vehicle was for the common man, and instead of seeing it as means for equalizing the classes, Sinclair took this in the negative light of "dictator" instead. This car could be purchased by rich and common alike. It baffles me as this seems to contradict Sinclair's well known ethics.)
Overall I think this book was just trying attack one of the few successful capitalists that weren't actually bad, but revered. I get it, "Capitalism is bad, no matter what".
Did I like the novel? No, not really. I wasn't very surprised with the presented biased, after all, it is Sinclair. Still, read this with care, it's non-fictional, fiction. The story line is not true, though there are "genuine facts" interlaced in the novel, but they're typically presented in a negative manner. Sinclair was hoping to create a movement like he did with The Jungle, a public uproar, which admittedly was needed. However this novel did not receive much attention, possibly because Ford really wasn't this demon Sinclair makes him out to be.