Unten ist eine Momentaufnahme der Seite angezeigt, wie sie am 04.06.2024 angezeigt wurde (das letzte Datum, an dem unser Crawler sie besucht hat). Es handelt sich um die Version der Seite, die für das Ranking Ihrer Suchergebnisse verwendet wurde. Die Seite hat sich möglicherweise seit der letzten Zwischenspeicherung geändert. Damit Sie sehen können, was sich geändert hat (ohne die Markierungen), navigieren Sie zur aktuellen Seite.
Bing ist nicht für den Inhalt dieser Seite verantwortlich.
Marvin Minsky -- one of the fathers of computer science and cofounder of the Artificial Intelligence Laboratory at MIT -- gives a revolutionary answer to the age-old question: _How does the mind work?_
Marvin Minsky -- one of the fathers of computer science and cofounder of the Artificial Intelligence Laboratory at MIT -- gives a revolutionary answer to the age-old question: _How does the mind work?_
Minsky brilliantly portrays the mind as a _society_ of tiny components that are themselves mindless. Mirroring his theory, Minsky boldly casts The Society of Mind as an intellectual puzzle whose pieces are assembled along the way. Each chapter -- on a self-contained page -- corresponds to a piece in the puzzle. As the pages turn, a unified theory of the mind emerges, like a mosaic. Ingenious, amusing, and easy to read, The Society of Mind is an adventure in imagination.
Holist: "I'll prove no box can hold a mouse. A box is made by nailing six boards together. But it's obvious that no box can hold a mouse unless it has some 'mouse-tightness'or 'containment.' Now, no single board contains any containment, since the mouse can just walk away from it. And if there is no containment in one board, there can't be any in six boards. So the box can have no mousetightness at all. Theoretically, then, the mouse can escape!"
Citizen: "Amazing. Then what does keep a mouse in a box?"
Holist: "Oh, simple. Even though it has no real mousetightness, a good box can 'simulate' it so well that the mouse is fooled and can't figure out how to escape." (查看原文)
It was never supposed [the poet Imlac said] that cogitation is inherent in matter, or that every particle is a thinking being. Yet if any part of matter be devoid of thought, what part can we suppose to think? Matter can differ from matter only in form, bulk, density, motion and direction of motion: to which of these, however varied or combined, can consciousness be annexed? To be round and square, to be solid or fluid, to be great or little, to be moved slowly or swiftly one way or another, are modes of material existence, all equally alien from the nature of cogitation. If matter be once without thought, it can only be made to think by some new modification, but all the modifications which it can admit are equally unconnected with cogitative powers.
... (查看原文)
It's a neat approach, however, in the past 25 years, nothing truly significant has been achieved along this line. A well explained exposition nevertheless.
can we really study brain/conscious via this simple, mechanic approach? what is the right level of abstraction to make it feasible? seems one classical example of showing the major differences of mind...can we really study brain/conscious via this simple, mechanic approach? what is the right level of abstraction to make it feasible? seems one classical example of showing the major differences of mindset between west and east, mechanical vs holistic(展开)
can we really study brain/conscious via this simple, mechanic approach? what is the right level of abstraction to make it feasible? seems one classical example of showing the major differences of mind...can we really study brain/conscious via this simple, mechanic approach? what is the right level of abstraction to make it feasible? seems one classical example of showing the major differences of mindset between west and east, mechanical vs holistic(展开)
"Marvin Minsky - one of the fathers of computer science and cofounder of the Artificial Intelligence Lab at MIT - gives a revolutionary answer to the age-old question How does the mind work? Minsky brilliantly portrays the mind as a socieyt of tiny componen...
(展开)
Guildford
机械工业出版社2016版
张小明
机械工业出版社2016版
bingli401
wyc
机械工业出版社2016版
10 有用 Byzaboo 2016-02-17 12:19:23
“明斯基对于心灵认知机制和功能性质的论述，粗看充满了洞察力，细看也不过是一系列越来越细致的推测罢了。 刚拿起这本书的时候我乐观地以为会看到一系列支持行为主义或者神经科学研究的论证，但是这些部分占全书的比率实在是太小了。 除掉具体的新发展（概率推理等）而言，本书的过时性主要在于将人脑看成一种相互竞争的agent组成的集体这一观点并不具有什么变革性了。明斯基本人在书中展现出的处理复杂问题的方法论也仅仅... “明斯基对于心灵认知机制和功能性质的论述，粗看充满了洞察力，细看也不过是一系列越来越细致的推测罢了。 刚拿起这本书的时候我乐观地以为会看到一系列支持行为主义或者神经科学研究的论证，但是这些部分占全书的比率实在是太小了。 除掉具体的新发展（概率推理等）而言，本书的过时性主要在于将人脑看成一种相互竞争的agent组成的集体这一观点并不具有什么变革性了。明斯基本人在书中展现出的处理复杂问题的方法论也仅仅是自下而上、分而治之而已。 总的来说，对于那些想找些能够激发创造力的、关于心灵的阅读材料的人来说，这本书还是非常不错的，但对那些想读点不是这么悠闲、更具科学性的研究的人来说，就没必要读了。 (展开)
2 有用 Manchild 2016-03-21 06:02:20
你能想象一个中坚还原论者，引用的案例都是浪漫主义诗歌么？还原自然智能，造就了人工智能。
1 有用 郦十久 2012-05-21 02:07:48
It's a neat approach, however, in the past 25 years, nothing truly significant has been achieved along this line. A well explained exposition nevertheless.
0 有用 Alkis_Tangelis 2023-01-03 22:38:53 澳大利亚
can we really study brain/conscious via this simple, mechanic approach? what is the right level of abstraction to make it feasible? seems one classical example of showing the major differences of mind... can we really study brain/conscious via this simple, mechanic approach? what is the right level of abstraction to make it feasible? seems one classical example of showing the major differences of mindset between west and east, mechanical vs holistic (展开)
0 有用 Silly cat 2016-08-23 04:36:16
So insightful. So funny.
0 有用 Alkis_Tangelis 2023-01-03 22:38:53 澳大利亚
can we really study brain/conscious via this simple, mechanic approach? what is the right level of abstraction to make it feasible? seems one classical example of showing the major differences of mind... can we really study brain/conscious via this simple, mechanic approach? what is the right level of abstraction to make it feasible? seems one classical example of showing the major differences of mindset between west and east, mechanical vs holistic (展开)
0 有用 6＊9＝42 2021-09-29 18:37:11
【Others】【A】散修1st.有许多精巧的思维模型，尤其喜欢censor and humor一章。
0 有用 Sa☀️ 2021-07-15 11:03:10
通篇从各种纬度阐述了部分与整体的关系；以及从部分组合成为整体的过程中，各种场景的组合逻辑……比较浅，扫盲休闲读物。
0 有用 Nekromantik 2018-11-17 05:53:47
复习到神经网络时候想到了补标
0 有用 兔团子 2017-11-30 01:34:31
很多思考，真是令人拍案叫绝。不过读到一半，觉得自己的思路有点跟不上了