FurMark Scores, Comparative Charts (v1.9, 1.10, 1.13, 1.14)

112 thoughts on “FurMark Scores, Comparative Charts (v1.9, 1.10, 1.13, 1.14)”

1. samsi suardi 2012/04/14 at 13:21

   Why u no include radeon 7970?
2. JeGX Post Author2012/04/14 at 13:24

   In few moments I hope, the HD 7970 will be benchmarked. Currently I’m benchmarking the HD 6970 but I have some problems with my X58 testbed.
3. SMiThaYe 2012/04/16 at 19:40

   Please clarify: you state the benches are 1080 preset but also burn-in test mode – those are two separate button in 1.10.0 unless it’s the 15-min burn-in?

   My 5970 was 3731 1080 preset which puts it above the 6970 CF – I know it isn’t that good!
   http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=55545
4. JeGX Post Author2012/04/16 at 19:46

   Yes you’re right, I changed a bit the burn-in test mode (actually it’s a checkbox in the Settings box).

   The score of your HD 5970 looks correct, because
   3505 points for the HD 6970 CF is get with PowerTune = 0%. With PowerTune set to +20%, the HD 6970 CF gets around 4700 points.
5. hurte 2012/04/17 at 08:59

   y have a 560ti, it s not here and y have note that when y run the program the gpu works at 475mhz :S
6. JeGX Post Author2012/04/17 at 12:06

   @hurt: I don’t have all available cards on the market (fortunately, otherwise the benchmarking session will never end… 😉 ).
7. mrje 2012/04/17 at 19:37

   I have a gt8500 and i scored {SCORE:95 points (1 FPS, 60000 ms)} is that correct?
8. BugattiD 2012/04/21 at 13:53

   I got 3515 points with my HD5970… Higher than the HD7970!
9. BugattiD 2012/04/21 at 13:58

   EDIT: with 1080 preset
10. Moeen 2012/04/24 at 07:25

    HD4850 685/1050, I scored one notch more than 5770 @ 1141 on 720p preset.
11. Sandy 2012/04/26 at 17:10

    i got a 413 score for ati mobility radeon 550v. is that right?
12. Sandy 2012/04/26 at 17:13

    and i forgot to mention this but the resolution was 1024*768 at 720p
13. Sandy 2012/04/26 at 17:17

    lately i have been experiencing autoshutdown problems while playing games. can anyone comment on this regarding the above observed data. thanks in advance!
14. Peter 2012/04/26 at 20:05

    My goodness, how in the world did I completely miss this post? way too many places to follow up with and update these days I guess
15. Peter 2012/04/26 at 20:53

    ok. As much as I hate to feedback on a hard day work of blood & sweat, it seems work itself is still in progress, thus I continue. There’s a headline all over a week ago.

    http://www.techpowerup.com/164027/1366-x-768-The-Most-Popular-Screen-Resolution-Overtakes-1024-x-768-StatCounter.html

    I understand you’ve chosen 2x 16:9 (and 1x 16:10, leaving out 4:3) where baseline is set at 1280×720 but the condition of “full-screen” isn’t applicable for the aforesaid mainstream 16:9 monitors (1366×768) as it simply wont switch (tested). You can either exempt “fullscreen” in this case or provide a reconsidered base-line for 16:9. Though later would have unfairly greater burn-in stress-level compared to former one, exclusively in case of Intel HD IGP’s. You know all I’m interested these days, is in Intel HD GFX 😉 which are probably still under-testing as aren’t there in above charts. Hope this helps in some way.
16. Peter 2012/04/26 at 21:41

    Jerome, somethings wrong here. I ran the test @ 1280×720, following your criteria, with exception being windowed and not full-screen as crap 19-inch “HD-LED” wont switch to full at that resolution. Results:
    SCORE: 130 points (2FPS, 60000ms)
    so whats’ wrong? well check the 4th line:
    FPS: mn=3, mx=5, av=2
    I swear I literally stared at the average the whole 60 seconds (plus warm-up) throughout 120+ frames. Tested more than twice. It remained at “avg:4” in warm-ups and never went below “avg=3” during benchmarking, the whole time.

    So what’s the formula here my man. Its not adding up. How come 5+3/2=2 eh?
17. Peter 2012/04/26 at 22:01

    Oops, my bad. I meant (and 1x 4:3, leaving out 16:10) instead of (and 1x 16:10, leaving out 4:3) in above (second last) post. BTW, am using v1.10.0. Bugs: Not displaying any logo (Intel/otherwise) in top-right box, “Renderer” stating “Intel HD Graphics” when the actual IGP is HD 2000 (same driver v2656)
18. James 2012/05/07 at 00:13

    I only got 1488 points (24 FPS, 60000 ms).

    Nvidia GTX 560 1GB DDR5
    Windows XP 32 Bit
    GPU core: 830 MHz, memory: 2004 MHz
    Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 870 @ 2.93GHz

    Is that about right?? Sounds quite low to me 🙁
19. James 2012/05/07 at 00:14

    Oh was 1280 x 1024 dpi by the way with No Anti Aliasing!
20. Griffin 2012/05/18 at 16:06

    http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=63006
    1280×720 on GTX 670
21. duggie 2012/05/27 at 14:55

    Max GPU Temp: 69°C
    Resolution: 1280×720 (FS) – AA:0 samples
    FPS: min:29, max:32, avg:30 – OPTIONS: DynBkg
    GeForce GTX 465
    GPU core: 607 MHz, memory: 1603 MHz
    Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q9300 @ 2.50GHz
    Windows 7 64-bit build 760
    2046 MB
    3125 MHz
    SCORE:1800 points (30 FPS, 60000 ms)
22. ch3r0k33j03 2012/05/30 at 11:42

    XFX 2GB 6950—

    Stock settings (800/1250) – 1696/28FPS@1080

    Stock 6970 (880/1375) – 1776/29FPS

    My 6950 OC (900/1390) – 1871/31FPS@1080

    While an overclocked 6970 will still smash my 6950, I’m VERY happy with 31FPS on the 1080 test…!

    Can’t wait to get another one of these suckers and crossfire them but until then, Witcher 2 is pretty pleased with this overclock totally maxed even ubersampling
23. Seibukisan 2012/05/31 at 14:55

    I tried to benchmark 9800GTX at 720p with no AA and GPU crashed after like 15 seconds. 🙁
24. jason 2012/06/01 at 02:24

    3940 score on 1080p with my single 6970 2gb is this seems really good
25. Advans@ 2012/06/27 at 15:17

    3 – Custom Preset: 1280×1024

    Settings: 1280×1024 fullscreen, 0X MSAA, 60 seconds, dynamic background, burn-in test mode.

    radeon 5670, win xp 32-bit
    score: 610 points, temp: 65 celcius

    without fullscreen: 851 points
26. Advans@ 2012/06/27 at 15:33

    2 – Preset:720

    Settings: 1280×720 fullscreen, 0X MSAA, 60 seconds, dynamic background, burn-in test mode.

    radeon 5670, win xp 32-bit
    score: 940 points, temp: 65 celcius
27. KOLANICH 2012/07/17 at 09:41

    Max GPU Temp: 70°C
    Resolution: 1920×1080 (W) – AA:8 samples
    FPS: min: 14, max:20, avg: 16 – OPTIONS: FX DynCam
    System Info
    Renderer AMD Radeon HD 6800 Series (1002-6739)
    Drivers Catalyst 12.3 -8.961-120405a-137813C-ATI (4-5-2012)
    Clocks GPU core: 860 MHz, memory: 1100 MHz
    CPU Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 6600 @ 2.40GHz
    CPU Speed 2395 MHz
    System Memory |2046MB
    OS Windows 7 32-bit build 7601 [Service Pack 1]
28. KOLANICH 2012/07/17 at 10:16

    ps vendor is msi
29. Jake 2012/07/20 at 01:31

    Hi,

    I just ran the benchmark on 1080p and 1080*1680 and got this:
    13FPS and 836 score

    Is that bad if so what could be causing this?

    PC Specification:
    ASRock Z68 Extreme7 Gen3
    CM HAFx FULL TOWER WINDOW
    Intel Core i7 2700K OEM UNLOCK
    6GB(3×2)DDR3 Tri-Chan Corsair Vengeance 2000Mhz
    1GB Asus GTX 560 Ti DCU2*TOP*
    1TB WD CAVIAR BLACK WD1002FAEX
    1000W OCZ-ZX1000W-UN ZX Gold
    Killer 2100 Gaming NetworkCard
30. Andrew 2012/07/23 at 18:59

    my 7950 smoked the 680 in this haha http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=75233

    and in the 1080p one

    http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=75234
31. Kyle 2012/07/30 at 21:56

    ATI Radeon HD 5770 GPU max temp got to 99… how bad is this… and should I do the full test… 99 was at about half and I just didnt like it being that hot
32. Mark 2012/08/09 at 11:28

    @Sandy Instability can be because of OC going to far or an insufficient power supply. If you have overclocked, scale it back a little. Update drivers etc too. Might help.
    I ran my MSI 7770/OC to 1160mhz single card and got a 1680 with the 1920 x 1080 burn in test. I am getting a second card soon so i will post the CF results when i can.
    Oh and i modified my fan settings to run at 80% at 50 Cel and 100% at 70 cel, i had a steady temp of 60 at peak.
    I have a Phantom 410 with 1 stock intake and 1 Premium intake both 120mm, 1 120mm stock exhaust at the rear and a 140mm prem and 120mm prem exhaust at the top through a corsair H100 Radiator.
33. Mark 2012/08/09 at 11:33

    I should also mention,
    Sabertooth 990FX
    FX 8120 @ 4ghz
    8GB DDR3 @ 1600
    700W FSP Aurum PSU
    Windows 7 Ultimate 64 bit
    Running windows from an SSD but Furmark from a WD blue drive
    FYI
    If any of that might affect results
34. EGDesignSVC 2012/08/09 at 20:44

    http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=78098 i should be 2nd on list 3600points for radeon 7950
35. EGDesignSVC 2012/08/09 at 21:15

    @Andrew try setting your graphics
    Core Voltage—- 1031(mV)
    Core Clock—- 950(MHz)
    Memory Clock—- 1375(MHz)
    Power Limit—- 0-5% start at 0 then go to 5 one at a time running benchmark after every increase
    fan speed I have on 100% but thats personal preference on what you do for that.
    But you should see a good difference
    let me know how it goes egdesignsvc@gmail.com
36. EGDesignSVC 2012/08/09 at 21:20

    http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=78113 for 720p same setting as above
37. NOOB4EVER 2012/08/11 at 02:41

    http://img515.imageshack.us/img515/3289/62160830.jpg

    2 x gtx680 liquid on z77 platform
38. Sammus 2012/09/04 at 13:33

    I seem to have a problem (and many others too if you google), no matter how I set my clocks on my 7950, furmark runs at a constant 32fps and gives ~1900. This seems to occur with 7850,7870,7950 and some green cards like 660Ti according to google. It’s obviously not a correct score, and every other benchmark it gets its expected score in. Same with furmark 1.9.x and 1.10.x Any ideas???! D:
39. JeGX Post Author2012/09/04 at 14:49

    @Sammus: what about the Powertune settings? See this article for details on powertune.
40. blowan80 2012/09/22 at 17:36

    yeah man i beat the number 2 on 1280-720 with5650 points runnin core i3 and gtx 480
41. panzo007 2012/09/25 at 15:23

    Just did the 15min run and scored 4913 thats kind higher points than the top no 1 lol at 54FPs.
    GPU core: 900>1020 MHz, memory: 1250>1450 MHz
    Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3570 CPU @ 3.40GHz.
    Sapphire Radeon HD 7950 oc
42. DeepDiver 2012/10/03 at 22:36

    I get a failure when I try to Submit results. I am registered. ???
43. lenny23 2012/10/21 at 21:07

    720 preset: 2218 points (36 FPS, 60000 ms)
    1080 preset: 1306 points (21 FPS, 60000 ms)

    Phenom II X3 720 2.8 ghz.
    4 GB RAM DDR2 800 mhz.
    Shapphire Radeon HD 6850
    Win 7 64-bit

    Is that OK??
44. wasder 2012/10/27 at 22:39

    Idle temp: 47°C
    Peak temp: 94°C
    BURN-IN SCORE: 1345 points
    13190 frames, 14 FPS
    FPS: min:15, max:16, avg:14 – OPTIONS: DynBkg
    Resolution: 1920×1080 (FS) – AA:0 samples
    CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) II X2 245 Processor
    System memory: 4094 MB
    OS: Windows 7 64-bit build 7601 [Service Pack 1]
    GPU: ATI Radeon HD 5770
45. Palan 2012/10/29 at 11:10

    WTF? 1080p and over 2500 points with HD 7870… Max. temperature 57°C.
    Scores on this page must be bad…
46. gav 2012/10/30 at 03:24

    I also get failure when i try to submit results and im also registered shame really i’d be top of that chart now dagnammit gigabyte oc edition 7970 4978points only 58 frames though at 1080 max temp 72 min temp 34 cat 12.8 phenom ii 955 be at stock 3.2ghz. Ive never topped any table tis a crying shame lol sort it out please.
47. Jarl 2012/11/05 at 22:08

    i5-3570k @ 4.2ghz
    MSI GTX 660TI PE with a small OC
    8gb Corsair Vengance 1600mhz
    Windows 7 Ultimate 64bit

    BURN-IN SCORE: 3107 points 30728 frames, 34 FPS, 72°C 1920×1080

    This any good?
48. hmmmmm 2012/11/15 at 00:14

    GTX 680 (stock cooling) @
    GPU core: 1228 MHz, memory: 3402 MHz
    2600K@ 5.2Ghz (water) and
    8GB DDR3 1800 + SSD

    Burn in 15min 1080p BURN-IN SCORE: 4638 points
    46102 frames, 51 FPS, 87°C
    FPS: min:51, max:53, avg:51

    Still cant play skyrim in surround with enb.. Need MORE POWER 🙂
49. Silens 2012/11/30 at 08:02

    MSI Radeon 7750 Stock cooling
    Core Clock: 900mhz <–max (+70mhz)
    Memory Clock: 1150mhz (+25mhz)
    Dynamic background
    Burn-in
    Duration: 5min
    Resolution: 1440×900 (Max supported. crap monitor x.x)
    MSAA: 0x

    AMD Athlon II X4 630 2.8ghz
    4gb DDR3 ram.

    Score 396. 3488 frames, 11fps, 56°C

    I haven't cranked up the memory clock very far as i'm new to OC'ing, using MSI Afterburner. I'm not really sure why i can only grab 11fps tho. I cant test under 1080. But can in 720. But I feel like this is quite low compared to my old 6850. Is this a limitation based on my card, Or simply my other hardware being sub-par?
50. sladjan 2012/12/02 at 16:58

    SCORE:95 points (1 FPS, 60000 ms)

    ATI Radeon HD 5450 (1002-68F9)

    Catalyst 12.8 – 8.982-120727a-145524C-ATI (7-27-2012)

    GPU core: 650 MHz, memory: 600 MHz

    Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 4400 @ 2.00GHz

    2046 MB

    Windows 7 32-bit build 7601 [Service Pack 1]

    Did his good or bad? Thanks
51. KalvinJ 2012/12/18 at 10:19

    http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=100493
    SCORE: 3778 points (62 FPS)

    Submitted by kalvinj (anonymous mode) on December 18 2012, 9:11 am

    Bench duration: 60 seconds
    Resolution: 1920 x 1080
    MSAA samples: 0
    Window mode: fullscreen

    Primary renderer: AMD Radeon HD 7970
    Device ID: 0x1002 – 0x6798
    GPU clock: 1050 MHz
    Memory clock: 1500 MHz
    Graphics drivers: Catalyst 12.10 – 9.002-120928m-148276C-ATI 9-27-2012
    GPU temperatures (start/end): 39°C / 72°C
52. KalvinJ 2012/12/18 at 10:21

    http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=100494
    SCORE: 5627 points (93 FPS)

    Submitted by Kalvinj (anonymous mode) on December 18 2012, 9:14 am

    Bench duration: 60 seconds
    Resolution: 1280 x 720
    MSAA samples: 0
    Window mode: fullscreen

    Primary renderer: AMD Radeon HD 7970
    Device ID: 0x1002 – 0x6798
    GPU clock: 1050 MHz
    Memory clock: 1500 MHz
    Graphics drivers: Catalyst 12.10 – 9.002-120928m-148276C-ATI 9-27-2012
    GPU temperatures (start/end): 44°C / 71°C

    Number of GPUs: 1
    GPU0 – Vendor: 0x1002 – Device: 0x6798 – Max GPU temp: 71 °C – Max GPU load: 99 %

    CPU: IntelR CoreTM i5-3570K CPU @ 3.40GHz
    CPU speed: 3403 MHz
    Operating system: Windows 8 64-bit build 9200 No Service Pack
53. Artanis 2012/12/21 at 14:38

    SCORE:4324 points (72 FPS, 60000 ms)

    full screen 1280 x 720

    1200/1375
    catalyst 12.11 beta 11

    56°C fan:%68
54. Puutuu 2013/01/03 at 05:39

    Why is there no 6850 listed? My 6850 cyclone OC gets 23fps. Surely it should be around 30fps, like the 5850.
55. Sniflheim 2013/01/10 at 02:49

    My pair of overclocked 460’s gets just over 5000 points with the 720p test. That’s crazy, is that even possible? That would mean I’m beating a 680!
56. Willi 2013/01/11 at 00:56

    Its pretty strange.
    I ran the Test with my Asus GTX 560 Ti 1GB DDR5( Burn in benchmark 1920x 1080) and got a Score of 2559 points. The max. Temperature was 78°.
57. SniperNinja 2013/01/11 at 21:57

    4789 points (79 FPS, 60000 ms)with two EVGA GTX 460’s. Who’s laughing now. 🙂
58. chris 2013/01/22 at 01:21

    6569 points (72 FPS) with two MSI GTX 670’s. Who’s laughing now. 🙂
59. Ruan 2013/01/23 at 15:23

    Asus AMD Radeon HD6870
    Bench duration: 15min
    Resolution: 1920 x 1080
    MSAA samples: 0
    Window mode: fullscreen
    Burn-In score 2585points(28 FPS)
    Min temp 60°C
    Max temp 92°C
60. unknown601 2013/01/25 at 00:34

    I beat the top score for the 6970 i got 4784 points (79 FPS)

    http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=107774
61. nobody333 2013/01/30 at 14:39

    nvidia geforce gt520
    bench duration:15min
    resolution:1920×1080
    Burn-In score:217 (3Fps) “so fast” 😉
    Min temp 44C° Max Temp 84C°
    Fan: 75%
62. razor179 2013/02/08 at 23:16

    Overpity and epic fail0rs with dual radons, you s**k everywhere with your garbage graphic cards.

    http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=110734

    Only one but fast!!
63. александр 2013/02/27 at 00:55

    GeForce GTX 660/PCIe/SSE2 (10DE-11C0)
    скамьи Продолжительность: 15 мин
    Разрешение: 1920 х 1080
    Window режим: полноэкранный
    Burn-In оценка 2825 points (30 FPS)
    Минимальная температура 38 ° C
    Максимальная температура 66 ° C
    Windows 7 64-bit build 7600 [No Service Pack]
64. shock 2013/03/10 at 02:47

    Sapphire Radeon 7870xt 2gb ddr5
    max temp: 79C
    max fps in full HD: ~43
    score: 2864pts
65. Stephen 2013/03/21 at 19:57

    Max GPU Temp: 39°C
    Resolution: 1920×1080 (FS) – AA:0 samples
    FPS: min:86, max:87, avg:85 – OPTIONS: DynBkg
    GeForce GTX 670/PCIe/SSE2 (10DE-1189) SLI
    9.18.13.1407 (2-9-2013) – GL:nvoglv64
    GPU core: 1005 MHz, memory: 3105 MHz
    Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770K CPU @ 3.50GHz
66. JEK 2013/03/30 at 07:38

    Cross 7970 1000/1450
    Furmark – 1920×1080
    Score – 9387
67. Aleksander 2013/04/24 at 13:53

    BURN-IN SCORE: 491 points
    4497 frames, 4 FPS, 62°C

    ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5650 (1002-68C1)
    Catalyst – 8.723.8.2-100920a-105610C-Sony (9-20-2010)
    GPU core: 450 MHz, memory: 790 MHz
    Windows 7 64-bit build 7601 [Service Pack 1]

    Does that sound alright?
    Please answer to mail: aleks2990@hotmail.com
68. Banshee 2013/04/26 at 22:45

    BURN-INSCORE:2145 points (35 FPS, 60000 ms)
    7850
    Catalyst 13.2
    GPU core: 1165 MHz, memory: 1375 MHz
    ya better then a 580 😀
69. Banshee 2013/04/26 at 23:02

    ^that was at 1080p
    at 720p i got 3963
70. Captain 2013/05/16 at 02:06

    Burn-INSCORE: 2618 points
    72 degrees C
    Catalyst 13.1
    GPU core: 950MHz
    GPU mem: 1300MHz
    1080p
71. Javier 2013/05/16 at 19:20

    7970 x1
    34°C
    Catalyst: 13.5
    GPU core: 1380MHz
    GPU mem: 1800MHz
    1080p
    SCORE: 4437 points

    http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=127093
72. daymon 2013/05/27 at 13:30

    SCORE:679 points (11 FPS, 60000 ms) Max GPU Temp: 58°C Resolution: 1280×720 (W) – AA:0 samples FPS: min:12, max:13, avg:11 – OPTIONS: DynBkg GeForce GT 630/PCIe/SSE2 (10DE-0F00) 9.18.13.1407 (2-9-2013) – GL:nvoglv64 GPU core: 940 MHz, memory: 890 MHz AMD Athlon(tm) II X2 250 Processor 4050 MHz 4093 MB Windows 7 64-bit build 7601 [Service Pack 1]
73. imprimis 2013/05/31 at 10:52

    SCORE: 2716 points (45 FPS)

    Submitted by imprimis (anonymous mode) on May 31 2013, 9:45 am

    Bench duration: 60 seconds
    Resolution: 1920 x 1080
    MSAA samples: 0
    Window mode: fullscreen

    Primary renderer: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680
    Device ID: 0x10de – 0x1180
    GPU clock: 1005 MHz
    Memory clock: 3004 MHz
    Graphics drivers: 9.18.13.2018 5-12-2013 – GLnvoglv64
    GPU temperatures (start/end): 39°C / 77°C

    Number of GPUs: 1
    GPU0 – Vendor: 0x10de – Device: 0x1180 – Max GPU temp: 77 °C – Max GPU load: 99 %

    CPU: IntelR CoreTM i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz
    CPU speed: 3400 MHz
    Operating system: Windows 7 64-bit build 7601 Service Pack 1
74. Dar 2013/06/01 at 04:54

    Saphire 7870 got me a 3354 on the Burn in benchmark. 1090t 6 core processor 8 gigs ram.

    Getting a new 8350 machine with a gtx 780 next week and I will run same exact test.
75. kcostell 2013/06/06 at 23:01

    Running the 1920×1080 on my HD 6670 gave me a whopping 531 pts (4891 frames, 5FPS, 62°C)

    This seems surprisingly low to me. Is it about what I should be expecting though?
76. Ariel 2013/06/28 at 18:26

    Max GPU Temp: 80°C
    Resolution: 1920×1080 (FS) – AA:8 samples
    FPS: min:12, max:15, avg:12 – OPTIONS: XB FX DynBkg

    renderer: GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST/PCIe/SSE2 (10DE-11C2)
    drivers: 9.18.13.2018 (5-12-2013) – GL:nvoglv64
    clocks: GPU core: 1084 MHz, memory: 3004 MHz
    cpu: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q6600 @ 2.40GHz
    system memory: 8Gb DDR2 (PC2-6400)
    os: Windows 7 64-bit build 7601 [Service Pack 1]

    SCORE:11442 points (12 FPS, 900000 ms)
77. brandon 2013/07/11 at 01:43

    BURN-IN SCORE: 9226 points
    92038 frames, 102 FPS, 110°C
    Resolution: 1920×1080 (FS) – AA:0 samples
    FPS: min:92, max:112, avg:102
    Renderer:GeForce GTX 480
    Clcok:GPU core: 700 MHz, memory: 1848 MHz
    CPU:Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3930K CPU @ 4.70GHz
    CPU speed:4709 MHz
    system memory:16324 MB
    OS:Windows 7 64-bit
78. brandon 2013/07/11 at 01:44

    on the 15Min burn in
79. John M 2013/07/13 at 22:11

    BURN-IN SCORE: 299 points

    2690 frames, 44 FPS, 81°C
    Resolution: 1920×1080 (FS) – AA:0 samples
    FPS: min:45, max:46, avg:44 – OPTIONS: DynBkg

    GeForce GTX 760/PCIe/SSE2 (10DE-1187)
    9.18.13.2049 (6-21-2013) – GL:nvoglv64
    GPU core: 1241 MHz, memory: 3004 MHz
    Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4770K CPU @ 3.90GHz
    3900 MHz/16337 MB
    Windows 7 64-bit build 7601 [Service Pack 1]
80. Patr 2013/08/04 at 20:30

    SCORE:35 points (0 FPS, 60000 ms)
    Max GPU Temp: 0°C
    Resolution: 1024×768 (W) – AA:0 samples
    FPS: min:1, max:3, avg:0 – OPTIONS: DynBkg
    ATI Radeon 9550 / X1050 Series (1002-4153)
    Catalyst 10.2 – 8.593.100-100210a-095952E-ATI (2-10-2010)
    clocks not available
    AMD Athlon(tm) XP 2500+
    1830 MHz/1535 MB
    Windows XP 32-bit build 2600 [Dodatek Service Pack 3]
81. c[00]LsPoT! 2013/08/06 at 17:35

    SCORE:4800 points (80 FPS, 60000 ms)
    Max GPU Temp: 80°C
    Resolution: 1280×720 (FS) – AA:0 samples
    FPS: min:80, max:81, avg:80 – OPTIONS: DynBkg
    GeForce GTX 670/PCIe/SSE2 (10DE-1189)
    9.18.13.1422 (3-14-2013) – GL:nvoglv64
    GPU core: 1280 MHz, memory: 3121 MHz
    Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600K CPU @ 3.40GHz
    3402 MHz (real: 4402 MHz) / 16348 MB
    Windows 7 64-bit build 7601 [Service Pack 1]
82. Emilio 2013/08/08 at 13:21

    BURN-IN SCORE: 4642 points
    46093 frames, 51 FPS, 76°C
    Resolution: 1920×1080 (FS) – AA:0 samples
    FPS: min:50, max:65, avg:51 – OPTIONS: DynBkg
    AMD Radeon HD 7900 Series (1002-6798)
    GPU core: 1050 MHz, memory: 1425 MHz
    Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600K CPU @ 3.40GHz
    system memory:8172 MB
    Windows 7 64-bit build 7601 [Service Pack 1]
83. babbott165 2013/08/21 at 17:43

    Burn-in Score: 2306 points

    22704 frames, 25 FPS, 70’C
    Resolution: 1920×1080 (FS) – AA:4 samples
    FPS: min:23, avg:25 – OPTIONS: DynBkg

    System Info:
    Renderer: Geforce GTX 670/PCIe/SSEE2 (10DE-1189)
    Drivers: 9.18.13.2680 (8-18-2013)-GL:nvoglv64
    Clocks: GPU core: 1188 MHz, memory: 3004 MHz
    CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770K CPU @ 3.50GHz
    CPU Speed: 3510MHz
    System Memory: 16330 MB
    OS: Windows 7 64-bit build 7601[Service Pack 1]
84. Boy 2013/08/23 at 18:28

    Nvidia geforce GTX 550 ti
    1280*1024 score was 976 with 16fps is it alright?
85. bahamut 2013/09/05 at 00:05

    ich sage nur

    ASUS P8Z77-VLK
    System Info:
    Renderer: Geforce x2 sli GTX670/PCIe/SSEE2 (10DE-1189)
    Treiber: 9.18.13.2680 (2013.08.18)-GL: nvoglv64
    Uhren: GPU: 1188 MHz, Speicher: 3004 MHz
    CPU: Intel (R ) Core (TM) i7-3770K 4x CPU@3.50GHz / 8x cpu virtuell mit cpu boost 3,9 ghz pro kern
    CPU-Geschwindigkeit: 3510MHz
    Arbeitsspeicher: 16330 MB ddr3
    OS: Windows 7 64-bit build 7601 [Service Pack 1]
    festplatte 1 x ssd samsung 130gb
    und 2x westerndigital 500gb und 32mb cache ….
86. bahamut 2013/09/05 at 00:14

    BURN-IN SCORE: 5842 points

    58156 frames, 64 FPS, 91°C

    Resolution: 1920×1080 (FS) – AA:0 samples

    FPS: min:65, max:66, avg:64 – OPTIONS: DynBkg

    GeForce GTX 670 x2 /PCIe/SSE2 (10DE-1189)

    9.18.13.2049 (6-21-2013) – GL:nvoglv64

    GPU core: 953 MHz, memory: 3004 MHz

    Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770K CPU @ 3.50GHz

    CPU Speed 3605 MHz

    system memory 16329 MB

    Windows 7 64-bit build 7601 [Service Pack 1]
87. briag45 2013/09/21 at 22:27

    19418 frames, 21 FPS, 79°C
    Resolution: 1920×1080 (FS) – AA:0 samples
    FPS: min:22, max:23, avg:21 – OPTIONS: DynBkg

    XFX Radeon HD 6850 Double D
    AMD Radeon HD 6800 Series (1002-6739)
    Catalyst 13.9 – 13.152-130830a-162200C-ATI (8-30-2013)
    GPU core: 775 MHz, memory: 1000 MHz
    AMD Phenom(tm) II X3 740 Processor
    CPU: 3013 MHz
    RAM: DDR3 GSKILL Ripjaw 16383 MB
    Windows 7 64-bit build 7601 [Service Pack 1]
88. briag45 2013/09/21 at 22:28

    BURN-IN SCORE: 1972 points
89. denim025 2013/09/24 at 11:23

    67848 frames, 83 FPS, 79°C
    Resolution: 1920×1080 (FS) – AA:0 samples
    FPS: min:81, max:87, avg:83 – OPTIONS: DynBkg
    GeForce GTX 680/PCIe/SSE2 (10DE-1180)
    9.18.13.2723 (9-12-2013) – GL:nvoglv64
    GPU core: 1241 MHz, memory: 3445 MHz
    AMD FX(tm)-8150 Eight-Core Processor
    CPU: 4616 MHz
    RAM: 16383 MB
    Windows 7 64-bit build 7601 [Service Pack 1]
90. Peter 2013/10/03 at 08:19

    SCORE:2827 points (47 FPS, 60000 ms)
    Max GPU Temp: 90°C
    Resolution: 1920×1080 (FS) – AA:0 samples
    FPS: min:47, max:49, avg:47 – OPTIONS: DynBkg
    GeForce GTX 560/PCIe/SSE2 (10DE-1201)
    9.18.13.1407 (2-9-2013) – GL:nvoglv64
    GPU core: 952 MHz, memory: 2257 MHz
    Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2700K CPU @ 3.50GHz
    3500 MHz 16289 MB
    Windows 8 64-bit build 9200
91. jtandru 2013/10/05 at 19:23

    wont submit scores. 2 different tests on 15 min burn. first was on saved profile 4 and cant remember if it was set to my current res of 1920×1080. second was using prof 5. just ran a 3rd with profile 5 to write the results down. using msi afterburner. profile 5 is my comfort level and pretty sure its pretty high setting (see below) as im a noob at using this kind of software.

    amd a4 5300 3.4, stock clock settings
    8gb mem installed (factory), will expand to the 32 at a later date
    galaxy geforce gt610 2gb

    results test 3:
    CC 998
    Shad 1996
    MC 602

    Temp at 50% 64c
    Temp at 100% 66c
    Fan Speed at 50% of test 74-76%
    Fan Speed at 100% of test 76-77%
    Frames 2250
    Score 264

    temps seem to be really good and runs WoW very smooth. saving for a better graphics card for sure but this seems to work well for what it is.
92. jtandru 2013/10/05 at 19:26

    should mention OS win8 64 bit
    amd a4 5300 3.4ghz cpu

    as stated the cpu is NOT overclocked and last reported running at 3.67
93. jtandru 2013/10/05 at 19:28

    3.37* as 3.67 would be clocked. hate it when i do that lol
94. Rogerthat1945 2013/10/27 at 17:40

    Score 2192 for crossfire 2x$100 HD7770 cards.
    59Deg C.
    @ 2xAA
    @ 1920×1080
    Average 36fps.

    Hope that fits the bill until I can get a bigger better card for this new 27-inch Asus steroescopic 3D monitor.
95. Rogerthat1945 2013/10/27 at 17:46

    Second test 5-minutes or so later.

    Score 2231 for the crossfire 2x$100 HD7770 cards.
    63Deg C.
    No AA this time
    @ 1920×1080
    Average 38fps.

    AA doesnt do much slowing at x2.
96. rogerthat1945 2013/11/14 at 19:11

    My new build got 6081

    Everything set to max for the 15-minute burn.

    1080p Asus (3D) Monitor.

    I thinks its pretty good.

    Max temp 66 Deg C.

    Frames 67fps Average (66fps to 68fps)

    ANNO iChiLL HerculeZ GTX 780

    using a Z87 Sabertooth & i7 4770.

    Card standard o/clocking used.

    16Gb XPG 1866 Ram.

    Windows 8.1 vomit.

    Otherwise good for Battlefield 4.
97. Luke 2013/11/19 at 04:15

    http://oi44.tinypic.com/14l3r0g.jpg

    15 min burn test (FX, Dynbkg)on a Geforce GTX 650 Ti
98. jon72 2013/11/23 at 19:31

    What about the GTX 560?
    I have one and I have only 569 points so I want to compare with other scores
99. shizon 2013/11/24 at 16:09

    SCORE: 4376 points (72 FPS)

    November 24 2013, 2:19 pm

    Bench duration: 60 seconds
    Resolution: 1920 x 1080
    MSAA samples: 0
    Window mode: fullscreen

    Primary renderer: Gigabyte Windforce 3x OC NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780
    Device ID: 0x10de – 0x1004
    GPU clock: 1019 MHz
    Memory clock: 3004 MHz
    Graphics drivers:
    GPU temperatures (start/end): 37°C / 65°C

    Number of GPUs: 1
    GPU0 – Vendor: 0x10de – Device: 0x1004 – Max GPU temp: 65 °C – Max GPU load: 99 %

    CPU: IntelR CoreTM i7-4770K CPU @ 3.50GHz
    CPU speed: 3499 MHz
    Operating system: Windows 7 64-bit build 7600 No Service Pack
100. Chandrian 2013/11/24 at 22:39

     http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=152562

     3534 points with a stock oc (735/1010) 5970 @1920×1080. Pretty much okay considering the processor I have, good temps too :3

Comments are closed.