[MH3] White Orchid Phantom : r/magicTCG Skip to main content

Get the Reddit app

Scan this QR code to download the app now
Or check it out in the app stores
r/magicTCG icon
r/magicTCG icon
Go to magicTCG
r/magicTCG
A banner for the subreddit

A diverse community of players devoted to Magic: the Gathering, a trading card game ("TCG") produced by Wizards of the Coast and originally designed by Richard Garfield. Join us discussing news, tournaments, gameplay, deckbuilding, strategy, lore, fan art, and more.


Members Online

[MH3] White Orchid Phantom

Leak/Unofficial Spoiler
r/magicTCG - [MH3] White Orchid Phantom
Share
Sort by:
Best
Open comment sort options
u/AutoModerator avatar
Moderator Announcement Read More »

Take that, [[Thunder Spirit]]!

u/DurangaVoe avatar

RL collectors in shambles

I'm convinced that power creep is just a conspiracy to deal with the fact that they couldn't reprint Thunder Spirit by simply raising the power level of the game to the point that they wouldn't want to reprint it anyway.

Thunder Spirit - (G) (SF) (txt)

[[cardname]] or [[cardname|SET]] to call

u/Amracool avatar

Fucker got EVISCERATED lmao. Is this the first truly strictly better card? Would assume so considering all the hullaballo about the reserved list and functional reprints

presumably you mean "strictly better than RL card"?

This isn't the first time WoTC printed a card that's strictly better than an RL card. The first time was [[Eladamri's Call]], way back in Planechase in 2001. Strictly better than [[Altar of Bone]]. And then there was [[Rune-Scarred Demon]], which is strictly better than [[Mold Demon]]. Then, [[Moonveil Regent]], which is strictly better than [[Roc of Kher Ridges]].

[[war horn]] vs [[mightstone]] is another example. I think a lot of players assume that RL = the most powerful cards only, and that's just not the case, but the most sought after, and thus expensive, RL cards are the most powerful cards and that creates a conundrum. Wizards could in theory create more powerful cards that wouldn't break the RL, but it would be terrible gameplay. A Tabernacle that wasn't legendary and/or produced mana wouldn't break the RL, but would be an even bigger design mistake than the original.

more replies More replies

Also, [[Doom Whisperer]] is yet another strictly better Mold Demon.

more reply More replies
More replies
u/mc-big-papa avatar

Yeah but its not strictly better. The typing needs to he the same. If you have coat of arms with a field of elementals then the new cards sucks compared to it. I know semantics but strictly better is all about semantics.

u/Princessofmind avatar

That's definitely not what strictly better means in a practical sense because every single card could be better than another one if the situation arises, the term would be meaningless

Shock is better than lightning bolt if your opponent has a redirect spell and you are at 3 life, that doesn't means that lightning bolt is not strictly better than shock

More replies
More replies
u/psly4mne avatar
Edited

Yes it's the first card to be strictly better than Thunder Spirit. Not the first card to be strictly better than a RL card on multiple axes ([[Doom Whisperer]] > [[Aku Djinn]] for one).

Doom Whisperer - (G) (SF) (txt)
Aku Djinn - (G) (SF) (txt)

[[cardname]] or [[cardname|SET]] to call

u/DearAngelOfDust avatar

Not in my [[Volrath, the Shapestealer]] deck it isn't!

Volrath, the Shapestealer - (G) (SF) (txt)

[[cardname]] or [[cardname|SET]] to call

u/YabaDabaYeet avatar

How is Djinn better than Whisperer im the volrath deck?

more replies More replies
More replies
More replies
u/burf12345 avatar

Gets countered by [[Spell Snare]], so clearly not strictly better /s

Spell Snare - (G) (SF) (txt)

[[cardname]] or [[cardname|SET]] to call

More replies
u/Brainvillage avatar

strictly better

*Pushes up glasses"

Well actually...

u/mox_goblin avatar

[[Jackal Pup]] [[Ragavan, Nimble Pilferer]]

u/DurangaVoe avatar

Jackal Pup isn't RL though

u/Mr_Versatile123 avatar

You can argue that Ragavan is a legendary and therefore worse in multiples or some shit.

Jackal Pup - (G) (SF) (txt)
Ragavan, Nimble Pilferer - (G) (SF) (txt)

[[cardname]] or [[cardname|SET]] to call

Ragavan is legendary, which is a drawback, and dealing damage to yourself 100% has uses for things like [[Darian, King of Kjeldor]].

Darian, King of Kjeldor - (G) (SF) (txt)

[[cardname]] or [[cardname|SET]] to call

More replies
More replies

It's a Knight rather than an Elemental, so it's not technically a better reprint of an RL card.

[deleted]
[deleted]

Comment deleted by user

u/kami_inu avatar

Nobody is going around saying [[lightning strike]] is strictly better than [[lightning bolt]]

lightning strike - (G) (SF) (txt)
lightning bolt - (G) (SF) (txt)

[[cardname]] or [[cardname|SET]] to call

Of course not.

But also nobody is going around saying that Lightning Bolt is strictly better than Lightning Strike without someone going "well, achktually".

More replies
More replies

Wtf, why is that card so expensive?

Because of the reserved list. It's only been printed in Legends and Wizards has basically guaranteed that they'll never print it again.

Yes, but there are RL cards not that expensive and are actually good cards. I have a copy of [[Deranged Hermit]] which is not that high!

Deranged Hermit - (G) (SF) (txt)

[[cardname]] or [[cardname|SET]] to call

u/CaptainUsopp avatar

For the handful of people that play Old School formats, where you're only allowed cards print before 1995 typically, it does see some play.

More replies
More replies
More replies

Also [[Longbow Archer]] in a way

Longbow Archer - (G) (SF) (txt)

[[cardname]] or [[cardname|SET]] to call

More replies
u/so_zetta_byte avatar

Lmao this was my first thought too

More replies
u/zeta307 avatar

Targeting your own [Flagstones of Trokair] sounds fun in mono-white. Then flicker him later.

That was a thing in legacy DnT, but it also gave up the Cataclysm's in the sideboard information.

[[Flagstones of Trokair]]

You need double brackets

Flagstones of Trokair - (G) (SF) (txt)

[[cardname]] or [[cardname|SET]] to call

More replies

Or [[Razortide Bridge]] in multicolored

Razortide Bridge - (G) (SF) (txt)

[[cardname]] or [[cardname|SET]] to call

More replies

There is a red white modern deck that does a similar thing with [cleansing wildfire] and a indestructible land

u/so_zetta_byte avatar

There was an explorer build for a little while too, and I think something in pioneer. They weren't necessarily great but some decks ran 0-1 basics and it was a meta call to prey on them.

Someone's gotta be the fun police.

Some decks? Most decks, Pioneer/Explorer manabases are extremely greedy becasue there's nothing to punish it

More replies
More replies

Or a darksteel Citadel so you just get the land without losing one.

More replies
u/badspler avatar

This thing looks cracked.

{W}{W} for a Flying First Strike 2/2 is already good.

But having that additional Field of Ruin-esk effect seems bonkers. Flickering it seems good. Makes me wonder if it will be enough to push a D&T style deck up the ranks for modern/legacy.

u/LegnaArix avatar

I'm looking at a D&T in Timeless/Historic. I been wanting to get a legit deck and I'm hoping cards like this might make something happen.

Need Leonin arbiter printed on Arena

u/Ehnby93 avatar

This and new ajani, along with Thalia, spellbinder, esper sentinel, Thalia again, and the humans package, splashing red for monkey, Inti, and bolt is probably a pretty reasonable deck, honestly

u/Ehnby93 avatar

Alternatively, splashing black for bowmasters and hand attack

Black also gives you the human legendary that gives indestructible and hexproof

u/LegnaArix avatar

For historic, [[juggernaut peddler]] is insanely good. Like a better [[tidehollow sculler]]

more reply More replies
More replies
More replies
More replies
u/LectricShock avatar

not to be that guy (I'm sorry), but "-esk" > "-esque." All the best 😃

u/badspler avatar

Sorry, as my name implies I am a bad speller.

u/LectricShock avatar

no way I didn't even notice 😭 that's so funny I love that

More replies
More replies

No doubt mh3 will have a Major impact on the meta but this looks like an amazing card in legacy atm. Many of the decks on top of the meta arent running that many basics. Combine this card with samwise + wasteland loop and the greedy decks are in trouble.

u/badspler avatar

You are right, legacy land bases are pushed to be greedy right now. They are built to 'manage' around being waste landed. But if a D&T style deck is running twice the number of that effect that will punish that greed pretty hard.

Another thing that immediately came to mind how this thing has two relevant creature types. My first (legacy) thought that this is a high quality knight and might pair well with [[Exsanguinator Cavalry]] in some kind of Orzhov shell.

Exsanguinator Cavalry - (G) (SF) (txt)

[[cardname]] or [[cardname|SET]] to call

More replies
More replies
u/wdingo avatar

Might push Stoneforge Sewer a bit. A way to twist your ephemerates into Field/Stone Rains (late game) was kind of one of the areas that deck struggled.

Edited

New legendary puppy also could hard lock an opponent out of the game with this as early as T3 if they have no basics.

u/TateTaylorOH avatar

Please God, I want to play the corgi in competitive.

u/TateTaylorOH avatar

Please God, I want to play teg corgi in competitive.

More replies
u/ColonelError avatar

Modern DnT was a decent tier 2 deck for a while, though bowmasters didn't do it any favors. More ld to pair with Arbiter, on a body, that doesn't die to Wrenn or bow boy...

Maybe Death and Taxes is back on the menu.

More replies

Field of ruin stapled onto a 2/2 flying first striker? Sign me up!

u/therealflyingtoastr avatar

Technically it's a Ghost Quarter, not a Field of Ruin.

But holy crap, stapling that effect onto a body that can be Vial'd in and Ephemerated and doesn't immediately die to fucking Bowmasters is exactly what D&T in Modern could use.

It's way closer to a field of ruin than ghost quarter as it only hits non-basic lands

u/farseekarmageddon avatar

Also this isn't card disadvantage, whereas ghost quarter is (assuming they have basics to get)

u/Total_Hippo_6837 avatar

It is a may ability and not forced, making it closer to ghost quarter in that respect.

u/Golgari1488 avatar

Ghost quarter hits basics, this doesn’t. It’s closer to field of ruin.

more replies More replies
More replies
More replies
u/Total_Hippo_6837 avatar

It's actually not technically either since ghost quarter hits basics and field of ruin forces the search. Both points are relevant

[deleted]
[deleted]

Comment deleted by user

Demolition Field - (G) (SF) (txt)

[[cardname]] or [[cardname|SET]] to call

more replies More replies
More replies
More replies
More replies

RIP [[Knight of the White Orchid]]

Knight of the White Orchid - (G) (SF) (txt)

[[cardname]] or [[cardname|SET]] to call

u/UpSheep10 avatar

I thought there weren't any spirits native to Bant/Alara. The only undead we have seen on that plane were zombies (and maybe some Esper constructs would be undead).

u/imbolcnight avatar

[[Sovereigns of Lost Alara]]

Anyway, Modern Horizons have always occupied a nebulous canon space. 

Sovereigns of Lost Alara - (G) (SF) (txt)

[[cardname]] or [[cardname|SET]] to call

More replies

[[Wall of Reverence]]

[[Sovereigns of Lost Alara]]

Wall of Reverence - (G) (SF) (txt)
Sovereigns of Lost Alara - (G) (SF) (txt)

[[cardname]] or [[cardname|SET]] to call