In the 6-minute video shown below, author Tom Horn explains why Pope Francis might not be the one who fulfills St. Malachy’s 878-year-old prophecy, which foretold specific details of each of the final 112 Popes, concluding with Petrus Romanus, which means Peter the Roman, who will be serving as Pope when Rome is destroyed and God judges His people.
Malachy wrote the following prophecy about the 112th Pope.
“In the final persecution of the Holy Roman Church, there will sit Peter the Roman, who will pasture his sheep in many tribulations, and when these things are finished, the city of seven hills will be destroyed, and the dreadful judge will judge his people. The End.” (see the complete post)
In 2011, Tom Horn accurately predicted the 2012 resignation of Pope Benedict XVI, the 265th Pope. Pope Francis replaced him, taking office on March 13, 2013. Everyone agrees Pope Benedict XVI was the 111th Pope since Malachy’s prophecy. So, Pope Francis appears to be the 112th, the one who must fulfill the prophecy. However, Tom Horn believes Pope Francis is not the one.
“I believe Pope Francis was not canonically elected. I believe some hanky-panky went on in the conclave. In fact, I think that has something to do with why he picked St. Francis of Assisi as his namesake. His real name is Bergoglio, as you know, because Francis of Assisi prophesied about the final Pope and he said he will not be canonically elected. Now that means that he’s a placeholder for reasons that we can’t quite figure out, but I believe he’s either going to be removed from office or he’s going to step down like Benedict did, soon. And the guy that comes up to take his place is actually going to be the real Pope 112 by election, Petrus Romanus.
The people that actually… some of the Cardinals that voted for Pope Francis now want him to step down. They’ve published this. It’s in the news. They want him to step down and they want him to be replaced by the Secretary of State at the Vatican whose name literally means Petrus Romanus, Peter the Roman.”
The Vatican’s current Secretary of State, commonly known as the Cardinal Secretary of State, is Pietro Parolin, shown in the photo above with President Obama. Parolin seems to be a better fit for the title of Peter the Roman than Pope Francis for several reasons.
- First, his real name is Pietro, which is Italian for Petrus (Latin) or Peter (English). I was unable to find the definition of Parolin.
- Second, unlike Pope Francis, who is a native of Argentina, Parolin is a native of Italy, which makes him a better fit to be called Peter the Roman.
- Third, Parolin is currently 62 years old, 18 years younger than Pope Francis which makes him more likely to live long enough to fulfill St. Malachy’s prophecy of being in office during the destruction of Rome. At age 80, it seems like a stretch for Pope Francis to live long enough to fulfill the prophecies.
If Tom Horn is correct about Pope Francis being replaced by Pietro Parolin, and if the final Pope is the second beast identified in Revelation 13, also known as the False Prophet, then it would appear Pope Francis has only been preparing the way for the one who comes after him, which fits two prophecies I posted two years ago. The first one is from Brian Carn:
“Pope Francis will have a health scare, but he will be fine. Pope Francis is being maligned, but he is not the one to worry about…it’s the next Pope that comes into office who will do very dark things. Be very prayerful about this.” (see the complete post)
The second one is from Pastor Benjamin Faircloth of Ignited Church in Lavonia, GA:
“Pope Francis will die and his successor will make way for the rising and appearance of the antichrist and his unholy spirit that shall increase and manifest throughout the earth. I do not know if this is a literal death or him resigning as Pope. I do know out of his own mouth he said he had 2-3 years left before he goes to the Father’s house.” (see the complete post)
Author
Tom Horn has apparently updated his thoughts on who Petrus Romanus is. In March 2013, I belonged to a discussion group belonging to Tom Horn when Jorge Bergoglio was elected pope. As soon as it was announced that he would take the name Francis I, Tom Horn posted “We nailed it!” Lots of people, like myself, wanted to know how he “nailed it” because the background of Bergoglio and the taking of the name Francis in no way indicates that he was Petrus Romanus. The post was removed within days.
I thought for sure back then that Pietro Parolin would ascend to the papacy because of his background and his name, and he’s only 66, so we shall see. And while I’ve had my eye on him for a while now, my heart and my soul keeps looking upward for our Lord’s return.
Pope Francis is Petrus Romanus. Confirmed in Revelation 17:10; confirmed in the Prophecies of the Popes; Confirmed in the Henoch Prophecies http://www.futureofmankind.co.uk/Billy_Meier/Contact_Report_215
Pietro Parolin is currently Vatican Secretary of State and a likely candidate to become Pope someday. His name is the Italian translation of Peter and unlike Pope Francis, Pietro is a native Italian, making him a perfect match to become Peter the Roman, Petrus Romanus. Tom Horn wrote a large book on this topic with the same title and I think makes a great case. Also, Pope Francis is currently 83 years old so to me it seems unlikely he is the final pope. I don’t see the fulfillment of Revelation 13 until the 2040’s at the earliest, which would make him at least 103 years old.
April 2019 and Francis is still going strong, so we shall see. Although a few other things still need to happen, so perhaps Francis will continue as a placeholder while those things are being fulfilled – Tarshish needs to break away from Rome/EU in order to oppose the army that invades Israel before the war (still set for 29/03/19 despite all the chaos), ties need to strengthen a bit more between the nations that will jointly attack Israel, and they need to continue to stir up anger between the different groups in western nations to ensure they are too busy dealing with internal issues to be much of a threat when they finally make their move (hence the white vs islamic terrorist attacks now taking place).
I have read articles, Bible codes. by Johnathan Wright Jared K. Trumps son in law in the AC. he the 1 behind the that is working with prime minster N in Isarel
of 2 state there. Jared name shows up in the codes
my understanding is the way Pope Francis has named himself stands for Peter the roman. That how Tom Horn explain it on a ute video
I could be wronge I dont think. so or it was cris Putin tom Horn co author
Tom Horn has identified another man, Pietro Parolin, who will eventually replace Pope Francis. He is currently the Vatican’s Cardinal Secretary of State. His name Pietro is Italian for Peter. He is literally Peter the Roman, the one identified by St. Malachy. He is about 18 years younger than Pope Francis. Tom Horn believes he is far more evil. You can read more about him here:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pietro_Parolin
Mr. Bailey (or others reading this), I am being pressed by some to show them where Dr. Horn predicted in print, prior to the event, that Pope Benedict XVI would resign; and also that the real date of his resignation was in 2012 and not 2013. If you would provide me with references for these two, it would be very helpful. Thank you so much and the best to you.
I think it can be found in his book, Petrus Romanus, but I don’t own the book so I cannot confirm that and don’t have the details.
I hope it all just ends soon
Hi James
Of interest. https://www.spectator.co.uk/2017/03/the-plot-against-the-pope/
The Secretary of State for the Vatican, Pietro Parolin’s coat of arms has the phrase “quis non separabit a caritate Christi? “What will separate us from the love of Christ?”
Thanks for sharing Peg. He is the one Tom Horn believes will replace Pope Francis as the legitimate, canonically elected, 112th Pope, fulfilling St. Malachy’s prophecy of the final pope.
Google gave me the wrong translation on Pietro Parolin’s coat of arms.I found out it is from Romans 8:35 “WHO shall separate us from the love of Christ?
Caught the 333 in the numbers. —luminati.!!!
Do not overlook Canon Law which refers to Papal resignation. Pope Benedict did not meet the points and therefor is STILL the true Pope. not Francis. So the prophecy is still effectual.
Tom Horn moved the goal posts. He previously clearly stated with vigor that Pope Francis was ‘Petrus Romanus’ … and now that it’s obvious that he was wrong, he’s changed what he’s predicting. False prophets do that all the time.
It does look like he changed his message, but he has never claimed to be prophesying. He’s just a researcher who analyzes history and attempts to draw conclusions. It’s hard to fault him for not knowing everything and unfair to label him a false prophet.
On the contrary: Catholic prophecy indicates approximately three or more popes to come, with one being an anti-pope shortly to come.
‘There will be a disputed election (Pope JPII changed the election process). If no majority vote after several ballots, the vote goes to 51% only needed. This begs a disputed election. Prophecy indicates a disputed election, the real Pope ascends the throne, but the other disputes the results. Two angels appear to the newly elected Pope, giving him orders and direction from God – Vatican II and all its aftermath is excommunicated, including possibly the popes since then for there destruction of the faith. “The Book of Destiny – by Fr. Krammer”
The whole Church is returned to its former disciplines, doctrines, and laws, all that the Vatican II did in its attempt to destroy the faith is condemned. The Tridentine Mass is completely returned. Then Satan is told his time is up (Prophecy and vision of Pope Leo XIII), Satan then screams “so be it – war”.
The pope has to flee Rome as WWIII starts, he is then found and martyred – (Prophecy and vision of Pope Pius X), and an anti-pope ascends the throne of Peter for one year, followed no pope for a few years of WWIII.
The “Three Days Darkness”, (from the prophecies of many saints and mystics, such as St. Padre Pio, Blessed Catherine Emmerich, Marie-Julie Jahenny, Blessed Anna Maria, etc, etc), brings an end to WWII, during which over 80% of the world dies in the path of WWIII accompanied by apocalyptic tidal waves and earthquakes, during which time the whole world is purified by the “Three Days Darkness”
Following WW3, comes unprecedented peace and prosperity for the whole world, the Peace of Our Lady for possibly a thousand years, then comes the anti-Christ. Happy the few who will survive. All those who are enemies of God, His Church and our countries will be annihilated, including all those “within both the Church and world who have conspired against God and His Laws.
Over 100 Catholic prophecies, having full Church approval in the past, warn of the massive surprise attack of Russia on all of the West, of the attack on the US by Russia and China allied with several other countries including Mexico, and several S. American countries, all following three or four months of civil war in America and Europe.
The saints and mystics have warned of what is shortly to come – Blessed Anna Catherine Emmerich, Mariel-Julie Jahenny, St. Padre Pio, St. Hildegard, Blessed Camora, and so many others describe the coming events. Marie-Julie Jahanney (1850-1941) whom Our Lord showed WWI, WWII and WWIII in detail, explains how the Russian attack all of Europe with Islam. And so much more.
However when all is over, when near 80% or more of the world is dead, comes the great peace of Our Lady, a saintly Pope is elected who performs many miracles, and only one Christian faith remains in the world – The One Holy Apostolic Roman Catholic Church.
So, anyone who has spent time reading the dozens of Catholic saints, mystics, stigmatic’s, visionaries, etc, will find that there are a number of popes still to come.
To add to my first note:
1. Sisters Lucia of Fatima said April 7, 1990: Russia will attack Europe and America, however, America will escape the prison camps.
2. Blessed Elena Aiello (1895-1961), Italian mystic and stigmatic – Russia will attack and overrun all of Europe and she will attack America with her secret armies. Whole countries, cities and provinces will be swallowed by massive earthquakes, not one city will be left standing.
3. Pope Pius X – I saw one of my successors, of “like name” fleeing Rome in the aftermath of a Russian attack on Italy and Rome.
4. Marie-Julie Jahenny (1850-1941), French mystic and stigmatic – whom Our Lord showed much of what is to come, including WW3 in detail. Russia attacks in three wedges: 1. Russia attacks and quickly defeats all the Scandinavian countries. 2. Russia attacks through (and possibly with) Germany to France and Spain. 3. Russia attacks through and with Iran to the Balkans, Greece, Turkey and then Italy, defeating all. Both St. Pope Pius X and St. John Bosco warn of this attack on Italy and Rome.
5. In 1984, Pope JPII asked a German mystic what he had seen in his visions to which he replied: I saw the sky black with planes and missiles coming out of Russia towards the West (Europe), and two submarines surfacing on the East and West Coast of America and firing their missiles at the coastal cities.
Literally over 100 Catholic prophecies warning of the “Great Chastisement” to come very shortly. God is going to punish the Church and the world for the great “apostasy” now happening. The saints and mystics explain that for the sins of abortion, homosexuality, contraception, immodesty in dress and actions, pornography, and much more, but mostly for the sin of “apostasy”, of the abandonment of near 2000 years of true faith and doctrine for the worship of man and the earth over God Himself.
Not one government in the whole world is good, that all are corrupt, all, and in this apostasy the majority of Catholics have abandoned the faith and succumbed to either this new “modernist god – of the worship of man and the earth”, and the abandonment of true doctrine and the true Mass.
So, much more, not time here to list all – but rest assured by possibly, possibly next spring all starts: In the late spring a pope will die resulting in a disputed election with WWIII immediately following – the Great Chastisement and cleansing.
Here we go again that this pope is really the one. I have no doubt that this pope or a future pope will have a huge hand in the coming of anti-christ, but let prophecy takes its course.
God has already seen this and acted way before he even created the world. Wishing that certain prophecies happen now will not make them come sooner.
Peter the Roman – need not to be the name or something like that. I guess, how God used Peter His disciple to build His true church, like wise false prophet (pope) will be used to build the false church/ the church of anti-Christ which is about to come in this last days.
Tom Horn owes an apology to those who follow his work. He has said for years now that Pope Francis is the final pope, Petrus Romanus.
Well, Tom?
He’s the final FALSE POPE.
Anyone else confused why T. Horn is double talking? In his book Petrus Romanus, the front cover depicts “The Final Pope is Here”. Perhaps I am not understanding things correctly. I briefly skimmed his well researched book and as far as I can tell he all but states Pope Francis is the last pope. Why all of a sudden is he recanting? Thanks
More to the point is that we are still in the Church Age.
Matthew 24:3 – “…what shall be the sign of thy coming, and of the end of the world?” (age?)
The disciples were asking what would be the sign of the end of the Church Age.
Matthew 24:14, Jesus’ answer – “…then shall the end come.”
Therefore everything Jesus said between 24:3 and 24:14 takes place in the Church Age. He even says in 24:6, “…the end is not yet.”
Jesus himself names this period “the Beginning of Sorrows”.
My point is that we, the Church, have some very difficult times to go through long before the time of the False Prophet/Antichrist.
The Beginning of Sorrows is further described in Revelation 6. In this dreadful time, 1/4 of the earth’s population must die (Revelation 6:8). Great deception, war, famine, disease and persecution of the Church must happen before the harpazo in Revelation 7:9.
Discerning the signs of the times is commendable, even regarding a possible False Prophet. Just keep track of where we are and what is coming. It would be wise to prepare.
Thought I shared this.
http://www.end-times-prophecy.org/secret-history-catholic-church.html
Not sure about the timing on this. I still stand by David Wilkersons prophecy about the Vatican being behind the new “Superchurch” and if its main goal is social justice/social activism I think Pope Francis “the Jesuit” is the man to carry out this task.
I will tell a few things.
First of all I don’t believe in the St Malachy prophecies
Second and about pope Francis: he is an evil man. He is a false prophet, yes. Is he the false prophet of revelation? : no.
He is an argentine, son of romans. He almost be elected pope in the 2005 conclave but he wasn’t to be pope and pleased to be not elected ! and then Benedict XVI assume as a pope. So, if we follow the line of Malachy prophecy pope Francis is the authentical 111th pope. In fact an evil man, enemy of the Son of God, but not the 112th pope, no the FP of Revelations.
pastor Sadhu , Neville Johnson, Nita Johnson all said that pope francis is the false prophet.
Terry Bennett, a proven man of God has also revealed that the Lord has shown him Pope Francis is the false prophet in a couple of messages.
Thanks for sharing that Kristi. Do you have a video link showing Terry Bennett saying that? I’ve heard him share how he saw the Pope, but have never heard him say it was Pope Francis.
Here is the link:
https://soundcloud.com/terrybennettministries/the-warning-of-corinthians
Thanks Kristi.
TB also goes on to say that the Lord showed him the face of false prophet as Pope Francis, and also the face of beast and anti-christ whom we have NOT YET seen. This message is excellent and discusses the greater outpouring of deception with in the soul during these end times. He says that REAL miracles and healings will be performed by the FP and AC, and be from the wrong source. He speaks on guarding against deception and the unleashing of the souls power. This is an excellent message and I encourage all believes to listen to it in fullness. Thanks!
To clarify, he did not mention Pope Francis. He said the Lord showed him the face of the Pope. I’ve heard in his other teachings he specifically said he was not shown his identify, just that he was the Pope. He said he is already here, so he might have been referring to Francis, but since he did not say specifically, I think it is best not to quote him as saying so.
Regarding the antichrist, he did not say no one has yet seen his identity, just that he himself has not yet seen his identity. Since by his own admission the identity of the antichrist has not yet been revealed to him personally, he would have no way of knowing whether or not he is already here or not.
Here is the quote, “It’s coming with deception. The antichrist, the beast, like the false prophet who is already here, is coming with deception and the world is looking, as it is even now and this is what they’re saying, at the Pope, who is the false prophet. I’m not kidding you. I saw his face in 2001 when Gabriel came to me. He showed him to me, as well as the beast, as well as the antichrist, whom I have not seen yet.”
He makes these comments at the 1:49 mark.
Mr. Bailey, In the spirit of transparency, I have re-listened Terry Bennent’s post in his message called The Warning of Corinthians, this can be found on the Messengers of Shiloh website. Please pray for proper discernment, as we are truly in evil and deceptive times. May the Lord grant us all proper understanding of the times in which we live. The text is verbatim what Terry states, and as follows starting at the 1:49.07 mark; “the anti-christ, the beast like the false prophet who’s already here it’s coming with deception. The world is looking like it, is even now and saying, this is what they are saying, of the pope who is the false prophet. I’m not kidding you. I saw his face in 2001 when Gabriel came to me. He showed it to me. (1:49.43) As well as the beast, as well as the anti-christ, who I have not seen yet. This isn’t talking about something future we are living in it. That’s why I am giving the warning the way I’m giving it”. I just wanted to clarify my words from my previous post, please disregard it. Mr. Bailey, Thank you for all your hard work and dedication to bringing the truth to the Body of Christ,
Blessings,
Kristi L.
Thanks Kristi, TB is very clear at 16.35 about the present Pope as the FP. James, I listened to the audio link and TB is very open in that statement about the present Pope as FP. Blessings!
https://soundcloud.com/terrybennettministries/prayer-directive-revised-terry-bennett
Thanks John, but James was referring to the first message I posted.
Kristi
I was able to find another reference to Terry Bennett saying the Current Pope was the False Prophet.
From Messengers of Shiloh, July 3rd 2016 https://soundcloud.com/terrybennettministries/prayer-directive-revised-terry-bennett
At the 16:35 mark, “The Thessalonian passage is extraordinary clear on this, they will believe a lie. That’s why The False Prophet, the Pope tells everybody what they want to hear. But his actions speak way louder than his words. Is that not true, and isn’t it the actions God says is the real fruit of things, not words. I saw that man in 2001 when Gabriel appeared to me for four days. I saw the present Pope. He showed him too me, as the False Prophet. You are not going to convince me he is a good guy. When I was shown in 2001 differently by Gabriel. Some say ‘well is he the False Prophet’? Whatever you want to argue about. If he’s not a false prophet, he’s at least that, a false prophet. I believe him to be The False Prophet. He will, and you will see it soon, he will introduce the world to the anti-christ. He will and this is not far in coming. We’re talking, we’re not talking about the next 20-30 years. No, no, no it’s way sooner than that, way sooner”.
Delusion and un-locking the souls power is Satan’s end-time game. We will see miracles, real working miracles done from the unleashing of the soul. It’s power is real but from the wrong source. Brothers and sisters we must be on guard continuously against the enemies deceptiveness. Our hearts constantly have to be cleansed and repented of, or we will fall victim to deception.
Great job Kristi. His description of “the present Pope” can only be Pope Francis. I am saving this for future reference and adding Terry Bennett to the list of those claiming he is the one. It is significant because if he’s right, the Lord’s return is soon because Pope Francis turns 81 in December.
Thanks Kristi. James have a look at Pope Francis with different heads of states. The picture tell all.
https://twitter.com/casatino/status/867359112211943424/photo/1?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.thewrap.com%2Fsomething-is-wrong-with-this-picture-pope-francis-meets-trump%2F
Thanks Joe. Great photos of two key culprits.
Sorry forgot to add it can be heard at the 1:49.15 mark!
One of my post is missing which I posted few minutes back. I was saying that the Lord Jesus came personally and spoke to Bro. Sadhu about the present Pope and told Bro. Sadhu that the present Pope is the False Prophet according to Revelation chapter 13. St. Malachy also says in his propehcy that the last Pope will lead the Catholic Church during Tribulation which means the last Pope may be a good pope and lead his sheep during this time of trial and tribulation. I believe the present Pope is the False Prophet strongly and he would soon give up his position or removed from his position and he will promote the Antichrist and pave the wave for one world religion and join hands with the Antichrist. Many weak Christians and Catholics in faith will fall into this trap and pay their allegiance to the False Prophet and Antichrist during this period of time.
John S,
I totally agree with you on this as to Sadhu hearing correctly from God.Alot of people speak with eloquence,rationalization,opinions, some with prophetic giftings(mixed with flesh),and then we have the 50/50 CLUB….50% Chance you may get it right…There are not many people around who have been invited into the council of heaven multiple times…of which Sadhu has been to…but there are many voices now…on and on they go….pitiful,pitiful…
Gets old…..
Hence you have the church…..shes a mess,
What a woman!
The Lord knows how to get her clean and ready…
The bride will be slim by the time her gown gets on.
Blessings to you.
He that has ears to hear,let him hear……..
You are absolutely right! We need to pray a lot and fast even often to know the plans and secret counsels of God. He will let us know either directly or through Visions / Dreams. If God is in mercy would speak directly through encounters or visitations than dreams or visions. But my whole life God has been speaking concerning so many things mostly in Dreams or Visions. I still prefer a face to face conversation with our Lord, praying about it. We all need to go to that level in our walk with God like the OT/NT saints who had face to face encounters. If our earthly fathers would love to talk to their children daily and in close proximity and fellowship, why not our heavenly Father? He loves to speak to us and wants that intimate fellowship with us daily even showing Himself to us in a tangible way.
I personally believe there is more to this than meets the eye. Just like the identity of the antichrist cannot be discerned through pure research, I believe the same applies to the identity of the false prophet.
Also, I think it is worthwhile to mention that there are two kingdoms at war. Change of battle plans; repositioning of troops and commanders; and the use of decoys, propaganda, and disinformation are all strategies that can be used against one’s enemy.
While God has been gracious to us in declaring the end result of this war from the beginning, I believe the intricacies of his battle strategy including classified briefings of enemy plans and movements are reserved for those willing to become a part of his war council—that means remaining in close proximity to him and in constant communication with him.
And it is only those who know his battle strategy who will understand his moves on the chess board, which may make no sense to a commoner on the sidelines.
We can’t completely take into account Bro. Brian Carn’s prophecy because earlier he said a Woman will become the US President after Obama. So he may be wrong or got it wrong again. I dont know exactly but we have to pray a lot for the right discernment. Bro. Sadhu has a very strong prayer life and he prays like 6 – 8 hours daily and he has so many visitations and encounters unlike other prophets who dont even spend one hour in personal prayers. So we need to be very cautious and vigilant. Praying to our Lord for my own discernment daily.
Mr. Horn,When are you people going to understand that Pope Francis is not named after St. Francis.Pope. Pope Francis is named after Sir Francis Bacon.
Look at what Pope Francis says and does and you will see he is saying and doing the same thing Sir Francis Bacon said and did centuries ago.
And ironically many believe that Shakespeare was really Sir Francis Bacon. This is just one link.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baconian_theory_of_Shakespeare_authorship
When Pope Francis starts promoting the antichrist and is fired by the Catholic Church then this man will replace him.
I strongly believe that the present Pope is the False Prophet, because I can very much trust Bro. Sadhu on this more than all the these dreams and visions from other sources. Sadhu says Lord Jesus himself appeared to him in 2015 and told him that Pope Francis is the False Prophet according Revelation 13 chapter. The next Pope may be leading the True Catholic during the Triulation period and will be against Antichrist and the False Prophet as per St. Malachy The Antichrist will not get the support of the new pope but the existing Pope Francis. Pope Francis then may have resigned or removed from the Vatican and he will forge an alliance with the Antichrist and many weak Catholics in faith and many weak Christians in faith will completely surrender their allegiance to the fallen Pope(False Prophet) and ANTICHRIST without even knowing what they are doing. It will be very subtle and deceiving.
In my spirit I believe more what Pastor Benjamin Faircloth prophesied.
Keep in mind that this pope is 80 years old, close to 81 now. This man is not very popular either.
Maybe Sadhu saw a future pope, but was confused by this one. Italian popes look the same to me as well.
Any of you familiar with the extensive Bloodline wonder about his genetics from Argentina? Vatican Rat Lines slipped a lot of people should have faced Nuremburg off to South America. And CIA Project Paperclip cleaned up a lot of scuzzballs to help USA. That got Russia torqued off. They did not get some of the top Nazi scientists they wanted WE did…. I have loooooong wondered about him and Catholics openly refer to him as an Anti-Pope,
Interestingly Pope JP II and Ratzinger had their Nazi affiliations. JP II worked for that huge chemical company made stuff for death chambers. I..think….as a young salesman. Ratzinger had dirty hands, too. I have not looked to see if JP II and Ratzinger were of the Merovingian bloodline but the current one IS.
I find myself wondering about his blood type if it is Negative. They keep The Negatives as “inbred as barn cats” FOR A REASON.
And BTW have you researched The Black Pope and Black Nobility? The Black Popes are the REAL power not the dude on St. Peter’s Chair (supposedly.)
BTW the (in)famous Jesuits – Society of Jesus – could NOT be more of an anti-thesis to our Beloved, Adored, Savior, Lord and Master Jesus THE CHRIST our Messiah.
If you want to risk your head exploding read their Oath, often with the worst paragraph (assassination, undermining govts etc going back centuries some sites have that passage marked red. NOT clerics living as Jesus….And to further bring on nausea see how man are Jesuit TRAINED (including Trump, Clinton, Castro, Stalin. Joseph Goebbles. Prescott Bush, Antoin Scala. Not by accident. Same as Rhodes Scholars go to England for more training.
Then Testimony of Jonah site has “famous people who attended Jesuit schools”. (I do not know how to copy/paste on this notepad.) But many familiar names and oaths of secrecy, etc. Lot of evil “hidden in plain site”. And Pope F actually IS a Jesuit. Which does not bode well.
This is a very deep rabbit hole and why Bible admonishes against secret society and traces back to the Pharisees of Jesus’ time who then took over the Church Jesus instituted and Rome was suddenly “The Eternal City” and Jerusalem as the Eternal City was thrown-under-the-bus and instead of apostles the Roman church Went Assassin. (Research Borgia Tribe!)
I never DREAMED I would become a serious historian for past dozen years to connect the dots of Ancient History linking TO our most recent Modern MOMENT.
Blessings GDK,
Here is a very interesting and informative video on the Jesuits for anyone wanting to learn more: https://youtu.be/ypRb8Z3dMRs
A lot of Catholics like myself do not like the Jesuits either. A reason exists why they were kicked out of numerous countries in Europe and South America. Jesuits are the most educated, but more like an evil genius.
Malachi Martin, a former Jesuit, had much to say about them in a negative way.
Amen. I got acquainted with Malichi Martin in 1976 when he appeared on The DONAHUE Show. I ordered his multi-hundred page book that very day and still have it. There i scuttlebutt MM was murdered. Taylor Caldwell who wrote “yuge” novels abouy religion and power and politics (one of my heroines) was likelyn murdered. Head beat in with a hammer.,,,They like to shut up Truth Tellers.
Bankers commit suicide with nail guns, doncha know. Old time Claw Hammer for Taylor, High Speed Tech thingd to “hammer” nails home.
God bless you juanisaac.
Ratzinger most certainly did NOT have “Nazi affiliations.” As with all schoolboys, he was required to participate in the Hitler youth, which he did unwillingly. His father was vehemently opposed to the Nazis from their very early days, to the point where he changed jobs and moved his family to another city in Germany, in order to escape possible Nazi reprisals against them for his loud criticisms.
The future Pope actually ran away from his Hitler youth work, which meant he was liable to be shot as a deserter. He did get caught by older, “real” soldiers, but they saw that his arm was in a sling (because he had injured it) and they sympathetically declared that he was a casualty–so they let him go. All told, the Ratzingers were about as anti-Nazi a family as any German family could have been back then. Benedict’s father sounds like he was a truly great, brave man. This is all well known information about the family, published years ago.
This is great research, James, and makes FAR more sense than the current pope who I never felt really fit the description of Peter, The Roman, in spite of the claims that b/c he is a pope, he is then a “Peter,” of sorts and Roman in that it is the Roman Catholic Church! I always felt then what was the point of even mentioning it if it applies to all popes?! I hope all those who tried to make Francis fit that mold have duly apologized for possible false interpretation and misleading others with it.
BY RACHAEL MUSHALA,
The Lord showed me all this at 3 am morning on Friday 03, April 2015. It’s about the Last pope before the tribulation. The Full names of the current pope are Jose Mario Bergoglio. Then in the 15th century, a certain Prophet St Malachy had a vision of all the 112 popes before the tribulation and they were all accurate. Even up to Benedict who was the 111th Pope. Then St. Malachy prophesied that the Last Pope will be called St Peter the Roman “ Petrus Romanas”. Let me explain how Pope Francis is St Peter the Roman.
His real names are Jose Mario Bergoglio. Mario is the name of a river in Rome. Then Berg means Rock (and we all know that Peter means rock). Both of his parents are from Italy, the Capital city of Rome and so he is Roman. Then he named himself Francis after a certain Pope whose full names were Francis PETER of Asissi also called Peadro in Spanish meaning “Peter”
.Therefore, Pope Francis Is St Peter the Roman. The last Pope before the tribulation!!.
Wow, now that is a seriously good examination. Interesting!
St. Francis of Assisi was never a pope.
Also, St. Francis of Assisi’s given name was Giovanni di Pietro di Bernardone.
Sorry, but real name of Francis is Jorge (not Jose) but yes he is son of romans.
Sadhu sundar specifically quoted that the current pope is the false prophet.
Tom Horn also has stated there is a letter being drafted by the US Cardinals, to the Pope in support of Pres Trump. He also stated there is a move amongst the Bishops to force Pope Francis to resign because of his liberalism
Is anyone else confused by this wording – “…Francis of Assisi prophesied about the final Pope and he said he will not be canonically elected.” If Saint Francis said “the final pope” will not be canonically elected, then why/how does this disqualify Pope Francis (presuming Tom is correct about his ascension to the papacy?
I wondered about that too and we all saw the smoke come out the chimney, as sued to indicate a new pope had been elected by those who are in charge of that. he was canonically elected then! If not, then surely those whose position to do that would have spoken out. No one has ever protested that Francis was not properly elected.
Yes, except…I also remember Father Malachi Martin writing about the overt evil of the Second Conclave (or Second Vatican Council?), and that Pope John Paul II was murdered in the Vatican, so I ascribe no veracity to anything associated with the Vatican.
You obviously mean John Paul I who was pope for just 33 days. That is who Malachi Martin wrote about. John Paul II was shot in 1981 but did not die until 2005.
Not exactly protested, but I remember a few mans that claimed that the renounce of Benedict was not valid, because he committed an “error” in redacting the document .
On the other hand, some people say Francis was the authentical pope elected in 2005, suceding JPll ..but in the conclave Francis pleased to be not elected, then Benedict XVI assumed ..
So if we respect the prophecy of Malachy (I don’t believe in this prophecy) he doesn’t wanted to be elected pope (I am argentine and can confirm that this is true and happened) maybe he is the real 111th pope and not Benedict XVI (an impostor).
He will be suffer anyway a health problem and will survive, standing there for a couple of years, then we will have the next pope (whatever if he will be Peter the Roman or not).
Pope Francis is believed to be an invalid pope because he was NOT ordained traditionally in the Roman Catholic Church, but only as a Jesuit priest with loyalties to the “Black Pope” who really leads the Jesuits and Vatican II church. So not being traditionally ordained would make him invalid and Pope Benedict would still be #111.
Katherine, I had to really think to get your logic, but you make sense. If we take at face value that Tom Horn agrees that Francis of Assisi prophesied that the “final Pope” will not be canonically elected, and that Tom Horn believes that Pope Francis was not canonically elected, then Pope Francis IS the last pope, per Tom Horn’s logic. Tom Horn is an author, maybe with some inside knowledge, but is he a real prophet?
Marcio:
Tom Horn is a brilliant man, and a true man of God. I don’t know that he’s ever claimed to be a prophet. He may be; in these past days ALL His disciples will all walk in the prophetic, whether as teachers, apostles, warriors in His army, or whatever……..man, woman and child, or all ages.
I am not discrediting what Tom has said…I simply don’t understand what he apparently said. Perhaps he misspoke, was mis-quoted, or did not clearly state his position.
I read all Tom’s stuff when Francis became the Pope and he clearly and repeatedly identified him as the”Petros Romanos,” the 112th pope. However the mental convolutions used never really made sense. It was a stretch at best .I suspect he now realizes that himself which is good to hear!
Time will tell
Frankenpope is an antipope. You can’t have 2 popes at the same time and Benedict is still alive, regardless of the “spin” put on it.
There are rumors that Soros and the Clinton cartel had a hand in Benedict’s “resignation” and that Frankenpope is in bed with them. Current version of Operation Gladio.
Satan was enthroned in the Vatican in 1963.
The Church has been in apostasy since Vatican II.
Wasn’t there a recent post by Sadhu Sundar Selvaraj saying that Pope Francis is the false prophet?
I was thinking the same thing.
Yes, he did.
Yes, Grace. There was. However, I don’t believe he said that he must remain pope to fulfill that role (i.e., if he heard correctly).
The prophecy of St. Malachy doesn’t seem to describe the 112th pope as an evil man. My stumbling block is the phrase “pasture his sheep.” If the phrase were instead “devour his sheep,” then perhaps there’d be no room for doubt.
So if the current pope is forced to step down and another one takes his place, both could be fulfilling completely different roles—the former the role of the false prophet and the latter pasturing his sheep in many tribulations.
I don’t think “pasturing his sheep” is a fitting description for the current pope. He seems to be setting up the Lord’s sheep for slaughter, and his acts don’t lend any credence to him being a defender of the Christian faith or the true church at large.
I received a word on September 24: “Watch the Vatican. They will side with the man of sin. Their leader will be the false prophet.”
So is it possible that if the current pope is forced to step down and a new one is appointed in his place, then at a certain point in time, the new pope and some remnant faithful Catholics are driven underground while the evicted pope returns as the head of the Vatican?
Further, when I read about the city of seven hills, I am instantly drawn to Revelation 17:9, 18. Both verses have something to say about the woman with the cryptic name: “Babylon the Great.”
Could the destruction of the woman at the hands of the first beast as described in Revelation 17 be God’s judgment on those who choose to remain at the Vatican instead of going underground as part of the persecuted church?
Perhaps there are faithful Christians at the Vatican and it is them that the current pope is at odds with? So perhaps such a rift in the Vatican is likely?
What about America being Babylon? Well, the scripture does say that Babylon has daughters. And a part of the name of the woman in Revelation 17 is “The Mother of Prostitutes.” So, to me, it seems that if the mother is Babylon, then the daughters are also Babylon.
We all know only in part right now. While it is very much possible to use this partial knowledge to come up with a theory as to how things may play out, the danger lies in losing sight of the fact that this is just theory.
God bless.
While on some regards all that seem plausible, I still can’t see how the A/C would choose a Pope who is so adamantly Pro Life and clearly does not support gay marriage! A kingdom divided….. and so on.
Sujit, so it has been confirmed to you that the Vatican’s leader will be the false prophet and that they will side with the man of sin, who is the Antichrist. The Antichrist arises from this beast of Revelation 17 and is united to the Vatican and False Prophet. This beast has 7 heads and these are 7 hills or mountains on which the woman, Babylon the Great, The Mother of Harlots, sits upon (Revelation 17:9). So you see, the Vatican can’t be the woman, it is part of the beast. The beast has the 7 heads, not the Harlot. The ten horns of the beast hate the woman, eat her flesh, and burn her with fire (Revelation 17:16). The Vatican will not hate, eat, and burn itself. This woman, Babylon the Great, the Harlot, is something else.
God bless you, Marcio.
Thanks for sharing your thoughts. You have a point, and I certainly don’t know how everything fits together. From what I gather from that chapter, the woman in the vision was described to be a great city that had an empire over the kings of the earth.
The woman was not only described to be seated on the beast but also on the seven heads of the beast and on many waters.
There were two descriptions given for the seven heads—seven mountains and seven kings.
The beast was described as an eighth king who was actually one of the seven.
The many waters were described as peoples, multitudes, nations, and languages.
So for a city to be seated on all three, could it mean that the city held sway or ruled over all these?
As regards the Vatican hating, eating, and burning itself (of course, this is all still conjecture), perhaps because the false prophet is aligned more with the beast than with the Vatican that birthed him, after his rise to power, he comes into tacit agreement with the beast that the Vatican’s influence is no longer required?
Perhaps the false prophet considers the Vatican to be no more than a ladder for his rise to power?
Another way to look at this is that in Daniel’s vision of the fourth beast, a little horn came up among the ten horns of the beast and uprooted three existing horns. The little horn did this even though the three existing horns were a part of the beast. So perhaps backstabbing and eliminating those in the kingdom once they are no longer required or useful to the kingdom’s cause is the reason why a city or entity considered to be a part of the beast is destroyed by another part of the beast?
Re “remaining pope to fulfill the role”.. I believe the same will happen with PM Netanyhu. It was prophesied to him that he would see the 3rd temple rebuilt. True, but doesn’t mean he will be PM at that time, just that he will live to see it rebuilt.
James, God bless you for the good work. May He strengthen you to do more exploits
The Lord shown Byron through dreams of things that the “church” is involved with in Decator, AL that he never expected.
Start at Min 16–
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NWafF3gEF18
He is exposing a spirit of Jezebel in the Church in AL.
When I heard Jezebel, I thought of the OT version. Here is a different explaination for the NT Jezebel:Jezebel, in the New Testament, represents the marriage of false doctrine with true Christian doctrine, as exemplified in the Roman church. The church at Thyatira, which represents under the papal church established around 450 A.D. at the fall of the Roman Empire, was commended by the Lord for their many, many works and charitable service. However, He had a big bone to pick with them in the person of Jezebel, as we see in Revelation 2:20. She is given a chance to repent but refuses. Rev 2:21 Likewise, the Thyatirans are advised to repent or be thrown into great tribulation with her.
This is a section of this article. Interesting site:
http://www.elishasoutcasteagles.com/false-religion-jezebel-now-2/
This fits in the timeframe given by many on this site for major events to happen. We are really close. Perhaps this is too obvious, but does Peter the Roman simply mean that he is from Rome? As noted, he is Italian and his name is Peter.
Another question, has anyone verified Malachy’s prophecy? If it is valid, I’m wondering if God is making it that plain that this is THE false prophet.
I must say that picture impacted me. We really need to pray. God bless you all.
I have read a while back about someone examing the prophecy and list of Popes in their respective times and in the natural, very little made sense. He could also not find any spiritual connotations. The overwelming majority of inaccuracies by far outweighed the few possibles.
I am sure with a little bit of searching, you should be able to find it.
It would have been neat if it was consistently true but alas.
But must say I do believe a head of the Vatican to be the False Prophet. There is just too much evidence pointing that way.
The symbolism of a woman has always to do with Church, in this case a false church.
The colours of the Pope: red and purple.
The woman was arrayed in purple and scarlet,
Rev 17:4
In Johns’ day, Rome was the Capital of the world, ruling over everybody.
And the woman whom you saw is that great city which reigns over the kings of the earth.”
Revelation 17:18 NKJV
The actual color of the pope and the Catholic Church is white and yellow.
Rome was the pagan capitol of the pagan Roman Empire. The hey day of the Catholic Church was the Middle Ages. And even then all the governments in Europe had two spheres of influence: the religious and the secular. Which means that power was shared and not a monopoly by the Church. So no, Rome did not rule the world. In fact, the kings of France at one time or another chose who was to be pope. One can see it in the Avignon Papacy. The Holy Roman Emperor and the Pope were at logger heads for a long time as to who had the right to appoint local bishops. It is called the Investiture Controversy. An all power papacy ruling the world would not have to go through all this stuff if they really ruled the world.
Dont think we are talking about the same thing here. The spiritual always rules over the physical world and the city which will have the spiritual say (from false church point of view) was shown to John as that great city which in his time was Rome.
Why the woman has been described as a city has to do with a religious counterfeit as the real church is described as a woman so which city today has the most religious connotation to it? Is it not Rome? Couldnt be Jerusalem because in Johns time it was seen as an unruly outpost by the powers that were.
As to the colors: http://amazingdiscoveries.org/S-deception_end-time_Babylon_purple_riches
Rome is certainly a possibility and we should keep an eye out for what comes from there. But if you remember, John was told to look where the whore of Babylon is located: Revelation 17:3 “So he carried me away in the spirit into the wilderness: and I saw a woman sit upon a scarlet coloured beast, full of names of blasphemy, having seven heads and ten horns.” Last time I checked the wilderness in that part of the world is the desert of Arabia. Rome is not a wilderness or a desert. If you keep your eyes out on both places, I am sure you will be diligent.
Revelation is about imagery, talking about woman, beasts etc so the wilderness mentioned in that same chapter would symbolize a place of Godlessness.
When then refering to a physical place, Rev 17:18 says it was not a city but that city
And the woman which thou sawest is that great city, which reigneth over the kings of the earth.
Rev17:18 KJV
The word ‘that’ indicates a knowing as opposed to ‘a’ city that is not known. Which city has been known by John and by us as a religious centre? Which city had ruled over kings for centuries?
Cant be Jerusalem because it was a wasteland before the Balfour Declaration.
That leaves Rome only. The city that house the Catholic religion and responsible for 70 odd million Protestants which sounds very much like Rev 17:6
And I saw the woman drunken with the blood of the saints, and with the blood of the martyrs of Jesus: and when I saw her, I wondered with great admiration.
Rev 17:6 KJV
I have come to realize that some things are only acquired after having a revelation which mostly wont happen overnight but through a series of interlinking truths.
Eph 1:17
Diligence is only the start of that process.
Interesting that Parolin was born in a town called Schiavon. The root word being “schiavo” when translated to English means “slave.”
The town’s patron saint is named Isadore, which means “Gift of Isis.” Isis with baby Horus on her lap was what Catholicism used as inspiration of statues of Mary holding the infant Jesus. In a recent conference, Bro. Sadhu Sundar Selvaraj makes the connection between the worship of a god named ashtaroth and Mary whom Catholics revere.
https://youtu.be/WPNsTYahW5g?t=38m23s
No, I am not attacking Catholics as I was one for 25 years until I got saved. I ask those true believers of Jesus to wake up and not be deceived by anything contrary to God’s Holy Word. I pray daily that my own family wake up out of their religious slumber and find salvation before it is too late.
Sometimes the truth can perhaps seem like attacking when it is not. My own writing a case in point. 50 years ago I moved to an intensely Catholic area. Got along well then and now. So I see/hear things. Finger on the pulse. Many are leaving, some mumbling about the day of going underground in home. One guy connected to church hierarchy and knowing a lot of archbishops due to his father’s career validated (with insider stories) how Pope JP I was murdered. Follow the money, BCCI, Vatican Bank, Alfo Moro. There are more and more thinkers in pews and on kneelers.
St Peter did NOT roost in Rome. He went to Great Britain. When he went back to Rome to see PAUL is when he was murdered. I have a lot of Jewish friends and Bris is the Hebrew word for male circumcision and “Brit” for circumcision of the Heart. Great Britain? Tremendous revival first Century. Infuriated Rome… and away it went with Celts Druids, etc etc.
There is a reason WHY the Vatican hides stuff away in the basement and the Smithsonian does, too!
Great Britain no longer exists–it was replaced by the United Kingdom around the time of the War Between the States here in America. The Antiochians claim that St Peter never went to Rome but was martyred in Antioch. But whether Peter or Linus, the Popes of Rome, like those of Alexandria, and the Patriarchs of Antioch, were originally Orthodox. The Catholic Church came into being in AD 800.
A mother with child is a universal thing. The Egyptians also believed that one of their gods, Osiris, died and resurrected. It does not take anything away from the real resurrection of Christ. The Zoroastrians believed in angels before they were described in the bible. Does not mean that angels are a pagan invention. The Babylonian Epic of Gilgamesh is an older text describing a universal flood put into writing way before the Genesis one was written. Because things are similar does not mean they are the same or that they have sinister origins.
Early (Orthodox) Christians considered all these as prophesies of Christ, the Theotokos, etc.
*Pope Francis does talk… I have to go sleep. 🙂
One thing about the 112th pope prophecy that seems odd as that pope being the False Prophet is that he will “pasture his sheep in many tribulations.” That doesn’t sound evil. On the other hand, the current pope took his title from Francis of Assisi, whose real name was Giovanni di Pietro di Bernardone. So there is the Peter. It’s a little confusing, though Pope Francis does talks like an outlying apostate of apostate popes.
Hi, Interesting thought Marcio, this phrase can be read with opposing meanings; “pasture his sheep in many tribulations.” ~ Could be translated as ~ ‘ will place those in his care through much dangerous affliction or many difficult & harsh trials’ or it could be read as ‘will take good care of those placed in his charge as they face many tribulations’.