Joined Jan 2024
1,938 Posts | 1,823+
no
don't know why I said this, I'm just pulling sh*t out of my a*sHe was more of a strategic commander
don't know why I said this, I'm just pulling sh*t out of my a*sHe was more of a strategic commander
is there enough to do one for Carl Gustav Rehnskiöld?Military career of Magnus Stenbock
Great Northern War
•action against the Russians
•raid towards Gdov(-)
•capture of Vilnius
•capture of Kraków
•action against the Danes in the forests of Hästveda
•Battle of Helsinborg
•Battle of Gadebusch
•action against Russian forces(-)
•Surrender at Tönning(X)
Total Engagements:9
victories:6
defeats:1
Indecisive:2
Win rate:66.67%
Yeah, he probably should take the credit for some of Charles' victories as well.is there enough to do one for Carl Gustav Rehnskiöld?
and the defeat at Poltava?Yeah, he probably should take the credit for some of Charles' victories as well.
It's on Rehnskiöld and Lewenhaupt(who also deserves a tally).and the defeat at Poltava?
Yep! You also see this during the Chu-Han Contention, the wars of Han Wudi, and the Three Kingdoms Period.Something interesting to note about the Later Qin campaign, he split his generals intro several corps/armies, like Napoleon or Genghis; and directed them, firstly, to different objects, and then concentrating them against a second, shared, objective, such as Chang'an or Luoyang. He also used combined arms (army and navy) extensively to out-manoeuvre his opponents, and to better supply his troops (don't know if this is common to Chinese warfare, just thought I'd highlight it).
This was also Ming standard practice.Yep! You also see this during the Chu-Han Contention, the wars of Han Wudi, and the Three Kingdoms Period.