What did we learn from Virgin Atlantic's 'Flight100' trial?

Maximise your Avios, air miles and hotel points

What did we learn from Virgin Atlantic’s 100% sustainable aviation fuel ‘Flight100’ experiment?

Links on Head for Points may support the site by paying a commission.  See here for all partner links.

On Wednesday, Virgin Atlantic published the scientific findings from the innovative ‘Flight100’ SAF test flight it operated in November last year.

You may recall that I was one of just over 100 ‘industry observers’ to join the flight, which became the first transatlantic flight on a commercial aircraft to operate with 100% sustainable aviation fuels.

It marked an important end to testing by Virgin Atlantic and its partners, including Boeing and Rolls-Royce, which subjected the aircraft’s engines to many hours of testing before Virgin’s Flight100 ever took off.

Virgin Atlantic's 100% sustainable aviation fuel 'Flight100'

The challenge was partly funded by the Department of Transport which put up £1 million, matched by Virgin Atlantic. The goal was to validate assumptions and predictions with an end-to-end flight test.

The results are in

Over the past six months, Virgin Atlantic has been working together with it’s consortium partners, including the University of Sheffield and Imperial College, to process the data collected.

On Tuesday night I was invited to an event hosted by Sir Lindsay Hoyle at Speaker’s House in Parliament to find out more.

Here are the headline results:

  • Overall, the flight saved 95 tonnes of CO2, a 64% reduction in emissions across the entire flight
  • The sustainable aviation fuel used by the flight had a 1% improvement in energy density over regular jet fuel, reducing overall fuel burn by 350kg
  • There was a 40% reduction in particulate emissions such as sulphur and nitrogen oxides, as well as reduced contrail formation
Virgin Atlantic's 100% sustainable aviation fuel 'Flight100'

What this means for the future

One key feature of Flight100 is that it required no modifications to the aircraft, engines or any other aspect of flight. It was treated as a normal, commercial operation and held to all the same safety standards. The only difference was that the fuel used came from waste sources rather than virgin fossil fuels.

The results above prove that sustainable aviation fuel is at least equivelant to fossil-derived jet fuels. In many cases it is superior, offering a cleaner burn and the associated efficiencies.

For now the maximum volume of SAF that can be used on commercial flights remains at 50%, but Flight100 proves this is just a regulatory limit. There are no reasons why this cannot be increased in the future.

Of course the biggest obstacle to widespread SAF adoption remains production: total global volumes are around 1%, falling short of the 10% the UK Government is likely to mandate by 2030. UK production will need to scale up c.100 times from where it is now to meet that target.

Virgin Atlantic used the event to double down on calls for further support for SAF production, saying “We must now see urgent action from Government, oil majors and private capital to invest in the production capacity needed to deliver a thriving UK SAF industry.”

You can read the full report online here.

Comments (36)

  • AJA says:

    I am curious about this statement: “Overall, the flight saved 95 tonnes of CO2, a 64% reduction in emissions across the entire flight”
    I think this must be taking into account the CO2 emissions that arise from the production of oil. I also wonder how much CO2 would actually be saved by an aircraft that has a hold full of luggage and cargo and a cabin with more than 100 passengers.

    I am not saying there are no gains to get made but I do wonder if that headline figure is truly sustainable.

    • Andy says:

      If you are curious, page 12 of the report contains more detailed information on how the figure of 64% was derived. The figure does appear to include emissions associated with fuel production. Presumably, the comparative reduction in CO2e emissions between SAF and JET-A1 fuel would be similar regardless of the weight of cargo/number of passengers. In any case, it seems a full 787 flying with SAF would have a lower CO2e footprint than if it wasn’t, which is what this is all about. Well done to Virgin and all involved.

  • AJA says:

    Thanks. My point was that the 64% figure must be the maximum reduction. A full plane using SAF would have a reduction in equivalent CO2 emissions versus a flight operated using conventional avgas but it is highly unlikely to be as much as 64%. I’m wondering what the actual figure would be?

    • Rhys says:

      Note that 64% is overall, not just for dropping in SAF: “The Life Cycle Assessment included passenger journeys to the airport and cargo activities, aircraft fuel burn and the embodied emissions associated with the aircraft manufacturing and end of service.”

    • Andy says:

      Only time will tell. SAF is only one part of the equation used to calculate the CO2e savings of the flight. This forum probably isn’t the place to go into detail, but there are many other factors, not least issues of air traffic management. This flight was effectively ‘fast-tracked’ from LHR to NY, with minimal time taxiing and given an “optimised” flight path routing. There will have to be widespread changes to policy, procedure & expectation (why is my meal on one tray!! No toothbrushes?!! WTF!) as well as increased use of SAF. An interesting time ahead. There have been some positive developments in sustainable aviation; I’m more optimistic that further progress can be made than I was 3 or 4 years ago.

      • Andy says:

        I should add that I enjoy reading these stories on HFP. You’ve done a good job, Rhys. I understand that not everyone does (SAF flights with bonus Avios may be the way forward!)

        • Alex Sm says:

          Yes, I just wanted to say the same – it’s a debate about the future which concerns all of us, rather than ephemeral credit cards and Avios deals 💯

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Please click here to read our data protection policy before submitting your comment

The UK's biggest frequent flyer website uses cookies, which you can block via your browser settings. Continuing implies your consent to this policy. Our privacy policy is here.