The Great Buck Howard (2008) - The Great Buck Howard (2008) - User Reviews - IMDb
The Great Buck Howard (2008) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
53 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Malkovich has rarely been better
Buddy-5110 October 2009
"The Great Buck Howard" is a near-perfect faux biopic that will have you grinning from ear to ear for ninety euphoric minutes. John Malkovich plays the title character, an ego-driven mentalist loosely based on the Amazing Kreskin. We're told that Buck had the moniker "Great" bestowed on him by none other than the late Johnny Carson himself after the magician appeared on the Tonight Show sixty-one times in the heyday of his career. The humorously named Troy Gable (Colin Hanks) is the law student (and narrator of the tale) who takes a pass on a promising career as an attorney to serve as Buck's road manager, a move that causes great consternation for the young man's father, nicely played in a cameo appearance by Colin's real-life dad, Tom Hanks.

Part inveterate con man, part grandiose showman and part purveyor of down home wisdom and folksiness, Buck Howard turns out to be the perfect instructor for a young man eager to become wise in the ways of human nature. Howard is what P.T. Barnum would have been had he been reduced to playing smaller venues, an entertainer par excellence who really knows how to work his audience for ego-gratification and profit - in short, a figure as uniquely American as the lone frontiersman or trailblazing entrepreneur. Howard probably believes only half of what he's selling, but it is that half that keeps him going in the face of declining popularity and ever-dwindling crowds. For Howard is just shy of turning into a has-been when, as if by magic, he finds himself unexpectedly mounting a full court media comeback.

A satirical and affectionate paean to the world of show biz and the bizarre creatures that inhabit it, "The Great Buck Howard" boasts a witty, flavorful script and stylish direction by the multi-talented Sean McGinly. The movie also features a lovely performance by Emily Blunt as a publicist and Troy's potential love interest, while a number of well known celebrities - John Stewart, Regis and Kathy Lee (or is it Kelly?), Conan O'Brien, George Takei and Tom Arnold among them - make brief appearances as themselves.

But it is Malkovich who grabs the material by the horns and runs with it. With his every gesture and facial expression, Malkovich turns the Great Buck Howard into a savvy combination of egotism, bravado, humility and pathos. One minute he's an impossible slave-driver, the next a paternalistic mentor - one minute a clear-eyed pragmatist, the next a dewy-eyed visionary and sentimentalist. It is Malkovich's ability to seamlessly meld all these contradictory traits into an instantly recognizable and utterly lovable character that ultimately makes "The Great Buck Howard" the richly entertaining experience it is.
15 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Enjoyable story about "B" celebs
stuprince8 March 2009
This could be the story about so many "B" level celebrities, and is based on the life story of the "Amazing Kresken," The Great Buck Howard tells us that once you enter the field of entertainment, you might do anything to stay on top.

Buck Howard (played wonderfully cheesy by John Malkovich) is a "mentalist" who was popular on Johnny Carson's "Tonight Show," appearing 61 times. He is a classic 70s Vegas magician, doing fascinating tricks and metal feats of amazement. In all, he is a relic of decades past, entertainment without special effects and he still seems to think he is on top of the entertainment world.

Howard's career has has hit near the bottom, performing in such hotbeds as Bakersfield, CA and Akron, OH in front of partially filled small auditoriums. Still, he see's himself as a big time entertainer that is just not getting the break he needs to get back on top (much of which he blames on Jay Leno), in many ways he is a sad individual and does not get that the only people who enjoy him are almost as sad as him.

The story is told through the eyes of his traveling secretary, played by Colin Hanks, who is, himself, struggling with issues. He is battling his desires to become famous with his fathers (played by his real dad Tom Hanks)wish he become a lawyer. since he has no real talent (other than writing)he is breaking into entertainment the only way he sees possible.

This is a charming film, not something for those looking for action, a major love story (a minor one occurs between Colin and the beautiful Emily Blunt (best known as the 1st assistant in The Devil Wears Prada), or some major personal victory, although in the end, Howard does find what makes him happy.

This is a movie that likely describes the life of many "B" entertainers that are seeking to stay in a limelight that has moved away from them. it is simple and enjoyable.
45 out of 49 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
You think you've failed at life? Buck Howard will show your path
la_fleur30 May 2009
Houdini was once approached by a student who told him, "I know hundreds of card tricks, how many do you know?" Houdini replied, "Five, and I have dedicated my entire life to learning how to entertain an audience with them".

Buck Howard is a dried up celebrity struggling for his last gasp of fame. Almost forty years ago, Johnny Carson gave Buck Howard the title "The Great Buck Howard" and it stuck. Unfortunately, those years have left their mark and Buck is no longer 'Great'. Despite his tired jokes, sappy piano clap-along songs and magic acts he manages to attract small crowds at far-flung venues in the middle of America. The performances are always "One Night Only", as there would never be enough seat-fillers for a second. So what is exactly that keeps him going?

Colin Hanks plays Troy Gable, a law school dropout looking for a detour to finally get the answer to what he is meant to do in life. Will be able to counsel him a unbalanced magician -or mentalist-?

Nicely done, this film is funny and likable. A modern story about life dreams, the fierce entertainment industry, and the sadness that hides behind a bad temperamental person. Every well-known actor that appears in this film,even if they play short cameo roles, plays an important part.

It's quite a gentle, unusual comedy, so morals behind this movie are hard to get. However, this is a good film worth watching and definitely should be shown as an example of outstanding acting from Malkovich to Star Trek actor George Takei.
30 out of 31 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
I Loved This Movie!!!!
J_Trex26 March 2009
This was a very good comedy, well written and acted. The dialog was witty, the plot kept the pace going, and the character development was very good. Buck Howard (John Malkovich) is an "Amazing Kreskin" type magician who hires an assistant named Troy (Colin Hanks)to help him out while on the road, playing small venues in small towns. Troy is a law school dropout who decides to pursue a career in show business, against the wishes of his father (played by Tom Hanks in a brief role). Buck Howard had been a bigger star in the past, playing on Johnny Carson 61 times, but recently had been down on his luck.

Troy tells the story (Nick Carraway like) of Howard's life on the road, his unlikely comeback, and his fall back to earth. Along the way, we are introduced to Valerie, a publicity agent, excellently portrayed by Emily Blunt. Troy and Valerie become romantically involved, which makes Buck jealous, of whom specifically is unclear. Everyone in the movie seems curious as to Buck's sexual orientation: is he gay or not? Nobody knows for sure.

There were numerous cameo appearances by notable celebrities throughout the movie and Steve Zahn put in a hilarious performance as one of Buck's devoted fans.

This was a very funny movie, and I enjoyed it a lot. I'd recommend it to anyone who appreciates a good comedy.
42 out of 50 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Enjoyable
Gordon-1113 June 2009
This film is about a young man who quits law school to become the assistant to a waning mentalist performer.

"The Great Buck Howard" has a unconventional beginning, with coloured subtitles helping to get points across. It is a fun way to start a film, yet the rest of the film has a vastly different tone.The title character Buck Howard is an unpleasant and mean guy, and yet somehow he strikes a chord with the viewers. He makes me sympathise with his misfortunes, and feel sad that his amazing acts get overlooked by the public and the press. I wanted Buck Howard to succeed in his tricks, even though he is unpleasant to work with.

I enjoyed watching "The Great Buck Howard".
20 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Not Great . . .
JohnDeSando3 April 2009
The Great Buck Howard is not a great movie, but it is sometimes a sweet movie. Deliberately pushing the nostalgia button, the film bathes in the lost star power of a once famous "mentalist" Buck Howard (John Malkovich), who best represents the simple days of magicians like the Amazing Kreskin (the inspiration for Buck's character). As with Kreskin, Buck once delighted the late night shows, Vegas venues, and small towns such as Akron, Ohio.

Troy Gable (Colin Hanks) drops out of law school to become a writer (his uninspired voice over narration notwithstanding), but first he becomes Howard's assistant, much to the chagrin of his father (Tom Hanks—yes, that Hanks and that real-life father). Troy gets plenty of material from his boss, a dime-store vaudeville diva who yet displays a self confidence and pride to help the most cynical of us see the need to push on in the face of adversity, not the least of which is becoming passé.

Along the way we might learn a thing or two about professional integrity, true grit, and the possibility of love in all the odd places. Troy seems to learn those lessons although Hanks so underplays it's hard to tell. Director Sean McGinly apparently can't coax anything more than dimpled smiles from Hanks, whose similarity to his dad is both physical and temperamental. "Bland" is another word that comes to mind although I found the younger Hanks more animated on the London stage.

More passionate is publicist Valerie Brennan (Emily Blunt, reminding us of egos in Devil Wears Prada), with whom Troy must work and love. But, hey, even Malkovich underplays for this one, although his aging egotist is still impressive with the actor's patented impatience and theatrical outbursts. It's just that the underwhelming script doesn't allow the principals to rise above clichés, and the framing device of the relationship between narrator and mentalist goes nowhere (As it didn't for Gatsby's Nick either, I suppose).

It's a small world of small town vaudeville, fading but eloquent about talent and the need to be who you really are. Not easy, that.
29 out of 44 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
'That's distilled water. I'm not an iron'.
Chrysanthepop2 September 2011
Inspired by The Amazing Kreskin, Sean McGinly's 'The Great Buck Howard' tells the story of a fading celebrity mentalist and his travelling assistant. Buck still believes he's a star and is willing to do almost anything legal to stay on top. Egocentric he is, he's also very demanding, rude and inconsiderate towards his employees, blaming them for anything that goes wrong. McGinly's storytelling is very impressive. The film opens with Troy narrating his dream of what to become when he grows up while his dad pushes him to study law. He grows up. Quits law school. Decides to be a writer and then meets the mentalist. Right from the moment Troy meets Buck, the film focuses on their journey.

The writing is first rate. There are no forced filler subplots. Characterization, even of the supporting, is brilliant (which is crucial for a character-driven film). There's a very likable quirkiness about it. The humour works very well. The film kept me engaged all the way.

The modest execution is also well done. Cinematography and score are adequate.

John Malkovich is fantastic in the title role. This is a part that suits him to the T and he performs naturally all the way. Colin Hanks is equally superb as Howard's patient travelling assistant. The actor holds his own. Steve Zahn, Debra Monk, Tom Hanks and Adam Scott provide excellent support. Emily Blunt is decent.

'The Great Buck Howard's a delight to watch. Sean McGinly has made this film with heart and it shows.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
"I love this town!"
moviemanMA23 May 2009
What happens to famous people when their popularity dies out? If this intrigues you I would recommend you go sit down and watch The Great Buck Howard. It stars Colin Hanks, John Malkovich, Emily Blunt, and features Tom Hanks in a comedy about just that question.

The beginning of the film almost started off exactly like Orange County, another film starring Colin Hanks. Here he plays Troy, law student who has decided that becoming a lawyer just isn't what he was cut out to do. So he does what every young man decides at some point in his life to do: write. That's about the extent of the comparison to Orange County. The rest of the film is nothing like it (and that's a good thing).

Since writing doesn't quite pay the bills, he finds a job working on the road for the Great Buck Howard, played marvelously by Malkovich. Buck is not a magician but a mentalist. He appeared on the Tonight Show with Johnny Carson 61 times, but since then hasn't done much. He now plays small town theaters across the country.

Hanks doesn't know anything about show business but soon learns that life with Buck can be both rewarding and degrading. After tearing through town after town, Hanks falls into a grove until his father, played by his real father Tom Hanks, catches wind that he left school to work for Buck. He is disappointed to say the least and nearly gets Colin to quit, but Howard manages to keep him on for his secret trick (or as Howard refers to them as "effects") to take place in Cincinnati, Ohio.

It is there we meet Hanks' love interest in PR girl Valerie (Emily Blunt). Buck is paraded around town by a pair of simple folk (Debra Monk and Steve Zahn) who try to make him feel as welcome possible. In doing so they nearly ruin the entire event. The rest of the film follows Buck and Troy as they try to resurrect Buck's career and bring him back to the Tonight Show and eventually Vegas.

This is a cute little film that has a lot of heart. Malkovich puts on a great performance as the aging mentalist, giving the character a much developed personality and history. We can see that years on the road have turned this man into somewhat of a nut job, but he can still put on a great show.

The script doesn't waver. Writer/director Sean McGinly does a fine job for his first big production. There is nothing flashy going on here. Just a basic film with an above average story. That's all I expected from this film. I knew Tom Hanks wouldn't put his name on just anything (he produces the film).

I don't see this film making too much of a splash. There's nothing really here that makes me say "wow!" Malkovich is probably the best part of the film, as well as the story. I wouldn't go out of my way to see it, but I'm glad I got to. I also look forward for more of McGinly's work. It looks like he has a knack for storytelling.
17 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Enjoyable all-ages movie
I just saw this movie at SIFF. It was well-cast and entertaining. Colin Hanks, Adam Scott, and John Malkovich were especially enjoyable to watch. It is a comedy, but it was written and performed in such a way that I cared about the characters. It was funny and interesting so time flew because I was engaged in the plot. It is appropriate and appealing to a wide age range, and I would have felt comfortable going with my grandmother or my 12-year-old cousin. I especially recommend this movie to families or couples who are just getting to know each other because it will give you something to talk about afterward without ever making you feel uncomfortable or embarrassed. It is not action packed but if you enjoyed "Lars and the Real Girl" or "Little Miss Sunshine," you will probably like "The Great Buck Howard."
50 out of 59 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Enjoyable comedy drama based on the career of 'THE AMAZING KRESKIN''
jaybob23 July 2009
Warning: Spoilers
The Amazing Kreskin was a fairly good vaudeville type entertainer,

This film is somewhat based on his career. John Malkovich is Buck Howard,The character is portrays is a vain, egotistical,not very likable person. Malkovich is excellent in the role.

Colin Hanksis his road manager (glorified flunky).He also does a fine job. He is getting better & better with every role. His real life father Tom Hanks, plays his father in 2 short scenes.

Emily Blunt another up & coming actress is featured as a publicist. She as usual is a delight.

Sean McGinly wrote & directed.

The film played the festival circuit in 2008, & had a limited few week run in no more than 50 screens in May 2009.

It was then released to DVD.

Actually it is easy to see why it had such a weak release. I did (I think you will as well) enjoy the movie,It just has something missing.I know I would not want to see the vaudeville act of Buck Howard ( or Kreskin) a second time,that is what may be missing.

Quite a few entertainers have bit cameo roles, Ricky Jay comes over very well in his bit.

Ratings: *** (out of 4)83 points (out of 100) IMDb 7 (out of 10)
7 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
The Great Buck Howard Warning: Spoilers
What a film, tragically low scored on IMDb, I really liked it, enjoyable throughout. Colin Hanks and his father Tom Hanks, when they shared screentime were absolutely brilliant together, as were they apart. John Malkovich was equally brilliant and the best character to play Buck Howard, genius level acting from all invovled!
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
have to disagree with the boring comments
pmcguireumc19 March 2009
I thoroughly enjoyed this film. I am not a huge Malcovich fan. Enjoyed him in "In the line of Fire", but not a whole lot else. He was excellent in this movie though. I would say in fact, that most all of the casting was excellent. Colin Hank was wonderful, very believable.

The film was very clean as well. Almost no foul language, no nudity, even for the obligatory love interest.

Two wonderful plot points (though not a spoiler) - Also, wonderful ongoing tension with George Takai that was neatly addressed in the end. This was nicely done and an interesting possible allusion to Wm Shatner's humorous attempts at singing. Opening credits are hilarious with the "you want to be a lawyer" vignette.

In many ways, one might say Buck Howard's character is a blend of Ed Wood and Wm Shatner. I will be interested to see what other people write in the coming months. Take the time to watch it though. I don't think you will be disappointed.
33 out of 49 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
The Great Buck Howard
Scarecrow-8822 August 2010
Warning: Spoilers
Colin Hanks is a miserable law student who leaves school to find himself, hopefully as a writer, and becomes a mentalist's assistant, following Buck Howard(John Malkovich)on the road as he performs in front of (less than packed)audiences. THE GREAT BUCK HOWARD is such a gem! If you are a Malkovich fan, I imagine this movie will be such a rewarding experience. Malkovich's character is beyond self-absorbed, he definitely carries an esteem for himself as an entertainer, although those around him believes he's a farce. Emily Blunt, what a star, steals her scenes as an agent, Valerie Brennan, who books Howard's press and shows on a weekend series of performances in Cincinnati(where he touts a grand, brand new trick he plans to perform on a large group of people), just not impressed(more like positively annoyed and aggravated with landing such a thud of an assignment)with her boss' client. Hanks' Troy Gable and Valerie hit it off and she offers to find him a gig elsewhere, their weekend love affair blossoming as he ponders leaving Howard. It's really Malkovich's show all the way, with Colin the narrative voice who conveys to us his experiences with such a larger-than-life figure who influenced him for better or worse. The finale, as Howard confirms that the 'money trick' which had continued to wow the crowds wasn't through the use of some ear piece or planted member in the audience, is so awesome a way to close the movie. I'm not sure what inspired Blunt's accent, but it's a hilarious little tidbit she created that just works so well. What is it about Blunt that when she appears on screen, it's love at first sight? Anyway, the movie is over before you know it, and is definitely worthy of discovery if you are a fan of Malkovich. His character's self-centeredness is something to behold and getting an inside view of what it's like to be a fading "star" on the decline, only adored by theaters containing a minuscule number of attendants who still enjoy a good magic trick is really part of what makes this movie both hilarious and poignant, particularly when Howard finds a resurgence in his popularly after reading a not-so-flattering article in Entertainment Weekly which causes him to faint. Tom Hanks has a supporting role as Colin's disapproving father, who just wants what's best for his son, knowing the disadvantages that comes with being an amateur writer in Hollywood(he's not exactly fond of Troy's current job, either). Malkovich's demanding character's personality is a hoot, although, I imagine many will find him a nuisance in how he treats those around him(except the crows themselves). Howard's ego is inflated to a substantial degree, even though places like Wisconsin barely keep a house full. I got a kick out of the eye rolling from those in Howard's presence, knowing he's such a cheese, but enduring him anyway.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
One of the best performances this millennium
rlaine8 August 2010
Caught this movie on Viasat Finland without having ever heard of it before. The cast looked interesting enough and it sure was. Sad to see such a good movie go straight to DVD and TV (?).

See this movie for Malkovich, if not for anything else. There are rarely so enjoyable comedic performances, it's over the top, but also very subtle and nuanced. It's right up there with Kevin Klines performance in A Fish Called Wanda. Malkovich makes you hate, love, cheer and pity his character the Great Buck Howard. I'm not the biggest Malkovich fan, but he really hits it here.

Rest of the cast is believable enough with some funny supporting roles, Blunt is always fun to watch. Younger Hanks is a bit wooden and the scenes between him and his dad Tom have a strange tension to them, not sure if it's intentional. You just feel like you should leave the room, and let them sort their business privately.

A truly heart warming movie in a bit of an old fashioned way. And truly one of the best performances I've seen for a while.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
An Insightful and Wonderful Character Study of a Year Gone By
tabuno17 January 2019
4 June 2013. This period piece about an aging stage magician who has seen better days played by the irascible character of John Malkovich and whose story is told with a voice over and stars as his magician assistant as the primary character played by Colin Hanks results in a feel good character drama of the good old days. Not as eccentric a character film as The Fisher King (1991), nor as schizophrenic as The Soloist (2009), it nevertheless has its similar emotive moments of sadness and reflective melancholy as well as a joyfulness. The Great Buck Howard has familiar elements of the story narrative of Stand by Me (1986) as well as its tone and reflectiveness of times gone by and a more lighter version of the character study as found in the period drama film The Cider House Rules (1999) about a medical doctor who rules over an orphanage and whose story is told from the viewpoint of a young man training to be a doctor played by Toby Maguire. At the same time, the more negativistic ambiance of the period of show biz entertainment in The Cooler (2003) is well captured in this movie but with a more ambivalent presentation, at least throughout most of the movie until the end.

While not has cinematically fantastic a period family drama as Hugo (2011) in 3-D that is sweeping in its visually dazzling portrayal of a rediscovered old man of cinematic fame by a orphan boy in Paris, The Great Buck Howard some ways allows John Malkovich more of a full range of the character performance in the moment as the audience gets to live with his extended performances and experiences as does Colin Hank's character. Unlike the epic portrayals of famous people from history as with Amadeus (1984), Gandhi (1982), The Queen (2006), or even The Aviator (2004) with Leonardo De Caprio's Howard Hughs characterization, this movie instead is more down to earth and connected to the human condition, as if we too might have actually been witnessed to such a character at some time in our lives, not some larger than life figure.

Perhaps one is reminded most closely of Anne Hathaway's performance as assistant to the definitely irascible character played by Meryl Streep as fashioner extraordinaire in The Devil Wears Prada (2006). Yet somehow, Malkovich's Buck Howard's character is even more transparent but layered and substantive with a more breadth of personality both loving and terrorizing at the same time. Finally, it wouldn't be complete review without some mention of The Great Gatsby (2013) with Toby Maguire again having his storytelling role reprised. The Great Howard Buck is as plain America, "I love this town!" phrase of Howard Buck as he first visits his next venues as The Great Gatsby is as extravagant, large, and stylistically fantastic as America can be. Sometimes, it's the little things that really count, to discover one's place in the world, and that is what The Great Howard Buck movie seems to be about.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Buckingham Palace reigns mainly because of Sir John Malkovich!
meeza30 May 2010
You think Simon Baker of "The Mentalist" is the real deal? Simon says yes and so do many others. But the real mentalist character on screen is Buck Howard in the movie "The Great Buck Howard". "What the Buck?" you say. Yes, I am not pulling a magic trick on you. Writer-Director Sean McGinly's engaging "The Great Buck Howard" stars Colin Hanks as Troy Gable, a career-confused young man who quits law school and ends up becoming an assistant to a "once famous" mentalist performer named (well… you mentally guessed it) The Great (in his own mind at least) Buck Howard. Speaking of Howard the Buck, he is the marvel of the movie and is portrayed magnificently by the great John Malkovich. Howard used to be somewhat of a celebrity back in the heydays when he appeared in The Tonight Show with Johnny Carson an overrated 61 times. Howard now is struggling to fill in the crowds as he performs in quasi-filled theaters all around the country. His routine includes: a monologue, a "guess the number" trick, a piano set singing the tune "what the word needs love", and the grand finale trick of "finding his performance fee" hidden in the audience. But the best Buck Howard eccentricities are his firm swinging handshake and his shot out of "I love this town" every time he arrives in a different city to perform. Malkovich not only transformed into Buck Howard but embodied Buck Howard. I was saddened to see that the Academy "passed the Buck" by not nominating Malkovich for a Best Actor Oscar last year. Emily Blunt was, to put it bluntly, stellar as a media specialist who is contracted to help revitalize the Buck's career. Debra Monk and Steve Zahn were uproarious in playing a "brother & sister" theatre manager team in Cincinnati who strangely idolize the Buck. And there is this small-time actor named Tom Hanks who lends his Hankserchief thespian act into the picture by portraying Mr. Gable, Troy's dad; who of course in real life Tom happens to be also Colin's dad. Mr. Gable despises the fact that Troy has quit law school to be a Mentalist's assistant; but this young Gable tells Papa Gable "Frankly my dear dad, I don't give a damn". I was not mentally overwhelmed with either of the Hanks performances, but do not think I am playing hanky panky (whatever that means) by criticizing them. Colin still shows much promise in his acting career, and Tom Hanks is still Tom Hanks. McGinly's direction of the film's premise was not a mental challenge for any director to undertake, but I thought his script was a hoot with side-splitting lines. But the biggest find of "The Great Buck Howard" is undoubtedly the actor human being of Malkovich, Malkovich, Malkovich!!! ***** Excellent
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Malkovich at his best
tfmiltz4 June 2016
The movie is painful as to witnessing humility - a man so alone - so full of himself - unable to see himself. When someone asks if Buck has family... "There is no one - just him"

I give this movie EASILY 10 of 10 as to Hanks ? short role- but producer ? 10 of 10 too.

Some GREAT ROLES brought forward here

BEST ACTING

It doesn't get much better here

what a BEAUTIFUL MOMENT

AS SOON as Buck hit the big money

it no longer had meaning

SO MANY COMPLEX messages in this cinematic offering.

I will cherish this film forever

Malkovich - once again-

he really nailed this one

PAINFUL - LOVING - COMPASSIONATE- begetting humility -

what MORE can you ask for ?

Hanks brings out FULL TILT at the end though

BIG money vs ?

JUST PRECIOUS

This movie brings SO many valuable themes to the surface

father to son - that's big - that's humanity

yet? Buck ? vocationally ? to son -

all I can do is give this production 10 of 10 -

and celebrate the final result

John Malkovich is SO good at playing this role - you never ever think Malkovich - you ONLY see Buck.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
gentle reverence
SnoopyStyle4 July 2016
Troy Gable (Colin Hanks) leaves law school which he hated. It was pushed on him by his father (Tom Hanks). He decides to write but he needs a paying job. He starts to work for mentalist Buck Howard (John Malkovich) who is famous for being on The Tonight Show 61 times, the one with Johnny Carson. He shakes hands really vigorously and his big trick is finding his money in the audience at the end of the show. When the cynical road manager Alan Berkman (Adam Scott) leaves, Troy takes over. In Cincinnati, they are joined by media publicist Valerie Brennan (Emily Blunt). A misunderstanding leads to a sudden resurgence.

It has some deeper moments but mostly it's a gentle, reverent view of this Buck Howard character. It could have been darker. Colin Hanks' nice everyman gets into the way of that. He's given a needed jolt when Emily Blunt comes in. She really should have stayed in the movie. It's not logical and the movie misses her when she disappears. Malkovich is something else. He is masterful. The only way better is to get an actor pass his prime and Malkovich is definitely not pass his prime. This is a wonderful homage to the old performers.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
I love this town
nogodnomasters10 February 2018
Warning: Spoilers
Colin Hanks play Troy Gable, a law school drop out. He becomes the road manager for The Great Buck Howard (John Malkovich) a flamboyant washed up mentalist. Buck plays the small towns as Colin hides from Buck his unpopularity. Buck Howard is a caricature of The Amazing Kreskin. Emily Blunt plays a publicist and love interest for Troy. Tom Hanks has a minor role as Troy's father.

The film is rather shallow and predictable. John Malkovich provides us with a quirky character who is questionably gay. Sadly, Colin Hanks lacks charisma and is unable to pull off a great performance. In spite of the short comings Malkovich gives a performance that carries the film.

No f-bombs, sex, nudity. Just good PG fun.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Cheesy
tedg27 July 2009
A performance about performing. A story written by and about a fellow learning how to find the story. The performances here (of the performer) are shown to be cheesy, cheap showmanship — and that's true of the film as well.

The only slightly engaging thing is three moments, each about 15 seconds, where there is a reference to the dark forces as explaining the talent (and somehow insinuating that homosexuality is involved).

There is earnest narration, but all in all, this is just another minor amusement from the Hanks production company. Watching it makes you aware of this. The great Mister Hanks even makes an appearance in a role tailored to allow him to claim this as well beneath him.

The mettle of an actor, I think, can be seen through the projects they make happen because they can. Hanks cannot ever contribute something to a weighty project because he simply has no heft as a being. He is a lot — dare it be said — like the fellow in this project.

Ted's Evaluation -- 1 of 3: You can find something better to do with this part of your life.
4 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Colin Hanks is flat and uninspired in this otherwise decent film.
bruce-27322 July 2009
I think the film would have been great if they cast someone besides Colin Hanks. He is undeniably mediocre in this role. He performance is flat and drab and when I see him perform I can not help but think how much better the scene would be if someone else starred. I don't have a problem with this kid trying to cut his teeth in acting but do we all have to watch him learn to act on film. Seriously does Colin's dad Tom Hanks have to manufacture films just so his kid can have and acting career. I know Hollywood is nothing more than nepotism as a business but when the actor really doesn't cut it it's all the more insulting to the public and shame on the director for not trying to get more out of him.
23 out of 39 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
This would have been a better film without Colin Hanks, but it probably needed him to exist.
MBunge13 July 2011
Warning: Spoilers
This surprisingly respective and almost touching homage to perhaps the last great mentalist of popular culture, The Great Buck Howard is a funny and finely made film for the most part. Those parts that aren't so finely made, however, are a good introduction to some of the perils and pitfalls of filmmaking.

Troy Gable (Colin Hanks) is a young man who flees an unhappy existence in law school and winds up the road manager for the great Buck Howard (John Malkovich), a legendary mentalist. Well, Buck was a legend in the 1960s and 70s when he appeared on The Tonight Show with Johnny Carson 61 times. A couple of decades later, he's been reduced to performing his effects in front of half empty theaters in small towns across the country and Troy becomes the man who makes sure Buck gets picked up at the airport, has brandy in his dressing room and bears the brunt of his displeasure when things don't go exactly the way Buck wants. Along the way, Troy gets to meet and bed a beautiful PR agent (Emily Blunt) and ride along with Buck as the world's spotlight turns back to him for one last time.

About half of the time this movie is about Buck Howard and all of that time is delightful. John Malkovich gives a wonderful performance as a man out of time who is equal parts sincerity, pretense, resentment and resolution. He does what truly great actors do and shows us who Buck Howard is so that we understand him without thinking about it. Buck has a catch phrase he uses in his act and his interaction with the public. It's "I love this town!". Malkovich says it over and over, but the more he says it, the more it starts to mean. At first, he makes it seem like some meaningless shtick. The more he says it, though, you begin to see and hear it as also an expression of the honest joy Buck feels at being able to entertain people. And eventually, Malkovich makes the patented shtick and honest joy blend together in Buck until you can't tell where one stops and the other begins.

Whenever this film is about Buck, whether he's entertaining a crowd or venting his rage at Jay Leno or standing in mute horror at a disruption in his well rehearsed routine, The Great Buck Howard is a lot of fun to watch. Unfortunately, it's only about Buck about half the time. The rest of the time it's about Troy and how he sort of comes of age during his time with Buck. None of that stuff is awful, but it's a thoroughly pedestrian tale and it isn't told all that well. To start with, Troy narrates a good bit of the film and most of the narration is about himself. The script allows Malkovich to show us who Buck is, but it forces Hanks to tell us who Troy is. It doesn't work nearly as well and largely prevents the audience from forming a connection with Troy. And when he isn't narrating, Troy basically just stands around while other people do things. There's really no point in this story when he demonstrates any particular intelligence, talent or aptitude, which makes it all the more absurd when other characters tell Troy the being Buck's road manager is somehow beneath him. There isn't a second in this entire thing when Troy looks like he's qualified or capable of being anything except Buck's road manager. And as far as being a coming of age story, here's what happens. Troy falls ass first into one fascinating job, has a hot chick throw herself at him, gets to tag along as Buck re-ascends to major stardom and then lands ass first in yet another dream job that he has done nothing in the entire movie to either earn or deserve. How exactly is this perpetual and mostly painless wish fulfillment supposed to engage the viewer?

But here's where we learn the unfortunate realities of filmmaking. Writer/director Sean McGinley based this script on his time as road manager for the Amazing Kreskin, a widely popular mentalist of the 1960s and 70s. The character of Troy is clearly a stand-in for McGinley himself. Now, you can't blame McGinley for not recognizing that his part of the script was the weakest thing about it and plenty of screenplays get rewritten. Someone could have take the script and reduced and refashioned the part of Troy until the movie was all about Buck Howard and likely the better for it.

That's where Tom Hanks comes in. He's one of the producers of this film and, I think unquestionably, helped get it made because he saw it as a starring vehicle for his son, Colin. If the part of Troy were smaller, it would no longer be a great role for Colin and Tom Hanks, as nice a guy as he may be, probably wouldn't have had any interest in helping this movie become a reality. So the bottom line is that the worst parts of this movie are the main reasons it got made at all.

But even the worst parts of The Great Buck Howard are still okay and the best parts are marvelous family entertainment…much like The Amazing Kreskin himself. It is definitely worth watching.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
I could see some potential bubbling away in this cauldron, but it's lost in the wash
eminkl18 April 2020
Much more of a Colin Hanks showcase than anything; though it was sneakily billed as a double-act with his father, old man Tom only pops in for about five minutes (literally appearing for a cup of coffee). Late in his schooling, Hanks the Younger discards his father's plans for the future and goes on a quest to find himself, eventually winding up as road manager to a tired, dated, has-been magician with an inferiority complex. John Malkovich is brash and colorful in that role, twisting the bitter old character into something flamboyant, tangible and complicated. Hanks is better than usual, too, and brews up some confusing chemistry with Emily Blunt in a supporting role. Outside of the acting, though, there's very little to praise: the film's tone bounces all over the place in desperate search of a connection. One moment it's quirky and jubilant, the next sappy and melodramatic - no transition. None of the characters really grow, or say anything of value - they just pace through life doing what they've always done, waiting for things to happen to them. Even the visual style floats all over the place, blown about on the director's whimsy like an autumn leaf carried away by the wind. Inoffensive, soft and identity-free, .
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Fairly Boring Movie
thebubblewrapguy22 January 2008
I really don't want to criticize this movie too much. So many people involved in this movie are people that I genuinely like. And I think that's true for nearly all of us; we like great talents like John Malkovich, Emily Blunt, Steve Zahn and Tom Hanks. Good people who have given us great work.

In this case, the real problem is that this is a boring story. I sat through the entire film with my wife and a packed house, and there was much squirming all around. There was something very amateurish about the movie, as far as the direction and writing, and it was terribly predictable. My wife said, "Why would they make this movie? It was so boring!" I wanted to disagree, because I'd give it a three while she gives it a q, but the truth is that this was like watching a bunch of people you like not have a good time.

Malkovich does his best to make his character more interesting than written, as does Emily Blunt who has the misfortune of being thrown in randomly and forced to do things just for the sake of story. Steve Zahn, who is always good, struggles to make his dull material interesting. In the end, they were all fighting against the same problem. This is a simple story with no conflict or tension or drama or comedy that telegraphs itself every step of the way. The characters are underwritten and uninteresting, and we're left with talented actors doing their best with weak material.

I would not recommend seeing this movie, even for free. It's not worth the time you need to invest. And I really wish that I didn't have to say that, because I really wanted to like this movie.
38 out of 80 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
It was biographical! That's why it was boring!
siderite4 February 2010
You try to find all kinds of reasons for wasting time watching a movie that, in the end, you did not like. And one of them is that if the movie was someone who actually existed, then it has reasons to be boring and unpleasant because it cannot veer too much from the truth.

It is, of course, a rationalization with no grounds whatsoever. One you wake up you realize that the movie was just plain uninteresting and maybe its agenda was something else that entertaining you, like for example to give a role to Tom Hanks' son, Colin Hanks. I don't know that, it's pure speculation. Maybe I am just mean spirited because I mustered the time and effort to watch a movie that did not seem so interesting in the first place only to find out that it actually wasn't.

I can't say the people involved did not try their best. The acting was good, the dialogues witty, only the subject was nothing I would have been interested in. And movies about quirky crazy people I've seen so many that I simply can't watch a film just for that reason alone.

Bottom line: you might like it, but my bet is you won't.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed