Abstract
Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a hereditary red cell disorder with clinical manifestations secondary to sickling or crescent-shaped distortion of the red blood cells. Musculoskeletal complications of SCD are often the main causes for acute and chronic morbidities in children with manifestations including osteomyelitis, osteoporosis and osteonecrosis. This article aims to familiarise the paediatric radiologist with appendicular skeletal complications of SCD in the paediatric population and their imaging appearance.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a hereditary red cell disorder with clinical manifestations secondary to sickling and consequent vaso-occlusion. SCD encompasses a group of disorders that occur because of a point mutation in the beta globin gene, resulting in the production of abnormal haemoglobin. Under conditions of hypoxia and dehydration, the abnormal haemoglobin tetramer can polymerise, causing alteration in red cell rheology, activation of local vasoactivity and inflammation leading to vaso-occlusion and haemolysis [1,2,3].
SCD affects approximately 1 in 2,000 live births, and up to 1 in 300 births in some urban areas in the United Kingdom [4]. Previously considered a disease of childhood, now, 99% children born in London are expected to live into adulthood [5]. Musculoskeletal complications of SCD are a significant cause of morbidity in children.
Musculoskeletal complications are a result of abnormal sickling of the red blood cells leading to vaso-occlusion and subsequent ischaemia and infarction. Furthermore, the high red cell turnover in SCD results in conditions promoting the increased production of red blood cells [2]. Haematopoietic marrow hyperplasia and extramedullary haematopoiesis can result in bone expansion and pathologic fractures, augmented by osteoporosis. Dactylitis (Fig. 1), avascular necrosis (AVN), bone infarcts, the premature closure of epiphyseal plates and the halting of long bone growth are sequalae of vaso-occlusion and subsequent ischaemia [2]. There is decreased blood flow through small vessels supplying bones due to vaso-occulsion. This forms zones of ischaemia in which pathogens can invade and replicate, causing infectious sequalae such as septic arthritis and osteomyelitis [1].
Bone and epiphyseal infarctions
Microcapillary obstruction due to abnormally shaped red cells interacting with activated white cells, platelets and endothelium leads to bony infarction in SCD [6]. If this happens in the diaphyses, medullary infarcts occur and if this process takes place in the epiphyses, AVN is seen. The anterior superior portion of the proximal epiphysis of the femur is most severely involved, where maximal weight-bearing forces occur [7]. In SCD, the entire epiphysis of the long bone is involved compared to other conditions in which only the weight-bearing region is affected. Initially, epiphyseal infarcts affect the subchondral region which has minimal collateral circulation. In early disease, the overlying articular cartilage often remains viable due to nutrition from adjacent synovial fluid. As the disease progresses within the subchondral bone, microfractures occur with progressive collapse of necrotic cancellous bone and eventually joint destruction ensues [8].
AVN is uncommon in the first decade of life. Estimates suggest that the prevalence of AVN of the femoral head is up to 12% in patients with SCD under 21 years of age [9, 10]. If left untreated, AVN of the femoral head leads to collapse of the femoral head in 87% of patients within 5 years of diagnosis [11]. Bilateral disease is common and may occur in up to 91% of patients [12].
In SCD, medullary bone infarcts occur with greater frequency than in osteomyelitis, although trying to distinguish both conditions from one another is difficult on imaging [13]. Radiographs are usually normal in the acute stages of medullary infarction; patchy lucency and periosteal reaction develop as the infarction becomes more established (Figs. 2 and 3). As the medullary infarct becomes chronic, sclerosis is seen with a serpiginous border. In epiphyseal infarction, initially the radiographs are normal, but in later stages flattening, subchondral collapse and sclerosis are seen.
Infarction of the small bones of the hands and feet results in a painful dactylitis (Fig. 1) accompanied by leucocytosis and fever, termed “hand-foot” syndrome. Because red marrow does not persist in the hands and feet of older children, this condition is not usually seen in patients beyond 5 years of age. Infarction of epiphyses is very rarely associated with premature fusion and shortened fingers [14]. On radiographs, soft tissue swelling, periosteal new bone formation and a mixed pattern of sclerosis and lucency can be seen. Initial radiographs may be normal although these changes can be present within 10 days from the onset of symptoms. Symptoms can be similar to osteomyelitis or cellulitis, but the symptoms of dactylitis spontaneously resolve within a month [15].
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is of value to define the presence and extent of disease. T1-weighted images show low signal and T2-weighted images demonstrate high signal in the infarcted region, indicative of oedema [1] (Fig. 4).
The use of intravenous contrast may better depict soft tissue changes and peripheral enhancement in the infarction. The classical appearance of a serpiginous double line sign can be seen. This is best depicted on the T2-weighted sequence and represents the junction between the viable and non-viable bone. The inner bright line represents granulation tissue, while the outer serpiginous low signal intensity line corresponds to the adjacent sclerotic bone. As the infarct becomes chronic, reduced signal is demonstrated on both T1- and T2-weighted sequences representing fibrosis and sclerosis (Fig. 5). The prognostic value of MRI is dependent on the size and location of the lesion. Small lesions tend not to collapse, while larger lesions with articular surface involvement are more likely to collapse; Shimizu et al. demonstrated a 74% rate of femoral head collapse; the AVN affected greater than two-thirds of the weight-bearing area [16]. Secondary osteoarthritis can occur with joint space narrowing, subchondral sclerosis and osteophytic change.
Treatment of AVN in children is difficult. If asymptomatic AVN of the femoral head is not treated, up to 95% of cases develop progressive collapse, which has been demonstrated in up to 87% within five years of diagnosis [17].
Non-surgical management of AVN of the femoral head should be the initial approach and consists of pain management, activity modification and ambulatory assistive devices [18]. In addition to conventional radiographic imaging, MRI may be used to assess the severity of femoral head involvement. Non-operative treatments may provide benefit in early stages of disease prior to femoral head articular surface collapse. The use of total hip arthroplasty has increased in popularity for treatment of advanced disease. The primary indication is persistent, intractable hip pain despite optimisation of non-operative management, in a medically fit patient [19].
Osteomyelitis
Osteomyelitis is a potentially serious complication, which occurs in SCD with a rate of up to 13% [20]. This is related to tissue infarction and splenic dysfunction. Splenic dysfunction, including shunting, impaired filtration, deformation and stagnation of red blood cells, begins in infancy. Chronic vaso-occlusion and resultant ischemia lead to functional asplenia and the resultant susceptibility to serious bacterial infection is present early in childhood [21].
Osteomyelitis can affect any bone and can be seen in multiple bones simultaneously. In SCD, osteomyelitis characteristically affects the diaphyses of the long bones with the humeri, tibiae and femora being the most common sites [21] (Fig. 6). In contrast, osteomyelitis is typically seen in a metaphyseal distribution in the general paediatric population. Haematogenous infection is the usual route of transmission and Salmonella sp. is the most common causative organism. Burnett et al. demonstrated a ratio of Salmonella to Staphylococcus aureus aof 2.2:1 as the infective organism [22]. Different strains of Salmonella have been implicated including Salmonella enteritidis, Salmonella typhimurium, Salmonella paratyphi B, Salmonella choleraesuis and Salmonella aureus. Ischaemia and sickling in the mesenteric vessels can lead to infarction and subsequent enteric bacteremia related to gram-negative micro-organisms (Enterobacter, Haemophilus influenza and Escherichia coli). Clinical symptoms include pain, swelling and fever. Clinically, there is increased likelihood of osteomyelitis if the child has swelling affecting a single site, with prolonged pain or fever. C-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) are often elevated [23] and can be correlated with the white blood cell count trend from the time of presentation rather than just considering the absolute white blood cell count. Positive blood cultures can assist in making the diagnosis of osteoarticular infections, with up to 58% of patients reported to be positive [24]. A positive joint or bone sample or positive blood culture would aid the diagnosis; however, a negative blood culture does not exclude osteomyelitis.
Osteomyelitis is often initially investigated with radiographic imaging, though the sensitivity and specificity are low and initial radiographic imaging may be normal in the first 10–14 days of acute osteomyelitis. Gas in the soft tissues, bone lucency, bone destruction and sclerosis can be present in osteomyelitis, but similar changes can be seen in bone infarction [25] (Fig. 7). Ultrasound (US) may be of value in assessing for subperiosteal collections, periosteal elevation and increased vascularity surrounding the periosteum and in the soft tissues. A subperiosteal fluid collection with a thickness of equal to or greater than 4 mm has been reported as a strong predictor of osteomyelitis [3]. If the periosteum is strongly attached, the fluid may be extraperiosteal. US is useful to assess for oedema of the soft tissues, soft tissue abscesses and extension into the adjacent joint. US has a sensitivity of 74% and specificity of 63% in diagnosing osteomyelitis in patients with SCD [26].
Radio-labelled leucocyte scans, which include technetium-99m (Tc-99m)-sulphur colloid, 99mTc-diphosphonate and 99mTc with gallium, can be used, but these are also often inconclusive in distinguishing between bone infarction and osteomyelitis, particularly in the acute stages and may require sequential imaging [27] (Fig. 8).
On MRI, osteomyelitis demonstrates reduced bone marrow signal on T1-weighted sequences and corresponding increased signal on T2-weighted sequences [28]. Contrast-enhanced MRI can demonstrate enhancement of the periosteum and parosteal structures. Rim enhancement has been described in infarcts whereas a more irregular pattern of enhancement has been described in osteomyelitis. Contrast enhancement can be useful to monitor progression of the infection and to assess response to treatment on follow-up imaging. It is important to acknowledge that infarction is much more frequent than bacterial osteomyelitis in SCD [27]. In our experience, no single imaging modality can easily differentiate the two entities. Persistent leucocytosis, fever, significant periosteal elevation, irregular periosteal enhancement, presence of sequestrum and involucrum are indicative of osteomyelitis. In equivocal cases, follow-up imaging can be useful to aid differentiation and the initial imaging acts as a baseline, as typical MRI findings may not be observed in the early phase of the disease.
Chronic osteomyelitis is defined as infection that lasts more than 6 months, and results in necrotic bone (sequestrum), surrounded by pus and a reactive bone sclerosis, called the involucrum [29]. The cortex demonstrates thickening and high signal intensity on MRI. Chronic osteomyelitis can be associated with a sinus tract and cloaca (linear defect in the bone that penetrates the cortex overlying an area of osteomyelitis) which allow for spontaneous drainage of purulent material from the bone to the skin. MRI findings include a linear structure which may contain fluid, granulation tissue or necrotic debris extending from bone or soft tissues to the skin surface, with T1 hypointense signal, hyperintense signal on fluid-sensitive images and post-contrast images demonstrate a “tram-track” pattern of peripheral enhancement [30]. Chronic osteomyelitis with chronic suppuration may develop fistulation and bony sequestrum. This can cause disruption of the growth plate and subsequent growth disturbances [30].
Differentiating bony infarction from osteomyelitis
Differentiating between vaso-occlusive crisis and early osteomyelitis is a diagnostic challenge. Discerning between bony infarction and osteomyelitis on MRI is extremely difficult, due to severe bony infarction having the usual appearances of acute osteomyelitis, namely soft tissue changes, periosteal reaction and patterns of enhancement, and should be interpreted alongside the clinical and biochemical findings [31,32,33]. The cost of MRI, and challenges associated with the use of sedation or general anaesthetic, should also be weighed against the potential diagnostic yield [31].
Important sequences for evaluation include multiplanar T1 and T2-weighted fast-spin echo (FSE) or turbo spin echo (TSE) sequences and short-tau inversion recovery (STIR) or T2-weighted FSE/TSE sequences with fat-suppression (T2-FS). STIR and T2-FS sequences ease the depiction of bone marrow oedema and fluid collections [34].
A further consideration in SCD is epiphyseal growth plate involvement by osteomyelitis which may sometimes only be depicted on gadolinium enhanced T1 sequences and not seen on standard sequences (non-contrast T1, T2, STIR) or other imaging modalities (e.g. radiography, bone scintigraphy). Reduced or complete lack of epiphyseal cartilage enhancement is seen which is indicative of epiphyseal infection [35].
Septic arthritis
Children with SCD are susceptible to joint infection due to sluggish circulation, hyposplenism and reduced bacterial opsonisation. Salmonella sp., Klebsiella pneumoniae, Staphylococcus sp. and Pneumococcus sp. have been implicated as causative organisms. Patients present with bone pain, fever and often have raised ESR and CRP. There is a predilection for large joints with the lower extremities more commonly affected; 40% occur in the hip joint, 25% in the knee joint compared to 20% in the elbow joint and 10% in the shoulder joint [36].
Septic arthritis may occur on a background of other conditions such as osteonecrosis. Early diagnosis, drainage of the joint collection, and the appropriate antibiotic therapy are essential for good functional outcome. Arthrotomy is only used if the joint fluid is too thick to be removed using standard drainage techniques. If left untreated, destruction of the joint ensues. Joint aspiration and fluid culture are often required to determine the causative organism and to adjust the antibiotic regimen. When osteomyelitis develops adjacent to the joint, the infection can spread and involve the joint. This is seen particularly in infection of the proximal femoral metaphysis, which is intra-capsular, with subsequent high risk of destruction of growth structures, femoral head and articular surfaces [36]. In small children, this can have serious implications with development of osteoarthritis of the hip. Once the diagnosis is clinically suspected, US can be used to confirm the presence of effusion and guide percutaneous fluid aspiration for culture. Patients who fail to respond to initial treatment (joint aspiration and antibiotic therapy) may benefit from MRI to assess extent of infection and plan surgical intervention [37].
MRI clearly depicts joint effusions on T2-weighted sequences. Normally the synovium is barely visible; however, this becomes thickened in septic arthritis [32] (Fig. 9). The synovium of a normal joint demonstrates minimal contrast enhancement; however, a hypervascular, inflamed synovium enhances abnormally following contrast administration [32]. Perisynovial oedema related to inflammation of the local vessels is indicative of a septic joint (Fig. 10).
Arthritis
Both inflammatory and non-inflammatory arthropathies are described in association with SCD, with bone infarcts, hyperuricemia and osteoarticular infections being potential contributory factors [37]. It is not clear whether this is a response in the synovium to the adjacent bone destruction or if this is secondary to AVN of the synovium. Imaging features of arthropathy include periarticular osteopenia, joint destruction and bone erosions, which can be detected on imaging [36] (Fig 11).
Limb length discrepancy
Leg length discrepancy is the arithmetic difference between corresponding leg lengths and is classified as mild (<2 cm), moderate (2–5 cm), or severe (>5 cm). Complications of SCD associated with disproportionate leg growth include AVN, septic arthritis, osteomyelitis, bone infarcts and atypical skeletal development. Local ischaemic events secondary to compromised blood supply result in infarction of long bone articular surfaces. Repeated infection involving the growth plate and bone marrow hyperplasia ensue and limb length discrepancy results [38]. True leg length discrepancy due to leg shortening is common in homozygous SCD [38]. Figure 12 shows physeal growth arrest due to disturbance or complete cessation of normal growth of skeletally immature bone at the physeal growth plate.
Red marrow hyperplasia
Red marrow is haematopoietically active and responsible for the creation of cellular contents of blood, whereas yellow marrow is composed of 80% fat [14]. With ageing, conversion of red to yellow marrow occurs symmetrically beginning peripherally. In long bones, conversion begins in the epiphyses followed by the mid diaphyses and then the metaphyses. At maturity, a small amount of red marrow is typically seen in the proximal metaphysis of the long bones [32,33,34].
In red marrow hyperplasia, red marrow cells replace the yellow marrow in a reconversion process due to the elevated haematopoietic demand in SCD. It begins in the proximal metaphysis, followed by the distal metaphysis and then the diaphysis (Fig. 13). The bones of the hands and feet are last to undergo reconversion [39]. Epiphyses may undergo reconversion, but only in extreme cases of demand. Haemolysis leads to chronic medullary hyperplasia, which results in expansion of the marrow spaces, enlargement of the haversian canals and leads to cortical thinning and irregular, diffuse trabeculation. This may affect bone growth in the appendicular skeleton and delayed bone age is seen [39].
Muscle and soft tissue manifestations
Vaso-occlusive episodes involving the muscles, fascia and soft tissues can result in complications such as muscle necrosis, fasciitis, soft tissue haematomas (Figs. 14 and 15) and added superinfection.
Literature related to skeletal muscle involvement in SCD is relatively sparse, maybe because sickle myonecrosis episodes are relatively rare or might be overlooked because the symptoms may be attributed to skeletal pathology [40]. Frequently, soft tissue involvement coexists with bone marrow abnormalities [15]. Vaso-occlusive crisis involving the skeletal muscle may lead to myositis (Fig. 16), muscle infarction and myonecrosis. Painful vaso-occlusion and muscle infarction can cause long-term debilitating sequelae for these patients, with potential muscle atrophy, myofibrosis and contractures [41].
Muscle involvement usually presents with symmetrical proximal muscle swelling, most often of shoulders and thighs (although it can involve any muscle), severe pain (which is disproportionate to the patient's usual crisis pain), warmth and decreased range of motion [41]. The same muscle groups may be repeatedly and symmetrically affected, with episodic muscle and fascial necrosis after periods of spontaneous improvement. Compartment syndrome has been described as a complication of myonecrosis [42]. Another complication is the liquefaction of muscle, which can lead to the development of sterile abscess formation. Levels of laboratory markers of myonecrosis such as creatinine phosphokinase and lactate dehydrogenase might be elevated, although they have been reported as normal in some cases, making the interpretation of laboratory results challenging [41].
On MRI, muscle oedema might be focal or diffuse and appear as abnormal increased signal intensity on inversion recovery and fat-supressed T2-weighted images. Myonecrosis can simulate an abscess clinically and radiologically. MRI demonstrates marked muscle oedema, alteration in muscle size and shape, and gadolinium enhancement around irregular mass-like regions of muscle necrosis [43]. US is particularly valuable in assessing muscle oedema (Fig. 16, Fig 17) and myonecrosis in the paediatric population. On US, muscle fibres become relatively hyperechoic. The fibroadipose septae are distended with inflammatory exudate and appear relatively hypoechoic. The affected muscle increases in diameter and with time, if myonecrosis develops, leads to central necrosis and formation of a hypoechoic fluid collection, which has the potential to become infected and pyomyositis [44] (Fig. 18).
Leg ulcers usually occur over bony prominences as a consequence of venous stasis, which may result in venous thrombosis and hypoxia [15]. On radiographs, they may show associated periosteal reaction [45]. They can be difficult to treat due to the vascular compromise and added infection from commensal organisms commonly present in the skin [46] (Fig. 19, 20).
Conclusion
The musculoskeletal manifestation of SCD is wide and varied and often poses diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. A multidisciplinary approach to the treatment of these conditions is important, with collaboration from radiologists, surgeons, physicians, therapists, microbiologists, among others. Musculoskeletal complications are common causes of morbidity and mortality in SCD. Being familiar with the pathophysiology, clinical presentation and imaging manifestations of SCD is helpful for accurate diagnosis and prompt treatment.
References
Rees DC, Williams TN, Gladwin MT (2010) Sickle-cell disease. Lancet 376(9757):2018–2031
Piel FB, Steinberg MH, Rees DC (2017) Sickle cell disease. N Engl J Med 376(16):1561–1573
Williams TN (2015) Red blood cell variants and malaria: a long story not yet over. Lancet Haematol 2(4):e130–e131
Streetly A, Latinovic R, Henthorn J (2010) Positive screening and carrier results for the England-wide universal newborn sickle cell screening programme by ethnicity and area for 2005-07. J Clin Pathol 63(7):626–629
Wang WC, Ware RE, Miller ST, Iyer RV, Casella JF, Minniti CP, Rana S, Thornburg CD, Rogers ZR, Kalpatthi RV, Barredo JC, Brown RC, Sarnaik SA, Howard TH, Wynn LW, Kutlar A, Armstrong FD, Files BA, Goldsmith JC et al (2011) Hydroxycarbamide in very young children with sickle-cell anaemia: a multicentre, randomised, controlled trial (BABY HUG). Lancet 377(9778):1663–1672
Vercellotti GM, Belcher JD (2014) Not simply misshapen red cells: multimolecular and cellular events in sickle vaso-occlusion. J Clin Invest 124(4):1462–1465
Gupta R, Adekile AD (2004 Jun) MRI follow-up and natural history of avascular necrosis of the femoral head in Kuwaiti children with sickle cell disease. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 26(6):351–353
Steinberg ME, Hayken GD, Steinberg DR (1995 Jan) A quantitative system for staging avascular necrosis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 77(1):34–41
Matos MA, dos Santos Silva LL, Brito Fernandes R, Dias Malheiros C, Pinto da Silva BV (2012) Avascular necrosis of the femoral head in sickle cell disease patients. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil 14(2):155–160
Mahadeo KM, Oyeku S, Taragin B, Rajpathak SN, Moody K, Santizo R, Driscoll MC (2011) Increased prevalence of osteonecrosis of the femoral head in children and adolescents with sickle-cell disease. Am J Hematol 86(9):806–808
Milner PF, Kraus AP, Sebes JI, Sleeper LA, Dukes KA, Embury SH, Bellevue R, Koshy M, Moohr JW, Smith J (1991) Sickle cell disease as a cause of osteonecrosis of the femoral head. N Engl J Med 325(21):1476–1481
Hernigou P, Galacteros F, Bachir D, Goutallier D (1991 Jan) Deformities of the hip in adults who have sickle-cell disease and had avascular necrosis in childhood. A natural history of fifty-two patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 73(1):81–92
Mourad C, Omoumi P, Malghem J, Vande Berg BC (2019 Nov) Conventional radiography of the hip revisited: Correlation with advanced imaging. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 27(4):661–683
Almeida A, Roberts I (2005 May) Bone involvement in sickle cell disease. Br J Haematol 129(4):482–490
Watson RJ, Burko H, Megas H, Robsinson M (1963) The handfoot syndrome in sickle-cell disease in young children. Pediatrics 31:975–982
Shimizu K, Moriya H, Akita T, Sakamoto M, Suguro T (1994) Prediction of collapse with magnetic resonance imaging of avascular necrosis of the femoral head. J Bone Joint Surg Am 76(2):215–223
Hernigou P, Habibi A, Bachir D, Galacteros F (2006) The natural history of asymptomatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head in adults with sickle cell disease. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88(12):2565–2572
Kamath AF, McGraw MH, Israelite CL (2015) Surgical management of osteonecrosis of the femoral head in patients with sickle cell disease. World J Orthop 6(10):776–782
Jeong GK, Ruchelsman DE, Jazrawi LM, Jaffe WL (2005) Total hip arthroplasty in sickle cell hemoglobinopathies. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 13(3):208–217
Bahebeck J, Atangana R, Techa A, Monny-Lobe M, Sosso M, Hoffmeyer P (2004) Relative rates and features of musculoskeletal complications in adult sicklers. Acta Orthop Belg 70(2):107–111
Brown AK, Sleeper LA, Miller ST, Pegelow CH, Gill FM, Waclawiw MA (1994) Reference values and hematologic changes from birth to 5 years in patients with sickle cell disease. Cooperative study of sickle cell disease. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 148(8):796–804
Burnett MW, Bass JW, Cook BA (1998) Etiology of osteomyelitis complicating sickle cell disease. Pediatrics 101(2):296–297
Berger E, Saunders N, Wang L, Friedman JN (2009) Sickle cell disease in children: differentiating osteomyelitis from vaso-occlusive crisis. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 163(3):251–255
Chambers JB, Forsythe DA, Bertrand SL, Iwinski HJ, Steflik DE (2000) Retrospective review of osteoarticular infections in a pediatric sickle cell age group. J Pediatr Orthop 20(5):682–685
Buchanan GR (1996) Differentiation of bone infarct from infection in a child in sickle cell disease. Pediatr Infect Dis J 15(8):725
William RR, Hussein SS, Jeans WD, Wali YA, Lamki ZA (2000) A prospective study of soft-tissue ultrasonography in sickle cell disease patients with suspected osteomyelitis. Clin Radiol 55(4):307–310
Skaggs DL, Kim SK, Greene NW, Harris D, Miller JH (2001) Differentiation between bone infarction and acute osteomyelitis in children with sickle-cell disease with use of sequential radionuclide bone-marrow and bone scans. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83(12):1810–1813
Sachan AA, Lakhkar BN, Lakhkar BB, Sachan S (2015) Is MRI necessary for skeletal evaluation in sickle cell disease. J Clin Diagn Res 9(2):TC08–TC12
Jaramillo D, Dormans JP, Delgado J, Laor T, St Geme JW, 3rd. (2017 Jun) Hematogenous osteomyelitis in infants and children: imaging of a changing disease. Radiology 283(3):629–643
Alaia EF, Chhabra A, Simpfendorfer CS, Cohen M, Mintz DN, Vossen JA, Zoga AC, Fritz J, Spritzer CE, Armstrong DG, Morrison WB (2021) MRI nomenclature for musculoskeletal infection. Skeletal Radiol 50(12):2319–2347 (Erratum in: Skeletal Radiol. 2022 May;51(5):1103-1104)
Fontalis A, Hughes K, Nguyen MP, Williamson M, Yeo A, Lui D, Gelfer Y (2019) The challenge of differentiating vaso-occlusive crises from osteomyelitis in children with sickle cell disease and bone pain: A 15-year retrospective review. J Child Orthop 13(1):33–39
Wong AL, Sakamoto KM, Johnson EE (2001) Differentiating osteomyelitis from bone infarction in sickle cell disease. Pediatr Emerg Care 17(1):60–63 quiz 64
Bonnerot V, Sebag G, de Montalembert M, Wioland M, Glorion C, Girot R, Lallemand D (1994) Gadolinium-DOTA enhanced MRI of painful osseous crises in children with sickle cell anemia. Pediatr Radiol 24(2):92–95
Pugmire BS, Shailam R, Gee MS (2014) Role of MRI in the diagnosis and treatment of osteomyelitis in pediatric patients. World J Radiol 6(8):530–537
Kan JH, Young RS, Yu C, Hernanz-Schulman M (2010) Clinical impact of gadolinium in the MRI diagnosis of musculoskeletal infection in children. Pediatr Radiol 40(7):1197–1205
Guillerman RP (2013 Mar) Osteomyelitis and beyond. Pediatr Radiol 43(Suppl 1):S193–S203
Hernigou P, Daltro G, Flouzat-Lachaniette CH, Roussignol X, Poignard A (2010) Septic arthritis in adults with sickle cell disease often is associated with osteomyelitis or osteonecrosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468(6):1676–1681
Laine JC, Denning JR, Riccio AI, Jo C, Joglar JM, Wimberly RL (2015 Mar) The use of ultrasound in the management of septic arthritis of the hip. J Pediatr Orthop B 24(2):95–98
Ihuarula E (2020) Leg length discrepancies in Nigerian children with sickle cell anaemia. J Adv Med Med Res:70–79
Ejindu VC, Hine AL, Mashayekhi M, Shorvon PJ, Misra RR (2007) Musculoskeletal manifestations of sickle cell disease. Radiographics 27(4):1005–1021
Ravelojaona M, Féasson L, Oyono-Enguéllé S, Vincent L, Djoubairou B, Ewa'Sama Essoue C, Messonnier LA (2015 May) Evidence for a profound remodeling of skeletal muscle and its microvasculature in sickle cell anemia. Am J Pathol 185(5):1448–1456
Valeriano-Marcet J, Kerr LD (1991) Myonecrosis and myofibrosis as complications of sickle cell anemia. Ann Intern Med 115(2):99–101
Mani S, Duffy TP (1993) Sickle myonecrosis revisited. Am J Med 95(5):525–530
Miller ST, Sleeper LA, Pegelow CH et al (2000) Prediction of adverse outcomes in children with sickle cell disease. N Engl J Med 342(2):83–89
van Holsbeeck MT (2007) In: Jacobson JA (ed) Musculoskeletal ultrasound. Elsevier
Madani G, Papadopoulou AM, Holloway B et al (2007) The radiological manifestations of sickle cell disease. Clin Radiol 62(6):528–538
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
S.H. and M.P. conceptualised this article. M.P., V.H., S.H. and J.A. drafted and revised the manuscript. M.P., J.A. and S.H. reviewed the manuscript. All authors approved the final manuscript for submission.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
None
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
De La Hoz Polo, M., Hudson, V.E., Adu, J. et al. The many faces of sickle cell disease in children: complications in the appendicular skeleton. Pediatr Radiol (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-024-05913-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-024-05913-9