Vitalik Buterin says OpenAI’s GPT-4 has passed the Turing test | Buterin’s comments reference new research indicating most humans can no longer tell when they’re talking to a machine. : r/CryptoCurrency Skip to main content

Get the Reddit app

Scan this QR code to download the app now
Or check it out in the app stores
r/CryptoCurrency icon
r/CryptoCurrency icon
Go to CryptoCurrency
r/CryptoCurrency
A banner for the subreddit

The leading community for cryptocurrency news, discussion, and analysis.


Members Online

Vitalik Buterin says OpenAI’s GPT-4 has passed the Turing test | Buterin’s comments reference new research indicating most humans can no longer tell when they’re talking to a machine.

🔴 UNRELIABLE SOURCE
Share
Sort by:
Best
Open comment sort options

Machines didnt get smarter. Humans got... 

Full of lead poisoning.

u/Hot_Significance_256 avatar

more so mercury and aluminum

And microplastics

PFAS

More replies
More replies

Don't forget brain worms.

Iron man

More replies

Got what?

Don't just leave us hanging!!!

For real, I love getting things!

More replies
u/throwaway92715 avatar

DOOOPITERRRR :P :P :D

More replies

HE does not say anything, HE is merely saying what research is saying.

Take him a little bit away from your guys' mental pedestal.

Because article is bad journalism we all worship him?

No?

People here worship him. And this article makes (On facevalue) it seem that HE says it has passed the turing test.

He did not, and he cannot.

So you didn't read the article and now make claims everyone worships him. Jebus.

Not really, no. I claim (and you can easily find the big amount of Vitalik maxis this sub) that the title makes it sound like he confirm turning completion, which these users will gobble up.

In hindsight, it also speaks miles about the quality of this sub, and the type of posts that are allowed.

More replies
More replies
More replies

Well, if it types 100+ wpm I kinda kno

More replies

tldr; Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin has stated that OpenAI's GPT-4 has passed the Turing test, a measure of an AI's ability to mimic human conversation indistinguishably. This assertion is based on research from the University of California San Diego, where a study found that humans mistook GPT-4 for a human 56% of the time in blind tests. Buterin interprets these results as GPT-4 having the capacity to fool humans into thinking it is human, thus passing the Turing test, despite a 12% difference in identification accuracy between humans and the AI.

*This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR.

u/antistupidsociety avatar

Well this comment is ironic

More replies

It's only the beginning

u/Lostmypants69 avatar

Forreal. How fast AI has devloped and evolved over the last 5 years is unbelievable and downright eerie honestly. Think about another 5 years. I vividly remember leaving I Robot after seeing it in theaters thinking about our technology we had in that moment and telling myself it's just a movie..

Right. There's already robots with some impressive motor functions. Technically many households already have robots vacuuming their floors... Honestly we're not too far away from putting chat bots into new household robots that could learn to do all sorts of household chores

More replies
More replies
u/Defender_Of_TheCrown avatar

To be fair with the amount of idiots out there, I can’t tell if I’m talking to a human even when talking to a human.

u/pikkuhillo avatar

I have read few neuroscience books and to me it looks like we are all machines. We are just extremely well coded by nature while our silicon counterparts are currently able to fullfill maximum of few functions properly, but still very unable in comparison. Science just cannot mimic what it does not properly understand. Long way to go.

Agree 100%

Nature spent billions of years randomly growing biological circuit boards with the only parameter being which one could reproduce itself the best.

https://www.damninteresting.com/on-the-origin-of-circuits/

The ultimate seed

More replies
More replies

Yeah I would be talking to it and be like this is off. But then I would be like, well there are some really dumb people out there, this person just is kind of stupid.

Society is NOT ready

"sorry, I'm a program and my parameter don't allow me to give you the recipe for a bomb" Yeah very human 😂

People in this thread downplaying this thinking they are smart enough to tell the difference are hilarious.

Saw an AI generated image of a preschooler last night. One foot looks like a child’s hand. The other has a clusters of 9 toes..

More replies
u/my-man-fred avatar

Most humans IQ have dropped.
Most humans are now dumber.

u/KeepRedditAnonymous avatar
Edited

Weirdly the science says just the opposite, and (given all the Trump voters) I don't understand it one bit.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flynn_effect#Rise_in_IQ

Dumb people are loud.

Social makes them even louder.

But all in all people ARE getting smarter. A 100 IQ is suppose to be the average person. They are making the the tests harder little by little to keep the average results to 100.

I would argue that people are becoming less socially smart though

u/Narrow_Elk6755 avatar

Have you read the elders of Zion?  People weren't geniuses historically.

More replies
u/JungOpen avatar

Trump

How can such a rich man live rent free in so many people's head?

u/KeepRedditAnonymous avatar

I don't know what "rent free" is. My head is not for rent.

In any case, I tend to hate con-men. Trump is a classic con-man, in addition to being a rapist along with all of his other moral failings.

Only dumb people vote for Trump. His largest and most loyal voting block is people who did not graduate from High School.

Trump Voter == Low IQ

More replies
More replies

Oh the irony...

More replies

So we need a new test I suppose.

Whereas when he talks he sounds like a machine.

u/Flegmanuachi avatar

Yeah meanwhile I can’t get copilot to keep the train of through for more than two fucking replies. I ask it for a simple image to text ( img was just code) and it just invents shit.

Yea I call bullshit. By function of how these language models work they won't pass a real turing test unless specifically conditioned for it.

Edited

GPT-4 has passed the Turing test

It hasn't.

We evaluated GPT-4 in a public online Turing test. The best-performing GPT-4 prompt passed in 49.7% of games, outperforming ELIZA (22%) and GPT-3.5 (20%), but falling short of the baseline set by human participants (66%). Participants' decisions were based mainly on linguistic style (35%) and socioemotional traits (27%), supporting the idea that intelligence, narrowly conceived, is not sufficient to pass the Turing test.

https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.20216

You can't pass the Turing test with ANI ... the fuck are people talking about? AGI was not achieved yet.

u/coyoteka avatar

What does it mean if humans can't prove they're not AI?

Who cares what he says?

Lol I just ask it what a woman is.

Then I'll know if it's a human or a machine (or a human imitating a machine).

Turing test is outdated anyways and doesn't mean much.

ITT : Turning test is meaningless, tells us nothing, and it didn’t actually pass it

u/Distinct-Thanks-6477 avatar

I think AI is an unstoppable force long-term. It will only get better as time goes on. There are several implementations improving the technology. For instance, Rivalz AI is the first AI Intel Layer, providing a network of secure and efficient infrastructure for storing, processing, and validating AI data, enabling a modular ecosystem of AI apps.

It's scary that GPT-4 might have passed the Turing test, but does it truly understand the conversation? If GPT-4 can mimic human conversation so well, it raises interesting questions about AI data ownership. Some projects(Rivalz Network) which focus on personal data provenance, could become even more crucial. Users can track their data used to train AI models and potentially receive compensation for it. This is a whole new layer of data control we might need in the age of advanced AI.

Imagine AI models needing verifiable training data to demonstrate responsible use of user information. Some projects could provide a framework for ensuring ethical AI development.

u/GiverTakerMaker avatar

Most humans are stupid.

If true, this is not a big deal. Intelligence is not sentience.

u/xTeamRwbyx avatar

I call bullshit humans just got to dumb to realize they are talking to a machine

Bro I don't care what buterin says about AI he's not the AI dude.