Day 15 of Trump New York hush money trial | CNN Politics

Live Updates

Michael Cohen set to testify at Trump hush money trial Monday

elliot williams vpx
'Setting the stage for Michael Cohen': CNN legal analyst on phone records in Trump trial
00:59 - Source: CNN

What we covered here

Our live coverage has concluded but will resume Monday morning. Scroll through the posts below to read more about what happened Friday.

130 Posts

Takeaways from Day 15 of the Donald Trump hush money trial

Prosecutors say it’s entirely possible they could rest their case by the end of next week. Here are the takeaways from day 15 of the Trump hush money trial:

Cohen is on deck: Donald Trump’s former attorney Michael Cohen is expected to take the stand Monday and testify to his role in negotiating the hush money payment to Stormy Daniels on Trump’s behalf, as well as how he was reimbursed through retainer payments in 2017 that are at the heart of the charges against Trump. However, his testimony comes with baggage. Cohen himself was federally charged with campaign finance violations, tax crimes and lying to Congress in previous testimony. He’s changed his story as he turned from loyal Trump defender to a chief antagonist after pleading guilty to the federal charges in 2018. Cohen’s credibility with the jury may make or break Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s case, so it will be high stakes for the prosecution when Cohen is sworn in.

Judge to Cohen: Please stop talking: Trump attorney Todd Blanche urged Judge Juan Merchan to order Cohen to stop talking about the trial and Trump. Trump is not allowed to talk about Cohen because of the gag order in place. But, Blanche said, Cohen is nevertheless allowed to attack him. Assistant District Attorney Joshua Steinglass responded that prosecutors have repeatedly instructed Cohen and all of the other witnesses in the case not to speak publicly about it. “The fact of the matter is, we have no control over what they do,” he conceded. Merchan has already said he cannot gag witnesses in the case. But he sympathized with Blanche’s position and said that he would “direct the people to communicate to Mr. Cohen that the judge is asking him to refrain from making any more statements” about this case or Trump.

Trump is all smiles at testimony of former White House aide: Trump exchanged smiles with his former White House assistant Madeleine Westerhout, who wrapped up her testimony Friday that began one day prior. She raised her eyebrows and smiled at Trump who smiled back at her and mouthed something as she left the courtroom. Westerhout testified that she remembered Trump was upset after the Daniels story came out in 2018. She testified that Trump signed scores of documents a day while multitasking on the phone or in meetings, and she said she’d seen him signing checks without reviewing them.

Prosecutors introduce key text and call records into evidence: After Westerhout left the stand, prosecutors spent the rest of the day calling custodial witnesses to introduce cell phone records into evidence. It made for a dry day of testimony, but it also provided key evidence that prosecutors plan to use to convince the jury that Trump is guilty of falsifying business records.

Prosecution may rest next week: Steinglass said that prosecutors expect to call two more witnesses, and then rest. “And I think it’s entirely possible we will rest by the end of next week,” he added. When the prosecution rests, it will be Trump’s turn. It’s not clear how long he will put on a case in defense – a question that is likely to rest largely on whether or not Trump himself takes the stand.

Read all the takeaways here.

Here are all the witnesses who have testified so far in the Trump hush money trial

Donald Trump’s longtime assistant, the former banker of Trump’s attorney Michael Cohen and adult film actress Stormy Daniels are among witnesses who have taken the stand so far in the hush money trial.

As of Friday, here’s everybody we’ve heard from so far:

  • David Pecker — the former CEO of American Media Inc., the National Enquirer’s parent company — was the first witness called to testify. After more than 10 hours of testimony across four days, he offered illuminating details into how the infamous tabloid operated and conducted so-called “catch and kill” operations.
  • Rhona Graff, Trump’s longtime assistant at the Trump Organization, was called to testify briefly on April 26.
  • Gary Farro, the former banker of Cohen, walked the jury through Cohen’s bank activity around the payment to Daniels.
  • Keith Davidson, the former lawyer for model and actress Karen McDougal as well as for Daniels, was on the stand for nearly 6 hours over two days.
  • Douglas Daus works for the Manhattan District Attorney’s High Technology Analysis Unit, and was assigned to analyze two iPhones that belonged to Cohen in the investigation related to Trump. They were obtained via a search warrant. Daus testified about the “unusual” amount of contacts and other things he found on Cohen’s phone.
  • Hope Hicks, Trump’s longtime former aide, testified for a little less than three hours about her role as Trump’s 2016 campaign press secretary, the aftermath of the “Access Hollywood” tape release and Cohen’s payment to Daniels.
  • Jeffrey McConney, a former Trump Organization controller, testified about how Cohen’s payments were listed in Trump’s financial documents.
  • Deborah Tarasoff, the accounts payable supervisor in the accounting department at the Trump Organization, explained how checks were cut to Cohen in 2017 and testified that invoices over $10,000 had to be approved by Trump or one of his sons.
  • Sally Franklin, the senior vice president and executive managing editor for Penguin Random House publishing group, testified for 46 minutes. Prosecutors used her testimony to enter excerpts from Trump’s books into evidence. 
  • Stormy Daniels, who’s at the center of the hush money case, was on the stand for 6 hours and 10 minutes over two days of testimony. Daniels walked the jury through details about her alleged sexual encounter with Trump in 2006 and the $130,000 hush money payment from Trump’s ex-attorney Michael Cohen shortly before the 2016 election. Trump attorney Susan Necheles hammered down on Daniels in cross-examination to establish some of the ways she gained publicity and money from her story going public.
  • Rebecca Manochio, a junior bookkeeper at the Trump Organization, testified for about 35 minutes. The prosecution used Manochio to submit invoices, documents and emails as evidence.
  • Tracey Menzies, the senior vice president of production and creative operations at Harper Collins, spoke about one of the books Donald Trump co-authored, “Think Big: Make It Happen in Business and Life,” by Trump and Bill Zanker and read excerpts from the book.
  • Madeleine Westerhout, a former personal assistant to Trump at the White House, detailed how the president preferred to work, his attention to detail and the reaction to the “Access Hollywood” tape.
  • Daniel Dixon, an AT&T lead compliance analyst. He was used to enter phone records into evidence.
  • Jennie Tomalin, Verizon senior analyst in executive relations, was also called to the stand to enter evidence into the records.
  • Georgia Longstreet, who testified on May 3 and May 10, gave evidence about social media posts and text messages.
  • Jaden Jarmel-Schneider, another paralegal from the Manhattan district attorney’s office, testified about analyzing phone records entered into evidence on May 10.

Sketches from Friday's court proceedings

This courtroom sketch shows former President Donald Trump seated in front of presiding Judge Juan Merchan on Friday, with Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg in the foreground.

Cameras aren’t allowed in the courtroom during the trial, but sketch artists have been filling in to give the public an idea of what it looks like.

Check out some of these sketches that were made of Friday’s proceedings, which included testimony from former White House aide Madeleine Westerhout and paralegals Georgia Longstreet and Jaden Jarmel-Schneider.

Former White House aide Madeleine Westerhout testifies on Friday.
Witness Jaden Jarmel-Schneider, a paralegal in the Manhattan district attorney’s office, testifies on Friday.
Georgia Longstreet, a paralegal in the Manhattan district attorney’s office who testified earlier in the trial, took the stand again on Friday, May 10.

Trump laments his gag order: "Everybody can say whatever they want"

Former President Donald Trump, with attorney Todd Blanche, speaks to the press before leaving for the day Friday.

As Donald Trump left court Friday, he lamented his gag order while others say “whatever they want.”

“Everybody can say whatever they want,” he said. “But I’m not allowed to say anything about anybody.”

“It’s a disgrace,” he added.

He went on to show clips of stories criticizing the case, including from Jonathan Turley and Sean Hannity. Trump also repeatedly attacked President Joe Biden and took credit for the stock market going up, claiming it’s a response to his leading in the polls.

During the trial on Friday, CNN’s reporters saw Trump going through a large pile of clips.

Prosecutors leave the courtroom

Prosecutors have left the courtroom following day 15 of Trump’s criminal hush money trial.

Trump leaving courtroom

Trump has turned to leave, papers in hand.

When walking out, he motioned for Jeanine Pirro to follow him. She’s still sitting in her seat in the press gallery.

Merchan tells prosecutors to ask Cohen not to make statements about Trump or the case

Judge Juan Merchan says that he would “direct the people to communicate to Mr. (Michael) Cohen that the judge is asking him to refrain from making any more statements” about this case or Trump.

Merchan tells prosecutors to inform him this is coming from the bench.

Prosecutors say they've "repeatedly" asked their witnesses to not talk about the case

Trump attorney Todd Blance is asking Judge Juan Merchan to order the prosecution to instruct Michael Cohen, who is expected to begin testifying Monday, not to talk about this case.

The defense team is asking “the court order the government to instruct the witness to not talk about President Trump or this case until the case is over,” Blanche says.

Prosecutor Joshua Steinglass responds saying they have “no control” over what witnesses do.

“We have repeatedly — repeatedly — asked the witnesses not to do that,” he says, adding prosecutors “have repeatedly instructed all of the witnesses in this case to the extent we have control over it.”

Defense attorney asks judge to put gag order on Cohen

Trump attorney Todd Blanche is now moving on to ask that the judge put a gag order in place so Michael Cohen cannot speak publicly about the case.

Blanche points to the TikTok Cohen posted this week wearing a white T-shirt with a picture of Trump behind bars. He’s also asking for the judge to order the prosecution to instruct the witness not to talk about this case.

Cohen is expected to begin his testimony on Monday.

Judge Merchan suggests bringing Weisselberg to take the stand outside the presence of jury

Judge Juan Merchan suggests former Trump Organization CFO Allen Weisselberg could be brought in to take the stand outside the presence of the jury and see if he would testify or assert the Fifth Amendment.

“Right now, we’re speculating,” Merchan said.

The judge said he would like to know that Weisselberg won’t testify even if compelled before he can rule on whether the severance agreement is admissible under the rules of evidence.

Prosecutor says they have not attempted to compel Weisselberg's testimony

Judge Juan Merchan asks if anyone has attempted to compel Allen Weisselberg’s testimony.

Prosecutor Chris Conroy says they have not.

“I think it would be helpful to me in making my decision, if I could see that some efforts were taken to compel his appearance,” Merchan says.

Bove says they'll likely need an instruction for the jury about uncalled witnesses on both sides

Defense attorney Emil Bove said they’ll likely need an instruction for the jury about uncalled witnesses on both sides. It is unclear if Donald Trump will testify.

“Mr. (Allen) Weisselberg is in prison right now and not available to anyone,” Bove said.

Bove also said the severance agreement is unduly prejudicial. He argued there would be “undue prejudice” to the jury to admit the severance agreement, saying it’s “unduly confusing” because Weisselberg is in prison.

“If either side tried to call him he would likely invoke” his Fifth Amendment, Bove said.

“We don’t think it’s relevant that he entered into this agreement after the fact,” Bove also said.

Prosecutor Chris Conroy weighed in, saying, “What we are looking to do is explain from our perspective why he’s not here.”

“Mr. Weisselberg’s interest are “aligned with the defendant’s,” Conroy said. 

The agreement includes provisions for Weisselberg not to disparage the company or its officers and employees, Conroy said.

Conroy said he imagines the defense will make arguments about “whether he should’ve been here and what him not being here means.”

Defense objects to prosecution's request to submit Weisselberg's Trump Org. severance agreement into evidence

Prosecutor Chris Conroy says they want to submit Allen Weisselberg’s severance agreement from the Trump Organization into evidence. The defense objects.

“He is an uncalled government witness,” Trump attorney Emil Bove says of Weisselberg, saying the prosecution’s theory is that he conspired with Cohen and gave instructions to McConney.

“Mr. Weisselberg’s absence from this trial is a very complicated issue,” Bove says.

It's "entirely possible" that the prosecution will rest by the end of next week, Steinglass says

Judge Juan Merchan is asking about scheduling.

“We expect to call two witnesses,” prosecutor Joshua Steinglass says. “And I think it’s entirely possible we will rest by the end of next week.”

The key points from Jaden Jarmel-Schneider's testimony: Introducing phone and business records

Jaden Jarmel-Schneider, another paralegal in the Manhattan District Attorney’s office, testified Friday to introduce phone records and business records in the case.

He prepared a summary report to show which phone numbers were associated with which people and where the phone numbers show up in evidence. The report shows the times in both ET and UTC, who the call was from and who it was to and the duration of the call.

His report includes calls between Michael Cohen and Dylan Howard, Cohen and David Pecker, Cohen and Keith Schiller, and Cohen and Allen Weisselberg.

Further, Jarmel-Schneider introduced into evidence a summary chart of the 11 invoices, 12 vouchers and 11 checks that make up the 34 business records prosecutors allege were falsified. Trump has pleaded not guilty to all 34 charges.

On cross-examination, he acknowledged that some call records were removed from the summary report. On redirect, he explained why: “My understanding is the decision was always going to be that we would admit the part of the call summaries related to what had come out in trial.”

Lawyers to discuss evidence before adjourning

Attorneys will be discussing evidence before we adjourn.

Prosecution done with witness testimony for the day

The prosecution just finished with witness testimony for today.

As Judge Juan Merchan read his lengthy instructions to the jury about avoiding news coverage and discussing the case, Trump was in a full conversation with Bove.

Merchan paused and said to them, “You done?”

They stopped talking and looked at him. Merchan then continued.

Jaden Jarmel-Schneider is off the stand

Jaden Jarmel-Schneider is off the stand and his testimony is over.

He testified for 47 minutes.

Paralegal clarifies understanding of Michael Cohen call records

Paralegal Jaden Jarmel-Schneider is clarifying his understanding for why there are two call records around the Michael Cohen recording after Trump attorney Emil Bove had argued that one of them went to voice mail, according to the records.

This is being argued over because these call records happened when the Cohen recording of Donald Trump about former Playboy model Karen McDougal from 2016 was cut off.

“The recording cuts off and that’s why you were looking for a toll like this?” Bove asks.

“Yes,” Jarmel-Schneider said.

“I’m not sure if the recording would’ve automatically cut off whether the call was answered or not,” Jarmel-Schneider added.

Paralegal says calls that were cut are still in evidence elsewhere

Prosecutor Chris Conroy is asking Jaden Jarmel-Schneider about why the summary charts were shortened.

The paralegal said that the calls that were cut from the summary charts are still in evidence elsewhere. He said they were trimmed from the summary exhibit: “My understanding is the decision was always going to be that we would admit the part of the call summaries related to what had come out in trial.”

Prosecutors start another round of questions

The defense team’s cross-examination is over, and prosecutors are now starting another round of questions with Jaden Jarmel-Schneider on the stand.

Prosecutor Chris Conroy is handling this round of questions.

Trump is looking at paralegal as he testifies about call records

Trump attorney Emil Bove is now pulling up a text message previously shown about Trump’s longtime former aide Hope Hicks calling David Pecker, the former CEO of American Media.

Bove asks Jaden Jarmel-Schneider to confirm there were no records of such a call.

Jarmel-Schneider says he doesn’t believe so, but he isn’t sure off the top of his head.

Trump is now looking at Jarmel-Schneider as he testifies.

Some call records were deleted from files, paralegal confirms

Defense attorney Emil Bove is challenging the evidence prosecutors are putting forward, asking paralegal Jaden Jarmel-Schneider about the deletion of some toll records between Keith Davidson and Michael Cohen after the defense submitted recordings between the two from 2018.

The paralegal has admitted that they’ve deleted some call records from the files. Bove also has Jarmel-Schneider confirm that some calls were removed from an exhibit of calls between Gina Rodriguez and Dylan Howard.

Bove said it was three-pages worth of records.

Jarmel-Schneider took issue with Bove characterizing it as a “significant” number but he did acknowledge some were removed.

“At this trial, you’re sort of the guardian of the toll records?” Bove asks.
“I don’t know if I’d say that, but if you say so,” Jarmel-Schneider responds.

Jurors laugh when paralegal says he enjoys tedious work

Trump lawyer Emil Bove began by asking paralegal Jaden Jarmel-Schneider whether the work he prepared took a lot of time.

“At times, tedious work?” Bove asked.

“Honestly, I kind of enjoyed it,” Jarmel-Schneider responds, prompting laughter in the courtroom. Several jurors laughed, too.

“I hear that, respect,” Bove says.

The key point of Georgia Longstreet's testimony: Introducing text messages on Stormy Daniels into evidence

Georgia Longstreet, a paralegal in the Manhattan District Attorney’s office who testified earlier in the trial, took the stand again Friday to introduce records of text messages, contact records and several Trump tweets.

In particular, she read a series of text messages between Stormy Daniels’ former publicist Gina Rodriguez and National Enquirer editor Dylan Howard as they negotiated over a deal to pay Stormy for her story about Trump.

“We’re not doing the Trump deal,” Rodriguez wrote to Howard on October 17, 2016. “They didn’t pay when they said they would and they keep trying to buy more time.”

Just over a week later, Howard texted about the deal again. “I blew a gasket at this people and told them not to f**k with people. Message made and heard.”

Rodriguez responded: “Thank you so much do you think it will happen,” and Howard wrote back, “Yes. They were told in no uncertain terms.”

On cross-examination, Longstreet confirmed she simply read the messages and could not provide any context around them.

Defense is up for cross-examination of paralegal

Trump lawyer Emil Bove is now questioning district attorney office paralegal Jaden Jarmel-Schneider.

Trump looks down as prosecutors recap charges against him

Trump is still looking down at his papers as the document on the 34 charges is displayed. He doesn’t appear to be paying attention during the recap of the charges against him

Jurors look at their screens as document is shown

Most of the jurors are looking at their screens as the document is displayed.

The summary chart shows the 34 business records prosecutors allege have been falsified.

Jury shown summary chart of the 34 business records prosecutors say were falsified

The jury is now seeing a summary chart of the 34 business records that prosecutors allege have been falsified.

This includes 11 invoices, 12 vouchers and 11 checks.

Each respective invoice, voucher or check in the demonstrative exhibit has a corresponding count number to spell out the indictment for the jury

Former Trump attorney says Stormy Daniels tweet is grounds for a mistrial

Former Trump attorney William Brennan criticized Stormy Daniels on CNN today for “taunting the defendant” on social media, and called her actions “grounds for a mistrial.”

Daniels, who testified on Thursday about her alleged sexual encounter in 2006 with the former president, seemingly disparaged Trump on X later that evening: “Real men respond to testimony by being sworn in and taking the stand in court,” she wrote. “Oh…wait. Nevermind.”

Trump on Thursday afternoon had asked Judge Juan Merchan to alter the gag order to allow him to respond publicly to Daniels’ testimony. The judge denied the motion.

Every defendant in the US has the right not to testify, Brennan told CNN on Friday, and juries are instructed not to draw any adverse inference if a defendant chooses not to.

Daniels’ tweets “will play in the hands of the defense,” said Brennan. He said he would ask the judge to poll the jurors and ask if they had seen the tweet and whether it affected them.

“Jurors aren’t supposed to look at social media, but they do,” he claimed.

Trump attorney objects to the next exhibit prosecutors seek to introduce

Trump attorney Emil Bove objects to the next exhibit prosecutors want to introduce. The defense engaged in a sidebar with prosecutors following Bove’s objection.

The next exhibit is a summary chart of vouchers, checks and ledger entries, according to reporters in the courtroom.

Paralegal says he identified incoming call to Cohen's phone at same time recording ended

Paralegal Jaden Jarmel-Schneider said he identified an incoming call to Michael Cohen’s phone at the same time that his recording ended.

For context: Prosecutors have said that Cohen’s recording of his conversation with Doanld Trump about the Karen McDougal payment was cut off by an incoming call. Trump attorney Emil Bove on cross-examination of the computer forensics expert from the district attorney’s office suggested that there was no incoming call. 

Prosecutors going through document showing Cohen-Weisselberg calls

The first document prosecutors are now going through shows calls between Michel Cohen and Allen Weisselberg.

The document includes times in both ET and UTC, who the call was from, who it was to and the duration of the call.

Trump highlighting document as paralegal is on the stand

As another paralegal from the Manhattan district attorney’s office is on the witness stand, Donald Trump is leaning his elbows on the defense table, using a yellow highlighter to highlight lines on a piece of paper in front of him.

He appears to be reading a document and periodically highlighting parts of it, according to journalists in the courtroom. He does not appear to be engaged with the witness testimony.

Calls between Cohen and others are introduced into evidence

Jaden Jarmel-Schneider is now confirming that the exhibits are calls between people like Dylan Howard, Keith Davidson, Gina Rodriguez and other witnesses.

Calls between Michael Cohen and Dylan Howard, Cohen and David Pecker, Cohen and Keith Schiller, and Cohen and Allen Weisselberg are also among those analyzed.

The exhibits are being introduced into evidence.

Paralegal goes through details about how report was prepared

Jaden Jarmel-Schneider is now going through how he prepared the report.

He’s going into details like how they normalized the time zones from the different carriers.

Jury sees paralegal's report detailing contact information

Jaden Jarmel-Schneider prepared a report to show which phone numbers were associated with which people and where the phone numbers show up in evidence.

The report is being shown to the jury.

Next witness: Jaden Jarmel-Schneider 

The next witness is Jaden Jarmel-Schneider, who is another paralegal from the Manhattan district attorney’s office.

Jarmel-Schneider was tasked on this case with analyzing phone records, including the AT&T and Verizon records introduced earlier today.

He reviewed reports on Michael Cohen’s phones. His review included text messages and call logs.

Longstreet testified for 44 minutes today

Georgia Longstreet was recalled to testify again today.

She testified for 44 minutes today.

Last Friday, she testified for 26 minutes, bringing her total time on the stand to an hour and 10 minutes.

Paralegal cannot offer context around social media posts, Trump attorney says

Defense lawyer Todd Blanche is arguing that Georgia Longstreet reads social posts introduced in the trial but cannot offer any context around them.

“When Ms. Rodriguez talks about offers from the Daily Mail and the timing of those offers, you have no knowledge of whether she was telling the truth, do you?” Blanche asks.

“No,” Longstreet says.

Blanche points out that David Pecker testified about texts he was a party to and could offer context, but in this case, Longstreet has no personal knowledge of these text messages, their context or whether any of them are true.

“You just read what was written in the exhibit, correct?” Blanche asks. “And that was different … from when Mr. Pecker is asked the reasoning behind text messages, correct?”
“Yes,” Longstreet says.

“Were you also tasked with reviewing Ms. Daniels’ social media over the past couple of years?” Blanche asks. “Yes,” she answers.

She did not review a tweet from Daniels last night, she says.

Longstreet testifies that she hasn't reviewed Cohen's TikTok account recently

Trump attorney Todd Blanche starts his cross-examination by asking Georgia Longstreet if she has continued to review social media, such as Michael Cohen’s TikTok from several days ago.

Prosecution objects, and Judge Juan Merchan overrules.

Longstreet says she has not reviewed his TikTok account recently.

Defense attorney is now questioning Longstreet

Prosecutors have wrapped up their questioning of Georgia Longstreet. Defense attorney Todd Blanche is now up.

Texts show National Enquirer editor's attempt at reviving Daniels deal in 2016

Georgia Longstreet, a paralegal at the district attorney’s office, read more messages between National Enquirer editor Dylan Howard and Stormy Daniels’ publicist Gina Rodriguez on October 25, 2016.

Howard: “Ok. I blew a gasket at this people and told them not to f**k with people. Message made and heard.”

“I had to apologize to my CEO,” Howard messaged on the same day. “I explained that 2 people saved his a** today and I’m leading this call with his people and I’m going to tell them how it’s going to be.”

Rodriguez responded: “Thank you so much do you think it will happen”

Howard: “Yes. They were told in no uncertain terms”

Howard added: “I’m not going to burn my lifelong contacts for these f**kers”

Stormy Daniels' publicist and National Enquirer discuss deal in 2016 texts

Further texts between Stormy Daniels’ former publicist and National Enquirer editor Dylan Howard on October 17, 2016 show them discussing the deal not happening.

Here’s what they said:

Rodriguez: “We’re not doing the Trump deal”
Howard: “Keith gave me a heads up. What happened?”
Rodriguez: “They didn’t pay when they said they would and they keep trying to buy more time. Daily Mail wants it bad so we’re doing it.”
Howard: “Fair call”
Howard: “They’re (sic) loss”

For context: These messages give the jury firsthand information from both Rodriguez and Howard via their texts about what was going on in 2016, even though neither has testified at this trial.

Messages show negotiations for Daniels' story

A series of text messages between Stormy Daniels’ then-publicist Gina Rodriguez and former National Enquirer editor Dylan Howard regarding their negotiations for Daniels’ story were introduced to jurors today.

Here are those messages:

Howard: “I can get 100”
Rodriguez: “Lol”
Rodriguez: “Ok what about 150”
Howard: “110”
Rodriguez: “125k”
Howard: “lol”
Howard: “120”
Rodriguez: “Sold”

Daniels' publicist tells National Enquirer editor she is willing to confirm her story on record, texts show

The texts that are being read have now moved into October 2016, when Stormy Daniels’ former publicist Gina Rodriguez tells then-National Enquirer editor Dylan Howard that Daniels is willing to confirm her story on the record.

On October 8, 2016, Rodriguez texted: “Stormy Daniels and Trump with her [REDACTED LINES] is up on the Dirty and Fox News has been calling Stormy has not confirmed or spoken are you interested?”

Howard asks Rodriguez to email him the pitch so he can elevate it to then-CEO David Pecker. “He likely will pay,” Howard texts, with Rodriguez writing, “250k.”

Jurors mostly looking at their screens

Jurors are mostly looking at their screens, which are displaying the text messages that Georgia Longstreet is reading.

Daniels publicist followed up with National Enquirer publisher several times about using her story, texts show

Georgia Longstreet, a paralegal at the district attorney’s office, is reading additional text messages that show Stormy Daniels’ publicist Gina Rodriguez followed up with National Enquirer editor Dylan Howard several times asking about how AMI, the publisher of the National Enquirer, was handling Daniels’ story.

On July 23, 2016, Rodriguez said, “What happened with the Stormy Daniels interview on Trump.”

Howard responded, “Let’s discuss this week.”

Texts show National Enquirer editor asked Daniels' publicist: "Is she ready to talk?"

Georgia Longstreet is now reading more texts between Stormy Daniels’ publicist Gina Rodriguez and National Enquirer editor Dylan Howard into record.

The jury saw saw these texts during Daniels testimony.

On June 28, 2016, Howard texted Rodriguez: “Is she ready to talk?” and “I thought she denounced it previously.”

Rodriguez responded: “She said she will do it under two conditions” and “She never did.”

Jurors shown messages from former National Enquirer editor and Daniels' then-publicist

Georgia Longstreet is now being shown messages between former National Enquirer editor Dylan Howard and Stormy Daniels’ then-publicist Gina Rodriguez.

On June 28, Rodriguez wrote to Howard, “are you working in favor of trump?”

Howard responded immediately: “Out (typo) CEO endorsed him but I’m not no.”

The messages were visible on the screen. Longstreet is now reading some of them.

One message from Rodriguez on April 7 2016 read, “But Stormy Daniels was his mistress.”
Howard responded that same day, “I bet she was.”
And also, “Can u email me what u have on that?”
Rodriguez said, “Yes I will.”

Trump tweet about Cohen's monthly retainer and NDA is read in court

Georgia Longstreet continues reading tweets from Donald Trump, including a thread from May 3, 2018, which starts out:

“Mr. Cohen, an attorney, received a monthly retainer, not from the campaign and having nothing to do with the campaign, from which he entered into, through reimbursement, a private contract between two parties, known as a non-disclosure agreement, or NDA.”

The tweet was at the same time Rudy Giuliani told Fox News’ Sean Hannity that Trump paid back Cohen the $130,000 in hush money that was used to pay off Stormy Daniels.

Some context: Trump’s attorneys fought this tweet about the Cohen retainer and others from coming in before trial, arguing that Trump should be protected by presidential immunity for these public posts he published during what they argued was his capacity as president. This was also one of the unsuccessful attempts to delay the trial. His lawyers asked at the time for Judge Juan Merchan to wait for the Supreme Court to weigh in on Trump’s presidential immunity claim.

Jury shown Trump tweets about Cohen

Jurors are now being shown some of Donald Trump’s tweets.

The first set is a thread related to Michael Cohen, dated April 21, 2018.

It also attacks New York Times reporter Maggie Haberman, who is in the courtroom today as well.

To note: This tweet is days after Cohen’s home, apartment and hotel room were raided by the FBI.

Georgia Longstreet reads another tweet from Trump on August 22, 2018: “If anyone is looking for a good lawyer, I would strongly suggest that you don’t retain the services of Michael Cohen!”

There are audible laughs to this from the public section in the overflow room.

Another tweet is read from the same day, in which Trump writes he feels “very badly for Paul Manafort and his wonderful family.”

Remember: The day before this tweet, on August 21, Paul Manafort was found guilty in federal court and Cohen pleaded guilty.

Judge Merchan overrules Trump attorney's objection to tweets admitted to evidence

Trump attorney Todd Blanche renewed his objection to tweets from the former president being admitted to evidence. Judge Juan Merchan overruled the objection.

Paralegals reviewed over 10,000 pages of call records for this case, Longstreet says

Georgia Longstreet is testifying about the text messages she reviewed for this case. She and the other paralegals on the case have reviewed 500 pages of text messages in relation to the case. She’s personally reviewed about 100 pages.

The paralegals have reviewed over 10,000 pages of call records for the case. She’s personally reviewed about 200 to 300, she says.

The paralegals have reviewed 300 to 500 pages of contact records. She says she’s matched about 50 contacts to phone records.

They also reviewed 75 different court cases.

Paralegal testifies about how prosecutors are entering Trump tweets into evidence

Georgia Longstreet says the team of paralegals have reviewed and saved public posts from Trump’s Twitter account. This is how prosecutors are entering additional Trump tweets into evidence.

Analysis: What are custodial witnesses and why are we seeing so many?

Donald Trump’s hush money criminal trial has seen a number of so-called custodial witnesses, including from AT&T and Verizon this morning.

Their testimony, while dry, is a way for prosecution to enter records they hold as evidence for the case. They can bring things like receipts, book excerpts and other things that are key to the case.

As AT&T lead compliance analyst Daniel Dixon testified, CNN’s Jeremy Herb said from court: “This may be the most tedious testimony of the trial so far, which is required like other records custodians because Trump’s lawyers would not agree to admit the evidence.”

Some other examples of custodial witnesses that we have seen in the trial: Tracey Menzies of Harper Collins, Sally Franklin of Penguin Random House publishing group, Digital evidence analyst Douglas Daus and paralegal Georgia Longstreet from the district attorney’s office.

Paralegal in district attorney's office called back to the stand

Georgia Longstreet is being called back to the witness stand.

The paralegal at the Manhattan district attorney’s office testified last week. Longstreet tells prosecutor Rebecca Mangold that as part of her duties as a paralegal, she’s responsible for analyzing records produced via subpoena.

Prosecutors have 2 more witnesses to call

Prosecutors have two more witnesses, which they estimate will take about an hour, according to reporters in the courtroom.

They have one more evidentiary issue to take up after their testimonies.

Judge says court proceedings will end early today

Judge Juan Merchan says they are going to end early today. They are going until 1 p.m. ET or perhaps a bit later but will not be returning after lunch.

Judge won't allow Trump 1999 interview on campaign finance into evidence

Judge Juan Merchan sides with the defense and says he will not allow Trump’s interview in 1999 about campaign finance into evidence.

He says trying to draw an inference to what he knew in 2015 or 2017 is a step too far.

Judge back on the bench

After a short break, Judge Juan Merchan is on the bench.

Prosecutors are back in court

Prosecutors are back inside the courtroom following a short break. Trump and his attorneys have also returned.

Trump scanned the courtroom before taking his seat.

Trump has left the courtroom

Donald Trump has left the courtroom. He gave Fox News host Jeanine Pirro a pat on the shoulder as he walked out into the hallway.

Defense attorney objecting to upcoming exhibit of Trump interview in 1999

Lawyers are now taking up an objection to an upcoming exhibit.

Defense attorney Emil Bove says the exhibit is a clip of Trump on “Larry King Live” in 1999 being asked about campaign finance laws. Bove argues that Trump’s views on campaign finance in 1999 are not relevant to his state of mind in 2016 or 2017.

“There was extensive revisions to campaign finance laws in intervening period both statutory and by the Supreme Court,” Bove argues.

Prosecutor Rebecca Mangold says that the corporate contribution ban, which is what’s relevant here, has been part of campaign finance law since 1907.

Judge Juan Merchan says he will rule after the break.

Tomalin testified for 12 minutes

Jennie Tomalin is off the stand. She testified for 12 minutes.

Court takes morning break

The court is taking a short break and jurors are leaving the courtroom.

Trump lawyer asks about Verizon record for Keith Davidson

Trump attorney Emil Bove is asking Jennie Tomalin about the Verizon records, including one for Keith Davidson.

Remember: Davidson is the former attorney for Stormy Daniels and Karen McDougal. He testified last week.

Trump attorney starts cross-examination of Tomalin

Prosecutors have finished their first questions for Jennie Tomalin. Trump attorney Emil Bove is now asking her questions.

Prosecutors introduce 12 subscriber phone records, including one from Weisselberg, through Tomalin

The records that prosecutors are introducing through Jennie Tomalin relate to 12 subscriber phone records, she says.

The records from Verizon are accepted into evidence, including one of a phone for Allen Weisselberg.

For context: These phone records being introduced into evidence are likely to be used later on by prosecutors.

Next witness: Jennie Tomalin

Jennie Tomalin is the next witness. She works for Verizon as a senior analyst in executive relations.

Tomalin is also testifying about call and subscriber records kept by Verizon.

Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg enters courtroom

Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg has entered the courtroom.

Judge quashes Trump's subpoena for Pomerantz records

In a written order Friday, Judge Juan Merchan granted prosecutors motion to quash a subpoena from Donald Trump’s lawyers seeking to compel former Manhattan prosecutor Mark Pomerantz to turn over more records.

Merchan called Trump’s request for “all Documents” for a 13-month period from several individuals covering a range of topics including “Cohen’s recollection of interactions with President Trump” and “any form of bias or animosity toward President Trump” an “improper fishing expedition.”

Trump’s lawyers also asked for all documents relating to a February 2021 internal memo on “whether Stephanie Clifford a/k/a ‘Stormy Daniels,’ committed ‘extortion and or ‘larceny,’ and (b) whether President Trump was a ‘victim of blackmail.”

Merchan ruled Friday that the information is protected as privileged work product while also calling the request impermissibly broad. Merchan denied another request in the subpoena seeking years worth of communications between personnel within the Manhattan DA’s office calling it an apparent “attempt to obtain DANY’s internal communications about their discovery obligations.”

The order notes Trump’s legal team has received some discovery from Pomerantz as recently as March before the trial began.

Dixon is off the stand

There is no redirect, and Daniel Dixon leaves the witness stand.

He testified for 23 minutes.

These phone records don't reflect the content of calls, Dixon confirms

Trump attorney Emil Bove is now asking about the limits of certain call records.

“These records don’t reflect the content of these calls?” Bove asks.

“Correct,” Daniel Dixon says.

“You can’t tell from the records themselves who actually spoke?” Bove asks.

“Correct,” Dixon says.

“You’re familiar with the concept of a pocket dial?” Bove asks, suggesting the transactional record shown could’ve been an accidental call.

Trump attorney asks about SIM cards

Trump attorney Emil Bove is asking about what one code on the form stands for. “It’s the serial number of a SIM card,” Dixon says.

A SIM “can be pulled out of one phone and put into another,” Bove says.

“Yes,” Dixon confirms.

Cross-examination is starting

Cross-examination of Daniel Dixon is now beginning.

Trump lawyer Emil Bove introduces himself and says he represents former President Donald Trump over to his left.

Dixon glances over and smiles, appearing to shift in his seat when he acknowledges Trump.

Jurors are following along, looking at their monitors.

Most jurors are paying attention to Dixon's testimony

Most of the jurors are still paying attention to Daniel Dixon’s testimony. Dixon, a AT&T lead compliance analyst, is testifying about call-detail records and subscriber records.

However, one juror has his head down during this testimony.

Dixon provides thorough details on phone company reports, including definitions of certain terms

Daniel Dixon is now going into detail about what subscriber reports are and what call-detail records are.

He is defining certain words, including “mobility,” “wireline,” “voice usage” and “SMS.” He adds that AT&T records are kept in the UTC time zone.

This may be the most tedious testimony of the trial so far. It’s required, like other records custodians, because Trump’s lawyers would not agree to admit the evidence.

Analysis: Madeleine Westerhout "softens" Trump says Kristen Holmes

Madeleine Westerhout, despite being called by the prosecution, served largely as a character witness that softened the appearance of former President Donald Trump, said CNN national correspondent Kristen Holmes on Friday morning.

“I do think that [Westerhout’s] testimony, in general, helps the defense because it softens Donald Trump,” said Holmes. “I mean, look at the witnesses that we’ve had so far – the kind of seedy underbelly that Donald Trump was associating with, or associating through Michael Cohen with. Then you have the ‘Access Hollywood tape,’ then you have this alleged affair in graphic detail with a porn star.”

Westerhout also said during her testimony that she wrote a book about her time in the administration because she felt that the president was mistreated and misrepresented publicly.

“I mean, she was a character witness for him,” said Holmes.

Cohen's cell phone is one of the records admitted into evidence

One of the AT&T records admitted into evidence is for Michael Cohen’s cell phone.

Prosecutors admit AT&T records into evidence

The records from AT&T have been admitted into evidence. They are being brought up to show jurors.

Westerhout testified for 1 hour and 50 minutes over 2 days

Madeleine Westerhout, a former White House aide, testified for an hour and 50 minutes over two days.

AT&T analyst asked about call-detail and subscriber records

Daniel Dixon is being asked about call-detail records and subscriber records that are kept by AT&T.

AT&T lead compliance analyst is the next witness

Daniel Dixon, who works as a lead compliance analyst for AT&T, is the next witness.

He is testifying under subpoena to AT&T as a records custodian.

The key points of Madeleine Westerhout's testimony

Madeleine Westerhout, a former White House aide, testified Thursday that she brought Trump a manilla envelope of checks each month to sign, as prosecutors sought to show the chain of command of the checks sent to Michael Cohen that are at the heart of the falsified business records case.

On cross-examination today, Westerhout testified that Trump would sign many checks without reviewing them, multi-tasking while on the phone and while meeting people.

In addition, the prosecution has argued that Trump made the payments to influence the election, while the defense has said the payments were to protect his family. Westerhout testified that when the story about Stormy Daniels came out, Trump was “very upset,” adding, “My understanding was it would be hurtful to his family.”

But on redirect from prosecutors, she clarified, “He didn’t specifically speak about his family in that conversation.”

Westerhout smiles at Trump as she leaves the stand

Madeleine Westerhout is off the stand and her testimony is over.

She raised her eyebrows and smiled at Trump as she left the courtroom. He smiled back at her and mouthed something.

At the end of redriect, Westerhout confirmed she works as the chief of staff to the chair of American Global Strategies, who is Trump’s former national security adviser Robert O’Brien.

Westerhout says FedEx method of sending checks was a way to get things to Trump "faster"

Prosecutor Rebecca Mangold is asking whether the FedEx method of sending checks was an “end run” around White House security protocols.

“Not to my understanding,” Westerhout says, adding that it was a way to get things to Trump “faster.”

Westerhout spoke with defense and prosecutors ahead of testimony

Madeleine Westerhout spoke with defense attorney Susan Necheles once before on Wednesday night — the day before she was called as a witness.

The meeting with Necheles was for one hour via zoom. Westerhout met with prosecutors three times for hours.

More on this: At the start of most cross-examinations, the defense attorneys have noted they have not previously spoken to witnesses. It is not uncommon for witnesses to speak with prosecutors or defense attorneys.

Cross-examination is over and prosecutors are now asking more questions

The defense is done with cross-examination. Prosecutor Rebecca Mangold is back up with another round of questions for Madeleine Westerhout.

Trump was "very upset" by Daniels' story, Westerhout testifies

Madeleine Westerhout says she spoke with Donald Trump after the article about the Stormy Daniels story was published.

“He was very upset by it,” Westerhout says. “My understanding was he knew it would be hurtful to his family.”

Westerhout then clarifies that was her understanding but not that Trump specifically said that to her. “He didn’t specifically speak about his family in that conversation,” she says.

Defense attorney asks about invoice from golf club

Donald Trump’s attorney Susan Necheles is now asking about an invoice from the Winged Foot Golf Club, where longtime assistant Rhona Graff had asked for Madeleine Westerhout’s help in whether to suspend or pay for his membership while he was president.

“He answered one word, just pay,” Necheles says. “Boom, it was off his desk.”

“Yes,” Westerhout says.

Trump is a multitasker, former White House aide says

“He was a person who would multitask?” Trump attorney Susan Necheles asks about the former president.

“Definitely,” Madeleine Westerhout says.

Trump signed documents without reviewing them, Westerhout confirms

Trump attorney Susan Necheles is asking about Trump’s habits on signing and reviewing documents.

She’s digging into whether he was signing hundreds of documents a day. “Not every day, but sometimes,” Westerhout says.

“Would you see him signing things without reviewing them,” Necheles asks.
“Yes,” Madeleine Westerhout says.

Westerhout confirms that Trump would sign checks while doing other things, like sometimes while he was on the phone or meeting with others.

Westerhout says Trump would sign checks "if he had the time" and was in the office

Former Trump aide Madeleine Westerhout testified about the personal mailing issues inside the White House and said “I don’t know what it was like in other administrations but I can’t imagine it would’ve been any different.”

“If he had the time when you gave them to him he would sign them right away,” Westerhout said after Trump attorney Susan Necheles asked about the checks.

“If he had the time… and if he was in the office, yes,” Westerhout said.

Trump attorney offers explanation for why Trump's personal mail was sent to employees' personal addresses

Trump attorney Susan Necheles is now going back to prosecutors’ argument that some of the checks Trump handled were sent to employees’ personal addresses

“That’s what this whole testimony about FedEx packages was about, right? It was a way items could be sent to you, and you could get them promptly to President Trump,” Necheles asks, placing emphasis on the word promptly.

“That’s right,” Madeleine Westerhout says.

With this line of questioning, Necheles is offering an innocent explanation through Westerhout for why Trump’s personal mail — like the checks to be signed for Trump’s personal account — were sent to an employee’s personal address rather than through official White House channels.

Keith Schiller ended up receiving mail for the Trumps due to P.O. Box delays, Westerhout testifies

When speaking about the slowness of receiving personal items via a post office box, Madeleine Westerhout agrees the delay is how Keith Schiller — the former president’s bodyguard — ended up receiving personal mail for Donald Trump and Melania Trump.

Trump felt it was disrespectful if he didn't return calls promptly, she says

Trump felt it was disrespectful if he didn’t return calls promptly, Madeleine Westerhout tells defense attorney Susan Necheles during cross-examination.

Former White House aide says she was told a post office box was set up for Trump to get personal items

Madeleine Westerhout is saying that at some point, she was told a post office box was set up for the president to receive personal items.

Trump attorney Susan Necheles asks whether they learned that was a “really slow way to receive things?”

“Yes,” Westerhout says with a laugh.

There were times personal items were sent to the White House and Trump never received them, Westerhout confirms to Necheles.

Trump attorney is moving on to questions about Trump's checks

Trump attorney Susan Necheles is now moving onto a line of questioning about checks.

Madeleine Westerhout testified yesterday about how checks were sent from the Trump Organization to the White House employee.

“You walked into the White House and you don’t know how President will get personal items?” Necheles asks now.

“No I did not,” Westerhout says.

Judge denies introducing travel schedules into evidence

Judge Juan Merchan is denying the introduction of the travel schedules into evidence.

Prosecutors objecting over travel schedules

The first sidebar ended, and Trump lawyer Susan Necheles started asking Madeleine Westerhout about his travel schedules.

But they are now back at the bench after prosecutors are objecting over travel schedules.

Prosecutor Rebecca Mangold was given the chance to ask Westerhout about whether she had viewed these specific schedules. Westerhout said her lawyer had shown them to her this morning but she wasn’t sure whether she had seen these specific schedules while she still worked at the RNC.

Here are some scenes from inside the courtroom

One juror started a second legal pad after he turned the page and reached the end of his first legal pad.

Trump is watching Madeleine Westerhout. He’s hunched forward and resting on his elbows.

Meanwhile, Trump campaign manager Susie Wiles is back in court seated in the front row behind the defense table.

Trump and attorney chat while lawyers are at sidebar

Trump and attorney Todd Blanche are again chatting while lawyers are at sidebar after an objection from the prosecution.

Madeleine Westerhout is looking around the room, though not toward the defendant’s table.

Westerhout recounts Trump and Weisselberg speaking during first year in office

Trump attorney Susan Necheles asked former White House aide Madeleine Westerhout whether she has any specific recollection of former Trump Organization CFO Allen Weisselberg and Trump speaking during the first year that he was in office.

“That’s correct, yes,” Westerhout says.

“In fact, you really don’t recall any calls specifically between him and Allen Weisselberg?” Necheles asked.

“No he spoke to so many people,” Westerhout said.

Trump sent newspaper clippings to contacts "quite often," Westerhout says

Madeleine Westerhout confirms Trump often sent newspaper clippings to his contacts. Prosecutors have cited the fact he had sent a copy to Trump Organization CFO Allen Weisselberg.

Westerhout laughs as she confirms she saw Trump send newspaper clippings to “everyone” but also says she doesn’t recall him sending any other clippings to Allen Weisselberg specifically.

Trump attorney Susan Necheles asks if sending newspaper clippings to his contacts was something Trump did often.

“Yes, quite often,” Westerhout says.

Jury shown New York Times front page with photo of Trump on Air Force One

The jury is seeing a New York Times front page with the photo of Trump traveling on Air Force One for the first time.

Defense attorney Susan Necheles says, “Kind of an exciting thing, right?”

“Very exciting, yeah,” Madeleine Westerhout says, smiling.

“He was proud,” Necheles confirms with Westerhout who says “he was.”

Questioning now focuses on list of Trump's contacts

The jury is now seeing a list of Donald Trump’s contacts provided by Rhona Graff, Trump’s former longtime assistant. 

Madeleine Westerhout says that the list of contacts included people he spoke to before he became president, as well as people he “might be interested in speaking to, to invite them to the White House or something.”

“There were many people on that list who never called the Oval Office?” defense attorney Susan Necheles asks.
“Yes many,” Westerhout agrees.

Necheles emphasizes these are people who Trump might contact before taking office. Westerhout confirms.

RNC and Trump campaign worked together on travel schedules, Westerhout says

Madeleine Westerhout is answering questions about how the Republican National Committee and Trump’s campaign worked together on schedules.

“Am I correct that every day, the RNC and the campaign would jointly create a travel schedule,” Trump attorney Susan Necheles asks.

“Whenever the president-elect was traveling, yes,” Westerhout says.

Trump attorney starts questioning by asking Westerhout about RNC

Trump attorney Susan Necheles is resuming questioning.

Necheles begins by asking Madeleine Westerhout about 2016, while she was working for the Republican National Committee.

Westerhout confirms the RNC and the Trump campaign worked extremely closely together.

Jury enters courtroom

The jury has entered the courtroom.

Westerhout back on witness stand

Former White House aide Madeleine Westerhout is back on the witness stand to continue her testimony.

She is looking over at the defense table and smiled.

Attorneys approach the bench before start of proceedings

Attorneys are approaching the bench before the proceedings begin for day 15 of Donald Trump’s hush money trial.

Trump’s attorney Todd Blanche is sitting with the former president and whispering to him.

Analysis: Madeleine Westerhout is "a prosecutors' dream," says former federal prosecutor Gene Rossi

Former Trump White House aide Madeleine Westerhout is a “dream” witness for prosecutors because she “still loves Trump,” according to legal analyst Gene Rossi.

“When you have a witness for the prosecution that are biased toward the defendant, and they say things that don’t help the defendant, in terms of how the checks were cashed presented and all that, it’s very devastating or harmful to the defense,” Rossi, a former federal prosecutor, told CNN on Friday morning.

Westerhout, who served as the director of Oval Office Operations under Trump and was one of the chief gatekeepers to the president as his personal assistant, is a “great way [for the prosecution] to end the week,” said Rossi.

Court is in session

Judge Juan Merchan is on the bench, and court is in session for the day.

Trump is whispering with his attorney

Trump is whispering with his attorney Todd Blanche at the defendant’s table before Judge Juan Merchan enters the courtroom.

Trump walking into courtroom

Donald Trump is entering the courtroom. He has some papers that appear to be news stories printed out in color in his hand.

Prosecutors are entering the courtroom

Prosecutors are entering the courtroom this morning ahead of the start of day 15 of Trump’s hush money trial.

Trump's motorcade has arrived at court

Former President Donald Trump’s motorcade has arrived at the Manhattan courthouse where he’ll attend his criminal hush money trial. 

Here are some key takeaways from Trump's criminal hush money trial on Thursday

Defense attorney Susan Necheles cross-examines Stormy Daniels during the trial on Thursday, May 9.

Former President Donald Trump’s lawyers continued their attack on the credibility of Stormy Daniels for several hours Thursday, with defense attorney Susan Necheles accusing the adult film star of making up the story of having sex with Trump.

Thursday also saw testimony from a woman who was once among the closest people working with Trump in the White House, and failed efforts by the defense to get a mistrial and an exception to the defendant’s gag order.

Here are some key takeaways from Day 14 of the Trump hush money trial:

Contentious testimony: Daniels combatively and defiantly responded to questions from Necheles, insisting her story of a sexual encounter with Trump was true. Trump has denied the affair.

Trump’s attorney asked about minor inconsistencies in interviews Daniels has given about her interactions with Trump. Necheles also picked apart how Daniels has previously described the encounter.

Necheles also insinuated Daniels had employed her skills as a porn writer in making up the story. “You have a lot of experience of making phony stories about sex appear to be real,” the Trump attorney asked.

“Wow,” Daniels said, with a pause. “That’s not how I would put it. The sex in the films is very much real, just like what happened to me in that room.”

Lawyers spar over Daniels’ financial situation: Beyond the details of the alleged encounter itself, Trump’s attorneys and prosecutors had Daniels tell conflicting accounts of her financial situation.

Necheles continued to suggest that Daniels was making money off of saying she had sex with Trump, pointing to a tweet where she said she’d earned $1 million and others where she directed her supporters to her online store after Trump was indicted.

Prosecutors, meanwhile, had Daniels recount how telling her story has also cost her, from having to move her daughter and hire security to the lawyers’ fees she was ordered to pay after she sued Trump and lost.

Former aide takes us inside the Trump White House: Former White House aide Madeleine Westerhout described the inner workings of Trump’s West Wing, where she worked for more than two years sitting just outside the Oval Office.

Westerhout described Trump’s work habits, from his affinity for sharpies and hard copies of documents, to his close control over his social media posts and his preference to talk to people in person or on the phone — not by email.

While she did not testify to direct knowledge of the checks Trump signed to his former fixer Michael Cohen, which are cited in the charges against Trump, her story added to the prosecution’s narrative about his involvement with the checks in 2017.

Two failed efforts by Trump’s team: Judge Juan Merchan denied the request from Trump’s lawyers to make an exception to the gag order allowing him to speak publicly about Daniels, saying he must protect the integrity of the proceedings, and he doesn’t trust Trump not to violate an order if he were to modify it.

The judge also denied Trump’s renewed motion for a mistrial over the salacious testimony Daniels gave, which his attorneys say unfairly prejudices the jury against Trump. Merchan said the specificity is important to helping the jury make a determination.

Read a full recap of Thursday’s proceedings here.

Michael Cohen is expected to begin his testimony on Monday

Donald Trump’s former attorney Michael Cohen is expected to begin his testimony in the criminal hush money case on Monday, according to a person familiar with the case.

Cohen is at the center of the hush money payment and is expected to implicate Trump in the reimbursement payments.

Prosecutors allege Trump falsified business records to cover up his reimbursement to Cohen of the $130,000 payment he advanced to Stormy Daniels to silence her from going public about a past tryst. Trump has denied the affair.

His testimony, which is expected to last days, is likely to be the last substantive witness to take the stand in the prosecution’s case.

Trump faces dozens of counts of falsifying business records. This is what prosecutors are working to prove

Former President Donald Trump sits in Manhattan Criminal Court in New York on Monday, May 6.

Former President Donald Trump is on trial in Manhattan for his alleged role in a hush money scheme to silence his alleged mistresses before the 2016 election. He faces 34 counts related to “falsifying New York business records in order to conceal damaging information and unlawful activity from American voters before and after the 2016 election.” 

Prosecutors need to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Trump falsified business records with the intent to commit or conceal another crime, but they don’t have to prove that Trump committed that crime. The prosecution theory is that the second crime could be in violation of federal and state election laws or state tax laws regarding how the reimbursements to Michael Cohen were handled. 

Adult film actress Stormy Daniels was paid $130,000 – the “hush money” payment – to keep her from going public before the 2016 election about her claim that she had an affair with Trump in 2006. The alleged reimbursement payment Trump made to Cohen is at the heart of the charges against the former president.

Trump’s attorneys have kept their defense close to the vest, but in court filings they’ve indicated that they plan to attack the credibility of Cohen and Daniels and paint them as liars who are motivated by grudges and money.

Stormy Daniels finished her testimony in Trump’s hush money trial on Thursday. Here’s what to know

Adult film actress Stormy Daniels leaves Manhattan Criminal Court in New York after testifying on Thursday.

Donald Trump’s lawyers finished their cross-examination of Stormy Daniels on Thursday and spent most of the time trying to undermine her credibility by pointing out inconsistencies in her story.

In her more than 6 hours of testimony over two days, Daniels described her first meeting with Trump, the details of their alleged sexual encounter in 2006 and how the hush money payment unfolded years later. The defense tried to establish some of the ways the porn star gained publicity and money from her story going public.

The other witnesses on Thursday were a junior bookkeeper at the Trump Organization, an employee of Harper Collins and Trump’s former personal assistant at the White House. 

Here’s what happened in court on Thursday:

Stormy Daniels on cross-examination: 

  • Trump lawyer Susan Necheles pointed out that in a January 2018 statement, Daniels denied a sexual encounter with Trump. Later that same month, Daniels put out a second statement denying the relationship. She said she was pushed to sign the statement by Michael Cohen via attorney Keith Davidson. 
  • Necheles asked Daniels if she eventually wanted to publicly announce she had sex with Trump. “No. Nobody would ever want to publicly say that. I wanted to publicly defend myself,” Daniels testified. 
  • Necheles sought to establish examples of how Daniels benefitted from the story. A “60 Minutes” interview and appearances on CNN and “The View” brought Daniels publicity, Necheles said. Daniels argued her then-lawyer Michael Avenatti arranged her appearances. 
  • Necheles challenged Daniels on her story, saying it “has changed a lot over the years,” citing Daniels’ description of the floors in Trump’s hotel room. The Trump attorney also asked if Daniels fabricated the story about the encounter with Trump, which Daniels denied.

On redirect: 

  • Prosecutor Susan Hoffinger went through Daniels’ motivation for entering the non-disclosure agreement, including her fear for safety. While Daniels has made money with the Trump story, it has also cost her, Hoffinger said. Daniels said now she’s had to hire security and move her daughter to a safe place to live, in addition to the money she owes Trump in attorney’s fees. 
  • Hoffinger asked, “Have you been telling lies about Mr. Trump or the truth about Mr. Trump?” Daniels responded, “The truth.” 

Rebecca Manochio: 

  • Manochio, who still works at the Trump Organization as a junior bookkeeper, said when Trump was in the White House, she would FedEx checks once a week, often 10 to 20 at a time. The checks were mailed back to the Trump Organization, signed by Trump, usually within a few days.
  • When she received the checks back from Washington, she would give them to Deb Tarasoff, who works in the accounting department and testified earlier in the trial. 
  • Prosecutors used Manochio to submit documents into evidence that showed Trump’s personal checks were facilitated in Washington, DC, by Trump Organization bodyguard Keith Schiller and then by Trump personal aid John McEntee once Schiller left. This is important because the crux of this case comes down to how the former president’s team handled a hush money payment to Daniels. 
  • On cross-examination, Manochio said she didn’t interact directly with Trump and she only sent him personal checks for his signature. She also testified that she also sent personal checks to Ivanka Trump

Tracey Menzies 

  • Menzies is the senior vice president of production and creative operations at Harper Collins. Testifying as a custodian of records for the publishing company, Menzies said. 
  • Prosecutors read excerpts from the book “Think Big: Make it Happen in Business and Life” for the jury. Several of them were about Trump’s value of loyalty in his business. Other excerpts were about revenge

Madeleine Westerhout 

  • As the former director of Oval Office Operations, Westerhout was one of the chief gatekeepers to the president as his personal assistant.
  • When the 2016 “Access Hollywood” tape came out, Westerhout said she remembered it “rattling RNC leadership.” She testified that she recalled conversations about how to replace Trump on the presidential ticket, “if it came to that.” Later, she told the defense on cross-examination that Trump was not as concerned about the tape as those around him. 
  • From Westerhout’s experience working with Trump, she said the former president was “attentive to things that were brought to his attention.” She also testified about Trump’s preferences — including that he did not use a computer or have an email address and preferred hard copies of documents. 
  • She said she recalls that Trump was “very upset” by the Stormy Daniels story potentially coming out. Westerhout testified that Trump spoke to Cohen around that time. 

Judge makes other rulings: Judge Juan Merchan denied the defense’s motion for a mistrial. He said he disagrees with the Trump team’s assertion that Daniels gave a new account in her testimony this week. He also denied a motion to modify the gag order to allow Trump to talk about Daniels.

Trump is on his way to court

Former President Donald Trump is en route to the Manhattan courthouse to attend his criminal hush money trial.  

Follow the paper trail: See how the prosecution is attempting to link charges in the hush money trial 

New York prosecutors introduced documents into evidence this week that they say establish Donald Trump’s knowledge of “falsifying business records” to cover up his repayments to his former attorney, Michael Cohen, who paid Stormy Daniels “hush money” in 2016. 

CNN has transcribed some of the handwritten notes in the exhibits, and what prosecutors say they hope to establish for the jury. 

Click here to see some of the documents that have been submitted as evidence. 

Catch up on what has already happened in Trump's hush money trial

This sketch by CNN's Jake Tapper shows Stormy Daniels on the witness stand on Thursday, May 9. At the bottom right is defense attorney Susan Necheles.

We are in the fourth week of court proceedings in Donald Trump’s historic hush money criminal trial.

To refresh your memory, here are the key moments and witnesses from the trial so far:

April 15: Trial began with jury selection.

April 19: A panel of 12 jurors and six alternates was selected.

April 22: The prosecution and defense made their opening statements. Former tabloid boss David Pecker was called to testify.

April 23: Judge Juan Merchan held a Sandoval hearing for Trump’s alleged gag order violations, but reserved his decision.

April 25: While Trump sat in the Manhattan courtroom, the Supreme Court in Washington, D.C., heard arguments on the matter of his immunity in special counsel Jack Smith’s election subversion case against him.

April 26: Pecker’s direct questioning and cross-examination concluded. Trump’s former longtime assistant Rhona Graff was called to testify briefly. Finally, Michael Cohen’s former banker Gary Farro testified.

April 30: Farro’s testimony concluded. Prosecutors then called Dr. Robert Browning, the executive director of C-SPAN archives, and Philip Thompson who works for a court reporting company. Then, Keith Davidson, the former attorney for Daniels and McDougal, took the stand.

May 2: Davidson’s testimony concluded. Digital evidence analyst Douglas Daus was called to testify.

May 3: After Daus finished testifying, Georgia Longstreet, a paralegal at the district attorney’s office, spoke about reviewing Trump’s social media posts for this case. She was followed by Hope Hicks, once a longtime Trump aide. Her highly anticipated testimony was a little less than three hours.

May 6: Prosecutors called two witnesses who worked in accounting in the Trump Organization: Jeffrey McConney, a former Trump Org. controller, and Deborah Tarasoff, an accounts payable supervisor.

May 7: Prosecutors called Sally Franklin, the senior vice president and executive managing editor for Penguin Random House publishing group. After her testimony, Stormy Daniels was called to the stand.

May 9: Stormy Daniels finished her testimony, with the defense trying to undermine her credibility by pointing out inconsistencies in her story on cross-examination. Prosecutors also called Rebecca Manochio, a junior bookkeeper at the Trump Organization, Tracey Menzies, an employee of Harper Collins, and Madeleine Westerhout, Trump’s former personal assistant at the White House. 

Read a full timeline of key moments here.

What to know about the 3 other criminal cases involving Donald Trump

Former President Donald Trump arrives at Manhattan Criminal Court in New York on Thursday.

The hush money criminal trial against former President Donald Trump is one of four criminal cases he faces while juggling his presidential campaign.

The former president faces at least 88 charges over the four criminal indictments in Georgia, New York, Washington, DC, and Florida. Trump has pleaded not guilty to every charge in these cases. 

Here’s a recap of each case: 

  • Hush money: Trump was first indicted in March 2023 by the Manhattan district attorney on state charges related to a hush-money payment to an adult film star in 2016. Prosecutors allege Trump was part of an illegal conspiracy to undermine the integrity of the 2016 election. Further, they allege he was part of an unlawful plan to suppress negative information, including the $130,000 payment. 
  • Classified documents: Trump was indicted in June 2023 by a federal grand jury in Miami for taking classified national defense documents from the White House after he left office and resisting the government’s attempts to retrieve the materials. The National Archives said in early 2022 that at least 15 boxes of White House records were recovered from the estate, including some that were classified. The charges were brought by special counsel Jack Smith. However, Judge Aileen Cannon has indefinitely postponed the trial, citing significant issues around classified evidence that would need to be worked out before the federal criminal case goes to a jury.
  • Federal election interference: Smith separately charged the former president last August with four crimes over his efforts to reverse the 2020 election results. The indictment alleges Trump and a co-conspirator “attempted to exploit the violence and chaos at the Capitol by calling lawmakers to convince them … to delay the certification” of the election. That case is currently on hold as the Supreme Court weighs Trump’s claims of presidential immunity in the matter. The court held a hearing on the issue of immunity in late April. Every day the court doesn’t issue a decision will play into Trump’s strategy of delay, jeopardizing the likelihood that Smith can bring his case to trial before the November election. 
  • Fulton County: State prosecutors in Georgia brought a similar election subversion case against Trump and others. An Atlanta-based grand jury on August 14, 2023, indicted Trump and 18 others on state charges stemming from their alleged efforts to overturn the former president’s 2020 electoral defeat. A trial date has not yet been set in that case. 

Read more about the four criminal cases Trump faces. 

Where we are in the trial

Former President Donald Trump’s first criminal trial is expected to take six to eight weeks, from start to finish.

Where we are in the trial: Prosecutors are presenting evidence through witness testimony and exhibits. Defense attorneys can cross-examine the prosecution’s witnesses and typically aim to discredit their testimony.

Prosecutors told Judge Juan Merchan on Monday that they have roughly two weeks left of testimony in their case.  

Read up on the stages of the proceedings here.

Some of the key dates to know in Donald Trump's hush money case

Prosecutors are trying to prove that Donald Trump falsified business records to cover up hush money payments made to prevent adult film star Stormy Daniel’s claim of an affair with Trump from becoming public before the 2016 presidential election. 

Here’s a timeline CNN compiled of key events in the case:

  • August 2015: Trump meets with then-American Media Inc. CEO David Pecker at Trump Tower, prosecutors say, where Pecker agrees to be the “eyes and ears” for Trump’s campaign and flag any negative stories to Trump’s then-fixer Michael Cohen.
  • September 2016: Trump discusses a $150,000 hush money payment understood to be for former Playboy model Karen McDougal with Michael Cohen, who secretly records the conversation. McDougal has alleged she had an extramarital affair with Trump beginning in 2006, which he has denied. 
  • October 7, 2016: The Washington Post releases an “Access Hollywood” video from 2005 in which Trump uses vulgar language to describe his sexual approach to women with show host Billy Bush. 
  • October 27, 2016: According to prosecutors, Cohen pays Daniels $130,000 through her attorney via a shell company in exchange for her silence about an affair she allegedly had with Trump in 2006. This $130,000 sum is separate from the $150,000 paid to McDougal. Trump has publicly denied having any affairs and has denied making the payments. 
  • November 8, 2016: Trump secures the election to become the 45th President of the United States. 
  • February 2017: Prosecutors say Cohen meets with Trump in the Oval Office to confirm how he would be reimbursed for the hush money payment Cohen fronted to Daniels. Under the plan, Cohen would send a series of false invoices requesting payment for legal services he performed pursuant to a retainer agreement and receive monthly checks for $35,000 for a total of $420,000 to cover the payment, his taxes and a bonus, prosecutors alleged. Prosecutors also allege there was never a retainer agreement. 
  • January 2018: The Wall Street Journal breaks news about the hush money payment Cohen made to Daniels in 2016. 

See a full timeline and read up on the key players in the case below:

The judge denied effort to amend gag order yesterday. Here's what it does

Here’s what to know about the gag order imposed on Donald Trump by Judge Juan Merchan in late March: 

Why was it imposed? Merchan implemented the gag order because, he said, the former president has a history of making “threatening, inflammatory, denigrating” statements against people at all levels of the justice system, including jurors. According to CNN senior legal analyst Elie Honig, the fundamental reason for the gag order is to protect members of the jury. 

What does it do? The ruling limits the former president from making statements about potential witnesses in his hush money criminal trial. It prevents Trump from criticizing his former attorney, Michael Cohen, who has yet to testify, or adult film star Stormy Daniels, who was a witness this week. But it does not prevent Trump from talking about New York District Attorney Alvin Bragg, who is a public figure, or Merchan himself. 

Merchan also ruled that Trump can’t make statements about attorneys, court staff or the family members of prosecutors, lawyers, family members of the court and family members of the Manhattan district attorney. Trump is also barred from making statements about any potential or actual juror. 

What does Trump say? Trump and his attorneys have argued that as the leading Republican candidate for president, Trump’s speech should not be restricted as he appeals to voters in the 2024 election. Merchan has already fined Trump and held him in contempt of court for violating the order.

Trump's lawyers have been trying to discredit the prosecution's witnesses. Here's who's on the defense

Trump attorney Todd Blanche speaks during court on Tuesday, May 7.

Donald Trump’s legal team is led by Todd Blanche and Emil Bove, two former federal prosecutors from New York, and Susan Necheles, a veteran criminal defense lawyer with deep experience in New York and with appearing before Judge Juan Merchan.

Here are the key things to know about Trump’s legal team:

  • Bove was the co-chief of the national security unit at the US attorney’s office for the Southern District of New York. In a statement to CNN in September 2023, Blanche said that Bove is “an expert in white collar and CIPA-related litigation.”
  • Blanche has worked as a prosecutor and defense attorney at two large law firms, according to his website. He says that during his career as a defense attorney, he got the criminal indictment against Trump’s 2016 campaign chairman Paul Manafort dismissed prior to trial and achieved an “unexpectedly positive result in the politically charged prosecution by the SDNY against Igor Fruman, an associate of Rudy Giuliani.” Fruman was sentenced to one year and one day in prison for his role in a scheme to funnel Russian money into US elections.
  • Necheles represented Trump’s business at its tax fraud trial in 2022. The company was convicted. 
  • Kendra Wharton, a white collar defense lawyer who has experience practicing in Washington, DC, was added to the former president’s legal team. She is a “brilliant lawyer” and “clients have trusted her for years,” Blanche said in the 2023 statement.