Use of Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems and Age of Asthma Onset Among US Adults and Youths | Pulmonary Medicine | JAMA Network Open | JAMA Network
[Skip to Navigation]
Sign In
Figure.  Age of Asthma Onset Among Participants Who Did Not Have Asthma or Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Never Used Cigarettes at the First Wave of Participation in the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study, 2013-2021
Age of Asthma Onset Among Participants Who Did Not Have Asthma or Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Never Used Cigarettes at the First Wave of Participation in the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study, 2013-2021

The cumulative hazard function is shown for adults (A) and youths (B).

Table 1.  Demographic and Measure Characteristics of Adults and Youth That Reported Not Having Asthma or Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Never Using Cigarettes in the PATH Study (2013-2020) at the First Wave of Participationa
Demographic and Measure Characteristics of Adults and Youth That Reported Not Having Asthma or Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Never Using Cigarettes in the PATH Study (2013-2020) at the First Wave of Participationa
Table 2.  Association of Past 30-Day ENDS Use With the Age of Asthma Onset Among the 7766 Adults Who Did Not Have Asthma or Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Free and Never Used Cigarettes at the First Wave of Participation in the PATH Study, 2013-2021a
Association of Past 30-Day ENDS Use With the Age of Asthma Onset Among the 7766 Adults Who Did Not Have Asthma or Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Free and Never Used Cigarettes at the First Wave of Participation in the PATH Study, 2013-2021a
Table 3.  Association of Past 30-Day ENDS Use With the Age of Asthma Onset Among the 17 023 Youths Who Did Not Have Asthma and Never Used Cigarettes at the First Wave of Participation in the PATH Study, 2013-2021a
Association of Past 30-Day ENDS Use With the Age of Asthma Onset Among the 17 023 Youths Who Did Not Have Asthma and Never Used Cigarettes at the First Wave of Participation in the PATH Study, 2013-2021a
1.
Asthma and Allergy Foundation of America. Asthma facts and figures. April 2022. Updated September 2023. Accessed September 11, 2023. https://www.aafa.org/asthma-facts/.
2.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Table 2-1 Lifetime asthma prevalence percents by age, United States: National Health Interview survey, 2019. Updated December 26, 2020. Accessed September 15, 2021. https://www.cdc.gov/asthma/nhis/2019/table2-1.htm
3.
Cairns  V, Keil  U, Kleinbaum  D, Doering  A, Stieber  J.  Alcohol consumption as a risk factor for high blood pressure: Munich Blood Pressure Study.   Hypertension. 1984;6(1):124-131. doi:10.1161/01.HYP.6.1.124PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
4.
Nurmagambetov  T, Kuwahara  R, Garbe  P.  The economic burden of asthma in the United States, 2008-2013.   Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2018;15(3):348-356. doi:10.1513/AnnalsATS.201703-259OCPubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
5.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).  Current cigarette smoking prevalence among working adults–United States, 2004-2010.   MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2011;60(38):1305-1309.PubMedGoogle Scholar
6.
Yaghoubi  M, Adibi  A, Safari  A, FitzGerald  JM, Sadatsafavi  M.  The projected economic and health burden of uncontrolled asthma in the United States.   Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019;200(9):1102-1112. doi:10.1164/rccm.201901-0016OCPubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
7.
Gwynn  RC.  Risk factors for asthma in US adults: results from the 2000 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System.   J Asthma. 2004;41(1):91-98. doi:10.1081/JAS-120026066PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
8.
Cornelius  ME, Loretan  CG, Jamal  A,  et al.  Tobacco product use among adults - United States, 2021.   MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2023;72(18):475-483. doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm7218a1PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
9.
Park-Lee  E, Ren  C, Cooper  M, Cornelius  M, Jamal  A, Cullen  KA.  Tobacco product use among middle and high school students - United States, 2022.   MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2022;71(45):1429-1435. doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm7145a1PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
10.
Cooper  M, Park-Lee  E, Ren  C, Cornelius  M, Jamal  A, Cullen  KA.  Notes from the field: e-cigarette use among middle and high school students - United States, 2022.   MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2022;71(40):1283-1285. doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm7140a3PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
11.
Park  HR, O’Sullivan  M, Vallarino  J,  et al.  Transcriptomic response of primary human airway epithelial cells to flavoring chemicals in electronic cigarettes.   Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):1400. doi:10.1038/s41598-018-37913-9PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
12.
Chang  CM, Edwards  SH, Arab  A, Del Valle-Pinero  AY, Yang  L, Hatsukami  DK.  Biomarkers of tobacco exposure: Summary of an FDA-sponsored public workshop.   Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2017;26(3):291-302. doi:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-16-0675PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
13.
Esteban-Lopez  M, Perry  MD, Garbinski  LD,  et al.  Health effects and known pathology associated with the use of E-cigarettes.   Toxicol Rep. 2022;9:1357-1368. doi:10.1016/j.toxrep.2022.06.006PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
14.
Farber  HJ, Conrado Pacheco Gallego  M, Galiatsatos  P, Folan  P, Lamphere  T, Pakhale  S.  Harms of electronic cigarettes: what the healthcare provider needs to know.   Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2021;18(4):567-572. doi:10.1513/AnnalsATS.202009-1113CMEPubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
15.
Wold  LE, Tarran  R, Crotty Alexander  LE,  et al; American Heart Association Council on Basic Cardiovascular Sciences; Council on Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis and Vascular Biology; Council on Hypertension; and Stroke Council.  Cardiopulmonary consequences of vaping in adolescents: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association.   Circ Res. 2022;131(3):e70-e82. doi:10.1161/RES.0000000000000544PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
16.
Eagan  TM, Brøgger  JC, Eide  GE, Bakke  PS.  The incidence of adult asthma: a review.   Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2005;9(6):603-612.PubMedGoogle Scholar
17.
Loftus  PA, Wise  SK.  Epidemiology of asthma.   Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016;24(3):245-249. doi:10.1097/MOO.0000000000000262PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
18.
Viegi  G, Maio  S, Fasola  S, Baldacci  S.  Global Burden of chronic respiratory diseases.   J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv. 2020;33(4):171-177. doi:10.1089/jamp.2019.1576PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
19.
Grabenhenrich  LB, Gough  H, Reich  A,  et al.  Early-life determinants of asthma from birth to age 20 years: a German birth cohort study.   J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014;133(4):979-988. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2013.11.035PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
20.
De Marco  R, Locatelli  F, Cerveri  I, Bugiani  M, Marinoni  A, Giammanco  G; Italian Study on Asthma in Young Adults study group.  Incidence and remission of asthma: a retrospective study on the natural history of asthma in Italy.   J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2002;110(2):228-235. doi:10.1067/mai.2002.125600PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
21.
Walker  CJ, Christian  WJ.  Estimating the population attributable fraction of asthma due to electronic cigarette use and other risk factors using Kentucky behavioral risk factor survey data, 2016-2017.   Subst Use Misuse. 2021;56(3):353-358. doi:10.1080/10826084.2020.1868002PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
22.
Bircan  E, Bezirhan  U, Porter  A, Fagan  P, Orloff  MS.  Erratum: Electronic cigarette use and its association with asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma-COPD overlap syndrome among never cigarette smokers.   Tob Induc Dis. 2021;19:74. doi:10.18332/tid/142579PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
23.
Li  X, Zhang  Y, Zhang  R, Chen  F, Shao  L, Zhang  L.  Association between e-cigarettes and asthma in adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis.   Am J Prev Med. 2022;62(6):953-960. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2022.01.015PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
24.
Roh  T, Uyamasi  K, Aggarwal  A, Obeng  A, Carrillo  G.  Association between e-cigarette use and asthma among US adolescents: Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System 2015-2019.   Prev Med. 2023;175:107695. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2023.107695PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
25.
Brunette  MF, Halenar  MJ, Edwards  KC,  et al.  Association between tobacco product use and asthma among US adults from the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) study waves 2-4.   BMJ Open Respir Res. 2023;10(1):e001187. doi:10.1136/bmjresp-2021-001187PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
26.
Mattingly  DT, Cook  S, Hirschtick  JL,  et al.  Longitudinal associations between exclusive, dual, and polytobacco use and asthma among US youth.   Prev Med. 2023;171:107512. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2023.107512PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
27.
von Elm  E, Altman  DG, Egger  M, Pocock  SJ, Gøtzsche  PC, Vandenbroucke  JP; STROBE Initiative.  The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.   J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61(4):344-349. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.11.008PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
28.
United States Department of Health Human Services Food and Drug Administration, National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Drug Abuse, Center for Tobacco Products. Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) study [United States] restricted-use files. [ICPSR 36231. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program. October 4, 2023. Accessed April 1, 2024. https://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/NAHDAP/studies/36231
29.
Hyland  A, Ambrose  BK, Conway  KP,  et al.  Design and methods of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study.   Tob Control. 2017;26(4):371-378. doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-052934PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
30.
Lieberoth  S, Backer  V, Kyvik  KO,  et al.  Intake of alcohol and risk of adult-onset asthma.   Respir Med. 2012;106(2):184-188. doi:10.1016/j.rmed.2011.11.004PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
31.
Wills  TA, Choi  K, Pagano  I.  E-cigarette use associated with asthma independent of cigarette smoking and marijuana in a 2017 national sample of adolescents.   J Adolesc Health. 2020;67(4):524-530. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.03.001PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
32.
Burke  H, Leonardi-Bee  J, Hashim  A,  et al.  Prenatal and passive smoke exposure and incidence of asthma and wheeze: systematic review and meta-analysis.   Pediatrics. 2012;129(4):735-744. doi:10.1542/peds.2011-2196PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
33.
Tinuoye  O, Pell  JP, Mackay  DF.  Meta-analysis of the association between secondhand smoke exposure and physician-diagnosed childhood asthma.   Nicotine Tob Res. 2013;15(9):1475-1483. doi:10.1093/ntr/ntt033PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
34.
Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Overweight and obesity. Updated September 21, 2023. Accessed April 1, 2024. https://www.cdc.gov/obesity/index.html
35.
Klein  JP, Moeschberger  ML.  Survival analysis: techniques for censored and truncated data. Springer Science & Business Media; 2006.
36.
Goodall  RL, Dunn  DT, Babiker  AG.  Interval-censored survival time data: confidence intervals for the non-parametric survivor function.   Stat Med. 2004;23(7):1131-1145. doi:10.1002/sim.1682PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
37.
Betensky  RA, Rabinowitz  D, Tsiatis  AA.  Computationally simple accelerated failure time regression for interval censored data.   Biometrika. 2001;88(3):703-711. doi:10.1093/biomet/88.3.703Google ScholarCrossref
38.
Finkelstein  DM.  A proportional hazards model for interval-censored failure time data.   Biometrics. 1986;42(4):845-854. doi:10.2307/2530698PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
39.
Royston  P, Parmar  MK.  Flexible parametric proportional-hazards and proportional-odds models for censored survival data, with application to prognostic modelling and estimation of treatment effects.   Stat Med. 2002;21(15):2175-2197. doi:10.1002/sim.1203PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
40.
Ibrahim  JG, Chen  MH, Sinha  D.  Bayesian Survival Analysis. Springer; 2001.
41.
Collett  D.  Modelling Survival Data in Medical Research. 4th ed. Chapman & Hall; 2023.
42.
Sargent  JD, Halenar  MJ, Edwards  KC,  et al.  Tobacco use and respiratory symptoms among adults: findings from the longitudinal Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) study 2014-2016.   Nicotine Tob Res. 2022;24(10):1607-1618. doi:10.1093/ntr/ntac080PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
43.
Forno  E, Celedon  JC.  Asthma and ethnic minorities: socioeconomic status and beyond.   Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009;9(2):154-160. doi:10.1097/ACI.0b013e3283292207PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
44.
Hosseini  B, Berthon  BS, Wark  P, Wood  LG.  Effects of fruit and vegetable consumption on risk of asthma, wheezing and immune responses: a systematic review and meta-analysis.   Nutrients. 2017;9(4):341. doi:10.3390/nu9040341PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
45.
Ndanuko  RN, Tapsell  LC, Charlton  KE, Neale  EP, Batterham  MJ.  Dietary patterns and blood pressure in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.   Adv Nutr. 2016;7(1):76-89. doi:10.3945/an.115.009753PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
46.
Neuman  Å, Hohmann  C, Orsini  N,  et al; ENRIECO Consortium.  Maternal smoking in pregnancy and asthma in preschool children: a pooled analysis of eight birth cohorts.   Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012;186(10):1037-1043. doi:10.1164/rccm.201203-0501OCPubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
47.
Kuruvilla  ME, Vanijcharoenkarn  K, Shih  JA, Lee  FEH.  Epidemiology and risk factors for asthma.   Respir Med. 2019;149:16-22. doi:10.1016/j.rmed.2019.01.014PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
48.
Pettigrew  MM, Gent  JF, Zhu  Y,  et al.  Respiratory symptoms among infants at risk for asthma: association with surfactant protein A haplotypes.   BMC Med Genet. 2007;8:15. doi:10.1186/1471-2350-8-15PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
49.
Mirabelli  MC, Hsu  J, Gower  WA.  Comorbidities of asthma in U.S. children.   Respir Med. 2016;116:34-40. doi:10.1016/j.rmed.2016.05.008PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
50.
Platts-Mills  TA, Erwin  EA, Heymann  PW, Woodfolk  JA.  Pro: the evidence for a causal role of dust mites in asthma.   Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2009;180(2):109-113. doi:10.1164/rccm.200811-1756PRPubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
51.
Liu  T, Valdez  R, Yoon  PW, Crocker  D, Moonesinghe  R, Khoury  MJ.  The association between family history of asthma and the prevalence of asthma among US adults: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999-2004.   Genet Med. 2009;11(5):323-328. doi:10.1097/GIM.0b013e31819d3015PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
52.
Wang  SB, Huang  T.  The early detection of asthma based on blood gene expression.   Mol Biol Rep. 2019;46(1):217-223. doi:10.1007/s11033-018-4463-6PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Original Investigation
Pulmonary Medicine
May 17, 2024

Use of Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems and Age of Asthma Onset Among US Adults and Youths

Author Affiliations
  • 1Department of Biostatistics and Data Science, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, School of Public Health, Austin
  • 2Michael and Susan Dell Center for Healthy Living, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, School of Public Health, Austin
  • 3Division of Pulmonary and Sleep Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, School of Medicine, Houston
  • 4Department of Epidemiology, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, School of Public Health, Austin
JAMA Netw Open. 2024;7(5):e2410740. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.10740
Key Points

Question  Is the use of electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) in the past 30 days associated with the age of asthma onset among adults (≥18 years) and youths (12-17 years) who never used cigarettes?

Findings  This cohort study of 7766 adults and 17 023 youths from the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study (2013-2021) found that adults who used ENDS in the past 30-days had an increased risk for asthma incidence at earlier ages vs adults who did not use ENDS in the past 30 days. This finding did not hold for youths.

Meaning  These findings suggest that tobacco regulations, prevention, intervention campaigns, and cessation programs are needed to prevent early age of asthma onset among adults who use ENDS, to protect public health, and to help improve asthma screening guidelines.

Abstract

Importance  The association of use of electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) with the age of asthma onset is unknown.

Objective  To explore the association of past 30-day ENDS use with the age of asthma onset in adults and youths who did not have asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and never used cigarettes.

Design, Setting, and Participants  This cohort study was a secondary analysis of waves 1 to 6 of the US nationally representative Population of Tobacco and Health Study (2013-2021). Eligible participants included adults (≥18 years) and youths (12-17 years) who did not have asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease at the first wave of participation. Data analysis was conducted from September 2022 to April 2024.

Exposure  Past 30-day ENDS use at the first wave of participation in the study preceding the onset of asthma.

Main outcome and measures  Lower and upper age limits were estimated using the age reported at the first wave of participation and the number of weeks between follow-up waves until asthma was first reported or censored. The association of past 30-day ENDS use with the age of asthma onset was estimated using weighted interval-censoring Cox regression. The cumulative hazard function for the age of asthma onset was estimated using interval-censoring survival analysis.

Results  A total of 24 789 participants were included, with 7766 adults (4461 female [weighted percentage, 59.11%] and 3305 male [weighted percentage, 40.89%]), representing 80.0 million adults, and 17 023 youths (8514 female [weighted percentage, 50.60%] and 8496 male [weighted percentage 49.32%]), representing 33.9 million youths. By age 27 years, 6.2 per 1000 adults reported asthma incidence (hazard ratio [HR], 0.62%; 95% CI, 0.46%-0.75%). While controlling for covariates, there was a 252% increased risk of the onset of asthma at earlier ages for adults who used ENDS in the past 30 days vs adults who did not (adjusted HR, 3.52; 95% CI, 1.24-10.02). For youths, there was no association of ENDS use in the past 30 days with age of asthma onset (adjusted HR, 1.79; 95% CI, 0.67-4.77), which could be due to a lack of statistical power.

Conclusion and relevance  In this cohort study, past 30-day ENDS use among adults was associated with earlier ages of asthma onset. These findings suggest that prevention and cessation programs directed to adults who use ENDS are needed to educate the public, protect public health, prevent adverse health outcomes, and motivate users to stop. Furthermore, modifying symptom-screening asthma guidelines, resulting in earlier asthma detection and treatment, may reduce morbidity and mortality due to asthma.

Introduction

Asthma is one of the most prevalent respiratory diseases, affecting more than 27 million people in the US (8.4% of adults aged ≥18 years and 5.8% of youths aged 12-17 years).1,2 The number of US emergency department visits in 2021 attributable to asthma without chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) was approximately 939 000 (SE, 149 000), which was 0.7% of all emergency department visits in 2021.3 Asthma is one of the most costly diseases, resulting in $300 billion annually in losses due to missed school or work days, mortality, and medical costs,4,5 and an estimated total burden of $963.1 billion annually.6

Cigarette or combustible product use is associated with increased risk for the onset of asthma.7 Electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS; ie, vapes, vaporizers, vape pens, hookah pens, electronic cigarettes [e-cigarettes], and/or electronic pipes [e-pipes]) are highly popular in the US. A nationally representative study8 found that in 2021 (most recent data available), among adults aged 18 years or older, the prevalence of ENDS use every day or some days was 4.5% (representing 11.1 million adults), with men reporting higher prevalence of ENDS use (5.1%) in comparison with women (4.0%). In 2022, among middle and high school students, the prevalence of past 30-day (P30D) ENDS use was 9.4% (2.55 million students), and the prevalence of P30D ENDS use was 5.2% among non-Hispanic White students, 2.4% among non-Hispanic Black or African American students, 3.3% among Hispanic students, 2.9% among non-Hispanic Asian students, 8.9% among non-Hispanic students of other races and ethnicities (eg, non-Hispanic American Indian or Alaska Native, multiracial individuals, and any other race or ethnicity).9,10 Harmful chemical ingredients found in ENDS have been found to affect pulmonary function11 and may have the potential to affect respiratory health.12-15 Previous studies have examined the differences by biological sex of the age of asthma onset in adults16-18 and youths,19,20 but not with recent data. Several studies,21-24 but not all,25,26 have reported that ENDS use is associated with increased risk of asthma in adults21,22 and youths23,24 after controlling for other tobacco product (TP) use. While these studies have merit, there is a substantial gap in the field because prior studies have not examined the age of asthma onset with recent data or the association of P30D ENDS use with age of asthma onset for adults and for youths. Quantifying the potential risk of earlier asthma onset due to P30D ENDS use can help prevent people from initiating use or motivate them to stop.

Methods
Study Design and Included Participants

This cohort study was approved by the Committee for the Protection of Human Subjects at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston and follows the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) reporting guidelines for cohort studies.27 Secondary longitudinal data analysis of restricted data sets28 (waves 1-6) of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study29 were conducted. This study is a nationally representative, longitudinal cohort study that was designed to measure tobacco use behaviors and how they affect the health of adults (aged ≥18 years) and youths (aged 12-17 years) in the US using a complex design.29 Wave 1 was collected in 2013 to 2014, wave 2 in 2014 to 2015, wave 3 in 2015 to 2016, wave 4 in 2016 to 2017, wave 4.5 in 2017 to 2018, wave 5 in 2018 to 2019, wave 5.5 in 2019 to 2020, and wave 6 in 2020 to 2021. The sample size of the wave 1 cohort was 32 320 adults and 13 651 youths.28 After wave 3, the PATH Study added a new cohort of participants, including 6065 adults and 3739 youths due to attrition that was referred as the wave 4 cohort.28After wave 4, adults were followed-up every 2 years, but youths were followed-up annually. Youths from the wave 1 and wave 4 cohorts were measured in 2017 and 2018 as wave 4.5. In addition, at wave 1, a shadow youth sample of 9- to 11-year-olds was collected to replenish the 12- to 17-year-olds who became adults (ie, turned 18 years of age) in waves 2 to 5.5. There were 2091 shadow youths who entered the study at wave 2, 2045 at wave 3, 1694 at wave 4, 1753 at wave 4.5, 1652 at wave 5, and 53 at wave 5.5.28 There were 1915 youths who turned 18 in wave 1 and participated in the adult survey at wave 2, 1907 who turned 18 in wave 2 and participated in the adult survey at wave 3, 1900 who turned 18 in wave 3 and participated in the adult survey at wave 4, 4443 who turned 18 in wave 4 and participated in the adult survey at wave 5, 2614 who turned 18 in wave 5 and participated in the adult survey at wave 5.5, and 53 who turned 18 in wave 5.5 and participated in the adult survey at wave 6.28 Adults older than 20 years in 2020 were measured using an adult telephone survey and their data were also included to evaluate the age of asthma onset. The analysis included adults who entered the PATH study at wave 1 and wave 4; these cohorts were tracked longitudinally across waves after entry.28 Similarly, the analysis for youths included those who entered the PATH study at wave 1 and wave 4. In addition, shadow youths who entered at each wave (as replacements) were appended to these cohorts. Finally, wave 1, wave 4, and shadow youths who turned 18 at any wave were invited to complete the adult measurements thereafter and were tracked longitudinally.28 The reasons for excluding participants and number and percentage of participants excluded or included in these analyses are detailed in eTable 1 in Supplement 1. All youth participants provided informed written assent and parents provided informed written consent for youths. Adult participants provided informed written consent.

Measures
Asthma and COPD Assessment

Adult participants were asked at their first wave of adult participation (waves 1-6), “Has a doctor or other health professional ever told you that you had [asthma] [COPD]?” Adults who answered no at their first wave of adult participation were asked about asthma diagnosis in the past 12 months in waves 2 through 6. Parents of youths participated in the study to enhance the accuracy of some questions. At the youths’ first wave of study participation, parents of youths were asked, “Has [Child] ever been told by a doctor or other health professional that [he/she] has asthma?” COPD was not measured in youths. Youths with no asthma at their first wave of study participation (waves 1-5.5) were asked about asthma diagnosis in the past 12 months in waves 2 to 6. Age of asthma onset was estimated using waves 2 to 6 (includes waves 4.5 [youths only], 5.5 [youths and adults], and the adult telephone survey [adults only]).

P30D ENDS Use

In waves 1 and 2, P30D ENDS use was measured with the question, “In the past 30 days, have you used an e-cigarette, even one or two times?” and in waves 3 to 5.5 with the question, “In the past 30 days, have you used an electronic nicotine product, even one or two times? Electronic nicotine products include e-cigarettes, vape pens, personal vaporizers and mods, e-cigars, e-pipes, e-hookahs, and hookah pens,” assuming they were the same construct. P30D ENDS use was estimated at the first wave of participation (2013-2020), which happened before asthma incidence (2014-2021).

Covariates at First Wave of Participation

The PATH Study imputed sex, race, and Hispanic ethnicity using the household information.28 Adults self-reported their sex, race, and Hispanic ethnicity and parents reported sex, race, and Hispanic ethnicity for youths. Race was categorized as Asian, Black, White, and other race (ie, multiracial and any other race not otherwise specified). Ethnicity was categorized as either Hispanic or non-Hispanic. Answers to race and ethnicity questions were combined to create race and ethnicity categories including Hispanic, non-Hispanic Black, non-Hispanic White, and other (non-Hispanic Asian, multiracial, and any other race or ethnicity not otherwise specified). Race and ethnicity were included to account for disparities. Other covariates included adults’ education or education of youths’ parents (collapsed as less than high school, high school or general education development test, some college or associate’s degree, and bachelor’s degree or higher), binge drinking (male adults, ≥5 drinks; female adults, ≥4 drinks; boys aged 9-13 years, ≥3 drinks; boys aged 14-15 years, ≥4 drinks; boys aged 16-17 years, ≥5 drinks; girls, ≥3 drinks, each one in a single sit),30 ever using marijuana,31 total number of years that a participant reported ENDS use (subtraction of the age when the participant first reported using ENDS from the age at the first wave of participation), participant’s P30D use of other TP (eg, filtered cigars, traditional cigars, cigarillos, hookah, and smokeless tobacco), total number of waves of emergent cigarette use prior to asthma onset, any person who uses TPs present at home,32 rules at home about any TP use (never allowed vs allowed anywhere, sometimes, or anytime),33 and weight status.34

Age of Asthma Onset Estimation

Because the exact date of asthma onset was not assessed and the participants’ birthdays were not provided, the age at the first wave of study participation and the number of weeks between survey dates were used to estimate the age of asthma onset prospectively. Lower and upper age bounds for asthma onset were estimated for the time-to-event analyses. The lower age bound was the age at the last wave where participants did not report asthma and the upper age bound was age at the wave that participant reported asthma incidence. Participants who reported no asthma in waves 1 to 6 were censored. The age of asthma onset was estimated to occur between the lower and upper age bounds in all participants.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was conducted from September 2022 to April 2024. All statistical analyses incorporated the use of sampling weights and 100 balance repeated replicate weights at the first wave of study participation with the Fay adjustment set to 0.3.28 Weighted summary statistics were reported to describe sociodemographic characteristics, prevalence of P30D ENDS use, other TP use, and other covariates at participants’ first wave of study participation. The median follow-up time was estimated by adding the number of weeks between the first wave of participation and (1) the first wave of asthma onset or (2) the last wave of participation (waves 2-6) for censored participants. For participants who were lost to follow-up from the first wave of participation to wave 6, a week of participation was assumed to estimate the median follow-up time. Weighted interval-censoring survival analyses were implemented for adults and youths to estimate the age of asthma onset and are presented as graphs.35-38 The association of P30D ENDS use with the age of asthma onset was explored by fitting weighted interval-censoring Cox proportional hazards models using cubic splines (3 knots)39,40 as the baseline hazard function.41 Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs were reported. Sociodemographic characteristics and other TP use were included in final models regardless of significance. Three models were fit. Model 1 included covariates with a 2-sided P value < .20 in the univariate analysis. Model 2 removed covariates that were not significant from model 1. Model 3 included the covariates in model 2, total number of years that a participant reported ENDS use, and ever marijuana use. The threshold for statistical significance for models 2 and 3 was a type I error level of .05. Statistical analyses were conducted in SAS version 9.4-TSlevel1M6 (SAS Institute).

One sensitivity analysis was conducted for adults and youths who reported not having asthma or COPD regardless of their TP use. For the sensitivity analyses, the reasons for exclusion and number and percentage of participants excluded or included are detailed in eTable 2 in Supplement 1. Combustible TP use (ie, never, former, and P30D) and P30D ENDS use were combined in 6 mutually exclusive categories using the never use category of combustible TP and no P30D ENDS use as the reference category (P30D combustible TP use and P30D ENDS use status). At the first wave of participation, the lifetime pack-years of cigarette use was estimated using the same methodology as in previous publications42 as a potential covariate. Only models 1 and 2 were fitted.

Results

The total sample size for analysis was 24 789 at first wave of participation and included 7766 adults (4461 female [weighted percentage, 59.11%] and 3305 male [weighted percentage, 40.89%]), representing approximately 80.0 million adults, and 17 023 youths (8514 female [weighted percentage, 50.60%] and 8496 male [weighted percentage 49.32%]), representing approximately 33.9 million youths. Table 1 shows the demographic characteristics of adults and youths that did not have asthma or COPD and who never used cigarettes at their first wave of participation. Among adults, 1765 were Hispanic (weighted percentage, 19.62%), 1534 were non-Hispanic Black (weighted percentage, 14.42%), 3712 were non-Hispanic White (weighted percentage, 54.19%), and 755 were other race or ethnicity (weighted percentage, 11.77%). Among youths, 4944 were Hispanic (weighted percentage, 23.67%), 2128 were non-Hispanic Black (12.76%), 8334 were non-Hispanic White (weighted percentage, 52.95%), and 1584 were other race or ethnicity (weighted percentage 10.40%). The median (SE) follow-up time in the study was 4.94 (0.06) years among adults and 4.19 (0.04) years among youths.

The Figure shows the distribution of the estimated age of asthma onset. We found that among adults who did not have asthma or COPD and who never used cigarettes, 6.2 per 1000 adults reported incidence of asthma by age 27 years (HR, 0.62%; 95% CI, 0.46%-0.75%). By age 35 years, 10.8 per 1000 adults reported incidence of asthma (HR, 1.08%; 95% CI, 0.82%-1.42%), and by age 55 years, 25.8 per 1000 adults reported incidence of asthma (HR, 2.58%; 95% CI, 2.09%-3.24%). Also, we found that 22.3 per 1000 youths reported incidence of asthma by age 15 years (HR, 2.23%; 95% CI, 1.88%-2.45%) and 79.6 per 1000 youths reported incidence of asthma by age 20 years (HR, 7.96%; 95% CI, 7.31%-8.61%).

Table 2 shows the crude and adjusted Cox proportional hazard models for adults. Model 1 shows that after adjusting for covariates, adults who with P30D ENDS use were at a 252% increased risk of asthma onset at earlier ages compared with adults who reported no P30D ENDS use (HR 3.52, 95% CI 1.24-10.02). When reducing the number of covariates in models 2 and 3, the results were similar.

Table 3 shows the crude and adjusted Cox proportional hazard models for youths. Model 1 shows that while adjusting for covariates, there was no association of P30D ENDS use with the age of asthma onset (HR, 1.79; 95% CI, 0.67-4.77). When reducing the number of covariates in models 2 and 3, the results were similar. The sensitivity analyses are reported in eTable 3, eTable 4, eTable 5, and the eFigure in Supplement 1. In model 2, when compared with adults who reported never using combustible TP and no P30D ENDS use, adults who reported P30D use of any combustible TP and no P30D ENDS use had a 69% increased risk of earlier ages of asthma onset (HR, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.25-2.29) and adults who reported P30D use of any combustible TP and P30D ENDS use had a 143% increased risk of earlier ages of asthma onset (HR, 2.43; 95% CI 1.71-3.34) ( eTable 4 in Supplement 1). There was no association of the interaction between the P30D use of any combustible TP and P30D ENDS use with the age of asthma onset among youths (eTable 5 in Supplement 1).

Discussion

This cohort study is the first study, to our knowledge, to prospectively estimate the age of asthma onset among adults and youths who never used cigarettes and did not have asthma or COPD at the first wave of participation using interval-censoring survival analyses in a US representative sample. The incidence of asthma onset in adults did not decrease with increasing age. The change in the hazard function increased sharply among those aged older than 60 years. This finding is consistent with a 2005 review16 that reported a pooled estimate (including prospective cohorts from Arizona, Michigan, Norway, Sweden, Spain, Poland, Finland, and Denmark) of the adult incidence of asthma as 5.9 per 1000 women (95% CI, 4.4-7.8) and 4.4 per 1000 men (95% CI, 3.1-6.2). These pooled estimates included US data from 1959 to 1996 and are the most recent incidence studies found. Our estimates provide up-to-date information through 2021. Pooled estimates of 29 centers from 14 countries from the European Community Respiratory Health Survey16 between 1991 and 2002 reported the adult incidence of asthma by age 35 years as 4.42 (95% CI, 3.22-5.62) per 1000 women and 1.59 (95% CI 0.83-2.34) per 1000 men. Our study included adults who reported never, former, and current P30D cigarette use. We reported the hazard function for the age of onset by age 35 years as 10.8 per 1000 adults, which is almost 2.5 times higher than European countries and twice higher than earlier data from the US.16 In youths (those without asthma and those who never used cigarettes), the distribution of the hazard function showed an inflection point at 18 years, which is similar to an observed inflection point on the age of asthma onset seen at 16 years among German youths between 1990 and 2010.19 These German children were selected from obstetric departments that were followed up from birth for 20 years with an incidence of asthma of 13.4 per 1000 youths,19 which is lower than the 79.6 per 1000 youths in our study. Our results are consistent with previous reports17,18 indicating that asthma is increasing in the US and worldwide.

Our results showed that adults who reported never using cigarettes, not having asthma or COPD, and P30D ENDS use at the first wave of participation had increased risk of asthma incidence at earlier ages in comparison with adults who reported no P30D ENDS use. Our sensitivity analysis among adults who did not have asthma or COPD showed a dose response association of P30D tobacco use with earlier age of asthma onset. These findings are in contrast with a 2014 to 2015 study25 that started with adults without asthma aged 18 to 39 years and found that use of P30D ENDS or P30D use of any combustible product was not associated with asthma incidence 1 or 2 years later.

While a cross-sectional study24 (using 2015-2019 data) reported a significant association of ever using ENDS with asthma among youths who had never used combustible TP, a 2013-2019 study26 did not find an association in youths with asthma or respiratory symptoms. This latter finding is consistent with our findings of no association of P30D ENDS use with the age of asthma onset among youths. Our findings may also simply indicate the need for longer follow-up time because asthma onset may take longer time to manifest.

Strengths and Limitations

The primary strength of our study is the use of the PATH Study29 because few studies can test hypotheses with longitudinal data on tobacco-related health outcomes, including asthma, using a nationally representative sample of US adults and youths. Another strength is prospectively estimating the age of asthma onset between 2013 and 2021. This study also has limitations. Other factors associated with age of asthma onset include environmental factors,43 nutritional intake,44,45 maternal smoking status,46 genes,47,48 allergies,49 dust mites,50 and family history of asthma,51 but these factors were not measured in the PATH Study, and our results should be cautiously interpreted. The association of other covariates with the age of asthma onset were reported but not discussed because they were selected as covariates. Another limitation is that the PATH Study29 did not ask participants the exact date of their asthma diagnosis, so we estimated the age of asthma onset with interval-censoring survival methods. Other researchers may examine the P30D ENDS, daily ENDS use, number of puffs, or first flavor use as a time-varying variable. We limited the analysis to evaluate the association of P30D ENDS use with the age of asthma onset, and secondary hypotheses exploring the interaction of P30D ENDS use by sex and by race and ethnicity are in preparation.

Conclusions

This cohort study found that adults who reported never using cigarettes, not having asthma or COPD, and P30D ENDS use at the first wave of participation had increased risk of asthma incidence at earlier ages in comparison with adults who reported no P30D ENDS use. Systematic efforts are needed to curb the health burden of asthma, including earlier disease screening. Modifying screening asthma guidelines to incorporate the P30 ENDS use may result in early detection of asthma and can lead to better symptom control, lower doses of medication, fewer adverse effects, and improved treatment outcomes.52 Prevention and cessation programs directed at ENDS use are needed to alleviate its impact on the age of asthma onset.

Back to top
Article Information

Accepted for Publication: March 11, 2024.

Published: May 17, 2024. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.10740

Open Access: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License. © 2024 Pérez A et al. JAMA Network Open.

Corresponding Author: Adriana Pérez, PhD, Department of Biostatistics and Data Science, the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth), School of Public Health, Austin, TX 78701 (adriana.perez@uth.tmc.edu).

Author Contributions: Dr Pérez and Ms Valencia had full access to all of the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Concept and design: Pérez, Jani, Harrell.

Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: All authors.

Drafting of the manuscript: Pérez, Valencia, Jani.

Critical review of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Pérez, Jani, Harrell.

Statistical analysis: Pérez, Valencia.

Obtained funding: Pérez.

Administrative, technical, or material support: Pérez, Jani.

Supervision: Pérez.

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Harrell reported receiving personal fees from the state of Minnesota for serving as an expert witness in litigation that the state of Minnesota brought against JUUL and Altria outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.

Funding/Support: This study was supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (grant No. R21HL165401 to Dr Pérez) and the US Food and Drug Administration Center for Tobacco Products.

Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The funders had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Disclaimer: The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health or US Food and Drug Administration.

Data Sharing Statement: See Supplement 2.

References
1.
Asthma and Allergy Foundation of America. Asthma facts and figures. April 2022. Updated September 2023. Accessed September 11, 2023. https://www.aafa.org/asthma-facts/.
2.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Table 2-1 Lifetime asthma prevalence percents by age, United States: National Health Interview survey, 2019. Updated December 26, 2020. Accessed September 15, 2021. https://www.cdc.gov/asthma/nhis/2019/table2-1.htm
3.
Cairns  V, Keil  U, Kleinbaum  D, Doering  A, Stieber  J.  Alcohol consumption as a risk factor for high blood pressure: Munich Blood Pressure Study.   Hypertension. 1984;6(1):124-131. doi:10.1161/01.HYP.6.1.124PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
4.
Nurmagambetov  T, Kuwahara  R, Garbe  P.  The economic burden of asthma in the United States, 2008-2013.   Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2018;15(3):348-356. doi:10.1513/AnnalsATS.201703-259OCPubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
5.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).  Current cigarette smoking prevalence among working adults–United States, 2004-2010.   MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2011;60(38):1305-1309.PubMedGoogle Scholar
6.
Yaghoubi  M, Adibi  A, Safari  A, FitzGerald  JM, Sadatsafavi  M.  The projected economic and health burden of uncontrolled asthma in the United States.   Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019;200(9):1102-1112. doi:10.1164/rccm.201901-0016OCPubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
7.
Gwynn  RC.  Risk factors for asthma in US adults: results from the 2000 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System.   J Asthma. 2004;41(1):91-98. doi:10.1081/JAS-120026066PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
8.
Cornelius  ME, Loretan  CG, Jamal  A,  et al.  Tobacco product use among adults - United States, 2021.   MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2023;72(18):475-483. doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm7218a1PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
9.
Park-Lee  E, Ren  C, Cooper  M, Cornelius  M, Jamal  A, Cullen  KA.  Tobacco product use among middle and high school students - United States, 2022.   MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2022;71(45):1429-1435. doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm7145a1PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
10.
Cooper  M, Park-Lee  E, Ren  C, Cornelius  M, Jamal  A, Cullen  KA.  Notes from the field: e-cigarette use among middle and high school students - United States, 2022.   MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2022;71(40):1283-1285. doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm7140a3PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
11.
Park  HR, O’Sullivan  M, Vallarino  J,  et al.  Transcriptomic response of primary human airway epithelial cells to flavoring chemicals in electronic cigarettes.   Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):1400. doi:10.1038/s41598-018-37913-9PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
12.
Chang  CM, Edwards  SH, Arab  A, Del Valle-Pinero  AY, Yang  L, Hatsukami  DK.  Biomarkers of tobacco exposure: Summary of an FDA-sponsored public workshop.   Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2017;26(3):291-302. doi:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-16-0675PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
13.
Esteban-Lopez  M, Perry  MD, Garbinski  LD,  et al.  Health effects and known pathology associated with the use of E-cigarettes.   Toxicol Rep. 2022;9:1357-1368. doi:10.1016/j.toxrep.2022.06.006PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
14.
Farber  HJ, Conrado Pacheco Gallego  M, Galiatsatos  P, Folan  P, Lamphere  T, Pakhale  S.  Harms of electronic cigarettes: what the healthcare provider needs to know.   Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2021;18(4):567-572. doi:10.1513/AnnalsATS.202009-1113CMEPubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
15.
Wold  LE, Tarran  R, Crotty Alexander  LE,  et al; American Heart Association Council on Basic Cardiovascular Sciences; Council on Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis and Vascular Biology; Council on Hypertension; and Stroke Council.  Cardiopulmonary consequences of vaping in adolescents: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association.   Circ Res. 2022;131(3):e70-e82. doi:10.1161/RES.0000000000000544PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
16.
Eagan  TM, Brøgger  JC, Eide  GE, Bakke  PS.  The incidence of adult asthma: a review.   Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2005;9(6):603-612.PubMedGoogle Scholar
17.
Loftus  PA, Wise  SK.  Epidemiology of asthma.   Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016;24(3):245-249. doi:10.1097/MOO.0000000000000262PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
18.
Viegi  G, Maio  S, Fasola  S, Baldacci  S.  Global Burden of chronic respiratory diseases.   J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv. 2020;33(4):171-177. doi:10.1089/jamp.2019.1576PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
19.
Grabenhenrich  LB, Gough  H, Reich  A,  et al.  Early-life determinants of asthma from birth to age 20 years: a German birth cohort study.   J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014;133(4):979-988. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2013.11.035PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
20.
De Marco  R, Locatelli  F, Cerveri  I, Bugiani  M, Marinoni  A, Giammanco  G; Italian Study on Asthma in Young Adults study group.  Incidence and remission of asthma: a retrospective study on the natural history of asthma in Italy.   J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2002;110(2):228-235. doi:10.1067/mai.2002.125600PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
21.
Walker  CJ, Christian  WJ.  Estimating the population attributable fraction of asthma due to electronic cigarette use and other risk factors using Kentucky behavioral risk factor survey data, 2016-2017.   Subst Use Misuse. 2021;56(3):353-358. doi:10.1080/10826084.2020.1868002PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
22.
Bircan  E, Bezirhan  U, Porter  A, Fagan  P, Orloff  MS.  Erratum: Electronic cigarette use and its association with asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma-COPD overlap syndrome among never cigarette smokers.   Tob Induc Dis. 2021;19:74. doi:10.18332/tid/142579PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
23.
Li  X, Zhang  Y, Zhang  R, Chen  F, Shao  L, Zhang  L.  Association between e-cigarettes and asthma in adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis.   Am J Prev Med. 2022;62(6):953-960. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2022.01.015PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
24.
Roh  T, Uyamasi  K, Aggarwal  A, Obeng  A, Carrillo  G.  Association between e-cigarette use and asthma among US adolescents: Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System 2015-2019.   Prev Med. 2023;175:107695. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2023.107695PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
25.
Brunette  MF, Halenar  MJ, Edwards  KC,  et al.  Association between tobacco product use and asthma among US adults from the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) study waves 2-4.   BMJ Open Respir Res. 2023;10(1):e001187. doi:10.1136/bmjresp-2021-001187PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
26.
Mattingly  DT, Cook  S, Hirschtick  JL,  et al.  Longitudinal associations between exclusive, dual, and polytobacco use and asthma among US youth.   Prev Med. 2023;171:107512. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2023.107512PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
27.
von Elm  E, Altman  DG, Egger  M, Pocock  SJ, Gøtzsche  PC, Vandenbroucke  JP; STROBE Initiative.  The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.   J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61(4):344-349. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.11.008PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
28.
United States Department of Health Human Services Food and Drug Administration, National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Drug Abuse, Center for Tobacco Products. Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) study [United States] restricted-use files. [ICPSR 36231. National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program. October 4, 2023. Accessed April 1, 2024. https://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/NAHDAP/studies/36231
29.
Hyland  A, Ambrose  BK, Conway  KP,  et al.  Design and methods of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study.   Tob Control. 2017;26(4):371-378. doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-052934PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
30.
Lieberoth  S, Backer  V, Kyvik  KO,  et al.  Intake of alcohol and risk of adult-onset asthma.   Respir Med. 2012;106(2):184-188. doi:10.1016/j.rmed.2011.11.004PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
31.
Wills  TA, Choi  K, Pagano  I.  E-cigarette use associated with asthma independent of cigarette smoking and marijuana in a 2017 national sample of adolescents.   J Adolesc Health. 2020;67(4):524-530. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.03.001PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
32.
Burke  H, Leonardi-Bee  J, Hashim  A,  et al.  Prenatal and passive smoke exposure and incidence of asthma and wheeze: systematic review and meta-analysis.   Pediatrics. 2012;129(4):735-744. doi:10.1542/peds.2011-2196PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
33.
Tinuoye  O, Pell  JP, Mackay  DF.  Meta-analysis of the association between secondhand smoke exposure and physician-diagnosed childhood asthma.   Nicotine Tob Res. 2013;15(9):1475-1483. doi:10.1093/ntr/ntt033PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
34.
Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Overweight and obesity. Updated September 21, 2023. Accessed April 1, 2024. https://www.cdc.gov/obesity/index.html
35.
Klein  JP, Moeschberger  ML.  Survival analysis: techniques for censored and truncated data. Springer Science & Business Media; 2006.
36.
Goodall  RL, Dunn  DT, Babiker  AG.  Interval-censored survival time data: confidence intervals for the non-parametric survivor function.   Stat Med. 2004;23(7):1131-1145. doi:10.1002/sim.1682PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
37.
Betensky  RA, Rabinowitz  D, Tsiatis  AA.  Computationally simple accelerated failure time regression for interval censored data.   Biometrika. 2001;88(3):703-711. doi:10.1093/biomet/88.3.703Google ScholarCrossref
38.
Finkelstein  DM.  A proportional hazards model for interval-censored failure time data.   Biometrics. 1986;42(4):845-854. doi:10.2307/2530698PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
39.
Royston  P, Parmar  MK.  Flexible parametric proportional-hazards and proportional-odds models for censored survival data, with application to prognostic modelling and estimation of treatment effects.   Stat Med. 2002;21(15):2175-2197. doi:10.1002/sim.1203PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
40.
Ibrahim  JG, Chen  MH, Sinha  D.  Bayesian Survival Analysis. Springer; 2001.
41.
Collett  D.  Modelling Survival Data in Medical Research. 4th ed. Chapman & Hall; 2023.
42.
Sargent  JD, Halenar  MJ, Edwards  KC,  et al.  Tobacco use and respiratory symptoms among adults: findings from the longitudinal Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) study 2014-2016.   Nicotine Tob Res. 2022;24(10):1607-1618. doi:10.1093/ntr/ntac080PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
43.
Forno  E, Celedon  JC.  Asthma and ethnic minorities: socioeconomic status and beyond.   Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009;9(2):154-160. doi:10.1097/ACI.0b013e3283292207PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
44.
Hosseini  B, Berthon  BS, Wark  P, Wood  LG.  Effects of fruit and vegetable consumption on risk of asthma, wheezing and immune responses: a systematic review and meta-analysis.   Nutrients. 2017;9(4):341. doi:10.3390/nu9040341PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
45.
Ndanuko  RN, Tapsell  LC, Charlton  KE, Neale  EP, Batterham  MJ.  Dietary patterns and blood pressure in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.   Adv Nutr. 2016;7(1):76-89. doi:10.3945/an.115.009753PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
46.
Neuman  Å, Hohmann  C, Orsini  N,  et al; ENRIECO Consortium.  Maternal smoking in pregnancy and asthma in preschool children: a pooled analysis of eight birth cohorts.   Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012;186(10):1037-1043. doi:10.1164/rccm.201203-0501OCPubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
47.
Kuruvilla  ME, Vanijcharoenkarn  K, Shih  JA, Lee  FEH.  Epidemiology and risk factors for asthma.   Respir Med. 2019;149:16-22. doi:10.1016/j.rmed.2019.01.014PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
48.
Pettigrew  MM, Gent  JF, Zhu  Y,  et al.  Respiratory symptoms among infants at risk for asthma: association with surfactant protein A haplotypes.   BMC Med Genet. 2007;8:15. doi:10.1186/1471-2350-8-15PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
49.
Mirabelli  MC, Hsu  J, Gower  WA.  Comorbidities of asthma in U.S. children.   Respir Med. 2016;116:34-40. doi:10.1016/j.rmed.2016.05.008PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
50.
Platts-Mills  TA, Erwin  EA, Heymann  PW, Woodfolk  JA.  Pro: the evidence for a causal role of dust mites in asthma.   Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2009;180(2):109-113. doi:10.1164/rccm.200811-1756PRPubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
51.
Liu  T, Valdez  R, Yoon  PW, Crocker  D, Moonesinghe  R, Khoury  MJ.  The association between family history of asthma and the prevalence of asthma among US adults: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999-2004.   Genet Med. 2009;11(5):323-328. doi:10.1097/GIM.0b013e31819d3015PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
52.
Wang  SB, Huang  T.  The early detection of asthma based on blood gene expression.   Mol Biol Rep. 2019;46(1):217-223. doi:10.1007/s11033-018-4463-6PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
×