the authority of the court to take cognizance of the case in the first instance. a. appellate jurisdiction c. general jurisdiction b. | Question AI
Home
/
Law
/
The authority of the court to take cognizance of the case in the first instance. A. Appellate Jurisdiction C. General Jurisdiction B. Original Jurisdiction D. Exclusive Jurisdiction A person designated by the court to assist destitute litigants. A. Counsel de officio C. Attorney on record B. Attorney at law D. Special counsel

Question

The authority of the court to take cognizance of the case in the first instance. A. Appellate Jurisdiction C. General Jurisdiction B. Original Jurisdiction D. Exclusive Jurisdiction A person designated by the court to assist destitute litigants. A. Counsel de officio C. Attorney on record B. Attorney at law D. Special counsel

The authority of the court to take cognizance of the case in the first instance. A. Appellate Jurisdiction C. General Jurisdiction B. Original Jurisdiction D. Exclusive Jurisdiction A person designated by the court to assist destitute litigants. A. Counsel de officio C. Attorney on record B. Attorney at law D. Special counsel

81
Answer
4.0(275 votes)
avatar
Eduardo SantosElite · Tutor for 8 years

Answer

<p> 72. B<br />73. A</p>

Explanation

<p> <br />72. The question relates to the different types of legal jurisdiction, more precisely which among the choices pertains to a court's power to hear and decide a case for the first time (first instance). Original Jurisdiction is exactly that - it is the court's authority to hear a case for the first time, before any appeals have occurred. Appellate Jurisdiction, on the task other hand, speaks of a court's authority to review the decisions made by lower courts. General Jurisdiction refers to a court's wide scope or competence to adjudicate over all kinds of cases, while Exclusive Jurisdiction points out specific types of cases only certain courts can hear. <br /><br />73. The second question pertains to the different roles in a legal setting, specifically a role allocated by the court to provide assistance to indigent litigants. An Counsel de officio refers to a lawyer appointed by the court to represent defendants who cannot afford to hire a private lawyer. Attorney at law is a legal practitioner in a court system authorized to perform the prosecution or defense of actions in such court on the retainer of clients and who is accountable to the justice of a peaceful society, but is not necessarily assigned to assist poor litigants. Attorney on record refers to the attorney who appears in a court of record as representing or acting on behalf of a litigant but, again, ilis provision is available for rich and poor litigants alike. Special counsel, in the meantime, pertains to lawyers assigned to investigate, and potentially prosecute, a particular instance of alleged wrongdoing for which a conflict of interest exists for the usual prosecuting authority.</p>
Does the answer help you? Rate for it!