Is the Tillman thing a loan of a loan or a reloan or could they not afford him or was it down to the guile of the sevco negotiators or is it a pile of crap. I’m totally bemused
The Tillman stuff is absolutely tragic, even by their standards.
- 2,9241,750
Dear ReaderOtis B Driftwood wrote: ↑3:53 PM - 11 days agoThe Times crossword clues are a skoosh by comparison. (4, 6)
What's my prize?
- 794573
We have been here before with the lies and the feel good stories that are masking the reality. If we win the league and pocket the CL money, they are streets behind us financially and they know itsan meegs wrote:The Tillman stuff is absolutely tragic, even by their standards.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
- 3,5552,125
Does anyone actually have an idea what the deal is with the huns and Tillman.
From memory they had a try before you buy loan, His parent club then backed out on the buy option and gave the huns £1m compo (so they say)
Now that he's being sold they are getting another payout? Seems far fetched but who knows.
So if anyone knows the truth here or close to the truth I'd appreciate it.
My head is puggled trying to work this p!sh oot!
From memory they had a try before you buy loan, His parent club then backed out on the buy option and gave the huns £1m compo (so they say)
Now that he's being sold they are getting another payout? Seems far fetched but who knows.
So if anyone knows the truth here or close to the truth I'd appreciate it.
My head is puggled trying to work this p!sh oot!
- 21K4,807
Not getting a boot in the baws.jimthetim73 wrote: ↑5:31 PM - 11 days agoDear ReaderOtis B Driftwood wrote: ↑3:53 PM - 11 days agoThe Times crossword clues are a skoosh by comparison. (4, 6)
What's my prize?
- 3,0791,765
- 22K9,913
Sevco had an option to buy. Tillman made it clear he had no intention of staying there and Sevco also couldnt afford to exercise the option. The media then fabricated a story about Bayern compensating Sevco in an attempt to save face.Mississippi Bhoy wrote: ↑5:55 PM - 11 days agoDoes anyone actually have an idea what the deal is with the huns and Tillman.
From memory they had a try before you buy loan, His parent club then backed out on the buy option and gave the huns £1m compo (so they say)
Now that he's being sold they are getting another payout? Seems far fetched but who knows.
So if anyone knows the truth here or close to the truth I'd appreciate it.
My head is puggled trying to work this p!sh oot!
- 3,5552,125
See, that I believe. But why all this elaborate fabrication?Mickeybhoy84 wrote: ↑6:09 PM - 11 days agoSevco had an option to buy. Tillman made it clear he had no intention of staying there and Sevco also couldnt afford to exercise the option. The media then fabricated a story about Bayern compensating Sevco in an attempt to save face.Mississippi Bhoy wrote: ↑5:55 PM - 11 days agoDoes anyone actually have an idea what the deal is with the huns and Tillman.
From memory they had a try before you buy loan, His parent club then backed out on the buy option and gave the huns £1m compo (so they say)
Now that he's being sold they are getting another payout? Seems far fetched but who knows.
So if anyone knows the truth here or close to the truth I'd appreciate it.
My head is puggled trying to work this p!sh oot!
Its a bit like buying an ex an Indian just before you dump her. She'll focus on the meal rather than being dumped.Mickeybhoy84 wrote: ↑6:09 PM - 11 days agoSevco had an option to buy. Tillman made it clear he had no intention of staying there and Sevco also couldnt afford to exercise the option. The media then fabricated a story about Bayern compensating Sevco in an attempt to save face.Mississippi Bhoy wrote: ↑5:55 PM - 11 days agoDoes anyone actually have an idea what the deal is with the huns and Tillman.
From memory they had a try before you buy loan, His parent club then backed out on the buy option and gave the huns £1m compo (so they say)
Now that he's being sold they are getting another payout? Seems far fetched but who knows.
So if anyone knows the truth here or close to the truth I'd appreciate it.
My head is puggled trying to work this p!sh oot!
Bayern must be reeling at this new hot-shot club figuring out a way to make money from a player they've never owned.
Strange how nobody else is making deals like this in the footballing world.
Strange how nobody else is making deals like this in the footballing world.
- 19K22,915
Nothing sums up the desperate lengths to which the SMSM will go to keep the huns relevant and on board more than this Tillman tissue of pish. They take fantasies from FF and present them as news. Laughable.
As much as it chokes me to say it, I actually think there is truth in this Tillman thing. When der hun brought him in on loan, it was witha future fee agreed, believed to be £5m. Then it appears that Bayern bought that out for £1m so the clause was deactivated.
That means that they could then sell him for more if the offers came in and it appears that it has from PSV. I also see they are claiming there is a sell on clause. I'm not as sure about that but on this very rare occasion, I actually do believe that by stepping aside, der hun were compensated.
Hopefully I'm wrong
That means that they could then sell him for more if the offers came in and it appears that it has from PSV. I also see they are claiming there is a sell on clause. I'm not as sure about that but on this very rare occasion, I actually do believe that by stepping aside, der hun were compensated.
Hopefully I'm wrong
- 22K9,913
They watched us successfully utilise the loan to buy scheme and decided Tillman was their chance to replicate that. Once that particular deal fell through they had to concoct a cover story rather than admit they made an arse of it.Mississippi Bhoy wrote: ↑6:12 PM - 11 days agoSee, that I believe. But why all this elaborate fabrication?Mickeybhoy84 wrote: ↑6:09 PM - 11 days agoSevco had an option to buy. Tillman made it clear he had no intention of staying there and Sevco also couldnt afford to exercise the option. The media then fabricated a story about Bayern compensating Sevco in an attempt to save face.
- 4,3557,136
- 12K7,639
If it is (8, 7, 6) then it could be Potemkin Village Loyal.Mississippi Bhoy wrote: ↑6:12 PM - 11 days agoSee, that I believe. But why all this elaborate fabrication?Mickeybhoy84 wrote: ↑6:09 PM - 11 days agoSevco had an option to buy. Tillman made it clear he had no intention of staying there and Sevco also couldnt afford to exercise the option. The media then fabricated a story about Bayern compensating Sevco in an attempt to save face.
I mean yeah that could be the case…PMSW wrote: ↑6:26 PM - 11 days agoAs much as it chokes me to say it, I actually think there is truth in this Tillman thing. When der hun brought him in on loan, it was witha future fee agreed, believed to be £5m. Then it appears that Bayern bought that out for £1m so the clause was deactivated.
That means that they could then sell him for more if the offers came in and it appears that it has from PSV. I also see they are claiming there is a sell on clause. I'm not as sure about that but on this very rare occasion, I actually do believe that by stepping aside, der hun were compensated.
Hopefully I'm wrong
But then, in the accounts there was nothing about this mythical deal.
Which should have shown this myth up for what it was…a lot of absolute nonsense.
It wouldn't specify that in the accounts. It would come under player trading or the like and would be rolled into one (not very) big figure. So all the monies in for players is one figure and all the ones out another.j1114 wrote: ↑6:35 PM - 11 days agoI mean yeah that could be the case…PMSW wrote: ↑6:26 PM - 11 days agoAs much as it chokes me to say it, I actually think there is truth in this Tillman thing. When der hun brought him in on loan, it was witha future fee agreed, believed to be £5m. Then it appears that Bayern bought that out for £1m so the clause was deactivated.
That means that they could then sell him for more if the offers came in and it appears that it has from PSV. I also see they are claiming there is a sell on clause. I'm not as sure about that but on this very rare occasion, I actually do believe that by stepping aside, der hun were compensated.
Hopefully I'm wrong
But then, in the accounts there was nothing about this mythical deal.
Which should have shown this myth up for what it was…a lot of absolute nonsense.
Trust me, I'm usually the first to call out their shampoo but I can see a deal like this being struck between two teams. It would also have been a way to get money into a cash strapped business and the hun sure as sh!t needed money.
- 19K22,915
More pish. The idea that a fee wasn’t contingent on the player’s agreement to the move is pre-Bosnan nonsense Dear God. We have a believer in FF’s gibberish. LMAO!PMSW wrote: ↑6:26 PM - 11 days agoAs much as it chokes me to say it, I actually think there is truth in this Tillman thing. When der hun brought him in on loan, it was witha future fee agreed, believed to be £5m. Then it appears that Bayern bought that out for £1m so the clause was deactivated.
That means that they could then sell him for more if the offers came in and it appears that it has from PSV. I also see they are claiming there is a sell on clause. I'm not as sure about that but on this very rare occasion, I actually do believe that by stepping aside, der hun were compensated.
Hopefully I'm wrong
It was reported that Bayern also did this with another 2 players. One who was loaned to Seville and another to Crystal Palace. It's not as far fetched as you'd like it to be. They did it with inserting a buyback clause.Torquemada wrote: ↑6:42 PM - 11 days agoMore pish. The idea that a fee wasn’t contingent on the player’s agreement to the move is pre-Bosnan nonsense Dear God. We have a believer in FF’s gibberish. LMAO!PMSW wrote: ↑6:26 PM - 11 days agoAs much as it chokes me to say it, I actually think there is truth in this Tillman thing. When der hun brought him in on loan, it was witha future fee agreed, believed to be £5m. Then it appears that Bayern bought that out for £1m so the clause was deactivated.
That means that they could then sell him for more if the offers came in and it appears that it has from PSV. I also see they are claiming there is a sell on clause. I'm not as sure about that but on this very rare occasion, I actually do believe that by stepping aside, der hun were compensated.
Hopefully I'm wrong