A place to post links to articles from a type of news site, covering all topics. It is advisable to create question-and-answer posts to verify if an article is fake news. News and conspiracy theories about the New World Order.
Electron - A Mathematical Fiction
Sort by:
Best
Open comment sort options
Best
Top
New
Controversial
Old
Q&A
The debate surrounding the existence and nature of the electron particle remains a subject of ongoing inquiry and contention. Dissenting voices such as Tesla, Heaviside, Maxwell, and Steinmetz challenge conventional wisdom, offering alternative viewpoints that provoke reflection and debate. While the consensus view posits the electron as a discrete particle with defined properties, the dissenting perspectives highlight the complexities and uncertainties inherent in our understanding of fundamental particles. As scientific inquiry continues to evolve, the insights gleaned from these contrarian voices serve as catalysts for reexamining established paradigms and advancing our understanding of the fundamental nature of matter.
Tesla's Contrarian View:
Nikola Tesla, renowned for his groundbreaking work in electrical engineering, held unconventional views on the nature of matter, including the electron. In a 1928 interview, Tesla expressed skepticism towards the prevailing atomic theory, rejecting the existence of the electron as traditionally conceived. He challenged the notion of the electron as a point-like particle, instead proposing it to be a larger entity carrying a surface charge. Tesla's perspective emphasized the inadequacy of existing theories to explain the behavior of electrons, highlighting the limitations of conventional scientific paradigms.
Heaviside's Skepticism:
Oliver Heaviside, a pioneering mathematician and physicist, shared Tesla's skepticism towards the electron's conventional depiction. Heaviside criticized the concept of the electron as a negatively charged body, arguing against its characterization as a discrete particle with inherent rest mass. His insights underscored the need for a paradigm shift in understanding the fundamental constituents of matter, challenging the prevailing orthodoxy of his time.