Williams v. United States of America
| Franklin L. Williams |
| United States Of America and Warden at FCI - Tanis Unit |
| 1:2013cv00267 |
| April 3, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Austin Office |
| Sam Sparks |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
9
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re: 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas filed by Franklin L. Williams. RECOMMENDS that the District Judge DISMISS with prejudice Franklin L. Williams's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. FURTHER RECOMMENDS the District Judge warn Williams that the filing of any future habeas petitions without approval may result in the imposition of additional sanctions. FURTHER RECOMMENDS the District Judge direct the Clerk's Office to send a c opy of the District Judges order in this case as well as the District Judge's prior order imposing sanctions upon Williams to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia, Waycross Division, 601 Tebeau Street, Waycross, Georgia 31501. See Williams v. Pearce, No. 1:12-CV-00368-SS, slip op. (W.D. Tex. Feb. 13, 2013) (Dkt. No. 28). Finally, the undersigned FURTHER RECOMMENDS the District Judge DISMISS AS MOOT Williamss remaining motions in this case (Dkt. Nos. 3, 7, 8). Signed by Judge Andrew W. Austin. (td)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
