Takeda Pharmaceuticals Reviews

Cons

Too many getups overlapping work

Cons

Takeda takes advantage of their employees and prevents opportunities for growth for individuals as some managers want to resource guard their talent. For example, on multiple occasions I have heard of senior leaders preventing or trying to delay "high potential" talent from switching brands within a BU or between BUs. One team had 4 maternity or paternity leaves happen in the middle of 2 launches over a 5 month span, and rather than open those positions to development or stretch assignments for others in different BUs, all the work fell on 1-2 individuals, without any recognition or compensation for their contributions. Most leaders don't prioritize internal applicants for their open roles, and it is considered more important to attract new talent rather than retain current talent through development or stretch assignments. Takeda promotes individuals who tow the company line, and not on individuals who invest in developing and creating opportunities of growth or recognition for themselves or their team members.

Cons

Constant shifts and changes in leadership made career development and upward movement challenging due to inconsistencies in opportunities, communication, expectations, and commitment to culture by leaders. Teams were understaffed, overworked, and undersupported, bogged down with processes that led to burnout and employee mental health issues. Leaders were difficult to trust. Transparency was lacking among team structures. Information sharing was highly controlled and often stayed with only a select few. The talking points spoken by Sr. Director and above leadership are not often backed by action. An annual "cleaning of the house" exists where stakeholders suddenly disappear. The HR business partner is working for leadership, not the employee. You are treated like a number if you leave or are separated from the company. Takeda does not live up to its people-first value.

Cons

However, it's important to note that Takeda Pharmaceuticals seemed to struggle with providing clear pathways for upward mobility within the organization. Despite my efforts and contributions, I found that growth opportunities were limited, and it was challenging to advance into more senior roles. In addition the pay was lower than average and HR refused to negotiate my salary. Moreover, I experienced a disheartening situation where both myself and several colleagues were abruptly terminated upon providing our two weeks' notice. This lack of transparency and seemingly retaliatory action left a bitter taste, casting doubt on the company's commitment to fostering a stable and respectful work environment.

Cons

I ask a lot of questions so I can understand what I'm doing and why. There were documented cases where my co-workers with harassing and bullying me. I quite because I was crying on shift a lot, and my supervisor kept brushing the issues under the rug. Almost every task we performed had to be done with at least two people, and I would request help from co-workers to proceed to next steps. Someone would say they would come and then ghost me for an hour or two before showing up. I would request to be on teams for activities, and then co-workers always responded that they didn't see my messages in the group chat. And one of my co-workers threatened me in the parking lot, because I wasn't responding to their bullying in the way they wanted me to respond.

Cons

This has probably changed but there were some legacy employees from acquisitions that may have needed to move on.

Cons

RSU grants are 1/2 of other companies in Boston area at AD level, which is hundreds of thousands of dollars over time opportunity cost. I still think it is worth it for all the other positive aspects, but if I ever leave this will be why.

Cons

Small location, so maybe people were spread too thin.

Cons

Chaotic at times because it is going through a lot of change

Cons

I don't see any major Cons.