Osorno et al v. Avant Gardner LLC. et al
| Jose Manuel Pastrana, Samuel Lopez Montalvo, Arturo Osorno and Fernando Perez Garcia |
| AGDP Holding, Inc., Philipp Wiederkehr, Avant Gardner LLC., Benjamin Roshia, Stanislav Chijik, Juergen Bildstein, AGDP Holding, Inc. doing business as Brooklyn Mirage formerly known as Avant Gardner Mgmt, Inc., Avant Gardner LLC. doing business as Brooklyn Mirage and Avant Gardner Mgmt, Inc. |
| 1:2018cv01513 |
| March 12, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Ann M Donnelly |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against AGDP Holding, Inc., Avant Gardner LLC., Juergen Bildstein, Stanislav Chijik, Benjamin Roshia, Philipp Wiederkehr filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0207-10267227 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -Yes,, filed by Fernando Perez Garcia, Jose Manuel Pastrana, Samuel Lopez Montalvo, Arturo Osorno. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons Avant Gardner LLC, #3 Proposed Summons AGDP Holding, Inc., #4 Proposed Summons Benjamin Roshia, #5 Proposed Summons Juergen Bildstein, #6 Proposed Summons Philipp Wiederkehr, #7 Proposed Summons Stanislav Chijik) (Faillace, Michael)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
