1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 186 F.3d
  5. 186 F.3d 1328 (1999)
 

STIMPSON v. CITY OF TUSCALOOSA

Nos. 98-6142, 98-6186.

186 F.3d 1328 (1999)

Sandra Leigh STIMPSON, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CITY OF TUSCALOOSA, J. Russell Gibson, et al., Defendants-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

August 30, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert W. Ennis, IV, Tuscaloosa, AL, Christopher Lyle McIlwain, Hubbard, Smith, McIlwain, Brakefield & Shattuck, Tuscaloosa, AL, for Defendants-Appellants.

Samuel Fisher, Ann C. Robertson, Joel S. Isenberg, Gordon, Silberman, Wiggins & Childs, Birmingham, AL, Sarah L. Thompson, Tuscaloosa, AL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Before COX, Circuit Judge, FAY, Senior Circuit Judge, and NANGLE, Senior District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

The City of Tuscaloosa ("the City") and the Civil Service Board of Tuscaloosa ("the Civil Service Board") appeal a judgment against them under Title VII for wrongful termination based on sex. They argue that the district court wrongly denied their motion for a judgment as a matter of law because the plaintiff did not introduce any evidence that the City's alleged discrimination directly caused her termination. We agree, and therefore REVERSE.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases