Wiggins v. Vega et al, No. 1:2013cv02037 - Document 25 (S.D.N.Y. 2013)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: re: 3 APPLICATION for the Court to Request Counsel filed by Reginald Cletis Wiggins. The plaintiffs application for the Court to appoint counsel is therefore denied without prejudice for failure to make the required showing at this time. The Clerk is directed to close Docket No. 3. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 10/16/2013) (rsh)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK REGINALD CLETIS WIGGINS, 13 Civ. 2037 (JGK) Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - against DETECTIVE VEGA, ET AL., Defendants. JOHN G. KOELTL, District Judge: The plaintiff s application to appoint counsel is denied without prejudice for failure to make the required showing. The Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has articulated factors that should guide the Court s discretion to appoint counsel to represent an indigent civil litigant under 28 U.S.C. ยง 1915. See Hodge v. Police Officers, 802 F.2d 58, 61-62 (2d Cir. 1986); Jackson v. Moscicki, No. 99 Civ. 2427, 2000 WL 511642, at *4 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 27, 2000). For the Court to order the appointment of counsel, the plaintiff must, as a threshold matter, demonstrate that the claim has substance or a likelihood of success on the merits. See Hodge, 802 F.2d at 60-61. Only then can the Court consider the other factors appropriate to determination of whether counsel should be appointed: plaintiff s ability to obtain representation independently, and [her] ability to handle the case without assistance in the light 1 of the required factual investigation, the complexity of the legal issues, and the need for expertly conducted crossexamination to test veracity. Cooper v. A. Sargenti Co., Inc., 877 F.2d 170, 172 (2d Cir. 1989). such a showing. The plaintiff has not made The plaintiff s application for the Court to appoint counsel is therefore denied without prejudice for failure to make the required showing at this time. The Clerk is directed to close Docket No. 3. SO ORDERED. Dated: New York, New York October 16, 2013 _____________/s/_____________ John G. Koeltl United States District Judge 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.