US District Court for the Western District of Missouri Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 2,230
Jones v. Rapid Robert's
as 6:2024cv03114
Plaintiff:
Eric V. Jones, Sr.
Defendant:
Rapid Robert's
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Monaco et al v. Orec America, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv00276
Plaintiff:
Shelby M Monaco and Brian Monaco
Defendant:
Orec America, Inc. and Five Star Traders, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Brazell v. Lindsey et al
as 6:2024cv03110
Plaintiff:
Jason Brazell
Defendant:
Scott Lindsey, Texas County Memorial Hospital, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Shunstrom v. Cordonnier et al
as 6:2024cv03109
Plaintiff:
Alison Y. Shunstrom
Defendant:
Michael J. Cordonnier and Andrew Bailey
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Mattison v. Platte County R-3 School District et al
as 5:2024cv06052
Plaintiff:
Betsy Mattison
Defendant:
Platte County R-3 School District, Aaron Duff and Chris Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Meier v. Degase
as 6:2024cv03099
Plaintiff:
Aaron Meier
Defendant:
Sheriff Chris Degase
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brondel v. Bailey
as 2:2024cv04053
Plaintiff:
Wayne L Brondel
Defendant:
Andrew Bailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Branca v. Lottinger et al
as 4:2024cv00225
Plaintiff:
James Branca
Defendant:
Robert Lottinger, Steve Powell, Robert Taylor and others
Sanders et al v. Pettis County, Missouri et al
as 2:2024cv04045
Plaintiff:
Cassie Sanders and Matthew Sanders
Defendant:
Pettis County, Missouri, Pettis County Sheriffs Deputy Gooch, Pettis County Sheriffs Deputy Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Humes v. T-Mobile Security John Doe
as 4:2024cv00217
Plaintiff:
Edward Lee Humes
Defendant:
T-Mobile Security John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
