The justices close the door on the March argument cycle this morning. On tap is the second of two closely watched partisan gerrymander challenges. Could Mayer Brown’s Michael Kimberly give the justices the answer in their search for a constitutional standard for redistricting? SCOTUS advocates turned out in force to cheer David Frederick of Kellogg, Hansen,Todd, Figel & Frederick, as he celebrated his 50th high court argument. There was no red carpet, but lots of good will. And we look at an amicus brief—from UCLA Law School prof Richard Re—that got a lot of attention during an argument Tuesday.
Thanks as always for reading, and we appreciate any feedback. Contact us at [email protected] and [email protected].
Mapping a Gerrymander Solution
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
