Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver for AmTrust Bank v. RPM Mortgage, Inc.
| Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver for AmTrust Bank |
| RPM Mortgage, Inc. |
| 3:2015cv05534 |
| December 3, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Contra Costa |
| Maria-Elena James |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
103
ORDER by Judge Edward M. Chen Granting 98 Third Party Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment. (emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/29/2018)
|
|
Filing
85
ORDER Denying 81 RPM Mortgage, Inc.'s Motion for Default Judgment. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 3/15/2018. (emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/15/2018)
|
|
Filing
78
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 76 Dismissing Third Party Defendant Jaclynn Coates (ONLY) with Prejudice filed by RPM Mortgage, Inc.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 11/17/17. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/17/2017)
|
|
Filing
56
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 54 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER for Extension of Time to Answer for Third Party Jaclynn Coates filed by Jaclynn Coates. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 11/21/16. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/21/2016)
|
|
Filing
50
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 47 to Modify Case Management Order filed by Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver for AmTrust Bank. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 10/27/16. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/27/2016)
|
|
Filing
37
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 36 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Protective Order filed by Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver for AmTrust Bank. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 9/30/16. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/30/2016)
|
|
Filing
23
STIPULATION AND ORDER re: 22 : Case Management Conference continued from 3/17/2016 to 4/7/2016 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Case Management Statement due by 3/31/2016. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 3/14/2016. (afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/14/2016)
|
|
Filing
17
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 15 Stipulation to file amended answer filed by RPM Mortgage, Inc. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 3/2/16. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/2/2016)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER, Case reassigned to Edward M. Chen. Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James no longer assigned to the case.. Signed by Executive Committee on 1/5/16. (ha, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/5/2016)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver for AmTrust Bank v. RPM Mortgage, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver for AmTrust Bank | |
| Represented By: | Dana Jean Clausen |
| Represented By: | Paul Andrew Levin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: RPM Mortgage, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | David Evan Harris |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
