Fast Memory Erase LLC v. Spansion Inc et al
| Fast Memory Erase LLC |
| Spansion Inc, Spansion LLC, Intel Corporation, Numonyx BV, Numonyx Inc, STMicroelectronics NV, STMicroelectronics Inc, Nokia Corporation, Nokia Inc, Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications AB, Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications (USA) Inc and Motorola Inc |
| 3:2008cv00977 |
| June 9, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Patent Office |
| Dallas |
| Barbara M. G. Lynn |
| Both |
| Federal Question |
| 28:1338 Patent Infringement |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
332
Memorandum Opinion and Order: The jury will be instructed in accordance with the Court's construction of certain terms in the '959 patent, as set out in this Memorandum Opinion. (see order for specifics) (Ordered by Judge Barbara M. G. Lynn on 2/2/2010) (tln)
|
|
Filing
303
Memorandum Order The court denies defendants' motion to compel discovery [Doc. #181]. Because defendants may not discover the SI reports and underlying data, they are not entitled to depose the SI personnel involved in the testing process. The court therefore grants plaintiffs' motion for protective order [Doc. #264] and denies defendants' request [Doc. #245] and revised request [Doc. #259] for letters rogatory. See Order (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Jeff Kaplan on 12/16/2009) (svc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
