EC Source Services Reviews

Cons

Lots of restructuring in the last year.

Cons

The hours could be long and typical

Cons

They are having some serious turnovers, they let go of the hard workers but keep the people that point the finger onto others. Salary was always lower than average.

Cons

EC Source has had an extremely high turnover rate of senior leadership which brought instability among the rank and file. Most of my associates were constantly polishing their resumes either out of fear or to find a more stable work environment. ESC has had a very difficult time winning work adding the stress of the job. Leadership in Houston always seemed disengaged from the company mission of power delivery, instead, was focused on forms, policies and procedures while their competitors passed them by.

Cons

This company has an extremely high turnover rate of senior and middle management making it an unstable and hostile environment- they bid, win and then lose 99% work they bid on. ECS / Mastec has the reputation of not paying their vendors so they are constantly on COD or NO RENT or SALE terms with their vendors- When I left - they lost two major projects that they had won- then lost- they were eating their own trying to survive

Cons

• A nebulous organization that doesn't really exist • It may say MasTec Power Delivery Group but there is no group, just a collection of individual brands. No economy of scale here. • VP of Health and Safety ignored complaints of bullying, threats of violence, and substance abuse saying "he handled it" having done nothing. • VP of Health and Safety lies about qualifications (Certified Safety Professional) without evidence or record of ever actually earning it. • No teamwork, no collaboration, no appreciation, no recognition, no integrity, no trust • Delegation? There was none. Micromanagement? Yes • Many Information hoarders and "Single Paths of Failure" throughout. • VP of Health & Safety appears to enjoy manipulating people and regularly says one thing in private conversation and then something completely different in groups. Likes masking insults and offensive remarks in “humor” and encourages everyone that what is said in the safety group stays in the safety group • I very often would hear things from my colleagues that I had shared with the VP of Health & Safety in confidence • It's a "zero incident," blame-game culture more interested in manipulating OSHA logs than in actual substantive change. • Coming out of the pandemic year, the company newsletter from MasTec included an admonishment from MasTec's owner that every employee "should think about MasTec as if they, like him, owned the company." A month later, MasTec's COO admonished everyone to just work harder. • When discussing the hazards and risks associated with line construction work on a 14-hour day, 7-day a week schedule, a Project Manager advised, "That's why they get paid overtime." • Pushed people back into an office where office doors are always closed and interaction is non-existent...attendance was taken • Training and promotion opportunities aren't posted or shared. Former Eversource employees would show up in new positions and locations without communication. • If you don't like seatbelts and enjoy driving industrial, company-owned vehicles at triple-digit speed, even with regular, monthly, GPS tracking, this is the place for you. There is NO accountability. • A divisive and hostile work environment absent of all indications of vision, strategy, and execution...throw enough bids out until something sticks, whether they can execute or not. • VP of Health and Safety creates distrust and derision within the safety "team" by gossiping about everyone. Who is "useless", "henpecked," and too "stupid" to understand while having to hear about how "smart" he is. • So insecure, the VP of Health & Safety sent out a mandatory survey requiring everyone to respond on how they would do his job differently. • A constantly revolving door, according to HR in Mesa, personnel turnover was at 95% • Incident Investigations and Analysis were a joke with no systemic issues ever brought forward. Blame the victim, manage them off the OSHA log and move on. • A ridiculously long pre-employment package that conveys a message of how irrelevant and dispensable each "employee" is...believe the message

Cons

Rotating door. Constant retraining of workforce

Cons

Management communication between corporate and supervisors down to employees.

Cons

Have yet to get a bonus and the job gets delayed sometimes

Cons

lack of innovative management and arbitrary enforcement of policies