DaVita's Big Insurance Problem (NYSE:DVA) | Seeking Alpha
Entering text into the input field will update the search result below

DaVita's Big Insurance Problem

Jun. 17, 2018 8:40 PM ETDaVita Inc. (DVA) Stock19 Comments
Ethan Watkins profile picture
Ethan Watkins
90 Followers

Summary

  • DaVita receives all of its profitability from insurance payers.
  • Insurance companies are no longer going to allow premium assistance from the American Kidney Fund.
  • The scope of aid from the fund is larger then what DaVita has let on.

Insurance Payers

DaVita (NYSE:DVA) is one of two large dialysis providers in the United States, and all of its profitability is propped up by its insurance payers. Insurance payers account for 33% of the company’s revenue but only make up 10.5% of its total patients. The problem is that since the federal government no longer mandates Americans buy health insurance, it is expected that roughly 13 million healthy Americans will opt out of having health insurance entirely. DaVita relies on its healthy patients’ insurance payments to support their kidney dialysis recipients - it takes 3,800 healthy patients to pay for 1 kidney dialysis patient ($150,000 annually). With those healthy patients no longer paying into health insurance, this means DaVita’s kidney dialysis patients could go unfunded. This means the company’s insurance paying kidney dialysis patients - its only profitable clients - are in danger. As a result, so is DaVita.

The American Kidney Fund

DaVita’s insurance payers rely heavily upon the American Kidney Fund (AKF) for financial support in its dialysis programs. The AKF helps by offering to pay health insurance premiums for its clients. This cushions the blow for patients and pads the bottom line for the company. Both DaVita and the AKF have come under fire in the past few years.

A lawsuit filed by United Healthcare alleged that DaVita steered Americans off of Medicare plans and onto commercial plans. The lawsuit went on to say that DaVita then encouraged those patients to receive aid from the AKF, which DaVita donates heavily to. As a result of all of this, health insurance companies have incorporated into their policies that they will no longer allow charitable donations to pay for patients’ premiums. DaVita acknowledge this in its latest 10-Q:

“A number of commercial payors have incorporated policies into their provider

This article was written by

Ethan Watkins profile picture
90 Followers
I am a part time investor.  I have been a mortgage banker 2 years. I am currently a full time member of the army. I invest with money I made on deployment.

Analyst’s Disclosure: I am/we are short DVA. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Seeking Alpha's Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.

Recommended For You

Comments (19)

F
American health care generally is poorer than European care and more costly.

This is also the state of ESRD care. The largest dialysis companies earn substantial fees from their integrated ancillary businesses. Profits improve with high failures inherent in conventional HD care including ospitalizations, surgery, travel etc, etc.

Intensive home hemodialysis (IHD) has demonstrated better outcomes esp, quality of life at lower costs than conventional 3X per week standard hemodialysis treatment.
These HD care companies and a few drug companies seek to maintain status quo.
l
Just a side note: The comment about increasing costs because of more kidney disease is well taken. I retired from a clinical lab who worked with DaVita and can say they have a pretty efficient operation as far as scheduling, supply contracts and general operations. It is the necessary procedures to insure safety and effectiveness for patients that tends to have an effect on costs and these can not be managed away. I don't know the answer to increasing medical costs but as new treatments come on line, cost will increase and an increasing percentage of the GDP will go to this sector. Ironically, kidney disease is increasing because increasing longevity offers more opportunity for people to get this problem as they age.
flesh profile picture
Not a bad write up but your timing is off. You really should've gone short/wrote this after the divestiture is complete and after the likely resulting uptick.
Trowbridge Capital Partners LLC profile picture
Good expose'. I look forward to reading your series.
It is really a commendable accomplishment for an enlisted person to write and publish an article on Seekingalpha. You may have an alternative career in front of yourself. Keep up the good work!
m
Sets a dangerous precedent if you say who can and cannot pay your premium. This charitable assistance is also similar to copay assistance for expensive drugs and I am assuming they would then be next in line. I am not sure I would be picking this fight if I were insurance companies. They transition to Medicare anyway at 30 months. There is talk the government may extend that longer to keep them from footing the bill.
hijlehhw profile picture
The patients CANT pay the bill...and if they don't get treatment they die..period.

The gov CANT foot the entire bill because there are too many patients and the number grows every year, the treatment can be long and expensive.

The providers CANT foot the bill more than they currently do, or the business will be unprofitable and they will simply close up shop.

The ONLY option is for the costs to be put upon the insurance companies...they make PLENTY already...they just see how it is playing out and they know what I just said to be true and they aren't happy about it and are trying to fight back...hell if I was an insurance company concerned about the bottom line I would try to lessen the damage too...but thats just the nature of the beast. They can't win this one.

And they won't get the backing of the feds because they know the problem is too big and can't foot the bill...so the gov will allow the providers to remain profitable enough to stay in business and continue to provide a life saving service...thats it. Period...
staz profile picture
This article just shows that the shorts are in pain and this is a desperate attempt . See you at $80 ;-)
hijlehhw profile picture
Id be surprised if it stops at 80...
staz profile picture
Just a first target . I think $100 is possible here before the year ends
P
It is not a scheme. Why don’t have facts to back up where the AKI funds come from?
hijlehhw profile picture
There is no secret where AKF money comes from, in fact, and heres a real kicker...DVA isn't hiding that they contribute!! NO NEWS HERE FOLKS
donzoab profile picture
Laughable analysis. Being short here is an incredibly bad gamble based on flawed logic but even worse, if and when the government approved the sale of the physicians group to UNH, dva will repurchase billions of stock. Shorts are going to get roasted here and the move up has already begun.
Ethan Watkins profile picture
That’s a great question. The bottom line answer is that the pool of insurance money is now getting smaller because of the loss of the individual mandate. It has been only recently that this scheme of steering patients to commercial then to the AKF has really come to light. As an attempt to cost savings insurance companies are no longer going to allow charitable premium assistance. Be mind full that there is a lot of rent seeking behavior going on though out the healthcare industry. And that charitable asstance has played a factor in don’t worry about the out of pocket cost we’ll just get insurance to pay for it. Like philidor and VRX
Bear Au Contraire profile picture
What scheme has recently come to light? UNH sued ARA back in 2016... Is this what you're referring to?
hijlehhw profile picture
You lost me when you called it a scheme...this is well known, in fact DVA has specifically addressed these accusations in conference calls and they just aren't true. The fact of the matter is that DVA gave employees specific and in depth training before offering alternative options to patients. The fact also remains that allowing AKF to cover costs IS IN the best interest of the patient. I agree this is a laughable analysis and clickbait raising a "question" that is old news and has been addressed...
hijlehhw profile picture
I'l also add that between BRK and Ted, they control a majority of outstanding shares...Ted has a very very significant percentage of his entire family wealth tied up in DVA...to think that these two havent discussed potential changes or threats to that money is naive. This is clearly a very HIGH conviction position for both guys..DVA isnt going anywhere....I should rephrase that...its going UP, as the tremendous share repurchase starts to impact share count and EPS.
hijlehhw profile picture
This is ridiculous, patients need the care to live...period..This is a large problem, unfunded patient care. If you challenge the way these treatments are funded, and jeopardize Fresenius or DVA...you arent hurting the insurance companies, or the care providers (they'll just close shop in unprofitable) and you are left with patients feeling this impact and potentially overloading normal care providing facilitates that do no specialize in the treatment to the same degree or have facilities large enough to handle the influx...end result..patients DIE.

No politician wants that, nor do voters. In addition, the dialysis providers are a relatively low margin bus compared to many others...There are plnety of places to trim fat in the healthcare industry..IMO dialysis is very far down the trough/targets. Its an imperative service, they provide the best care and do so at a marginal profit...
P
This is old news... patients deserve the best healthcare they have available. Most are on disability due to comorbid conditions and cannot work. What is the difference between subsidized insurance eg AKI and government insurance?
Bear Au Contraire profile picture
The charitable premium assistance debacle started years ago. Why haven't commercial payers pulled back at this point?
Disagree with this article? Submit your own. To report a factual error in this article, . Your feedback matters to us!
To ensure this doesn’t happen in the future, please enable Javascript and cookies in your browser.
Is this happening to you frequently? Please report it on our feedback forum.
If you have an ad-blocker enabled you may be blocked from proceeding. Please disable your ad-blocker and refresh.