Mayhan v. Ryan et al
| Arthur Roy Mayhan |
| Charles Ryan and Arizona Attorney General, State of |
| 2:2009cv01647 |
| August 10, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Pima |
| David K Duncan (PS) |
| Paul G Rosenblatt |
| None |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
33
ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that the petitioner's motion entitled "Petitioner RequestReview Consideration of Above Cases Respondents' Attorney, Assistant AttorneyGeneral Ms Amy Thorson Withheld Valuable Court Document Exh. Z, Cause Serious Physical Injury 28 U.S.C. § 1915(G)" (Doc. 32) is denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no certificate of appealability shall be issued. Signed by Judge Paul G Rosenblatt on 1/17/12.(LAD)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation 26 is accepted and adopted by the Court. ORDER that the petitioner's Request for Status of Objection 29 is denied as moot. ORDER that the petitioner's Petition Under 28:22 54 for a Writ of Habeas Corpus is denied as time-barred and that this action is dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly. ORDER that no certificate of appealability shall issue. Signed by Judge Paul G Rosenblatt on 7/14/10. (TLJ)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
