United States of America v. $33,980.00 in United States Currency
| United States of America |
| $33,980.00 in United States Currency |
| 8:2012cv00300 |
| August 27, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 8 Omaha Office |
| F.A. Gossett |
| Drug Related Seizure of Property |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
38
JUDGMENT - Pursuant to the joint Stipulation for Dismissal filed by plaintiff and claimant Joseph G. Gannon (filing 37), this Court's order of August 14, 2013 (filing 29 ), and the previous stipulation filed by plaintiff and claimant (filing 28), this case is dismissed, with prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs and fees. Ordered by Judge John M. Gerrard. (AOA)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER - The Joint Motion (filing 34 ) is granted. A conference is set for November 22, 2013, at 12:00 p.m., in the chambers of the Special Proceedings Courtroom of the Roman L. Hruska Federal Courthouse, 111 South 18th Plaza, Omaha, Nebraska. The deadline for complying with the Court's order of August 14, 2013 (filing 29 ), will be set following the conference. Ordered by Judge John M. Gerrard. (AOA)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER - The U.S. Marshals Service is directed to return $11,315.00 of the defendant property to the claimant, Joseph G. Gannon, by making payment to the trust account of his attorney of record, Adam J. Sipple. The remaining defendant property , $22,665.00, is forfeited to the United States and shall be disposed of by the U.S. Marshals Service. The plaintiff and the claimant shall each bear their own costs and attorney fees. Upon receipt of the tendered funds, Mr. Sipple shall f ile a notice showing such receipt. Upon the filing of Mr. Sipple's receipt, the parties shall file a joint stipulation for dismissal which will fully dispose of this case. This case is removed from the Court's trial docket. The Clerk of the Court shall set a dismissal papers deadline of September 13, 2013. Absent compliance with this order, this case (including counterclaims and the like) may be dismissed without further notice. Ordered by Judge John M. Gerrard. (1 Certified copy to USM)(AOA)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER granting 26 Email Motion to cancel the Pretrial Conference. Pretrial Conference is canceled. Pretrial Conference Memo should be e-mailed to Magistrate Judge Zwart by August 21, 2013. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (DMS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: United States of America v. $33,980.00 in United States Currency | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Nancy A. Svoboda |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: $33,980.00 in United States Currency | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
